User talk:Jayadevp13

Jayadevp13

User page   Talk page   Contributions   Awards & such   Sandbox   Guestbook   All public logs   Send Email Welcome! Hello, Jayadevp13, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: The five pillars of Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page and How to develop articles How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish) Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Salih (talk) 15:47, 17 November 2011 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 20 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Shaktinagar, Uttar Pradesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to NTPC Singrauli Super Thermal Power Station (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver) added a link pointing to Shaktinagar It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 20 January 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for January 27 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tourism in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Periyar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC) Regarding Indian Space Programme Template. Hi, In the row mentioning satellites you had reverted my edit from IRNSS-1 to IRNSS, wouldn't it be better if we can list out the satellites or mention the link to template for satellite series say 'Remote Sensing Satellites' where we can give the links like IRNSS-1,IRNSS-2 etc..simply means just for disambiguation. Thanks Gaurav Pruthitalk 05:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC) No, I don't think the idea you gave would be nice. After editing the template it really looks comparatively less congested and after all I have mentioned each satellite in brackets near the name of satellite series.Jayadevp13 (talk) 12:25, 7 February 2013 (UTC) Its fine, I ws just taking your view ,BTW that looks better too. Thanks a lot. Gaurav Pruthitalk 10:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC) No need to mention it dude. It's Wikipedia and a template relating to India. We all need to work together to improve it. By the way should we add links to individual satellites in INSAT & GSAT series as added in RISAT & IRNSS? What do you think? Waiting to hear your view. Jayadevp13 (talk) 11:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC) yup, that will be better, will add these too in my worklist Gaurav Pruthitalk 11:40, 8 February 2013 (UTC) Good work man. I have added the satellite of INSAT series also. You can take a look of it here-Template:Indian space program. Again waiting to hear from you. Regards. Jayadevp13 (talk) 05:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC) To know the no. of edits made by me How do I know the total number of edits I have ever made in Wikipedia except manualy counting them in the User Contributions page. Please help. I will be thankful for your help. Jayadevp13 (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Hi Jayadevp13. If you scroll down to the bottom of your contributions page, there's a link that says "edit count". You can click on this link to find out how many edits you have made so far and of what type. You can also examine the edit history of other editors using the same tool. -- Dianna (talk) 05:10, 9 February 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your help. Jayadevp13 (talk) 06:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC) List of NTPC Power Stations That is not a list your created. It is called a template. I moved it to the proper spot Template:NTPC Power Stations. There is already a template that duplicates yours, Template:Power stations of Uttar Pradesh. I'm not sure, but I think your should be deleted and keep the current one. Bgwhite (talk) 07:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Thank you. Both are actually different templates. One gives the power stations in Uttar Pradesh, a state in India while the other gives the power stations owned by the company NTPC. It has plants all over India. So no need of deleting any of the templates. I am soon going to categorise and de-orphan the template. Opinions sought. Regards. Jayadevp13 (talk) 12:29, 16 February 2013 (UTC) To delete a template and it's talkpage {{adminhelp}} I accidentally made exactly 2 copies of the same template. I request you to delete this one- Template:List of NTPC Power Stations and it's talk page and instead keep Template:NTPC Power Stations and it's talk page. It's my humble request. I will try not to commit such a mistake again. Do add a redirect link. Jayadevp13 (talk) 07:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC)  Done. Don't worry! Another time, for any page where you are the only contributor, you can request deletion by putting {{db-author}} at the top (two curly brackets each side). To turn a page into a redirect, you can simply edit it yourself. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your help. Jayadevp13 (talk) 12:12, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Deleted Edits? I wanted to know what actually does the Deleted Edits in the edit counter mean? But when seeing the Special:Preferences page, all the edits show together. Please help. Jayadevp13 (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC) "Deleted edits" are edits to pages which have since been deleted. They aren't necessarily a bad thing; an efficient New Page Patroller will have "deleted edits" for all the speedy-delete tags s/he puts on pages which are then deleted. The total on the Edit Counter doesn't agree with the total in Special:Preferences, and I don't know why that is. The place to ask that would be WP:VPT. JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Thankyou. Jayadevp13 (talk) 05:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Live edits are edits to pages that are currently visible; while deleted edits are edits to pages that have been deleted (well actually, hidden from public view). All edits normally count as live edits, but if you edit a page and it is later deleted, all of your edits to that page are counted as deleted edits. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 05:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Also, I don't know exactly why, but for some reason Preferences shows total edits (live edits + deleted edits), but the edit counter shows them individually. I don't think there is any particular reason why, but someone else may know. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 05:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Thank You for telling. Jayadevp13 (talk) 05:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC) You're welcome! The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 05:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC) There are two ways to get an edit count: either by using the user_editcount field of the user table in the database, which is the count displayed in your preferences, or by counting your contributions individually, which is the method used by tools such as X!'s edit counter. The database field is just a number which combines live and deleted edits, while the tools count live and deleted contributions separately. Also, the database field does not count edits made while moving a page (among other things), while the live tools do. Graham87 07:37, 25 February 2013 (UTC) So that's where the difference is, I guess. Thanks for the detailed info! The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 08:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Ya really. Thank you for telling. Jayadevp13 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 26 Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi Memorial Lecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Sapphire (satellite) Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sapphire (satellite) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PKT(alk) 12:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Your intention appears to be good, but don't set up a title with no article content to go with it. It's far better to write the information in your user pages then transfer it to regular article space when it's ready to go. PKT(alk) 12:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC) You will now find that another person created an article for Sapphire with sufficient content. PKT(alk) 16:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC) Thank you for telling. Actually after creating the page, I was looking for more information and references when the page was deleted. Now there is no problem since the page has been created again with information in it. I will try not to do such a mistake again. Regards. Jayadevp13 (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Regarding WikiProject:Indian Space Programme Hi Jayadev, Hope you are doing well, just want to request you if you can check the feasibility if we can start 'WikiProject:Indian Space Programme' where we can aggregate the work we can do for Indian Space Programme, I haven't find any any such programme perhaps there might be one.It will require your contribution too if we can, that will be of great worth Thanks a lot Gaurav Pruthitalk 11:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC) I think it is a superb idea. Also, there would several others users who would be interested in serving the WikiProject. I have searched a lot and didn't find any WikiProject similar to this one. However the two points which may create some problems/confusions are Till now no WikiProject has been created dealing with the space programmes of a specific country. Maybe that there might be some opposition although it's chances are very less. Wether the name of the WikiProject would be Indian Space Programme or Indian Space Program? Regards. Jayadevp13 (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC) Please, please, please don't do that - the spaceflight project was assembled out of several subprojects which were completely inactive due to a split editor base. Please simply join in the project work there, you'll be most welcome! SalopianJames (talk) 14:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Join the project work where? -BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC) Why, at WP:SPACEFLIGHT of course! SalopianJames (talk) 20:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC) I was thinking of region specific work, may be if its possible to create subproject under WP:SPACEFLIGHT, that will continue exposition of the work, if somebody became inactive and WP:SPACEFLIGHT will continue to be the parent project. Looking for more inputs. Gaurav Pruthitalk 04:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC) If you can demonstrate that several editors would be interested, I would suggest proposing a working group within WikiProject Spaceflight. Unfortunately we never actually defined the procedure for creating one, but just create a new topic on WT:SPACEFLIGHT explaining what you hope to achieve, setting some goals, and showing people are interested in participating. We can then discuss the proposal, and help you get started if it looks viable. --W. D. Graham 21:56, 12 March 2013 (UTC) Minsk Metro station stubs Why are you adding the {{too few opinions}} tag to purely factual stubs such as Grushevka (Minsk Metro), Mikhalovo (Minsk Metro) and Piatroushchyna (Minsk Metro)? And, in the last case, you also added {{out of date}} with no explanation. I have deleted all these tags while stub-sorting the articles. Please stop adding inappropriate tags to articles, as this just wastes other editors' time and damages the encyclopedia. If you have serious concerns about articles like these, please comment on their talk pages in cases where the problem is not obvious to other editors from the content of the article. Thanks. PamD 15:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Actually what I wanted to tell/show was that only the opening dates and the metro service to which the stations belonged to were written. The article didn't give any other significant information. At least the facilities available should have been written. Moreover other informations like the reactions of the people towards the opening of the station need to be written. It could be positive (transport for people have become easier or it provided employment oportunities) or negative (may be problems caused by land acquisition or any other such problems). This is the reason for adding {{too few opinions}} tag. There were actually no mention of any opinions. I accept that the tag {{out of date}} was added by mistake. Waiting to hear you views on my explanation. Sorry if my edits were disruptive. Regards Jayadevp13 (talk) 16:21, 21 March 2013 (UTC) All stub articles, and most other articles, are in need of expansion. That's what the stub tag is for. {{Too few opinions}} should be reserved for cases where there are political or other viewpoints - it's not the same as "too little information" which is what you seem to want to say! If a particular area is especially lacking in an article, make a comment on the talk page (or add it yourself). If a section is very inadequate, you can add {{expand section}}. These station articles could probably be expanded in many ways - the architecture of their buildings, any controversy before they were built, the important role they play in the network, the origin of the station name (I'm just guessing, for all of these). But I think you added the wrong tag. I noticed similary that you'd tag-bombed Obesity in Brazil. Are you saying that the viewpoint that it isn't a problem should be included? Or just that, again, it needs expansion? What's "out of date" there - are you seriously concerned that the statistics quoted are about a year old? Please slow down and think about the tags you add to articles. Less is sometimes more. "Unreferenced" and "Notability" are usually the most important where relevant. Happy editing! PamD 16:33, 21 March 2013 (UTC) PamD beat me to it! Though your enthusiasm is welcome, Jayadevp13, you seem to be over-tagging articles, rather than highlighting the most important problem. For example New Wave (Malayalam film genre) has three tags which essentially say the same thing. With Off the Grid (food organization) you tagged it as a stub, but then said it was long enough to be divided into sections! Please take a little more time to consider whether one tag will do the same job as two (or three). All the best! Sionk (talk) 19:10, 21 March 2013 (UTC) And I've just found your tags on Katsuki Hagiwara where (among over unnecessary tags) you give a cleanup tag with statement "The references are in Japanese language. Trusted English sources need to be found." This is just not true - see WP:NOENG which says "Because this is the English Wikipedia, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones, assuming English sources of equal quality and relevance are available.". That's "preferred", not "needed". Please slow down, check Wikipedia policies, and stop adding inappropriate tags to articles. Yes, I realise that one was tagged earlier today before you had started to receive feedback on your tagging. PamD 20:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Ok! I accept my mistakes and would try to correct them. Once again sorry for the disruptive edits. Please forgive me. It was my 1st day using page curation. Thank you for the comments & suggestions. It would do me good in the future. - Jayadevp13 (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC) There's a lot to learn about editing Wikipedia, but it's an interesting journey. Good luck with your editing. And thanks for the coffee and the cookies - a kind thought. PamD 08:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Hurn Museum You tagged this for speedy deletion as "no content" and "no context", although it quite clearly stated what it is, gave a link to its website, had an infobox with location information. Please read carefully the criteria for speedy deletion before nominating for deletion an article like this. The editor who removed the tags kindly assumed that the page had been edited since your tagging, though this was not the case. Your use of Page Curation in the last few days has been pretty disruptive to the encyclopedia, and I hope you will note the various comments and go more carefully in future. PamD 23:15, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Thank you for pointing out my mistakes. I will try to learn from them. - Jayadevp13 (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Please help me on providing citations inside article Thanks for reviewing the article Ghari Detergent. Please help me on providing citations inside article. How to do that? Please share a video guide of help page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satya24x7 (talk • contribs) 06:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Please see if this Wikipedian article is useful for you - Citing sources. Read it carefully. For making citing sources easier, you can also use the tool ProveIt. The instructions for using the tool are in the page itself. Regards. Jayadevp13 (talk) 06:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Thank u Thanks//(SimSimu (talk) 17:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)). DBigXray Letting you know that I removed the TB you placed in User:DBigXray's talk as he has been inactive for so long since Aug'12.He is busy due to personal issues and indicated that he won't be returning for some time. Cheers TheStrikeΣagle 15:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC) Thank you for letting me know. - Jayadevp13 15:44, 28 March 2013 (UTC) File permission problem with File:A scaled down model of Brahmos-II at Aero India 2013.jpg Thanks for uploading File:A scaled down model of Brahmos-II at Aero India 2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC) The author of the work Shiv Aroor has sent me the required permissions for using the file to my e-mail address. I have forwarded the mail two times to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. One on Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 05:19 AM (UTC) and the other on Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:17 PM (UTC). Both of them have not got any response. Please help me if you can. If it's late again, the file will be deleted even-though I have the permissions. Thank You. - Jayadevp13 11:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC) According to Commons:Category:OTRS pending, there is a huge backlog for those e-mails: some messages as old as 100 days haven't been handled yet. I assume that your e-mails will be processed eventually, but it may take some time. The problem is that there seem to be too few people who handle those e-mails. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC) Help regarding my edits in German Wikipedia When I used the tool Global user contributions tool at http://toolserver.org/ it shows that I have made 55 edits. It can be seen at this link. But when I use the SUL Info tool, it shows I have made zero edits - link. The Global user manager of Wikipedia also shows 0 edits - Special:CentralAuth/Jayadevp13. But when I see the My contributions page of the German Wikipedia, it shows my contributions. They are 55. I have manually counted them. The edit counter by Tparis also shows 55 edits in German wikipedia. But the worst of all things is that I have never in my life contributed to the German Wikipedia. Nor do I know a bit of German language. Please help in clearing this confusion. Some of your contributions were imported to the German Wikipedia from the English Wikipedia. When this occurred, your username was copied over in the edit history, just as when a page is moved internally, you are shown as having edited at the new location. The reason for the discrepancy in edit counts has to do with differences in how edits are counted by different tools. Rich Farmbrough (talk · contribs) figured this out, by the way. Hope that helps. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your help. Have a Good day! - Jayadevp13 07:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Rollback granted Hi Jayadevp13. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits. Rollback should never be used to edit war. If abused, rollback rights can be revoked. Use common sense. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 16:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC) JKT48 Hi Jayadevp13. I submitted a rollback to an edit you rejected on the article JKT48. The reason why I submitted the rollback was because the revision you rejected was probably an attempt to revert possible vandalism. A name (Tryanto Kusumawardhana) was added on the list of the group members, and as I checked on the group's official website, there was no such name. The last rejected revision attempted to remove that name. I actually wanted to manually edit it and add an edit summary, however, I had accidentally clicked the rollback button and as such was unable to write an edit summary. That's why I sent you this to inform you about my intent. Anyways sorry for bothering and thank you. KuRiZu (talk) 13:57, 27 April 2013 (UTC) Thank you for telling it to me. I was mistaken because of not seeing an edit summary or any such thing. - Jayadevp13 17:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC) Update to the PSLV page I have removed or re-formatted many of your edits on PSLV for following reasons: Data redundancy to satellite/payload pages (much of data is irrelevant to launch vehicle page) Nationalistic bias If you have objections, please discuss with me before making any edits on PSLV page. Best regards, Trurle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trurle (talk • contribs) 03:49, 3 May 2013 (UTC) Thank You for making the required changes, especially the data redundancy to satellite/payload pages. Since I am observing an enforced Wikibreak till May 31 2014 due to study and educational reasons, I won't be able to use my account. This is the reason why I am replying using my IP. If you have any message, please add it here or send me an e-mail. Regards. - 117.199.191.221 (talk) 12:32, 5 May 2013 (UTC) Please comment on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2013 Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2013. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 18:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC) Y Already done. - Jayadevp13 02:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi Memorial Lecture If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi Memorial Lecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2013 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Oceansat-1 If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article. You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles. A tag has been placed on Oceansat-1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC) May 2013 Hello Jayadevp13, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here. You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here. Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research. Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste. In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow. Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC) Thank You for taking your time to tell this to me. But for my edits to which page are you posting this message? If it is for 2013 Naxal attack in Darbha valley, then they have already been removed. - Jayadevp13 02:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC) Your recreation of Oceansat-1 violated WP:PARAPHRASE. I have removed the infringing text; please do not restore it. Please also read, and follow WP:PARAPHRASE. If you continue adding copyright violations to Wikipedia you are likely to be blocked from editing. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC) What else should I use for these lines - "solid state camera which operated in eight narrow spectral bands" and "operated in four microwave frequencies in both the vertical and horizontal polarisations". You also removed/changed both of these lines - "Oceansat-1 had carried only two payloads. One was Ocean Colour Monitor (OCM) and the other was Multi - frequency Scanning Microwave Radiometer (MSMR)". Those were entirely mine. I have not restored/modified the text till now. I am waiting for your reply. Please also see WP:LIMITED. Thanks. Regards. - Jayadevp13 14:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Talkback It is better to add a new talkback than to change timestamp. --Tito Dutta (contact) 08:21, 27 May 2013 (UTC) I didn't actually understand what you are trying to say. Do you mean that I should add an entirely new talkback message, leaving the old one at it's place? But what is the use of it? - Jayadevp13 15:33, 28 May 2013 (UTC) Yes, add a new talkback message or write below previous talkback message "1 new message" etc! --Tito Dutta (contact) 18:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)