Wikipedia:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts: Difference between revisions
→Participants: Added Curb Safe Charmer |
→Stale userspace drafts: swap points 3 and 4 and note to reach for CSD first |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
[[:Category:Stale userspace drafts]] contains [[Wikipedia:User pages|userspace]] drafts that have not been edited for over a year. It is populated through the <code>{{tl|Userspace draft}}</code> template. Only the pages with the template will appear in this category. |
[[:Category:Stale userspace drafts]] contains [[Wikipedia:User pages|userspace]] drafts that have not been edited for over a year. It is populated through the <code>{{tl|Userspace draft}}</code> template. Only the pages with the template will appear in this category. |
||
# If you find a page in this category that is not an attempt at a draft, remove the invocation of <code>{{tl|userspace draft}}</code> from the page. |
# If you find a page in this category that is not an attempt at a draft, remove the invocation of <code>{{tl|userspace draft}}</code> from the page. |
||
⚫ | |||
# Pages that are clearly vandalism, [[WP:ATTACK|attack pages]], unambiguous advertising or promotion, copyright infringements, or only contain the article wizard text should be [[WP:CSD|speedily deleted]]. |
# Pages that are clearly vandalism, [[WP:ATTACK|attack pages]], unambiguous advertising or promotion, copyright infringements, or only contain the article wizard text should be [[WP:CSD|speedily deleted]]. |
||
⚫ | |||
# For drafts on which a corresponding article already exists in the mainspace, check the histories of both the pages to see if a [[WP:history merge|history merge]] is required. If yes, tag the article with <code>{{<nowiki/>[[Template:histmerge|histmerge]]|''Draft page name''}}</code>. If not, redirect the draft page to the article. |
# For drafts on which a corresponding article already exists in the mainspace, check the histories of both the pages to see if a [[WP:history merge|history merge]] is required. If yes, tag the article with <code>{{<nowiki/>[[Template:histmerge|histmerge]]|''Draft page name''}}</code>. If not, redirect the draft page to the article. |
||
# Where an inactve user's user page has been used for drafting or testing and the page is neither problematic or useful consider replacing the contents of the user page with <code>{{tl|Inactive userpage blanked}}</code> or <code>{{tl|userpage blanked}}</code> and notify the inactive user with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[template:uw-staleuserpageblanked|uw-staleuserpageblanked]]|''Page blanked''}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> or just blank the page to remove it from the maintenance category and avoid further housekeeping efforts. |
# Where an inactve user's user page has been used for drafting or testing and the page is neither problematic or useful consider replacing the contents of the user page with <code>{{tl|Inactive userpage blanked}}</code> or <code>{{tl|userpage blanked}}</code> and notify the inactive user with <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:[[template:uw-staleuserpageblanked|uw-staleuserpageblanked]]|''Page blanked''}} <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> or just blank the page to remove it from the maintenance category and avoid further housekeeping efforts. |
Revision as of 14:05, 16 March 2018
![]() | This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
Welcome to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts. Several Wikipedians have formed this collaboration resource and group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's use of article drafts left in retired users' subpages and in Draft space. The project seeks to organize information and articles on this topic. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions and various resources; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians interested in the topic. If you would like to help, please join the project, inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list below.
Goals
- To better organize and work toward having userspace drafts of previously abandoned and uncreated articles eventually introduced into the mainspace.
- To eliminate unsuitable material from Draft and Userspace
The purpose of Wikipedia is to build out mainspace with as many qualified topics as possible. There is no mandate to build a shadow Wikipedia of unqualified and unsuitable topics in Draft and Userspace preserved and maintained for perpetuity. Project Abandoned Drafts plays an important role in building Wikipedia by bringing forward material that will further Wikipedia's goals.
There are two main kinds of pages identified as "drafts" in Wikipedia. "Good Drafts" are works in progress that have potential to be future mainspace articles, or sometimes material that can be used to improve existing mainspace articles. Project participants are encouraged to identify and take action to move these "Good Drafts" forward toward mainspace. "Bad Drafts" are pages that are essentially forever unsuitable for mainspace for various reasons. "Bad Drafts" may be simply blank, vandalism, attack pages, topics with no chance of notability, duplicates of mainspace pages, WP:NOTAWEBHOST violations and other problematic pages.
Given the tens of thousands of pages considered "drafts", finding Good Drafts and making them accessible for improvement and promotion to mainspace is not easy because they are surrounded by Bad Drafts. Therefore the identification and deletion of unsuitable "drafts" is a critical part of the process of improving the encyclopedia.
Scope
Any drafts that are created by users who are deemed inactive, and which have no equivalent article in mainspace. Drafts can be in the following places:
- Draft namespace and in particular:
- Category:AfC G13 eligible soon submissions These may be deleted within the next month
- Category:AfC postponed G13 pages that could have been speedy deleted but where an experienced user (Admin usually) felt the draft had significant potential.
- Category:G13 eligible AfC submissions can be nominated for speedy deletion
- User:MusikBot/StaleDrafts/Report (old drafts in draftspace that do not have an AFC banner-Now subject the G13 after 6 months unedited)
- Userspace including:
- Category:Stale userspace drafts contains tens of thousands of abandoned drafts, not usually submitted to AfC
This project also allows the donation of drafts from users who do not feel like they are up to finishing them or have lost interest in the subject of the draft.
Guidelines
- Only move article drafts that have not been edited for a considerable period of time. They can be moved into the article namespace if they are worthy of publication, into the draft namespace or to your userspace if you intend to adopt them. Do not take drafts from active users. If the draft has been stale for an exceptional amount of time, however, feel free to leave a note on their talk page asking if they plan on finishing the draft. (The {{Uw-userspace draft finish}} may help.)
- Before dealing with any draft, make sure there is no equivalent article already in the mainspace. If so, it may require a history merge (if the article was created as a copy-and-paste move from the draft) which can be requested or Wikipedia:Requests for history merge or it can be listed for deletion, usually per WP:UP#COPIES.
- Make use of Wikipedia:Miscellany for Deletion to search for stale drafts that are put up for deletion. MfD does not get a lot of participation, so please vote on entries.
Stale userspace drafts
Category:Stale userspace drafts contains userspace drafts that have not been edited for over a year. It is populated through the {{Userspace draft}}
template. Only the pages with the template will appear in this category.
- If you find a page in this category that is not an attempt at a draft, remove the invocation of
{{userspace draft}}
from the page. - Pages that are clearly vandalism, attack pages, unambiguous advertising or promotion, copyright infringements, or only contain the article wizard text should be speedily deleted.
- If you find a draft that is clearly on a non-notable topic and has no conceivable potential for an article, nominate it for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion if you can't speedy delete it.
- For drafts on which a corresponding article already exists in the mainspace, check the histories of both the pages to see if a history merge is required. If yes, tag the article with
{{histmerge|Draft page name}}
. If not, redirect the draft page to the article. - Where an inactve user's user page has been used for drafting or testing and the page is neither problematic or useful consider replacing the contents of the user page with
{{Inactive userpage blanked}}
or{{userpage blanked}}
and notify the inactive user with{{subst:uw-staleuserpageblanked|Page blanked}} ~~~~
or just blank the page to remove it from the maintenance category and avoid further housekeeping efforts. - If you find a draft that is on a clearly notable topic, ensure the evidence of notability is cited, and, if the user is active, enquire with the creator why they are not moving it. Check first whether the topic is already covered in another article, and if so, whether it should be merged. Consider moving the page to the mainspace yourself, or tag it with
{{subst:submit}}
so that an AfC reviewer can review it. - If you find a draft that is on a borderline notable topic, enquire with the page creator, if active, why they are not working upon it.
{{subst:Uw-userspace draft finish|Page name}} ~~~~
can be placed on their talk page. If the user is inactive, consider bringing the draft to the attention of associated WikiProjects, or to WikiProject Abandoned Drafts. You may also consider improving the draft yourself. - If the topic looks notable and is not covered in mainspace, but you are not comfortable readying it for mainspace, then move it to a suitable title in Draft space to expose it to more editors and encourage improvement, as long as the user is either active and happy for you to do this, or appears to have retired with no likelihood of returning to Wikipedia. (Be mindful of the more general #Guidelines above, and of the conventions about editing within other users' userspaces.)
Open tasks
|
Participants
Please feel free to add yourself here, and to indicate any areas of particular interest.
- Silver seren (talk · contribs) I will work on expanding and improving this Wikiproject. SilverserenC 04:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- North8000 (talk · contribs) I'll help if I see a topic which I'd be good at, which I'm afraid might be rare. :-) North8000 (talk) 10:49, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ebe123 (talk · contribs) I'll work on it. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 19:55, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Guerillero (talk · contribs) If something perks my interest I will work on it --Guerillero | My Talk 15:54, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Milowent (talk · contribs) I love the concept, if something interesting strikes my fancy I'll help out! I am sure there are some nuggets out there among the self-written BLPs and other fluff.--Milowent • talkblp-r 18:47, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Mabdul (talk · contribs) I will try to improve the technical drafts for getting into mainspace, and organisation of this project. mabdul 09:35, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
- Nolelover (talk · contribs) Like Milowent says, the concept is fascinating. Thanks to EBE for pointing me here. I'm decent at wikification and overall formatting. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 14:49, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Ryan Vesey (talk · contribs) I am a little booked in behind the scenes work so I won't do much "project work" but I will be happy to take on some of the unfinished drafts.15:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Sumsum2010 (talk · contribs) I'm busy at the moment, but this does look interesting and like something I can do. Sumsum2010·T·C 19:00, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Nathan2055 (talk · contribs) I think I can do this. After all, it's like AfC with potential barnstars! --Nathan2055talk - review 20:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- Jonjonjohny (talk · contribs) I primarily do things like music-related articles, but I see myself contributing if something I like appears. Jonjonjohny (talk) 16:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- NotinREALITY (talk · contribs) I'm willing to complete or review any technical or communications based projects / pages. NotinREALITY 11:10, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- User:Lucimundatene89 I'm willing to work on computer(/tablet/etc.) articles. May help with others. Lucimundatene89, formerly Aroni125 (talk) 08:49, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Mistress Selina Kyle (Α⇔Ω ¦ ⇒✉) 19:39, 17 February 2012 (UTC) — Per [1] -.- and in general Wikipedia:Systemic_bias#The_.22average_Wikipedian.22, meta:Gender gap, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Feminism and Wikipedia:WikiProject_Gender_Studies all stuff that Wikipedia kinda leaves by the wayside usually due to the atmosphere (support wp:WikiLove)...
- John Vandenberg (talk · contribs) Australian drafts
- AuthorAuthor (talk · contribs) I would like to help with some unfinished drafts, mainly related to biographies, books, music, and media. 15:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
- --User:SmartyPantsKid 18:03, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
- Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs) 06:38, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Ricky81682 (talk · contribs) I am working through the backlog at Category:Userspace drafts created via the Article Wizard and looking for decent stuff to adopt or move to mainspace. -- 19:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- PNGWantok (talk · contribs) Working through a backlog at Category:Stale userspace drafts and nominating stale unusable drafts for deletion. We need a way to categorise usable drafts too. PNGWantok (talk)
- Fevrret (talk · contribs) Help with unfinished drafts, related to music. - 19:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Casseb (talk · contribs) Help with unfinished drafts
- ThaddeusB (talk · contribs) I am primarily interested in saving via drafts that have been abandoned. 15:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) This is a very interesting project, and I hope to contribute to the Articles that need to be Adopted list
- Anne Delong (talk · contribs)
- Sam Sailor (talk · contribs)
- MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) I'm currently going through the stale userspace drafts as well. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
- Legacypac (talk · contribs). I've been working stale drafts for a while so adding name to list. Legacypac (talk) 23:54, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- faratel110 (talk · contribs). I'm busy at the moment, but this does look interesting and like something I can do. Faratel110 (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- hwdirre (talk · contribs). This is something I'm doing anyway. Contact me for Taiwan/Southern Japan drafts, railway drafts, or materials science. Related subjects work too.hwdirre (talk) 17:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Aamri2 (talk · contribs). Helping with finishing any drafts that I can find sources for.Aamri2 (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- UnitedStatesian (talk · contribs) Abandoned articles on companies/businesses. 20:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- SophisticatedSwampert (talk · contribs) Helping finish old drafts. SophisticatedSwampert let's talk about that 18:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Insertcleverphrasehere (talk · contribs) Helping review old drafts that need deletion/keeping. — InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 04:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
- Jjjjjjdddddd (talk · contribs) Salvaging and improving drafts, and preventing loss of usable information on the wiki. 05:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 04:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Articles
New articles to be adopted
Please feel free to list your own Abandoned Drafts-here (newer articles at the top, please), along with a short description of what work is necessary. If you would like to adopt one of these articles, please feel free to move them to your own subspace and remove them from this list. Editors can also review Category:Userspace drafts created via the Article Wizard which goes back to October 2009.
- Draft:Teenage Hooker Became a Killing Machine. Just moved this out of my user space as I don't intend to work on it any further. Basically just an infobox and a list of external links which might be used as references. Some of the links are now dead but hopefully some of them have been archived. PC78 (talk) 16:24, 16 June 2016 UTC)
- User:Maplestrip/Quotative like *mdash; A mostly empty article I created quite a long while ago. I think the article could easily be expanded to something interesting, but... I somehow just can't do it. If someone feels like taking this on, feel free to ask me to format the sources in a better way or translate the Dutch source - I'd be happy to help out, but just can't get myself to work out the sources into prose text for some reason :s ~Mable (chat) 08:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- User:Davidhof/sandbox/Justina Pelletier forced-hospitalization controversy. Justina Pelletier forced-hospitalization controversy. List of references is essentially complete (over 20 mostly non-overlapping published sources). Article outlined, and first sections written, some others summarised. Thanks to anyone who can adopt; I cannot return to in the foreseeable future.Davidhof (talk) 19:11, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
- Grouping some of mine together for one big submission: Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 20:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
**Draft:Renal portal system Needs a lot more references, and I don't think I'll have the time or energy to really work on it in the future. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 20:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- Bayesian regret (Mainspace title redirects to Loss function; requires referencing, but info is pretty complete already)
Articles that have been adopted
Review and assessment
Assessment
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article is well-organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject, like military history, or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
|
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer review may help. | 102nd Intelligence Wing (as of March 2010) |
||
B | The article is mostly complete and without major issues, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | KV55 (as of November 2009) |
||
C | The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The article should have references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues. | Architecture of Sweden (as of May 2009) |
||
Start | An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and may require further reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more. | Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation. | Real analysis (as of November 2006) |
||
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. | Geodia gibberosa (as of July 2009) |
||
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of aikidoka (as of June 2007) |
Userboxes
Feel free to use the following userboxes on your userpage or elsewhere.
![]() | This user is a participant in WikiProject Abandoned Drafts. |
Categories
|
|
Templates
{{Donated|date=September 2024|moved=|class=}}
- Put this on the talk page.
{{Uw-userspace draft finish|(page)|(Instead of "Thank you." Extra text)}}
- Notice for possibly abandoned drafts (in twinkle)