Jump to content

Climate change: Difference between revisions

Edit links
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m Reverted edits by Ignorance is strength (talk) to last version by Thegoodlocust
Here's something for lar. Will revert on request and reasonable explanation on talk page.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Dablink|For past [[climate change]], see [[paleoclimatology]] and [[geologic temperature record]].}}
{{Dablink|For past [[climate change]], see [[paleoclimatology]] and [[geologic temperature record]].}}
{{Dablink|For the dispute regarding the nature, causes, and consequences of global warming, see [[Global warming controversy]]}}
{{Pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}
{{Pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}
{{featured article}}
{{featured article}}

Revision as of 18:41, 2 February 2010

For past climate change, see paleoclimatology and geologic temperature record.
For the dispute regarding the nature, causes, and consequences of global warming, see Global warming controversy

Global mean surface temperature difference relative to the 1961–1990 average
Comparison of ground based (blue) and satellite based (red: UAH; green: RSS) records of temperature variations since 1979. Trends plotted since January 1982.
Mean surface temperature change for the period 2000 to 2009 relative to the average temperatures from 1951 to 1980.[1]

Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of Earth's near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century and its projected continuation. Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) between the start and the end of the 20th century.[2][A] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century was caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation.[2] The IPCC also concludes that variations in natural phenomena such as solar radiation and volcanism had a small cooling effect after 1950.[3][4] These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science,[B] including all of the national academies of science of the major industrialized countries.[5]

Climate model projections summarized in the latest IPCC report indicate that the global surface temperature is likely to rise a further 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) during the 21st century.[2] The uncertainty in this estimate arises from the use of models with differing sensitivity to greenhouse gas concentrations and the use of differing estimates of future greenhouse gas emissions. Most studies focus on the period up to the year 2100. However, warming is expected to continue beyond 2100 even if emissions stop, because of the large heat capacity of the oceans and the long lifetime of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.[6][7]

An increase in global temperature will cause sea levels to rise and will change the amount and pattern of precipitation, probably including expansion of subtropical deserts.[8] Warming is expected to be strongest in the Arctic and would be associated with continuing retreat of glaciers, permafrost and sea ice. Other likely effects include increases in the intensity of extreme weather events, species extinctions, and changes in agricultural yields. Warming and related changes will vary from region to region around the globe, though the nature of these regional variations are uncertain.

Political and public debate continues regarding global warming, and what actions (if any) to take in response. The available options are mitigation to reduce further emissions; adaptation to reduce the damage caused by warming; and, more speculatively, geoengineering to reverse global warming. Most national governments have signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Temperature changes

Main article: Temperature record
Two millennia of mean surface temperatures according to different reconstructions, each smoothed on a decadal scale. The unsmoothed, annual value for 2004 is also plotted for reference.

The most common measure of global warming is the trend in globally averaged temperature near the Earth's surface. Expressed as a linear trend, this temperature rose by 0.74 ± 0.18 °C over the period 1906–2005. The rate of warming over the last half of that period was almost double that for the period as a whole (0.13 ± 0.03 °C per decade, versus 0.07 °C ± 0.02 °C per decade). The urban heat island effect is estimated to account for about 0.002 °C of warming per decade since 1900.[9] Temperatures in the lower troposphere have increased between 0.12 and 0.22 °C (0.22 and 0.4 °F) per decade since 1979, according to satellite temperature measurements. Temperature is believed to have been relatively stable over the one or two thousand years before 1850, with regionally-varying fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period or the Little Ice Age.[10]

Based on estimates by NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2005 was the warmest year since reliable, widespread instrumental measurements became available in the late 1800s, exceeding the previous record set in 1998 by a few hundredths of a degree.[11] Estimates prepared by the World Meteorological Organization and the Climatic Research Unit show 2005 as the second warmest year, behind 1998.[12][13] Temperatures in 1998 were unusually warm because the strongest El Niño in the past century occurred during that year.[14] Global temperature is subject to short-term fluctuations that overlay long term trends and can temporarily mask them. The relative stability in temperature from 1999 to 2009 is consistent with such an episode.[15][16]

Temperature changes vary over the globe. Since 1979, land temperatures have increased about twice as fast as ocean temperatures (0.25 °C per decade against 0.13 °C per decade).[17] Ocean temperatures increase more slowly than land temperatures because of the larger effective heat capacity of the oceans and because the ocean loses more heat by evaporation.[18] The Northern Hemisphere warms faster than the Southern Hemisphere because it has more land and because it has extensive areas of seasonal snow and sea-ice cover subject to ice-albedo feedback. Although more greenhouse gases are emitted in the Northern than Southern Hemisphere this does not contribute to the difference in warming because the major greenhouse gases persist long enough to mix between hemispheres.[19]

The thermal inertia of the oceans and slow responses of other indirect effects mean that climate can take centuries or longer to adjust to changes in forcing. Climate commitment studies indicate that even if greenhouse gases were stabilized at 2000 levels, a further warming of about 0.5 °C (0.9 °F) would still occur.[20]

External forcings

External forcing refers to processes external to the climate system (though not necessarily external to Earth) that influence climate. Climate responds to several types of external forcing, such as radiative forcing due to changes in atmospheric composition (mainly greenhouse gas concentrations), changes in solar luminosity, volcanic eruptions, and variations in Earth's orbit around the Sun.[3] Attribution of recent climate change focuses on the first three types of forcing. Orbital cycles vary slowly over tens of thousands of years and thus are too gradual to have caused the temperature changes observed in the past century.

Greenhouse gases

Main articles: Radiative forcing and Greenhouse effect
Further information: Atmospheric CO2

The greenhouse effect is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by gases in the atmosphere warm a planet's lower atmosphere and surface. It was discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824 and was first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896.[21] Existence of the greenhouse effect as such is not disputed, even by those who do not agree that the recent temperature increase is attributable to human activity. The question is instead how the strength of the greenhouse effect changes when human activity increases the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

Naturally occurring greenhouse gases have a mean warming effect of about 33 °C (59 °F).[22][C] The major greenhouse gases are water vapor, which causes about 36–70 percent of the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO2), which causes 9–26 percent; methane (CH4), which causes 4–9 percent; and ozone (O3), which causes 3–7 percent.[23][24][25] Clouds also affect the radiation balance, but they are composed of liquid water or ice and so are considered separately from water vapor and other gases.

Human activity since the Industrial Revolution has increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to increased radiative forcing from CO2, methane, tropospheric ozone, CFCs and nitrous oxide. The concentrations of CO2 and methane have increased by 36% and 148% respectively since 1750.[26] These levels are much higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been extracted from ice cores.[27][28][29] Less direct geological evidence indicates that CO2 values higher than this were last seen about 20 million years ago.[30] Fossil fuel burning has produced about three-quarters of the increase in CO2 from human activity over the past 20 years. Most of the rest is due to land-use change, particularly deforestation.[31]

CO2 concentrations are continuing to rise due to burning of fossil fuels and land-use change. The future rate of rise will depend on uncertain economic, sociological, technological, and natural developments. Accordingly, the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios gives a wide range of future CO2 scenarios, ranging from 541 to 970 ppm by the year 2100 (an increase by 90-250% since 1750).[32] Fossil fuel reserves are sufficient to reach these levels and continue emissions past 2100 if coal, tar sands or methane clathrates are extensively exploited.[33]

The destruction of stratospheric ozone by chlorofluorocarbons is sometimes mentioned in relation to global warming. Although there are a few areas of linkage, the relationship between the two is not strong. Reduction of stratospheric ozone has a cooling influence, but substantial ozone depletion did not occur until the late 1970s.[34] Ozone in the troposphere (the lowest part of the Earth's atmosphere) does contribute to surface warming.[35]

Aerosols and soot

Ship tracks over the Atlantic Ocean on the east coast of the United States. The climatic impacts from aerosol forcing could have a large effect on climate through the indirect effect.

Global dimming, a gradual reduction in the amount of global direct irradiance at the Earth's surface, has partially counteracted global warming from 1960 to the present.[36] The main cause of this dimming is aerosols produced by volcanoes and pollutants. These aerosols exert a cooling effect by increasing the reflection of incoming sunlight. James E. Hansen and colleagues have proposed that the effects of the products of fossil fuel combustion—CO2 and aerosols—have largely offset one another in recent decades, so that net warming has been driven mainly by non-CO2 greenhouse gases.[37]

In addition to their direct effect by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, aerosols have indirect effects on the radiation budget.[38] Sulfate aerosols act as cloud condensation nuclei and thus lead to clouds that have more and smaller cloud droplets. These clouds reflect solar radiation more efficiently than clouds with fewer and larger droplets.[39] This effect also causes droplets to be of more uniform size, which reduces growth of raindrops and makes the cloud more reflective to incoming sunlight.[40]

Soot may cool or warm, depending on whether it is airborne or deposited. Atmospheric soot aerosols directly absorb solar radiation, which heats the atmosphere and cools the surface. Regionally (but not globally), as much as 50% of surface warming due to greenhouse gases may be masked by atmospheric brown clouds.[41] When deposited, especially on glaciers or on ice in arctic regions, the lower surface albedo can also directly heat the surface.[42] The influences of aerosols, including black carbon, are most pronounced in the tropics and sub-tropics, particularly in Asia, while the effects of greenhouse gases are dominant in the extratropics and southern hemisphere.[43]

Solar variation

Main article: Solar variation
Solar variation over the last thirty years.

Variations in solar output have been the cause of past climate changes,[44] but solar forcing is generally thought to be too small to account for a significant part of global warming in recent decades.[45][46]

Greenhouse gases and solar forcing affect temperatures in different ways. While both increased solar activity and increased greenhouse gases are expected to warm the troposphere, an increase in solar activity should warm the stratosphere while an increase in greenhouse gases should cool the stratosphere.[3] Observations show that temperatures in the stratosphere have been steady or cooling since 1979, when satellite measurements became available. Radiosonde (weather balloon) data from the pre-satellite era show cooling since 1958, though there is greater uncertainty in the early radiosonde record.[47]

A related hypothesis, proposed by Henrik Svensmark, is that magnetic activity of the sun deflects cosmic rays that may influence the generation of cloud condensation nuclei and thereby affect the climate.[48] Other research has found no relation between warming in recent decades and cosmic rays.[49][50] A recent study concluded that the influence of cosmic rays on cloud cover is about a factor of 100 lower than needed to explain the observed changes in clouds or to be a significant contributor to present-day climate change.[51]

Feedback

Main article: Effects of global warming

Feedback is a process in which changing one quantity changes a second quantity, and the change in the second quantity in turn changes the first. Positive feedback amplifies the change in the first quantity while negative feedback reduces it. Feedback is important in the study of global warming because it may amplify or diminish the effect of a particular process. The main positive feedback in global warming is the tendency of warming to increase the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere, which in turn leads to further warming. The main negative feedback is the increase in radiative heat with increasing absolute temperature according to the Stefan–Boltzmann law.

Water vapor feedback
If the atmosphere is warmed, the saturation vapor pressure increases, and the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere will tend to increase. Since water vapor is a greenhouse gas, the increase in water vapor content makes the atmosphere warm further; this warming causes the atmosphere to hold still more water vapor (a positive feedback), and so on until other processes stop the feedback loop. The result is a much larger greenhouse effect than that due to CO2 alone. Although this feedback process causes an increase in the absolute moisture content of the air, the relative humidity stays nearly constant or even decreases slightly because the air is warmer.[52]
Cloud feedback
Warming is expected to change the distribution and type of clouds. Seen from below, clouds emit infrared radiation back to the surface, and so exert a warming effect; seen from above, clouds reflect sunlight and emit infrared radiation to space, and so exert a cooling effect. Whether the net effect is warming or cooling depends on details such as the type and altitude of the cloud. These details were poorly observed before the advent of satellite data and are difficult to represent in climate models.[52]
Lapse rate
The atmosphere's temperature decreases with height in the troposphere. Since emission of infrared radiation varies with temperature, longwave radiation escaping to space from the relatively cold upper atmosphere is less than that emitted toward the ground from the lower atmosphere. Thus, the strength of the greenhouse effect depends on the atmosphere's rate of temperature decrease with height. Both theory and climate models indicate that global warming will reduce the rate of temperature decrease with height, producing a negative lapse rate feedback that weakens the greenhouse effect. Measurements of the rate of temperature change with height are very sensitive to small errors in observations, making it difficult to establish whether the models agree with observations.[53]
Ice-albedo feedback
Aerial photograph showing a section of sea ice. The lighter blue areas are melt ponds and the darkest areas are open water, both have a lower albedo than the white sea ice. The melting ice contributes to ice-albedo feedback.
When ice melts, land or open water takes its place. Both land and open water are on average less reflective than ice and thus absorb more solar radiation. This causes more warming, which in turn causes more melting, and this cycle continues.[54]
Arctic methane release
Warming is also the triggering variable for the release of methane in the arctic.[55] Methane released from thawing permafrost such as the frozen peat bogs in Siberia, and from methane clathrate on the sea floor, creates a positive feedback.[56]
Reduced absorption of CO2 by the oceanic ecosystems
Ocean ecosystems' ability to sequester carbon is expected to decline as the oceans warm. This is because warming reduces the nutrient levels of the mesopelagic zone (about 200 to 1000 m deep), which limits the growth of diatoms in favor of smaller phytoplankton that are poorer biological pumps of carbon.[57]
CO2 release from oceans
Cooler water can absorb more CO2 than warmer water. As ocean temperatures rise some of this CO2 will be released. This is one of the main reasons why atmospheric CO2 is lower during an ice age and higher in warmer periods. There is a greater mass of CO2 contained in the oceans than there is in the atmosphere.
Gas release
Release of gases of biological origin may be affected by global warming, but research into such effects is at an early stage. Some of these gases, such as nitrous oxide released from peat, directly affect climate.[58] Others, such as dimethyl sulfide released from oceans, have indirect effects.[59]

Climate models

Main article: Global climate model

The main tools for projecting future climate changes are mathematical models based on physical principles including fluid dynamics, thermodynamics and radiative transfer. Although they attempt to include as many processes as possible, simplifications of the actual climate system are inevitable because of the constraints of available computer power and limitations in knowledge of the climate system. All modern climate models are in fact combinations of models for different parts of the Earth. These include an atmospheric model for air movement, temperature, clouds, and other atmospheric properties; an ocean model that predicts temperature, salt content, and circulation of ocean waters; models for ice cover on land and sea; and a model of heat and moisture transfer from soil and vegetation to the atmosphere. Some models also include treatments of chemical and biological processes.[60] Warming due to increasing levels of greenhouse gases is not an assumption of the models; rather, it is an end result from the interaction of greenhouse gases with radiative transfer and other physical processes in the models.[61] Although much of the variation in model outcomes depends on the greenhouse gas emissions used as inputs, the temperature effect of a specific greenhouse gas concentration (climate sensitivity) varies depending on the model used. The representation of clouds is one of the main sources of uncertainty in present-generation models.[62]

Global climate model projections of future climate most often have used estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). In addition to human-caused emissions, some models also include a simulation of the carbon cycle; this generally shows a positive feedback, though this response is uncertain. Some observational studies also show a positive feedback.[63][64][65] Including uncertainties in future greenhouse gas concentrations and climate sensitivity, the IPCC anticipates a warming of 1.1 °C to 6.4 °C (2.0 °F to 11.5 °F) by the end of the 21st century, relative to 1980–1999.[2]

Models are also used to help investigate the causes of recent climate change by comparing the observed changes to those that the models project from various natural and human-derived causes. Although these models do not unambiguously attribute the warming that occurred from approximately 1910 to 1945 to either natural variation or human effects, they do indicate that the warming since 1970 is dominated by man-made greenhouse gas emissions.[3]

The physical realism of models is tested by examining their ability to simulate current or past climates.[66] Current climate models produce a good match to observations of global temperature changes over the last century, but do not simulate all aspects of climate.[31] Not all effects of global warming are accurately predicted by the climate models used by the IPCC. For example, observed Arctic shrinkage has been faster than that predicted.[67]

Attributed and expected effects

Environmental

Main articles: Effects of global warming and Regional effects of global warming
Sparse records indicate that glaciers have been retreating since the early 1800s. In the 1950s measurements began that allow the monitoring of glacial mass balance, reported to the WGMS and the NSIDC.

It is usually impossible to connect specific weather events to global warming. Instead, global warming is expected to cause changes in the overall distribution and intensity of events, such as changes to the frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation. Broader effects are expected to include glacial retreat, Arctic shrinkage including long-term shrinkage of Greenland ice sheet[68], and worldwide sea level rise. Some effects on both the natural environment and human life are, at least in part, already being attributed to global warming. A 2001 report by the IPCC suggests that glacier retreat, ice shelf disruption such as that of the Larsen Ice Shelf, sea level rise, changes in rainfall patterns, and increased intensity and frequency of extreme weather events are attributable in part to global warming.[69] Other expected effects include water scarcity in some regions and increased precipitation in others, changes in mountain snowpack, and some adverse health effects from warmer temperatures.[70]

Social and economic effects of global warming may be exacerbated by growing population densities in affected areas. Temperate regions are projected to experience some benefits, such as fewer cold-related deaths.[71] A summary of probable effects and recent understanding can be found in the report made for the IPCC Third Assessment Report by Working Group II.[69] The newer IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summary reports that there is observational evidence for an increase in intense tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic Ocean since about 1970, in correlation with the increase in sea surface temperature (see Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation), but that the detection of long-term trends is complicated by the quality of records prior to routine satellite observations. The summary also states that there is no clear trend in the annual worldwide number of tropical cyclones.[2]

Additional anticipated effects include sea level rise of 0.18 to 0.59 meters (0.59 to 1.9 ft) in 2090–2100 relative to 1980–1999,[2] new trade routes resulting from arctic shrinkage,[72] possible thermohaline circulation slowing, increasingly intense, in some locations, (but less frequent) hurricanes [73]and extreme weather events,[74] reductions in the ozone layer, changes in agriculture yields, changes in the range of climate-dependent disease vectors,[75] which have been linked to increases in the prevalence of malaria and dengue fever,[76] and ocean oxygen depletion.[77] Increased atmospheric CO2 increases the amount of CO2 dissolved in the oceans.[78] CO2 dissolved in the ocean reacts with water to form carbonic acid, resulting in ocean acidification. Ocean surface pH is estimated to have decreased from 8.25 near the beginning of the industrial era to 8.14 by 2004,[79] and is projected to decrease by a further 0.14 to 0.5 units by 2100 as the ocean absorbs more CO2.[2][80] Heat and carbon dioxide trapped in the oceans may still take hundreds of years to be re-emitted, even after greenhouse gas emissions are eventually reduced.[7] Since organisms and ecosystems are adapted to a narrow range of pH, this raises extinction concerns and disruptions in food webs.[81] One study predicts 18% to 35% of a sample of 1,103 animal and plant species would be extinct by 2050, based on future climate projections.[82] However, few mechanistic studies have documented extinctions due to recent climate change,[83] and one study suggests that projected rates of extinction are uncertain.[84]

Economic

Main articles: Economics of global warming and Low-carbon economy
File:IPCC AR4 WGIII GHG concentration stabilization levels.png
Projected temperature increase for a range of stabilization scenarios (the colored bands). The black line in middle of the shaded area indicates 'best estimates'; the red and the blue lines the likely limits. From IPCC AR4.

The IPCC reports the aggregate net economic costs of damages from climate change globally (discounted to the specified year). In 2005, the average social cost of carbon from 100 peer-reviewed estimates is US$12 per tonne of CO2, but range -$3 to $95/tCO2. The IPCC report gives these cost estimates with the caveats, "Aggregate estimates of costs mask significant differences in impacts across sectors, regions and populations and very likely underestimate damage costs because they cannot include many non-quantifiable impacts."[85]

One widely publicized report on potential economic impact is the Stern Review, written by Sir Nicholas Stern. It suggests that extreme weather might reduce global gross domestic product by up to one percent, and that in a worst-case scenario global per capita consumption could fall by the equivalent of 20 percent.[86] The response to the Stern Review was mixed. The Review's methodology, advocacy and conclusions were criticized by several economists, including Richard Tol, Gary Yohe,[87] Robert Mendelsohn[88] and William Nordhaus.[89] Economists that have generally supported the Review include Terry Barker,[90] William Cline,[91] and Frank Ackerman.[92] According to Barker, the costs of mitigating climate change are 'insignificant' relative to the risks of unmitigated climate change.[93]

According to United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), economic sectors likely to face difficulties related to climate change include banks, agriculture, transport and others.[94] Developing countries dependent upon agriculture will be particularly harmed by global warming.[95]

Responses to global warming

The broad agreement among climate scientists that global temperatures will continue to increase has led some nations, states, corporations and individuals to implement responses. These responses to global warming can be divided into mitigation of the causes and effects of global warming, adaptation to the changing global environment, and geoengineering to reverse global warming.

Mitigation

Main article: Mitigation of global warming
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an approach to mitigation. Emissions may be sequestered from fossil fuel power plants, or removed during processing in hydrogen production. When used on plants, it is known as bio-energy with carbon capture and storage.

The IPCC's Working Group III is responsible for crafting reports on mitigation of global warming and the costs and benefits of different approaches. The 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report concludes that no one technology or sector can be completely responsible for mitigating future warming. They find there are key practices and technologies in various sectors, such as energy supply, transportation, industry, and agriculture that should be implemented to reduced global emissions. They estimate that stabilization of carbon dioxide equivalent between 445 and 710 ppm by 2030 will result in between a 0.6 percent increase and three percent decrease in global gross domestic product.[96]

Mitigation of global warming is accomplished through reductions in the rate of anthropogenic greenhouse gas release. The world's primary international agreement on reducing greenhouse gas emissions, the Kyoto Protocol, now covers more than 160 countries and over 55 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.[97] As of June 2009, only the United States, historically the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, has refused to ratify the treaty. The treaty expires in 2012. International talks began in May 2007 on a future treaty to succeed the current one.[98] The 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference met in Copenhagen in December 2009 to agree on a framework for climate change mitigation.[99] No binding agreement was made.

There has also been business action on climate change, including efforts to improve energy efficiency and limited moves towards use of alternative fuels. In January 2005 the European Union introduced its European Union Emission Trading Scheme, through which companies in conjunction with government agree to cap their emissions or to purchase credits from those below their allowances. Australia announced its Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme in 2008. United States President Barack Obama has announced plans to introduce an economy-wide cap and trade scheme.[100]

Adaptation

Main article: Adaptation to global warming

A wide variety of measures have been suggested for adaptation to global warming, from the installation of air-conditioning equipment, to major infrastructure projects, such as abandoning settlements threatened by sea level rise.

Measures including water conservation,[101] water rationing, adaptive agricultural practices,[102] construction of flood defenses,[103] changes to medical care,[104] and interventions to protect threatened species[105] have all been suggested. A wide-ranging study of the possible opportunities for adaptation of infrastructure has been published by the Institute of Mechanical Engineers.[106]

Geoengineering

Main article: Geoengineering

Geoengineering is the concept of planetary engineering applied to Earth: The deliberate modification of Earth's natural environment on a large scale to suit human needs.[107] An example is greenhouse gas remediation, which removes greenhouse gases from the atmosphere, usually through carbon sequestration techniques such as carbon dioxide air capture.[108] Solar radiation management reduces absorbed solar radiation, such as by the addition of stratospheric sulfur aerosols[109] or cool roof techniques.[110] No geoengineering projects of significant scale have been implemented, and detailed study has largely been the work of small numbers of scientists; but various significant institutions such as the Royal Society and IMechE have recently suggested that further study is warranted. Their various externalities and other costs are seen as major issues, and the idea or concern that one country could act unilaterally has also been raised.[111][112][113]

Debate and skepticism

Main articles: Global warming controversy and Politics of global warming
See also: Scientific opinion on climate change, Climate change consensus, and Climate change denial

Increased publicity of the scientific findings surrounding global warming has resulted in political and economic debate.[114] Poor regions, particularly Africa, appear at greatest risk from the projected effects of global warming, while their emissions have been small compared to the developed world.[115] The exemption of developing countries from Kyoto Protocol restrictions has been used to justify non-ratification by the U.S. and a previous Australian Government.[116] (Australia has since ratified the Kyoto protocol.)[117] Another point of contention is the degree to which emerging economies such as India and China should be expected to constrain their emissions.[118] The U.S. contends that if it must bear the cost of reducing emissions, then China should do the same[119][120] since China's gross national CO2 emissions now exceed those of the U.S.[121][122][123] China has contended that it is less obligated to reduce emissions since its per capita responsibility and per capita emissions are less that of the U.S.[124] India, also exempt, has made similar contentions.[125]

In 2007–2008 Gallup Polls surveyed 127 countries. Over a third of the world's population was unaware of global warming, with developing countries less aware than developed, and Africa the least aware. Of those aware, Latin America leads in belief that temperature changes are a result of human activities while Africa, parts of Asia and the Middle East, and a few countries from the Former Soviet Union lead in the opposite belief.[126] In the Western world, opinions over the concept and the appropriate responses are divided. Nick Pidgeon of Cardiff University finds that "results show the different stages of engagement about global warming on each side of the Atlantic"; where Europe debates the appropriate responses while the United States debates whether climate change is happening.[127]

Debates weigh the benefits of limiting industrial emissions of greenhouse gases against the costs that such changes would entail.[96] Using economic incentives, alternative and renewable energy have been promoted to reduce emissions while building infrastructure.[128][129] Business-centered organizations such as the Competitive Enterprise Institute, conservative commentators, and companies such as ExxonMobil have downplayed IPCC climate change scenarios, funded scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus, and provided their own projections of the economic cost of stricter controls.[130][131][132][133] Environmental organizations and public figures have emphasized changes in the current climate and the risks they entail, while promoting adaptation to changes in infrastructural needs and emissions reductions.[134] Some fossil fuel companies have scaled back their efforts in recent years,[135] or called for policies to reduce global warming.[136] Many studies link population growth with emissions and the effect of climate change.[137][138][139]

Some global warming skeptics in the science or political communities dispute all or some of the global warming scientific consensus, questioning whether global warming is actually occurring, whether human activity has contributed significantly to the warming, and the magnitude of the threat posed by global warming. Prominent global warming skeptics include Richard Lindzen, Fred Singer and Patrick Michaels. [citation needed]

See also

Notes

  1. ^
    Increase is for years 1905 to 2005. Global surface temperature is defined in the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report as the average of near-surface air temperature over land and sea surface temperature. These error bounds are constructed with a 90% confidence interval.
  2. ^
    The 2001 joint statement was signed by the national academies of science of Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, the Caribbean, the People's Republic of China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Malaysia, New Zealand, Sweden, and the UK. The 2005 statement added Japan, Russia, and the U.S. The 2007 statement added Mexico and South Africa. The Network of African Science Academies, and the Polish Academy of Sciences have issued separate statements. Professional scientific societies include American Astronomical Society, American Chemical Society, American Geophysical Union, American Institute of Physics, American Meteorological Society, American Physical Society, American Quaternary Association, Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, European Academy of Sciences and Arts, European Geosciences Union, European Science Foundation, Geological Society of America, Geological Society of Australia, Geological Society of London-Stratigraphy Commission, InterAcademy Council, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, International Union for Quaternary Research, National Association of Geoscience Teachers, National Research Council (US), Royal Meteorological Society, and World Meteorological Organization.
  3. ^
    Note that the greenhouse effect produces an average worldwide temperature increase of about 33 °C (59 °F) compared to black body predictions without the greenhouse effect, not an average surface temperature of 33 °C (91 °F). The average worldwide surface temperature is about 14 °C (57 °F).

References

  1. ^ 2009 Ends Warmest Decade on Record. NASA Earth Observatory Image of the Day, January 22, 2010.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g IPCC (2007-05-04). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Retrieved 2009-07-03.
  3. ^ a b c d Hegerl, Gabriele C. (2007). "Understanding and Attributing Climate Change" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Recent estimates indicate a relatively small combined effect of natural forcings on the global mean temperature evolution of the second half of the 20th century, with a small net cooling from the combined effects of solar and volcanic forcings. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Ammann, Caspar (2007). "Solar influence on climate during the past millennium: Results from transient simulations with the NCAR Climate Simulation Model" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (10): 3713–3718. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605064103. PMC 1810336. PMID 17360418. Simulations with only natural forcing components included yield an early 20th century peak warming of ≈0.2 °C (≈1950 AD), which is reduced to about half by the end of the century because of increased volcanism {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Royal Society (2005). "Joint science academies' statement: Global response to climate change". Retrieved 19 April 2009.
  6. ^ Archer, David (2005). "Fate of fossil fuel CO
    2     in geologic time"     (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 110 (C9): C09S05.1–C09S05.6. doi:10.1029/2004JC002625.
  7. ^ a b Solomon, S; Plattner, GK; Knutti, R; Friedlingstein, P (2009). "Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (6): 1704–1709. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812721106. PMC 2632717. PMID 19179281. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |author= and |last1= specified (help); More than one of |number= and |issue= specified (help)
  8. ^ Lu, Jian (2007). "Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters. 34: L06805. doi:10.1029/2006GL028443. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |xauthorlink= ignored (help)
  9. ^ Trenberth, Kevin E. (2007). "Chapter 3: Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change". IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (PDF). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. p. 244. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ [1]
  11. ^ Hansen, James E. (2006-01-12). "Goddard Institute for Space Studies, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis". NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. Retrieved 2007-01-17. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ "Global Temperature for 2005: second warmest year on record" (PDF). Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia. 2005-12-15. Retrieved 2007-04-13.
  13. ^ "WMO statement on the status of the global climate in 2005" (PDF). World Meteorological Organization. 2005-12-15. Retrieved 2009-04-24.
  14. ^ Changnon, Stanley A. (2000). El Niño, 1997–1998: The Climate Event of the Century. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0195135520. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  15. ^ Knight, J.; Kenney, J.J.; Folland, C.; Harris, G.; Jones, G.S.; Palmer, M.; Parker, D.; Scaife, A.; Stott, P. (August 2009). "Do Global Temperature Trends Over the Last Decade Falsify Climate Predictions? [in "State of the Climate in 2008"]" (PDF). Bull.Amer.Meteor.Soc. 90 (8): S75–S79. Retrieved 2009-09-08.
  16. ^ Global temperature slowdown — not an end to climate change. UK Met Office. Retrieved 2009-09-08.
  17. ^ "IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Chapter 3" (PDF). 2007-02-05. p. 237. Retrieved 2009-03-14.
  18. ^ Rowan T. Sutton, Buwen Dong, Jonathan M. Gregory (2007). "Land/sea warming ratio in response to climate change: IPCC AR4 model results and comparison with observations". Geophysical Research Letters. 34: L02701. doi:10.1029/2006GL028164. Retrieved 2007-09-19.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. ^ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). "Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. {{cite book}}: External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ Meehl, Gerald A. (2005-03-18). "How Much More Global Warming and Sea Level Rise" (PDF). Science. 307 (5716): 1769–1772. doi:10.1126/science.1106663. PMID 15774757. Retrieved 2007-02-11. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  21. ^ Weart, Spencer (2008). "The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect". The Discovery of Global Warming. American Institute of Physics. Retrieved 21 April 2009.
  22. ^ IPCC (2007). "Chapter 1: Historical Overview of Climate Change Science" (PDF). IPCC WG1 AR4 Report. IPCC. pp. p97 (PDF page 5 of 36). Retrieved 21 April 2009. To emit 240 W m–2, a surface would have to have a temperature of around −19 °C. This is much colder than the conditions that actually exist at the Earth's surface (the global mean surface temperature is about 14 °C). Instead, the necessary −19 °C is found at an altitude about 5 km above the surface. {{cite web}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  23. ^ Kiehl, J.T.; Trenberth, K.E. (1997). "Earth's Annual Global Mean Energy Budget" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 78 (2): 197–208. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0197:EAGMEB>2.0.CO;2. Retrieved 21 April 2009.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  24. ^ Schmidt, Gavin (6 Apr 2005). "Water vapour: feedback or forcing?". RealClimate. Retrieved 21 April 2009.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: year (link)
  25. ^ Russell, Randy (May 16, 2007). "The Greenhouse Effect & Greenhouse Gases". University Corporation for Atmospheric Research Windows to the Universe. Retrieved Dec 27, 2009.
  26. ^ EPA (2008). "Recent Climate Change: Atmosphere Changes". Climate Change Science Program. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 21 April 2009. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  27. ^ Spahni, Renato (2005). "Atmospheric Methane and Nitrous Oxide of the Late Pleistocene from Antarctic Ice Cores". Science. 310 (5752): 1317–1321. doi:10.1126/science.1120132. PMID 16311333. Retrieved 27 December 2009. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  28. ^ Siegenthaler, Urs (2005). "Stable Carbon Cycle–Climate Relationship During the Late Pleistocene" (PDF). Science. 310 (5752): 1313–1317. doi:10.1126/science.1120130. PMID 16311332. Retrieved 27 December 2009. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  29. ^ Petit, J. R. (3 June 1999). "Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica" (PDF). Nature. 399 (6735): 429–436. doi:10.1038/20859. Retrieved 27 December 2009. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  30. ^ Pearson, PN; Palmer, MR (2000). "Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years". Nature. 406 (6797): 695–699. doi:10.1038/35021000. PMID 10963587. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |author= and |last1= specified (help)
  31. ^ a b IPCC (2001). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved 21 April 2009.
  32. ^ Prentice, I.C.; et al. (2001). "The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: SRES scenarios and their implications for future CO2 concentration". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved 21 April 2009. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  33. ^ Nakicenovic., N.; et al. (2001). "An Overview of Scenarios: Resource Availability". IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. IPCC. Retrieved 21 April 2009. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  34. ^ Sparling, Brien (May 30, 2001). "Ozone Depletion, History and politics". NASA. Retrieved 2009-02-15.
  35. ^ Shindell, Drew; Faluvegi, Greg; Lacis, Andrew; Hansen, James; Ruedy, Reto; Aguilar, Elliot (2006). "Role of tropospheric ozone increases in 20th-century climate change". Journal of Geophysical Research. 111: D08302. doi:10.1029/2005JD006348.
  36. ^ Mitchell, J.F.B.; et al. (2001). "Detection of Climate Change and Attribution of Causes: Space-time studies". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved 21 April 2009. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  37. ^ Hansen, J; Sato, M; Ruedy, R; Lacis, A; Oinas, V (2000). "Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (18): 9875–80. doi:10.1073/pnas.170278997. PMC 27611. PMID 10944197. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |author= and |last1= specified (help)
  38. ^ Lohmann, U. & J. Feichter (2005). "Global indirect aerosol effects: a review". Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5: 715–737.
  39. ^ Twomey, S. (1977). "Influence of pollution on shortwave albedo of clouds". J. Atmos. Sci. 34: 1149–1152. doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1149:TIOPOT>2.0.CO;2.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  40. ^ Albrecht, B. (1989). "Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness". Science. 245 (4923): 1227–1239. doi:10.1126/science.245.4923.1227. PMID 17747885.
  41. ^ Ramanathan, V.; Chung, C; Kim, D; Bettge, T; Buja, L; Kiehl, JT; Washington, WM; Fu, Q; Sikka, DR (2005). "Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102 (15): 5326–5333. doi:10.1073/pnas.0500656102. PMC 552786. PMID 15749818. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |first1= and |first= specified (help); More than one of |last1= and |last= specified (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  42. ^ Ramanathan, V.; et al. (2008). "Report Summary" (PDF). Atmospheric Brown Clouds: Regional Assessment Report with Focus on Asia. United Nations Environment Programme. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  43. ^ Ramanathan, V.; et al. (2008). "Part III: Global and Future Implications" (PDF). Atmospheric Brown Clouds: Regional Assessment Report with Focus on Asia. United Nations Environment Programme. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  44. ^ National Research Council (1994). Solar Influences On Global Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. p. 36. ISBN 0-309-05148-7.
  45. ^ Hansen, J. (2002). "Climate". Journal of Geophysical Research. 107: 4347. doi:10.1029/2001JD001143. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |unused_data= ignored (help)
  46. ^ Hansen, J. (2005). "Efficacy of climate forcings". Journal of Geophysical Research. 110: D18104. doi:10.1029/2005JD005776.
  47. ^ Randel, William J.; Shine, Keith P.; Austin, John; Barnett, John; Claud, Chantal; Gillett, Nathan P.; Keckhut, Philippe; Langematz, Ulrike; Lin, Roger (2009). "An update of observed stratospheric temperature trends". Journal of Geophysical Research. 114: D02107. doi:10.1029/2008JD010421.
  48. ^ Marsh, Nigel (2000). "Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate" (PDF). Space Science Reviews. 94 (1–2): 215–230. doi:10.1023/A:1026723423896. Retrieved 2007-04-17. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  49. ^ Lockwood, Mike (2007). "Recent oppositely directed trends in solar climate forcings and the global mean surface air temperature" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 463: 2447. doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1880. Retrieved 2007-07-21. Our results show that the observed rapid rise in global mean temperatures seen after 1985 cannot be ascribed to solar variability, whichever of the mechanisms is invoked and no matter how much the solar variation is amplified {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  50. ^ T Sloan and A W Wolfendale (2008). "Testing the proposed causal link between cosmic rays and cloud cover". Environ. Res. Lett. 3: 024001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024001. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)
  51. ^ Pierce, J.R. and P.J. Adams (2009). "Can cosmic rays affect cloud condensation nuclei by altering new particle formation rates?". Geophysical Research Letters. 36: L09820. doi:10.1029/2009GL037946.
  52. ^ a b Soden, Brian J. (2005-11-01). "An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models". Journal of Climate. 19 (14): 3354–3360. doi:10.1175/JCLI3799.1. Interestingly, the true feedback is consistently weaker than the constant relative humidity value, implying a small but robust reduction in relative humidity in all models on average" "clouds appear to provide a positive feedback in all models {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |format= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  53. ^ National Research Council (2004). Understanding Climate Change Feedbacks. Panel on Climate Change Feedbacks, Climate Research Committee. National Academies Press. ISBN 0309090725.
  54. ^ Stocker, Thomas F. (2001-01-20). "7.5.2 Sea Ice". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved 2007-02-11. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  55. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1029/GB002i003p00221, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1029/GB002i003p00221 instead.
  56. ^ Zimov, Sa; Schuur, Ea; Chapin, Fs (2006). "Climate change. Permafrost and the global carbon budget". Science (New York, N.Y.). 312 (5780): 1612–3. doi:10.1126/science.1128908. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 16778046. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  57. ^ Buesseler, Ken O. (2007-04-27). "Revisiting Carbon Flux Through the Ocean's Twilight Zone" (abstract). Science. 316 (5824): 567–570. doi:10.1126/science.1137959. PMID 17463282. Retrieved 2007-11-16. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  58. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1038/ngeo434, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1038/ngeo434 instead.
  59. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1029/2001GB001829, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1029/2001GB001829 instead.
  60. ^ Denman, K.L.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 7, Couplings Between Changes in the Climate System and Biogeochemistry" (PDF). Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved 2008-02-21. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  61. ^ Hansen, James (2000). Climatic Change: Understanding Global Warming. Health Press. Retrieved 2007-08-18. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  62. ^ Stocker, Thomas F. (2001). "7.2.2 Cloud Processes and Feedbacks". Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved 2007-03-04. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  63. ^ Torn, Margaret (2006). "Missing feedbacks, asymmetric uncertainties, and the underestimation of future warming". Geophysical Research Letters. 33 (10): L10703. doi:10.1029/2005GL025540. L10703. Retrieved 2007-03-04. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  64. ^ Harte, John (2006). "Shifts in plant dominance control carbon-cycle responses to experimental warming and widespread drought". Environmental Research Letters. 1 (1): 014001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/1/1/014001. 014001. Retrieved 2007-05-02. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  65. ^ Scheffer, Marten (2006). "Positive feedback between global warming and atmospheric CO2 concentration inferred from past climate change" (PDF). Geophysical Research Letters. 33: L10702. doi:10.1029/2005gl025044. Retrieved 2007-05-04. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  66. ^ Randall, D.A.; et al. (2007). "Chapter 8, Climate Models and Their Evaluation" (PDF). Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC. Retrieved 2009-03-21. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  67. ^ Stroeve, J.; et al. (2007). "Arctic sea ice decline: Faster than forecast". Geophysical Research Letters. 34: L09501. doi:10.1029/2007GL029703. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  68. ^ Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0646-0, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1007/s00382-009-0646-0 instead.
  69. ^ a b "Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change". IPCC. 2001-02-16. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
  70. ^ McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S (2006). "Climate change and human health: present and future risks". Lancet. 367 (9513): 859–69. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3. PMID 16530580.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  71. ^ "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. IPCC. 2007-04-13. Retrieved 2007-04-28.
  72. ^ Macey, Jennifer (September 19, 2007). "Global warming opens up Northwest Passage". ABC News. Retrieved 2007-12-11.
  73. ^ ftp://texmex.mit.edu/pub/emanuel/PAPERS/Emanuel_etal_2008.pdf
  74. ^ Knutson, Thomas R.; Sirutis, Joseph J.; Garner, Stephen T.; Vecchi, Gabriel A.; Held, Isaac M. (2008). "Simulated reduction in Atlantic hurricane frequency under twenty-first-century warming conditions". Nature Geoscience. 1: 359. doi:10.1038/ngeo202.
  75. ^ King, Gary M. Global Environmental Change Microbial Contributions Microbial Solutions (PDF). American Society for Microbiology. p. 7. Retrieved 2009-05-23. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  76. ^ Confalonieri, U.; Menne, B.; Ebi, R.; Hauengue, M.; Kovats, R.S.; Revich, B.; Woodward, A. (2007). "Chapter 8: Human Health" (PDF). In Parry, M.L.; Canziani, O.F.; Palutikof, J.P.; van der Linden, P.J.; Hanson, C.E. (eds.). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521-88010-7. {{cite book}}: |author4-first= missing |author4-last= (help); More than one of |author= and |author1-last= specified (help)
  77. ^ Shaffer, G., S.M. Olsen and G.O.P Pederson (2009). "Long-term ocean oxygen depletion in response to carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels". Nature Geoscience. 2: 105–109. doi:10.1038/ngeo420.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  78. ^ "Carbon Cycle". NASA. Retrieved 2009-06-24.
  79. ^ Jacobson, Mark Z. (2005-04-02). "Studying ocean acidification with conservative, stable numerical schemes for nonequilibrium air-ocean exchange and ocean equilibrium chemistry" (PDF). Journal of Geophysical Research. 110 (D7): D07302. doi:10.1029/2004JD005220. D07302. Retrieved 2007-04-28.
  80. ^ Caldeira, Ken (2005-09-21). "Ocean model predictions of chemistry changes from carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere and ocean". Journal of Geophysical Research. 110 (C09S04): 1–12. doi:10.1029/2004JC002671. Retrieved 2006-02-14. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  81. ^ Raven, John A.; et al. (2005-06-30). "Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide" (ASP). Royal Society. Retrieved 2007-05-04. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  82. ^ Thomas, Chris D.; Cameron, A; Green, RE; Bakkenes, M; Beaumont, LJ; Collingham, YC; Erasmus, BF; De Siqueira, MF; Grainger, A (2004-01-08). "Extinction risk from climate change" (PDF). Nature. 427 (6970): 145–138. doi:10.1038/nature02121. PMID 14712274. Retrieved 2007-03-18. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |first1= and |first= specified (help); More than one of |last1= and |last= specified (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  83. ^ McLaughlin, John F. (2002-04-30). "Climate change hastens population extinctions" (PDF). PNAS. 99 (9): 6070–6074. doi:10.1073/pnas.052131199. PMC 122903. PMID 11972020. Retrieved 2007-03-29. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  84. ^ Botkin, Daniel B. (2007). "Forecasting the Effects of Global Warming on Biodiversity" (PDF). BioScience. 57 (3): 227–236. doi:10.1641/B570306. Retrieved 2007-11-30. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  85. ^ Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.) (2007). "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. p. 22. Retrieved 2009-05-20. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  86. ^ "At-a-glance: The Stern Review". BBC. 2006-10-30. Retrieved 2007-04-29.
  87. ^ Tol, R. and G. Yohe (2006). "A Review of the Stern Review" (PDF). World Economics. 7 (4): 233–250.
  88. ^ Mendelsohn, R. (2006–2007). "A Critique of the Stern Report" (PDF). Regulation. Retrieved 2009-05-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  89. ^ Nordhaus, W. (2005). "The Economics of Climate Change, Part Two: Comments on the Stern Review. Chapter 5: William Nordhaus, Yale University, 'Opposite Ends of the Globe'". Yale Center for the Study of Globalization. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
  90. ^ Barker, T. (August 2008). "The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change. An editorial essay on The Stern Review". Climatic Change. 89 (Volume 89, Numbers 3–4 / August, 2008): 173–194. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9433-x. Retrieved 2009-05-20. {{cite journal}}: |issue= has extra text (help)
  91. ^ Cline, W. (January 5, 2008). "Comments on the Stern Review". Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
  92. ^ Ackerman, F. (July 2007). "Debating Climate Economics: The Stern Review vs. Its Critics" (PDF). Report to Friends of the Earth-UK. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
  93. ^ Terry Barker (April 14, 2008). "Full quote from IPCC on costs of climate change". FT.com. Retrieved 2008-04-14.
  94. ^ Dlugolecki, Andrew (2002). "Climate Risk to Global Economy" (PDF). CEO Briefing: UNEP FI Climate Change Working Group. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved 2007-04-29. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  95. ^ "Thomas Schelling: Developing Countries Will Suffer Most from Global Warming" (PDF). Resources 164. Retrieved 2008-03-01.
  96. ^ a b "Summary for Policymakers" (PDF). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007-05-04. Retrieved 2007-12-09.
  97. ^ "Kyoto Protocol Status of Ratification" (PDF). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2006-07-10. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
  98. ^ "Twenty-sixth session and Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG), Third session". United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
  99. ^ Adam, David (14 April 2009). "World will not meet 2C warming target, climate change experts agree". Guardian News and Media Limited. Retrieved 2009-04-14. The poll comes as UN negotiations to agree a new global treaty to regulate carbon pollution gather pace in advance of a key meeting in Copenhagen in December. Officials will try to agree a successor to the Kyoto protocol, the first phase of which expires in 2012.
  100. ^ "Barack Obama and Joe Biden: New Energy for America". Retrieved 2008-12-19.
  101. ^ Boland, John J. (1997). "Assessing Urban Water Use and the Role of Water Conservation Measures under Climate Uncertainty". Climatic Change. 37 (1): 157–176. doi:10.1023/A:1005324621274.
  102. ^ Adams, R.M.; et al. (1990). "Global climate change and US agriculture". Nature. 345: 219. doi:10.1038/345219a0. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  103. ^ Nicholls, R (2004). "Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios". Global Environmental Change. 14: 69. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.007.
  104. ^ Vanlieshout, M, R.S. Kovats, M.T.J. Livermore and P. Martens (2004). "Climate change and malaria: analysis of the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios". Global Environmental Change. 14: 87. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.009.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  105. ^ Hulme, P.E. (2005). "Adapting to climate change: is there scope for ecological management in the face of a global threat?". Journal of Applied Ecology. 42 (5): 784. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01082.x.
  106. ^ "Climate Change: Adapting to the inevitable" (PDF). IMechE. Retrieved 2009-03-07.
  107. ^ Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: Mitigation, Adaptation, and the Science Base(1992), Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy(COSEPUP)
  108. ^ Keith, D.W., M. Ha-Duong and J.K. Stolaroff (2006). "Climate Strategy with CO2 Capture from the Air". Climatic Change. 74: 17. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-9026-x.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  109. ^ Crutzen, Paul J. (2006). "Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?". Climatic Change. 77: 211. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y.
  110. ^ The Independent, May 27, 2009, Obama's climate guru: Paint your roof white!
  111. ^ Royal Society, September 1, 2009, Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty
  112. ^ M. Granger Morgan, Technology Review, January/February 2010, Why Geoengineering? We should study the costs and consequences of solar radiation management
  113. ^ Kevin Bullis, Technology Review, January/February 2010, The Geoengineering Gambit
  114. ^ Weart, Spencer (2006). "The Public and Climate Change". In Weart, Spencer (ed.). The Discovery of Global Warming. American Institute of Physics. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
  115. ^ Revkin, Andrew (2007-04-01). "Poor Nations to Bear Brunt as World Warms". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-05-02.
  116. ^ Brahic, Catherine (2006-04-25). "China's emissions may surpass the US in 2007". New Scientist. Retrieved 2007-05-02.
  117. ^ "Australia ratifies Kyoto Protocol". Sydney Morning Herald. December 3, 2007. Retrieved Jan 21, 2010.
  118. ^ Max, Arthur. "US envoy says China wants top line US technology in exchange for reining in CO2 emissions". Star Tribune. Associated Press. Retrieved 2009-06-26.
  119. ^ "Chinese object to climate draft". BBC. 2008-05-01. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
  120. ^ Mufson, Steven (2007-06-06). "In Battle for U.S. Carbon Caps, Eyes and Efforts Focus on China". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
  121. ^ "China now top carbon polluter". BBC News. 2008-04-14. Retrieved 2008-04-22.
  122. ^ "Group: China tops world in CO2 emissions". USA Today. Associated Press. 2007-06-20. Retrieved 2007-10-16.
  123. ^ "Group: China surpassed US in carbon emissions in 2006: Dutch report". livemint.com. Reuters. 2007-06-20. Retrieved 2007-10-16.
  124. ^ Casey, Michael (2007-12-07). "China Says West Should Deal With Warming". Newsvine. Retrieved 2009-06-06.
  125. ^ IANS (2009-02-05). "India can't be exempt from mandatory greenhouse gas emission cap: John Kerry". Thaindian.com. Retrieved 2009-06-24.
  126. ^ Pelham, Brett (2009-04-22). "Awareness, Opinions About Global Warming Vary Worldwide". Gallup. Retrieved 2009-07-14.
  127. ^ "Summary of Findings". Little Consensus on Global Warming. Partisanship Drives Opinion. Pew Research Center. 2006-07-12. Retrieved 2007-04-14.
  128. ^ Blair, Tony (2009-07-03). "Breaking the Climate Deadlock". Kosovo Times. Retrieved 2009-07-03.
  129. ^ Richards, Holly (2009-07-02). "Energy bill causing some tension among U.S. officials". Coshocton Tribune. Retrieved 2009-07-03.
  130. ^ Begley, Sharon (2007-08-13). "The Truth About Denial". Newsweek. Retrieved 2007-08-13.
  131. ^ Adams, David (2006-09-20). "Royal Society tells Exxon: stop funding climate change denial". The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-08-09.
  132. ^ "Exxon cuts ties to global warming skeptics". MSNBC. 2007-01-12. Retrieved 2007-05-02.
  133. ^ Sandell, Clayton (2007-01-03). "Report: Big Money Confusing Public on Global Warming". ABC. Retrieved 2007-04-27.
  134. ^ "New Report Provides Authoritative Assessment of National, Regional Impacts of Global Climate Change" (PDF) (Press release). U.S. Global Change Research Program. June 6, 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-27.
  135. ^ Reuters (May 18, 2007). "Greenpeace: Exxon still funding climate skeptics". USA Today. Retrieved Jan 21, 2010. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  136. ^ "Global Warming Resolutions at U.S. Oil Companies Bring Policy Commitments from Leaders, and Record High Votes at Laggards" (Press release). Ceres. 2004-04-28. Retrieved 2007-07-27.
  137. ^ "Does Population Growth Impact Climate Change?". Scientific American. July 29, 2009. Retrieved Jan 21, 2010.
  138. ^ Gray, Louise (December 8, 2009). "Copenhagen climate summit issues: population growth". Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved Jan 21, 2010.
  139. ^ "Once taboo, population enters climate debate". The Independent. December 5, 2009. Retrieved Jan 21, 2010.

Further reading

Template:Wikipedia-Books

Research

Educational

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Climate_change&oldid=341522302"