Jump to content

Woman's film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KConWiki (talk | contribs) at 21:03, 7 November 2015 (→References). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bette Davis and Henry Fonda in Jezebel (1938), one of the quintessential woman's films. Davis plays a Southern belle who loses her fiancé (Fonda) and her social standing when she defies conventions. She redeems herself by self-sacrifice.[1]

The woman's film is a film genre which includes women-centered narratives, female protagonists and is designed to appeal to a female audience. Woman's films usually portray "women's concerns" such as problems revolving around domestic life, the family, motherhood, self-sacrifice, and romance.[2] These films were produced from the silent era through the 1950s and early 1960s, but were most popular in the 1930s and 1940s, reaching their zenith during World War II. Although Hollywood continued to make films characterized by some of the elements of the traditional woman's film in the second half of the 20th century, the term itself disappeared in the 1960s. The work of directors George Cukor, Douglas Sirk, Max Ophüls, and Josef von Sternberg has been associated with the woman's film genre.[3] Joan Crawford, Bette Davis, and Barbara Stanwyck were some of the genre's most prolific stars.[4]

The beginnings of the genre can be traced back to D. W. Griffith's silent films. Film historians and critics defined the genre and canon in retrospect. Before the woman's film became an established genre in the 1980s, many of the classic woman's films were referred to as melodramas.

Woman's films are films that were made for women by predominantly male screenwriters and directors whereas women's cinema encompasses films that have been made by women.[5]

Definition

File:Mildred-Pierce-One-Sheet.jpg
Mildred Pierce (1945) embraced elements of the woman's film and film noir: a narrative focus on domestic life, motherhood, and a female point of view set off by stark light/dark contrasts and dramatic shadow patterning, flashbacks, and a pessimistic tone.[6]

When the woman's film was still at a nascent stage, it was not regarded as a fully independent genre.[7] Mary Ann Doane, for example, argued that the woman's film is not a "pure genre" because it is crossed and informed by a number of other genres such as melodrama, film noir, the gothic, and horror film.[8] Similarly, film scholar Scott Simmon argues that the woman's film has remained "elusive" to the point of having its very existence questioned. This elusiveness, he argues, is partially due to the fact that the woman's film is an oppositional genre which can only be defined in opposition to male-centered genres like the Western and gangster film.[9] It has also been noted that it is a critically rather than industrially constructed genre, having been defined in retrospect rather than at the time of the films' production.[10] The woman's film was seen as closely related to and even synonymous with melodrama.[11] Other terms commonly used to describe the woman's film were "drama", "romance", "love story", "comedy drama", and "soap opera".[12] Since the late 1980s, the woman's film has been an established film genre.[13] Film scholar Justine Ashby, however, has observed a trend in British cinema that she calls "generic eclipse" whereby films that adhere to all the fundamental tenets of the woman's film are subsumed under other genres. Millions Like Us (1943) and Two Thousand Women (1944), for example, have been described and promoted as war films rather than woman's films.[14]

The woman's film differs from other film genres in that it is primarily addressed to women.[15] Cinema historian Jeanine Basinger argues that the first of three purposes of the woman’s film is "to place a woman at the center of the story universe".[16] In most other and particularly men-oriented film genres the opposite is the case as women and their concerns have been assigned minor roles. Molly Haskell explains that "if a woman hogs this universe unrelentingly, it is perhaps her compensation for all the male-dominated universes from which she has been excluded: the gangster film, the western, the war film, the policier, the rodeo film, the adventure film".[17] The second purpose of the woman's film, according to Basinger, is "to reaffirm in the end the concept that a woman's true job is that of being a woman". A romantic ideal of love is presented as the only "career" that will guarantee happiness and that women should aspire to.[16] The third purpose of the genre, as suggested by Basinger, is "to provide a temporary visual liberation of some sort, however small – an escape into a purely romantic love, into sexual awareness, into luxury, or into the rejection of the female role".[16] Basinger argues that the major – if not only – action of the woman's film and its biggest source of drama and tragedy is the necessity to make a choice.[18] The heroine will have to decide between two or more paths that are equally appealing but mutually exclusive as, for example, romantic love and a fulfilling job. One path will be right and consistent with the film’s overall morality and the other path will be wrong but it will provide liberation. As the films' heroines were punished for following the wrong path and ultimately reconciled to their roles as women, wives, and mothers, Basinger argues that woman's films "cleverly contradict themselves" and "easily reaffirm the status quo for the woman's life while providing little releases, small victories or even big releases, big victories".[19]

Identifying characteristics

Unlike male-centered movies which are frequently shot outdoors, most woman's films are set in the domestic sphere,[20] which defines the lives and roles of the female protagonist.[21] Whereas the events in woman's films – weddings, proms, births – are socially defined by nature and society, the action in male films – chasing criminals, participating in a fight – is story-driven.[22]

The themes in woman's and male-oriented films are often diametrically opposed: fear of separation from loved ones, emphasis on emotions, and human attachment in women's films, as opposed to fear of intimacy, repressed emotionality, and individuality in male-oriented movies.[20] The plot conventions of woman's films revolve around several basic themes: love triangles, unwed motherhood, illicit affairs, the rise to power, and mother-daughter relationships.[23] The narrative pattern depends on the activity engaged in by the heroine and commonly includes sacrifice, affliction, choice, and competition.[24] The maternal melodrama, the career woman comedy, and the paranoid woman's film, a subgenre based on suspicion and distrust, are the most frequent subgenres.[25] Female madness, depression, hysteria, and amnesia were frequent plot elements in Hollywood's woman's films of the 1940s. This trend took place when Hollywood tried to incorporate aspects of psychoanalysis. In the medical discourse in films like Now, Voyager (1942), Possessed (1947) and Johnny Belinda (1948), mental health is visually represented by beauty and mental illness by an unkept appearance; health was restored if the female protagonist improved her appearance.[26] Friendship among women was fairly common,[27] although the treatment was superficial and focused more on women's dedication to men and female-male relationships than on their friendships with each other.[28]

In King Vidor's Stella Dallas (1937), Barbara Stanwyck plays a working-class mother who sacrifices her connection to her daughter in order to help her become part of an upper-class world.[29]

The woman's films that were produced in the 1930s during the Great Depression have a strong thematic focus on class issues and questions of economic survival whereas the 1940s woman's film places its protagonists in a middle- or upper-middle-class world and is more concerned with the characters' emotional, sexual, and psychological experiences.[30]

The female protagonist is portrayed as either good or bad.[31] Haskell distinguishes three types of women that are particularly common to woman’s films: the extraordinary, ordinary and the "ordinary woman who becomes extraordinary". The extraordinary women are characters like Scarlett O'Hara and Jezebel who are played by equally extraordinary actresses like Vivien Leigh and Bette Davis. They are independent and emancipated "aristocrats of their sex" who transcend the limitations of their sexual identities. The ordinary women, in contrast, are bound by the rules of their respective societies because their range of options is too limited to break free of their limitations. The ordinary woman who becomes extraordinary is a character who "begins as a victim of discriminatory circumstances and rises, through pain, obsession, or defiance, to become mistress of her fate."[32] Depending on the type of heroine a film champions, a film can be either socially conservative or progressive.[33] Certain archetypal characters appear in many woman's films: unreliable husbands, the other man, a female competitor, the reliable friend, usually an older woman, and the sexless male, frequently depicted as an older man who offers the protagonist security and luxury but makes no sexual demands on her.[34]

A common motif in Hollywood's woman's films is that of the doppelgänger sisters (often played by the same actress), one good and one bad who vie for one man as Bette Davis in her double role in A Stolen Life (1946) and Olivia de Havilland in The Dark Mirror (1946).[35] The good woman is portrayed as passive, sweet, emotional, and asexual whereas the bad woman is assertive, intelligent, and erotic. The conflict between them is resolved with the defeat of the bad woman.[36] A central element of the 1980s British woman's film is the motif of escape. Woman's films allow their respective female protagonists to escape their everyday lives and their socially and sexually prescribed roles. The escape can take the form of a journey to another place such as the USSR in Letter to Brezhnev (1985) and Greece in Shirley Valentine (1989) or education as in Educating Rita (1983) and sexual initiation as in Wish You Were Here (1987).[14]

History

The beginnings of the genre can be traced back to D. W. Griffith whose one- and two-reelers A Flash of Light (1910) and Her Awakening (1911) feature the trademark narratives of repression and resistance that would later define a majority of women's films.[37] Other predecessors of the genre include women-centered serial films such as The Exploits of Elaine (1914) and Ruth of the Rockies (1920).[38]

The woman's film genre was particularly popular in 1930s and 1940s, reaching its zenith during World War II.[39] The film industry of that time had an economic interest in producing such films as women were believed to comprise a majority of movie-goers. In line with this perception, many woman's films were prestigious productions which attracted some of the best stars and directors.[27] Some film scholars suggest that the genre as a whole was well-regarded within the film industry,[40] while others argue that the genre and term "woman's film" had derogatory connotations and was used by critics to dismiss certain films.[41]

Production of women's films dropped off in the 1950s as melodrama became more male-centered and as soap operas began to appear on television.[39] Although Hollywood continued to make films marked by some of the features and concerns of the traditional woman's film in the second half of the 20th century, the term itself disappeared in the 1960s.[42]

The genre was revived in the early 1970s.[43] Attempts to create modern versions of the classic woman's film, updated to take account of new social norms, include Martin Scorsese's Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore (1974), An Unmarried Woman (1978) by Paul Mazursky, Garry Marshall's Beaches (1988), and Fried Green Tomatoes (1995) by Jon Avnet. Similarly, the 2002 films The Hours and Far from Heaven took their cues from the classic woman's film.[44] Elements of the woman's film have reemerged in the modern horror film genre. Films such as Brian De Palma's Carrie (1976) and Ridley Scott's Alien (1979) subvert traditional representations of femininity and refuse to follow the traditional marriage plot. The female protagonists in these movies are driven by something other than romantic love.[45]

Within British cinema, David Leland returned to the formula of the 1980s woman's film in The Land Girls (1998). The film tells the story of three young women during World War II and offers its heroines the opportunity to escape their old lives. Bend It Like Beckham (2002) emphasizes the key generic theme of female friendship and casts the heroine in a conflict between the restrictions of her traditional Sikh upbringing and her aspirations to become a football player. Lynne Ramsay's Morvern Callar is based on the woman's film tradition; a young woman escapes to Spain and pretends to be the author of her boyfriend's novel. While Morvern's journeys and transformations allow for liberation, she ends up where she started.[46]

Response

Jeanine Basinger notes that woman's films were often criticized for reinforcing conventional values, above all, the notion that women could only find happiness in love, marriage and motherhood. However, she argues that they were "subtly subversive". They implied that a woman could not combine a career and a happy family life, but they also offered women a glimpse of a world outside the home, where they did not sacrifice their independence for marriage, housekeeping, and childrearing. The pictures depicted women with successful careers as journalists, pilots, car company presidents, and restaurateurs.[4] Similarly, Simmon notes that the genre offered a mixture of repression and liberation, in which repressive narratives are regularly challenged, partly via mise-en-scène and acting but also by conflicts within the narratives themselves. He further states that such resistances were present in some of the earliest woman's films and became the rule with Douglas Sirk's postwar American woman's films.[47] Others have argued, however, that the narratives of these films offer only the repressive perspective and that viewers must read the texts "against the grain" to be able to find a liberating message.[48] Critics such as Haskell have criticized the term "woman's film" itself. She writes:

What more damning comment on the relations between men and women in America than the very notion of something called the 'woman's film'? (...) A film that focuses on male relationships is not pejoratively dubbed a 'man's film' (...), but a 'psychological drama.'"[49]

Some woman's film have been met with critical acclaim. Woman's films that were selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry as being "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" include It Happened One Night (1934), Imitation of Life (1934), Jezebel (1938), Gone with the Wind (1939), The Women (1939), The Lady Eve (1941), Now, Voyager (1942),[50] Mildred Pierce (1945), Letter from an Unknown Woman (1948),[11] Adam's Rib (1949), All About Eve (1950), and All That Heaven Allows (1955).[51]

See also

References

Notes
  1. ^ Basinger, Jeanine. Jezebel. Audio commentary, 2006 DVD re-issue.
  2. ^ Doane 1987, pp. 152–53.
  3. ^ Heung, Marina (1990). Howard, Angela; Kevenik, Frances M. (eds.). Handbook of American Women's History. New York: Garland. ISBN 978-0-8240-8744-9. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |chapterurl= (help)
  4. ^ a b Basinger 2010, p. 163.
  5. ^ Ashby 2010, p. 153.
  6. ^ Langford 2005, p. 48.
  7. ^ Altman 1998, p. 29.
  8. ^ Doane cited in Altman 1998, pp. 28–29.
  9. ^ Simmon 1993, p. 68.
  10. ^ Altman 1998, p. 28.
  11. ^ a b Modleski, Tania (1984). "Time and Desire in the Woman's Film". Cinema Journal 23 (3): 19–30.
  12. ^ Neale, Stephen (1993). "Melo Talk: On the Meaning and Use of the Term 'Melodrama' in the American Trade Press". The Velvet Light Trap 32 (3): 66–89.
  13. ^ Altman 1998, p. 32.
  14. ^ a b Ashby 2010, p. 155.
  15. ^ Doane 1987, p. 3.
  16. ^ a b c Basinger 1994, p. 13.
  17. ^ Haskell 1987, p. 155.
  18. ^ Basinger 1994, p. 19.
  19. ^ Basinger 1994, p. 10.
  20. ^ a b Walsh 1986, p. 24.
  21. ^ Neale 2000, p. 181.
  22. ^ Basinger 1994, p. 9.
  23. ^ Basinger 2010, pp. 163, 166.
  24. ^ Haskell 1987, p. 157.
  25. ^ Walsh 1986, p. 125.
  26. ^ Doane 1986, pp. 153, 155.
  27. ^ a b Langford 2005, p. 45.
  28. ^ Hollinger 1998, pp. 36–40.
  29. ^ Langford 2005, p. 46.
  30. ^ McKee 2014, pp. 24–25.
  31. ^ Basinger 2010, p. 164.
  32. ^ Haskell 1987, pp. 160–61.
  33. ^ Hollinger 1998, p. 28.
  34. ^ Basinger 2010, pp. 165–66.
  35. ^ Simmon 1993, p. 78.
  36. ^ Fischer, Lucy (1983). "Two-Faced Women: The 'Double' in Women's Melodrama of the 1940s". Cinema Journal 23 (1): 24–43.
  37. ^ Simmon 1993, pp. 68–69, 71.
  38. ^ Hollinger 2012, p. 36.
  39. ^ a b Russel, Catherine (1994). "Mourning the Woman's Film: The Dislocated Spectator in The Company of Stranger". Canadian Journal of Film Studies 3 (2): 25–39.
  40. ^ Neale 2000, p. 193.
  41. ^ Haskell 1987, pp. 154–55.
  42. ^ Neale 2000, p. 184.
  43. ^ Heung, Marina (1991). "'What's the matter with Sarah Jane?': Daughters and Mothers in Douglas Sirk's Imitation of Life". In Fischer, Lucy (ed.). Imitation of Life: Douglas Sirk, Director. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-1644-8. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  44. ^ Langford 2005, p. 49.
  45. ^ Greven 2011, pp. 91–140.
  46. ^ Ashby 2010, pp. 162, 163–65, 166–68.
  47. ^ Simmon 1993, p. 71.
  48. ^ Hollinger 1998, p. 35.
  49. ^ Haskell 1987, p. 154.
  50. ^ LaPlace, Maria. "Producing and Consuming the Woman's Film: Discursive Struggle in Now, Voyager". In Home is where the Heart is: Studies in Melodrama and the Woman's Film by Christine Gledhill, London: British Film Institute, 1987, ISBN 978-0-85170-199-8.
  51. ^ National Film Preservation Board. "Films Selected to The National Film Registry, 1989–2010". Library of Congress, accessed October 28, 2011.
Bibliography
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woman%27s_film&oldid=689538543"