User:Cyberbot I/AfD's requiring attention

Below are the top 25 AfD discussions which are most urgently in need of attention from !voters. The urgency for each AfD is calculated based on various statistics, including current number of votes, time until closing date, number of times relisted, overall discussion length, etc. This page is updated by a bot roughly every 6 hours, and was last updated on 18:15, 15 August 2016 (UTC).

AfD	Time to close	Votes	Size (bytes)	Relists	Score
Microtrac	8 years ago	1	4240	3	436.26
Ungudi Quiawacana	8 years ago	1	3027	2	431.06
Peshwa Acharya	8 years ago	1	2876	2	430.66
Yuri Avalishvili	8 years ago	1	6039	2	417.34
Bollywood Bubble	8 years ago	1	2832	1	416.51
Radar Recordings (3rd nomination)	8 years ago	1	3677	1	415.28
Richard Anthony Jay (2nd nomination)	8 years ago	0	3116	2	402.34
Gioconda Vessichelli	8 years ago	0	4008	2	402.08
Stellent (3rd nomination)	8 years ago	1	3812	0	392.91
MyBuilder	8 years ago	1	6954	1	391.27
CPPSERV	8 years ago	1	1831	0	389.12
Lalit Prabhakar	8 years ago	0	2162	1	388.64
Box Cricket League	8 years ago	0	1881	0	380.44
Bionic Jive	8 years ago	1	2350	0	375.77
Rockto	8 years ago	0	2020	0	360.39
Blaccode	8 years ago	0	1552	0	356.75
ProjectWise	8 years ago	1	3580	0	356.57
Nard & B	8 years ago	0	2634	1	355.58
Victor Tognola	8 years ago	1	4105	2	353.67
Hao Xiang Shopping TV	8 years ago	1	4542	2	353.4
Michael J. Hickey	8 years ago	1	3297	2	352.8
Soulsister Ambassador	8 years ago	1	3057	2	352.34
Keith Moor (journalist)	8 years ago	0	2982	0	345.49
King Myers	8 years ago	1	4238	1	343.53
The Dave & Chris Show!	8 years ago	1	3043	1	343.12

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:25, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Microtrac

Microtrac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm unable to find any sunstantial coverage of this company in RS as is required to meet WP:CORP. SmartSE (talk) 14:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 18:38, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 17:19, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 04:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete Amazingly, this 40+ year old company has virtually no press coverage that I could find. BoyRD (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Ungudi Quiawacana

Ungudi Quiawacana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsure that this athlete passes WP:NTRACK (certainly doesn't pass GNG). Black Kite (talk) 21:05, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane2007 ^talk 01:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete She completely fails NTRACK, and there's no indication she meets GNG; the only hope for this article would be significant coverage in local Portuguese or Angolan sources, but I can't find anything better than trivial mentions. Sideways713 (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:21, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Peshwa Acharya

Peshwa Acharya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable Indian Businessman Uncletomwood (talk) 11:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -- strictly promotional content and no notability. Should this perhaps have been PRODed? K.e.coffman (talk) 02:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:37, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Yuri Avalishvili

Yuri Avalishvili (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see how this person passes WP:ARTIST - difficult to understand much of the content that may hint towards notability, but (as a basic test), the only non ex-soviet bloc organisation to engage with him (the boston one) doesn't seem notable in itself, and a google search of subject + gallery throws up no results (also note entire list is unreferenced).
almost no references. SPA/COI editor. horrendously written article. orphan article since its creation. many other issues. Rayman60 (talk) 22:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

• Comment There is a significant claim to notability that would satisfy WP:ARTIST. If Avalishvili's work has indeed been collected by the Art Museum of Georgia and the National Gallery of Armenia, 4(d) would be met. I have not been able to find any sources that corroborate that claim, mostly because I understand neither [Georgian nor Armenian. Both museums have a searchable database of their collections, so perhaps someone who can read those languages has better luck than I did. If I have to go by the sources available in English, I cannnot find Avalishvili him or the Museum of Modern Renaissance notable. The Museum of Modern Renaissance seems to have anticipated this, as their website proudly states "Modern Renaissance is not to be found in any Encyclopedia of Art". Perhaps it should remain so. Mduvekot (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:05, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 23:08, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment - I tried looking through google to help with sources, but found nothing with my limited English-dependent search abilities. I do assume there might be some good coverage in another language, unfortunately I'm not good at guessing which translation of his name to use for a search term in those cases. Yvarta (talk) 01:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
• Strong delete It's an extremely interesting case. So, I think we do have a good reasons to delete in article. First of all it does look like a PR article - an author's only work, which is the same for Russian wikipedia, in which creator with the same user name made the only contribution. The Russian article is also of very poor quality, tagged as non satisfying Wikipedia standards. Second, taking into account all the claims of notability in Russia, including competitions and gallery shows, I'd expected to find quite a lot of sources on Russian, which I didn't. Almost no mentions in any secondary sources, not related to PR articles from galleries. Third, for a such celebrated artist it's quite a funny to have a site, made on schoolchild level and located on narod.ru platform - a simple amateur website platform for Russian internet. And the last one - the claim for notability is made by showing permanent collections - on his site there are scans of documents, showing him making donations to Art Museum of Georgia and the National Gallery of Armenia. A bit of a weak claim for notability. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:50, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Bollywood Bubble

Bollywood Bubble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a promotion nothing else. There are no proper references for the site and also all references can be easily available for any website. Highedit (talk) 18:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -- promo content on a non-notable web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Its only promotion and should be deleted by any admin. Highedit (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment -- the coverage that I see is only trivial mentions with no substance. The page was created by Special:Contributions/Bollywoodbubble so we most likely have situation of COI editing here. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:06, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Radar Recordings

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Radar Recordings
• Articles for deletion/Radar Recordings (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Radar Recordings (3rd nomination)

Radar Recordings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Sources in the article are either unreliable or only provide passing mentions, and source searches are only providing passing mentions, such as this. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:12, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:14, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -- typical advertorial for an unremarkable label. As noted by the nom, sources are insufficient to meet CORPDEPTH and GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:10, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment -- the nom and I often don't agree on what constitutes sufficient coverage to satisfy GNG and CORPDEPTH; so in this case, this is telling me that there's very little to go on. :-) . I cannot find any sources even if I search in combination with the artists that appeared on the label. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Richard Anthony Jay

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Richard Anthony Jay
• Articles for deletion/Richard Anthony Jay (2nd nomination)

Richard Anthony Jay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:21, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR) (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Gioconda Vessichelli

Gioconda Vessichelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo/fan article about a non-notable singer. Despite the enthusiastic article and reasonable number of references she fails WP:GNG. Very few ghits; the "awards" are mostly honourable mentions in minor competitions. Andyjsmith (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Actually Gioconda is a known singer, her fanpage has hundreds of thousands of fans, a lot of followers to all her posts, and in just one hour she has got almost 350.000 views on facebook live chat:

https://www.facebook.com/giocondasinger/videos/749720841835080/

The competition she won are actually important, and newspaper articles have been written about these competitions

Considering the number of people following her, her singing in the soundtrack of Bollywood movie Prague, singing the song "Thodi Daaru" with famous Indian singer Mika Singh, the competitions she won, she deserves of being mentioned in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.186.230.180 (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of acquisitions by Oracle. And merge as needed.  Sandstein  20:46, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Stellent

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Stellent
• Articles for deletion/Stellent (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/Stellent (3rd nomination)

Stellent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunate we have to come here (but I hope we have a consensus) since the past 2 were closed as "NC" and then "SK", my own searches have noticeably found nothing better at all, and it quite easily showed that; nothing at all for actual substance. SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment – The company was previously named "Intranet Solutions". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
• (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Selective Merge to Oracle Corporation, which acquired the company in 2006, yet the article has no mention of Stellent. This will serve to improve the merge target article as a functional and appropriate WP:ATD. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
• Comment -- this is a tough one. As a publicly traded company, Stellent would have been presumed notable under WP:LISTED, but I'm not sure if this still applies to the company that's been acquired. For a sizable company (500+ ppl) and a acquisition target by Oracle, it's surprising that it's tough to find any coverage of substance. It gets a passing mention in ZDNet, but that's the extent of what I was able to find, apart from an article in Content Management World. Separately, I don't think that Oracle would be the right target, as that article is already well developed, and Oracle has acquired dozens of companies. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:32, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
• Comment - FWIW, this one is best relisted to clarify and specify between Deleting and then Redirecting; I will note that although this could simply be redirected, I believe it's best deleted and then redirected, considering there's nothing to actually keep if it's not in fact independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
• Comment – Some of the content is worthy of merging into Oracle Corporation. Notice how the article covers several aspects of its relation to Oracle, yet the Oracle Corporation article has no mention of the company. This is a functional and appropriate outcome, per Wikipedia's editing policy: WP:PRESERVE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
• Redirect to List of acquisitions by Oracle -- better target vs the main Oracle Corporation article. In the List article the name of the company is not written correctly so it's red linked at the moment. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
• Comment – I'd be fine with a selective merge to List of acquisitions by Oracle. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

MyBuilder

MyBuilder (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I frankly was going to PROD first too but here we are; my searches are simply not finding anything substantial and, instead, the sources are press releases, trivial local coverage and the like (including one where they were "celebrating their customers"). Even the sources listed here are all unconvincing, with them being for funding, trivial passing mentions, press releases and overall not acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:48, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -- an advertorial of an article. Does not meet CORPDEPTH at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment – The company was previously named Buildersite Limited. Below are some custom source search parameters. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Comment – Below are some sources inre the topic. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:34, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

References

• BBC News
• DMG Media
• Campaign
• Metro
• The Guardian

• Comment - Listed sources are only interviews and local people using it, that's not actually substantial. SwisterTwister talk 01:38, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment – Only The Guardian source listed above is an interview. Other sources have some quotations, but are not interviews. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • The BBC coverage is PR driven:

"The website which was established in 2006 has just received a substantial cash injection from Paul Birch, co-founder of Bebo and the Accelerator Group which invested in the start-up of Agent Provocateur and Lovefilm.

"Positive response: The money will be spent on technology, marketing and customer support. Former stonemason and CEO of Buildersite Ryan Notz said: "This funding will enable us to expand the team to enhance our offering of reputation-driven matches. "The take-up and feedback from our users has been fantastic so far - it's a real buzz to build something that is really changing a market."

"Builders who use the site have responded positively to the news. Cymon Allen, a plumber from Tunbridge Wells, said: "Finding a good tradesman is fraught with problems and anything that helps weed out the cowboys is excellent news for everyone connected with the building trade."

They got an investment and they got some press.

In this example, they are getting coverage for their ad campaign:

"Oiled-up builders parade in ad to introduce MyBuilder.com: MyBuilder.com, the website that helps consumers find local builders and tradesmen, is to launch a TV ad directed by Mark Denton and starring builders in skimpy blue swimming trunks."

These mentions all appears trivial. Why MyBuilder is worthy or note is not clear -- okay, they have a clever marketing campaign and they got funding. But that's all. I'm not sure that this subject warrants an encyclopedia article just yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:25, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete The references are essentially PR, as would be expected for a firm that relies upon PR. When there are decent references, there can perhaps be an article. DGG ( talk ) 00:13, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

CPPSERV

CPPSERV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, per several source searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 02:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:37, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Lalit Prabhakar

Lalit Prabhakar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No apparent indication of notability. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:35, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Box Cricket League

Box Cricket League (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT in the clause "game that is widely considered by independent reliable sources to be notable, outside routine coverage of each game". All references seem to be from PR publications due to involvement of actors. DEPRODed without providing reason by creator who also happens to be an SPA. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:02, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:26, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Bionic Jive

Bionic Jive (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BAND, as per several source searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment: the article is likely all true, as this Billboard article confirms that the band were part of the Anger Management tour. However, it seems to have been written by someone close to the band in a WP:IKNOWIT style, and I'm struggling to find any other sources that might confer notability or back up the details in the text. Richard3120 (talk) 15:13, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete does not appear to pass WP:BAND at this time. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 06:10, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Rockto

Rockto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a seemingly defunct Indonesian tech startup. Most of the cited references and indeed the official site for the company are 404 links. What references remain only assert that the site exist and the depth of coverage doesn't seem to meet WP:CORP. A search for the company on Crunchbase shows only one update: the company's launch in 2011, and nothing since. It's a pity to kill an article about a company from a part of the world that's underrepresented on the EnWiki but I don't think this one can be saved. A Train^talk 07:24, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete -- I'm not able to find anything either. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:38, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:40, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete as it stands without prejudice - David Gerard (talk) 22:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as entirely PR and none of it amounts to substance. SwisterTwister talk 23:10, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Blaccode

Blaccode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable artist who fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 13:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete: The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The subject hasn't been discussed or mentioned in reliable sources. The references currently in the article appear to be self-published sources not independent of the subject.  Versace1608  ^{Wanna Talk?} 01:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor 03:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

ProjectWise

ProjectWise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm still not seeing actually of actual substance, the listed sources are either PR, trivial mentions or simply unacceptable. SwisterTwister talk 16:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 16:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 16:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

• Keep and copy edit. The topic meets WP:GNG, having received significant coverage in reliable book sources. See examples below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

References

• Williams, T. (2007). Information Technology for Construction Managers, Architects and Engineers. Thomson Delmar Learning. pp. 6–17. ISBN 978-1-4180-3958-5. (subscription required)
• Asian Architect and Contractor. Thompson Press Hong Kong. 2003. pp. 146–147.
• Eynon, J. (2016). Construction Manager's BIM Handbook. Wiley. pp. 216– . ISBN 978-1-118-89646-4. (subscription required)
• Eastman, C.; Teicholz, P.; Sacks, R.; Liston, K. (2011). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors. Wiley. pp. 144– . ISBN 978-1-118-02169-9. (subscription required)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

• Keep - Per Northamerica1000's assessment. Aust331 (talk) 07:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
• Keep per above. KGirlTrucker81 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 23:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
• Comment - The votes above seem to be based only from the listed sources above, but this also means they are ignoring why I nominated for AfD, the PROD removal of this was unconvincing; the listed sources are not as substantial as they would need to be. SwisterTwister talk 00:00, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:20, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Nard & B

Nard & B (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BLP and WP:BIO. Little depth of coverage. No awards. This BLPs one source is primary. A search for reliable sources yielded one short secondary source here, and a one sentence mention here and here. They did not write or perform any of these songs listed in the article; they are the record producers. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 13:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 13:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 13:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:57, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Victor Tognola

Victor Tognola (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

completely lacking of citations about the inner claims and affirmations, the page appears to be a subject-promoting page nor neutral or filtered. Nothing is supported by a reference except his profession and other parts seems to have a too much (and un-supported) big emphasis Gin Anmon (talk) 09:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 July 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
• Delete: I added the SwissFilms entry on the subject as a reference but am not finding more substantial coverage of him and his career. The current text is so grotesquely excessive in unsubstantiated superlatives as to need WP:TNT, but if the awards could be verified, and they were further confirmed to be notable in themselves, then there could be a case for a stub article saying just that he is a director of documentaries and commercials and has won X awards. However as things stand, I don't see evidence that he meets the WP:CREATIVE criteria. AllyD (talk) 10:13, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:41, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Hao Xiang Shopping TV

Hao Xiang Shopping TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability of this shopping channel DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. Says it's the "first Chinese language shopping channel in Malaysia" and the "first shopping channel that launches on Malaysian DTT network, MYTV Broadcasting", but no sources to back those claims. Still, it's a non-notable article. — Wyliepedia 04:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

• There is a reliable source for the claims (See here), but these were self-descriptions by the company. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
• For DTT MYTV Broadcasting, many can confirm that there is a presence of it as it was posted on MYTV Broadcasting official Facebook Page and many was able to scan it. However, since they didn't post anywhere other than Facebook, plus that the platform is still on test transmission, and Facebook sources is stated to be less reliable and somewhat cannot be used, so I can't use that source until someone can confirm that source reliablity. (PotfromKP (talk) 06:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC))

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Michael J. Hickey

Michael J. Hickey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Utterly fails WP:NCOLLATH; zero significant coverage in reliable sources found. —swpb^T 12:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

• Delete Even if he had been the head tack coach at Oregon State I am not sure that is enough for notability. However the positions we have with only routine coverage in sports press from the state he was in is not enough.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:14, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:21, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Soulsister Ambassador

Soulsister Ambassador (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems like a very straight forward failing of WP:Music. 4th album by a one-hit wonder, by this point there was no media or fan interest. There's very little trace of this on the internet. nothing significant/independent/reliable. Seems to have not charted in any market either - unless someone can get hold of 12 year old charts and prove me wrong. Has been an unreferenced stub with almost no info for 6 years. Nothing worthy of an encyclopaedia. Rayman60 (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:55, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - Or perhaps redirect to Lutricia McNeal. Meatsgains (talk) 03:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Keith Moor (journalist)

Keith Moor (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CREATIVE as a journalist. The 2 sources provided are articles by the author and do not qualify as actual third party coverage about the subject. No evidence of major awards or peer recognition LibStar (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)'

• What about this - http://old.melbournepressclub.com/news/profiles/keith-moor Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 12:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:38, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:51, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

• Keep. Walkley Awards winner (1986 Print Best Piece of News Reporting Keith Moor Winner The Melbourne Herald. Can be found searching here.) Has two books that have been reviewed in reliable sources. egs [1] [2] Richardson, Owen (21 March 2009). "Crims in Grass Castles: The True Story of Trimbole, Mr Asia and the Disappearance of Donald Mackay". The Age.. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

King Myers

King Myers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD "Nothing convincing for his own notability and substance, no chartings or anything at all, listed sources are either simply for listings or interviews, simply nothing actually convincing at all; searches haven't found anything noticeably better.". but it was actually past PRODed by Joseph2302 so here we are at AfD. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

• Sources He's young, pop singers usually are but he is getting coverage. Sources: New YOrk Daily News describes him as an "up-and-coming rapper" [3], Newsday [4]. Here's Newsday Wyandanch to host 'Village Vibes' free concert series: King Myers[5] describing him as a "rising star" - granted, he's a local boy. And HipHopDX is all over this kid. I'd like to have someone who edits pop music weigh in.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

*Keep subject has notable publications in news — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uneducatedidiot (talk • contribs) 05:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Heathnw77/Archive --Lemongirl942 (talk) 23:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Still none of it is actually suggestive of finally and convincingly establishing his own independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:54, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

• Comment -- Is MTV listing considered as part of sources: MTV? K.e.coffman (talk) 06:50, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

It is, but we would still need better sources. SwisterTwister talk 07:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete This is way too soon. The NYDailyNews is the best source we can get. The Newsday is a local source and a trivial mention talking about a rescheduling of a concern - there's hardly anything about the subject itself. The MTV source mentioned by K.e.coffman is a WP:USERGENERATED source and essentially a directory listing (See disclaimer below This site contains content from artists, fans, and writers from around the internet in it's natural form. Such content is not representative of Viacom Media Networks.. Overall, this is just WP:TOOSOON and a clear delete. I see this essentially as a promotional page for an upcoming artist. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 00:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:TOOSOON; the subject is not yet notable per available sources. When RS take note of the subject's career, an article can be created. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:17, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

The Dave & Chris Show!

The Dave & Chris Show! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article on this obscure program has multiple issues that have not been addressed since they were first raised seven years ago. Research does not find anything to support the subject's notability. And Adoil Descended (talk) 21:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. Internet radio programs are not entitled to an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NMEDIA just because they exist — and the only source cited here is the primary source webpage of the local terrestrial station that purportedly carried it before it went internet, which has been flagged as not even verifying that claim. But what it takes to get something like this into Wikipedia is reliable source coverage about it in media not directly affiliated with it, and none of that has been shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.