Talk:Jesus: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 46.60.253.133 - "→Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2021: new section" Tag: Reverted |
removed unsourced claim |
||
Line 193: | Line 193: | ||
I was browsing the InfoBox:Person template and noticed it has a years_active parameter. Based on the citations available in [[Chronology of Jesus]], I think we could reasonably list AD 28 (or 29) through death as active dates. I wondered if there'd be any support for doing so. [[User:Jtrevor99|Jtrevor99]] ([[User talk:Jtrevor99|talk]]) 19:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC) |
I was browsing the InfoBox:Person template and noticed it has a years_active parameter. Based on the citations available in [[Chronology of Jesus]], I think we could reasonably list AD 28 (or 29) through death as active dates. I wondered if there'd be any support for doing so. [[User:Jtrevor99|Jtrevor99]] ([[User talk:Jtrevor99|talk]]) 19:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC) |
||
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 November 2021 == |
|||
i am jesus <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/46.60.253.133|46.60.253.133]] ([[User talk:46.60.253.133#top|talk]]) 15:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 15:53, 18 November 2021
The answer to your question may already be in the FAQ. The FAQ provides links to archived talk page discussions. Please read the FAQ. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jesus article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments, look in the archives, and review the FAQ before commenting. |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Q1: What should this article be named?
A1: To balance all religious denominations this was discussed on this talk page and it was accepted as early as 2004 that "Jesus", rather than "Jesus Christ", is acceptable as the article title. The title Christ for Jesus is used by Christians, but not by Jews and Muslims. Hence it should not be used in this general, overview article. Similarly in English usage the Arabic Isa and Hebrew Yeshua are less general than Jesus, and cannot be used as titles for this article per WP:Commonname. Q2: Why does this article use the BC/AD format for dates?
A2: The use of AD, CE or AD/CE was discussed on the article talk page for a few years. The article started out with BC/AD but the combined format AD/CE was then used for some time as a compromise, but was the subject of ongoing discussion, e.g. see the 2008 discussion, the 2011 discussion and the 2012 discussion, among others. In April 2013 a formal request for comment was issued and a number of users commented. In May 2013 the discussion ended and the consensus of the request for comment was to use the BC/AD format. Q3: Did Jesus exist?
A3: Based on a preponderance of sources, this article is generally written as if he did. A more thorough discussion of the evidence establishing Jesus' historicity can be found at Historicity of Jesus and detailed criticism of the non-historicity position can be found at Christ myth theory. See the policy on the issue for more information.
Q4: Are the scholars who study Jesus all Christian?
A4: No. According to Bart D. Ehrman in How Jesus Became God (2014, ISBN 978-0-06-177818-6, p. 187), "most New Testament scholars are themselves Christian". However, scholars of many faiths have studied Jesus. There are three aspects to this question:
Q5: Why are some historical facts stated to be less certain than others?
A5: The difference is "historically certain" versus "historically probable" and "historically plausible". There are a number of subtle issues and this is a somewhat complicated topic, although it may seem simple at first:
Q6: Why is the infobox so brief?
A6: The infobox is intended to give a summary of the essential pieces of information, and not be a place to discuss issues in any detail. So it has been kept brief, and to the point, based on the issues discussed below.
Q7: Why is there no discussion of the legacy/impact of Jesus?
A7: That issue is inherently controversial, and has been discussed on the talk page for many years (see, e.g., the 2006 discussion, the June 2010 discussion, the November 2010 discussion). One user commented that it would turn out to be a discussion of the "impact of Christianity" in the end; because all impact was through the spread of Christianity in any case. So it has been left out due to those discussions. Q8: Why is there no discussion of Christian denominational differences?
A8: Christianity includes a large number of denominations, and their differences can be diverse. Some denominations do not have a central teaching office and it is quite hard to characterize and categorize these issues without a long discussion that will exceed the length limits imposed by WP:Length on articles. The discussion of the theological variations among the multitude of Christian denominations is beyond the scope of this article, as in this talk page discussion. Hence the majority and common views are briefly sketched and links are provided to other articles that deal with the theological differences among Christians. Q9: What is the correct possessive of Jesus?
A9: This article uses the apostrophe-only possessive: Jesus', not Jesus's. Do not change usage within quotes. That was decided in this discussion. Q10: Why does the article state "[m]ost Christians believe Jesus to be the incarnation of God the Son and the awaited messiah ...?" Don't all Christians believe this?
A10: Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view written utilizing reliable scholarly sources. It does not take a position on religious tenets. In this case, the sources cited clearly state "most", not "all", Christians hold the stated beliefs, as some sects and persons who describe themselves as "Christian", such as Unitarians, nevertheless do not hold these beliefs. This was agreed upon multiple times, including in this discussion.
References
|
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Other talk page banners | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added at the bottom
Jesus is a religious, cultural, worldwide icon, and is among the most influential people in human history. (Reference here) - User:Sleetimetraveller
"Etymology"?
I wanted to see what this article said about him being a "carpenter" ("stone-worker"?), and the first reference is Jesus' neighbors in Nazareth refer to him as "the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon",[54][55] "the carpenter's son",[56][57] or "Joseph's son".[58][59]
. This sentence is problematic on its face (it synthesizes a primary source, Mark, with other sources that used Mark and changed what Mark said to call him a son of a carpenter -- see Ehrman's "Great Courses" series The New Testament, lecture 11), but the bigger problem here seems to be that it has nothing to do with "etymology" -- is this a mistake from the section having been renamed at some point? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 04:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
How can Jesus be born in 4 BC?
The article says Jesus was born in 4 BC but BC stand for "before christ" and Jesus is christ so this means that Jesus was born 4 years before himself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aalaa324 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- To my surprise we don't seem to have an FAQ for this common question. For me the answer is two fold, firstly Wikipedia does not define these things it just reports them. Secondly if we shifted our year numbering system every time we got more information about the life of Jesus it would make for a confusing system. So the etymology of AD/BC has changed over time just like ~every other word. Dushan Jugum (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, essentially what Dushan said. When Dionysius Exiguus came up with Anno Domini dating, it shouldn't be too surprising that he did not do so with mechanical precision. Since adjusting the calendar would require redating literally everything, including the current year, the 1 BC/1 AD transition is now simply an accepted point that is no longer really tethered to the birth of Jesus, since that event can't be pinpointed today any more than when Mr. Exiguus tried. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC) ETA -- this is one of the reasons I prefer BCE/CE dating, as it sort of admits this bit of imprecision, but one's own mileage may vary, as they say.
- Dionysius Exiguus placed the Nativity of Jesus a few years after the currently accepted date for the death of Herod the Great. Since the Gospel of Matthew's narrative connects the nativity of Jesus to Herod's reign, either the Gospel or Dionysius were in error. Dimadick (talk) 05:38, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Citation 19
Currently, citation 19 mentions Powell, 1998 (168-73). I went to the cited book and read those pages, but failed to find any assertion that "the only records of Jesus' life are contained in the Gospels." Could somebody double check that this is the correct citation for this statement? Is there another reference that would be more suitable?
Choinierenate (talk) 20:22, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Proposed swapping of two phrases
Within the first paragraph, it states: "Jesus Christ was a first-century Jewish preacher and religious leader. He is the central figure of Christianity, the world's largest religion". I propose we swap it to be: "Jesus Christ is the central figure of Christianity, the world's largest religion. He was a first-century Jewish preacher and religious leader". The reason I suggest this is because this, and being the son of God, is what he is most known for and it makes more sense that it would be mentioned first (in my opinion at least). Please let me know what you think. Thanks. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- I would support this swap, for slightly different reasons: we obviously know he is the central figure in Christianity, but all knowledge of his first century existence is considerably more murky. I like to go with the definites first, therefore, you have my support. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 17:55, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your contributions. It has been a few days, so I will make the change now. - Therealscorp1an (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2021
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X (pronounced [இயேசு]) Captain9845 (talk) 15:21, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
I would like to convey the word 'Jesus Christ' in English as pronounced 'இயேசு' in Tamil Captain9845 (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Jesus (name) agrees with you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 22:27, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- If I may, the question is not whether that is the accurate name in Tamil but rather why it would be relevant to include Tamil. I can see no reason at all to include it. Jeppiz (talk) 23:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant that Jesus is a big subject, and this was fittingly mentioned in a related article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
25 December
@Aeden Noel: If the NT gospels are to be trusted, it wasn't in the winter. Otherwise, all bets are off. But Lupi has shown (Zaccaria, Dissertazioni ecc. del p. A.M. Lupi, Faenza, 1785, p. 219) that there is no month in the year to which respectable authorities have not assigned Christ's birth.
[1]. tgeorgescu (talk) 02:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed. December 25 was arbitrarily set because, amongst other reasons, (1) that was the date pagans celebrated the "birthday" of the sun (in association with winter solstice), and (2) that set Jesus' naming and circumcision, i.e. the date he was officially recognized as part of his family and the Jewish population, to January 1, 1 AD. If Luke's account is to believed, it's likely Jesus actually was born sometime between late spring and early fall, because shepherds could not be out in the open at night in Judean wintertimes - it would be too cold. Of course, ultimately the exact day doesn't matter that much. Jtrevor99 (talk) 19:15, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Years Active
I was browsing the InfoBox:Person template and noticed it has a years_active parameter. Based on the citations available in Chronology of Jesus, I think we could reasonably list AD 28 (or 29) through death as active dates. I wondered if there'd be any support for doing so. Jtrevor99 (talk) 19:40, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- FA-Class Christianity articles
- Top-importance Christianity articles
- FA-Class Christian theology articles
- Top-importance Christian theology articles
- Christian theology work group articles
- FA-Class Catholicism articles
- Top-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- FA-Class Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- Top-importance Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy articles
- FA-Class Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- Top-importance Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy articles
- FA-Class Jewish Christianity articles
- Top-importance Jewish Christianity articles
- WikiProject Jewish Christianity articles
- FA-Class Anglicanism articles
- Top-importance Anglicanism articles
- WikiProject Anglicanism articles
- FA-Class Latter Day Saint movement articles
- Top-importance Latter Day Saint movement articles
- WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- FA-Class Islam-related articles
- Mid-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- FA-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- FA-Class Bahá'í Faith articles
- High-importance Bahá'í Faith articles
- WikiProject Bahá'í Faith articles
- FA-Class Ancient Near East articles
- Mid-importance Ancient Near East articles
- Ancient Near East articles by assessment
- FA-Class Bible articles
- Top-importance Bible articles
- WikiProject Bible articles
- FA-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- High-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- FA-Class Greek articles
- High-importance Greek articles
- Byzantine world task force articles
- WikiProject Greece general articles
- All WikiProject Greece pages
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press