Jump to content

User talk:Keilana: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 68.97.55.75 (talk) to last version by Awadewit
Llamafish (talk | contribs)
→‎RE: Grove Park: new section
Line 262: Line 262:


I finally got around to doing a peer review of [[history of timekeeping devices]]. I posted it [[Wikipedia:Peer review/History of timekeeping devices/archive2|here]]. I hope it is helpful! [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] ([[User talk:Awadewit|talk]]) 17:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
I finally got around to doing a peer review of [[history of timekeeping devices]]. I posted it [[Wikipedia:Peer review/History of timekeeping devices/archive2|here]]. I hope it is helpful! [[User:Awadewit|Awadewit]] ([[User talk:Awadewit|talk]]) 17:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

== RE: Grove Park ==

Thanks for that!

I thought there was nothing wrong with it, but you never know!

You probably reverted it just as I was correcting the 300px thing, so it was missed


cheers,

Dan

[[User:Llamafish|Llamafish]] ([[User talk:Llamafish|talk]]) 10:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:11, 22 April 2008

I have been known under a previous name, but changed names under the Right to Vanish. Please do not mention that name on my talk page, I would like to keep it private.
Welcome to my talk page!
  • I will probably respond to messages here.
  • If you have a grievance with me, please remain civil and be kind, and I will respond in kind.
  • Please post new messages at the bottom.
  • Thank you!



Brainburst deletion

Was wondering about the deletion of the Brainburst entry. You wrote "Web content; doesn't indicate importance/significance." I am confused, as I thought the entry did exactly that. Unfortunately, I did not expect it to be deleted so quickly and I was not able to capture the source code (and if you could guide me to where I could get the source code so that I may take it to the Drawing Board forum, I would appreciate it).

Can you explain to me how it was not notable? I would like to know what I did wrong so that future entries can adhere to the wikipedia notability standards.

Thanks.

Drbing2000 (talk) 07:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monobook Blank ASAP

Can you please blank my monobook? I cannot log in with RyRy5 if the codes are there. BTW, this is User:RyRyBot.--RyRy5 Talk to RyRy? 17:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note on reversion

Just to let you know, your revision ([1]) to Gareth Thomas (rugby player) reverted a vandalism revert (reintroducing the vandalism). AlexJ (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Migrated thread

Why did you just delete Love Systems? I was just going to put up the link to the Dr Phil show that everyone was asking for. I'm following the directions - get more notable references - and the page with Nick Savoy which had the exact same issue was just voted to be kept. Camera123456 (talk) 23:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC) (Transcribed by —Animum (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

April GA Newsletter

The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Love Systems page

Thanks for responding on my talk page! It's great to see a polite admin :)

Anyway, I'm surprised you saw a consensus to delete on that page, but that's not really the point. People said they would switch if someone produced important 3rd party sources. In addition to CBS national radio and Fox News and Keys to the VIP, I had just found that morning that Love Systems is featured on April 11th on the Dr Phil show (an extremely well-known US TV show). I was about to add that to the record.

Is there any way to reopen the debate with that information? I'd hate to see all my work having gone to waste.

Best Camera123456 (talk) 23:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


      • SUBSEQUENT UPDATE (APRIL 10) ***

Thanks for your comments on my talk page. Yes, please restore the Love Systems page. I'd like to add the extra sources and then try again.

However, another situation happened - the Nick Savoy page was approved and then deleted. Even though even the "negative" posters agreed that it could be kept (see my talk page).

I worked really hard on these and I believe they are backed up by third party sources (The Dr Phil show, Keys to the VIP, CBS national, Fox Regional, The Globe and Mail, etc.)

Is there an admin I can work with to do this properly, without inviting abuse? :)

Camera123456 (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

      • THANKS ***

Thanks for restoring the article. Were you able to restore both? And how do I get to where they are? Final question (and I'm truly grateful for your patience) - there's an admin who just has it in for anythign I write and has repeatedly accused me of being or operating a dozen or so sock puppets without evidence...is there a procedure to work with a (different) admin to try to respectfully build a page and avoid one admin's vendetta? (I'm not the only one he's targetted; his talk page is full of people complaining about him). I'm newish here and he's just been ambushing me. Camera123456 (talk) 23:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

      • REPLY ***

Yes, please if I could have both pages so I can repost them when that admin stops stalking me and accusing me of being everyone's sock puppet. That admin is Rhaworth - check out his talk page (and mine). I don't know if he has a political agenda (the topic is very political) but it feels like it. I don't want to change wikipedia rules I just want to be able to operate fairly and without being stalked. IS there anything I can do or anyone I can appeal to? Or is it a king-of-the-hill kind of thing and I just have to wait until he gets bored? Camera123456 (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On 8 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article History of timekeeping devices in Egypt, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! · AndonicO Hail! 23:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm afraid I'm currently too busy to take on any more review requests at this time. Good luck with the article, though! – Scartol • Tok 01:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Nomination for Harry Potter

Hi there!

Just to let you know that I have nominated Harry Potter for GA, and it is currently being reviewed. For more information on the review, please see Talk:Harry_Potter#GA_Review.

Thanks,

The Helpful One (Review) 16:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again (better late than never)

Hey Keilana, I want to thank you again for taking the time to admin coach me, it really helped me gain my confidence back with the tools. If you ever need my assistance please let me know, and I'll try my best to help. With my kindest regards. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my! I haven't done peer review in a long long time, but I'll take a look at it. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

Although your deletion of the cabals was what I refer to as a "stupid" action considering it was not only against policy but a just set consensus, my proposal isn't just about that incident. It's about all such incidents, I just cited the most recent two. LaraLove 00:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prem Rawat protection

Hi, you protected Prem Rawat article, but did not place the appropriate tag. Please do so. Mukadderat (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence § t/e 17:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chaps mediation

Just an FYI that I have weighed in, finally. You may want to touch bases over there before we all start just spatting again, and let us know if you want additional information, etc. Montanabw(talk) 04:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you weigh in on our current mediation? Thanks Montanabw(talk) 22:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have a look at this by any chance?

I was speaking to my admin coach, User:MBisanz, about having an article I'm improving rated. He recommended you, but I don't want to bother you too much. But, if you could, would you be able to have a look at the Martha Logan article, and rate it? If it's not too much trouble. I'd really appreciate it. :) Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 08:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Keilana. You have new messages at Steve Crossin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Keilana. You have new messages at Steve Crossin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RFA Thanks

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. --Sharkface217 19:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with the Simon Amstell page

Rachel Summers (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA...

Thank you...
...for your participation in my RFA, which closed with 85 supports, 2 neutrals and 1 oppose. I'm extremely grateful for all the the kind comments from so many brilliant Wikipedians I've come to respect and admire, as well as many others I've not yet had the pleasure of working with, and I'll do my best to put my shiny new mop and bucket to good use! Once again, thank you. "Absolute support"... I don't know what to say ;)
EyeSerenetalk 16:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hey, I finally had my talk page vandalized, and you fixed it for me, I appreciate that.Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add User:ComputerGuy890100/Cabals to the list? ComputerGuy890100Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 23:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ComputerGuy890100Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 23:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have closed the DRV. No consensus was found to endorse your deletions, and you are so informed - this was not a particularly good application of WP:IAR. However, there is also not a consensus to restore the pages. To the extent there is a consensus, it is a consensus to use individual judgment. I've laid out in the DRV closure the path by which individual judgment is to be applied for this set of pages. GRBerry 15:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 20

Thanks for deleting the latest attempt to add this new Birth. I undid two attempts yesterday by this user (from IP address 74.56.89.213) and put a comment on the user's talk page indicating that he would continue to be deleted. Not sure what we do from here. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for being willing to deal with vandals so quickly! Jsmith86 (talk) 00:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost

April Fools' pranks result in temporary blocks for six admins WikiWorld: "Apples and oranges" 
News and notes: 100 x 5,000, milestones Wikipedia in the News 
Dispatches: Reviewers achieving excellence Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor 
Interview with the team behind one of the 2,000th featured articles Image placeholders debated 
WikiWorld: "Pet skunk" News and notes: Board meeting, milestones 
Wikipedia in the News Dispatches: Featured article milestone 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Colin Belyea

Well done catching the vandalism on the "Ban" article - Colin Belyea is impressed!

Shall we be rivals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.187.17 (talk) 03:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism on my talk page

thank you kindly--Pewwer42  Talk  03:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

for the deletion of it, that is--Pewwer42  Talk  03:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your new best friend!

Oh look, how nice. Cant you just feel the love? Tiptoety talk 03:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I smell a previous cabal operator out for revenge. Equazcion /C 03:28, 18 Apr 2008 (UTC)
Yay. He's wrong about one thing, that block button is mighty handy... Equazcion, he's this vandal I've been reverting lately, I doubt anyone's connected to the cabal people. Keilana|Parlez ici 03:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Equazcion /C 03:31, 18 Apr 2008 (UTC)
I didn't even know you could make that symbol in text....who wrote the Alt codes?(they should be fired)--Pewwer42  Talk  03:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering about those too. Rather strange that that'd be included in web fonts. I can't imagine why anyone would ever need it as a typable character, aside from uses such as this. Equazcion /C 03:43, 18 Apr 2008 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure a use like this is "needed" maybe they made it so people could write WWII scripts for movies or plays?--Pewwer42  Talk  03:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, nice one Keilana. Maybe you'll have a list like mine. :) Acalamari 19:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grove Park

Hi, why have you removed the image I have added to Grove Park railway station? It shows the station, and I had it to the correct size to fit on the page (after adding the 300px thing, which I forgot.)

Please feel free to add it back if you decide it is actually suitable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grove_Park_railway_station&oldid=206885678

cheers, Dan Llamafish (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I finally got around to doing a peer review of history of timekeeping devices. I posted it here. I hope it is helpful! Awadewit (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Grove Park

Thanks for that!

I thought there was nothing wrong with it, but you never know!

You probably reverted it just as I was correcting the 300px thing, so it was missed


cheers,

Dan

Llamafish (talk) 10:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]