Jump to content

Criticism of communism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nikodemos (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Ultramarine (talk | contribs)
Restored correct referenced version, more references, imperialism, GDP, environment, human rights, minor fixes
Line 1: Line 1:
{{twoversions|24910923}}
{{npov}}
{{npov}}
{{twoversions|24910923}}
{{communism}}
:''Note that communism is a branch of [[socialism]]. This article only discusses criticisms that are specific to communism and not other forms of socialism. See [[criticisms of socialism]] for a discussion of objections to socialism in general.
:''Note that communism is a branch of [[socialism]]. This article only discusses criticisms that are specific to communism and not other forms of socialism. See [[criticisms of socialism]] for a discussion of objections to socialism in general. Note also that communism and related words are written with the [[uppercase]] "C" when they refer to a political party of that name, a member of that party, or a government led by such a party.''
Criticisms of [[communism]] can be divided in two broad categories: One is those concerning themselves with the real-world results of the 20th century [[Communist state]]s. Such critics include both pro and anti communists. Another is those concerning themselves with [[Marxism]], the claimed [[Ideologies of parties|political ideology]] of the Communist states. A central question is the implications of the real-world results of the Communist states for Marxist theory.
{{Template:Communism}}
== Criticisms of 20th century Communist states ==
===Human rights violations===
Extensive historical research, especially after the fall of Communism opened the archives of many of the former Communist states, has documented the large scale human rights violations that occurred in these states. Several of the most prominent researchers are former communists who become disillusioned with the Communist system they had powerful positions in, like [[Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev]] and [[Dmitri Volkogonov]], or after they started their research, like several of the authors of ''[[The Black Book of Communism]]''. [[Robert Conquest]], another former communist, was one of the first to document the [[Great Purge]] in his book ''[[The Great Terror]]'' and was vehemently criticized for this by many Western intellectuals. He was vindicated when the achieves were opened. [[Jung Chang]], one of the authors of ''[[Mao: The Unknown Story]]'', was a [[Red Guard]] in her youth. See the end of the article for an extensive reference list.


{| {{prettytable}} ALIGN="left"
'''Criticisms of [[communism]]''' can be divided in two broad categories: Those concerning themselves with the practical aspects of 20th century [[Communist state]]s, and those concerning themselves with communist principles and theory. The two categories are logically distinct: One may agree with communist principles but disagree with many policies adopted by Communist states (and this is quite common among communists, particularly in the case of [[Trotskyism|Trotskyists]]), or, more rarely, one may agree with policies adopted by Communist states but disagree with communist principles.
|+ '''Numbers killed by Communist states{{ref|Courtois-intro}}'''
|-
| [[Soviet Union]] || 20 million
|-
| [[China]] || 65 million
|-
| [[Vietnam]] || 1 million
|-
| [[North Korea]] || 2 million
|-
| [[Cambodia]] || 2 million
|-
| [[Eastern Europe]] || 1 million
|-
| [[Latin America]] || 150,000
|-
| [[Africa]] || 1.7 million
|-
| [[Afghanistan]] || 1.5 million
|-
| colspan="100" |
|}


The human rights violations were particularly intensive during the regimes of [[Stalin]] and [[Mao Zedong|Mao]], but started immediately after the [[Russian revolution]] during the regime of [[Lenin]]. Most prominent are deaths due to executions, forced labor camps, [[genocide]]s of certain ethnic minorities, and mass starvations caused by either government mismanagement or deliberately. The exact number of deaths caused by these regimes is somewhat disputed, but the historical research shows at least tens of millions and several overviews give a number close to one hundred million deaths.{{ref|Totals}} Yakovlev, the researcher with the best access to the Soviet achieves, have recently stated that in the Soviet Union alone 20-25 millions were killed for political motives or in prisons and camps. More than 10.5 million died from famine.{{ref|Yakovlev-deaths}} Some particularly brutal episodes were the [[Holodomor]], the [[Great Purge]], the [[Great Leap Forward]], and [[The Killing Fields]].
In the [[English language]], the word ''communism'' and related terms are written with the [[uppercase]] "C" when they refer to a political party of that name, a member of that party, or a government led by such a party. When written as a common noun, with a lowercase "c", they refer to a future condition of [[egalitarianism|egalitarian]], classless and stateless community, or to the idea that such a condition is desirable and achievable. Thus, one may be a communist (an advocate of communism) without being a Communist (a member of a Communist Party or another similar organization). This distinction between ''communism'' (lowercase "c") and ''Communism'' (uppercase "C") is used throughout the present article.


Yakovlev is especially critical of the treatment of millions of children of claimed political opponents. Children of former Imperial officers and peasants were held as hostages and sometimes shot during the [[Russian Civil War]]. The children of soldiers who surrendered during WWII could be punished. Some children followed their parents to the [[Gulag]]s, where their mortality rate was especially high. In [[1954]] there were 884,057 "specially resettled" children under the age of sixteen. Others were placed in special orphanages run by the secret police in order to be reeducated, often losing even their names, and were considered socially dangerous also as adults.{{ref|Yakovlev-children}}
== 20th century Communist states ==
Communism is a social system that abolishes [[property|private property]], [[social class]]es, and the [[government|state]] itself. As such, a "communist state" would be a [[paradox]]. No country or government ever called itself a "Communist state"; however, various states gave the [[Communist Party]] a special status in their constitution and laws [http://www.oefre.unibe.ch/law/icl/r100000_.html], while claiming to be heading in the direction of communism. The term "Communist state" has been coined and used in [[Western bloc|the West]] to refer to such countries. It is these "Communist states" ([[single-party state]]s where the ruling party officially proclaimed its adherence to [[Marxism-Leninism]]) that are the targets of criticism presented below.


Other criticisms concern lack of [[freedom of speech]]{{ref|FreeSpeech}} and religious and ethnic [[persecution]]s.{{ref|FreeRelNat}} The use of an extensive network of civilian [[informants]], sometimes including family members, created a society where no one could trust other citizens.{{ref|Informants}} In some Communist states it was common practice to classify internal critics of the system as having a mental disease, like [[sluggishly progressing schizophrenia]] - which was only recognized in Communist states - and incarcerate them in [[mental hospitals]].{{ref|Psyche}} Workers were not allowed to join free [[trade union]]s.{{ref|Unions}} Several internal uprisings were suppressed by military force, like the [[Tambov rebellion]], the [[Kronstadt rebellion]], and the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]]. Some Communist states directly supported claimed [[terrorist group]]s. Examples include the [[PFLP]], the [[Red Army Fraction]], and the [[Japanese Red Army]].{{ref|Courtois-terrorism}}
''For related information, see the discussion regarding the [[Communist state#Definition of a Communist state|definition of a Communist state]].''


Another criticism is [[imperialism]]. Lenin in [[1917]] declared the unconditional right of self-determination and separation for the national minorities. Despite this, when the Russian Civil War was won he used military force to conquer the newly independent nations [[Armenia]], [[Georgia]], and [[Azerbaijan]].{{ref|Pipes-imperialism}} Stalin conquered the Baltic [[states]] and created [[satellite states]] in Eastern Europe. China conquered [[Tibet]]. Soviet forces intervened against anti-Communist uprisings during the [[1956 Hungarian Revolution]], the [[Prague Spring]], and the [[Soviet invasion of Afghanistan]].
No Communist state claimed to have ''attained'' communism, the social system, but all of them planned to do so in the not unreasonably distant future; [[Khrushchev]], for example, forecast that communism would be reached in the [[Soviet Union]] by 1980, some quarter century later. The states which no longer exist never did reach communism, and none of the remaining ones seem likely to do so soon.


The leaders of the Communist states themselves frequently announced their support for democracy, held regular elections and sometimes even gave their countries names such as the "[[German Democratic Republic]]" or the "[[North Korea|Democratic People's Republic of Korea]]". Some supporters of the Communist states have argued that those states were democratic. However, critics point out that, in practice, one political party held an absolute monopoly on power, dissent was banned, and the elections usually featured a single candidate and were ripe with fraud (often producing implausible results of 99% in favor of the candidate). Many of the leaders of Communist states cultivated an extensive [[personality cult]]. In some cases the leadership of the state became inherited.
=== Anti-communist critique of Communist states ===
====Censorship, personality cults, and foreign policy====
The Communist states often practice [[censorship]]. The level of censorship varies widely between different states and historical periods, but it nearly always exists to a greater or lesser extent. The most rigid censorship has been practiced by hardline [[Stalinism|Stalinist]] and [[Maoism|Maoist]] regimes, such as the [[Soviet Union]] under [[Stalin]] (1927–53), [[People's Republic of China|China]] during the [[Cultural Revolution]] (1966–76), and [[North Korea]] during its entire existence (1948–present). This censorship takes various forms:


The escape valve of last resort from repressive regimes is emigration, but the communist states were notorious for violently preventing and severely punishing attempts to escape. The anti-democratic nature of these regimes is perhaps best revealed by this prevention of even allowing citizens to "vote with their feet". The most famous example is the [[Berlin Wall]].
*Censorship of the [[arts]], for example by allowing only [[Socialist realism]]. Some Communist states have also been involved in the destruction of cultural heritage: [[Romania]] (planned destruction of historical centres of most towns—partially achieved in Bucharest), [[China]] (repression of [[Tibet]]an culture, destruction of cultural artifacts during the [[Cultural Revolution]]) and the Soviet Union (destruction, abandonment or reconversion of religious buildings) are the most cited examples.
*Censorship of [[science]]. One example is censorship and [[revisionism]] of history. In the Soviet Union, between the late 1920s and early 1960s, research was suppressed in [[biology]] and [[genetics]] ([[Lysenkoism]]), [[linguistics]] ([[Japhetic theory (linguistics)|Japhetic theory]]), [[cybernetics]], [[psychology]] and [[psychiatry]], and even [[organic chemistry]]. In some Communist states it was common practice to classify internal critics of the system as having a mental disease, like [[sluggishly progressing schizophrenia]]—which was a disease only recognized in Communist states—and incarcerating them in [[mental hospitals]]. See also [[Suppressed research in the Soviet Union]].
*Censorship of [[dissent]]. Many Communist states use an extensive network of civilian [[informants]] to spy on their peers. This creates a society where no one would dare criticize the government in public (and, in extreme cases, not even in private), for fear that they might be reported to the [[secret police]].


=== Comparison with human rights violations in other political systems ===
Both anti-Communists and Communists have criticized the [[personality cult]]s of many leaders of Communist states, and the hereditary leadership of [[North Korea]]. [[Milovan Djilas]] and others have also argued that a powerful [[new class]] of party bureaucrats emerged under Communist Party rule, and exploited the rest of the population. A Czech proverb observed, "Under capitalism, man exploits man; under Communism, it's the other way around." (see also [[nomenklatura]])


Some supporters of communism find this approach simplistic, noting that humans rights violations such as executions, forced labor camps, the repression of ethnic minorities, and mass starvation were patterns in both non-democratic Russian and Chinese history before their respective Communist takeovers, and that later the opposing capitalist states also committed some human rights violations, like [[state terrorism]]. However, evils in other regimes can hardly be used to justify new ones. Advocates reply that they only seek to put the events into perspective, not justify them. Also this defense can be criticized. Any attempt similarly to similarly relativize Nazi and fascist crimes would be widely seen as obnoxious. Moreover, [[Alexander Solzhenitsyn]] argues in his book ''[[Gulag Archipelago]]'' that the living conditions and death rates of the inmates in the Soviet era [[Gulags]] were much worse than those of the Czarist era [[Katorga]]s. The worst crop failure of late Czarist Russia, in 1892, caused 375,000 to 400,000 deaths, while famines under both Lenin and Stalin caused many millions of deaths.{{ref|Pipes-famine}}{{ref|Conquest-famine}} The Czarist regime executed 3,932 persons for political crimes between [[1825]] and [[1910]]. 681,692 persons were executed between [[1937]] and [[1938]] during the Great Purge.{{ref|Pipes-executions}}
The Communist states also typically suppress mass dissent. Internal uprisings were forcibly suppressed in the [[Kronstadt rebellion]] and the [[Tiananmen Square protests of 1989]]. The Soviet Union intervened three times in neighboring countries to defeat popular uprisings against a Communist state: the [[Soviet invasion of Afghanistan]], the [[Prague spring]] and the [[1956 Hungarian Revolution]]. These invasions have also been criticized as naked [[imperialism]].


Another comparison may be to the deaths caused by capitalism during several centuries, a number claimed by some (for example, the French book ''Le Livre Noir du capitalisme'' - "The Black Book of capitalism") to be far greater. However, this was achieved by counting the crimes of colonialism or imperialism, where defenders of capitalism would argue that the deaths were caused by anti-capitalism, i.e. by reducing the [[Index of economic freedom|economic freedom]] of people. But this defense of capitalism may be similar to the defense of communism that the Communist states were not "real" communist societies. A better comparison may be to [[liberal democracy|liberal democracies]]. According to the research supporting the [[democratic peace theory]], they have very low levels of systematic violence.
Restrictions on [[emigration]] are widely seen as a mechanism for suppressing dissent. The [[Berlin wall]] was one of the most famous examples of this, but North Korea still imposes a total ban on emigration (reported on PBS's program [[Frontline]]) and Cuba's restrictions are routinely criticized by the [[Cuban-American]] community.


According to the [[historian]] [[Richard Pipes]], the Communist states share some responsibility for [[WWII]]. Both [[Hitler]] and [[Mussolini]] used the Soviet Union as a model for their own [[totalitarian]] states and Hitler privately expressed that Stalin was a "genius". In turn, Stalin expressed desire for another great war that would leave his enemies weakened. He allowed the testing and production of German weapons that were forbidden by the [[Versailles Treaty]] to occur on Soviet territory. During the critical [[1932]] German elections, he forbid the German Communists from collaborating with the Social Democrats. These parties together gained more votes than Hitler and could have prevented him from becoming Chancellor.{{ref|Pipes-wwii}}
====Human rights violations====
Large scale human rights violations occurred in Communist states. The most common of these were restrictions on [[freedom of speech]] (in the form of censorship, discussed above). Such restrictions existed, to a greater or lesser degree, in nearly all Communist states during most of their existence. Usually, newly established Communist states maintained or tightened the level of censorship that was present in those countries before the Communists came to power; indeed, the Communists themselves had most often been the targets of this previous censorship. As a result, after coming to power, they argued that they wanted to fight the former ruling class using its own weapons, either as a form of vengeance or to prevent it from staging a counter-revolution.


===Economic and social development===
However, some Communist states - particularly the regimes of [[Stalin]] and [[Mao Zedong|Mao]] - engaged in far more severe human rights violations. Most prominent were deaths due to executions, forced labor camps, genocides of certain ethnic minorities, and mass starvations caused by either government mismanagement or deliberately. The exact number of deaths caused by these regimes is somewhat disputed, but extensive historical research shows at least tens of millions (see, e.g., the estimates reached in ''[[The Black Book of Communism]]'' and the references below). A feature of controversial significance of these estimates is that they far exceed the number of deaths under [[fascism|fascist]] regimes during the twentieth century (including [[Nazi Germany]]). Some anti-communists have used this to argue that Communist states were worse than fascist ones; others point out that Communist states were greater in number, lasted longer and ruled over a much larger population than fascist states.
Advocates of central economic planning claim that it has in certain instances produced dramatic advances, including rapid industrialization of the Soviet Union, especially during the 1930s. Another example is the development of the pharmaceutical industry in [[Cuba]]. New research shows that the Soviet figures were largely fabricated, especially those from the Stalin era. Growth was more impressive in 1950s and 1960s but later declined and according to some estimates become negative in the late eighties.{{ref|SovGDP1}}{{ref|SovGDP2}} Before the [[collectivization]], Russia had been the "breadbasket of Europe," supplying 40% of the world’s wheat exports in the bumper years [[1909]] and [[1910]]. The Soviet Union became a net importer of grain, unable to produce enough food to feed its own population.{{ref|Bumper}}


China and Vietnam achieved much higher rates of growth after introducing capitalist economic reforms and the higher growth rates was accompanied by declining poverty.{{ref|ChinaCap}}{{ref|VietnamCap}} The Communist states do not compare favorable when looking at divided nations with similar culture before the Communist takeovers: [[North Korea]] vs. [[South Korea]]; [[China]] vs. [[Hong Kong]] and [[Taiwan]]; and [[East Germany]] vs. [[West Germany]]. East vs. West German [[Productivity (economics)|productivity]] was around 90% in 1936{{ref|1936}} and around 60-65% in 1954.{{ref|1954}} When compared to the EU, the East German productivity declined from 67% in 1950 to 50% before the unification in 1989. All the Eastern European nations had productivity far below the EU average.{{ref|1989}} Unlike the slow transition in China and Vietnam, the abrupt end to central planning was followed by a [[Depression (economics)|depression]] in many of the states of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. As of 2003, all of them have positive economic growth and almost all have a higher GDP/capita than before the transition.{{ref|Transition}}
Lesser violations include religious and ethnic [[persecution]]s, systematic use of [[torture]] as part of police procedure, lack of [[democracy]], and the fact that workers were not allowed to join free [[labor union]]s.
[[Image:World energy intensity by region 1970-2025.png|thumb|200px|right|The Communist states used their energy inefficiently, getting much less economic growth from the same amount of energy than the Western nations and the Third World. However, it can be argued that there was little need for energy efficiency since the Soviet Union was a net exporter of oil and gas and China has large coal reserves.]]


Supporters of the Communist states note the social and cultural programs, sometimes administered by labor organizations. They included in theory guaranteed [[employment]], subsidized food and clothing, free [[health care]], free [[child care]], and free [[education]]. Early advances in the status of women were also notable, especially in [[Islamic]] areas of the Soviet Union.{{ref|MoslemWomen}} They point out to the claimed high levels of literacy enjoyed by Eastern Europeans (in comparison, for instance, with Southern Europe), Cubans or Chinese.
Some advocates of Communist states find this approach simplistic, noting that executions, forced labor camps, the repression of ethnic minorities, and mass starvation were patterns in both Russian and Chinese history before their respective Communist revolutions. Critics argue that past evils in an old regime cannot be used to justify new ones, while advocates reply that they only seek to put the events into perspective, not justify them.


However, again the Communist parts of the divided nations do not compare favorably. Millions died in famines in Communist China and North Korea.{{ref|FamChina}}{{ref|FamNorthKor}} East Germans were shorter than West Germans and this difference increased with time, probably due to differences in factors such as nutrition and medical services.{{ref|Height}} Life satisfaction increased in East Germany after the reunification.{{ref|Happiness}} The Soviet education system was full of [[propaganda]] and of low quality. The Soviet Union spent far less on health care than the Western nations and in the 1970s and 1980s the quality was deteriorating. The pension and welfare programs failed to provide adequate protection.{{ref|EduHealth}}
====Economic and social development====
[[Image:World energy intensity by region 1970-2025.png|thumb|330px|right|According to the [[United States Department of Energy]], the Communist states maintained a much higher level of [[energy intensity]] than either the Western nations or the Third World, at least after 1970. Energy-intensive development may have been reasonable. The Soviet Union was an exporter of [[oil]]; China has vast supplies of [[coal]].]]
Advocates of Communist states often praise them for having leapt ahead of contemporary capitalist countries in certain areas, for example by offering guaranteed employment, health care and housing to their citizens. Critics typically condemn Communist states by the same criteria, claiming that all lag far behind the industrialized West in terms of economic development and living standards.


In the Soviet Union in 1989 there was rationing of meat and sugar. The average intake of [[red meat]] for a Soviet citizen was half of what it had been for a subject of the Czar in [[1913]]. Blacks in [[apartheid]] [[South Africa]] owned more cars per capita. The only area of consumption in which the Soviets excelled was the ingestion of [[hard liquor]]. Two-thirds of the households had no hot water, and a third had no running water at all. According to the government paper, [[Izvestia]], a typical working class family of four was forced to live for 8 years in a single 8x8 foot room, before marginally better accommodation became available. The housing shortage was so acute that at all times 17% of Soviet families had to be physically separated for want of adequate space. A third of the hospitals had no running water and the bribery of doctors and nurses to get decent medical attention and even amenities like blankets in Soviet hospitals was not only common, but routine. Only 15 percent of Soviet youth were able to attend institutions of higher learning compared to 34 percent in the U.S. The average welfare mother in the United States received more income in a month, than the average Soviet worker could earn in a year.{{ref|LivingStand}}
Central economic planning has in certain instances produced dramatic advances, including rapid development of heavy industry during the 1930s in the Soviet Union and later in their [[Soviet space program|space program]]. Another example is the development of the pharmaceutical industry in Cuba. Early advances in the status of women were also notable, especially in Islamic areas of the Soviet Union. See Gregory J. Massell, ''The Surrogate Proletariat: Moslem Women and Revolutionary Strategies in Soviet Central Asia: 1919–1929'', Princeton University Press, 1974, hardcover, 451 pages, ISBN 069107562X. However, the Soviet Union did not achieve the same kind of development in agriculture (forcing the Soviet Union to become a net importer of cereals after the Second World War). Other Communist states, such as Laos, Vietnam or Maoist China, continued in poverty; China has only achieved high rates of growth after introducing free market economic reforms — a sign, claim the critics, of the superiority of capitalism. Another example is [[Czechoslovakia]], which was among world's most developed industrial countries prior to [[World War II]], but fell behind the West in the post-war era.


After 1965, [[life expectancy]] began to plateau or even decreased, especially for males, in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe while it continued to increase in Western Europe. This divergence between two parts of Europe went on during three decades leading to a profound gap in the mid 90s. The life expectancy sharply declined after the change to market economy in several of the states of the former Soviet Union but may now have started to increase in the [[Baltic states]]. In several Eastern European nations life expectancy started to increase immediately after the fall of Communism. The previous decline for males continued for a time in some, like [[Romania]], before starting to increase.{{ref|LifeExp}}
Both critics and supporters also make comparisons between particular Communist and capitalist countries: Critics prefer to compare [[East Germany|East]] and [[West Germany]]; supporters prefer to compare [[Cuba]] to [[Jamaica]] or Central America. All such comparisons are open to challenge, both on the comparability of the states involved and the statistic being used for comparison. No two countries are identical; the western parts of Germany were more developed and industrialized than the eastern parts long before the Cold War and the creation of two separate German states, and Cuba was likewise more developed than many of its Central American neighbors before the Cuban revolution. Comparison of Cuba to the rest of the Caribbean or Latin America has a special problem: Cuba is the only Latin American country to have been Communist for forty years; it is also the only Latin American country to have been for forty years under embargo by its largest neighbor and geographically natural trading partner. Deconfounding those two uniquenesses is beyond the reach of ''honest'' statistics.


[[Milovan Djilas]], once one of the most powerful leaders in Communist [[Yugoslavia]], in his book ''[[New class|New Class]]'' argued that a new powerful class of party bureaucrats emerged which exploited the rest of the population. In the Soviet Union this group was known as the [[Nomenklatura]].
Communist states often engaged in rapid [[industrialization]], and in some cases this has lead to environmental disasters. The most cited example is the disappearance of the [[Aral Sea]] in today's [[Uzbekistan]] and [[Kazakhstan]], which is believed to have been caused by the diversion of the waters of its two affluent rivers for cotton production. The [[Caspian Sea]] has also been diminishing; in addition, there was significant pollution of the [[Black Sea]], the [[Baltic Sea]], and the unique freshwater environment of [[Lake Baikal]]. In 1988 only 20% of the [[sewage]] in the Soviet Union was treated properly. Established health standards for [[air pollution]] were exceeded by ten times or more in 103 cities in 1988. In Eastern Europe, air pollution is cited as the cause of forest die-back, damage to buildings and cultural heritages, and a rise in the occurrence of [[lung cancer]]. According to official sources, 58 percent of the total agricultural land of the former Soviet Union was affected by [[salinization]], [[erosion]], [[acidity]], or [[waterlogging]]. Nuclear waste was dumped in the [[Sea of Japan]], the [[Arctic Ocean]], and in locations in the Far East. It was revealed in 1992 that in the city of [[Moscow]] there were 636 radioactive toxic waste sites and 1,500 in [[St. Petersburg]].[http://www.loc.gov/rr/scitech/tracer-bullets/sovietenvtb.html][http://www.lanic.utexas.edu/la/cb/cuba/asce/cuba8/22diaz.pdf] The Vistula was poisoned with mining spoil, agricultural runoff, and sewage; its fish were inedible, its waters green with algae; much of its water was unsafe to drink. [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08040943.x]


Cuba is often cited as a successful example by communists. However, Cuba was one of most developed nations in [[Latin America]] before Castro. Other Latin American nations have seen greater increases in literacy than Cuba. Calories per person have declined in Cuba while it has increased in most other Latin American nations. Cubans eat less cereals and meat than before Castro.{{ref|Cuba}} On the other hand, there is a [[United States embargo against Cuba]].
However, many of these ecological problems continued unabated after the fall of the Soviet Union and are still major issues today - which has prompted many supporters of Communist states to accuse their opponents of holding a [[double standard]].


=== Arts, science, technology, and environment ===
Technological progress in the Communist states was sometimes highly uneven, in the sense that some sectors surged ahead while others lagged behind. As noted above, the Soviet space program saw remarkable progress; so did pure science (in fields not blighted by ideological pressure), mathematics, and military technology. Consumer products, on the other hand, were typically several years behind their Western counterparts. According to the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]] [http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/96unclass/farewell.htm], a number of Soviet products were in fact using Western technology, which had been either legally purchased or obtained through espionage. This situation has been largely attributed to the fact that economic planners in the Soviet Union and elsewhere were accountable to the government, but, in the absence of democracy, they were not accountable to the people. Thus, their plans tended to focus on long-term goals and scientific and military development, rather than the immediate needs of the population.


The Communist states censored the [[arts]], usually only allowing [[socialist realism]]. Some Communist states have been involved in the destruction of cultural heritage: the historical center of [[Bucharest]], hundreds of churches in the Soviet Union, and the [[Cultural Revolution]] are some examples.{{ref|Courtois-intro2}}
[[Life expectancy]] has increased in fits and starts in the West. The latest of these began about 1970, and largely consists of improvements in [[cardiovascular]] [[medicine]]. Demographic studies (including [http://www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/workshops/020619_paper27.pdf this one]) have concluded that the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe did not partake of this increase, as they had in the earlier ones; male life expectancies even decreased by a year - leading to a large gap between East and West by 1990. Since a market economy was introduced, a sharp decline in life expectancy was noted in the countries of the former Soviet Union. This decline has accelerated in [[Russia]] and [[Ukraine]]; in the [[Baltic states|Baltic republics]] life expectancy may have started to increase. In Eastern Europe, after 1990, the decline continued most notably in [[Romania]], but life expectancy eventually began to increase in many of the other countries in the region. All these developments give information on post-Soviet capitalism, especially the [[economy of Russia]], as well as on the policies of the Communist states.


Certain sciences were suppressed. One example is [[censorship]] and [[revisionism]] of [[history]]. Research was suppressed in [[biology]] and [[genetics]] (see [[Lysenkoism]]), [[linguistics]] (see [[Japhetic theory (linguistics)|Japhetic theory]]), [[cybernetics]], [[psychology]] and [[psychiatry]], and even [[organic chemistry]].(See [[suppressed research in the Soviet Union]]) The emphasis on the "[[hard sciences]]" produced mixed results.{{ref|Science}} There were very few [[Nobel Prize]] winners from Communist states.{{ref|Nobel}}
Supporters of the Communist states note their social and cultural programs, sometimes administered by labor organizations. Universal education programs have been a strong point, as has the generous provision of universal health care. They point out the high levels of literacy enjoyed by Eastern Europeans (in comparison, for instance, with Southern Europe), Cubans or Chinese. Western critics charge that Communist compulsory education was replete with pro-Communist propaganda and censored opposing views.


Soviet technology in many sectors lagged Western technology. Exceptions include areas like the [[Soviet space program]] and military technology where occasionally the Communist technology was more advanced due to a massive concentration of research resources. According to the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]], much of the technology in the Communist states consisted simply of copies of Western products that had been legally purchased or gained through a massive espionage program. Stricter Western control of the export of technology through [[COCOM]] and providing defective technology to Communist agents after the discovery of the [[Farewell Dossier]] contributed to the fall of Communism.{{ref|Tech}}{{ref|Tech2}}{{ref|Cocom}}
===Debunking===
Despite the problems above, there has been a considerable [[apologetic]] literature porclaiming the communist states behave dramatically better than other states; that the Soviet Union did not behave like other Great Powers; and, in extreme cases, that some Communist state (usually the Soviet Union, but often Maoist China or Cuba) was what [[Rebecca West]] referred to as the "Infant [[Samuel]] among the nations": innocent, holy, and much put-upon.


Also pointed out is the environmental disasters. One is the gradual disappearance of the [[Aral Sea]] and a similar diminishing of the [[Caspian Sea]] because of the diversion of the rivers that fed them. Another the pollution of the [[Black Sea]], the [[Baltic Sea]], and the unique freshwater environment of [[Lake Baikal]]. Many of the rivers were polluted; several, like the [[Vistula]] and [[Oder]] rivers in Poland, were virtually ecologically dead. Over 70% of the surface water in the Soviet Union was polluted. In 1988 only 30% of the [[sewage]] in the Soviet Union was treated properly. Established health standards for [[air pollution]] was exceeded by ten times or more in 103 cities in the Soviet Union in 1988. The air pollution problem was even more severe in Eastern Europe. It caused a rapid growth in [[lung cancer]], forest die-back, and damage to buildings and cultural heritages. According to official sources, 58 percent of total agricultural land of the former Soviet Union was affected by [[salinization]], [[erosion]], [[acidity]], or [[waterlogging]]. Nuclear waste was dumped in the [[Sea of Japan]], the [[Arctic Ocean]], and in locations in the Far East. It was revealed in 1992 that in the city of [[Moscow]] there were 636 radioactive toxic waste sites and 1,500 in [[St. Petersburg]].{{ref|Environment}}{{ref|Environment2}} The environmental situation has improved in every studied former Communist state.{{ref|Unece}}{{ref|Unep}}{{ref|Oecd}}{{ref|Air}}
Much criticism of Communism has been devoted to refuting such claims; most notably, perhaps, [[George Orwell]]'s ''[[Animal Farm]]'', which ends by displaying the Soviet leadership as indistinguishable from the British ruling class; at about the same time, Orwell described the Commmunist apologetics above mentioned as instances of "transferred [[nationalism]]" and held they had the disagreeable qualities of direct nationalism, often with the even greater rosiness of view possible to someone writing at a distance from a system he's never actually experienced. [http://www.k-1.com/Orwell/site/work/essays/nationalism.html]


=== Communist and Left critique of Communist states ===
===Socialist criticisms of the Communist states===
There were early Marxist critics of the first Communist states, like [[Mensheviks]] and [[Trotskyites]]. The [[revisionist]] Marxists, such as [[Eduard Bernstein]] and [[Karl Kautsky]] denied the necessity of a revolution. However, most foreign communists and Communist parties at first supported the Communist states and accepted the leadership of the Soviet Union (see [[Comintern]]). Criticisms gradually increased, especially after Stalin was denounced in the 1956 speech [[On the Personality Cult and its Consequences]], after the [[1956 Hungarian Revolution]], and after the fall of Communism in 1989-91.
Communist states are nominally based on [[Marxism-Leninism]], which is only one form of [[Marxism]], which is in turn only one school of the [[left-wing politics|Left]]. Many communists themselves disagree with some or most of the actions undertaken by Communist states during the 20th century. Many of the anti-communist criticisms presented in the above section (for example, criticisms of violations of human rights) are shared by the communist critics.


There were also early criticisms from non-Marxist socialists, like [[Bertrand Russell]] and [[Emma Goldman]]. Some, like [[H G Wells]], were initially supportive but gradually became more disillusioned as more details were revealed. Members of the [[Socialist-Revolutionary Party]] and the fraction the [[Left Socialist-Revolutionaries]] sometimes fought the [[Bolsheviks]] before and in the [[Russian Civil War]]. [[Fanya Kaplan]] tried to assassinate Lenin. The [[anarchism|anarchists]] have differed from Marx since [[Bakunin]].
Other varieties of the Left opposed Bolshevik plans before they was put into practice: The [[revisionist]] Marxists, such as [[Eduard Bernstein]] and [[Karl Kautsky]] denied the necessity of a revolution; the [[anarchism|anarchists]] had differed from Marx since [[Bakunin]], and the anarchist [[Left Socialist-Revolutionaries]] under [[Nestor Makhno]] were at war with Lenin, forming another of the many sides of the [[Russian Civil War]].


== Criticisms of Marxist theory ==
Marx and Engels (like [[Alexander Hamilton]]) did not believe that true [[liberal democracy]] was a ''possible'' form of government, since all states inherently give unlimited power to the [[ruling class]]. After the revolution, when all production was securely controlled by the proletariat, the state would eventually "wither away", since it would have no function.
See [[criticisms of socialism]] for a discussion of objections to socialism in general. There are also some specific criticisms of Marxist theory.


===Relevance of the Communist states for Marxist theory===
Criticisms of Communist states from the [[left-wing politics|Left]] began very soon after the creation of the first such state. [[Bertrand Russell]] visited Russia in 1920, and regarded the [[Bolsheviks]] as intelligent, but clueless and planless. [[Emma Goldman]] condemned the suppression of the [[Kronstadt rebellion]] as a 'massacre'.
Marxist critics of the Communist states argue that the problems in the Communist states cannot be used to criticize Marxist theory and the communist society. One argument is that a "Communist state" is an impossibility according to Marxist theory. The communist society itself is stateless in theory and thus cannot be 20th century states. However, Marx and Engel's theory includes a transitory state phase known as the [[dictatorship of the proletariat]].{{ref|DictatorProl}} Later, the state will "whither away" and the dictatorship of the proletariat will be replaced by the communist society. The Communist states claimed to be this dictatorship of the proletariat. If they did follow Marxist theory, then the theory failed to work in the real world.


[[Image:Victims of the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Victims of the 1932-33 famine in [[Ukraine]], the [[Holodomor]].]]
One specifically communist critique, however, is the allegation that the "Communist states" of the 20th century grossly violated communist principles, and were therefore only partially communist at best or completely un-communist at worst.


Trotskyites and other [[Leninist]]s explain this by arguing that all Communist states after Lenin's death did not actually adhere to Marxism but rather were perversions heavily influenced by [[Stalinism]].{{ref|Trotsky}} However, it has been argued that it was Lenin who created the repressive institutions that Stalin later used. Lenin had analyzed the [[Paris Commune]] and had concluded that it failed due to "excessive generosity-it should have exterminated its enemies".{{ref|Pipes-exterminated}} His regime summary executed hundreds of thousands of "class enemies", created the [[Cheka]], created the system that later become the [[Gulags]], and was responsible for a policy of food requisitioning during the [[Russian Civil War]] that was partially responsible for a famine causing 3-10 million deaths.{{ref|Pipes-lenin}}{{ref|CivilWar}}{{ref|Famine}}{{ref|Museum}}
Firstly, all communists agree that democracy (the rule of the people) is a key element of both socialism and communism - though they may disagree on the particular form that this democracy should take. The leaders of the Communist states themselves frequently announced their support for democracy, held regular elections and sometimes even gave their countries names such as the "[[German Democratic Republic]]" or the "[[North Korea|Democratic People's Republic of Korea]]". Supporters of Communist states have always argued that those states were democratic. However, critics point out that, in practice, one political party held an absolute monopoly on power, dissent was banned, and the elections usually featured a single candidate and were ripe with fraud (often producing implausible results of 99% in favor of the candidate). Thus, communist critics of Communist states argue that, in practice, these states were not democratic and therefore not communist or socialist.


Some Marxist supporters instead argue that no Communist state was Marxist since no Communist state was democratic. However, Marx and Engels gave few hints regarding how the dictatorship of the proletariat or the later communist society should be implemented. They rejected the concept of [[liberal democracy]], arguing that it could not represent the interest of the proletariat. It is often argued that Marx and Engels supported the claimed [[direct democracy]] of the [[Paris Commune]] as a model.{{ref|MarxDemo}} However, this is disputed{{ref|Commune}} and there were human rights violations even during the few months the Commune existed.{{ref|Catholic}}
A lack of democracy implies a lack of a mandate from the people; as such, communist critics argue that the leadership of Communist states did not represent the interests of the [[working class]], and it should therefore be no wonder that this leadership took actions that directly harmed the workers (for example Mao's [[Great Leap Forward]]). In particular, Communist states banned independent [[labor union]]s, an act seen by many communists (and most others on the [[left-wing politics|political left]]) as an open betrayal of the working class.


:''Marx:'' ...When the workers replace the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie by their revolutionary dictatorship ... to break down the resistance of the bourgeoisie ... the workers invest the state with a revolutionary and transitional form ...
[[Trotskyism|Trotskyists]], in particular, have argued that [[Stalin]] transformed the Soviet Union into a bureaucratic and repressive state, and that all subsequent Communist states ultimately turned out similar because they copied his example ([[Stalinism]]). There are various terms used by Trotskyists to define such states; see [[state capitalism]], [[degenerated workers' state]] and [[deformed workers' state]].
:''Engels:'' ...And the victorious party” (in a revolution) “must maintain its rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionaries. Would the Paris Commune have lasted more than a day if it had not used the authority of the armed people against the bourgeoisie? Cannot we, on the contrary, blame it for having made too little use of that authority?...
:''Engels:'' As, therefore, the state is only a transitional institution which is used in the struggle, in the revolution, to hold down one’s adversaries by force, it is sheer nonsense to talk of a ‘free people’s state’; so long as the proletariat still needs the state, it does not need it in the interests of freedom but in order to hold down its adversaries, and as soon as it becomes possible to speak of freedom the state as such ceases to exist ....


Lenin quoted these{{ref|Terror}} and other{{ref|StateRev}} statements by Marx and Engels as support for using the authoritarian principles of [[vanguard party]] and [[democratic centralism]] during the dictatorship of the proletariat in Communist states. This excluded democracy even in theory outside the ruling Communist party. When the Marxists only gained a minority vote in the democratic [[Russian Constituent Assembly election, 1917]], Lenin dissolved the Constituent Assembly after its first session and overturned the election.{{ref|Pipes-demo}} All the later Communist states became and remained totalitarian as long as the Communists remained in power, justifying this by referring to Lenin's interpretation of Marxism, [[Marxism-Leninism]].{{ref|Courtois-MarxLenin}}
While Trotskyists are [[Leninism|Leninists]], there are other communists who embrace classical [[Marxism]] and reject Leninism entirely, arguing, for example, that the Leninist principle of [[democratic centralism]] was the source of the Soviet Union's slide away from communism.


On the other hand, some democratic states have been ruled by parties calling themselves Communist without becoming totalitarian. One example is [[Moldova]]. Whether these parties and similar parties without power are Marxist is disputed, because, while they aim for a socialist society, they reject Marxist cornerstones like a [[proletarian revolution]] and at least for now accept a market economy.(see [[Eurocommunism]] and [[Communist state#Definition of a Communist state|Definition of a Communist state]])
Finally, it should be noted that many of these communist criticisms draw counter-criticisms from anti-communists, many of whom have attempted to establish a direct link between communist principles and the actions of Communist states. Ultimately, this comes down to a fundamental disagreement between communists and anti-communists as to what those 'communist principles' actually ''are''. A glaring example is the issue of democracy: Communists claim that democracy is an essential part of their principles, while anti-communists claim that it is not.


Another argument is that true communism can only develop as a response to the contradictions of bourgeois capitalism; therefore, the failure of those experiments in communism to date can be attributed to the fact they did not emerge in this manner. The Soviet Union is a case in point - Tsarist Russia was quasi-feudal, not capitalist. So it is argued by that the failure of Soviet socialism to sustain itself is actually an affirmation of Marxist theory. The historian [[Orlando Figes]] has criticized this by pointing out that many different forms of Marxism have been tried in many different societies with varying degree of development.{{ref|Figes-ManyTries}} Examples include Lenin's [[War communism]] and [[New Economic Policy]], [[Stalinism]] and post-Stalinism in the industrialized Central Eastern European nations and the Soviet Union, profit-sharing and decentralized workers' councils under [[Tito]], extreme self-reliance under [[Juche]], and reforms under [[Perestroika]] and [[Glasnost]]. [[Maoism]] is a broad concept that includes episodes such as self-sufficient [[communes]] during the [[Great Leap Forward]], anti-intellectualism during the [[Cultural Revolution]], and the almost [[primitivist]] [[Red Khmer]]s.
In addition to Communism, the names of several other ideologies and political systems have been used by governments or political parties whose policies are widely regarded as being contrary to the basic principles of those ideologies or systems. The [[Democratic Republic of the Congo]] or the [[North Korea|Democratic People's Republic of Korea]] (North Korea), for example, are universally regarded as highly undemocratic. Likewise, the [[Liberal Democratic Party of Russia]] shares virtually nothing with the ideology of [[liberalism]].


===General criticisms===
== Marxist theory ==
[[Eric Hoffer]] has communism as one of the chief examples of the mass movement which offers [[The True Believer]] a glorious, if imaginary, future to compensate for the frustrations of his present. Such movements need people to be willing to sacrifice all for that future, including themselves and others. To do that, they need to devalue the past and present. This is not a criticism of Communist tenets specifically; Hoffer's other chief examples are [[Fascists]], [[Nationalists]], and the founding stages of religions.
See [[Criticisms of socialism]] for a general critique of socialism, including the arguments that the condition of communism is an impractical arrangement, contrary to human nature. The following sections of this article deal with criticisms that are specifically raised against Marxist theory.

[[Arthur Koestler]] describes Marxism as a closed system, like [[Catholicism]] or orthodox [[Freudianism]]. This has three peculiarities: It claims to represent a universal truth, which explains everything, and can cure every ill. It can automatically process and reinterpret all potentially damaging data by methods of [[casuistry]], emotionally appealing and beyond common logic. It invalidates criticism by deducing what the subjective motivation of the critic must be, and by arguing about that.

Marxists respond to such allegations by arguing that they are [[straw man|straw men]] (deliberate misrepresentations of Marxist theory) or [[ad hominem]] attacks. For example, they may hold that Marxism does ''not'', in fact, claim to "explain everything and cure every ill"; that it merely recommends certain political and social policies, just as all other ideologies do. On the issue of the True Believer, Marxists may concede the point that ''some'' "True Believers" exist in their midst, but argue that not ''all'' of them are "True Believers", and that, in any case, the behaviour of individual Marxists says nothing about the validity of Marxism itself.


=== Historical materialism ===
=== Historical materialism ===
[[Historical materialism]] is normally considered one of the intellectual foundations of Marxism. It looks for the causes of developments and changes in human history in economic, technological, and more broadly, material factors, as well as the clashes of material interests among tribes, social classes and nations.
[[Historical materialism]] is normally considered the intellectual basis of Marxism. It looks for the causes of developments and changes in human history in economic, technological, and more broadly, material factors, as well as the clashes of material interests among tribes, social classes and nations. However, it ignores other causes of historical and social change, like biology, genetics, philosophy, art, religion, or other causes that are not "materialist" according to Marxists.


In turn, the philosophy of [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel]] can be considered the basis of Historical materialism. [[Max Stirner]] has argued that this philosophy leads to [[nihilism]] and not to historical materialism.
Critics argue that it ignores other causes of historical and social change, like biology, genetics, philosophy, art, religion, or other causes that are not "materialist" according to Marxists. Some, such as [[Karl Popper]] and others, have also argued that Historical materialism is a [[pseudoscience]] because it is not [[falsifiable]]. Marxists respond that [[social science]]s in general are largely not falsifiable, since it is often difficult or outright impossible to test them via [[experiment]]s (in the way [[hard science]] can be tested).


=== Labor theory of value ===
Based on historical materialism, Marx made numerous predictions. For example, he argued that the workers would become poorer and poorer as the capitalists exploited them more and more; that differences between the members within each class would become smaller and smaller and the classes would thus become more homogeneous; that the skilled workers would be replaced by unskilled workers doing assembly line work; that relations between the working class and the capitalists would get worse and worse; and that the capitalists would become fewer and fewer due to an increasing number of monopolies. (The capitalist economists of his time, such as [[David Ricardo]] and [[John Stuart Mill]], would have agreed with most of these predictions, at least as the most likely forecast of events; although they deduced the [[iron law of wages]] from [[Malthus]]'s forecast of population increasing to the point of subsistence, rather than the [[exploitation]] of the [[capitalist system]].)


Fundamental to Marxist theory is the [[labor theory of value]]. It claims that the value (or, to be more exact, [[use-value]]) of an item is determined by the [[socially necessary labour time]] required to produce it. In other words, the greater the amount of work necessary to produce an object, the greater the value of that object. This implies that value is [[objective]], and that it may not be reflected by the [[price]] of the object in question (since price is determined by [[supply and demand]], and is not linked to the amount of necessary work that must be expended to produce the object). The labor theory of value was first fully stated by [[David Ricardo]], from suggestions by [[Adam Smith]], and later adopted by [[Karl Marx]].
Some of these are debatable, while others have been clearly proven wrong. This is often cited by critics as evidence that historical materialism is a flawed theory. Communists reply with two arguments: The first is that there were a number of major events and trends over the past century and a half which Marx could not have predicted: [[imperialism]], [[World War I]], the rise of [[social democracy]] and [[Keynesianism|Keynesian economics]] in the West (that introduced the concept of [[redistribution of wealth]], thereby narrowing the gap between rich and poor), [[World War II]] and finally the [[Cold War]]. In response, critics maintain that if so many unpredictable events have happened in the past, then an equal number could happen in the future, and therefore historical materialism is not a reliable method of making predictions.


By contrast, most capitalist economists now use the [[subjective theory of value]], which implies that the only value of an object on which different observers can agree is its price on the market (which is based on the subjective utilities of the participants). Critics of communism hold that the qualifier "socially necessary" in the labor theory of value is not well-defined, and conceals a subjective judgment of necessity. Marxists have replied to these criticisms by refining the theory in various ways.
The second communist argument is a specifically [[Leninism|Leninist]] one. Lenin, in his book ''[http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/index.htm Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism]'', argued that capitalism must be viewed as a global phenomenon, and different capitalist countries must not be treated as if they are fully independent entities. Instead, one must look at capitalism worldwide. From this point of view, Lenin goes on to argue that rich, developed capitalist countries "export" their poverty to poorer countries, by turning those countries into colonies (hence 'imperialism') and exploiting them as sources of cheap unskilled labor and resources. Part of the spoils from this exploitation are then shared with the workers from the developed countries, in order to keep their standard of living high and thus avoid revolution at home.


===Tabula Rasa===
The European colonial empires of Lenin's time all dissolved between [[1947]] and [[1998]] in the [[decolonization]] of the world. Communists maintain that economic exploitation of poor countries continues even in the absence of direct political control (see [[globalization]] and [[anti-globalization]]).
[[Image: Conrad Schumann.jpg|thumb|300px|right|[[East German]] border guard [[Conrad Schumann]] leaps into [[West Berlin]]. 35 million people fled from the Communist states.{{ref|Refugees}}]]
Marxism views human nature as completely determined by the environment, a [[Tabula rasa]]. The historian [[Richard Pipes]] describes how this led to a belief in a coming new man without vices, in essence a new superior species (although one caused by the environment, not genetics). Trotsky thought that this new man would be able to control all unconscious processes, including those controlling bodily functions like [[digestion]], and have the intellect of [[Aristotle]]. In order to reach this stage it was necessary and right to completely destroy the existing institutions that had formed the current wretched humans. This will make it possible to dispense with the state. This also explains the little value the Communists placed on the lives and rights of the current humans.{{ref|Pipes-nature}} In reality [[self-interest]] could not be destroyed and the new ruling class, the nomenklatura, quickly replaced the old aristocracy. Periodic attempts to destroy it, such as the [[Cultural Revolution]] during Mao's regime, failed.{{ref|Pipes-nomenklatura}}


=== Labor theory of value ===
===Human rights===
[[Bryan Caplan]] has criticized Marx's rejection of [[human rights]]. Marx:
Fundamental to Marxist theory is the [[labor theory of value]]. It claims that the value (or, to be more exact, [[use-value]]) of an item is determined by the [[socially necessary labour time]] required to produce it. In other words, the greater the amount of work necessary to produce an object, the greater the value of that object. This implies that value is [[objective]], and that it may not be reflected by the [[price]] of the object in question (since price is determined by [[supply and demand]], and is not linked to the amount of necessary work that must be expended to produce the object). The labor theory of value was fully stated by [[David Ricardo]], from suggestions by [[Adam Smith]], and later adopted by [[Karl Marx]]. [[R. H. Tawney]] derives it, through [[John Locke]], from the [[scholastic]] ''justum pretium''.


:"None of the supposed rights of man, therefore, go beyond the egoistic man, man as he is, as a member of civil society; that is, an individual separated from the community, withdrawn into himself, wholly preoccupied with his private interest and acting in accordance with his private caprice"
[[Jevons]] and the classical capitalist economists later abandoned the labor theory for the [[utility|utility theory of value]], which implies that the only value of an object on which different observers can agree is its price on the market (which is based on the subjective utilities of the participants).
:"Liberty is, therefore, the right to do everything which does not harm others... It is a question of the liberty of man regarded as an isolated monad, withdrawn into himself."
:"The right of property, is, therefore, the right to enjoy one's fortunes and dispose of it as he will; without regard for other men and independently of society... It leads every man to see in other men, not the realization, but rather the limitation of his own liberty."
:"[B]ourgeois 'freedom of conscience' is nothing but the toleration of all possible kinds of religious freedom of conscience, and that for its part [socialism] endeavors rather to liberate the conscience from the witchery of religion."
:"political emancipation itself is not human emancipation."


Instead the utopian communist society will lead to "the positive transcendence of private property, or human self-estrangement, and therefore the real appropriation of the human essence by and for man... the complete return of man to himself as a social being..." Caplan argues that this rejection of human rights leads to tyranny and oppression of dissidents.{{ref|Museum2}}
Critics of communism hold that the qualifier "socially necessary" in the labor theory of value is not well-defined, and conceals a subjective judgment of necessity. [[Jacques Barsun]] claims that the unit of the labor theory is itself ill-defined; that the problem of measuring the increased return of the skilled laborer (or of the laborer with advanced equipment) in manual man-hours was never solved.
[[Bertrand Russell]] holds that the labor theory, while a reasonable approximation to an [[agrarian]] society, is neither accurate nor normative for an advanced industrialism, whatever its economic arrangements. According to Russell, the labor theory provides a useful [[polemic]] as an [[ethic]] against a "predatory" group, like moneylenders or capitalists; but it does not indicate any fair proportion between the earnings of two workers at different stands on the same assembly line.


===Historical analysis ===
Marxists have replied to these criticisms by refining the labor theory of value in various ways, for example by measuring the increased return of the skilled laborer according to the amount of labor that was necessary to teach that laborer his new skills. The qualifier "socially necessary" usually refers to the ''minimum'' amount of labor necessary to produce a given result; thus, if labor is wasted (the production process utilizes more labor than necessary), the end product does not gain any additional value.
The Marxist stages of history and the Marxist class analysis have been criticized. The historian [[Robert Conquest]] argues that detailed analyses of many historical periods fails to find support for these theories. Marx himself admitted that his theory could not explain the internal development of the "Asiatic" social system, where most of the world's population lived for thousands of years.{{ref|Conquest-analysis}}


===The behaviour of Marxists===
===Marx's predictions===
Marx made numerous predictions. He thought that the workers would become poorer and poorer as the capitalists exploited them more and more; that differences between the members within each class would become smaller and smaller and the classes would thus become more homogeneous; that the skilled workers would be replaced by unskilled workers doing assembly line work; that relations between the working class and the capitalists would get worse and worse; that the capitalists would become fewer and fewer due to an increasing number of [[monopolies]]; that the capitalist states would become increasingly [[authoritarian]]; and that the proletarian revolution would occur first in the most industrialized nations.
A number of criticisms of Marxism are based on the perceived behaviour of its adherents. [[Arthur Koestler]] describes Marxism as a 'closed system', comparing it to the [[Roman Catholic Church]] or orthodox [[Freudianism]]. In his view, such a 'closed system' has three peculiarities:
*It claims to represent a universal truth, which explains everything, and can cure every ill.
*It can automatically process and reinterpret all potentially damaging data by methods of [[casuistry]], emotionally appealling and beyond common logic: "a kind of [[Alice in Wonderland]] croquet, played with mobile hoops."
*It invalidates criticism by deducing what the subjective motivation of the critic must be, and arguing about that.


Some of these are debatable, while others have been clearly proven wrong. This is often cited by critics as evidence that historical materialism is a flawed theory. Communists reply with two arguments: The first is that there were a number of major events and trends over the past century and a half which Marx could not have predicted: [[imperialism]], [[World War I]], the rise of [[social democracy]] and [[Keynesianism|Keynesian economics]] in the West (that introduced the concept of [[redistribution of wealth]], thereby narrowing the gap between rich and poor), [[World War II]] and finally the [[Cold War]]. In response, critics maintain that if so many unpredictable events have happened in the past, then an equal number could happen in the future, and therefore Marxist theory is not a reliable method of making predictions.
[[Eric Hoffer]] uses Communism as one of the chief examples of the [[mass movement]] which offers [[the True Believer]] (a technical, and pejorative term) a glorious, if imaginary, future to compensate for the frustrations of his present. (This is not a criticism of Communist tenets specifically; Hoffer's other chief examples are [[Fascists]], [[Nationalists]], and the first members of [[religion]]s, such as the early [[Christianity|Christians]]). He further holds that one of the characteristics of the True Believer is his ability to switch from one True Belief to another.) [[Milan Kundera]]'s account of the young Communists of [[Czechoslovakia]] in 1948 tells of a similar Dionysiac enthusiasm.


Lenin noted that the predicted increasing class polarization and communist revolution had failed to occur in the developed world. He then attempted to explain this by stating that [[imperialism]] is the highest stage of capitalism, and that developed countries had created a [[labor aristocracy]] content with capitalism by exploiting the developing world.
Marxists respond to such allegations by arguing that they are [[straw man|straw men]] (deliberate misrepresentations of Marxist theory) or [[ad hominem]] attacks. For example, they may hold that Marxism does ''not'', in fact, claim to "explain everything and cure every ill"; that it merely recommends certain political and social policies, just as all other ideologies do. On the issue of the True Believer, Marxists may concede the point that ''some'' "True Believers" exist in their midst, but argue that not ''all'' of them are "True Believers", and that, in any case, the behaviour of individual Marxists says nothing about the validity of Marxism itself.

After the Western nations voluntarily gave up their colonies, supporters of communism have attempted to explain this with still another stage, sometimes called [[Neocolonialism]], arguing that the [[Third World]] is exploited also without formal empires.{{ref|Neocolonialism}} For criticism of this, see [[Anti-globalization#Criticisms]].

=== Pseudoscience ===
Marxism does not claim be to a [[science]]. However, historical materialism does. [[Karl Popper]] and others have argued that historical materialism is a [[pseudoscience]] because it is not [[falsifiable]]. Marxists respond that some [[social science]]s are not falsifiable, since it is often difficult or outright impossible to test them via [[experiment]]s (in the way [[hard science]] can be tested). This is especially true when many people and a long time is involved. Popper agreed on this, but instead used it as an argument against central [[planning]] and all ideologies that claim to know the future.


== See also ==
== See also ==
*[[Criticisms of socialism]]
*[[Criticisms of socialism]]
*[[The Black Book of Communism]]
*[[Democide#Significant_20th_century_democides|Significant 20th century democides]]
*[[The Great Terror]]
*[[Democide]]


== References and further reading ==
== References and further reading ==
===Anti-communist books===
===References===
#{{note|Refugees}} {{Web reference_author | Author=Rummel, R.J | Title=How many did the Communist regimes murder? | Work=Freedom, Democracy, Peace; Power, Democide, and War | URL=http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM | Date=October 2 | Year=2005}}
*Anne Applebaum, <cite>Gulag: A History</cite>, Broadway Books, 2003, hardcover, 720 pages, ISBN 0767900561
#{{note|Courtois-intro}} Bibliography: Courtois, 1999. Introduction
*Becker, Jasper (1998) ''Hungry Ghosts : Mao's Secret Famine''. Owl Books. ISBN 0805056688.
#{{note|Totals}} {{Web reference | title=Deaths by Mass Unpleasantness: Estimated Totals for the Entire 20th Century | work=Historical Atlas of the 20th Century | URL=http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat8.htm | date=October 2 | year=2005}}
*Conquest, Robert (1991) ''The Great Terror: A Reassessment''. Oxford University Press ISBN 0195071328.
#{{note|Yakovlev-deaths}} Bibliography: Yakovlev, 2004. p. 234
*Conquest, Robert (1987) ''The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine''. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195051807.
#{{note|Yakovlev-children}} Bibliography: Yakovlev, 2004. p. 29-47
*Courtois,Stephane; Werth, Nicolas; Panne, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis & Kramer, Mark (1999). ''The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression''. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674076087.
#{{note|FreeSpeech}} {{Web reference | title= A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 9 - Mass Media and the Arts | work=The Library of Congress. Country Studies | URL=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html| date=October 03 | year=2005}}
*Hamilton-Merritt, Jane (1999) ''Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and the Secret Wars for Laos, 1942-1992'' Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253207568.
#{{note|FreeRelNat}} Bibliography: Yakovlev, 2004. p. 153-169, 181-213.
#{{note|Informants}} {{Book reference | Author=Koehler, John O. | Title=Stasi: The Untold Story of the East German Secret Police| Publisher=Westview Press| Year=2000 | ID=ISBN 0813337445}}
#{{note|Psyche}} {{Web reference | title=The Soviet Case: Prelude to a Global Consensus on Psychiatry and Human Rights| work=Human Rights Watch| URL=http://hrw.org/reports/2002/china02/china0802-02.htm#P397_91143| date=October 3 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Unions}} {{Web reference | title= A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 5. Trade Unions | work=The Library of Congress. Country Studies | URL=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html| date=October 4 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Courtois-terrorism}} Courtois, 1999. Chapter 18
#{{note|Pipes-imperialism}} Bibliography: Pipes, 1994. p. 141-166
#{{note|Pipes-famine}} Bibliography: Pipes, 1994. p. 412-413, 419
#{{note|Conquest-famine}} Bibliography: Conquest, 1986. p. 306
#{{note|Pipes-executions}} Bibliography: Pipes, 2001. p. 66-67
#{{note|Pipes-wwii}} Bibliography: Pipes, 2001. p. 74-76, 96, 103-109
#{{note|SovGDP1}}{{Citepaper_version | Author= Steele, Charles N| Title=The Soviet Experiment: Lessons for Development | PublishYear=2002 | Version= in Morris, J.(ed.), Sustainable Development. Promoting Progress or Perpetuating Poverty? (London, Profile Book| URL=http://ipn.lexi.net/images/uploaded/12-402934626c558--charles_steele_chapter6.pdf}}
#{{note|SovGDP2}}{{Citepaper_version | Author= Brainerd, Elizabeth| Title= Reassessing The standard of living in the Soviet Union: an analysis using archival and anthropometric data| PublishYear=2002 | Version=Abram Bergson Memorial Conference, Harvard University, Davis Center, November 23–24| URL=http://www.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/7/753/papers/brainerd.pdf}}
#{{note|Bumper}} {{Book reference url| Author=Horowitz, David | Title=The Politics of Bad Faith | Publisher =Touchstone Books | Year=2000 | ID=ISBN 0684850230 | URL=http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/Articles/The%20Road%20to%20Nowhere.htm }}
#{{note|ChinaCap}} {{Journal reference url | Author=Wand, Xiaolu, and Lian Meng| Title=A Reevaluation of China's Economic Growth| Journal= China Economic Review| Year=2001 | Volume=12(4) | Pages= 338&ndash;346 | URL=http://apseg.anu.edu.au/staff/pub_highlights/XiaoluW_03.pdf}}
#{{note|VietnamCap}} {{Citepaper_publisher_version | Author=Dollar, David| Title=Reform, growth, and poverty in Vietnam, Volume 1| Publisher=Development Research Group, World Bank
| PublishYear=2002 | Version=: Policy, Research working paper series ; no. WPS 2837| URL=http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&theSitePK=469372&entityID=000094946_02051604452864}}
#{{note|1936}} {{Citepaper_publisher_version | Author=Sleifer, Japp| Title=Separated Unity: The East and West German Industrial Sector in 1936 | Publisher=Groningen Growth and Development Centre| PublishYear=1999 | Version=Research Memorandum GD-46| URL=http://www.ggdc.net/pub/gd46.pdf}}
#{{note|1954}} {{Citepaper_publisher_version | Author=Sleifer, Japp| Title=A Benchmark Comparison of East and West German Industrial Labour Productivity in 1954 | Publisher=Groningen Growth and Development Centre| PublishYear=2002 | Version=Research Memorandum GD-57| URL=http://www.eco.rug.nl/ggdc/pub/gd57.pdf}}
#{{note|1989}} {{Citepaper_publisher_version | Author=Ark, Bart van| Title=Economic Growth and Labour Productivity In Europe: Half a Century of East-West Comparisons | Publisher=Groningen Growth and Development Centre| PublishYear=1999 | Version=Research Memorandum GD-41| URL=http://www.ggdc.net/pub/gd41.pdf}}
#{{note|Transition}} {{Web reference | title= 2004. World Development Indicators 2004 online | work=Development Data Group, The World Bank. From the World Resources Institute| URL=http://earthtrends.wri.org/searchable_db/results.cfm?years=1989-1989,1990-1990,1991-1991,1992-1992,1993-1993,1994-1994,1995-1995,1996-1996,1997-1997,1998-1998,1999-1999,2000-2000,2001-2001,2002-2002,2003-2003&variable_ID=225&theme=5&cID=2,7,11,16,24,28,45,48,59,68,83,95,101,103,108,111,124,125,146,151,152,161,162,177,185,187,192&ccID= | date=October 7 | year=2005}}
#{{note|MoslemWomen}} {{Book reference | Author=Massell, Gregory J. | Title=The Surrogate Proletariat: Moslem Women and Revolutionary Strategies in Soviet Central Asia, 1919-1929 | Publisher= Princeton University Press | Year=1974 | ID=ISBN 069107562X}}
#{{note|FamChina}} Bibliography: Chang, 2005
#{{note|FamNorthKor}} Bibliography: Natsios, 2002
#{{note|Height}} {{Citepaper_publisher_version | Author=Komlos, John, and Peter Kriwy | Title=The Biological Standard of Living in the Two Germanies | Publisher=Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research | PublishYear=2001 | Version=Working Paper Series No. 560| URL=http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=283736}}
#{{note|Happiness}} {{Journal reference url | Author=Frijters, Paul, John P. Haisken-DeNew, and Michael A. Shields | Title=Money Does Matter! Evidence from Increasing Real Income and Life Satisfaction in East Germany Following Reunification| Journal= American Economic Review| Year=2004 | Volume=94 | Pages= 730&ndash;740 | URL=http://www.socialpolitik.de/tagungshps/2004/Papers/Haisken.pdf }}
#{{note|EduHealth}} {{Web reference | title= A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 6 - Education, Health, and Welfare | work=The Library of Congress. Country Studies | URL=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html| date=October 4 | year=2005}}
#{{note|LivingStand}} Horowitz, 2000.
#{{note|LifeExp}} {{Citepaper_publisher_version | Author=Meslé, France| Title=Mortality in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union long-term trends and recent upturns | Publisher=Institut national d’études démographiques, Paris | PublishYear=2002 | Version=Paper presented at IUSSP/MPIDR Workshop "Determinants of Diverging Trends in Mortality" Rostock, June 19-21 2002| URL=http://www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/workshops/020619_paper27.pdf}}
#{{note|Cuba}} {{Web reference | title=Zenith and Eclipse: A Comparative Look at Socio-Economic Conditions in Pre-Castro and Present Day Cuba | work=Released by the Bureau of Inter-American Affairs, February 9, 1998. Revised June 2002 | URL=http://www.state.gov/p/wha/ci/14776.htm | date=October 2 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Courtois-intro2}} Bibliography: Courtois, 1999. Introduction
#{{note|Science}} {{Web reference | title= A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 16. Science and Techology | work=The Library of Congress. Country Studies | URL=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html| date=October 5 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Nobel}} {{Citepaper_publisher | Author=Jank, Wolfgand, Bruce L. Golden, Paul F. Zantek | Title=Old World vs. New World: Evolution of Nobel Prize Shares | Publisher=University of Maryland | PublishYear=2004 | URL=http://www.smith.umd.edu/faculty/wjank/NobelShares.pdf}}
#{{note|Tech}} {{Citepaper_publisher_version | Author=Davis, Christopher | Title=The Defence Sector in the Economy of a Declining Superpower: Soviet Union and Russia, 1965-2000 | Publisher=University of Oxford | PublishYear=2000 | Version=Forthcoming Article in the Journal Defence and Peace Economics Draft (8/6/00)| URL=http://www.econ.ox.ac.uk/Research/WP/PDF/paper008.pdf}}
#{{note|Tech2}} {{Web reference | title= A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 16. Science and Techology | work=The Library of Congress. Country Studies | URL=http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html| date=October 4 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Cocom}} {{Citepaper_publisher | Author=Weiss, Gus W | Title=The Farewell Dossier | Publisher=CIA | PublishYear=1996 | URL=http://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/96unclass/farewell.htm}}
#{{note|Environment}} {{Journal reference url | Author= Díaz-Briquets, Sergio, and Jorge Pérez-López| Title=Socialism and Environmental Disruption: Implications for Cuba | Journal=Proceedings of the Annual Meetings of the Association for the Study of the Cuban Economy | Year=1998 | Volume=8 | Pages= 154&ndash;172 | URL=http://lanic.utexas.edu/la/cb/cuba/asce/cuba8/22diaz.pdf }}
#{{note|Environment2}} Steele, 2002.
#{{note|Unece}} {{Web reference | title=Environmental Performance Reviews Programme | work=United Nations Economic Commission for Europe | URL=http://www.unece.org/env/epr/countriesreviewed.htm | date=October 2 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Unep}} {{Web reference | title=UNEP.Net Country Profiles | work=United Nations Environment Network | URL=http://www.unep.net/profile/index.cfm | date=October 2 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Oecd}} {{Web reference | title=OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Russia | work=OECD| URL=http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/7/50/2452793.pdf | date=October 2 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Air}} {{Citepaper_version | Author=Kahn, Matthew E | Title=Has Communism’s Collapse Greened Eastern Europe’s Polluted Cities?| PublishYear=2002 | Version=Paper written for the NBER Environmental Conference on Advances in Empirical Environmental Policy Research May 17th 2002| URL=http://www.nber.org/~confer/2002/env02/kahn.pdf}}
#{{note|DictatorProl}} {{Web reference | title=Dictatorship of the Proletariat | work=The Encyclopedia of Marxism| URL=http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/d/i.htm#dictatorship-proletariat| date=October 3 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Trotsky}} {{Web reference | title=Trotskyism | work=The Encyclopedia of Marxism| URL=http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/t/r.htm#trotskyism| date=October 6 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Pipes-exterminated}} Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. p. 789-795.
#{{note|Pipes-lenin}} Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. Pipes, 1994. Courtois, 1999. Yakovlev, 2004.
#{{note|CivilWar}} {{Web reference | title=Russian Civil War | work=Historical Atlas of the 20th Century | URL=http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat1.htm#Russian | date=October 2 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Famine}} {{Web reference_simple | title=The Soviet Famines of 1921 and 1932-3 | URL=http://www.overpopulation.com/faq/health/hunger/famine/soviet_famine.html | date=October 02 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Museum}} {{Web reference | title=Lenin and the First Communist Revolutions, VII | work=Museum of Communism| URL=http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/his1g.htm| date=October 2 | year=2005}}
#{{note|MarxDemo}} {{Web reference | title=Democracy | work=The Encyclopedia of Marxism| URL=http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/d/e.htm#democracy| date=October 2 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Commune}} {{Web reference_simple | title=Paris Commune: Myth vs. Reality | URL=http://question-everything.mahost.org/History/ParisCommune.html | date=October 1 | year=2005 }}
#{{note|Catholic}} {{Web reference | title=Martyrs of the Paris Commune | work= The Catholic Encyclopedia | URL=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04168a.htm | date=October 1 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Terror}} {{Citepaper | Author=Lenin, Vladimir | Title=The Proletarian Revolution and the Renegade Kautsky | PublishYear=1918| URL=http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1918/prrk/equality.htm}}
#{{note|StateRev}} {{Citepaper | Author=Lenin, Vladimir | Title=The State and Revolution | PublishYear=1918| URL=http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/}}
#{{note|Pipes-demo}} Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. p. 550-555
#{{note|Courtois-MarxLenin}} Bibliography: Courtois, 1999. Conclusion
#{{note|Figes-ManyTries}} {{Book reference | Author=Figes, Orlando | Title=A People's Tragedy | Publisher =Random House | Year=1996 | ID=ISBN 0224041622 }} p. 823
#{{note|Pipes-nature}} Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. p. 135-138
#{{note|Pipes-nomenklatura}} Bibliography: Pipes, 2001. p. 150-151
#{{note|Museum2}} {{Web reference | title=Museum of Communism FAQ | work=Museum of Communism| URL=http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/comfaq.htm| date=October 7 | year=2005}}
#{{note|Conquest-analysis}} Bibliography: Conquest, 2000. p. 47-51
#{{note|Neocolonialism}} {{Web reference | title=Neocolonialism | work=The Encyclopedia of Marxism| URL=http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/n/e.htm#neocolonialism| date=October 3 | year=2005}}

===Bibliography: Communist human rights violations===
*Applebaum, Anne (2003) ''Gulag: A History''. Broadway Books. ISBN 0767900561
*Chang, Jung &amp; Halliday, Jon (2005) ''[[Mao: The Unknown Story]]''. Knopf. ISBN 0679422714
*Conquest, Robert (1991) ''[[The Great Terror]]: A Reassessment''. Oxford University Press ISBN 0195071328.
*Conquest, Robert (1986) ''The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine''. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195051807.
*Conquest, Robert (2000) ''Reflections on a Ravaged Century''. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0393048187
*Courtois, Stephane; Werth, Nicolas; Panne, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis & Kramer, Mark (1999). ''[[The Black Book of Communism]]: Crimes, Terror, Repression''. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674076087.
*Hamilton-Merritt, Jane (1999) ''Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and the Secret Wars for Laos, 1942-1992'' Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253207568.
*Jackson, Karl D. (1992) ''Cambodia, 1975&ndash;1978'' Princeton University Press ISBN 069102541X.
*Jackson, Karl D. (1992) ''Cambodia, 1975&ndash;1978'' Princeton University Press ISBN 069102541X.
*Kakar, M. Hassan (1997)''Afghanistan: The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979-1982'' University of California Press. ISBN 0520208935.
*Kakar, M. Hassan (1997)'' Afghanistan: The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979-1982'' University of California Press. ISBN 0520208935.
*Khlevniuk, Oleg & Kozlov, Vladimir (2004) ''The History of the Gulag : From Collectivization to the Great Terror (Annals of Communism Series)'' Yale University Pres. ISBN 0300092849.
*Khlevniuk, Oleg & Kozlov, Vladimir (2004) ''The History of the Gulag : From Collectivization to the Great Terror (Annals of Communism Series)'' Yale University Pres. ISBN 0300092849.
*Natsios, Andrew S. (2002) ''The Great North Korean Famine''. Institute of Peace Press. ISBN 1929223331.
*Natsios, Andrew S. (2002) ''The Great North Korean Famine''. Institute of Peace Press. ISBN 1929223331.
*Nghia M. Vo (2004) ''The Bamboo Gulag: Political Imprisonment in Communist Vietnam'' McFarland & Company ISBN 0786417145.
*Nghia M. Vo (2004) ''The Bamboo Gulag: Political Imprisonment in Communist Vietnam'' McFarland & Company. ISBN 0786417145.
*Pipes, Richard (1995) ''Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime''. Vintage. ISBN 0679761845.
*Pipes, Richard (2001) ''Communism'' Weidenfled and Nicoloson. ISBN 0297646885
*Rummel, R.J. (1997). ''Death by Government.'' Transaction Publishers. ISBN 1560009276.
*Pipes, Richard (1994) ''Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime''. Vintage. ISBN 0679761845.
*Pipes, Richard (1990) ''The Russian Revolution 1899-1919''. Collins Harvill. ISBN 0679400745.
*Rummel, R.J. (1996). ''Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917.'' Transaction Publishers ISBN 1560008873.
*Rummel, R.J. (1996). ''Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917.'' Transaction Publishers ISBN 1560008873.
*Rummel, R.J. & Rummel, Rudolph J. (1999). ''Statistics of Democide: Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900.'' Lit Verlag ISBN 3825840107.
*Todorov, Tzvetan & Zaretsky, Robert (1999). ''Voices from the Gulag: Life and Death in Communist Bulgaria''. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0271019611.
*Van Canh, Nyuyen (1985) ''Vietnam Under Communism, 1975-1982.'' Hoover Institution Press. ISBN 0817978526.
*Todorov, Tzvetan & Zaretsky, Robert (1999). ''Voices from the Gulag: Life and Death in Communist Bulgaria''. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0271019611
*Yakovlev, Alexander (2004). ''A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia.'' Yale University Press. ISBN 0300103220.
*Yakovlev, Alexander (2004). ''A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia.'' Yale University Press. ISBN 0300103220.


== External links ==
== External links ==
=== Criticisms of the Communist states and Marxism ===
*Anti-communist links:
====Directories====
**[http://www.cato.org/research/articles/wilkinson-050201.html Capitalism and Human Nature] A Cato institute article, from a Capitalist point of view.
*[http://markhumphrys.com/communism.html Communism]
**[http://english.epochtimes.com/jiuping.asp The Epoch Times | Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party] Chinese and general communism analysis
**[http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/musframe.htm Museum of Communism]
*[http://www.angelfire.com/de/Cerskus/english/saitai.html Crimes of Soviet Communists]
*[http://www.victimsofcommunism.org/media/ The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation Media Center]
**[http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM How many did the Communist regimes murder?]
**[http://www.victimsofcommunism.org/about/ The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation]
**[http://markhumphrys.com/communism.html End Communism now!]


====Articles====
*Communists opposed to the 'communist states':
*[http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/musframe.htm Museum of Communism]
**[http://www.marxists.org/ Marxists Internet Archive]
*[http://english.epochtimes.com/jiuping.asp Chinese and general communism analysis]
***[http://www.marxists.org/history/index.htm History Archive]
***[http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/index.htm Leon Trotsky Internet Archive]
*[http://www.cato.org/research/articles/wilkinson-050201.html Capitalism and Human Nature]
***[http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1936-rev/index.htm The Revolution Betrayed] An analysis of [[Stalinism]], from a [[Trotskyism|Trotskyist communist]] point of view.
**[http://www.rebelion.org/petras/english/040304capitalism.htm Capitalism versus socialism: The great debate revisited]


====Online estimates of Communist democide====
*Support for the 'communist states':
*[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat8.htm Summary of different estimates for total 20th century democide] Note that only some of numbers are totals for the Communist states.
**[http://www.plp.org/books/Stalin/book.html Another view of Stalin]
**[http://www.marx2mao.com/ From Marx to Mao]

*Neutral:
**[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/atrox.htm 30 Worst Atrocities of the 20th Century]
**[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/atrox.htm 30 Worst Atrocities of the 20th Century]
**[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/tyrants.htm Who was the Bloodiest Tyrant of the 20th Century?]
**[http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/tyrants.htm Who was the Bloodiest Tyrant of the 20th Century?]
*[http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM How many did the Communist regimes murder?]
**[http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE4.HTM Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917]
**[http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.TAB1.GIF Table: Communist democide by nation]
**[http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.FIG1.GIF Graph: Communist democide compared to total for world]
**[http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.FIG2.GIF Graph: Communist democide divied into Genocide, Deportations, Massacres, and Camp/Prisons]

=== Support for Marxism ===
====Support for the Communist states====
*[http://www.plp.org/books/Stalin/book.html Another view of Stalin]
*[http://www.marx2mao.com/ From Marx to Mao]

====Marxists opposed to the Communist states====
*[http://www.marxists.org/ Marxists Internet Archive]
**[http://www.marxists.org/history/index.htm History Archive]
**[http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/index.htm Leon Trotsky Internet Archive]
**[http://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/works/1936-rev/index.htm The Revolution Betrayed] An analysis of [[Stalinism]], from a [[Trotskyism|Trotskyist communist]] point of view.
**[http://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1918/russian-revolution/index.htm The Russian Revolution] A critical analysis by [[Rosa Luxemburg]].
*[http://www.rebelion.org/petras/english/040304capitalism.htm Capitalism versus socialism: The great debate revisited]


[[Category:Communism]]
[[Category:Communism]]

Revision as of 18:31, 7 October 2005

Note that communism is a branch of socialism. This article only discusses criticisms that are specific to communism and not other forms of socialism. See criticisms of socialism for a discussion of objections to socialism in general. Note also that communism and related words are written with the uppercase "C" when they refer to a political party of that name, a member of that party, or a government led by such a party.

Criticisms of communism can be divided in two broad categories: One is those concerning themselves with the real-world results of the 20th century Communist states. Such critics include both pro and anti communists. Another is those concerning themselves with Marxism, the claimed political ideology of the Communist states. A central question is the implications of the real-world results of the Communist states for Marxist theory.

Criticisms of 20th century Communist states

Human rights violations

Extensive historical research, especially after the fall of Communism opened the archives of many of the former Communist states, has documented the large scale human rights violations that occurred in these states. Several of the most prominent researchers are former communists who become disillusioned with the Communist system they had powerful positions in, like Alexander Nikolaevich Yakovlev and Dmitri Volkogonov, or after they started their research, like several of the authors of The Black Book of Communism. Robert Conquest, another former communist, was one of the first to document the Great Purge in his book The Great Terror and was vehemently criticized for this by many Western intellectuals. He was vindicated when the achieves were opened. Jung Chang, one of the authors of Mao: The Unknown Story, was a Red Guard in her youth. See the end of the article for an extensive reference list.

Numbers killed by Communist states[2]
Soviet Union 20 million
China 65 million
Vietnam 1 million
North Korea 2 million
Cambodia 2 million
Eastern Europe 1 million
Latin America 150,000
Africa 1.7 million
Afghanistan 1.5 million

The human rights violations were particularly intensive during the regimes of Stalin and Mao, but started immediately after the Russian revolution during the regime of Lenin. Most prominent are deaths due to executions, forced labor camps, genocides of certain ethnic minorities, and mass starvations caused by either government mismanagement or deliberately. The exact number of deaths caused by these regimes is somewhat disputed, but the historical research shows at least tens of millions and several overviews give a number close to one hundred million deaths.[3] Yakovlev, the researcher with the best access to the Soviet achieves, have recently stated that in the Soviet Union alone 20-25 millions were killed for political motives or in prisons and camps. More than 10.5 million died from famine.[4] Some particularly brutal episodes were the Holodomor, the Great Purge, the Great Leap Forward, and The Killing Fields.

Yakovlev is especially critical of the treatment of millions of children of claimed political opponents. Children of former Imperial officers and peasants were held as hostages and sometimes shot during the Russian Civil War. The children of soldiers who surrendered during WWII could be punished. Some children followed their parents to the Gulags, where their mortality rate was especially high. In 1954 there were 884,057 "specially resettled" children under the age of sixteen. Others were placed in special orphanages run by the secret police in order to be reeducated, often losing even their names, and were considered socially dangerous also as adults.[5]

Other criticisms concern lack of freedom of speech[6] and religious and ethnic persecutions.[7] The use of an extensive network of civilian informants, sometimes including family members, created a society where no one could trust other citizens.[8] In some Communist states it was common practice to classify internal critics of the system as having a mental disease, like sluggishly progressing schizophrenia - which was only recognized in Communist states - and incarcerate them in mental hospitals.[9] Workers were not allowed to join free trade unions.[10] Several internal uprisings were suppressed by military force, like the Tambov rebellion, the Kronstadt rebellion, and the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989. Some Communist states directly supported claimed terrorist groups. Examples include the PFLP, the Red Army Fraction, and the Japanese Red Army.[11]

Another criticism is imperialism. Lenin in 1917 declared the unconditional right of self-determination and separation for the national minorities. Despite this, when the Russian Civil War was won he used military force to conquer the newly independent nations Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan.[12] Stalin conquered the Baltic states and created satellite states in Eastern Europe. China conquered Tibet. Soviet forces intervened against anti-Communist uprisings during the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, the Prague Spring, and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

The leaders of the Communist states themselves frequently announced their support for democracy, held regular elections and sometimes even gave their countries names such as the "German Democratic Republic" or the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". Some supporters of the Communist states have argued that those states were democratic. However, critics point out that, in practice, one political party held an absolute monopoly on power, dissent was banned, and the elections usually featured a single candidate and were ripe with fraud (often producing implausible results of 99% in favor of the candidate). Many of the leaders of Communist states cultivated an extensive personality cult. In some cases the leadership of the state became inherited.

The escape valve of last resort from repressive regimes is emigration, but the communist states were notorious for violently preventing and severely punishing attempts to escape. The anti-democratic nature of these regimes is perhaps best revealed by this prevention of even allowing citizens to "vote with their feet". The most famous example is the Berlin Wall.

Comparison with human rights violations in other political systems

Some supporters of communism find this approach simplistic, noting that humans rights violations such as executions, forced labor camps, the repression of ethnic minorities, and mass starvation were patterns in both non-democratic Russian and Chinese history before their respective Communist takeovers, and that later the opposing capitalist states also committed some human rights violations, like state terrorism. However, evils in other regimes can hardly be used to justify new ones. Advocates reply that they only seek to put the events into perspective, not justify them. Also this defense can be criticized. Any attempt similarly to similarly relativize Nazi and fascist crimes would be widely seen as obnoxious. Moreover, Alexander Solzhenitsyn argues in his book Gulag Archipelago that the living conditions and death rates of the inmates in the Soviet era Gulags were much worse than those of the Czarist era Katorgas. The worst crop failure of late Czarist Russia, in 1892, caused 375,000 to 400,000 deaths, while famines under both Lenin and Stalin caused many millions of deaths.[13][14] The Czarist regime executed 3,932 persons for political crimes between 1825 and 1910. 681,692 persons were executed between 1937 and 1938 during the Great Purge.[15]

Another comparison may be to the deaths caused by capitalism during several centuries, a number claimed by some (for example, the French book Le Livre Noir du capitalisme - "The Black Book of capitalism") to be far greater. However, this was achieved by counting the crimes of colonialism or imperialism, where defenders of capitalism would argue that the deaths were caused by anti-capitalism, i.e. by reducing the economic freedom of people. But this defense of capitalism may be similar to the defense of communism that the Communist states were not "real" communist societies. A better comparison may be to liberal democracies. According to the research supporting the democratic peace theory, they have very low levels of systematic violence.

According to the historian Richard Pipes, the Communist states share some responsibility for WWII. Both Hitler and Mussolini used the Soviet Union as a model for their own totalitarian states and Hitler privately expressed that Stalin was a "genius". In turn, Stalin expressed desire for another great war that would leave his enemies weakened. He allowed the testing and production of German weapons that were forbidden by the Versailles Treaty to occur on Soviet territory. During the critical 1932 German elections, he forbid the German Communists from collaborating with the Social Democrats. These parties together gained more votes than Hitler and could have prevented him from becoming Chancellor.[16]

Economic and social development

Advocates of central economic planning claim that it has in certain instances produced dramatic advances, including rapid industrialization of the Soviet Union, especially during the 1930s. Another example is the development of the pharmaceutical industry in Cuba. New research shows that the Soviet figures were largely fabricated, especially those from the Stalin era. Growth was more impressive in 1950s and 1960s but later declined and according to some estimates become negative in the late eighties.[17][18] Before the collectivization, Russia had been the "breadbasket of Europe," supplying 40% of the world’s wheat exports in the bumper years 1909 and 1910. The Soviet Union became a net importer of grain, unable to produce enough food to feed its own population.[19]

China and Vietnam achieved much higher rates of growth after introducing capitalist economic reforms and the higher growth rates was accompanied by declining poverty.[20][21] The Communist states do not compare favorable when looking at divided nations with similar culture before the Communist takeovers: North Korea vs. South Korea; China vs. Hong Kong and Taiwan; and East Germany vs. West Germany. East vs. West German productivity was around 90% in 1936[22] and around 60-65% in 1954.[23] When compared to the EU, the East German productivity declined from 67% in 1950 to 50% before the unification in 1989. All the Eastern European nations had productivity far below the EU average.[24] Unlike the slow transition in China and Vietnam, the abrupt end to central planning was followed by a depression in many of the states of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. As of 2003, all of them have positive economic growth and almost all have a higher GDP/capita than before the transition.[25]

The Communist states used their energy inefficiently, getting much less economic growth from the same amount of energy than the Western nations and the Third World. However, it can be argued that there was little need for energy efficiency since the Soviet Union was a net exporter of oil and gas and China has large coal reserves.

Supporters of the Communist states note the social and cultural programs, sometimes administered by labor organizations. They included in theory guaranteed employment, subsidized food and clothing, free health care, free child care, and free education. Early advances in the status of women were also notable, especially in Islamic areas of the Soviet Union.[26] They point out to the claimed high levels of literacy enjoyed by Eastern Europeans (in comparison, for instance, with Southern Europe), Cubans or Chinese.

However, again the Communist parts of the divided nations do not compare favorably. Millions died in famines in Communist China and North Korea.[27][28] East Germans were shorter than West Germans and this difference increased with time, probably due to differences in factors such as nutrition and medical services.[29] Life satisfaction increased in East Germany after the reunification.[30] The Soviet education system was full of propaganda and of low quality. The Soviet Union spent far less on health care than the Western nations and in the 1970s and 1980s the quality was deteriorating. The pension and welfare programs failed to provide adequate protection.[31]

In the Soviet Union in 1989 there was rationing of meat and sugar. The average intake of red meat for a Soviet citizen was half of what it had been for a subject of the Czar in 1913. Blacks in apartheid South Africa owned more cars per capita. The only area of consumption in which the Soviets excelled was the ingestion of hard liquor. Two-thirds of the households had no hot water, and a third had no running water at all. According to the government paper, Izvestia, a typical working class family of four was forced to live for 8 years in a single 8x8 foot room, before marginally better accommodation became available. The housing shortage was so acute that at all times 17% of Soviet families had to be physically separated for want of adequate space. A third of the hospitals had no running water and the bribery of doctors and nurses to get decent medical attention and even amenities like blankets in Soviet hospitals was not only common, but routine. Only 15 percent of Soviet youth were able to attend institutions of higher learning compared to 34 percent in the U.S. The average welfare mother in the United States received more income in a month, than the average Soviet worker could earn in a year.[32]

After 1965, life expectancy began to plateau or even decreased, especially for males, in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe while it continued to increase in Western Europe. This divergence between two parts of Europe went on during three decades leading to a profound gap in the mid 90s. The life expectancy sharply declined after the change to market economy in several of the states of the former Soviet Union but may now have started to increase in the Baltic states. In several Eastern European nations life expectancy started to increase immediately after the fall of Communism. The previous decline for males continued for a time in some, like Romania, before starting to increase.[33]

Milovan Djilas, once one of the most powerful leaders in Communist Yugoslavia, in his book New Class argued that a new powerful class of party bureaucrats emerged which exploited the rest of the population. In the Soviet Union this group was known as the Nomenklatura.

Cuba is often cited as a successful example by communists. However, Cuba was one of most developed nations in Latin America before Castro. Other Latin American nations have seen greater increases in literacy than Cuba. Calories per person have declined in Cuba while it has increased in most other Latin American nations. Cubans eat less cereals and meat than before Castro.[34] On the other hand, there is a United States embargo against Cuba.

Arts, science, technology, and environment

The Communist states censored the arts, usually only allowing socialist realism. Some Communist states have been involved in the destruction of cultural heritage: the historical center of Bucharest, hundreds of churches in the Soviet Union, and the Cultural Revolution are some examples.[35]

Certain sciences were suppressed. One example is censorship and revisionism of history. Research was suppressed in biology and genetics (see Lysenkoism), linguistics (see Japhetic theory), cybernetics, psychology and psychiatry, and even organic chemistry.(See suppressed research in the Soviet Union) The emphasis on the "hard sciences" produced mixed results.[36] There were very few Nobel Prize winners from Communist states.[37]

Soviet technology in many sectors lagged Western technology. Exceptions include areas like the Soviet space program and military technology where occasionally the Communist technology was more advanced due to a massive concentration of research resources. According to the CIA, much of the technology in the Communist states consisted simply of copies of Western products that had been legally purchased or gained through a massive espionage program. Stricter Western control of the export of technology through COCOM and providing defective technology to Communist agents after the discovery of the Farewell Dossier contributed to the fall of Communism.[38][39][40]

Also pointed out is the environmental disasters. One is the gradual disappearance of the Aral Sea and a similar diminishing of the Caspian Sea because of the diversion of the rivers that fed them. Another the pollution of the Black Sea, the Baltic Sea, and the unique freshwater environment of Lake Baikal. Many of the rivers were polluted; several, like the Vistula and Oder rivers in Poland, were virtually ecologically dead. Over 70% of the surface water in the Soviet Union was polluted. In 1988 only 30% of the sewage in the Soviet Union was treated properly. Established health standards for air pollution was exceeded by ten times or more in 103 cities in the Soviet Union in 1988. The air pollution problem was even more severe in Eastern Europe. It caused a rapid growth in lung cancer, forest die-back, and damage to buildings and cultural heritages. According to official sources, 58 percent of total agricultural land of the former Soviet Union was affected by salinization, erosion, acidity, or waterlogging. Nuclear waste was dumped in the Sea of Japan, the Arctic Ocean, and in locations in the Far East. It was revealed in 1992 that in the city of Moscow there were 636 radioactive toxic waste sites and 1,500 in St. Petersburg.[41][42] The environmental situation has improved in every studied former Communist state.[43][44][45][46]

Socialist criticisms of the Communist states

There were early Marxist critics of the first Communist states, like Mensheviks and Trotskyites. The revisionist Marxists, such as Eduard Bernstein and Karl Kautsky denied the necessity of a revolution. However, most foreign communists and Communist parties at first supported the Communist states and accepted the leadership of the Soviet Union (see Comintern). Criticisms gradually increased, especially after Stalin was denounced in the 1956 speech On the Personality Cult and its Consequences, after the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, and after the fall of Communism in 1989-91.

There were also early criticisms from non-Marxist socialists, like Bertrand Russell and Emma Goldman. Some, like H G Wells, were initially supportive but gradually became more disillusioned as more details were revealed. Members of the Socialist-Revolutionary Party and the fraction the Left Socialist-Revolutionaries sometimes fought the Bolsheviks before and in the Russian Civil War. Fanya Kaplan tried to assassinate Lenin. The anarchists have differed from Marx since Bakunin.

Criticisms of Marxist theory

See criticisms of socialism for a discussion of objections to socialism in general. There are also some specific criticisms of Marxist theory.

Relevance of the Communist states for Marxist theory

Marxist critics of the Communist states argue that the problems in the Communist states cannot be used to criticize Marxist theory and the communist society. One argument is that a "Communist state" is an impossibility according to Marxist theory. The communist society itself is stateless in theory and thus cannot be 20th century states. However, Marx and Engel's theory includes a transitory state phase known as the dictatorship of the proletariat.[47] Later, the state will "whither away" and the dictatorship of the proletariat will be replaced by the communist society. The Communist states claimed to be this dictatorship of the proletariat. If they did follow Marxist theory, then the theory failed to work in the real world.

File:Victims of the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine.jpg
Victims of the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine, the Holodomor.

Trotskyites and other Leninists explain this by arguing that all Communist states after Lenin's death did not actually adhere to Marxism but rather were perversions heavily influenced by Stalinism.[48] However, it has been argued that it was Lenin who created the repressive institutions that Stalin later used. Lenin had analyzed the Paris Commune and had concluded that it failed due to "excessive generosity-it should have exterminated its enemies".[49] His regime summary executed hundreds of thousands of "class enemies", created the Cheka, created the system that later become the Gulags, and was responsible for a policy of food requisitioning during the Russian Civil War that was partially responsible for a famine causing 3-10 million deaths.[50][51][52][53]

Some Marxist supporters instead argue that no Communist state was Marxist since no Communist state was democratic. However, Marx and Engels gave few hints regarding how the dictatorship of the proletariat or the later communist society should be implemented. They rejected the concept of liberal democracy, arguing that it could not represent the interest of the proletariat. It is often argued that Marx and Engels supported the claimed direct democracy of the Paris Commune as a model.[54] However, this is disputed[55] and there were human rights violations even during the few months the Commune existed.[56]

Marx: ...When the workers replace the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie by their revolutionary dictatorship ... to break down the resistance of the bourgeoisie ... the workers invest the state with a revolutionary and transitional form ...
Engels: ...And the victorious party” (in a revolution) “must maintain its rule by means of the terror which its arms inspire in the reactionaries. Would the Paris Commune have lasted more than a day if it had not used the authority of the armed people against the bourgeoisie? Cannot we, on the contrary, blame it for having made too little use of that authority?...
Engels: As, therefore, the state is only a transitional institution which is used in the struggle, in the revolution, to hold down one’s adversaries by force, it is sheer nonsense to talk of a ‘free people’s state’; so long as the proletariat still needs the state, it does not need it in the interests of freedom but in order to hold down its adversaries, and as soon as it becomes possible to speak of freedom the state as such ceases to exist ....

Lenin quoted these[57] and other[58] statements by Marx and Engels as support for using the authoritarian principles of vanguard party and democratic centralism during the dictatorship of the proletariat in Communist states. This excluded democracy even in theory outside the ruling Communist party. When the Marxists only gained a minority vote in the democratic Russian Constituent Assembly election, 1917, Lenin dissolved the Constituent Assembly after its first session and overturned the election.[59] All the later Communist states became and remained totalitarian as long as the Communists remained in power, justifying this by referring to Lenin's interpretation of Marxism, Marxism-Leninism.[60]

On the other hand, some democratic states have been ruled by parties calling themselves Communist without becoming totalitarian. One example is Moldova. Whether these parties and similar parties without power are Marxist is disputed, because, while they aim for a socialist society, they reject Marxist cornerstones like a proletarian revolution and at least for now accept a market economy.(see Eurocommunism and Definition of a Communist state)

Another argument is that true communism can only develop as a response to the contradictions of bourgeois capitalism; therefore, the failure of those experiments in communism to date can be attributed to the fact they did not emerge in this manner. The Soviet Union is a case in point - Tsarist Russia was quasi-feudal, not capitalist. So it is argued by that the failure of Soviet socialism to sustain itself is actually an affirmation of Marxist theory. The historian Orlando Figes has criticized this by pointing out that many different forms of Marxism have been tried in many different societies with varying degree of development.[61] Examples include Lenin's War communism and New Economic Policy, Stalinism and post-Stalinism in the industrialized Central Eastern European nations and the Soviet Union, profit-sharing and decentralized workers' councils under Tito, extreme self-reliance under Juche, and reforms under Perestroika and Glasnost. Maoism is a broad concept that includes episodes such as self-sufficient communes during the Great Leap Forward, anti-intellectualism during the Cultural Revolution, and the almost primitivist Red Khmers.

General criticisms

Eric Hoffer has communism as one of the chief examples of the mass movement which offers The True Believer a glorious, if imaginary, future to compensate for the frustrations of his present. Such movements need people to be willing to sacrifice all for that future, including themselves and others. To do that, they need to devalue the past and present. This is not a criticism of Communist tenets specifically; Hoffer's other chief examples are Fascists, Nationalists, and the founding stages of religions.

Arthur Koestler describes Marxism as a closed system, like Catholicism or orthodox Freudianism. This has three peculiarities: It claims to represent a universal truth, which explains everything, and can cure every ill. It can automatically process and reinterpret all potentially damaging data by methods of casuistry, emotionally appealing and beyond common logic. It invalidates criticism by deducing what the subjective motivation of the critic must be, and by arguing about that.

Marxists respond to such allegations by arguing that they are straw men (deliberate misrepresentations of Marxist theory) or ad hominem attacks. For example, they may hold that Marxism does not, in fact, claim to "explain everything and cure every ill"; that it merely recommends certain political and social policies, just as all other ideologies do. On the issue of the True Believer, Marxists may concede the point that some "True Believers" exist in their midst, but argue that not all of them are "True Believers", and that, in any case, the behaviour of individual Marxists says nothing about the validity of Marxism itself.

Historical materialism

Historical materialism is normally considered the intellectual basis of Marxism. It looks for the causes of developments and changes in human history in economic, technological, and more broadly, material factors, as well as the clashes of material interests among tribes, social classes and nations. However, it ignores other causes of historical and social change, like biology, genetics, philosophy, art, religion, or other causes that are not "materialist" according to Marxists.

In turn, the philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel can be considered the basis of Historical materialism. Max Stirner has argued that this philosophy leads to nihilism and not to historical materialism.

Labor theory of value

Fundamental to Marxist theory is the labor theory of value. It claims that the value (or, to be more exact, use-value) of an item is determined by the socially necessary labour time required to produce it. In other words, the greater the amount of work necessary to produce an object, the greater the value of that object. This implies that value is objective, and that it may not be reflected by the price of the object in question (since price is determined by supply and demand, and is not linked to the amount of necessary work that must be expended to produce the object). The labor theory of value was first fully stated by David Ricardo, from suggestions by Adam Smith, and later adopted by Karl Marx.

By contrast, most capitalist economists now use the subjective theory of value, which implies that the only value of an object on which different observers can agree is its price on the market (which is based on the subjective utilities of the participants). Critics of communism hold that the qualifier "socially necessary" in the labor theory of value is not well-defined, and conceals a subjective judgment of necessity. Marxists have replied to these criticisms by refining the theory in various ways.

Tabula Rasa

File:Conrad Schumann.jpg
East German border guard Conrad Schumann leaps into West Berlin. 35 million people fled from the Communist states.[1]

Marxism views human nature as completely determined by the environment, a Tabula rasa. The historian Richard Pipes describes how this led to a belief in a coming new man without vices, in essence a new superior species (although one caused by the environment, not genetics). Trotsky thought that this new man would be able to control all unconscious processes, including those controlling bodily functions like digestion, and have the intellect of Aristotle. In order to reach this stage it was necessary and right to completely destroy the existing institutions that had formed the current wretched humans. This will make it possible to dispense with the state. This also explains the little value the Communists placed on the lives and rights of the current humans.[62] In reality self-interest could not be destroyed and the new ruling class, the nomenklatura, quickly replaced the old aristocracy. Periodic attempts to destroy it, such as the Cultural Revolution during Mao's regime, failed.[63]

Human rights

Bryan Caplan has criticized Marx's rejection of human rights. Marx:

"None of the supposed rights of man, therefore, go beyond the egoistic man, man as he is, as a member of civil society; that is, an individual separated from the community, withdrawn into himself, wholly preoccupied with his private interest and acting in accordance with his private caprice"
"Liberty is, therefore, the right to do everything which does not harm others... It is a question of the liberty of man regarded as an isolated monad, withdrawn into himself."
"The right of property, is, therefore, the right to enjoy one's fortunes and dispose of it as he will; without regard for other men and independently of society... It leads every man to see in other men, not the realization, but rather the limitation of his own liberty."
"[B]ourgeois 'freedom of conscience' is nothing but the toleration of all possible kinds of religious freedom of conscience, and that for its part [socialism] endeavors rather to liberate the conscience from the witchery of religion."
"political emancipation itself is not human emancipation."

Instead the utopian communist society will lead to "the positive transcendence of private property, or human self-estrangement, and therefore the real appropriation of the human essence by and for man... the complete return of man to himself as a social being..." Caplan argues that this rejection of human rights leads to tyranny and oppression of dissidents.[64]

Historical analysis

The Marxist stages of history and the Marxist class analysis have been criticized. The historian Robert Conquest argues that detailed analyses of many historical periods fails to find support for these theories. Marx himself admitted that his theory could not explain the internal development of the "Asiatic" social system, where most of the world's population lived for thousands of years.[65]

Marx's predictions

Marx made numerous predictions. He thought that the workers would become poorer and poorer as the capitalists exploited them more and more; that differences between the members within each class would become smaller and smaller and the classes would thus become more homogeneous; that the skilled workers would be replaced by unskilled workers doing assembly line work; that relations between the working class and the capitalists would get worse and worse; that the capitalists would become fewer and fewer due to an increasing number of monopolies; that the capitalist states would become increasingly authoritarian; and that the proletarian revolution would occur first in the most industrialized nations.

Some of these are debatable, while others have been clearly proven wrong. This is often cited by critics as evidence that historical materialism is a flawed theory. Communists reply with two arguments: The first is that there were a number of major events and trends over the past century and a half which Marx could not have predicted: imperialism, World War I, the rise of social democracy and Keynesian economics in the West (that introduced the concept of redistribution of wealth, thereby narrowing the gap between rich and poor), World War II and finally the Cold War. In response, critics maintain that if so many unpredictable events have happened in the past, then an equal number could happen in the future, and therefore Marxist theory is not a reliable method of making predictions.

Lenin noted that the predicted increasing class polarization and communist revolution had failed to occur in the developed world. He then attempted to explain this by stating that imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism, and that developed countries had created a labor aristocracy content with capitalism by exploiting the developing world.

After the Western nations voluntarily gave up their colonies, supporters of communism have attempted to explain this with still another stage, sometimes called Neocolonialism, arguing that the Third World is exploited also without formal empires.[66] For criticism of this, see Anti-globalization#Criticisms.

Pseudoscience

Marxism does not claim be to a science. However, historical materialism does. Karl Popper and others have argued that historical materialism is a pseudoscience because it is not falsifiable. Marxists respond that some social sciences are not falsifiable, since it is often difficult or outright impossible to test them via experiments (in the way hard science can be tested). This is especially true when many people and a long time is involved. Popper agreed on this, but instead used it as an argument against central planning and all ideologies that claim to know the future.

See also

References and further reading

References

  1. ^ Template:Web reference author
  2. ^ Bibliography: Courtois, 1999. Introduction
  3. ^ "Deaths by Mass Unpleasantness: Estimated Totals for the Entire 20th Century". Historical Atlas of the 20th Century. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  4. ^ Bibliography: Yakovlev, 2004. p. 234
  5. ^ Bibliography: Yakovlev, 2004. p. 29-47
  6. ^ "A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 9 - Mass Media and the Arts". The Library of Congress. Country Studies. October 03. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  7. ^ Bibliography: Yakovlev, 2004. p. 153-169, 181-213.
  8. ^ . ISBN 0813337445. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Year= ignored (|year= suggested) (help)
  9. ^ "The Soviet Case: Prelude to a Global Consensus on Psychiatry and Human Rights". Human Rights Watch. October 3. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  10. ^ "A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 5. Trade Unions". The Library of Congress. Country Studies. October 4. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  11. ^ Courtois, 1999. Chapter 18
  12. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 1994. p. 141-166
  13. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 1994. p. 412-413, 419
  14. ^ Bibliography: Conquest, 1986. p. 306
  15. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 2001. p. 66-67
  16. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 2001. p. 74-76, 96, 103-109
  17. ^ Template:Citepaper version
  18. ^ Template:Citepaper version
  19. ^ . ISBN 0684850230 http://www.discoverthenetwork.org/Articles/The%20Road%20to%20Nowhere.htm. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Year= ignored (|year= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ Template:Journal reference url
  21. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher version
  22. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher version
  23. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher version
  24. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher version
  25. ^ "2004. World Development Indicators 2004 online". Development Data Group, The World Bank. From the World Resources Institute. October 7. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  26. ^ . ISBN 069107562X. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Year= ignored (|year= suggested) (help)
  27. ^ Bibliography: Chang, 2005
  28. ^ Bibliography: Natsios, 2002
  29. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher version
  30. ^ Template:Journal reference url
  31. ^ "A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 6 - Education, Health, and Welfare". The Library of Congress. Country Studies. October 4. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  32. ^ Horowitz, 2000.
  33. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher version
  34. ^ "Zenith and Eclipse: A Comparative Look at Socio-Economic Conditions in Pre-Castro and Present Day Cuba". Released by the Bureau of Inter-American Affairs, February 9, 1998. Revised June 2002. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  35. ^ Bibliography: Courtois, 1999. Introduction
  36. ^ "A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 16. Science and Techology". The Library of Congress. Country Studies. October 5. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  37. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher
  38. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher version
  39. ^ "A Country Study: Soviet Union (Former). Chapter 16. Science and Techology". The Library of Congress. Country Studies. October 4. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  40. ^ Template:Citepaper publisher
  41. ^ Template:Journal reference url
  42. ^ Steele, 2002.
  43. ^ "Environmental Performance Reviews Programme". United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  44. ^ "UNEP.Net Country Profiles". United Nations Environment Network. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  45. ^ "OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Russia" (PDF). OECD. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  46. ^ Template:Citepaper version
  47. ^ "Dictatorship of the Proletariat". The Encyclopedia of Marxism. October 3. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  48. ^ "Trotskyism". The Encyclopedia of Marxism. October 6. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  49. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. p. 789-795.
  50. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. Pipes, 1994. Courtois, 1999. Yakovlev, 2004.
  51. ^ "Russian Civil War". Historical Atlas of the 20th Century. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  52. ^ Template:Web reference simple
  53. ^ "Lenin and the First Communist Revolutions, VII". Museum of Communism. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  54. ^ "Democracy". The Encyclopedia of Marxism. October 2. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  55. ^ Template:Web reference simple
  56. ^ "Martyrs of the Paris Commune". The Catholic Encyclopedia. October 1. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  57. ^ http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1918/prrk/equality.htm. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |PublishYear= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help)
  58. ^ http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |PublishYear= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help)
  59. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. p. 550-555
  60. ^ Bibliography: Courtois, 1999. Conclusion
  61. ^ . ISBN 0224041622. {{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help); Unknown parameter |Author= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Publisher= ignored (|publisher= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Title= ignored (|title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |Year= ignored (|year= suggested) (help) p. 823
  62. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 1990. p. 135-138
  63. ^ Bibliography: Pipes, 2001. p. 150-151
  64. ^ "Museum of Communism FAQ". Museum of Communism. October 7. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  65. ^ Bibliography: Conquest, 2000. p. 47-51
  66. ^ "Neocolonialism". The Encyclopedia of Marxism. October 3. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= and |year= / |date= mismatch (help)

Bibliography: Communist human rights violations

  • Applebaum, Anne (2003) Gulag: A History. Broadway Books. ISBN 0767900561
  • Chang, Jung & Halliday, Jon (2005) Mao: The Unknown Story. Knopf. ISBN 0679422714
  • Conquest, Robert (1991) The Great Terror: A Reassessment. Oxford University Press ISBN 0195071328.
  • Conquest, Robert (1986) The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195051807.
  • Conquest, Robert (2000) Reflections on a Ravaged Century. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 0393048187
  • Courtois, Stephane; Werth, Nicolas; Panne, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis & Kramer, Mark (1999). The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression. Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674076087.
  • Hamilton-Merritt, Jane (1999) Tragic Mountains: The Hmong, the Americans, and the Secret Wars for Laos, 1942-1992 Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253207568.
  • Jackson, Karl D. (1992) Cambodia, 1975–1978 Princeton University Press ISBN 069102541X.
  • Kakar, M. Hassan (1997) Afghanistan: The Soviet Invasion and the Afghan Response, 1979-1982 University of California Press. ISBN 0520208935.
  • Khlevniuk, Oleg & Kozlov, Vladimir (2004) The History of the Gulag : From Collectivization to the Great Terror (Annals of Communism Series) Yale University Pres. ISBN 0300092849.
  • Natsios, Andrew S. (2002) The Great North Korean Famine. Institute of Peace Press. ISBN 1929223331.
  • Nghia M. Vo (2004) The Bamboo Gulag: Political Imprisonment in Communist Vietnam McFarland & Company. ISBN 0786417145.
  • Pipes, Richard (2001) Communism Weidenfled and Nicoloson. ISBN 0297646885
  • Pipes, Richard (1994) Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime. Vintage. ISBN 0679761845.
  • Pipes, Richard (1990) The Russian Revolution 1899-1919. Collins Harvill. ISBN 0679400745.
  • Rummel, R.J. (1996). Lethal Politics: Soviet Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1917. Transaction Publishers ISBN 1560008873.
  • Todorov, Tzvetan & Zaretsky, Robert (1999). Voices from the Gulag: Life and Death in Communist Bulgaria. Pennsylvania State University Press. ISBN 0271019611.
  • Van Canh, Nyuyen (1985) Vietnam Under Communism, 1975-1982. Hoover Institution Press. ISBN 0817978526.
  • Yakovlev, Alexander (2004). A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia. Yale University Press. ISBN 0300103220.

Criticisms of the Communist states and Marxism

Directories

Articles

Online estimates of Communist democide

Support for Marxism

Support for the Communist states

Marxists opposed to the Communist states