Jump to content

User talk:TonyTheTiger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎WP:GANR: new section
Line 54: Line 54:
|<center>'''Your [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates|Featured picture candidate]] has been promoted'''</center> Your nomination for [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] status, '''[[:File:IIT Machinery Hall.jpg]]''', gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. [[User:Makeemlighter|Makeemlighter]] ([[User talk:Makeemlighter|talk]]) 22:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
|<center>'''Your [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates|Featured picture candidate]] has been promoted'''</center> Your nomination for [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] status, '''[[:File:IIT Machinery Hall.jpg]]''', gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates]]. [[User:Makeemlighter|Makeemlighter]] ([[User talk:Makeemlighter|talk]]) 22:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
|}
|}

== WP:GANR ==

Still no reply from Davanderluis. Maybe you should flick him an email just in case mine wasn't picked up. If you get no reply it would probably be best to find someone else to run/update the bot. I will ask for some advice on this front now. Cheers. [[User:Aircorn|AIR<font color="green">'''''corn'''''</font>]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 01:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:14, 3 February 2012

affiliations
WikiProject Chicago WP:CHICAGO
Director
(2006–present)
Four Award WP:FOUR
Director
(2009–2014)
(disputed, 2013–2014)
W Awards WP:WAWARD
Director
(2010–present)
WALRUS committee M:WALRUS
Committee
(2011–2013)
(2016–present)
Online Ambassadors WP:Ambassadors
(2011–2012)
2010 WP:CUP
2nd place
Most WP:DYKs in a round



Tony The Tiger interpretation: Freedom of expression does not exist unless freedom of expression is protected when and where the audience exists.



Recently listed good articles: The Daleks' Master PlanTwo Roosters Ice CreamSolomon Islands at the 2020 Summer OlympicsShore, ErnieSame Thing (EP)The Album (Jonas Brothers album)Big DuckIntro (End of the World)Richmond, Indiana, facility fireFallout OnlineBuangkok MRT stationHadriana in All My DreamsSchilke, ClaraSetzer Gabbiani



The oldest unreviewed good article nominations are: Women's International Democratic Federation (talk | history | start review) • 2022 City of Edinburgh Council election (talk | history | start review) • McLaren MCL60 (talk | history | start review) • Jews in the civil rights movement (talk | history | start review) • Infant school (talk | history | start review)


Articles currently listed for Good article community reassessment:


Tigers on my userpage (feel free to add "free use" tiger)

If you appreciate my work above leave a tiger below. If you have trouble finding one that you don't see below go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tiger and click on any of the subspecies to see more Images.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.


WikiCup 2012 January newsletter

WikiCup 2012 is off to a flying start. At the time of writing, we have 112 contestants; comparable to last year, but slightly fewer than 2010. Signups will remain open for another week, after which time they will be closed for this year. Our currrent far-away leader is Conradh na Gaeilge Grapple X (submissions), due mostly to his work on a slew of good articles about The X-Files; there remain many such articles waiting to be reviewed at good article candidates. Second place is currently held by Minnesota Ruby2010 (submissions), whose points come mostly from good articles about television episodes, although good article reviews, did you knows and an article about a baroness round out the score. In third place is Mauritius Jivesh boodhun (submissions), who has scored 200 points for his work on a single featured article, as well as points for work on others, mostly in the area of pop music. In all, nine users have 100 or more points. However, at the other end of the scale, there are still dozens of participants who are yet to score. Please remember to update your submission pages promptly!

The 64 highest scoring participants will advance to round 2 in a month's time. There, they will be split into eight random groups of eight. The score needed to reach the next round is not at all clear; last year, 8 points guaranteed a place. The year before, 20.

A few participants and their work warrant a mention for achieving "firsts" in this competition.

  • Florida 12george1 (submissions) was the first to score, with his good article review of Illinois v. McArthur.
  • Florida 12george1 (submissions) was also the first to score points for an article, thanks to his work on Hurricane Debby (1982)- now a good article. Tropical storms have featured heavily in the Cup, and good articles currently have a relatively fast turnaround time for reviews.
  • Russia Sp33dyphil (submissions) was the first to score points for a did you know, with Russian submarine K-114 Tula. Military history is another subject which has seen a lot of Cup activity.
  • Russia Sp33dyphil (submissions) is also the first person to successfully claim bonus points. Terminator 2: Judgment Day is now a good article, and was eligible for bonus points because the subject was covered on more than 20 other Wikipedias at the start of the competition. It is fantastic to see bonus points being claimed so early!
  • Byzantine Empire Speciate (submissions) was the first to score points for an In the News entry, with Paedophryne amauensis. The lead image from the article was also used on the main page for a time, and it's certainly eye-catching!
  • Mauritius Jivesh boodhun (submissions) was the first to score points for a featured article, and is, at the moment, the only competitor to claim for one. The article, "Halo" (Beyoncé Knowles song), was also worth double points because of its wide coverage. While this is an article that Jivesh and others have worked on for some time, it is undeniable that he has put considerable work into it this year, pushing it over the edge.

We are yet to see any featured lists, featured topics or good topics, but this is unsurprising; firstly, the nomination processes with each of these can take some time, and, secondly, it can take a considerable amount of time to work content to this level. In a similar vein, we have seen only one featured article. The requirement that content must have been worked on this year to be eligible means that we did not expect to see these at the start of the competition. No points have been claimed for featured portals or pictures, but these are not content types which are often claimed; the former has never made a big impact on the WikiCup, while the latter has not done so since 2009's competition.

A quick rules clarification before the regular notices: If you are concerned that another user is claiming points inappropriately, please contact a judge to take a look at the article. Competitors policing one another can create a bad atmosphere, and may lead to inconsistencies and mistakes. Rest assured that we, the judges, are making an effort to check submissions, but it is possible that we will miss something. On a loosely related note: If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Delray Brooks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hidalgo County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:IIT Machinery Hall.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Makeemlighter (talk) 22:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GANR

Still no reply from Davanderluis. Maybe you should flick him an email just in case mine wasn't picked up. If you get no reply it would probably be best to find someone else to run/update the bot. I will ask for some advice on this front now. Cheers. AIRcorn (talk) 01:14, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]