Talk:Sexuality in Islam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:17, 14 December 2023

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sexuality in Islam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 12 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Islam B‑class Top‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Religion B‑class Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Theology B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law B‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Crime and Criminal Biography B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sexology and sexuality B‑class Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Gender studies B‑class Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

LGBTQ+ studies B‑class

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women B‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women's Health B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pornography B‑class Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Human rights B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to abortion, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Colgate University/Islamic Jurisprudence (Spring 2013) -- Aisha Musa" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

This article was nominated for merging with Sex with reference to the Quran on 23 October 2015. The result of the discussion was delete the other page.

Islam and masturbation was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 5 June 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Sexuality in Islam. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Archives

Index 1, 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

This article was selected as the article for improvement on 3 October 2022 for a period of one week.

Intercourse with jinns

It seems like this article has plenty to discuss already without wandering off into the mythological. I suggest that this material on jinns be moved to the page on jinns and that this article remain focused on the topic at hand, which is, I believe, for the sake of clarity, Islamic legal rulings pertaining to realistic and tangible sexual scenarios in human society (in the material world). Iskandar323 (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 April 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Sexuality in Islam per nom. No such user (talk) 12:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Islamic sexual jurisprudence → Sexuality in Islam – This article title is more than a little odd. It gives the impression of being some sort of common name, but these three words have almost zero currency as a set phrase in academic literature. I got exactly 11 Google Scholar hits for it. At the same time, it is an unnatural and unconcise descriptive title. Sexuality in Islam, which currently redirects to it, would be a far better descriptive title. It would also parallel and be consistent with titles such as Sexuality in Judaism and Christianity and sexuality. That the article entails some discussion of Islamic jurisprudence is inherently implied by the fact that we are talking about sexuality in Islam which has a body of religious law covering most aspects of daily life; it does not really need to be said out loud in the article title, which should be focused on delivering recognizability. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Of the points at WP:AT the new title would boost recognizability, naturalness, concision (negligibly), and consistency (per Iskandar323). The article already does, and should continue to, address non-jurisprudential aspects of sex and sexuality in Islamic contexts, so the proposed title is more precise. Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) 02:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agreee Uzhan123 (talk) 01:22, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

P.S. After the move I removed the following paragraph from the lead, that I was unable to find a suitable place for. I find it overly bloated with wikilinks, and value of Arabic translations is questionable, since both the previous and the current are mere descriptive titles in both English and Arabic. I'm dumping it here if anyone wants to reintegrate it somewhere or reuse the references. No such user (talk) 12:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Extended content

Islamic sexual jurisprudence (Template:Lang-ar, Arabic pronunciation: [fiqhu'l dʒin'siːu'l ʔis'laːmiː] or Template:Lang-ar, Arabic pronunciation: [fiqhu'n nikah]) is a part of family,^[1] marital,^[2] hygienical^[3] and criminal jurisprudence^[4]^[5] of Islam that concerns the

User:Uzhan123 this account has only one contribution following suspection as a sockpuppet. Lavito principa (talk) 18:50, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Mallat, Chibli; Connors, Jane Frances (1990). Islamic Family Law. Brill. pp. 55, 58, 60, 62, 63, 64. ISBN 978-1-85333-301-9. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
^ Cohn-Sherbok, Dan; Chryssides, George D.; El-Alami, Dawoud (2013). Love, Sex and Marriage: Insights from Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Hymns Ancient and Modern Ltd. pp. XX, 88, 182, 196. ISBN 978-0-334-04405-5.
^ Khan, Muhammad Aftab (2006). Sex & Sexuality in Islam. Nashriyat. p. 296. ISBN 978-969-8983-04-8. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
^ Warren, Christie S. (2010). Islamic Criminal Law: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 10, 11, 12. ISBN 978-0-19-980604-1. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
^ Zia, Afiya Shehrbano (1994). Sex Crime in the Islamic Context: Rape, Class and Gender in Pakistan. ASR. pp. 7, 9, 32. ISBN 978-969-8217-23-5. Retrieved 26 May 2020.

The state of this article

This move from a year ago seems to have worsened a problem with this article (pinging @Iskandar323 and @Firefangledfeathers for this reason); it treats "Islamic legal discourse/fiqh" as equivalent to "Islam". This is a fairly frequent problem, but in a high-exposure article like this, it is unacceptable; this article is not about sexuality in Islam; LGBT people and Islam does a better job at that despite being of a different scope. This is about the classical fiqh-related opinions on sexuality. That is not coextensive with Islam (or Muslims) of any period, and in some periods legalistic opinions were actively marginalized in many contexts. This is a grave issue of systemic bias, and in my opinion is enough to draftify an article if it was not so highly-viewed, but right now another move or rewrite might be in order. Uness232 (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Uness232: Perhaps. I take your point about the greater specificity of the current content. I still don't like the prior title, but how does Sexuality in Islamic jurisprudence sound? Iskandar323 (talk) 19:43, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem like a major problem to me that an article about "Sexuality in Religion" is about that religion's teachings about sexuality. LGBT people and Islam is a discrete topic, but maybe a hatnote would be in order, based on the multiple possible meanings of "sexuality". I agree that the article needs some expansion, and I particularly would love to see Uness232 add some content on the legalistic opinions that were marginalized, or remove some content if it's so marginal that it's undue. I don't think would be warranted; I understand that wasn't really on the table, but just saying. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 22:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative is that this page be renamed to reflect its current more specific scope and then "Sexuality in Islam" could be created as a parent for this, LGBT and Islam and other content. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Firefangledfeathers: The problem is that Islam (much like Christianity and Judaism) does not have one coherent body of interpretation on many things; sexuality included. While classical faqihs would probably agree with most of the interpretation of this article, in many periods these rulings were simply not carried out or respected by the general public. Ubayd Zakani's gay-lovers-on-a-mosque, sexually-explicit songs being performed in front of government apparatus (see for. ex. Saçbağı Takar Başına, or Gelibolu'da Bir Gelin), or the wealth of supposedly "illicit" material on bahnâmes, could not be widely produced in even the most secular countries of today's Muslim world without censorship or crackdowns; though they were done so half a millennium ago. The most correct title for this page then, would be 'Sexuality in classical Islamic jurisprudence', but that seems unwieldy, and @Iskandar323's suggestion seems to be the best alternative.

An even better thing to do would be to just start over on this article, but that simply doesn't seem realistic. Uness232 (talk) 13:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree that there is such a problem with the article, among many others. I just think it can be improved as is. The content you propose to add about e.g. sexually-explicit songs would not fit in an article that is just about jurisprudence. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:25, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware, and an article on traditional Islamic jurisprudence should not include historical non-legalistic realities. I am contrasting two things; if this is a Sexuality in Islam article, then it should include those, if it isn't and is about jurisprudence, it shouldn't, but it should be titled accordingly. Uness232 (talk) 15:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article already includes some non-jurisprudential content, and more can be added. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:41, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But it is mainly jurisprudential content isn't it? Absorbing Uness232's critique, I see two paths forward: either we juice the jurisprudential content out into a Sexuality in Islamic jurisprudence child article, OR, we rename this page and construct a new "Sexuality in Islam" parent above this and other pages such as LGBT people and Islam, removing non-jurisprudential content to the parent, and summarizing the jurisprudential content there. If, for the sake of argument, we suggest that jurisprudential content is the majority of the content here, the latter is more pragmatic; if not, then perhaps the contrary is more pragmatic. But I think the process of teasing the two apart would be productive. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:15, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not against the existence of a parent-child article structure like the one you propose. That said, much of the proposed content to be added would still need to be added to an article focused solely on jurisprudence. It still needs to talk about which laws or legal opinions were marginalized, and how Islamic cultures have accepted/ignored/re-interpreted the laws. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:43, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sexuality in Islam

@VenusFeuerFalle: Your recent edits on transgender and intersex issues of the articles only reflects the liberal view of the topic, not conservative views, thus it is not balanced and partial, you have removed many conservative references and added liberals, you didn't do the balance between the two views, you are betraying with the neutrality. Also seeking attention of User:TheAafi. Also check changes after this version. 202.134.14.156 (talk) 17:16, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "Liberal vs conservative"-view beyond post-modern culture. I merely showed that sources actually say. VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 17:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You just showed the sources that legalised transsexual issues, not the resources that restricted and forbide it, thus this is clear partiality and deviation of neutral point of view. 202.134.14.156 (talk) 17:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

202.134.14.156, I'm sorry to drive-by reply on someone else's talk page here, but—seeking their attention for what? Mind your business. Remsense留 17:44, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are playing a game of partiality on a topic using wikipedia and no one can attention to the matter? how weird is that? Can you change the XY sex-determination system of human which is present in every cell of a human, yet it is not discovered. Thus transgender surgeries does't help to produce the opposite reproductive cell or gamete because every cell's xy/xx gene system of the body denies to do it given by God. Ancient texts of the time of prophet Muhammad (pbuh) never allowed such kind of acts, let alone the operations, he used to send the exile from the society. You are just deforming their reproductive system, which is never allowed in the texts of Quran and Muhammad (pbuh). 202.134.14.156 (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am unsure if I have ever significantly edited on this article. I find myself a nobody to offer an opinion on this because this is not the field of which I have any significant knowledge. I am sorry. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

However, it would be better to use the article's talk page and state what issues you have with it, and what reliable and verifiable sources support "the balance" that you are talking about. (Note: I have not been through this article) ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:06, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

if you are avoiding the issue willingly to keep yourself safe in wikipedia, then you will be accountable to Allah for it in akhirat, Aafi. You have read in deoband and I know you have obviously read the courses of fiqhun nikah very well, and obviously in original arabic text. And you know, Allah don't forgive someone for any obligatory deed, for which he has ability to do it.202.134.14.156 (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have not studied at Deoband and I am not someone well-versed on this topic either, to speak about. I have been contributing to my subject of interest since 2019 (biographies, institutions, books etc) and I explicitly speak where I have knowledge. ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you do me a favor and shift such private discussions to another place than my talkpage, just in case you really want to engage with an overly zealous anyonymous fanatic who proposes threats by emotional and religious oppression(I would't even agree to discuss someone like that). However, I would love to not have my notifications filled with each reply of that the emotional rant of such people. VenusFeuerFalle (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No one is zealous, it is a matter of fear that your non-neutral partial information can lead innocent muslims to astray. You are explaining one religion wrongly and pertially, you yourself are opressing ("muslim") people with trick and falsehood and gaming of information in the name of a "Muslim" yourself and then you are calling me a fanatic threating by emotional and religious oppression? The worst ever hypocricy.202.134.14.156 (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then who is that person in this link? Jamia Millia Islamia daora-e hadith obviously offers fiqhun nikah under the deobandi qaomi curriculum.(202.134.14.156 (talk)

@A. B. and Liz: 202.134.14.156 (talk) 18:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

seeking attention about the recent changes and difference between present version and this version and check them with concentration that, a lot of important citatations have been removed where the article was just near to perfectly completed and resourced then. 202.134.14.156 (talk) 19:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know I was pinged to this talk page. I have no opinion regarding Islam and Sexuality. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 19:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

venus is just doing that thing. 202.134.14.156 (talk) 19:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Mallat, Chibli; Connors, Jane Frances (1990). Islamic Family Law. Brill. pp. 55, 58, 60, 62, 63, 64. ISBN 978-1-85333-301-9. Retrieved 26 May 2020.

[2] Cohn-Sherbok, Dan; Chryssides, George D.; El-Alami, Dawoud (2013). Love, Sex and Marriage: Insights from Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Hymns Ancient and Modern Ltd. pp. XX, 88, 182, 196. ISBN 978-0-334-04405-5.

[3] Khan, Muhammad Aftab (2006). Sex & Sexuality in Islam. Nashriyat. p. 296. ISBN 978-969-8983-04-8. Retrieved 26 May 2020.

[4] Warren, Christie S. (2010). Islamic Criminal Law: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide. Oxford University Press, USA. pp. 10, 11, 12. ISBN 978-0-19-980604-1. Retrieved 26 May 2020.

[5] Zia, Afiya Shehrbano (1994). Sex Crime in the Islamic Context: Rape, Class and Gender in Pakistan. ASR. pp. 7, 9, 32. ISBN 978-969-8217-23-5. Retrieved 26 May 2020.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 ::seeking attention about the recent changes and difference between present version and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sexuality_in_Islam&diff=prev&oldid=972293893 this version] and check them with concentration that, a lot of important citatations have been removed where the article was just near to perfectly completed and resourced then. [[Special:Contributions/202.134.14.156|202.134.14.156]] ([[User talk:202.134.14.156|talk]]) 19:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
 :::I don't know I was pinged to this talk page. I have no opinion regarding Islam and Sexuality. --<span class="nowrap"><span style="font-family:Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]]  •  [[Special:CentralAuth/A._B.|global count]])</sup></span></span> 19:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
+::: venus is just doing [https://m.youtube.com/watch?si=01YENyg0kcoGp31N&v=eYQtGEzTYKE& that thing]. [[Special:Contributions/202.134.14.156|202.134.14.156]] ([[User talk:202.134.14.156|talk]]) 19:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)