User talk:JForget

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

JForget's last edit was in 2010. This note added December 2013 by another user.

Retired

Note to all: After four years of heavy contributions to Wikipedia from articles creations, expansion and improvements to admin duties and 100 000+ edits, I've decided that I will be semi-retirement mode therefore making little contributions in both admin and general improvements here. Yes, it's Wiki Fatigue and the busy work schedule contributed as well. For more rapid responses related to admin duties please contact other admins listed on the user page, which I might expand the list later,

edit count | edit summary usage

This user is a member of WikiProject Ottawa
The project is an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Ottawa. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Please do not post silly comments or vandalism. Personal attacks, vandalism, yelling-type comments and other forms of disruption will be immediately reverted and users trolling or vandalizing may be blocked for more than one offense. Use my own sandbox for test edits. For those asking a question, making a comment or request, alerting me for mistakes, deletion of page discussion or other stuff or any incidents or any other fluff, leave it here and I will try if possible to answer as soon as possible. Thank You!

For editors reverting vandalism, thank you very much!

About 40 ancient talk page messages of no likely future value

Aspen Dental

Hello: As you are a user who has edited the Aspen Dental page in the past, I’d like to solicit your input on sections that have been added to the page that lack citation, and potentially violate neutral POV. As a COI user I’d like to avoid making edits to the page myself, and so was hoping you could take a look. Here is the discussion: Talk:Aspen Dental. Thank you. - Amanda aspendental (talk) 20:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tetrasil

Please modify Tetrasil. It is patented here by US government , http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5676977.PN.&OS=PN/5676977&RS=PN/5676977 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amourcratez (talk • contribs) 07:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm kind of a big deal

I'm confused why you deleted "I'm kind of a big deal" WHY? MAKE THE PAGE! There are no copyright violations, and it is hugely popular among other entities such as FPS russia (second most popular youtube channel, most popular among subscribers). I'll make it, just unlock it. THanks.

Talkback

I'm requesting the undeletion of an article. You deleted the article and looking at the discussion, it was not particularly favourable for being a WP article. Care to share your thoughts on my talk page? Thanks. Scoutstr295 sDrewth 9:21, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, JForget. You have new messages at Billinghurst's talk page.
Message added 10:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A user has requested the undeletion of an article and move to their user space. You deleted the article and looking at the discussion, it was not particularly favourable for being a WP article. Care to share your thoughts on my talk page? Thanks. billinghurst sDrewth 10:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of my deleted article Geonext

Hi. Since you are in Category:Wikipedia administrators who will provide copies of deleted articles, could you please provide me with a copy of my deleted article Geonext? Either via Email or by restoring the article in my user space. I believe the subject is notable for Wikipedia and therefor I wish to see what WP:RS I included and which I forgot to include. Kind regards, --Church of emacs (Talk) 10:06, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

65 days of static Vol 2 How i F***** off All Of my friends

I was wondering why this article was deleted and if i might be able to get a copy of the album art. I am a collector of sorts and it came up in my tagging

Thank you very much for your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThexxPeach (talk • contribs) 08:49, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crimsonland AfD

Hi JForget, I've just noticed that Crimsonland is still knocking about with an AfD notice from June. I had added it to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/10tons_Entertainment, which you closed as Delete. The concensus was to delete Crimsonland too. No improvement on the article since then. Could you do the honours? Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 13:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for defending Hamfatter...

... but your intervention is not required. Hamfatter is indeed a failed Cmbridge pop/rock band and I have amended their entry accordingly. There is no need for you to intervene again, nor to explain the rules or ethos of Wikipedia, with which I am fully familiar.

If you yourself are unfamiliar with the broad and differing nature of the Internet - and the opinions expressed therein which reflect this - then please feel free to ask, and I will be happy to explain. Until then, please do not revert the Hamfatter entry until you can provide evidence to back up your position. Until then, welcome to Wiki, and let me state that your enthusiasm is most welcome also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.192.73 (talk) 23:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although other people have reverted it again. You might at well take a look at WP:NPOV if you have a chance. Sure criticism of the band can be added in the article as long as it has reliable sources but not personal opinions especially on the first sentence (well anywhere in the article). JForget 23:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

For deleting a funny page for me. AboundingHinata (talk) 00:30, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you're welcome. JForget 00:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP Indonesia

Is dare i state as such - basically on care and maintenance these days - so any removal of deleted BLPS or anything like that is appreciated - cheers - Satu Suro 01:10, 15 August 2010 (UTC) In fact when you start looking too close the project is cursed by lists with red links :) Satu Suro 01:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List shit cruft...

Hello there - thanks for your efforts in cleaning up the Indonesian lists. Much appreciated. I've done much over the years - but it's like laundry - it always returns. cheers --Merbabu (talk) 01:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(reply to both messages) : No problem at all Yep there are a lot of it (red links), but when I usually make maintenance work it is usually on list pages in which all have blue links except a couple of red links or index/list of topics pages. If it is consisting in majority of red links - I don't touch them generally. So I might just touch a few Indonesia list pages only. JForget 01:31, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And note too, it was by luck that I stomp on that page as I was removing red links following the deletion closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budi Santoso JForget 01:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again from us - it is appreciated !!! Satu Suro 01:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Stacy

Hi there, I would like to appeal the deletion of Brandon Stacy. He is Spock in the Phase 2 series which gets over 4,000,000 hits per month. I don't think this is "not a notable" achievement. Please let me know if I need to work the article differently to allow it to stay on Wiki. I suppose adding that he is Zachary Quinto's body double in Star Trek would assist?

Thank you!

Miss Kat —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rynnakat (talk • contribs) 20:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To appeal a deletion you would have to go at WP:DRV as it was the result of this Checking out the edits and it does mention briefly that but I suspect that since he only did that role for three episodes and only in the fan series, they thought it wasn't notable enough to warrant its own article. Most of the other actors in the fan series don't even had their own articles. Stacy seems to have multiple roles although they don't look significant for the most part aside from Spock but an actor must have multiple significant roles in multiple productions according to WP:ENT. Looking at the list of roles, many of them look minor and also many of them for just 1 or 2 episodes so even though he played in TV series such as the O.C., Joey or Hannah Montana, they looked to be minor roles in only a few episodes (if not more then one). Not sure if his role in Dead Man Walking and other film were significant though. Though the list is from IMDB so more sources would be needed for the filmography. I can userfy the article so you can make the additions as well as copy-editing/clean-up per WP:MOS, although it might be a long shot for him to have an article unless he gets a major role in the Reaper. Lots of Google hits but little significant/reliable/tertiary sources.JForget 16:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page revival request

Hello, I noticed that you were the deleting admin in a page I created, List of sponsored sports competitions in this AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sponsored sports competitions. Now the main verdict for it's deletion was because the criteria was too unwieldy and could have included any club to create an unessicary huge list. Well after having it userfied, I have limited the inclusion criteria to only include top level competitions that top level teams play for. The work I have done on it in improvement is here User:The C of E/List of sponsored sports competitions. Please let me know if you think this is acceptable to be brought back to the main page or if it would be better going to Deletion Review? The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

[1] -- Y not? 22:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert, I could have close it but prefered a couple more comments to ensure consensus (if there will be one)... but doesn't sound it will be deleted though. JForget 22:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was just discussed at ANI. I'm surprised you weren't informed but the thread's now been marked "resolved". I almost closed the AFD in question because I didn't think that the two delete !votes were that strong (but they did put it slightly out of NAC range) and it's not a discussion I would have relisted but the suggestion that you relisted it in bad faith because "you wanted it deleted" was completely uncalled for. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:03, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind?

Will you please close this discussion as I have withdrawn my deletion request. I would appreciate it. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 01:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing JForget a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deletion of the Scott Free (musician) page

JForget, I left a message with IronGargoyle about him possibly reviving the 'Scott Free (musician)' page. I realize now that editing a page about yourself is a conflict of interest - but I did not create the page, and Wikipedia encourages updating pages to keep them current. I was going to add that I am being inducted into the City Of Chicago Gay & Lesbian Hall of Fame http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Gay_and_Lesbian_Hall_of_Fame and is referenced at The Advocate and Huffington Post http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/09/20/G_and_L_Hall_of_Fame_Honors_15/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chicago I'm not sure if that is enough to revive the page - I tried to request a reviving of the page, but not sure if it went through.

thanks! Mrscottfree (talk) 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Mrscottfree[reply]

Invite to DRV

An AFD you slightly participated in, by relisting, (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tony_Sokol), is at DRV here. It would be interesting to see your thoughts on it. Thanks, Bigger digger (talk) 00:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Schaul

I noticed that jordan schaul is no longer available on wickipedia's site. He has a huge following. We love his show in the zoo world and it indicates that you deleted his page based on the talk page commentary. It further mentions that we contact you for consideration of uploading a new bio. I prepared the following.

"Jordan Schaul is the producer and host of Zoo Talkin' Radio Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page)."

May we upload it. Thanks J.M.> USER NAME Zookeeper4u (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Please let me know if I can upload it.[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jordan_Schaul and Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_44. I've tagged Jordan Schaul it for deletion per WP:CSD#G4. Zookeeper4u - you need to start a thread at WP:DELREV to recreate an article and demonstrate that they meet the notability requirements of WP:BIO. Smartse (talk) 17:06, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

earlier afd

You closed the first AfD, but the article re-created with some additional sources. I've sent it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Salama (2nd nomination), and you may wish to comment there DGG ( talk ) 19:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD review for Arborophilia

You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arborophilia as no consensus, but I'd like to relist or review the AfD since all the editors who participated were blocked as Appel sockpuppets. As you are semi-retired, I'm not sure if I should take this up at WP:Deletion review or just renominate it, but the directions noted to contact the closing admin first. I've added a few links to new and existing references, but a recent search provides no indication of coverage beyond regional theater productions. Flowanda | Talk 01:07, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this is factually inaccurate. AfD was closed as KEEP not no consensus. 79.142.65.53 (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

for some reason I am a talk page stalkerI don't think deletion review is appropriate, as the consensus at the time (Feb 2010) was to keep so consensus was clear before the socking was revealed. You should just straight relist it if you don't think it's notable. Bigger digger (talk) 23:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks, it looks like renomination is the right way to go, but talking with the closing admin seems to be universal first step. Flowanda | Talk 07:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for DragonFable

An editor has asked for a deletion review of DragonFable. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 4:25pm • 05:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re-create holidaylettings deleted article

Hi,

I'm recreating a page similar to a page that has been deleted. As suggested, I'm contacting the deleting administrator first. The article is for holidaylettings. The company has grown in notability and facts can be backed up with references from The Guardian and The Times newspapers in the UK. The content has been rewritten to provide a neutral tone with citations.

How would you suggest proceeding?

Thanks,

Silnerhenun Silnerhenun (talk) 11:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion for Combination Lock (disambiguation)

This article was about a television project and game that I created and worked very hard on throughout the years, why was it deleted? I'd like it restored please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrtv1 (talk • contribs) 08:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Panthere Mont-Bleu.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Panthere Mont-Bleu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:46, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AFD on article(s) you wrote

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premiership of Stephen Harper. NW (Talk) 02:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Partners

I am creating articles to address the number of redlinks associated with director Lewis Milestone. The next on my list is User:MichaelQSchmidt/Lucky Partners, but I discovered that an article by that same name had been deleted in 2008.[2] However, in reading that AFD discussion, my impression is that the original article my have been about something other than the 1940 film. I wish your approval to continue, as my own offering will be a properly sourced article about the 1940 film, and not some other topic. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

request to undelete Anna Ayala

JForget,

I know you're not around much, but maybe you can consider fulfilling my request. You deleted the Anna Ayala article based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Ayala, which provided two opinions to delete the article, and one opinion to move the information to Wendy's. Over 20 different editors worked on this article, and it seems to me unfair to them to delete it based on the opinions of two editors who wanted it deleted. Really, an AfD with so little activity (especially regarding an article of such size and such care in its development) should have been extended another week.

The story still has significant internet coverage.

As in the case of Jennifer Wilbanks, which now redirects to Runaway bride case, maybe the article would serve Wikipedia best if it were renamed Finger hoax or something like that.

Thoughts? Kingturtle = (talk) 16:08, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-Russell

Wikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-Russell, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-Russell and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Prescott-Russell during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Matthew wright/MWICPS

User:Matthew wright/MWICPS, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Matthew wright/MWICPS and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Matthew wright/MWICPS during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. » SkyyTrain (talk) 10:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 15:51, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So The R.O.C. is being deleted why?

I know your scared but please dont delete this and give me an actual reason. I know there is no reason for it and you are probably just doing it because you are pmsing. HE IS A LEGITIMATE RAPPER. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.185.25 (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 12:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno^talk 12:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Bloody Knuckles

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bloody Knuckles. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Thinker jones (talk) 22:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

st. david

St. David School (Richmond, California) an article that you have participated in editing has been nominated for deletion a second time, the first time in 2006 resulted in no consensus and, it can be reviewed here. The current discussion on the removal of the article is located here should you wish leave your comment.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:14, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marie-Mai-Dangereuse attraction.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Mai-Dangereuse attraction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marie-Mai-Inoxydable.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Mai-Inoxydable.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marie-Mai-Dangereuse attraction.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Mai-Dangereuse attraction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marie-Mai-Inoxydable.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Mai-Inoxydable.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marie-Mai-Dangereuse attraction.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Mai-Dangereuse attraction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:07, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marie-Mai-Inoxydable.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Marie-Mai-Inoxydable.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have questions, please post them here.
I will automatically remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please ask an admin to turn it off here.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 01:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Urimai Kural

You have deleted an article titles Urimai Kural in august 2009. Now I would like to start the article with fresh content. So Please Unlock the page. Balaji ^{(Let's talk)} 09:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marilou album.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Marilou album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request to take part in a survey

Hi there. I would very much appreciate it if you could spend ~2 minutes and take a short survey - a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. I sent you an email with details, if you did not get it please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. I would very much appreciate your cooperation, as you are among the most active Wikipedia editors who show a pattern of reduced activity, and thus your response would be extremely valuable. Thanks! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JForget. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Naming conventions for tornado outbreaks

There is currently a discussion ongoing regarding altering the naming conventions for tornado outbreak and tornado outbreak sequence articles. Please feel free to view and comment on the discussion here. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E) via User:Ks0awb} 22:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC) You are receiving this notice because you are listed as a member of WikiProject Severe Weather. If you would not like to receive future WikiProject Severe Weather notifications, please add your signature at User:Ks0stm/Notify list.[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Farm Boy.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Farm Boy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hazeldean Mall

The article Hazeldean Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 03:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kanata Centrum

The article Kanata Centrum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN shopping area.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 04:11, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aurore.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aurore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Seanwolfington/Sean Wolfington

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Seanwolfington/Sean Wolfington, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:39, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michele Heights for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michele Heights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele Heights until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Highway of Heroes listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Highway of Heroes. Since you had some involvement with the Highway of Heroes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. kelapstick^(bainuu) 04:57, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gregory Charles - I think of you.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gregory Charles - I think of you.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of park and rides in Gatineau for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of park and rides in Gatineau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of park and rides in Gatineau until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 06:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LogoPMLQFontBeige.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LogoPMLQFontBeige.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leitrim Road

The article Leitrim Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just an average Ottawa street. Fails WP:GNG. BEFORE showed only routine coverage, and scant at that. Unsourced since 2006.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Carlingwood-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Carlingwood-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah^Talk 04:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Generation Α

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Generation Α. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.Vitaium (talk) 03:15, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chemin d'Aylmer

The article Chemin d'Aylmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It exists, but I couldn't establish how it meets WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 07:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for February 2007 North American blizzard

February 2007 North American blizzard has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:28, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of tornadoes in the 2003 South Dakota tornado outbreak

The article List of tornadoes in the 2003 South Dakota tornado outbreak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relied entirely on a single source, which is now dead due to link rot. All of this article is now unverifiable and of unclear notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeorgeMemulous (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]