User talk:Wadewitz/Archive 50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dostoyevsky peer review[edit]

hello,

I invite you to join this peer review. Any help appreciated! Regards.--GoPTCN 12:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to look at it this weekend. Wadewitz (talk) 17:07, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hey Wadewitz, I also just moved to LA, I live just south of Eagle Rock, I could give you a ride to the Wiknic if you want. You can e-mail me cahenderson08@gmail

Thanks so much! Emailed. Wadewitz (talk) 16:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 June 2012[edit]

Hi![edit]

I've been watching you work on Dostoyevski and just wanted to stop by, say hi, and say that's good to see you active again. Hope all is well. LA is a big change, I'm sure. Truthkeeper (talk) 17:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's good to be editing again, yes! Do you know anything about LA? I could do with some advice! :) Wadewitz (talk) 23:45, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I do actually. Do you still have my email address? Truthkeeper (talk) 23:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't seem to find it - email me through Wikipedia so I have it again. Any info you could give me about LA would be great! Wadewitz (talk) 04:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have email here anymore but I might still have you in my contacts. Will have a look. We'll catch up somehow. Truthkeeper (talk) 10:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You can just "email this user" on the left-hand side of the user page. Wadewitz (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have both your email addresses - if you want me to send them to each of you, let me know. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 12:17, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Or that would work. :) Wadewitz (talk) 16:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Adrianne[edit]

Well, that was a nice conversation today.

Here is the website. And I just put it up yesterday, so we are testing it now and not everything works. For instance you have to click on the pictures twice, and so on and so forth. We will have all of the bugs addressed in a couple of days.

At least we have proven that we can place any Wikipedia article on a timeline, without human intervention. It only starts to get interesting from there, considering all you can do with it AFTER you get the article into the timeline.

I will spend next week recording instructional videos for the site. It seems like its capabilities are endless.

http://www.wikitimelines.net/

And if you need a ride anywhere, ping me.

Send me an email, so I can get you into my inbox.

Jroehl (talk) 01:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jeff Roehl jroehl2@yahoo.com (818) 912-7530

The Signpost: 25 June 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 02 July 2012[edit]

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania 2012[edit]

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania - You are invited!
Are you a woman attending Wikimania 2012? If so, join us on Saturday, July 14, for the annual WikiWomen's Luncheon (fka WikiChix Lunch) This event is for any women attending Wikimania. Pick up your lunch, compliments of Wikimania, and join us at 1:30pm in the Grand Ballroom for a lively facilitated discussion hosted by Sue Gardner. We look forward to seeing you there. Please sign up here.
Sarah (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Paul McCartney FAC[edit]

The Paul McCartney article has now been thoroughly copyedited top-to-bottom by numerous editors including User:Lfstevens, who is a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. If you can find the time in your busy schedule, please consider stopping by and taking a look, and hopefully, !voting. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 03:44, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time this week. If the FAC is still going on next week, I can take a look and would be happy to help. Wadewitz (talk) 17:05, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 July 2012[edit]

Please work your FA magic! bd2412 T 16:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will get to it later this week! Nice to meet you, btw! Wadewitz (talk) 20:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 July 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 23 July 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 30 July 2012[edit]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TomOfFinlandArtWorkSample.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TomOfFinlandArtWorkSample.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A plea[edit]

Adrianne, is there any possibility that you will one day return to content editing? The FAC milieu is increasingly unattractive, and I am unsure how much longer I can be bothered with it. The lack of literature articles is depressing, and needs to be addressed if the increasing pop culture emphasis is to be reversed. I realise that your professional life leaves you with less time than you were once able to give to writing and reviewing, but the prospect of even one article a year from your stable would make a young[ish] man happy. I would even help if I could. Brianboulton (talk) 13:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no! That is depressing to hear! I was actually thinking of getting back into editing a bit, particularly because I wanted to work on Jane Austen. I will make an effort to work on those articles in the coming weeks and see if I can make that happen! Wadewitz (talk) 21:37, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It will be great to have your contributions, even on a limited basis. I may venture to ask your advice from time to time. Brianboulton (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 August 2012[edit]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TomOfFinlandArtWorkSample.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TomOfFinlandArtWorkSample.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 August 2012[edit]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TomOfFinlandArtWorkSample.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:TomOfFinlandArtWorkSample.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 August 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 27 August 2012[edit]

Anyone watching my talk page who might be interested[edit]

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes America/Los Angeles - Join us! Wadewitz (talk) 23:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 September 2012[edit]

Main Page appearance[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article Timeline of Mary Wollstonecraft know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on September 10, 2012. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/September 10, 2012. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well done![edit]

Hi Adrianne, Great to see the Timeline of Mary Wollstonecraft. Terrific work! Whiteghost.ink (talk) 02:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Wadewitz (talk) 03:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 September 2012[edit]

Main page appearance: Mary Martha Sherwood[edit]

This is a note to let the main editors of Mary Martha Sherwood know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on September 22, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 22, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Mary Martha Sherwood

Mary Martha Sherwood (1775–1851) was a prolific and influential writer of children's literature in 19th-century Britain. She composed over 400 books, tracts, magazine articles, and chapbooks; among the most famous are The History of Little Henry and his Bearer and The History of the Fairchild Family. Sherwood is known primarily for the strong evangelicalism that colored her early writings; however, her later works are characterized by common Victorian themes, such as domesticity. Sherwood's childhood was uneventful, although she recalled it as the happiest part of her life. After she married Captain Henry Sherwood and moved to India, she converted to evangelical Christianity and began to write for children. The Sherwoods returned to England after a decade in India and, building upon her popularity, Sherwood opened a boarding school and published scores of texts for children and the poor. Many of Sherwood's books were bestsellers and she has been described as "one of the most significant authors of children's literature of the nineteenth century." (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 September 2012[edit]

Dostoyevsky[edit]

Hello,

I reformatted the style section of Fyodor Dostoyevsky and added some content. Could you take a look and tell me your feedback? Regards.--Kürbis () 17:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I won't have any free time for about two weeks. If it can wait that long, yes, I would be happy to! Wadewitz (talk) 22:35, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Calling all girl sleuths[edit]

I've just noticed that Nancy Drew has been scheduled for TFA for September 30. I know you're very busy as usual, but the page needs some TLC and wondered whether you could give it a bit of copyediting in any spare moments you might have in the next few days. I'll try to do the same, and might put out a call to a few other female lit types (if we have any left! but if we do, I'd bet they'd be watching your page). It would be fun to see a full copyedit push done by all women editors! I'll be very busy in the next week and gone (I think) when it runs, so there's a limited amount I can do, but hope you can pitch in - even if only for five minutes or so here and there. Children's lit is rare for the front page - and no girl sleuth ever as far as I know. Hope you're well, by the way. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Adding: so I don't have to post on a bunch of pages - this is for Wadewitz' talk page stalkers too. We all know how busy she is, but thought I'd take a chance. Hopefully someone will see this message and help me c/e the girl sleuth. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm one of the above-mentioned girl lit type and Adrianne-talk-page-stalker. I have some things pending as well here and in real life, but I'll see what I can do to help out. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:17, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Christine. I just caught this as I was logging out. In the least we should fix the MoS issues and I think people should just jump in. It's actually not too bad but could do with some reformatting as well. I haven't read all the way through yet - hope to get to it tomorrow. Truthkeeper (talk) 03:25, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll see what I can get to this week! Thanks for letting me know! Wadewitz (talk) 03:37, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ack! You're right! It needs help! Wadewitz (talk) 21:53, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

cog sci class[edit]

Hi! One of our students (Sparkletts514) got trolled. Is there a way to lock her page so that only logged in users can edit it? Clevwiki (talk) 18:41, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just checking to make sure you know that it wasn't the student just playing around and testing the software. If you know for sure, we can block the IP, but we don't usually lock userpages except in extreme cases, which this is not. Wadewitz (talk) 20:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It definitely wasn't the student playing around, and it looks like the IP was in the UK. Blocking the IP works if that is an option that isn't too tricky.Clevwiki (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok - I'll ask for a block. Wadewitz (talk) 05:51, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I can't ask for a block yet. The only page they edited was that particular userpage. That is very suspicious. It is very unlikely that someone would have found that userpage without being a part of the class or knowing someone in the class. Very mysterious. Let's keep an eye on it and see what happens. Wadewitz (talk) 05:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One more question -- is there an easy way to search the list of stubs/starts? I have found myself starting by looking for interesting topics and seeing if they are starts or stubs but that seems a bit backwards. Clevwiki (talk) 18:51, 24 September 2012 (UTC) (Sorry I have been forgetting to describe the edits!)[reply]

I linked to all of the "stub" and "start" lists for each WikiProject on the class page. Wadewitz (talk) 20:01, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Right but some of those lists are super long. Anyway we shall see what the students choose. In some cases, I might let them go off-list (e.g., one student presented on a topic today that has a logic start class article under medicine but not specific to any of the projects we already listed. Clevwiki (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they are long. But they are a way to narrow down from the six million! Wadewitz (talk) 05:51, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hey, thanks so much for the warm welcome - I love the cookies! K-BlueHerring (talk) 22:22, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm in the cogsci class, and part of our next assignment is to practice by introducing ourselves to you. Thanks for all your help this past week or so, I'm excited to know how this works now. :) With-silver-luck (talk) 22:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am introducing myself to you for my Cog Sci Research Methods class. Hello! Font6 (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! Thanks for all the help with Wikipedia! Requiredforclass (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Quick question... I tried posting a picture from my personal photo library, but I couldn't figure it out. I ended up doing some generic dog one, but I'm not sure where wiki pulled it from. How do I post a picture of mine or one I choose from the internet? Soggycereal4 (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go over this in class tomorrow if we get time after the presentations Clevwiki (talk) 06:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, here is a video tutorial on how to upload images. Let me know if you have any problems. Wadewitz (talk) 16:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,I'm introducing myself for my cog sci research methods class! Neurosci21 (talk) 08:52, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, me too. *{{Tchar (talk) 22:16, 27 September 2012 (UTC)}}[reply]

The Signpost: 24 September 2012[edit]

Help with peer review?[edit]

Hi Adrianne; I've returned to WP after an admittedly long hiatus (and don't quite know yet how much time I will spend here in the future), and I'm now all geared up to get my article Jürgen Ehlers (about a physicist who was my mentor and unexpectedly died in 2008) up to FA status. I've put the article up for peer review here, and your help would be greatly appreciated! Hope that all is well with you; it's a bit weird not addressing you as Awadewit... Markus Poessel (talk) 19:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it this weekend! Nice to see you again! Wadewitz (talk) 20:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Thanks in advance! Markus Poessel (talk) 20:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 01 October 2012[edit]

TFAR[edit]

I thought of Reception history of Jane Austen for TFA, please join the discussion and trim the blurb ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:56, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Wadewitz! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 18:00, 5 October 2012 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Hello, myself![edit]

Hello, I am introducing myself to myself. Weird. Queeralice (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 October 2012[edit]

You're invited! FemTech Edit-a-Thon at Claremont Graduate University[edit]

October 26 - FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable - You are invited!
Everyone is invited to the first FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable at Claremont Graduate University on October 26 from 3-6 pm. The event will open with a roundtable discussion about feminism and anti-racist technology projects, followed by an edit-a-thon focusing on feminists & women in science. Experienced Wikipedians will be on hand to support new editors. We hope you can join us!

Sign up here - see you there! 01:08, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and Communicate OER![edit]

Thank you for signing up on the Communicate OER team page! There's a great group forming -- so far, we have more than 25 people, with a broad range of backgrounds and interests; we have professors, librarians, instructional designers, and more. Members also span a variety of countries and language proficiencies. As we set out to improve articles about openness in education, it looks like we will have a great team to work with. If you haven't looked through the list, I encouraged you to read through it: WP:Communicate OER Team.

Whether or not you're at the Open Education conference this week, we encourage you to engage with us -- we're expecting a flurry of activity as we launch! If you're here, come visit us in room C010 any time; or come to one of our daily 45 minute intro sessions in the Remixathon track in room C215.

Another great way to stay engaged is through the project's "talk page" (aka "discussion page"): WT:COMMOER. Please always feel free to add ideas, questions, etc. at the bottom of that page -- even if you just want to say hi, and go into a little more detail about what you're hoping to work on -- we'd love to hear from you. (I just posted a note at the bottom, exploring the open education article, and seeking input into how we can go about improving it -- take a look!)

If you're just looking to get started, we have a page for that -- WP:Communicate OER Do -- intended to collect ideas of projects we can work on. There's currently a "getting started" recipe for how to post a review of a Wikipedia article; check back for further ideas in the coming days. (And if you're game, feel free to add your own!)

Looking forward to working together, -Pete (talk) 18:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks for your offer to help mentor newbies on CommOER. Sara and I are wrapping up at the Open Ed conference now -- hoping to loop back with you and find the best fit! -Pete (talk) 23:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 October 2012[edit]

The Expert Barnstar[edit]

The Expert Barnstar
I hereby award you the Expert Barnstar for your outstanding contributions to literature-related topics. This award is given to a few people who are regarded experts in one or several particular fields. Congrats and keep up your excellent work :)!--Tomcat (7) 13:14, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 October 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 05 November 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 12 November 2012[edit]

Need scripting help![edit]

Talk page stalkers, I need someone to help with a research project Sadads and I are working on - we need some scripting help. Anyone know someone who can help us? Wadewitz (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from the WeHo edit-a-thon![edit]

I drove in the rain for the first today! Queeralice (talk) 21:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OMG. LA drivers are scared by rain. Queeralice (talk) 21:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Copy editing assignment[edit]

Hello Awadewit, I am a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador of UNLV. In our course syllabus, we have used your DKY Copy Editing Assignment as a template for our own, and we are having trouble with the licensing. We would like to ask for your permission to use this assignment and any help you could give us for constructing the proper copyright tag to use for the correct copyright status. Thank you for your helpSaehee0908 (talk) 21:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! I'm so glad someone is using it! You don't need my permission, however. I released that assignment into the public domain, so you can alter it however you want and use it at will! Awadewit (talk) 00:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Awadewit! We have altered it and we posted it, but it kept saying that we had a licensing agreement problem and the assignment was deleted. What exactly were we supposed to do for the licensing agreement? Thank you! Saehee0908 (talk) 06:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Link? Wadewitz (talk) 14:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danger recommended you as an editor she respects, here. I was wondering if you would help in continuing to develop. Rape and pregnancy controversies in the 2012 United States elections. My goal is to get it to good article status.Casprings (talk) 03:58, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can review the article, but I don't have time to add content right now. Would that be helpful? Let me know. Wadewitz (talk) 17:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Very helpful. Also if you could offer comments for improvement, that would also be helpful.Casprings (talk) 00:42, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll do that, then! Wadewitz (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 November 2012[edit]

Request[edit]

Hi Wadewitz,

I have been working on Entertainment since it came up as "Today's article for improvement" on 13 October. It is listed as a "vital" article and I found myself enjoying the challenge of making such a big, universal topic into one concise, representative and coherent article (it was fairly random and limited before). Would you please have a look and let me know if you think it is ready for GA or FA and if not, what should I do to get it there? I would appreciate your opinion before I draw it to everyone's attention. I had to think it through as I went and that thinking is set out on the Talk Page.

Thanks! Whiteghost.ink (talk) 07:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! What a project! I'll take a look at it, yes! Wadewitz (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Yes, it turned into a project. It got me hooked when the WP:TAFI people nominated it and once I started, I became enmeshed. I have just asked the TAFI people to review it. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 07:08, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know, I am still working through the suggestions to make this article reach GA status but worried it will reach some sort of deadline and be failed just before I do. Nearly finished. Is it close yet? Whiteghost.ink (talk) 00:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 November 2012[edit]

Main Page appearance (2)[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of the article Timeline of Jane Austen know that it will be appearing as the main page featured list on December 17, 2012. You can view the TFL blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured list/December 17, 2012. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured list directors The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) or Giants2008 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured list. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 December 2012[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Wadewitz. You have new messages at Drmies's talk page.
Message added 23:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

You may get a kick out of the reason I awarded myself a barnstar. Happy days! Drmies (talk) 23:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sensibility[edit]

Hi, just dropping by per your request on the "sensibility" talk page. Was wondering if it would be reasonable if I write up a small paragraph concerning Kant's version of sensibility (as to what it entails). Thanks! --VonKreuz (talk) 05:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds great! I wish I had more time to work on the article right now, but I would be happy to work with you on that bit! Wadewitz (talk) 22:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 December 2012[edit]

Rape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012[edit]

Thanks for any help. The article is in need of an experienced and non-involved editor taking a look at it and working with it. Any help you can provide would be wonderful. Casprings (talk) 00:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lynn Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extreme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you[edit]

The Literary Barnstar
For shiningly high quality encyclopaedic work on Jane Austen Whiteghost.ink (talk) 02:24, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting?[edit]

Hello! Do you still volunteer to help copyedit FA candidates? It's been awhile since I submitted one, but I have one here that I'm planning on nominating soon. If you're too busy, I understand. Cla68 (talk) 01:47, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 December 2012[edit]

Seasons greetings...[edit]

Happy Holidays
Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas 2012!

Happy New Year and all the best in 2013!

Thanks for all you do here,

and best wishes for the year to come.
Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2012[edit]

Happy New Year from the Literary Old Guard[edit]

Happy New Year from a fellow member of the Wikipedia "Literary Old Guard," meaning yeah, we've been editing here for what feels like forever. I hope things are going well. If you ever need any assistance from me on Wikipedia, please let me know. Best, --SouthernNights (talk) 14:56, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 December 2012[edit]

The Signpost: 07 January 2013[edit]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)![edit]

WikiWomen - We need you!
Hi Wadewitz! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

  • Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
  • Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
  • Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
  • Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
  • Reading and writing for our blog channel
  • Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
  • Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:46, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassadors update[edit]

Hi! You're getting this message because you are or have been a Wikipedia Ambassador. A new term is beginning for the United States and Canada Education Programs, and I wanted to give you an update on some important new information if you're interested in continuing your work this term as a Wikipedia Ambassador.

You may have heard a reference to a transition the education program is going through. This is the last term that the Wikimedia Foundation will directly run the U.S. and Canada programs; beginning in June, a proposed thematic organization is likely to take over organizing the program. You can read more about the proposal here.

Another major change in the program will take effect immediately. Beginning this term, a new MediaWiki education extension will replace all course pages and Ambassador lists. (See Wikipedia:Course pages and Help:Education Program extension for more details.) Included in the extension are online volunteer and campus volunteer user rights, which let you create and edit course pages and sign up as an ambassador for a particular course.

If you would like to continue serving as a Wikipedia Ambassador — even if you do not support a class this term — you must create an ambassador profile. If you're no longer interested in being a Wikipedia Ambassador, you don't need to do anything.

Please do these steps as soon as possible

First, you need the relevant user rights for Online and/or Campus Ambassadors. (If you are an admin, you can grant the rights yourself, for you as well as other ambassadors.) Just post your rights request here, and we'll get you set up as quickly as possible.

Once you've got the ambassador rights, please set up at a Campus and/or Online Ambassador profile. You can do so at:

Going forward, the lists of Ambassadors at Special:CampusAmbassadors and Special:OnlineAmbassadors will be the official roster of who is an active Ambassador. If you would like to be an Ambassador but not ready to serve this term, you can un-check the option in your profile to publicly list it (which will remove your profile from the list).

After that, you can sign on to support courses. The list of courses will be at Special:Courses. (By default, this lists "Current" courses, but you can change the Status filter to "Planned" to see courses for this term that haven't reached their listed start date yet.)

As this is the first term we have used the extension, we know there will be some bugs, and we know the feature set is not as rich as it could be. (A big wave of improvements is already in the pipeline. And if you know MediaWiki and could help with code review, we'd love to have your help!) Please reach out to me (Sage Ross) with any complaints, bug reports, and feature suggestions. The basic features of the extension are documented at Wikipedia:Course pages, and you can see a tutorial for setting up and using them here.

Communication and keeping up to date

In the past, the Education Program has had a pretty fragmented set of communication channels. We're trying to fix that. These are the recommended places to discuss and stay up-to-date on the education program:

  1. The education noticeboard has become the main on-wiki location for discussion of the Education Program. You can post there about broad education program issues as well as issues with individual courses.
  2. The Ambassadors Announce email list is a very low-traffic announcements list of important information all Ambassadors need to be aware of. We encourage all Ambassadors (and other interested Wikipedians) to subscribe to the list; follow the instructions on the link to add your email address.
  3. If you use IRC regularly, or need to try to reach someone immediately, the #wikipedia-en-ambassadors connect IRC channel is the place to find me and fellow Ambassadors.
Ambassador training and resources

We now have an online training for Ambassadors, which is intended to be both an orientation about the Wikipedia Ambassador role for newcomers and the manual for how to do the role. (There are parallel trainings for students and for educators as well.)

Please go through the training if you feel like you need a refresher on how a typical class is supposed to go and where the Ambassadors fit in, or if you want to review and help improve it. If there's something you'd like to see added, or other suggestions you have for it, feel free to edit the training and/or leave feedback. A primer on setting up and using course pages is included in the educators' training.

The Resources page of the training is the main place for Ambassador-related resources. If there's something you think is important as a resource that's not on there, please add it.

Finally, whether or not you work with any classes this term, I encourage you to post entries to the Trophy Case whenever you see excellent work from students or if you have great examples from past semesters. And, as always, let students (and other editors!) know when they do things well; a little WikiLove goes a long way!

--Sage Ross (WMF) (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance: reception history of Jane Austen[edit]

This is a note to let the main editors of reception history of Jane Austen know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on January 28, 2013. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 28, 2013. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegates Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), Gimmetoo (talk · contribs), and Bencherlite (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you can change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Jane Austen by her sister Cassandra

The reception history of Jane Austen follows a path from modest fame to wild popularity; her novels are both the subject of intense scholarly study and the centre of a diverse fan culture. Austen, the author of such works as Pride and Prejudice (1813) and Emma (1815), is one of the best-known and widely read novelists in the English language. During her lifetime, Austen's novels brought her little personal fame; like many women writers, she published anonymously. At the time they were published, her works were considered fashionable by members of high society but received few positive reviews. By the mid-19th century, her novels were admired by members of the literary elite, but it was not until the 1940s that Austen was widely accepted in academia as a "great English novelist". The second half of the 20th century saw a proliferation of scholarship exploring artistic, ideological and historical aspects of her works. As of the early 21st century, Austen fandom supports an industry of printed sequels and prequels as well as television and film adaptations, which started with the 1940 Pride and Prejudice and includes the 2004 Bollywood-style production Bride and Prejudice. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 January 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 21 January 2013[edit]

The King and I is at FAC[edit]

Hi, Wadewitz. The King and I has been nominated for FAC. I know that you have reviewed FACs in the performing arts area before. It would be great if you could take a look at the article and give comments at the FAC. Thanks for any time you could spare! -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I read this first thing in the morning, and what an absolutely beautiful article. Made my day. :) --smarojit (buzz me) 08:39, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Wadewitz (talk) 18:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

teaching of reading
Thank you for expanding our knowledge of literature and of the people who love it, write it and teach it. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (24 November 2008)!

again, in style ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:34, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Wadewitz (talk) 18:43, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 January 2013[edit]

The Signpost: 04 February 2013[edit]

Hello![edit]

Hello to myself - I'm so excited I just bought a car. Queeralice (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is so amazing. Your life is changed. Queeralice (talk) 18:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - looking good....questions posed...go for thy life. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image hassles can be a bummer - I've been waiting for some time with Banksia oligantha.....(i.e. years...)Casliber (talk · contribs) 09:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we'll see what happens. Fair use in the meantime. Wadewitz (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 February 2013[edit]

Replaceable fair use File:LynnHillNoseFinalPitch.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LynnHillNoseFinalPitch.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 February 2013[edit]