Criticism of Walmart
Wal-Mart has been subject to criticism by numerous groups and individuals. Among these are labor unions, community groups, grassroots organizations, religious organizations, environmental groups and Wal-Mart customers. They have protested against Wal-Mart, the company's policies and business practices, including charges of racial and gender discrimination.  Other areas of criticism include the corporation's foreign product sourcing, treatment of product suppliers, environmental practices[further explanation needed], the use of public subsidies, and the company's security policies. Wal-Mart denies doing anything wrong and maintains that low prices are the result of efficiency.
In 2005, labor unions created new organizations and websites to influence public opinion against Wal-Mart, including Wake Up Wal-Mart (United Food and Commercial Workers) and Walmart Watch (Service Employees International Union). By the end of 2005, Wal-Mart had launched Working Families for Wal-Mart to counter criticisms made by these groups. Additional efforts to counter criticism include launching a public relations campaign in 2005 through its public relations website, which included several television commercials. The company retained the public relations firm Edelman to interact with the press and respond to negative media reports, and has started interacting directly with bloggers by sending them news, suggesting topics for postings, and sometimes inviting them to visit Walmart's corporate headquarters. In November 2005, a documentary film critical of Wal-Mart (Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price) was released on DVD.
Economists at the Cato Institute suggest that Wal-Mart is a success because it sells products that people want to buy at low prices, satisfying customers' wants and needs. However, Wal-Mart's critics argue that Wal-Mart's lower prices draw customers away from other smaller businesses, hurting the community. They also claim that Wal-Mart is hurting the US economy because of excessive reliance on Chinese products. Wal-Mart is the largest importer in the US amongst most categories like electronics (fast-moving consumer goods).
Local communities 
When Walmart plans new store locations, activists sometimes oppose the new store and attempt to block its construction. Opponents cite concerns such as traffic congestion, environment problems, public safety, absentee landlordism, bad public relations, low wages and benefits, and predatory pricing. Opposition sometimes includes protest marches by competitors, informed citizens, activists, labor unions, and religious groups. In some instances, activists demonstrated their opposition by causing property damage to store buildings or by creating bomb scares. Some city councils have denied permits to developers planning to include a Walmart in their project. Those who defend Walmart cite consumer choice and overall benefits to the economy, and object to bringing the issue into the political arena.
A Walmart Superstore opened in 2004 in Mexico, 1.9 miles away from the historic Teotihuacan archaeological site and Pyramid of the Moon. Although Walmart's proposal received protest and media attention, the location was supported by Mexico's National Anthropology Institute, the United Nations, and the Paris-based International Council on Monuments and Sites. Local merchants, helped by environmental groups and anti-globalization groups opposed the construction, and poet Homero Aridjis joined the protest characterizing the opening as "supremely symbolic" and "...like planting the staff of globalization in the heart of ancient Mexico."
Archaeologists oversaw construction and discovered a small clay and stone altar along with some other artifacts where the store's parking lot is now located.
In 1998, Walmart proposed construction of a store off Charlotte Pike near Nashville, Tennessee. The building site was home to both Native American burial grounds and a Civil War battle site. Protests were mounted by Native Americans and Civil War interest groups, but the Walmart store was eventually constructed after moving graves and some modifications of the site so as not to interfere with the battlefield. Civil War relics were also discovered at the site. The project developers donated land to permit access to the Civil War historic site. The Indian burials were removed and re-buried.
In 2005, developers tore down the long-closed Dixmont State Hospital in Kilbuck Township, Pennsylvania near Pittsburgh, with plans to build a shopping complex anchored by a Walmart on the site. While there were initially no general objections to Walmart itself, many residents didn't want to see Dixmont torn down, despite the fact that the Dixmont complex—having been abandoned in 1984—was beyond maintainable condition and teenagers were dangerously trespassing onto the property on a regular basis. However, while the land was being excavated after the complex was torn down in order to create a plateau for the Walmart to sit on, a landslide covered Pennsylvania Route 65 and the railroad tracks in between PA 65 and the Ohio River, shutting down both routes for weeks. While Walmart did "stabilize" the landslide, many residents argued that Walmart merely stabilized the hillside so that it could continue with work to build the store. Ultimately, in 2007 Walmart decided against developing the site, allowing the land to return to nature, with a Walmart location to be constructed in nearby Economy, Pennsylvania instead and scheduled for a 2013 opening. PA 65 remains restricted to one lane northbound near the former Dixmont site for safety concerns, though the entire roadway has since been cleared of debris. Despite this, Walmart is the largest retail chain in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area, and is the second-largest grocery store to locally based Giant Eagle.
Allegations of predatory pricing and supplier issues 
In May 2010, Walmart's US stores pulled its "Miley Cyrus" line of necklaces and bracelets, three months after the Associated Press informed the chain that the jewelry contained harmful amounts of the toxic metal cadmium. Long-term exposure to cadmium can lead to bone softening and kidney failure. It is also a known carcinogen, and research suggests that it can affect brain development in the very young. Cadmium in jewelry is not known to be dangerous if the items are simply worn, but concerns come when youngsters bite or suck on the jewelry, as many children do. Walmart said that while the jewelry is not intended for children, "it is possible that a few younger consumers may seek it out in stores." "We are removing all of the jewelry from sale while we investigate its compliance with our children's jewelry standard," Walmart said. The tainted jewelry was made at a Chinese manufacturer.
Walmart has been accused of selling merchandise at such low costs that competitors have tried to sue it for predatory pricing (intentionally selling a product at low cost in order to drive competitors out of the market). In 1995, in the case of Walmart Stores, Inc. v. American Drugs, Inc., pharmacy retailer American Drugs accused Walmart of selling items at too low a cost for the purpose of injuring competitors and destroying competition. The Supreme Court of Arkansas ruled in favor of Walmart saying that its pricing, including the use of loss leaders, was not predatory pricing. In 2000, the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade, and Consumer Protection accused Walmart of selling butter, milk, laundry detergent, and other staple goods at low cost, with the intention of forcing competitors out of business and gaining a monopoly in local markets. Crest Foods filed a similar lawsuit in Oklahoma, accusing Walmart of predatory pricing on several of its products, in an effort to drive Crest Foods's own company-owned store in Edmond, Oklahoma out of business. Both cases were settled out of court.
In 2006, the big-box retailer promised to bring jobs to the cash-strapped community of Chicago. But according to the company's records that was not to be. Within two years almost 85 local businesses closed their doors to the public, hurting Chicago's economy.
In 2003, Mexico's antitrust agency, the Federal Competition Commission, investigated Walmart for "monopolistic practices" prompted by charges that the retailer pressured suppliers to sell goods below cost or at prices significantly less than those available to other stores. Mexican authorities found no wrongdoing on the part of Walmart. However, in 2003, Germany's High Court ruled that Walmart's low cost pricing strategy "undermined competition" and ordered Walmart and two other supermarkets to raise their prices. Walmart won appeal of the ruling, then the German Supreme Court overturned the appeal. Walmart has since sold its stores in Germany.
Walmart has been accused of using monopoly power to force its suppliers into self-defeating practices. For example, Barry C. Lynn, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation (a think tank), argues that Walmart's constant demand for lower prices caused Kraft Foods to "shut down thirty-nine plants, to let go [of] 13,500 workers, and to eliminate a quarter of its products." Kraft was unable to compete with other suppliers and claims the cost of production had gone up due to higher energy and raw material costs. Lynn argues that in a free market, Kraft could have passed those costs on to its distributors and ultimately consumers.
For example, most Walmart store pharmacies fill many generic prescriptions for $4 for a month's supply. However, in California and ten other states, complaints from other pharmacies have resulted in Walmart being required to charge at least $9 for a month's supply of certain drugs.
The 2010 remodelings of their smaller stores shifting emphasis away from non-grocery products towards carrying grocery items carried by their supercenters, has created a small backlash amongst some customers. The smaller and larger sizes in the adult clothing were discontinued as well as other available styles, forcing adult customers to look for clothing in the children's section, or shop with more expensive specialty "Big and Tall" stores for basic items such as jeans.
Employee and labor relations 
With close to 2.2 million employees worldwide, Walmart has faced a torrent of lawsuits and issues with regards to its workforce. These issues involve low wages, poor working conditions, inadequate health care, as well as issues involving the company's strong anti-union policies. Critics point to Walmart's high turnover rate as evidence of an unhappy workforce, although other factors may be involved. Approximately 70% of its employees leave within the first year. Despite the turnover rate the company still is able to affect unemployment rates. This was found in a study by Oklahoma State University which states, "Walmart is found to have substantially lowered the relative unemployment rates of blacks in those counties where it is present, but to have had only a limited impact on relative incomes after the influences of other socio-economic variables were taken into account."
The activist group Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy (LAANE) said "in 2006 Walmart reports that full-time hourly associates received, on average, $10.11 an hour." It further calculated that working 34 hours per week an employee earns $17,874 per year and claimed that is about twenty percent less than the average retail worker. (The number of hours the "average retail worker" worked was not specified.) The report from LAANE further opines that this pay is "over $10,000 less than what the average two-person family needs." Walmart managers are judged, in part, based on their ability to control payroll costs. Some say this puts extra pressure on higher-paid workers to be more productive. Walmart insists its wages are generally in line with the current local market in retail labor.
Other critics have noted that in 2001, the average wage for a Walmart Sales Clerk was $8.23 per hour, or $13,861 a year, while the federal poverty line for a family of three was $14,630. Walmart founder Sam Walton once said, "I pay low wages. I can take advantage of that. We're going to be successful, but the basis is a very low-wage, low-benefit model of employment."
In August 2006, Walmart announced that it would roll out an average pay increase of 6% for all new hires at 1,200 U.S. Walmart and Sam's Club locations, but at the same time would institute pay caps on veteran workers. While Walmart maintains that the measures are necessary to stay competitive, critics believe that the salary caps are primarily an effort to push higher-paid veteran workers out of the company.
In 2008, Walmart agreed to pay at least $352 million to settle lawsuits claiming that it forced employees to work off the clock. "Several lawyers described it as the largest settlement ever for lawsuits over wage violations."
Because Walmart employs part-time and relatively low paid workers, some workers may partially qualify for state welfare programs. This has led critics to claim that Walmart increases the burden on taxpayer-funded services. A 2002 survey by the state of Georgia's subsidized healthcare system, PeachCare, found that Walmart was the largest private employer of parents of children enrolled in its program; one quarter of the employees of Georgia Walmarts qualified to enroll their children in the federal subsidized healthcare system Medicaid. A 2004 study at the University of California, Berkeley charges that Walmart's low wages and benefits are insufficient, and although decreasing the burden on the social safety net to some extent, California taxpayers still pay $86 million a year to Walmart employees.
On September 4, 2008, the Mexican Supreme Court of Justice ruled that Wal-Mart de Mexico, the Mexican subsidiary of Wal-Mart, must cease paying its employees in part with vouchers redeemable only at Wal-Mart stores.
Working conditions 
Walmart has also faced accusations involving poor working conditions of its employees. For example, a 2005 class action lawsuit in Missouri asserted approximately 160,000 to 200,000 people who were forced to work off-the-clock, were denied overtime pay, or were not allowed to take rest and lunch breaks. In 2000, Walmart paid $50 million to settle a class-action suit that asserted that 69,000 current and former Walmart employees in Colorado had been forced to work off-the-clock. The company has also faced similar lawsuits in other states, including Pennsylvania, Oregon, and  Minnesota. Class-action suits were also filed in 1995 on behalf of full-time Walmart pharmacists whose base salaries and working hours were reduced as sales declined, resulting in the pharmacists being treated like hourly employees.
Walmart has also been accused of ethical problems. It is said that the Walmart employees are gender discriminated when trying to be hired and discriminated against in the work area. Wal-Mart v. Dukes was a discrimination case on behalf of more than 1.5 million current and former female employees of Walmart’s 3,400 stores across the United States. (9th circuit 2007) Dr. William Bliebly who evaluated Walmart’s employment policies "against what social science research shows to be factors that create and sustain bias and those that minimize bias” (Bliebly) and he finished by saying, the men and women not being created equal in the workforce is what Walmart is doing and what they should essentially not be doing.
On October 16, 2006, approximately 200 workers on the morning shift at a Walmart Super Center in Hialeah Gardens, Florida walked out in protest against new store policies and rallied outside the store, shouting "We want justice" and criticizing the company's recent policies as "inhuman." This marks the first time that Walmart has faced a worker-led revolt of such scale, according to both employees and the company. Reasons for the revolt included cutting full-time hours, a new attendance policy, and pay caps that the company imposed in August 2006, compelling workers to be available to work any shift (day, swing or night), and that shifts would be assigned by computers at corporate headquarters and not by local managers. Walmart quickly held talks with the workers, addressing their concerns. Walmart asserts that its policy permits associates to air grievances without fear of retaliation.
The 2004 report by U.S. Representative George Miller alleged that in ten percent of Walmart's stores, nighttime employees were locked inside, holding them prisoner. There has been some concern that Walmart's policy of locking its nighttime employees in the building has been implicated in a longer response time to dealing with various employee emergencies, or weather conditions such as hurricanes in Florida. Walmart said this policy was to protect the workers, and the store's contents, in high-crime areas and acknowledges that some employees were inconvenienced in some instances for up to an hour as they had trouble locating a manager with the key. However, fire officials confirm that at no time were fire exits locked or employees blocked from escape. Walmart has advised all stores to ensure the door keys are available on site at all times.
In January 2004, The New York Times reported on an internal Walmart audit conducted in July 2000, which examined one week's time-clock records for roughly 25,000 employees. According to the Times, the audit, "pointed to extensive violations of child-labor laws and state regulations requiring time for breaks and meals," including 1,371 instances of minors working too late, during school hours, or for too many hours in a day. There were 60,767 missed breaks and 15,705 lost meal times. Walmart’s vice president for communications responded that company auditors had determined that the methodology used was flawed, and the company "did not respond to it in any way internally."
Walmart has been accused of allowing undocumented immigrants to work in its stores. In one case, federal investigators say Walmart executives knew that contractors were using undocumented immigrants as they had been helping the federal government with an investigation for the previous three years. Some critics said that Walmart directly hired illegal immigrants, while Walmart claims they were employed by contractors who won bids to work for Walmart.
On October 23, 2003, federal agents raided 61 Walmart stores in 21 U.S. states in a crackdown known as "Operation Rollback," resulting in the arrests of 250 nightshift janitors who were undocumented. Following the arrests, a grand jury convened to consider charging Walmart executives with labor racketeering crimes for knowingly allowing undocumented immigrants to work at their stores. The workers themselves were employed by agencies Walmart contracted with for cleaning services. Walmart blamed the contractors, but federal investigators point to wiretapped conversations showing that executives knew some workers did not have the right papers. The October 2003 raid was not the first time Walmart was found using unauthorized workers. Earlier raids in 1998 and 2001 resulted in the arrests of 100 workers without documentation located at Walmart stores around the country.
In November 2005, 125 alleged undocumented immigrants were arrested while working on construction of a new Walmart distribution center in eastern Pennsylvania. According to Walmart, the workers were employees of Walmart's construction subcontractor.
Allegations of wrongful termination 
On January 13, 2011, four employees at a Walmart in Layton, Utah were confronted by a shoplifter who pulled out a handgun and took one of the employees hostage in an attempt to leave a small, closed office. The other three employees disarmed and subdued the shoplifter, and all four held onto the man until police arrived. A week later, the four employees were fired for violating a company policy requiring employees to "disengage" and "withdraw" from any situation involving a weapon. The four fired employees, together with two other Walmart employees fired after subduing violent customers, filed a lawsuit against the company in U.S. federal court in June 2011.
Employees using prescription drugs 
In November 2009, Joseph Casias was fired from Walmart in Battle Creek, Michigan, for using medical marijuana. Joseph Casias was a cancer patient with a prescription for marijuana. WalMart spokesman Greg Rossiter claimed that Walmart policy is to terminate employees who take certain prescription medications, and he believed that this policy complied with the law.
Health insurance 
As of October 2005, Walmart's health insurance covered 44% or approximately 572,000 of its 1.3 million U.S. workers. In comparison, Walmart rival and wholesaler Costco insures approximately 96% of its eligible workers, although Costco has been criticized by investors for its high labor costs. Walmart spends an average of $3,500 per employee for health care, 27% less than the retail-industry average of $4,800. When asked why so many Walmart workers choose to enroll in state health care plans instead of Walmart's own plan, Walmart CEO Lee Scott acknowledged that some states' benefits may be more generous than Walmart's own plan: "In some of our states, the public program may actually be a better value – with relatively high income limits to qualify, and low premiums." Critics of Walmart argue in Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price that employees are paid so little they cannot afford health insurance.
According to a September 2002 survey by the state of Georgia, one in four children of Walmart employees were enrolled in PeachCare for Kids, the state's health-insurance program for uninsured children, compared to the state's second-biggest employer, Publix, which had one child in the program for every 22 employees. A December 2004 nationwide survey commissioned by Walmart showed that the use of public-assistance health-care programs by children of Walmart workers was at a similar rate to other retailers' employees, and at rates similar to the U.S. population as a whole.
On October 26, 2005, a Walmart internal memo sent to the firm's Board of Directors advised trimming over $1 billion in health care expenses by 2011 through measures such as attracting a younger, implicitly healthier work force by offering education benefits. The memo also suggested giving sedentary Walmart staffers, such as cashiers, more physically demanding tasks, such as "cart-gathering," and eliminating full-time positions in favor of hiring part-time employees who would be ineligible for the more expensive health insurance and several policy proposals which may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The memo also accused Walmart's lower paid employees of abusing emergency room visits, "possibly due to their prior experience with programs such as Medicaid," whereas such visits may actually be due to the reduced ability of uninsured or underinsured people to make timely appointments to see a regular physician. Critics point to this internal memo as evidence that Walmart purports to be generous with its employee benefits, while in reality the company is working to cut such benefits by reducing the number of full-time and long-term employees and discouraging supposedly unhealthy people from working at Walmart.
On January 12, 2006, the Maryland legislature enacted a law requiring that all corporations with more than 10,000 employees in the state spend at least eight percent of their payroll on employee benefits, or pay into a state fund for the uninsured. Walmart, with about 17,000 employees in Maryland, was the only known company to not meet this requirement before the bill passed. On July 7, 2006, the Maryland law was overturned in federal court by a U.S. District judge who held that a federal law, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), preempted the Maryland law. In his opinion, the judge said that the law would "hurt Walmart by imposing the administrative burden of tracking benefits in Maryland differently than in other states." Similar legislation in Wisconsin days later was defeated in the state legislature.
On April 17, 2006, Walmart announced it was making a health care plan available to part-time workers after one year of service, instead of the prior two-year requirement. One criticism of the new plan is that it provides benefit only after a $1,000 deductible is paid ($3,000 for a family). These deductibles may financially be out of reach for eligible part-time workers. Walmart estimates this change can add 150,000 workers to health coverage plans, if all who are eligible take part. By January 2007, the number of workers enrolled in the company's health care plans increased by 8%, which Walmart attributed to the introduction of less expensive insurance policies. However, even with this increase, less than half of Walmart's employees, or 47.4%, received health insurance through the company, with 10%, or 130,000, receiving no coverage at all.
In October 2001, a class action sexual discrimination lawsuit, Mauldin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., was filed against Walmart challenging the company's denial of health insurance coverage for prescription contraceptives. The lawsuit was certified for class action status, but later dropped by the plaintiffs in 2006 once Walmart agreed to change its health insurance policies.
In March 2008, Walmart sued a former Walmart employee, Deborah Shank, to recover the money it spent for her health care after she was brain-damaged, restricted to a wheelchair, and nursing home-bound after her minivan was hit by a truck. Walmart sued the former employee for $470,000 after she received a settlement from the accident, citing that company policy forbids employees from receiving coverage if they also win a settlement in a lawsuit. After a wave of bad publicity, Walmart dropped its suit.
New, full-time Walmart associates must work at least six months before being eligible to purchase the company's primary health insurance.
In 2011, Walmart stopped providing health insurance for part-time employees working under 24 hours per week. In 2013, health insurance benefits will not be available to employees who work fewer than 30 hours per week. Experts in labor and health care observed that the change will shift the burden of providing health care for Walmart employees to the federal government, as eligibility for Medicaid has been expanded under Obamacare.
Labor union opposition 
Walmart has been criticized for its policies against labor unions. Critics blame workers' reluctance to join the labor union on Walmart anti-union tactics such as managerial surveillance and pre-emptive closures of stores or departments who choose to unionize.  Walmart states that it is not anti-union but, "pro-associate," arguing that its employees do not need to pay third parties to discuss problems with management as the company's open-door policy enables employees to lodge complaints and submit suggestions all the way up the corporate ladder. In 1970, company's late founder Sam Walton resisted a unionization push by the Retail Clerks International Union in two small Missouri towns by hiring a professional union buster to conduct an anti-union campaign. On the union buster's advice, Walton also took steps to show his workers on how the company had their best interests in mind, encouraging them to air concerns with managers and implementing a profit-sharing program. A few years later, Walmart hired a consulting firm, Alpha Associates, to develop a union avoidance program.
In 2000, meat cutters in Jacksonville, Texas voted to unionize and Walmart subsequently eliminated in-house meat-cutting jobs in favor of prepackaged meats on the claims that it cut costs and was a preventive measure to lawsuits. Walmart claimed that the nationwide closing of in-store meat packaging had been planned for many years and was not related to the unionization. In June 2003, a National Labor Relations Board judge ordered Walmart to restore the meat department to its prior structure, complete with meat-cutting, and to recognize and bargain with the union over the effects of any change to case-ready meat sales.
Walmart's anti-union policies also extend beyond the United States. The documentary Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, shows one successful unionization of a Walmart store in Jonquière, Quebec (Canada) in 2004, but Walmart closed the store five months later because the company did not approve of the new "business plan" a union would require. In September 2005, the Québec Labor Board ruled that the closing of a Walmart store amounted to a reprisal against unionized workers and has ordered additional hearings on possible compensation for the employees, though it offered no details.
In March 2005, Walmart executive Tom Coughlin was forced to resign from its Board of Directors, facing charges of embezzlement. Coughlin claimed that the money was used for an anti-union project involving cash bribes paid to employees of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union in exchange for a list of names of Walmart employees that had signed union cards. He also claimed that the money was unofficially paid to him, by Walmart, as compensation for his anti-union efforts. In August 2006, Coughlin pleaded guilty to stealing money, merchandise, and gift cards from Walmart, but avoided prison time due to his poor health. He was sentenced to five years probation and required to pay a $50,000 fine and $411,000 in restitution to Walmart and the Internal Revenue Service. A U.S. attorney has stated that no evidence was found to back up Coughlin's initial claims, and Walmart continues to deny the existence of the anti-union program, though Coughlin himself apparently restated those claims to reporters after his sentencing.
Walmart has also had some run-ins with the German Ver.di labor union as well. These issues, combined with cultural differences and low performing stores, led Walmart to pull out of the German market entirely in 2006.
In August 2006, Walmart announced that it would allow workers at all of its Chinese stores to become members of trade unions, and that the company would work with the state-sanctioned All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) on representation for its 28,000 staff. However, the All-China Federation of Trade Unions has been criticized because it is the only trade union in China and as a tool of the government, ACFTU has been seen as not acting in the best interest of its members (workers), bowing to the government pressure on industry growth and not defending workers' rights.
In November 2012, the United Food & Commercial Workers joined with several Walmart workers with a plan to go on strike on Black Friday at several stores nationwide in protest to low pay, an increase in health insurance premiums, and not being given the option to have the day off or having Thanksgiving off. Walmart has countered this by saying that the strike is illegal due to the union not being sanctioned by the company, and that the striking workers are a small minority of the company's workforce, with the vast majority of workers willing and ready to work the retail industry's busiest day of the year. Many of the states where the UFCW plans to go on strike with the Walmart employees have at-will employment laws protecting the company.
Imports and globalization 
As a large customer to most of its vendors, Walmart openly uses its bargaining power to bring lower prices to attract its customers. The company negotiates lower prices from vendors. For certain basic products, Walmart "has a clear policy" that prices go down from year to year. If a vendor does not keep prices competitive with other suppliers, they risk having their brand removed from Walmart's shelves in favor of a lower-priced competitor. Critics argue that this pressures vendors to shift manufacturing jobs to China and other nations, where the cost of labor is less expensive.
In the mid-1990s, Walmart had a "Buy American" campaign. Yet by 2005, about 60% of Walmart's merchandise was imported, compared to 6% in 1995. In 2004, Walmart spent $18 billion on Chinese products alone, and if it were an individual economy, the company would rank as China's eighth largest trading partner, ahead of Russia, Australia, and Canada. One group estimates that the growing US trade deficit with China, heavily influenced by Walmart imports, is estimated to have moved over 1.5 million jobs that might otherwise be in America to China between 1989 and 2003. According to the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO), "Walmart is the single largest importer of foreign-produced goods in the United States", their biggest trading partner is China, and their trade with China alone constitutes approximately 10% of the total US trade deficit with China as of 2004[update].
While the company certainly imports many products, it points out that it purchases goods from more than 68,000 US vendors, spending $137.5 billion in 2004, and supporting more than 3.5 million supplier jobs in the US.
Overseas labor concerns 
Walmart has been criticized for not providing adequate supervision of its foreign suppliers. It has also been criticized for using sweatshops and prison labor. For example, in 1995, Chinese dissident Harry Wu charged that Walmart was contracting prison labor in Guangdong Province. However, Walmart says it does not use prison labor. There have also been reports of teenagers in Bangladesh working in sweatshops 80 hours per week at $0.14 per hour, for Walmart supplier Beximco. The documentary film Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price shows images of factories that produce goods for Walmart that appear in poor condition, and factory workers subject to abuse and conditions the documentary producers consider inhumane.
According to Walmart and many self-described advocates of free trade, comparisons of wage levels between vastly different countries is not a useful way to assess the fairness of a trade policy. The company also points out that wages paid to overseas workers are comparable to or exceed local prevailing wages. In that case, the company claims that the overseas manufacturing jobs it creates are often an improvement in the quality of life for its employees. They have also drawn attention to the fact that factory jobs with its suppliers are often safer and healthier than local alternatives, which may include prostitution, the drug trade, or scavenging.
Walmart currently uses monitoring which critics say is inadequate and "leaves outsiders unable to verify" conditions. Since Walmart will not release its audits or factory names, outside organizations are left to simply take Walmart's word. Critics suggest an agency such as Social Accountability International or the Fair Labor Association should do the monitoring. In 2004, Walmart began working with Business for Social Responsibility, a San Francisco, California-based nonprofit organization, to reach out to groups active in monitoring overseas plants.
In June 2006, Walmart was excluded from the investment portfolio of The Government Pension Fund of Norway, which held stock values of about $430 million in the company, due to a social audit into alleged labor rights violations in Walmart operations in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Africa, and Asia. Although Walmart did not respond to questions from the fund's auditors, it later claimed the decision "[doesn't] appear to be based on complete information".
On November 24, 2012 a fire in a Bangladesh clothing factory resulted in the death of 112 workers. Survivors said that fire extinguishers didn't work, an exit door was locked, and that when the fire alarm went off, bosses told workers to return to their sewing machines. Victims were trapped or jumped to their deaths from the eight-story building, which had no fire escapes or exits. Initially Walmart said it could not confirm that it had ever sourced apparel from the factory, however photos taken by Bangladeshi labor activists showed Walmart-branded clothing present in the factory after the fire. Walmart later said that a supplier had subcontracted work to the factory "in direct violation of our policies." However, on December 4, documents revealed that at least five supplier companies had been using the Bangladesh factory to provide apparel for Walmart and its subsidiary Sam’s Club during the past year. It was also disclosed in a November 24, New York Times article that officials who had attended a 2011 Bangladesh meeting to discuss factory safety in the garment industry said that the Walmart official there had played the lead role in blocking an effort to have global retailers pay more for apparel to help Bangladesh factories improve their electrical and fire safety. 
Allegations of bribery and coverup in Mexico 
In 2012 The New York Times reported that Walmart had been made aware eight years earlier that executives of Walmart México, its subsidiary in that country, had paid millions of dollars in bribes to local officials to expedite permits for construction and operation of its many stores in that country. The company had opened many stores in Mexico in the late 1990s and early 2000s, attempting to widely establish itself before competitors could. Sergio Cicero, a lawyer who had been responsible for obtaining those permits and was bitter about being passed over for the position of general counsel with Walmart México provided the company's corporate general counsel's office with evidence showing that the company had made large payments to gestores, workers who deal with bureaucracies on behalf of citizens and businesses, with coded indications that the money was being passed on to officials to expedite permits. 
Company officials hired a veteran FBI agent to conduct a preliminary inquiry, instead of hiring an outside law firm as it usually did for major inquiries, such as a similar one in 2003 which found that Walmart México had been helping high-volume customers evade that country's sales taxes. The special investigative team found evidence corroborating almost all of Cicero's allegations, and evidence suggesting that the bribery had been even more extensive, including $16 million in "donations" to local politicians and their organizations. They recommended opening a full investigation, and possibly notifying the Justice Department, as it appeared that both Mexican law and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) had been violated.
Executives at Walmart México chafed at the investigation, reportedly complaining that that was how business was done in the country. They told their counterparts at corporate headquarters that the investigators were being too aggressive, and some of the company's top executives apparently agreed. Feeling Walmart had had enough bad publicity in recent years, they allowed the investigation to be concluded by a short report from José Luis Rodríguezmacedo, the head of Walmart México, who had himself been suspected of involvement. It largely blamed Cicero, claiming he had fabricated the allegations to conceal his own embezzlement from the company with the help of the gestores, one of whom was his wife's law partner. Some Walmart executives found the report incomplete and contradictory, but the investigation was closed. None of the Mexican executives investigated were ever disciplined, and some were even promoted afterwards.
In December 2011, several months before the story broke, Walmart announced it had begun an internal review of its FCPA compliance procedures. It was unclear how the Justice Department might respond. While the FCPA's five-year statute of limitations appeared to bar prosecution under that statute, falsified financial statements in the years since could be seen as obstruction of justice under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and acts taken to conceal the bribery investigation subsequent to 2007 could constitute conspiracy.
Product selection 
Walmart's product selection has been criticized by some groups in the past, primarily as viewed as a promotion of a particular ideology or as a response to its original rural, religious and conservative target market. In 2003, Walmart removed certain men's magazines from its shelves, such as Maxim, FHM, and Stuff, citing customer complaints regarding their racy content. Later that year, it decided to partly obscure the covers of Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, and Redbook on store shelves due to "customer concerns", and refused to stock an issue of Sports Illustrated's swimsuit special because it took exception to one photograph. It has also refused to sell the December 2011 issue of WWE Magazine due to its controversial cover depicting The Rock doused with fire.
Since 1991, Walmart also has not carried music albums marked with the Recording Industry Association of America's (RIAA's) Parental Advisory Label (contradictory to the allowance of R-rated movies and video games rated Mature), although it carries edited versions of such albums, with obscenities removed or overdubbed with less offensive lyrics. In one example in 2005, Walmart rejected the original cover of country singer Willie Nelson's reggae album, Countryman, which featured marijuana leaves, in an apparent pro-marijuana statement. To satisfy Walmart, the record label, Lost Highway Records, issued the album with an alternative cover, without recalling the original cover. Walmart has never carried Marilyn Manson albums, solely because of the controversy surrounding the group, but recently began selling Nine Inch Nails albums after rejecting them for years. In fact, some albums that do not carry "Parental Advisory" stickers, include profanities and are not edited. Such albums include Pink Floyd's The Dark Side of the Moon and Arctic Monkeys' Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not. In 2009 Green Day refused to make an edited version of their album 21st Century Breakdown for Walmart, with frontman Billie Joe Armstrong claiming "You feel like you're in 1953 or something", thus the album is not carried by Walmart stores. However, Walmart's policy on carrying albums with the Parental Advisory Label seems to vary by country, as albums containing the label can be found in Canadian Walmart stores, for example.
In 1999, Walmart announced that it would not stock emergency contraception pills in its pharmacies, not citing any particular reasons except for a "business decision" that was made earlier. The move was criticized by family planning advocates, citing that women in small towns where Walmart pharmacies had little competition would have greater difficulties in obtaining the drug. The decision was challenged in 2006, as three Massachusetts women filed suit against the company after they were unable to purchase emergency contraception at their local Walmart stores, resulting in a ruling that required Walmart to stock the drug in all of its pharmacies in Massachusetts. Expecting that other states would soon do the same, Walmart reversed its policy and announced that it would begin to stock the drug nationwide, while at the same time maintaining its conscientious objection policy, allowing any Walmart pharmacy employee who does not feel comfortable dispensing a prescription to refer customers to another pharmacy.
Walmart has also been criticized for selling some controversial products. For example, in 2004 Walmart carried the anti-Semitic hoax The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in its online catalogue. The Jewish civil rights organization Anti-Defamation League wrote to the President of Walmart on September 2008 noting the text, "has been the major weapon in the arsenals of anti-Semites around the world," and called on Walmart to, "unequivocally state the nature of the book and to disassociate itself from any endorsement of it." Walmart stopped selling the book shortly thereafter.
In October 2004, Walmart canceled its order for The Daily Show's America (The Book) after discovering a page that depicts each US Supreme Court judge nude. A week later, it returned copies of comedian George Carlin's When Will Jesus Bring the Pork Chops?, with a cover recreating The Last Supper with Jesus' seat empty and Carlin seated next to it. The company claimed that the copies were shipped to it by mistake and a Walmart spokeswoman said she did not "believe this particular product would appeal" to its customer base.
In January 2006, Walmart was criticized for the recommendation system on its website which suggested that some black-related DVDs, such as Introducing Dorothy Dandridge and documentaries on Baptist minister and civil rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr. were similar to the Planet of the Apes television series DVD box set. It quickly corrected the page, saying that it was a software glitch, but ultimately blamed the matter on human error.
A December 2007 report published by the Environmental Investigation Agency (a non-governmental agency), revealed that some furniture sold at Walmart was made from wood which had been illegally logged in protected Russian habitats for Siberian tigers and other wildlife. This led the company to investigate its suppliers and promise to eliminate products made from illegal wood by 2013. They also joined the Global Forest & Trade Network, an organization that is dedicated to eliminating illegal logging.
Until the mid-1990s, Walmart took out corporate-owned life insurance policies on its employees including "low-level" employees such as janitors, cashiers, and stockers. This type of insurance is usually purchased to cover a company against financial loss when a high-ranking employee (i.e. management) dies, and is usually known as "Key Man Insurance." Critics derided Walmart as buying what they called "Dead Peasants Insurance" or "Janitor Insurance." Critics, as well as the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, charge that the company was trying to profit from the deaths of its employees, and take advantage of the tax law which allowed it to deduct the premiums. The practice was stopped in the mid-1990s when the federal government closed the tax deduction and began to pursue Walmart for back taxes.
Homage to Augusto Pinochet 
On January 3, 2011 it was discovered that the entrance to one of the holding corporate buildings of Walmart Chile had a plate in homage to Augusto Pinochet, ex-Chilean dictator responsible for various human rights abuses. Only after much controversy did Walmart Chile decide to remove the plate.
See also 
- Hell Comes to Quahog Family Guy Episode
- People of Walmart
- Something Wall-Mart This Way Comes
- Kabel, Marcus. "Wal-Mart, Critics Slam Each Other on Web." The Washington Post. July 18, 2006. Retrieved on July 31, 2006.
- Sellers, Jeff M. (April 22, 2005). "Women Against Wal-Mart." Christianity Today. Retrieved July 31, 2006.
- Sellers, Jeff M. (April 22, 2005). "Deliver Us from Wal-Mart?." Christianity Today.. Retrieved on July 31, 2006.
- Norman, Al (2004). "The Case Against Wal-Mart". Raphel Marketing, p. 7. ISBN 0-9711542-3-6.
- Copeland, Larry. (March 13, 2006). "Wal-Mart's hired advocate takes flak." USA Today. Retrieved on July 31, 2006.
- Rodino Associates. (October 28, 2003). "Final Report on Research for Big Box Retail/Superstore Ordinance[dead link]." Los Angeles City Council. Retrieved on July 31, 2006.
- Smith, Hedrick. "Who Calls the Shots in the Global Economy?" PBS. Retrieved on July 31, 2006.
- walmartfacts.com (official public relations website)
- Barnaro, Michael. (November 1, 2005). "A New Weapon for Wal-Mart: A War Room." The New York Times. Retrieved on August 1, 2006.
- Barbaro, Michael. (March 7, 2006). "Wal-Mart Enlists Bloggers in P.R. Campaign." The New York Times. Retrieved on August 1, 2006.
- Boaz, David. (November 8, 1996). "Chrysler, Microsoft, and Industrial Policy." Cato Institute. Retrieved on August 17, 2006.
- Bandow, Doug. (March 26, 1997). "Can 'Unbridled Capitalism' Be Tamed?" Cato Institute. Retrieved on August 17, 2006.
- Washburn, Gary; Meyer, H. Gregory. (September 1, 2004). "Walmart hasn't written off city." Chicago Tribune. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Baldacci, Leslie. (January 26, 2006). "Thousands apply for jobs at new Walmart." Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.[dead link]
- "Walmart Stores, Inc. vs. American Drugs, Inc.: Arkansas Supreme Court Decision". (Case No. 94-235). Arkansas Supreme Court. January 9, 1995. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.[dead link]
- Staff Writer. (October 1, 2001). "Walmart Settles Predatory Pricing Charge." The Hometown Advantage. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.[dead link]
- Staff Writer. (February 1, 2003). "German High Court Convicts Walmart of Predatory Pricing[dead link]". The Hometown Advantage. Retrieved on August 4, 2006. Archived October 27, 2005 at the Wayback Machine[dead link]
- Buckley, Frank; Jamie McShane, Parija Bhatnagar (April 7, 2004). "No smiles for Walmart in California". CNN. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Taylor, Peter Shawn. (February 20, 2006). "Freedom to shop". National Post. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Wallworth, Adam. (June 3, 2005). "Protesters hit streets to march against Walmart[dead link]". Northwest Arkansas Times. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Rosencrans, Willy. (August 31, 2004). "Walmart Supercenter rammed[dead link]". Asheville Global Report. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Roselle, Jody; Kerrie Frisinger. (May 26, 2005). "Walmart receives bomb scare". The Ithaca Journal. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.[dead link]
- Sobel, Russell S.; Andrea M. Dean. "Has Walmart Buried Mom and Pop?: The Impact of Walmart on Self Employment and Small Establishments in the United States[dead link]." West Virginia University. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- McKinley, Jr., James C. (September 28, 2004). "No, the Conquistadors Are Not Back. It's Just Walmart". The New York Times. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Staff Writer. (November 5, 2004). "Shoppers rush to pyramid Walmart". BBC News. Retrieved on September 5, 2006
- Stevenson, Mark. (November 4, 2004). "Despite months of protests, Walmart-owned store opens near Mexico's pyramids[dead link]". San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Staff Writer. (November 8, 2004). "Mexicans Protest Walmart Opening Near Ancient Pyramids". Democracy Now! Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- (February 13, 2007). "Walmart / Lowe's Shopping Center Destroys Native American Cemetery[dead link]". Alliance for Native American Indian Rights. Retrieved on September 30, 2007. Archived September 29, 2007 at the Wayback Machine[dead link]
- East, Jim. (May 7, 2001. "Builder's transfer of land for park expected in fall". The Tennesseean. Retrieved on September 30, 2007.[dead link]
- "Group wants Walmart to stabilize Kilbuck site". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. September 26, 2007.
- kdka.com – Walmart Won't Develop Kilbuck Twp. Site[dead link]
- Walmart a go in Beaver County – Pittsburgh Business Times
- Associated Press, May 19, 2010, http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jVwU1ju0oUHJIcQI9t7NyTLkBZcAD9FQ7GV80
- Staff Writer. (September 28, 2000). "Crest Foods sues Walmart claiming predatory pricing[dead link]." The Oklahoma City Journal Record. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Staff Writer. (August 1, 2002). "Mexico Investigates Walmart for Antitrust Violations[dead link]." The Hometown Advantage. Retrieved on August 4, 2006. Archived September 29, 2007 at the Wayback Machine[dead link]
- Lynn, Barry C. (July 2006). "Breaking the Chain: The antitrust case against Walmart". Harper's Magazine. Retrieved on September 5, 2006.
- "Side Effects at the Pharmacy". Nytimes.com. 2006-11-30. Retrieved 2012-05-05.
- "Store Wars: When Walmart Comes to Town." PBS. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Keil, Stanley R., Spector, Lee C. The Impact of Walmart on Income and Unemployment Differentials in Alabama. Review of Regional Studies; Winter 2005, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p336-355, 20p.
- "[dead link]
- Tejada, Carlos; Gary McWilliams. (June 26, 2003). "Well-Paid Professionals Draw Unwelcome Attention". The Wall Street Journal (Career Journal). Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- "Walmart Increases Start Rates at 1,200 Facilities". Walmart Facts. 2006-08-07. Retrieved 2011-09-12.
- Bianco, Anthony; Zellner, Wendy. "Is Walmart Too Powerful?" Business Week. October 6, 2003. Retrieved on September 29, 2007.
- "Is Walmart Good for America?". Pbs.org. 2004-11-16. Retrieved 2011-09-12.
- Staff Writer. (August 7, 2006). "Walmart increases starting pay, adds wage caps". USA Today. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- December 23, 2008. Wal-Mart Settles 63 Lawsuits Over Wages. The New York Times.
- "The Walmart Revolution: How Big-Box Stores Benefit Consumers, Workers, and the Economy". Booktv.org. Retrieved 2012-05-05.
- "The Walmart Tax: A Review of Studies Examining Employers' Health Care Cost-Shifting[dead link]." AFL-CIO. March 31, 2005. Retrieved on September 29, 2007.
- Bailey, Lynn. (April–June 2004). "The Extra Costs Behind "Everyday Low Prices![dead link]" The South Carolina Nurse. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.
- Arindrajit, Dube; Ken Jacobs. (August 2, 2004). "Hidden Cost of Walmart Jobs". University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved on August 4, 2006.[dead link]
- Raine, George. (August 3, 2004). "Walmarts Cost State, Study Says". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved on November 30, 2006.
- Shaulis, Joe (2008-09-05). "Mexico Supreme Court orders Wal-Mart to stop paying workers in store vouchers". Jurist. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart to face employee suit in Missouri." USA Today. November 2, 2005. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart Hit With $78M Fine." CBS News. October 13, 2006. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart Loses Unpaid Overtime Case." CBS News. December 20, 2002. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Greenhouse, Steven (2008-07-01). "Walmart Faces Fine in Minnesota Suit". NY Times. Retrieved 2008-07-01.
- Tosh, Mark. "Pharmacists win wage battle with Walmart—for now." Drug Store News. August 30, 1999. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Gogoi, Pallavi. "Walmart Workers Walk Out." MSNBC. October 18, 2006. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- "Wal Mart's open door policy". Pbs.org. Retrieved 2011-09-12.
- Miller, George. "Everyday Low Wages: The Hidden Price We All Pay For Walmart[dead link]." United States House of Representatives. February 16, 2004. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Greenhouse, Steven. "Workers Assail Night Lock-Ins by Walmart." The New York Times. January 18, 2004. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Greenhouse, Steven. "In-House Audit Says Walmart Violated Labor Laws." The New York Times. January 13, 2004. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Nordlinger, Jay. "The New Colossus." National Review. April 5, 2004. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- "Papers Suggest Walmart Knew of Illegal Workers." (subscription required) Wall Street Journal. November 5, 2005. Retrieved on April 1, 2007.
- Staff Writer. "250 arrested at Walmart." CNN. October 23, 2003. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Green, Cynthia. "Federal Grand Jury Investigating Walmart’s Use of Undocumented Immigrants[dead link]." The Labor Research Association. November 12, 2003. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Staff Writer. "Police: Walmart site raided." CNN. November 18, 2005. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- "4 Walmart employees fired after disarming gunman caught shoplifting". KSL-TV. February 9, 2011. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
- "Fired Utah Walmart employees suing". Salt Lake Tribune. June 21, 2011. Retrieved May 17, 2013.
- "Walmart fires Michigan man for using medical marijuana". wzzm13.com. 2010-03-12. Retrieved 2012-05-05.
- Bernstein, Aaron. "A Stepped-Up Assault on Walmart." Business Week. October 20, 2005. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Wysocki, Bernard, Jr.; Zimmerman, Ann. "Walmart Cost-Cutting Finds Big Target in Health Benefits." Wall Street Journal. September 30, 2003. Retrieved on February 23, 2007.
- Bucher, Susan. "Walmart: the $288 billion welfare queen[dead link]." Tallahassee Democrat. April 19, 2005. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Leonard, Andrew. "How the World Works: Our right to know about Walmart." Salon.com. January 23, 2006. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Zellner, Wendy. "Walmart's Clean Bill of Health?" Business Week. February 10, 2005. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart memo: Unhealthy need not apply." CNN. October 26, 2005. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Staff Writer. "Md. forces Walmart to spend more on health." MSNBC. January 13, 2006. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- "Downloadable Audio of Walmart Statement on Maryland Health Plan Mandate." Walmart. July 21, 2006. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- Freking, Kevin. "Walmart to Offer More Health Coverage." ABC News. April 17, 2006. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.[dead link]
- Barbaro, Michael; Abelson, Reed. "Walmart Says Health Plan Is Covering More Workers." The New York Times. January 11, 2007. Retrieved on February 24, 2007.
- "Walmart To Include Birth Control In Employee Health Insurance Coverage Plan Beginning Jan. 1". Medical News Today. January 2, 2007.
- "Brain-damaged woman at center of Wal-Mart suit – CNN". Articles.cnn.com. 2008-03-25. Retrieved 2011-09-12.
- Andrews, Michelle (2008-04-0). "Walmart Rethinks Its Move on Deborah Shank". U. S. News and World Report. Retrieved 2008-04-03.[dead link]
- Shapiro, Lila (October 21, 2011). "Walmart's Cuts To Health Care For Part-Time Workers Mirror Larger Trend". Huffington Post.
- Hines, Alice (December 1, 2012). "Walmart's New Health Care Policy Shifts Burden To Medicaid, Obamacare". Huffington Post.
- Nazworth, Napp (December 3, 2012). "With 'Obamacare,' Walmart Shifts Employee Health Costs to Taxpayers Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/with-obamacare-walmart-shifts-employee-health-costs-to-taxpayers-85994/". Christian Post.
- Dicker, John. "Union Blues at Walmart[dead link]." The Nation. June 20, 2002. Retrieved on July 26, 2006. Archived April 17, 2005 at the Wayback Machine[dead link]
- "Walmart's Position on Unions (For U.S. Operations Only)." Walmart. October 31, 2006. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- Olsson, Karen. "Up Against Walmart." Mother Jones. March/April 2003. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- Lydersen, Kari. "Walmartyrs." In These Times. May 15, 2000. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- Greenhouse, Steven. "Judge Rules Against Walmart On Refusal to Talk to Workers." The New York Times. June 19, 2003. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- Bianco, Anthony. "No Union Please, We're Walmart." Business Week. February 13, 2006. Retrieved on July 26, 2006.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart faces Canadian labour clash." MSNBC. April 30, 2006. Retrieved on July 26, 2006.[dead link]
- Austen, Ian. "Quebec panel rejects Walmart store closing." International Herald Tribune. September 20, 2005. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- Barbaro, Michael. "Was Walmart's Anti-Union Image Used as a Shield?" The New York Times. January 9, 2006. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- 'Former Walmart Exec Sentenced for Theft'." Washington Post. August 11, 2006. Retrieved on August 11, 2006
- Fairlamb, David with Laura Cohn "A Bumpy Ride in Europe." BusinessWeek. October 6, 2003. Retrieved on July 27, 2006.
- Norton, Kate. "Walmart's German Retreat." Business Week. July 28, 2006. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- Cheng, Allen T.; Spears, Lee. "Walmart to Allow Unions in China." The Washington Post. August 10, 2006. Retrieved on March 2, 2007.
- "Walmart SEC Form 10-Q." United States Securities and Exchange Commission. October 31, 2005. Retrieved on July 31, 2006.
- Membership required:Trade unions in China, The Economist, Jul 31, 2008
- Wal-Mart fights back as Black Friday strike nears – CSMonitor.com
- Fishman, Charles. "The Walmart You Don't Know." Fast Company. December 2003. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- "Is Walmart Good for America?" PBS. November 16, 2004. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Jingjing, Jiang. "Walmart's China inventory to hit $18b this year." China Daily. November 29, 2004. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Scott, Robert E. "U.S.-China Trade, 1989–2003: Impact on jobs and industries, nationally and state-by-state." Economic Policy Institute. January 2005. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Serna, Liberty; Moser, Paul. "Paying the Price at Walmart: Walmart's Imports Lead to U.S. Jobs Exports[dead link]." AFL-CIO. 2006. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart's Impact on the Economy." Walmart. 2006. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Palast, Gregory. "Praise Uncle Sam and pass the 18p an hour." The Guardian. June 20, 1999. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Bernstein, Aaron. "A Major Swipe At Sweatshops." Business Week. May 23, 2005. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Berner, Robert. "Can Walmart Wear a White Hat?." Business Week. September 22, 2005. Retrieved on August 29, 2006.
- Norwegian Ministry of Finance (2006-06-06). "Two companies – Walmart and Freeport – are being excluded from the Norwegian Government Pension Fund – Global’s investment universe".
- Vivienne Walt, Fortune Magazine (2006-07-24). "Norway to Walmart: We don't want your shares". CNN.
- Documents Undermine Walmart Account on Deadly Bangladesh Fire | The Nation
- 3 Walmart Suppliers Made Goods in Bangladesh Factory – NYTimes.com
- Bangladeshis Mourn Garment-Fire Dead, Plan Protest – ABC News
- Barstow, David (April 22, 2012). "Vast Mexico Bribery Case Hushed Up by Wal-Mart After Top-Level Struggle". The New York Times. Retrieved April 24, 2012.
- Barstow, David (December 17, 2012). "The Bribery Aisle: How Wal-Mart Used Payoffs To Get Its Way in Mexico". The New York Times. Retrieved December 17, 2012.
- Henning, Peter (April 23, 2012). "Weighing the Legal Ramifications of the Wal-Mart Bribery Case". The New York Times. Retrieved April 24, 2012.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart banishes bawdy mags." CNN. May 6, 2003. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.
- Younge, Gary. "When Walmart comes to town". The Guardian. August 18, 2003. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.
- Schneid, Scott. "Ratings Soup – Music II." Family Media Guide. July 26, 2005. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.
- Hall, Sarah. "Walmart Tweaks Willie's Reggae." E! July 12, 2005. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.[dead link]
- Staff Writer. "Walmart: No Morning-After Pill." CBS News. May 14, 1999. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.
- Staff Writer. "Walmart To Stock Morning-After Pill: Giant Retailer Reverses Earlier Policy Following Mass. Lawsuit." CBS News. March 3, 2006. Retrieved on 2007-11-23.
- "A Hoax of Hate". Jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Retrieved 2012-05-05.
- Anti-Defamation League [dead link] "Letter to Walmart RE: The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" September 21, 2008, Retrieved on February 21, 2009
- Staff Writer. "Carlin's no joke for Walmart." CNN. October 28, 2004. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.
- Mui, Ylan Q. "Walmart Blames Web Site Incident on Employee's Error." The Washington Post. January 7, 2006. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.
- "Attention Wal-Mart Shoppers. How Wal-Mart's Sourcing Practices Encourage Illegal Logging and Threaten Endangered Species.". Environmental Information Agency Report. 2007. Retrieved August 8, 2012.
- Holahan, Catherine (December 11, 2009). "What Not to Buy at Walmart.". CBS News. Retrieved August 8, 2012.
- Reynolds, Frank. "Walmart Gambled, Lost $1.3B on 'Dead Peasant' Policies, Insurers Say." Andrews Publications. September 8, 2005. Retrieved on September 29, 2006.
- "Valech Report". Minvu.cl. Retrieved 2011-09-12.
- "Outrage at plate in homage of Augusto Pinochet in Walmart Chile headquarters". Theclinic.cl. 2010-12-30. Retrieved 2012-05-05.
|Find more about Walmart at Wikipedia's sister projects|
|Definitions and translations from Wiktionary|
|Media from Commons|
|Learning resources from Wikiversity|
|News stories from Wikinews|
|Quotations from Wikiquote|
|Source texts from Wikisource|
|Textbooks from Wikibooks|
|Travel information from Wikivoyage|
- Is Walmart Good For America?
- WalmartWorkforce.org Where Associates Learn How to Live Better
- Walmart Watch
- Articles, Studies and Resources on Walmart
- Moms vs. Walmart
- Sprawl Busters
- Federal Competition Commission
- Discounting Rights: Walmart's Violation of US Workers’ Right to Freedom of Association
- Watch the documentary Wal-Town
- News articles
- Abuse of Workers simply put
- Could the "Walmart Effect" impact Real Estate?
- How Costco Became the Anti-Walmart
- In Walmart's America
- Stop the Attack on Walmart
- The Costco Alternative
- The Walmart You Don't Know
- Walmart to cut ties with Bangladesh factories using child labour
- What's Good for Walmart...
- The Man Who Said No to Walmart
- Walmart sustainability programme faces criticism