User talk:Karma1998

All user talks from 7 July 2017 to 16 August 2021 have been archived at User talk:Karma1998/Archive 1.

Persecution of Christians

Please come to the talk page and put in your opinion in the discussion of adding James the just to the article. Thank you! Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:00, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

ANI on Persecution of Christians

here: [1] Jenhawk777 (talk) 15:17, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The best Bible fact book

Hey, as you seem to have sound knowledge of the matter, you may like to have a look at this inquiry of mine. Feel free to comment there, if you like. Best wishes--Hildeoc (talk) 11:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for taking the time and trouble for your thorough comment.--Hildeoc (talk) 21:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

No problem @Hildeoc: :-) --Karma1998 (talk) 21:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please include edit summaries with your edits. Thanks. Editor2020 (talk) 03:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

I can only repeat Editor2020's request. You made seven recent edits to Modernism in the Catholic Church. You provided an edit summary for none of them. Please always provide an edit summary-- Jmc (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

You've once again edited Modernism in the Catholic Church without providing an edit summary. Please follow Wikipedia editing standards and always provide an edit summary. -- Jmc (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Once more, you've edited Modernism in the Catholic Church without providing an edit summary. PLEASE follow Wikipedia editing standards and always provide an edit summary. -- Jmc (talk) 01:01, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for providing edit summaries of your latest edits to Modernism in the Catholic Church. -- Jmc (talk) 08:19, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Goodmorning @Jmc:. I apologize for not answering you before. I have read your notifications and I will provide edit summaries to all my edits from here on.--Karma1998 (talk) 09:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your positive response - much appreciated. And thanks for your recent editing of Modernism in the Catholic Church. It's a subject I've been interested in ever since, as a theological student, encountering Alfred Loisy. -- Jmc (talk) 18:44, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome back

For a second I thought you quit Wikipedia.CycoMa (talk) 23:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

@Karma1998: I had actually considered quitting, but eventually I came back; after all, it was also thanks to my edits here that I got interested in theology, philosophy, history etc. Do you like my new User page?--Karma1998 (talk) 23:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

@Karma1998: Your new userpage looks great.CycoMa1 (talk) 23:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Oh yeah I am throwing this out there to make it obvious but I changed my username a bit. This is the same CycoMa you interacted with on those United monarchy articles.CycoMa1 (talk) 00:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Don't worry, I realized that; I hadn't even noticed the change, to be honest.-Karma1998 (talk) 00:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacques-Marie Vosté (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacques-Marie Vosté and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jacques-Marie Vosté, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Karma1998! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:25, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Your edit to Palmarian Catholic Church has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:24, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Copyright violation at Why Liberalism Failed

Your edit to Why Liberalism Failed has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 00:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

CDU leadership

Hello! Could you please undo parts of your latest edits to the CDU article to reflect that Mr Merz is not yet incumbent CDU leader and also was not yet officially elected? See also User talk:BastianMAT#CDU leadership status. I know that a lot of international media outlets have spread misinformation about this topic, but still we should reflect the actual status. I do not really want to continue fighting an edit war over such a factual question that is easily verifiable. Thank you for understanding. --Vogone (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Karma1998. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 15:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@RoySmith:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karma1998 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My main user (Karma 1998) has never been blocked by the English Wikipedia, nor has ever indulged in illicit activities. Therefore, I don't see why another of my accounts should be blocked for suckpuppeting, nor my own account. I simply have more than one account, it is not against the rules.

Decline reason:

I don't see where you declared your other accounts, prior to editing. I want to be clear, you may have declared this and I just missed it. Additionally, I see you used all three accounts to edit the same articles. This does not appear to be a valid exception under WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 10:20, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Karma1998 You talk about "another of my accounts". How many accounts do you have? -- RoySmith (talk) 17:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@RoySmith: my main account is Karma1998. I have other two (@Climacus2506: and @Rampart5555:, the latter now blocked); I rarely use them.-Karma1998 (talk) 17:52, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for your efforts

		The Current Events Barnstar
		Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @Cdjp1:, I'll proudly show it in my page :-) -Karma1998 (talk) 00:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ukraine genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Language policy in Ukraine

Ciao, non so sei ti ricordi di me: ci siamo brevemente e "problematicamente" incrociati su it.wiki, prima di venire defenestrati. Mi fa piacere ritrovarti qui e vedere che sei così attivo. Ho visto questo tuo edit e volevo scriverti per capire perché avessi rimosso quel testo; poi ho dato un'occhiata alla fonte e mi sono accorto che in effetti il resoconto era impreciso e quindi ho scritto questa sezione. Ti interessa in particolare la politica ucraina? Gitz (talk) (contribs) 01:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Ah ma ti trovo anche qui! Quella è una voce su cui sto lavorando molto - ottimo. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 01:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Ymblanter (talk) 18:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine to Fascist (insult). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Mhorg (talk) 00:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Revolutionary Mexicanist Action, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Calm down

You are being disruptive as you already know by now with your pointy edits on these separatist battalion articles.

You certainly have no idea about what is WP:RS since you use unreliable sources as clear from your history.

This comes after you were reported recently on ANI,[2] where you promised to tone down your rhetoric but you are still assuming bad faith in order to retain your edits.

Now if I ask you which of your source exactly describe the "ideology" or "controversy" in question, I am sure you will go mum even though you are using these terms to create new sections.

Stop making the edits you can't defend. Segaton (talk) 11:13, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Segaton: could you explain to me what are my "disruptive" behaviours? I have just added sourced material.--Karma1998 (talk) 11:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Why you are using this source when it makes no mention of Somalia Battalion? I see it mentions Paul Gubarev, but how that is relevant here? This is how you are violating WP:SYNTH. Segaton (talk) 11:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Segaton: I use it because I also wrote that Gubarev is a neo-nazi, so I sourced such statement.--Karma1998 (talk) 11:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

No need to drag him unnecessarily unless the source is actually talking about Somalia Battalion. See WP:OR and WP:SYNTH.

Can you also verify the statement "was hailed as a "true fascist" by separatist leader Pavel Gubarev", because Republica does not say that. Segaton (talk) 11:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

@Segaton: I remember reading that statement in the article. I'll check it again, hoping that paywall does not cut me off.--Karma1998 (talk) 11:48, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Moved the above discussion (relevant for talk page) to talk page at Talk:Somalia Battalion. Segaton (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Corriere della Sera

added a link pointing to Fascist Italy

Il Messaggero

added a link pointing to Fascist Italy

La Stampa

added a link pointing to Fascist Italy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erich Priebke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libero.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Novye Izvestia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

lgbt

hi, i couldn't stand this concern. i read your bio about 6 months ago, i watched some of your debates and i saw how intelligent you are (more than me for sure), i couldn't help but wonder how someone can be catholic and lgtb at the same time, yes i understand you are christian... but specifically catholic? no. how is your logic? if catholic teaching, dare I say, states otherwise, is it because it's not dogma? you only believe in catholic dogmas? (in that case), thanks in advance. Tuxzos22 (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

I only speak Spanish, I apologise if it is not well understood. Tuxzos22 (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Good evening @Tuxzos22:. Thank you for the question: while indeed the Catechism of the Catholic Church condemns homosexuality, there are also more liberal and inclusive positions among the clergy and the faithful.--Karma1998 (talk) 18:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Havana Times, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spanish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Anglican Free Communion International moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anglican Free Communion International, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 09:06, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anglican Free Communion International (September 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anglican Free Communion International and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 19:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your old edit at Celsus

Hello! A little over one year ago, you made this edit at Celsus. This edit introduced six sources which do not have full citations, just a last name and a date. Do you know what those sources are and whether they can be expanded? It would improve the article a lot. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 23:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

@ThadeusOfNazereth: Hello! I will look at the issue ASAP.-Karma1998 (talk) 09:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Mary, mother of Jesus has an RFC

Mary, mother of Jesus has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. — That Coptic Guy (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Geert Stuyver

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Geert Stuyver requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geert Stuyver. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 11:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

La Verità (magazine)‎

Please carefully look what happened. Someone deleted a sourced statement so I reverted the edit but used the one that you are talking about. So be careful in your reverts. Egeymi (talk) 20:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Are you IP User: 2001:760:2e03:a21d:40a3:8bec:62fd:a6e9  ? Hope not. --Egeymi (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (4th request)

You recently copied text from The Purple Book (Labour Party) to Blue Labour. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 20:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

@DanCherek: I am extremely sorry for my violation, I forgot about the procedure. It won't happen again.-Karma1998 (talk) 20:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the acknowledgment and quick reply. No worries as long as you keep it in mind for the future. DanCherek (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shisuikai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pro-China.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karl Rodig

The article Karl Rodig has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I created this page several months ago. After further research, I come to the conclusion that there is no real reason for this man to have a page. He is simply an episcopus vagans, leader of a small group. There are many like him and I do not see what makes him different

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Popular Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RFI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Edit reverted

Hi Karma1998. I have recently reverted one of your recent edits to the article Qatar corruption scandal at the European Parliament. Due to your edit being in referenced or in contradiction to the references.

Please join the discussion if you believe the edit should not have been reverted and take the discussion to the article Talk page. To avoid an edit war, please do not make the same changes to the article again until consensus has been reached in the talk page.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia and happy editing! Jo Jc Jo^{Talk💬Edits📝} 22:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jo Jc Jo^{Talk💬Edits📝} 00:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Qatar corruption scandal at the European Parliament

On 14 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Qatar corruption scandal at the European Parliament, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Undone Edit

Hi, I've recently removed your contribution to the Qatar corruption scandal at the European Parliament as I believe it is original research. The inference of the contribution is that the delay in the passing of a motion is related to the scandal and its inclusion implies the passing of the resolution is linked to the breaking of the scandal. This isn't explicit in source. (Personally, I find it more likely that it did not pass because it was submitted by a GUE/NGL MEP who often don't get support for resolutions for other political reasons.)

If you believe this opinion to be incorrect or want to discuss further please reach out or, alternatively, take it to the article talk.

Thanks and happy editing! Jo Jc Jo^{Talk💬Edits📝} 15:23, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Stop adding unsourced material!

Please:

1. Stop adding unsourced material; see WP:V, and optionally WP:CHEWINGGUM
2. Stop adding material which is not present in the inline references, whether those inline references are already present or added by you. This is called WP:FICTREF.

Thanks in advance. Veverve (talk) 10:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

New World Encyclopedia

New World Encyclopedia is not a RS. Veverve (talk) 06:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't get it @Veverve:, so weird Moonie sources are no good but weird Catholic ones are. What gives, you Catholic? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:31, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

"selects and claims to rewrite certain Wikipedia articles through a focus on Unification values": so not a RS, but a rewritten WP:MIRROR. Veverve (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Clearly not a WP:RS, but how is that less obvious than Catholic Culture? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:38, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

@Veverve: I realized that the New World Encyclopedia was not reliable, so I hadded other sources. @Horse Eye's Back: yeah, I am Catholic, some problems with that?-Karma1998 (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anglican Free Communion International

Hello, Karma1998. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anglican Free Communion International, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Conservative Catholics (Italy)

Hello Karma1998. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Conservative Catholics (Italy), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: If the hoax is even remotely plausible, it isn't eligible for speedy deletion. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:27, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Václav Klaus Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civic Democratic Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Shadow4dark. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hamas, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 03:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2011–2013 Russian protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Other Russia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Abecedare (talk) 21:37, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive editing and slow edit-war at British Raj

Your repeated insertion of the flags/emblems to the infobox at British Raj ([3], [4], [5], [6]) despite the various prior discussions on the topic including the one you started, is disruptive. Continuing in this vein will likely get you sanctioned. Abecedare (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

And not a good idea to log out to make a similar edit as you apparently did using 95.131.44.111 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). See wikipedia's policies on sockpuppetry. Abecedare (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Once again you’ve inserted your preferred version, and once again it has been undone. You are at serious risk of losing your editing privileges if you do this again. Mathglot (talk)

@Mathglot: very well, I won't edit that page again. Don't want to get into trouble.-Karma1998 (talk) 16:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugenio Ravignani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pola.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

My revert

Sorry about that. Errant mouse click. Thanks for catching it and reverting back. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome. Karma1998 (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fawn Hall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Find a grave

I message you due to this. Find a grave is not a RS; see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Veverve (talk) 06:36, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ecclesiam Suam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 18:38, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Karma1998! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Ecclesiam Suam several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Ecclesiam Suam, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 18:39, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 06:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Brant J. Pitre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brant J. Pitre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brant J. Pitre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

tgeorgescu (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

copying text

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2014 into Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Mikeblas (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Veverve (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Atilano Coco Martín

Hello, Karma1998. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atilano Coco Martín, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Death and state funeral of Silvio Berlusconi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Il Giorno.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Domani (newspaper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabloid.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Veverve (talk) 10:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Veverve (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the 2012 (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! NM 03:09, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Viva Villa!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Old Catholic Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page La Croix.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

You often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary. your preferences. NM 00:34, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Veverve (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Do not add blogs please

Please do not add WP:BLOGs like catechism.cc like you did at Cum ex apostolatus officio. Veverve (talk) 09:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lotus case, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Max Huber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marie Carré, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Remnant.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Anarchism

Hi Karma1998,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

We also have a stub (short article) expansion drive, if you'd like to participate.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 13:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Czar:. Actually I'm not an expert on anarchism, I just happened to read Mussolini il rivoluzionario of Renzo De Felice, which mentioned the story of the Unione Sindacale Italiana and the Italian Labour Union (1918–1925).--Karma1998 (talk) 19:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC)