Wikipedia:Requested moves

For requested mergers, see Wikipedia:Proposed mergers. For removals, see Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. For page history mergers, see Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. For media restoration, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Media Restoration.

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.

Please read the article titling policy and the guideline regarding primary topics before moving a page or requesting a page move.

Any autoconfirmed user can use the Move function to perform most moves (see Help:How to move a page). If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

• Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. See: § Requesting technical moves.
• Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
• A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
• Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus to move the page is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will carry out the request. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion may be closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

When not to use this page

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

• Making an uncontroversial move – if you can, be bold and do it yourself! If you can't, see § Requesting technical moves.
• Renaming a category – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
• Renaming a stub template – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
• Renaming an image or other file – see Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving a file page.
• Moves from draft namespace or user space to article space – Unconfirmed users: add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Confirmed users: Move the page yourself.
• Merging two articles – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, or be bold and do it yourself.
• Splitting an article – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed article splits, or be bold and do it yourself.
• Requesting that page histories be merged – list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
• Contesting a move request close – use the Wikipedia:Move review process.

Undiscussed moves

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

• No article exists at the new target title;
• There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
• It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Uncontroversial requests

Only list proposals here that are clearly uncontroversial but require administrator help to complete (for example, spelling and capitalization fixes). Do not list a proposed page move in this section if there is any reasonable possibility that it could be opposed by anyone. Please list new requests at the bottom of the list in this section and use {{subst:RMassist|Old page name|Requested name|Reason for move}} rather than copying previous entries. The template will automatically include your signature. No edits to the article's talk page are required. If you object to a proposal listed here, please relist it in the #Incomplete and contested proposals section below.

• Passer (River) → Passirio — The article was recently moved without discussion from a long established name (30 August 2007 by an admin), and probably against WP:UE. — Supparluca 14:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Incomplete and contested proposals

With the exception of a brief description of the problem or objection to the move proposal, please do not discuss move proposals here. If you support an incomplete or contested move proposal, please consider following the instructions above to complete the proposal, and move it to the "Other Proposals" section below under the current date. Proposals that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

• Tobacco consumption → Tobacco products — Reversed position on page title, "products" provide provides its advantages for the inclusion of "paraphernalia". — ChyranandChloe (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Incomplete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Other proposals

13 February 2009

• The Voyage of Bran → Immram Brain —(Discuss)— I'd suggest moving the Irish tale to its proper title Immram Brain (now a redirect with a history), which is after all how the text is usually referred to in scholarly literature. Encyclopedias like Celtic Culture (ed. John T. Koch) also favour the Irish title, whether Immram Brain or Immram Brain maic Febail. For a similar discussion and further reasons, see Talk:Togail Bruidne Dá Derga. --Cavila (talk) 10:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

• Trickster (video game) → Trickster Online —(Discuss)— Trickster Online is the official name recognized by the developers/publishers, Ntreev USA --DarkSteps (talk) 06:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

• Peter T. King → Pete King — (Discuss) — Pete King is the name he is associated with, and it is also the name on his congress website. Pete King redirects there anyway. - Rockyobody (talk) 03:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Insufficient discussion, relisting for further input. Parsecboy (talk) 01:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

• Bank of New York → The Bank of New York —(Discuss)— Per WP:COMMONNAME. "The" is part of the company's common name, as it appears in their old logo before they merged with Mellon. --Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 20:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Insufficient discussion, relisting for further input. Parsecboy (talk) 00:55, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

• Baloch Regiment (British Indian Army) → 10th Baluch Regiment — (Discuss) per discussion on Talk page. Xn4 (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

12 February 2009

• Clamshell (disambiguation) → Clamshell —(Discuss)— Can't see why the form factor (Flip (form)) should be more notable --— Peter L <talk|contribs> 21:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines → Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Article guidelines —(Discuss)— Guidelines encompass both style and content; move would more accurately categorize the guidelines. --—Erik (talk • contrib) 17:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

• True Family → Family of Sun Myung Moon —(Discuss)— The original title is used only by members of Moon's church. The new one would be more universal and more neutral. --Redddogg (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

• History of evolutionary thought → History of evolutionary biology —(Discuss)— The current title of this article (History of evolutionary thought) does not seem appropriate. Firstly, evolutionary thought is not an encyclopedic topic as evidenced by the fact that it does not have its own article (I created it as a redirect to this article earlier today). "History of evolutionary biology" would be a much more appropriate title, as this article is the expanded history section of that article. This move would also serve to distinguish this article from the history of sociocultural evolution, galaxy formation and evolution, and other types of evolution. --Neelix (talk) 11:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

• Puteri Indonesia → Miss Indonesia Universe —(Discuss)— This is English Wikipedia. Did not move unilaterally because Miss Indonesia Universe page exists as a redirect - better to allow for discussion first --Davidelit (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC) Davidelit (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

• Two related moves:
  • Horse → Domestic horse
  • Wild horse → Horse

  —(Discuss)— Bring everything in line with modern insights in the taxonomy of this group. For that reason, Horse has to be moved to domestic horse first after which the current page at Wild Horse can be moved to Horse. ---- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 04:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

• Bosnian-Herzegovinian American → Bosnian American —(Discuss)— per WP:COMMONNAME --PRODUCER (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

11 February 2009

• Diffusivity (biology) → Mass diffusivity —(Discuss)— The topic is not specific to biology. --Stan J. Klimas (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Nörten-Hardenberg → ? —(Discuss)— I am pretty sure that non-huge towns are supposed to have a qualifier of some kind —-Zeus-^u_c 23:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Newcastle Airport → Newcastle International Airport —(Discuss)— This is the proper name for the airport, as per the company's official webiste. --MrShamrock (talk) 20:50, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• South's Oldest Rivalry (UNC-Virginia) → South's Oldest Rivalry —(Discuss)— This is the proper name of this game. There is no other game by this title as the disambiguation lists the Deep South's Oldest Rivalry and the I-64 Bowl. The disambiguation page could remain but should be South's Oldest Rivalry (disambiguation). The "Deep South's Oldest Rivalry" goes by that exact title, with the "Deep" in it. The other game promoted as the "South's Oldest Rivalry" here is not given that proper name by any media but in a single reference in promotional materials of one of the schools actually participating in the game. Probably 99% or more of media mentions of "South's Oldest Rivalry" without "Deep" in it refer to one game only, the others are relatively obscure. Wise (talk) 17:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• British Battleaxe → Christine Hamilton —(Discuss)— Although this is now her legal name, more commonly known as the latter --89.240.5.5 (talk) 14:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Destination Maternity Corp → Destination Maternity —(Discuss)— no need for legal status in article name --Austin Murphy (talk) 14:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Apple MessagePad → MessagePad —(Discuss)— There is no need to include the brand name in the article title in this case. --—INTRIGUEBLUE (talk|contribs) 12:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• GReeeeN → Greeeen —(Discuss)— WP:MOS-JAPAN and MOS:TM --(Moon) and (Sunrise) 11:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Rachelle Lefèvre → Rachelle Lefevre —(Discuss)— The surname Lefèvre, rather than Lefevre, is not supported by the vast majority of references for this person. The article title should show what is verifiable in reliable sources per WP:BLP --dissolve^talk 09:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Manhã De Carnaval (A Day in the Life of a Fool) → Manhã de Carnaval —(Discuss)— Most common title. --Jafeluv (talk) 09:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• SPEED World Challenge → Speed World Challenge —(Discuss)— Per Wikipedia:MOSCAPS and Speed (TV channel). --Falcadore (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• J. Bonnie Newman → Bonnie Newman —(Discuss)— Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions, it would be best to use the simple name rather than including the initial. --Muboshgu (talk) 02:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

• Cofidis (cycling team) → Cofidis, Le Crédit en Ligne —(Discuss)— While this name does seem a little advertise-y, it appears on the UCI official website and it gets rid of the parenthetical qualifier, which is something I almost always support. --Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 00:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

10 February 2009

• List of Pokémon episodes (season 1) — (Discuss) —
• List of Pokémon episodes (season 2) — (Discuss) —

  Would like to move them to:

  • List of Pokémon: Indigo League episodes
  • List of Pokémon: Adventures on The Orange Islands episodes
  • Reason: I'd like to move them to match the other seasons of Pokemon episodes. Example: List of Pokemon: The Johto Journeys episodes and all the others are the same as The Johto Journeys, but season 1 (Indigo League) and season 2 (Orange Islands) are not like that (they are like "List of Pokemon episodes (season 1/2)), so I'd like to move them so they match how the other List of Pokemon episodes articles are.

    Permission granted? PhilKnight is the the administrator who informed me to post here. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

• Premiair (Indonesian airline) → Premiair —(Discuss)— Primary topic: only other usage is as a former name of another airline, which can be handled by a hatnote --PamD (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

• Steve Mason (disambiguation) → Steve Mason -(Discuss))- No page titled "Steve Mason," it redirects to this disam page. RandySavageFTW (talk) 19:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

• Electric Dylan controversy → Bob Dylan at the Newport Folk Festival 1965 —(Discuss)— 'Controversy' is a greatly overused word, particularly on Wikipedia. The new title I propose states that it is about a particular Dylan concert, and contains details on that (and hence its repercussions). --Dancarney (talk) 14:08, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

• Morning Musume Tanjō 10 Nen Kinentai → Morning Musume Tanjō 10nen Kinentai —(Discuss)— The "nen" (Kanji: 年) here is used as a counter for years, and not as a noun; thus, shouldn't be capitalized and be attached with the number 10. --Eugh jei (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

9 February 2009

• Evelyn Stuart → Lord Evelyn Stuart — (Discuss) — Commonly known as Lord Evelyn Stuart. This was also the former name of the article — Tryde (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• William Stuart (Cardiff) → Lord William Stuart — (Discuss) — Commonly known as Lord William Stuart. This was also the former name of the article — Tryde (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• Declaration Tour → The Declaration Tour - 2009 —(Discuss)— According to David Cook's official website and the press release source from the article show that the tour is called "The Declaration Tour - 2009" and not "Declaration Tour." Currently the later redirects to the former. --Aspects (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• Magnetic stripe card → Magnetic card —(Discuss)— More general name, to avoid the making of new stub articles and cover all types in the same article. --Wayiran (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• Go West, young man (phrase) → Go West, young man —(Discuss)— No other use of this exact phrase (caps and comma), and have made disambiguation page to mop up similar ones --PamD (talk) 14:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
• Kostioukovitch Elena → Elena Kostioukovitch —(Discuss)— The title of a biography should be the person's first name and then last name -- — CactusWriter | ^needles 12:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• St James Park (Exeter) → St James Park —(Discuss)— As below, this was moved unilaterally. There is no need for St James Park to redirect to St James's Park. The incoming links overwhelmingly go to St James Park (Exeter) --Pretty Green (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• Professional association → Professional body —(Discuss)— Without any response on the Talk page, I am requesting a Move back to original naming. The move was not discussed and seems exclusionary. Reasoning: Neutrality of redirects "Non-neutral redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term." I feel the term "Association" is not as neutral, or inclusive, as "Body" is in this particular instance. --Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 03:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• M1 Garand rifle → M1 Garand —(Discuss)— It's been suggested that "rifle" is an unnecessary qualifier in the article name, and there's currently a discussion about this proposed rename on the article's talk page. If a consensus to rename is reached, administrator assistance will be needed, since "M1 Garand" is a redirect that has an edit history. --— Mudwater ^(Talk) 01:29, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

• Luminous Arc 2: Will → Luminous Arc 2 —(Discuss)— The North American release lacks a subtitle (it is simply Luminous Arc 2). --Evice (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

8 February 2009

• Haptics (disambiguation) → ? —(Discuss)— 'Haptic' or 'Haptics' should be the primary dab page —Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• St James' Park, Newcastle → St James' Park — (Discuss) — A move over redirect is required to fix a bold but contested move done outside of the RM process, See Talk:St James' Park, Newcastle. — [[Talk:#Move?|(Discuss)]] — MickMacNee (talk) 15:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• EPA (disambiguation) → EPA —(Discuss)— EPA should be the prim dab pg. ---- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Relisting: minimal input and unclear consensus.--Aervanath (talk) 08:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• Universal Studios Florida → Universal Orlando Resort — (Discuss) - Name of park and resort was changed several years ago to Universal Orlando Resort, The Universal Studios Florida name is no longer used at all. Rosie, Queen of Corona (talk) 01:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• Okavango Region → Kavango Region — (Discuss) - i propose to move this page as Kavango Region is the more common name, also used by the local government: http://www.kavangorc.com.na/ and http://www.arc.org.na/home.php?pn=okavango_council Foundert (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Backlog

Move dated sections here after five days have passed (June 29 or older).

• Red Dragon (novel) → Red Dragon —(Discuss)— opening discussion to decide if the novel is the primary topic or whether the disambiguation page should be moved --Tassedethe (talk) 15:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

• Split (ten pin bowling) → Split (bowling) — (Discuss) — Unnecessary disambig. — Simply south not SS, sorry 18:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Relisting, more discussion is needed to establish consensus. Parsecboy (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

• Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (films) → Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (film) - (Discuss) - This film is one movie being made into two seperate parts. It is uncommon to use (films) on Wikipedia, also. -- ChaosMaster16 (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC)ChaosMaster16

• Bust a Groove → Bust A Groove — (Discuss) — The said requested page is aleady a redirect however, the official title has a capital 'A' but moved to a page which hasn't. --JCD ^(Talk) 00:00, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

• Stayfree (feminine hygiene) → Stayfree — (Discuss) — No need for the disambiguation because "Stayfree" just redirects to "Stayfree (feminine hygiene)" — Moretto (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

• Marko Đoković → Marko Djokovic —(Discuss)— The page's creation title was "Marko Djokovic," the most common spelling in print. His brother's page already exists at "Novak Djokovic" and the difference in spelling is causing some confusion. --Yano (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

• Archimedes' screw → Archimedes screw or Archimedean screw —(Discuss)— "Archimedes' screw" only works if it is never used with an article (i.e., treated as a concept. (For example, "Murphy's Law" is acceptable because we never say "the Murphy's Law".) However, it is common to say "the Archimedes screw" to refer to either the concept or a specific instance of an Archimedean screw, which requires "Archimedes" to be cast as an noun-cum-adjective rather than a possessive. See the talk page for a more detailed explanation. —Tonyle (talk • contribs) 18:12, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

• Military of xxxx → Armed forces of xxxx — (Discuss) —Over redirect: "Armed forces" means the land army, air force and navy of a country, while "Military", while meaning the same thing, can also refer to just the land army, and thus is ambigious. Per Pervious lengthy discussions on MilHist talk page "Armed forces" is preferable to "Military" in names like this" — Patton^t/c 19:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Military of Italy → Armed forces of Italy
  • Military of Japan → Armed forces of Japan
  • Military of Mozambique → Armed forces of Mozambique
  • Military of Pakistan → Armed forces of Pakistan
  • Military of Peru → Armed forces of Peru
    • These can all be discussed in one place. But make a link to it and list in "Other" below. 199.125.109.126 (talk) 20:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Military seems to indicate that it has been synonymous with "armed forces" for the last 200 years. I'm not sure why these pages were moved after an objection had already been lodged, and the secondary redirects weren't fixed, so I'm going to move the pages back. As 199.125.109.126 says, please create a central discussion if you want the pages to be moved. Dekimasuよ! 01:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Also note that there are far more than just these pages in question; see Category:Military by country. Dekimasuよ! 01:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
    • List of all pages whose names start "Military of" Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• Hungry (Winger song) → Hungry (song) — (Discuss) — The Winger song is currently the only song by this title with an article and was, until recently, at Hungry (song). Another editor moved the article to (Winger's song) and turned the (song) page into dab page. I moved (Winger's song) to the correctly named (Winger song), and redirected (song) to it. But the article should be returned to its original location with a hatnote directing users to Hunger (disambiguation) for other songs with the title "Hungry". — ShelfSkewed Talk 04:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

• De Bono Hats → Six Thinking Hats —(Discuss)— Current title due to error in moving and now stuck. historical title debono hats is not title in main usage and may be biased due to debate over origins --Innovationbrain (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC) Innovationbrain (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Has been moved back from Six T (referred to above as "current title") to De Bono Hats. 199.125.109.88 (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

• (Discuss) - For purposes of distinguishing from Menemen_(food), the use of adding (District) in parenthesis here is debatable. Other contexts in which the name is frequently used will be better served though Menemen (disambiguation). Just Menemen for the city is probably more appopriate. I tried to move myself as I did for Urla, İzmir, but it didn't work. Cretanforever (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Menemen (District), İzmir → Menemen
  • Menemen → Menemen (disambiguation)

• List of people with name Weekes → List of people with surname Weekes — (Discuss) — Fixes (my) improper original move of content to the target name — Wormcast (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

• Giant Moa → Dinornis -(Discuss) Typiclly the scientific name is used for the all animal pages except for Species. speednat (talk) 21:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

• New Kitakyushu Airport → Kitakyushu Airport — (Discuss) - Old Kitakyushu Airport has been renamed as Kitakyushu Airport (defunct), due to official announcement made by Japanese government as of 18 June 2008. Article posted on Kitakyushu Airport website (Japanese only) --Belle Equipe (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Consensus seems to indicate the page should be moved, but the destination article currently at Kitakyushu Airport needs to be decided. Parsecboy (talk) 20:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• In order to respect French rules about capitalization in titles with a definite article, these songs need to be moved (Discuss):
  • Les hommes qui passent → Les Hommes qui passent ("Les hommes qui passent" is NOT a sentence)
  • Les sucettes → Les Sucettes
  • L'oiseau et l'enfant → L'Oiseau et l'Enfant
  • La belle amour → La Belle Amour
  • La source (song) → La Source (song)

In French, in a title which is not a sentence and beggining with a definite article, the first letter of the name and of the adjective (if it is before the name) are capitalized ; if two names are separated by a coordinating conjunction, their first letters are both capitalized. For more details, these rules are explained here. - Pmiize (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• Mahilyow → Mogilev —(Discuss)— Mogilev is the Russian name, and Mahilyow the Belarusian, for this city in Belarus. Both Russian and Belarusian are official languages in Belarus, and the Russian name is far, far, far more familiar in English than the Belarusian. This proposal might apply to some other Belarusian cities, but I've not looked into it closely yet. --john k (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC) john k (talk) 16:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• Andrei Arshavin → Andrey Arshavin —(Discuss)— Rename in line with how his name is spelt on his current and former employer's official websites. Qwghlm (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC) --Qwghlm (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• Novak Djokovic → ? —(Discuss)— I propose moving the article to Novak Djoković or Novak Đoković. The last letter of the surname is the ć, not the c, that should definitely be changed. As far as Đ or Dj is concerned, I don't really have an opinion either way. —Aecis·(away) ^talk 00:20, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes it should be moved to Novak Đoković because all other tennis players have articles with original diacritics except for this one. See Mario Ančić, Goran Ivanišević etc.--Avala (talk) 12:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

• United States Armed Forces → Armed forces of the United States — (Discuss) — Over redirect: The "United States Armed Forces" is not an actual organisation, it is a collective term for the army, navy, air force, marine corps and coast guard of the United States. Per Naming conventions country-specific articles should be titled "Armed Forces of the United States" rather than "United States Armed Forces" — Patton^t/c 19:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)