User talk:Iztwoz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Iztwoz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! E4024 (talk) 19:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Help Me[edit]

Pictogram resolved.svg
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

how do I retrieve sentence from a ref where it ended up Ref 4 petrichor

The sentence was accidentally included in the reference code. I've fixed the issue. Let me know if it's working now. m.o.p 22:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capybara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 19:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that—that's why I butted in.
Yes, page is Mara (mammal);" the disambiguation page is "A long page"!
Cheers! –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard| 20:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Microorganism[edit]

Hi Iztwoz. Please exercise due caution and diligence before removing a reliable source. You recently removed a reliable source from Microorganism on the grounds that there was another source which was "more easily accessed". That is not an acceptable reason for removing a reliable source. In addition, a quick search on the article's title in Google Scholar showed a full view of the article you removed was accessible online. Regards. --Epipelagic (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Help request[edit]

Pictogram resolved.svg
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

how do I move a picture which is blocking the proper working of a bulleted list? at the moment it is on the left side of page there might be room on the right side for it or if it is ok to remove picture how is this done - please

I have moved this down - new entries should go at the bottom of a talk page. See WP:Picture tutorial for advice about placing images. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Iztwoz. You have new messages at Kinkreet's talk page.
Message added 23:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kinkreet~♥moshi moshi♥~ 23:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

I know articles on Wikipedia do not belong to anyone, but I do have a personal attachment to the Progeroid syndrome article. So I want to personally thank you for taking your time out to copy-edit it and correct any mistakes I made. I want to let you know I appreciate it! Kinkreet~♥moshi moshi♥~ 17:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Iztwoz. You have new messages at Talk:Viṣṇu_Smṛti#Requested_move.
Message added 18:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shouldn't it be Smriti Redtigerxyz Talk 18:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Currently the article uses IAST. If we move to Indian English spellings, we have to use Vishnu and Smriti. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rumi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Iztwoz. You have new messages at User talk:Graham87/Import.
Message added 07:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Graham87 07:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Typos[edit]

Hi. I've reverted your recent edits to the Mahabharata article, in which the only reason given was 'typos'. What you changed were not typo's but use of IAST, which is common through the article. Policy on this has never been agreed and there is very good reason for some usage in this article. Some articles such as Pāṇini are named in this format. I note that you have made similar changes elsewhere where IAST is used. Please consider carefully if it is appropriate to make such changes. Thanks. Imc (talk) 06:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your post today[edit]

Hi Iztwoz!
Many thanks for your kind message and comment on my page.
Pleased to see how well you have settled in. Cheers! –
 – Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 11:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

CopyeditorStar7.PNG The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For your tireless work with the Guild of Copyeditors, I award you this barnstar. Your selfless copyediting is an invaluable resource to the community. Neelix (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much[edit]

I appreciate your help on Lower limbs venous ultrasonography. Doc Elisa 20:36, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Your help is priceless and I have no words to say how much I'm grateful. Doc Elisa 21:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Hyper-debit is the situation were there is an augmentation of the debit in one vein. An exemple of hyper-debit is the presence of an arterio-venous fistula. Another example is in a situation of deep venous thrombosis: the superficial venous system is called to drain much more blood than usually - veins can be enlarged but valves can be intact. Eye image or eye sign is the same thing. We can use "eye sign" as it is on papers. Thank you again Doc Elisa 20:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Peer req: Sex + Water Pollution[edit]

Howdy! Found you listed as a potential volunteer for science / biology related topics - If you have a moment, I'd like to get some more eyes looking at the peer review of Sex effects of water pollution, it appears to be a bit quackery/bias-heavy, but I don't know if it qualifies for deletion outright because of that... Cheers, —Hobart (talk) 15:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg Thanks for helping my students with their article Beautiful Store. They told me they are very grateful for your assistance! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Allow Me[edit]

Apologies if I caused any edit conflicts during your copy edit. I had forgotten about my outstanding request for the copy edit, since the article had already undergone the Good article nomination process. (I work on so many articles at once, I forgot!) I am so glad to have you working on the article, and I will wait until you have finished to see all of your edits and ask any questions I may have. I did remove "very" (which you added) from the lead, referring to the reception, and I also removed the comma before "Public Art Collection" since the source did not include the punctuation (and the lead became inconsistent with the infobox). Let me know your thoughts! Thanks for your contributions to the article. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

If you'll let me know when you are finished, I will be sure to add the GOCE template to the article's talk page. Thanks again! --Another Believer (Talk) 22:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Copyeditor Barnstar Hires.png The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thank you for working on the Allow Me article! Another Believer (Talk) 19:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Hinduism[edit]

Thanks! I'd put in many references due to the continuous edit-wars at India-related articles. Greetings, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:46, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lower limbs venous ultrasonography[edit]

The article Lower limbs venous ultrasonography you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Lower limbs venous ultrasonography for comments about the article. Well done! SpinningSpark 17:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Unipolar brush cell was accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Unipolar brush cell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 01:02, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Asura[edit]

Hello Iztwoz, please join the discussion at Talk:Asura#Capitalization. Thank you, SchreiberBike talk 21:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Nefarious: Merchant of Souls[edit]

Hi Iztwoz,

Thank you again for copyediting the Nefarious: Merchant of Souls article. I have submitted the article for a featured article candidacy here. Any constructive comments you would be willing to provide there would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 12:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Iztwoz,
Thank you very much for contributing to the Nefarious: Merchant of Souls FAC. The article has been featured and I have nominated it to go up on the main page here.
Neelix (talk) 22:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Detritivore may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '', or '''saprophages''', are [[heterotroph]]s that obtain [[nutrient]]s by consuming [[detritus]] (decomposing plant and animal parts as well as [[feces]].<ref>Wetzel, R. G. 2001. Limnology: Lake

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:32, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Germinal stage[edit]

Hello Iztwoz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Germinal stage for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Human embryogenesis.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Pahazzard (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Please consider adding your valuable contributions to the articles: Human embryogenesis and Prenatal development Pahazzard (talk) 14:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are interested in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

Sobo 1909 589.png
  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article.
  • Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages!--LT910001 (talk) 12:09, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Caenorhabditis elegans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Mating behaviour
Human embryogenesis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Gut

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coelom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epidermis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Help required(Grammar department)[edit]

Could you help me out in these articles?

  1. Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences
  2. Kolkata Metro

Guru-45 (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch!I'll fix what I can.Guru-45 (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
Thanks for your recent edits to Anatomy articles, they're really helping to improve their overall quality and readability. Keep up the good work! LT910001 (talk) 13:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Repairing links after moving a page[edit]

I haven't cleaned anything up... Lesion (talk) 15:49, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human lung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trachea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Cervix[edit]

Hi Iztwoz! I'm working on getting Cervix up to GA-status, but I'm having a bit of trouble and was wondering if a second pair of eyes could help. I've inherited the Function section and I'm not quite happy with how it looks, but I'm really not sure what to do with it. I was wondering, if you had time, whether you could cast your eyes over that section (and maybe the rest of the article if you had time) and give it a bit of a run-over? I more-or-less think that the formatting is quite strange, but am not sure where to go. I'd be very grateful, editing can get somewhat lonely sometimes! --LT910001 (talk) 00:02, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Digestive system (human)[edit]

Human gastrointestinal tract seems to cover that exact topic area, you know... Dolescum (talk) 16:25, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

There are in the Digestion article's section on human digestion, though. Dolescum (talk) 16:41, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing this out, Dolescum. I've started a discussion on this at WP:ANATOMY, here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anatomy#Organization_of_Gastrointestinal_tract_articles. I personally feel we need a Human digestive system and Gastrointestinal tract article, as we do have articles on other systems. One solution might be to move some of the content from Digestion to Digestive system. Anyhow, please feel free to discuss this at the link above - hopefully we can centralise the discussion about this there. --LT910001 (talk) 08:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human digestive system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diaphragm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

GA[edit]

Thanks for your many, many copyedits and alterations to Cervix. I have completed the history section, made some final changes, and nominated Cervix for GA. Wish us luck! --LT910001 (talk) 00:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cervix, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Labour and Parity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

A-ha! A new venture?[edit]

Thoracic diaphragm. Eep! Such an important structure for life, and yet such a poor article! Also one of our top 200 articles (always nice to know), and I think this article could be improved without much intense research. Also, I see you've been working hard on Human digestive system, and it's looking great. One things is that when you cite something, you need to note what part of the book you used, and the date of access of a website. That way if another editor wanted to check (theoretically), they wouldn't have to look through a whole book. To make citing easier, you can use the "Cite" button visible on the editor. For journal articles and books, it'll automatically fill out the information. --LT910001 (talk) 04:41, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy quarterly newsletter[edit]

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#2)

Previous -- Next
Released: First quarter, 2014
Updated cleanup listing and recent changes list in third quarter, 2014
Editor: LT910001

Hello WP:ANATOMY participant! This is the second quarterly update of goings-on in WP:ANATOMY, documenting the current state of WP:ANATOMY, current projects and items of interest, and any relevant news. I'd greatly value feedback on this, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new
What's going on
How can I contribute?
  • Reword anatomical jargon: jargon is widespread and not helpful to lay readers.
  • Contribute on our talk page
  • Continue to add sources, content, and improve anatomical articles!
  • Replace images with better images from Wikipedia commons, or if there are too many images, remove some low-quality ones
Quarterly focus - Where to edit?
One of our two new featured images! (Also featured on the Signpost)

On any given week we have at least 4-10 editors making significant contributions to our articles, with probably more than double this making minor edits. As an editor, I am often wondering: with so many articles, where to start? There is so much to be done (as always, on Wikipedia!), and I aim here to provide a comprehensive list of venues within our project. If I've missed any, please let us know on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page.

An editor might edit:

  • By importance. A user can use our assessment table to view articles by their importance and class. The vital articles project provides a list of designated 'Vital articles' for Wikipedia.
  • By popularity. One way to edit is to edit the most popular pages -- the majority of these need help, and editing is sure to bring benefit to many users.
  • By need. There is always cleanup that needs to be done, whether commenting on mergers, adding infoboxes or adding images. A cleanup list of all tagged articles is now available here: [2]
  • By interest. A series of inter-project categories has been developed to help facilitate inter-Wiki and inter-professional collaboration. These categories sort our articles into organs, system, gross anatomy, neuroanatomy, and several other categories. This should offer a buffet of articles for any interested editors! See here for more details.
  • By topic. Wikipedia's anatomical categories may provide impetus, as may editing a suite of related-articles, using a parent article such as ear for direction. A collection of series are slowly being rolled-out, including one for epithelia and for articles about the gastrointestinal wall, which also act as groups of topics. Templates, as documented on our main page, provide a similar categorisation.
  • By demand. Discussions relating to Anatomy are frequent occurrences on the talk pages for WPMED and WP:ANATOMY. Such topics almost always cry out for more editing.
  • By recent changes. One way to choose a destination for editing is to check the recent changes, revert vandalism, integrate/source edits, or generally collaborate in improving articles that are receiving contributions from other editors. This can be found in the here.
  • By chance. A user is always welcome to improve articles that they randomly 'bump into' by Wiki-surfing or by having bumped for other reasons into a particular article or topic that needs improvement

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by User:Mdann52, using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Mergers[edit]

Thanks a lot for helping with the mergers! I personally feel there are many benefits to mergers where consensus exists, so thanks for pushing some of these along, and doing it so thoroughly! When you're performing the merge on the page, remember to replace all the text on the merged page with the redirect and an {{R from merge}} tag (see WP:MERGE), that way we won't have future editors accidentally editing the merged pages. --LT910001 (talk) 00:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello again Iztwoz! Thank you for systematically working through the list of mergers. I reverted your merge of Nasopharynx. I try and work cooperatively with other editors, so if someone objects to a merge I will either leave it for consensus (there is no rush), or if that doesn't appear forthcoming after a few months, remove the merge tags with no consensus. Unfortunately, I don't think it's fair on the WP Community to go about performing mergers when, excluding the proposer, the commenters are split on the merge. At any rate, there is so much that needs doing that a merge not performed can be quickly forgotten, even if it is something I personally think would benefit the encyclopedia =P. I hope you are well, --LT910001 (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Operculum[edit]

Thanks for that. I've read authors using "operculum" for the whole bit of cortex covering the insula, and "parietal operculum", "frontal operculum", etc. for the different bits, and I tried to retain it ... but it's clumsy expression, and I'm quite happy to leave it out. Thanks for all your efforts in anatomy here. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 17:33, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

And that. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 19:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myotome (anatomy)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Myotome (anatomy) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This seems to be a dictionary definition only. Is there anything more to say about the subject? If not, it has no place in an encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 23:34, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello PamD the page was made simply to disambiguate from myotome (embryology) it might be able to be redirected somewhere instead - I shall have a look. Iztwoz (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
I see that another member of the Anatomy Wikiproject has merged the two topics. I'll leave it to you lot now - but please remember not to make page moves without following implications such as incoming links. PamD 07:15, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Myotome (disambiguation) links to two pages that redirect to the same page, Myotome. Unless these two pages are made different, the disambiguation page should be deleted. —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject![edit]

Physiology gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

  • Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
  • Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
  • Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
  • To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! DiptanshuTalk 12:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pancreas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors![edit]

please help translate this message into the local language
Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg The Cure Award
In 2013 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you so much for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date medical information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do!

We are wondering about the educational background of our top medical editors. Would you please complete a quick 5-question survey? (please only fill this out if you received the award)

Thanks again :) --Ocaasi, Doc James and the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation

Etymology[edit]

Hi Iztwoz. this edit was contrary to policy. Wikipedia articles are about things, not generally about words. The proper subject of the Embolism article is embolisms themselves, not the word embolism. A properly written Wikipedia article does not begin with a lead sentence of the form "In x, y refers to...", but rather a sentence of the form "In x, a y is...". The etymology of the article title is not relevant to the topic of the article. In most cases, etymology should not be included at all. Where it is appropriate, it rarely belongs in the lead section, and never belongs in the lead sentence. The lead sentence of an article is crucial: it must clearly state and/or explain the topic of the article. Introducing irrelevant material like the etymology of the article title breaks up this crucial sentence and distracts from the information that is actually important.

This is a common mistake, because people are used to dictionaries, which put the etymology first, before the definition of the word. This style is not appropriate for Wikipedia, and is contrary to the policy.--Srleffler (talk) 01:19, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi Srleffler Firstly I didn't write the article - I was just replacing something that you had removed. I agreed with your removal of the inclusion of the plural. However, I think you are mistaken in your interpretation of policy. WP is not a dictionary means that a page created needs to be more than just a definition which a lot of entries are. You tell me that the style is not appropriate for Wikipedia - then why is this same format been accepted for nine out of ten articles I've had a quick look at including featured articles - Hippocampus and Cerebellum see also, homeostasis, tetrapod, amphibian, cortex, cenozoic, thoracic diaphragm.............Iztwoz (talk) 13:18, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Take a look at the first row in the table at Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Major differences. It is explicit about what is and is not the proper focus of a Wikipedia article. Further down in the policy there is a discussion on the form of the first sentence, regarding "refers to" vs. "is". As I mentioned, this is a common error. You can find many articles with this problem, waiting to be fixed.--Srleffler (talk) 05:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Srleffler Personally I appreciate the translation of the word where appropriate; it would seem from the number of entries that incorporate this including featured articles - that it is also appreciated by the majority. I would point you to WP:Basic copyediting - Etiquette section which suggests that if you want to dispute an edit you take it to the talk page for open discussion. As regards the change from refers to, to is, I agree totally, I never made anything of this. Thank you Iztwoz (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyediting[edit]

The Coal India and the Bombay Stock Exchange articles require extensive copy-editing,I feel. Guru-45 (talk) 04:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paralimbic cortex may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Definition: 'Juxtallocortex'. http://www.medilexicon.com/medicaldictionary.php?t=46602</ref>)The paralimbic cortex provides a gradual transition from primary limbic regions, including the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

References for Scoliosis edit[edit]

Hi Iztwoz. I noticed your recent edit to Scoliosis, but didn't see that you added a reference to support the material. Is it supported by an existing citation in the article, are do you have a reference that you could add? —Waldhorn (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Iztwoz. You have new messages at Waldhorn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your GA nomination of Caenorhabditis elegans[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Caenorhabditis elegans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narayanese -- Narayanese (talk) 06:00, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Caenorhabditis elegans[edit]

The article Caenorhabditis elegans you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Caenorhabditis elegans for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Narayanese -- Narayanese (talk) 19:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

BMJ[edit]

Please fill out this very short form to receive your free access to BMJ's library: link to form. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:37, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks Nikkimaria, Iztwoz (talk) 07:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Writers Barnstar Hires.png The Writer's Barnstar
For your massive amount of high-quality work on anatomy articles! I don't even have time to keep up reading your content! -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 07:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Human vertebral column
added a link pointing to Anulus fibrosus
Vertebra (anatomy)
added a link pointing to Anulus fibrosus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Heart valve
added a link pointing to Truncus arteriosus
Respiratory tract
added a link pointing to Mainstem bronchus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Sebaceous gland[edit]

I've never done a GA review before. I tried to do the right thing, and get someone to help, but that isn't going as quickly as I had hoped. I am aware of the general criteria, and haven't formally applied those yet - I decided to review the prose and anything else that jumped out at me. I will address the other issues soon, but I wanted to get started. I want to check refs, and have a request in for JStor access, not sure how long that will take.--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sebaceous gland[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sebaceous gland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sphilbrick -- Sphilbrick (talk) 18:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I see that you've begun addressing some of my observations and comments. Please be aware that this is my first GA review, so I am still learning how to do it. I know I need to go through the formal list, but wanted to do so after seeing how you responded to my initial comments. That went well, if the green checks are any indication.
I need to address two other meta-issues:
  1. I've applied for JStor access, but that process appears to be glacial. My plan was to look at each of the sources to confirm that they support the text. I can do some, but some are not available to me. I guess I can check with someone who has JStor access, but I assume you have access to all the articles. I'm not thinking I will identify some I would like to look at, and ask you or find someone with access.
  2. I requested a mentor ten days ago, and so far, crickets. I'd really like to have someone more experienced make sure I am doing this correctly. Asking the correct way failed, I'll try plan B, as soon as I figure out Plan B.
I have a vague recollection that the structure of Sebaceous gland was similar to another article, which is a GA. If you know which one, I could track down who did the GA review, and they may be willing to check my work.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
I thought this article which you included as reference was fascinating. There were some things in that source that I thought would be a good addition to the article. I am mentioning them here, rather than the GA review because I think they are nice to have as opposed to required for GA.
The notion that a sweat drop which falls off the body is a waste is something that makes sense when you read it, but had never occurred to me. The function of sebum in reducing the loss of sweat drops is quite interesting in general, and as an evolutionary factor. That sebum can simultaneously help when it is hot (keeping sweat drops form falling off) and cold (to repel rain) is also quite an accomplishment.
Again, feel free to add it if you choose, but do not feel that it is a requirement for GA.
I'm almost done the GA review. I'm asking one other experienced editor to take a look.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:26, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sebaceous gland[edit]

The article Sebaceous gland you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Sebaceous gland for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. S Philbrick(Talk) 20:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

The instructions say a bot will come by to add the GA icon. I will probably check myself, but let me know if it doesn't show up soon.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:44, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations on getting this to GA, Iztwoz, it was great to work with you on it! --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypoxia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For all your work on anatomy-related articles. Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:18, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Not My Life[edit]

Hi Iztwoz,

Thank you again for your copyediting help and FAC comments in the past. I have nominated another article for featured status: Not My Life. It is about another human trafficking documentary film. If you have time to contribute to the discussion, any constructive comments would be greatly appreciated.

Neelix (talk) 03:19, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Iztwoz,
Thank you for your comments at the Not My Life FAC. Rhodes and I have had an extensive exchange there, and the article now appears to be to her satisfaction. Do you feel that there are any remaining issues that need addressing?
Neelix (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Intermediolateral nucleus
added a link pointing to Sacral
Trachea
added a link pointing to Inflammatory

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Doubloon.jpg The Golden Doubloon of Anatomy
You have been awarded the prestigious Golden Doubloon for your contributions to anatomy articles on Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions!

For the large amount of work on many anatomy articles, I hereby present you with the golden doubloon of anatomy, an award bestowed on only a few! (so far 2, I think) --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Crista terminalis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • on the interior of the atrium in the form of a vertical crest, known as the crista terminals (in older texts the ''crista terminals of His'' ([[Wilhelm His, Jr.]]). The crista terminalis is

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Crista terminalis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • on the interior of the atrium in the form of a vertical crest, known as the crista terminalis (in older texts the ''crista terminalis of '''[[Wilhelm His, Jr.|His]]''. The crista terminalis is

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lateral funiculus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posterolateral sulcus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pharyngeal groove
added links pointing to Pharyngeal pouch and Pharyngeal pouches
Rib cage
added a link pointing to Sacral

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Autonomic nervous system[edit]

Have a look... I think enough said... --Tom (LT) (talk) 04:26, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter[edit]

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#3)

Previous
Released: 1 November, 2014
Editor: Tom (LT)

Hello WP:Anatomy participant! This is the third quarterly update, documenting what's going on in WikiProkect Anatomy, news, current projects and other items of interest. I'd greatly value feedback on this, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new
What's going on
  • We fly past 10,000 articles (now already up to 10,150). Why is this important? Articles under our scope are automatically included in popular pages, the cleanup list, and will be included as the recent changes list is updated.
  • A discussion about the formatting of infoboxes.
  • A lot of editing on the heart article -- can it make it to GA?
  • The medical newsletter, WP:PULSE finds its feet, and Anatomy and Physiology are featured as a subsection!
  • A new WP:WikiProject Animal anatomy (WP:ANAN) is created to focus on animal anatomy.
How can I contribute?
  • Welcome new editors! We have a constant stream of new editors who are often eager to work on certain articles.
  • We are always looking to collaborate! If you're looking for editors to collaborate with, let us know on our talk page!
  • Continue to add high-class reliable sources
  • Browse images on WikiCommons to improve the quality of images we use on many articles.
Quarterly focus - Anatomical terminology

Anatomical terminology is an essential component to all our articles. It is necessary to describe structures accurately and without ambiguity. It can also be extremely confusing and, let's face it, it's likely you too were confused too before you knew what was going on ("It's all Greek to me!" you may have said, fairly accurately).

In the opinion of this editor, it's very important that we try hard to describe anatomy in a way that is both technically accurate and accessible. The majority of our readers are lay readers and will not be fluent in terminology. Anatomy is a thoroughly interesting discipline, but it shouldn't be 'locked away' only to those who are fluent in the lingo – exploring anatomy should not be limited by education, technical-level English fluency, or unfamiliarity with its jargon. Anatomical terminology is one barrier to anatomical literacy.

Here are four ways that we can help improve the readability of our anatomical articles.

  1. Substitute. Use words readers are familiar with -- there is no need to use anatomical terminology unless necessary!
    Innervated by
    The nerve that supplies X is...
  2. Explain. When using terminology, remember readers will likely not understand what you mean, so consider adding an explanation and providing context. Use wikilinks for terms that a reader may not know.
    "The triceps extends the arm" may not be readily understood. A small addition may help the reader:
    "The triceps extends the arm, straightening it". Consider:
  3. Separate. Do not use long, complicated sentences. Don't write discursive, long comparisons unless needed. Start with simple information first, then get progressively more complex. Separate information by paragraph and subsection. Bite-sized information is much more easier to digest for readers who don't have a solid anatomical foundation
  4. Eliminate. Not all information is necessary on every article. Hatnotes are a simple and effective way to direct readers to another article. Don't provide long lists of synonyms of names for structures that an article isn't about. If a sentence has been paraphrased to the hilt, consider that several editors are indicating it may need to be simplified.
    "The other branches of the trigeminal nerve are the opthalmic nerve (nervus opthalmicus) and mandibular nerve (nervus mandibularis)"
    "The other branches of the trigeminal nerve are the opthalmic nerve and mandibular nerve" is much more easily digestible

This essay is provided in full on WP:ANATSIMPLIFY.

This has been transcluded to the talk pages of all active WP:ANATOMY users. To opt-out, leave a message on the talkpage of Tom (LT) or remove your name from the mailing list

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Posterior inferior cerebellar artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wallenberg. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Gallbladder (disambiguation)[edit]

Are you sure you meant to do this? There are three items, not two, so "both" is grammatically incorrect, and a hat note is unfeasible. Bearian (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bearian - they all refer to the same entity and all have their own page. Gallbladder polyp is a separate page to gallbladder -one example... knee has a page and knee replacement has a page they do not share a disambiguation page. This just leaves Gallbladder (Chinese medicine) which seems more rational to me to have as a hat note link on gallbladder page - if that is not the done thing to be done then gallbladder polyp needs to be removed from disambig page. Another example is Mouth which has a hat note to Human mouth not a disambiguation page. If the removal is not wanted - then it's not wanted. Iztwoz (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
O.K., then. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Superficial anatomy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • **[[Human mouth]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Template box[edit]

Hello Iztwoz, I hope that you're well. Thanks for running over Bone, it's always nice to have someone to collaborate with. I created this template so that on a few articles, the 'bone' navboxes can be easily managed. You may find it useful (for perusing purposes as well). I've also made a proposal on WT:ANAT about getting rid of the 'GA' numbers which I find distracting and unhelpful. The template box ({{Human bones}}) contains, I think, our human bone templates and is useful as a single box for comparative and standardisation purposes. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Superficial anatomy
added links pointing to Mamma, Deltoid, Popliteal, Peroneal and Antecubital

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Refs[edit]

For major topics we just use secondary sources. This [4] is a primary source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:28, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Not to pile on, but just for future edits for the sepsis article, the remainder of the article is written in American style English and should be consistent throughout per WP:ARTCON, but this is a fairly minor point. TylerDurden8823 (talk) 22:16, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Cerebellum[edit]

I have nominated Cerebellum for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKiernan (talk) 13:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 24 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Human embryogenesis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atrium (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 23 January 2015 (UTC)