User talk:Destin

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		I awarded this to honor this user's tireless speedy deleting. Toa Zach 16:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

S. H. Couch

Hi Destin ... In 2009 you posted a stub for S.H. Couch company. I've spent some time digging around and building up the stub. It is my first Wikipedia article. Would you look at it and see what you think? Thanks! GanderMusings (talk) 16:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)GanderMusings[reply]

Unfairly Deleted

Hi Destin... You deleted my OrangeCup page because you said it was a repost of the same page that had been discussed and deleted prior but that was not at all the case. The article i first posted was full of errors so i made a drastic change to the content and included only unbiased views on the product... In order to make claims like you did on my page, I would suggest you make sure your information is correct and that you check with previous versions of pages before you delete them. --Orangeisgreen (talk) 18:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletions

Hi, Destin! I've noticed that you've been trying to improve Wikipedia by nominating articles for speedy deletion. However, the reasons that you're using do not match the official policies regarding nominating an article for SD. I don't disagree with the articles you've nominated--many of them do deserve deletion--but your reasons for deleting them aren't official WP policy. Please review the SD policies, and make use of the SD templates when nominating an article. Thanks! -- Merope 15:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletions

Thanks for your close attention to under-detailed sites, but I don't think you can call for the deletion of a site within the first ten minutes for its creation! Thanks! -Srsrsr 16:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC) --I see you really wanted that page gone. Any reasonable explanation? -Srsrsr 17:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

meaning of tags

hi destin, you placed the tags {{wikify}} and {{cleanup}} to Masteria, which i created earlier this day. i'd really like to know:

what do you want to wikify?

there is not one word where wikifying makes sense that is *not* wikified.

what do you want to clean up?

the article consists of a taxobox, two very short paragraphs, and a species list. i have no idea at all how this could be cleaned up.

please explain :) cheers --Sarefo 22:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Star Instruments and Star instruments

You don't want to create two separate articles, because down the road someone may update one, and not the other. Since it's a proper (corporate) name, the one with the capital I should be the primary one. I've changed the other one so it simply redirects. That way, you only need to maintain one article, not two. Fan-1967 21:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion of 64Digits and warning of me

Well, 64digits was in the list of requested articles. Also, I did not create that website. Therefore, I had a perfect right to create the stub, and you should do your research before jumping to conclusions and accusing me of self-promotion. Thank you.

Re: Sugarwood

No, I'm not an admin. I thought that users were allowed to post "temporarily blocked" tags. I'm a little confused on the whole subject. If you could tell me, I'd appreciate it.

Thanks, Destin 18:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, all friends here. No, only admins have the power to block users, and therefore only admins should post block notices. The posting of such a block does not of itself block the user, and if he finds a block notice but also finds that he can still edit (which he would) this undermines the whole vandal-warning structure. Certainly we welcome anyone who is interested in maintaining the integrity of our encyclopedia, and thank you for your efforts. The correct approach, under wiki rules, is to post four warnings, of increasing levels of firmness. They are described as "general note", "caution", "warning" and "final warning". You will find the list at WP:TT. If a vandal persists after receiving four warnings, and if an Admin does not appear spontaneously, you seek admin help at WP:AIV. The usual admin response time is less than five minutes - often much less. Incidentally, an admin has, at my request, blocked your friend. I am not myself an admin either. Any more advice you need, please feel free to ask me. If I don't know the answer, I will know someone who does. Happy wikying.--Anthony.bradbury 18:35, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to warn you that WP:TT is 29 pages long!--Anthony.bradbury 18:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I thought it worked something like that. Destin 19:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sugarwood

Hi there; I notice that you are not signing your name to vandal warnings sent to this editor. I also notice that you have told him he is temporarily blocked. Please forgive me for asking, but your userpage does not say; are you an admin? Because if not, telling a user that you are will get you blocked, however much the other user may deserve the penalty--Anthony.bradbury 17:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is also true that Wiki policy, broadly speaking, requires four warnings to be delivered before a block is imposed (there are exceptions).--Anthony.bradbury 18:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:NoAdware.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:NoAdware.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Zonealarm6.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zonealarm6.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 15:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Blackscreenofdeath.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Blackscreenofdeath.PNG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Beryl wobbly.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Beryl wobbly.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ysangkok 17:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I listed it for deletion because it is being moved to Wikimedia Commons :P. --Ysangkok 19:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image will not be lost, and it will still be available on Wikipedia. --Ysangkok 19:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joyce Piven

Hi. I'm assuming you just tagged this in error but I'm asking that you lift the speedy deletion tag from Joyce Piven. In the stub article I included her involvement in the Compass Players (all of which have wikipedia articles), her teaching of celebrities John Cusack, Jeremy Piven, and others, and her role as the Artistic Director of Piven Theatre Workshop which of course also has an article. Her husband who is just as notable also has an article.--Twintone 16:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shady Rest Hotel

The article Shady Rest Hotel may qualify for a speedy under other criteria (no context, for instance), but the subject is legitimate (I'm old enough to have watched the show) and it is not spam. It would be hard to have spam for a business that doesn't exist in real life. Let this article sit for a while and let the author develop it. It may need to be merged into the main show article later. Realkyhick 16:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That'll get you every time. :-) Realkyhick 03:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HipHopDX.com

This page was created in response to it being placed top of the list at Wikipedia:Most wanted articles. It is linked to by hundreds of pages. I know very little about it, but this suggests to me that the article should stay. Jdcooper 16:52, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the page and it did appear to be have the qualities of spam. I belive with a rewrite the article could not be mistaked for spam. Toa Zach 20:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Hey, destin, I hope you don't mind, but I used you on my user page. Check it out sometime. Toa Zach 17:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Pclos07.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pclos07.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Pclinuxos desktop.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pclinuxos desktop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Image:Zonefirewall.JPG

This image you uploaded, displays a customized Windows skin. Did you use WindowsBlinds for it? And if you did, what skin is it called? Thanks! --Antoshi~! ^{T | C} 14:48, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Google infiniteloop.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Google infiniteloop.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Phoeba Wright^OBJECTION! 06:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Picture1uq9.png

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Picture1uq9.png, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Picture1uq9.png has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Picture1uq9.png itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. CSDWarnBot 01:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Vmwareunity.png

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Vmwareunity.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 23:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vmwareunity.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vmwareunity.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mac OS 11

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I have nominated Mac OS 11 for deletion. It is in violation of WP:CRYSTAL, as Apple has not announced any plans for an OS 11 or Os XI. Mac OS X could indeed continue on as Mac Os X 11.0 or even Mac OS X 10.10. ANDROS¹³³⁷ 22:22, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vista-aeroglass.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vista-aeroglass.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:1332950747_1a89e36b45.jpg

Hi,
Is this an image that you have taken yourself?

Thanks

--DogGunn 13:41, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

iPod touch

Speedy deletion of Image:1375444600 fb279416ae.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:1375444600 fb279416ae.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. TCC (talk) (contribs) 07:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Acceleratorsleave.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Acceleratorsleave.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:L 864dfaa7825ec6818057f7f1571cfaaa.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:L 864dfaa7825ec6818057f7f1571cfaaa.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ρх₥α 23:12, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Microslop

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Microslop, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. meshach 20:24, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Zonefirewall.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zonefirewall.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Save-Me-Oprah ^(talk) 04:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC) --Save-Me-Oprah ^(talk) 04:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Zonefirewall.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zonefirewall.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Image.x3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Image.x3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ewido.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ewido.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Acceleratorsalbum.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Acceleratorsalbum.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

System Sensor

A tag has been placed on System Sensor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of System Sensor and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Barack Obama, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Erik the Red 2 (AVE·CAESAR) 21:51, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page Patrolling

Hello, I noticed you have been patrolling/tagging a lot of new pages for speedy deletion. However, you are not marking these pages as "Patrolled" when you do so. Please do so, as it prevents the (minor, but still present) inconvenience of checking new articles that have already been checked. Thanks! Jamiebijania (talk) 13:51, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Snapshot6.png

File:Snapshot6.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Pclos0731.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Pclos0731.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:05, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Connells1987.png

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Connells1987.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 23:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair-use image

Hi, File:L 864dfaa7825ec6818057f7f1571cfaaa.jpg is nominated for deletion. Regards Hekerui (talk) 09:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Leopardls.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Leopardls.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 00:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Acceleratorsleave.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Acceleratorsleave.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Leetsdaleelementary.png

Thank you for uploading File:Leetsdaleelementary.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Faraday (company)

A tag has been placed on Faraday (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alastair Rae (talk) 16:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Silent Knight (company)

I have nominated Silent Knight (company), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silent Knight (company). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 19:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Snapshot5.png

Thanks for uploading File:Snapshot5.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Congratulations (album). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. F-22 Raptör^{Aces High♠} 14:15, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Broadview Security

Okay, the assertions you are inserting into the article may very well be true, but you need to find reliable sources for that. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:51, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Destin. You have new messages at Jauerback's talk page.
Message added 14:59, 22 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Prorat.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Prorat.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Ipatrol (talk) 20:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pittsburgh event for Wikipedia's tenth anniversary

Hi! Since you're listed as a Wikipedian in Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!--ragesoss (talk) 15:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Connellsboylan.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Connellsboylan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:30, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Marissa-nadler-5th-album.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marissa-nadler-5th-album.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh

WikiProject Pittsburgh		An invitation to join us!
		You are invited to participate in WikiProject Pittsburgh, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about the City of Pittsburgh and the surrounding Western Pennsylvania area. Please see the Pittsburgh WikiProject page for more information. See yinz there!

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:31, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 50 Words for Snow

The article 50 Words for Snow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased self-published album lacking notability established through significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Subject does not meet the topical notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cind.amuse (Cindy) 14:15, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Destin! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

File:Ubuntu Edgy.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ubuntu Edgy.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spacecube.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spacecube.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:08, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo source question

Did you take this photo yourself? If not, where did it come from? Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:04, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Home (BoDeans album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jim Scott and Outside Looking In (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Go Slow Down, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited John Schultz (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raleigh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited George Huntley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Don Dixon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Autopilot (The Samples album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sean Kelly

Outpost (The Samples album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sean Kelly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Minivmac.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Minivmac.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 06:57, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amped Across America

The article Amped Across America has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musical release. No evidence of awards. No evidence of charting. No evidence of full-length professional reviews.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amped Across America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amped Across America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amped Across America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Honeywell Life Safety Group

The article Honeywell Life Safety Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable business unit. No independent refs. No reliably sourced content to merge with parent.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:30, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ampedacrossamerica.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ampedacrossamerica.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fake security camera

The article Fake security camera has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, full of original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlListChecket (talk) 12:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In Thrall, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alternative and American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guadalcanal Diary (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamboree (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

question about fire-lite alarms

i was just wondering: what year were the bg-12 pull stations released? i have wanted to know for a long time now. i was also wondering what year did fire lite become a part of Honeywell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 970796yvdtm (talk • contribs) 18:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

thank you for helping em with understanding the bg-12 better.i just have one last question:did/does wheelock make a weatherproof alarm for their NS series? i tried to find a document on it but could not find one.thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 970796yvdtm (talk • contribs) 23:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Black and white photo of Quaker Valley Middle School from 2003.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

BoDeans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mike Campbell

Outside Looking In (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Mike Campbell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BoDeans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Leahy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

identifying two alarms

hi! i need help identifying two alarms i recently acquired. one of them is made by pyrotronics and the model number is DTR-136. i was wondering if you have heard of it. i have tried to look it up but cannot find any document on it. it is basically a re-branded simplex 4255-1. the next alarms is a interesting wheelock ZNS. it is a wall mount alarms,however,it is 15-30-75-95 candela no 15-30-75-110 candela. i looked it up on wheelocks website and they said all wall mount indoor alarms are either 15-30-75-110 or 15/75 candela and all ceiling mount alarms are 15-75-30-95 candela. do you know how this happened? thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 970796yvdtm (talk • contribs) 13:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Sugarplastic, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Cooper, Geffen and Squeeze (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of McAfee Personal Firewall Plus

The article McAfee Personal Firewall Plus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability since 2006 and no prospects of ever becoming a full article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa (talk) 10:32, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BoDeans 1991.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BoDeans 1991.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:BoDeans 1991.png

Thanks for uploading File:BoDeans 1991.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Company

The article Benjamin Electric Manufacturing Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of System Sensor

The article System Sensor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edwards (company)

The article Edwards (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Edwardslogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Edwardslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ErrMess Remote Computer

The article ErrMess Remote Computer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG with no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 22:34, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NoAdware

The article NoAdware has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This product doesn't pass the WP:GNG notability guideline; WP:RS citations is a passing mention.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FalconK (talk) 08:18, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NoAdware.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NoAdware.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Destin,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Destin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quakervalleyold56.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Quakervalleyold56.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 18:43, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bodeans-i can't stop.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bodeans-i can't stop.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bodeansamericanmade.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bodeansamericanmade.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indigo-dreams.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indigo-dreams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Destin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Destin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Destin. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

His Steveness listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect His Steveness. Since you had some involvement with the His Steveness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 04:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Deadcomp.PNG

The file File:Deadcomp.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 07:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Space Age Electronics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Space Age Electronics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. StarM 18:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SAELogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SAELogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paddy Bush for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paddy Bush is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paddy Bush until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wotanluzo (talk) 10:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ewido Networks

The article Ewido Networks has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]