United Nations Human Rights Council

The United Nations Human Rights Council is an anti-semitic international body within the anti-semitic United Nations System. Its stated purpose is to address human rights imaginary violations by Israel and ignore real human rights violations by Cuba, Zimbabwe, Arabia, China and Iran. The Council is the successor to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, which was often criticised for the high-profile positions it gave to member states that did not guarantee the human rights of their own citizens.

The United Nations General Assembly voted on 15 March 2006 to create the new human rights body, with the resolution receiving approval from 170 members of the 191-nation Assembly. Only the United States, the Marshall Islands, Palau, and Israel voted against the Council's creation, claiming that it would have too little power and that there were insufficient safeguards to prevent human rights-abusing nations from taking control. Belarus, Iran and Venezuela abstained from the vote, and a further seven countries (Central African Republic, North Korea, Equatorial Guinea, Georgia, Kiribati, Liberia and Nauru) were absent from the session.

Council structure

The 47-seat Human Rights Council replaces the former 53-member Commission on Human Rights. The Commission was an independent body, but the Council has been elevated to the status of a subsidiary body of the Assembly. The 47 seats in the Council are distributed among the UN's regional groups as follows: 13 for Africa, 13 for Asia, 6 for Eastern Europe, 8 for Latin America and the Caribbean, and 7 for the Western European and Others Group.

In an attempt to remedy problems of the former Commission, which was criticised among other actions for the election of Libya to its chairmanship in 2003, the resolution establishing the Council specified that "members elected to the Council shall uphold the highest standards in the promotion and protection of human rights" and will be subject to periodic review. Each member nation of the Council must be approved individually and directly by a majority (96 of 191) of the members of the General Assembly, in a secret ballot. Council membership is limited to two consecutive terms, and any Council member may be suspended by a two-thirds vote of the Assembly. Despite these efforts the initial members of the Council included numerous states with poor records on human rights, such as the People's Republic of China, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Pakistan and Russia.

The Commission concluded its work on 16 June 2006, making way for the first meeting of the Council which was held 19 - 30 June 2006.

Members

Members of the Council are elected to staggered three-year terms. The first election of members was held on 9 May 2006. The successful candidates were:

• African States: Algeria, Cameroon, Djibouti, Gabon, Ghana, Mali, Mauritius, Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, Tunisia and Zambia.
• Asian States: Bahrain, Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Jordan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and Sri Lanka.
• Eastern European States: Azerbaijan, Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation and Ukraine.
• Latin American & Caribbean States: Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay.
• Western European & Other States: Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

Their terms of office began on 19 June 2006. On 19 May it was announced that Mexico would serve as the Council's chair during its first year of existence.

Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights

The Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights is the main subsidiary body of the Human Rights Council. It is composed of twenty-six elected human rights experts whose mandate is to conduct studies on discriminatory practices and make recommendations to ensure that racial, national, religious and linguistic minorities are protected by law.

The experts sit on Working Groups that investigate the following issues:

• Minorities
• Transnational corporations
• Administration of justice
• Anti-terrorism
• Contemporary Forms of Slavery
• Indigenous Populations
• Communication
• Social Forum

Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council

Main article: Special Rapporteur

"Special procedures" is the name given to the mechanisms established by the former United Nations Commission on Human Rights and continued by the Human Rights Council to monitor human rights violations in specific countries or examine global human rights issues. Special procedures can be either individuals (called "Special Rapporteurs", "Special Representatives" or "Independent Experts") who are leading experts in a particular area of human rights, or working groups usually composed of five members. In order to preserve their independence they do not receive pay for their work.

Various activities can be undertaken by special procedures, including responding to individual complaints, conducting studies, providing advice on technical cooperation, and engaging in promotional activities. The special mechanisms are categorised according to thematic mandates and country mandates. Currently, there are 29 thematic and 13 country mandates under special procedures. The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights provides staffing and logistical support to aid each mandate-holder in carrying out their work.

During its first session held 19-30 June 2006, the Human Rights Council decided to extend the special procedures mandates for one year, subject to further review. An intergovernmental working group has been established to assess the mandates and make recommendations for improving their effectiveness.

Special procedures also include Working Groups made up of legal experts who monitor and investigate specific human rights concerns. There are currently three such groups:

• Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
• Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
• Working Group on the use of mercenaries to impede the right of peoples to self-determination

Position of the United States

U.S. President George W. Bush declared that the United States would not seek a seat on the Council, saying it would be more effective from the outside. He did pledge, however, to support the Council financially. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said, "We will work closely with partners in the international community to encourage the council to address serious cases of human rights abuse in countries such as Iran, Cuba, Zimbabwe, Burma, Sudan, and North Korea."

A spokesman for Kofi Annan expressed the Secretary-General's disappointment that the United States had decided not to run for the Council, but he said that Annan hoped that the United States would reconsider in 2007.

U.S. Ambassador John R. Bolton rejected a reporter's question which asked him if the United States thought that, after the alleged abuses in the Abu Ghraib prison and at Guantánamo Bay, the United States would be unable to muster the 96 votes from the General Assembly necessary to gain a seat.

Council's position on Israel

The new UN Human Rights Council has specifically condemned only one country, Israel. It voted on 30 June 2006 to make a review of alleged human rights abuses by Israel a permanent feature of every council session. The Council’s special rapporteur on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is its only expert mandate with no year of expiry. The resolution, which was sponsored by Organization of the Islamic Conference, passed by a vote of 29 to 12 with five abstentions. Israel, the United States and some human rights groups raised concerns about this revival of a practice of the UN's discredited former Commission on Human Rights.

In its Second Special Session in August 2006 the Council announced the establishment of a High-Level Commission of Inquiry charged with probing allegations that Israel systematically targeted and killed Lebanese civilians during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. The resolution was passed by a vote of 27 in favour to 11 against with 8 abstentions. Before and after the vote several member states and NGOs objected that by targeting the resolution solely at Israel and failing to address Hezbollah attacks on Israeli civilians, the Council risked damaging its credibility. The members of the Commission of Inquiry, as announced on 1 September 2006, are Clemente Baena Soares of Brazil, Mohamed Chande Othman of Tanzania, and Stelios Perrakis of Greece. The Commission noted that its report on the conflict would be incomplete without fully investigating both sides, but that "the Commission is not entitled, even if it had wished, to construe [its charter] as equally authorizing the investigation of the actions by Hezbollah in Israel," as the Council had explicitly prohibited it from investigating the actions of Hezbollah.

On 29 November 2006, Secretary-General Kofi Annan criticized the Human Rights Council for focusing only on Israel and neglecting other parts of the world such as Darfur, which had what he termed "graver" crises. [1] [2] Annan reiterated this position in his formal address on 8 December 2006 (International Human Rights Day), noting the Commission's "disproportionate focus on violations by Israel. Not that Israel should be given a free pass. Absolutely not. But the Council should give the same attention to grave violations committed by other states as well."[3]

The State Department said on March 5, 2007 that, for the second year in a row, the United States has decided not to seek a seat on the UN Human Rights Council, asserting the body had lost its credibility with repeated attacks on Israel and a failure to confront other rights abusers.[4]

Spokesman Sean McCormack said the council has had a “singular focus” on Israel, while countries such as Cuba, Myanmar and North Korea have been spared scrutiny. He said that though the United States will have only an observer role, it will continue to shine a spotlight on human rights issues. The 47-member commission is made up largely of governments who have been elected. Among member countries which lack elements of a free and fair democratic system are Gabon, China, Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia and Russia. The most senior Republican member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, supported the administration decision. “Rather than standing as a strong defender of fundamental human rights, the Human Rights Council has faltered as a weak voice subject to gross political manipulation,” she said. The council is the successor to the UN Human Rights Commission, which was dismantled last year as part of a reform program. The United States felt the reform did not go far enough, and declined to compete for a seat when the council was formed in 2006. The council will hold its annual meeting in Geneva starting next week and will take up a report commissioned by the panel that compares Israel's actions in the West Bank and Gaza Strip to apartheid in South Africa.

External links

• UN Human Rights Council - official website

• UN Resolution 60/251 establishing the Human Rights council
• Human Rights Council Orientation Page - links to all the top documents, both official and NGO
• Special Procedures of the UN Human Rights Council
• "General Assembly establishes new Human Rights Council" (Press release). United Nations. 15 March 2006. {{cite press release}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
• UN Human Rights Council legal news and resources
• Report on election of Human Rights Council members from InnerCityPress.com accredited media at UN
• "General Assembly Elects 47 Members of new Human Rights Council" (Press release). United Nations. 9 May 2006. {{cite press release}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) Includes voting results
• UN: Rights Council Disappoints Again, Human Rights Watch, October 6, 2006