User talk:SpeedReader/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 5

Talkback

Hello, SpeedReader. You have new messages at Hadger's talk page.
Message added 03:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hadger 03:13, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SpeedReader. You have new messages at WT:AFC.
Message added 21:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Delivered 00:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Talkback

Hello, SpeedReader. You have new messages at Steven Zhang's talk page.
Message added 23:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Steven Zhang Help resolve disputes! 23:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Thank you! Jakob 16:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

06:05, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Jakob 16:21, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

11:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Jakob 16:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

--Astros4477 (talk) 18:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! The only problem is, I've used up all my ornaments on the other trees! Jakob 15:52, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low Designer's World   Readership: High Quality: Low Glo Worm
Readership: High Quality: Low Montreal Convention   Readership: High Quality: High Bop It
Readership: High Quality: Low Stickle bricks   Readership: High Quality: Medium Murder on the Orient Express
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Great Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition: Science Slightly over the Edge   Merge
Readership: High Quality: Low Environmental Modification Convention   Readership: High Quality: Low Kenner Products
Readership: High Quality: Low FurReal Friends   Readership: High Quality: Medium Militarisation of space
Readership: High Quality: Low Buckaroo (game)   Readership: High Quality: Low Server room
Readership: High Quality: Low Mystery Mansion (board game)   Add sources
Readership: High Quality: Low Sit 'n Spin   Readership: High Quality: Low Cluedo SFX
Readership: High Quality: Low Hi Ho! Cherry-O   Readership: High Quality: Low Cluedo Mysteries
Readership: High Quality: Low Girl Talk (board game)   Readership: High Quality: Low Call of Duty 3
Readership: High Quality: Low Wolverine and the X-Men (toyline)   Wikify
Readership: High Quality: Low Highlands (song)   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Las ataduras
Readership: High Quality: Low Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance   Readership: High Quality: Low Toy Industry Association
Readership: High Quality: Low Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention   Readership: Low Quality: Low St. Gregory Barbarigo School
Readership: High Quality: Low Gator Golf   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture   Readership: High Quality: Low Connect Four
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Agreement for the mutual safeguarding of secrecy of inventions relating to defence and for which applications for patents have been made   Readership: High Quality: Low Biological Weapons Convention
Readership: High Quality: Low Registration Convention   Readership: High Quality: Low Curious George 2: Follow That Monkey!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Hey SpeedReader! Wishing you a very happy New Year :) CURTAINTOAD! TALK! 09:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, SpeedReader. You have new messages at The Anonymouse's talk page.
Message added 17:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just in case... The Anonymouse (talk • contribs) 17:41, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


The Signpost: 31 December 2012

Afc/Mike Glowacki

The article was created because musician has release an album and Wikipedia is a great source to find out more information. I have added the list of songs with references to the Copyright Encyclopedia for verification. Please re-review the article. Thanks and Happy New Year! Here is the link to the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mike_Glowacki AnnamarieAnnamarie Blaha (talk) 16:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

AFCBuddy

78.26

Thanks for creating this script! A couple of questions. First, shouldn't anyone appearing in the "Running Total" list below the leaderboard automatically be included? Also, the script seems to have a bug. I haven't counted anyone else's, but I've reviewed 31 articles, not 21. The script changed the number on the leaderboard. All the best, 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 22:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Darn it, i didn't expect people to find my tampering with the scoring in my favor so quickly! ;). It seems i forgot to tell the script that capital letters don't matter (AFCH != afch unless you explicitly state it is.). The reviews it missed are now correctly being counted.
On the other hand, it is now assuming you have 40 reviews since it counts both the actual article and the redirect page that was created by moving the page. I'll iron that issue out in a bit. Hopefully the script will be quite stable in a couple of days. Oh, and thanks for mentioning the issue - much appreciated! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 23:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

SpeedReader

Yes, Why am I not on the leader board? at the time that the script ran, I had 40 reviews. Thanks, Jakob 23:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC) P.S. Thanks for relieving me with the script! Before, I was the one who had to manually update the leaderboard

It seems that you aren't using the AFC helper script to review pages. AFCBuddy detects pages by the default summary's it places when accepting or moving a page. There are a few possible solutions i can think off:
  • If you could review pages using the AFC helper script it would detect edits as normal (Any reason why you are not using it?). Since updating the review list is manual copy-n-paste work i could leave any old reviews there. Equally i could adjust the review count of your username in the tool, so that it would offset the reviews it cannot detect itself.
  • If you cannot or don't want to use the AFC Helper script for reviewing i can simply use your review list as a basis for the scoreboard (A simple count of the diffs on that page). A side effect would be that you would need to keep updating that page manually, since AFCBuddy wouldn't be able to detect any reviews from you :/ Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 23:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Alright, since I cannot use the AFC Helper Script, see this, and this for more on that, I'll add myself manually. Thanks! --Jakob 23:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Quite unfortunate you can't use it - it is quite a handy script for reviewing. To at least reduce your workload a little bit i added a little tweak to AFCHelper. When it tries to check your accounts edits it will use an alternative procedure that counts the amount of reviews listed at January 2013 Backlog Elimination Drive/SpeedReader. The result of count that (Currently 56 links, just as listed) will be used when generating the scoreboard. It won't prevent you from having to keep that page up to date manually, but at the very least you shouldn't have to worry about keeping the scoreboard up to date anymore Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 01:02, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

AFC Script

Just wondering...When a user manually puts an article under review, can the AFC Helper Script overwrite that? This is what seems to have happened here; I put the article under review (manually, of course) looked over it. Finding that it was not written in English, I went to decline it, but found that you already had. Please don't get me wrong, I don't really care that I didn't get the point; just wondering. --Jakob 20:42, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it can indeed do that. As long as a page has an open AFC template (With "Open" being "Not declined or accepted") it will simply override any "In review" templates and place the decline template. If a review is no longer open when someone tries to review a page, the script will report an error stating there are no open templates. Eg:
  • (User1 loads page) => (User2 marks as Reviewing) => (User1 declines page) => Page Declined
  • (User1 loads page) => (User2 declines page) => Page Declined => (User1 declines page, not having seen the new revision) => User1 receives an error.
The behavior is actually more or less as intended. If someone would mark the page as "Reviewing" they wouldn't be able to use the script to accept or decline a page afterwards if it wouldn't override in review templates. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 20:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Unfair

Dear, SpeedReader.

I find your action to deny my submission absolutely preposterous. Please, take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Hyoryeong . They have submitted the same way, and they were able to submit their article and I cannot? Who sets the justice in Wikipedia? I find this unfair. There is a scarce amount of English information to quote from about Grand Prince Royal Jinan. If you guys want to raise the bar, then you guys need to start translating the works of Korean documents yourselves. Please, accept my article as many more of Korean Princes’ articles have been successfully submitted this way.

Lee, Jyong Chul.
Founder and CEO
The Korean Monarchy and the Korean Royal Armed Forces Korea Reunification Party
(22nd in line House of Grand Prince Royal Jinan)

Just a note: i got the same question from this user and replied to him here. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:28, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, SpeedReader/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by JHUbal27 20:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

The RFC for TAFI is nearing it's conclusion, and it's time to hammer out the details over at the project's talk page. There are several details of the project that would do well with wider input and participation, such as the article nomination and selection process, the amount and type of articles displayed, the implementation on the main page and other things. I would like to invite you to comment there if you continue to be interested in TAFI's development. --NickPenguin(contribs) 02:35, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Tommy Seigler article

On January 1st, you declined an article about Tommy Seigler I had written because I mistakenly submitted it blank, but I immediately resubmitted it with revisions, cited sources, and photos. Can you please take a look at the page again for me and see if it is ready for approval? Thank you.

Brandon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandonseigler (talkcontribs) 01:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low De Brevitate Vitae (Seneca)   Readership: High Quality: Low Sorry! (game)
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Uetze   Readership: High Quality: High Psylocke
Readership: High Quality: Low Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer   Readership: High Quality: High Snake Eyes (G.I. Joe)
Readership: High Quality: Low Mustard (color)   Merge
Readership: Low Quality: Low Papua New Guinea–Solomon Islands Maritime Boundary Treaty   Readership: High Quality: Low List of My Little Pony characters
Readership: High Quality: Low Transformers Universe (video game)   Readership: High Quality: Low Demarcation point
Readership: High Quality: Low Guess Who?   Readership: High Quality: Low List of Curious George DVDs
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Wennigsen   Add sources
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Travel Go   Readership: High Quality: Low Outer Space Treaty
Readership: High Quality: Low Whot!   Readership: High Quality: Low CirKis
Readership: High Quality: Low Burgwedel   Readership: High Quality: Low Catch Phrase (game)
Readership: Low Quality: Low Cuba–Haiti Maritime Boundary Agreement   Wikify
Readership: Low Quality: Low Conventions concerning Wages, Hours of Work on Board Ship and Manning   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Stewart MacFarlane
Readership: High Quality: Low Isernhagen   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Hippodrome Theater (Cleveland, Ohio)
Readership: High Quality: Low Totopoly   Readership: Medium Quality: Low Julianne Schultz
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Cuba–Jamaica Maritime Boundary Agreement   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Sehnde   Readership: High Quality: High List of states with nuclear weapons
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Ronnenberg   Readership: High Quality: Medium List of Curious George episodes
Readership: High Quality: Low Hemmingen   Readership: High Quality: High International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Friendship Request..! :P

Hii There..I would really like to know you a bit more..I mean lets get to know each other..I am from India and i am new to wikipedia..It would be great help to hear from you..Snehild Thank You..! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snehild (talkcontribs) 13:17, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

The Signpost: 21 January 2013


A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor!
Hello SpeedReader. You have signed my guestbook! Thank you very much.--Pratyya (Hello!) 18:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low Readership: Low to High Readership: High, while for quality the scale goes from Low Quality: Low to High Quality: High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs   Cleanup
Readership: High Quality: Low Mustard (color)   Readership: High Quality: Low Sorry! (game)
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Wennigsen   Readership: High Quality: High Monopoly (game)
Readership: High Quality: Low Sehnde   Readership: High Quality: Low Pictionary
Readership: High Quality: Low Guess Who?   Merge
Readership: Low Quality: Low Papua New Guinea–Solomon Islands Maritime Boundary Treaty   Readership: High Quality: Low Demarcation point
Readership: High Quality: Low Zuleikha Robinson   Readership: High Quality: Low List of My Little Pony characters
Readership: High Quality: Low Whot!   Readership: High Quality: Low Economy of Trinidad and Tobago
Readership: High Quality: Low Ants in the Pants   Add sources
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Ronnenberg   Readership: High Quality: Low Outer Space Treaty
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Conventions concerning Wages, Hours of Work on Board Ship and Manning   Readership: High Quality: Low CirKis
Readership: High Quality: Low De Brevitate Vitae (Seneca)   Readership: High Quality: Low Catch Phrase (game)
Readership: High Quality: Low Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer   Wikify
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Hemmingen   Readership: High Quality: Low Lim Hyung Joo
Readership: High Quality: Low Burgwedel   Readership: High Quality: High Psylocke
Readership: High Quality: Low Laatzen   Readership: High Quality: Medium The Transformers (TV series)
Readership: Low Quality: Low Cuba–Jamaica Maritime Boundary Agreement   Expand
Readership: High Quality: Low Transformers Universe (video game)   Readership: High Quality: High Duel Masters
Readership: Low Quality: Low Cuba–Haiti Maritime Boundary Agreement   Readership: High Quality: High List of states with nuclear weapons
Readership: Medium Quality: Low Uetze   Readership: High Quality: High International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:10, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter

Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader (Irish Citizen Army Grapple X (submissions)) had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. Florida 12george1 (submissions) was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:

  • United States Ed! (submissions) was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
  • Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
  • Chicago HueSatLum (submissions) claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of British Empire The C of E (submissions), who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 00:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013