Wikipedia:Requests for feedback: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:19, 22 February 2010

Skip to the bottom

Requests for Feedback

Shortcuts

This page provides comments and constructive criticism about articles that you have drafted, created, or substantially changed.
This is not a general help page. To seek assistance or ask a question, see Wikipedia:Questions.
If you are seeking an outside opinion about a dispute, please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.
Please note that this page is patrolled by volunteer editors just like you and it may take several days to review your request.

Before you request feedback

There are certain things which come up again and again so it may help if you deal with them before requesting feedback:

Does your article have reliable sources? These are important in terms of both verifiability and notability.
Do you have a conflict of interest that may harm your ability to produce a neutral article?

If you would like a beginner's guide to these sorts of issues, take a look at the article wizard.

If you are unsure about how to edit Wikipedia articles, take a look at this tutorial.

For a more general discussion of writing your first article, see "Your first article".

How to post a request

Place a Wikilink, with the title of the page inside [[ and ]] - for example, [[User:Example/Lipsum]] or [[Cats]] - in the box below.
Click Click To Add Request
In the new article, Write a brief summary of your work or what in particular you need help with, but do not post the whole article here.
If you have rewritten an existing article, you may wish to provide a diff link from that article's history that shows your changes.
Check regularly for responses to your request; they will most often be made here.

↓ Post your request using the box below. Replace "Untitled" with a wikilink to your article - e.g. [[User:Example/Lipsum]] or [[Cats]] ↓

After Receiving Feedback

Check back here often, as you will receive a response here.
Respond to the feedback, either with a simple thank you, to ask for help with anything mentioned, or, after you've made some of the improvements, what they think of them.
Consider helping out here in the future - anyone can read up on what articles should be like and provide constructive criticism.

Are you providing feedback?

Please consider notifying the user whose article you are providing feedback for by placing a message on their talk page, so they will be able to read it in a timely manner and reply if necessary. You can use..
- {{Feedbackreply-sm}} A template asking the user to check back here and consider responding
- {{Feedbackreply-alt}} A more personal version of the first offering your help with developing, moving to mainspace, etc.

Click here to purge this page (For help, see Wikipedia:Purge)

The previous few days of requests are transcluded below. The pages for the past 20 days are: (click here to refresh)

Index of all requests for feedback

The Chain Gang of 1974

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LCLproject/The_Chain_Gang_of_1974

I'm new to wiki and any help would be greatly appreciated.

LCLproject (talk) 06:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it meets the notability guidelines, but the main things I think you need to do are to break it up into a lede and a paragraph or two, and also supply some references from local newspapers or magazines. Let me know on my talk page if you'd like to have some help with that. Nuujinn (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Siddall (artist)

Requesting feedback on my first article User:Cyberxs/Mark_Siddall Thanks. Andrew Kadar 04:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Georgia

Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Georgia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsnow1 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Siegel (musician)

Hello everyone! Ive created an article about David Siegel and would love any feedback on it. This is my first article, and I tried to get everything right but Id really like to make sure. Also, Im really clueless on the review process...how and when does that happen? Thanks so much! --Dragn77 (talk) 23:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a pretty good start to me, nice to see some reliable inline refs in a new article for a change. There are a few formatting issues with this article though. Firstly, overlinking - well known, major geographic locations like America and Miami don't need to be wikilinks, as per WP:OVERLINKING. Also, I personally don't like to see abbreviations like FL in the main body of the text, not everyone who reads wikipedia is familiar with U.S. state abbreviations - I would actually write Florida for clarity and ease of understanding. Florida also doesn't require a wikilink.

Song titles shouldn't be italicized and should be within quotation marks like - "Escape", not Escape - as detailed in WP:MUSTARD and MOS:MUSIC. Billboard Hot 100 should be formatted and wikilinked like this - Billboard Hot 100. Also, the last two paragraphs are in need of some additional wikilinks and formatting, on things like Billboard magazine, bass, and rock band for example. The discography section is good but could do with being sub-divided into the artists own releases, guest appearances and various artists compilation appearances. Take a look at the Gene Parsons page and see how the discography there is sub-divided for clarity. This is kind of how I would present the discographical info in this article.

Lastly, as someone totally unfamiliar with the artist, I feel that the part where it says "as well as co-writing 3x certified platinum song by the RIAA" is confusing. Do you mean he's written three platinum certified songs or one triple platinum certified song? This ambiguity needs addressing.

All of these points I've made might sound like there's a lot wrong with the article but actually, the majority of its problems fall under the heading of formatting. There's not much actually wrong with the presentation of the article or its text. I'm happy to give you a hand on this article if you want me to but I'll refrain unless you specifically ask me to help. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 02:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dragn77, It is a nice start, I would try and include some biographical info as well. The article is for the most part his song credits and removing some might help with not only the size but the OVERLINKING. The artist's hits would be good or try and compress the section. --NortyNort (talk) 22:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Klingle Road

I've greatly expanded the Klingle Road article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klingle_Road , and perhaps this will no longer be classified as a "stub". Abuelo jack (talk) 17:04, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at first glance, it certainly looks to me as if it's big enough and comprehensive enough not to be rated as a stub any more. However, a bigger problem is that this article had no Lead section - that is, the paragraph or two at the start of the article, before the first "The automobile road" section. Check out WP:LEAD for details on how to construct a suitable lead section. Don't be afraid to repeat info in the lead that is touched on elsewhere in the article because that's exactly what a lead section should do - give a short, overview of the most important points of an article for the casual reader. If people want more info then they can read the rest of the article. Check out the lead section for the album Mr. Tambourine Man, which I was recently involved in writing, and you'll see how it touches upon all of the most important points regarding the song - then these same points are covered in much more detail later on within the main body of the article. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sinus Dynamics

User:JillianHerbert/Sinus Dynamics

This page was drafted to provide information about sinus dynamics. It basically contains general information about the program and a description of the equipment. I plan to add more to it, but for now, I'd like to review feedbacks so I know how to proceed further. --JillianHerbert (talk) 22:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JillianHerbert. The current version is sourced only to press releases and the subject's own website. What is required for both verifiability (WP:V) and notability (WP:N) is independent third-party coverage. ^Bongo_matic 23:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request feedback on additional reference/source —Preceding unsigned comment added by JillianHerbert (talk • contribs) 06:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

eCamp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECamp

Gigiflyer (talk) 08:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been deleted by someone other than myself. --NortyNort (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kim West

I've just written this article about a fashion designer who was well known in the 80s and early 90s as part of Wikiproject fashion. She's particularly interesting because she used latex as a fabric and had to fight preconceptions of that fabric to gain acceptance. Please let me know your thoughts on the article. thanks Andygrub (talk) 14:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a reasonable start, but I think you need more references to meet the notibility guidelines and also to flesh out the article as it's pretty sparse now. Nuujinn (talk) 02:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback - True North Productions

Dear Sir/Madam, I would like to ask for some feedback on the creation of a new article - True North Productions - submitted today. The article is about a television production company and it's the first time I have created an article in this way and it would be useful to confirm that everything is in order. Best Wishes, Glyn Middleton —Preceding unsigned comment added by Truenorthglyn (talk • contribs) 13:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had a look at this article and the most glaring problem at the moment is that there are currently four inline citations in the article that do not support the information given. They are citations directing to a specific webpage and in each case, the webpage does not contain the facts that the refs are supposed to support. For instance, the article says that programmes made by True North Productions "have so far been screened in 186 countries." However, the ref that follows this statement directs to a web page and nowhere on that webpage does it state that this the correct number of countries. It's not enough to link to a website which may contain the relevant info, the inline refs should link to the specific page where the information you're citing can easily be found. Consequently, I've tagged this article with multiple "failed verification" tags and a "citecheck" banner at the top. These should only be removed when this problem is fixed. There's also the possibility of a conflict of interest with this article but as long as you're careful that what you write isn't biased, it should be OK. Post a message on my talk page (click the word "talk" in my signature) if you want any further help or advice with this article. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 15:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Alliance

Daisy Alliance is an article I have just written. Before continuing, I would like to know whether being both author/editor and founder of Daisy Alliance would be a COI. Bruce RothBrucearoth (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it would be a conflict of interest- as founder, you may be unlikely to add unfavorable information/criticism about the organization and may, even unknowingly, write the article like an advertisement. However, you may continue work if you "exercise great caution".

If you have already written the article, make a userspace draft (see Help:Userspace draft) by creating User:Brucearoth/Daisy Alliance and ask on this page for comments on your draft. If the article is deemed notable and NPOV and is created, declare your relationship on the article's talk page and avoid making edits to the article other than undoing blatant vandalism. Rather, request changes on the article's talk page.

First things first, though- establish the notability of the Daisy Alliance. I searched just NY Times (found no articles) and UN.org (found this page). You'll need at least 2-3 third party sources to establish notability- see WP:GNG and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Liqudluck✽talk 23:53, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RexManningDay/new_article_name_here

I wrote an entry on the Long Island based indie rock band Aunt Ange with most of the information taken from their website. As this is my first article for wikipedia, I was worried that I might not have enough references. Thanks for your help!

best,

Rich (RexManningDay (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The subject does not seem to meet Wikipedia's notability standards (see particularly WP:BAND). The sources offered also are insufficient for Wikipedia's verifiability policy. Moreover, the text appears to be copy/pasted from the band's website, in contravention of Wikipedia's copyrighted material policy. The article should be deleted in its current form and recreated if and when the subject can be verified to meet the notability standards. ^Bongo_matic 21:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

circumference of an oval --Whats inside the light bulb? (talk) 02:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cirumference of an oval

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Whats_inside_the_light_bulb%3F/new_article_name_here It's my first article tell me what you think --Whats inside the light bulb? (talk) 02:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Although interesting, I am not sure if this is encyclopedic.--NortyNort (talk) 23:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you need to give it some structure, and you need to watch spelling errors (it's vertical and horizontal, not virtical and horizantal). also, this would probably be better as part of a bigger article on computing circumferences...

for structure, what you should do is write out an introductory paragraph - basically tell us what the article is about, and then start a new section where you tell us how to do it. look at the manual of style to get an idea of what the page should look like. --Ludwigs2 23:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cynthia Cozette Lee

User:Lezahstar/Cynthia Cozette Lee is an article about the life, music and works of a living African American female classical music composer. Please review the article's format and language to see if any changes need to be made in the article. I think the article is ready to go live. Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Lezahstar (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While Cozette sounds like a great musician, the article does not yet demonstrate her notability (how Wikipedians determine what subjects merit an article) and, as a result, would likely be deleted. The basic way of establishing notability is to make sure the article meets the general notability guideline. If the article is unable to meet that guideline, it may meet more specific, music related notability guidelines on Wikipedia:Notability (music). If your article is nominated for deletion, be prepared to defend your article by demonstrating how it meets at least one notability guideline.

The article also has a lot of information but no references. Wikipedia has a policy against original research, so please cite your sources. If you're unsure of how to cite, please see WP:Referencing for beginners. The latter part of the article looks like a resume- please convert this to prose.

Hope that helps. If you have questions, contact me by clicking the pink "talk". Liqudluck✽talk 06:52, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women

Hi, this is my first article for wikipedia. Would welcome any feedback/contributions from you more experienced contributors. User:Martlayton/The Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women Many thanks. --Martlayton (talk) 22:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice start. What you'll need to do is add inline references to the supporting material- please read WP:Referencing for beginners. References should include at least the resource's author, publisher, and access date. The preferred way and, in my opinion, the easiest way of citing accurately is by using citation templates.

It may be worth adding the infobox for legislation: Template:Infobox Legislation. Leave unapplicable fields blank and they won't show up. Let me know on my talk page if you have further questions (click "talk" at the end of my signature). Liqudluck✽talk 01:07, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Madison, Sirius/XM Satellite Radio DJ

I was shocked to find out that my favorite radio DJ didn't have a wikipedia page when most of her fellow Sirius Radio co-workers do. I decided to dig up some sources about her and start a wiki page on her behalf. I'm looking forward to getting it live!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jami0821/Madison

Jami0821 (talk) 02:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC) Jami Gibbs 1/2/10[reply]

Madison Radio DJ

She is pleasant on the eyes in that picture but it appears to be a copyright violation. Is Myspace actually raeleased under Creative Commons or did you just tag it as so?
The citations are not formatted. Wikipedia:Citing sources/example style and Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners might help.
Myspace as an external link is normally to be avoided (WP:ELNO).
Category:FA-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles might help you with some ideas on possible avenues of expansion. Wikipedia:Layout is also a must for how to handle the different sections.
"Or a hooker. She is Jewish" is just plain weird. I assume they are not related but you took something that should be quoted (and put in context for the reader) and plopped religion next to it.
Add an infobox
Find more sources. Any reviews or other independent write ups in the press?
It might need a new title. Madison(DJ/entertainer/something like that)

Cptnono (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The_Inquisition_(underground_newspaper)

The_Inquisition_(underground_newspaper) User:Smalljones/Inquisition_(underground_newspaper) This article will complete a referenced but not existent article on this briefly lived but significant underground newspaper in Charlotte, NC. Reliable references and links to collected copies are included in the article. Smalljones (talk) 22:06, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Begin

User:Montrealfitness/Andre Begin

I am writing to request feeback, Thank you kindly. Montrealfitness (talk) 05:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Montrealfitness, looks like a good start.

I would fix the external links with this coding: *[http://www.musclememory.com/showArticle.php?mb671136 Muscle Builder, Vol 9, No 8, Page 36, November 1967]
Maybe do a biography info box, see Template:Infobox person.
The career sections can be sub-sectioned under a "Professional life" section.
The Dedication to Holistic Health lifestyle can be placed elsewhere or removed.
Try and break up the intro in separate paragraphs or remove/compress some info.

I created this bio with the biography template, for example: John L. Savage. Hope this helps. --NortyNort (talk) 23:20, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David R. Gamperl

I would like to request feedback on my article, David R. Gamperl. It is a biography of an entrepreneur who is based in Chicago, Illinois. Thank you, Carmelita Rubin 17:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by CarmelitaRubin (talk • contribs)

The article is nicely laid out, but my worry is that that the subject is probably not notable. If one of the companies he has been involved in is notable, then the usual thing to do would be to have an article on that company and mention its founder or leader in that article. And if a businessperson has not been involved in any companies that are notable enough for their own article, then that businessperson is almost certainly not notable in their own right. Have a good read through the guidelines at WP:Notable. Itsmejudith (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sustainable Electronics Initiative

Sustainable Electronics Initiative needs your feedback. Please take a moment to give us your comments. Thanks!!

Timonkhsu (talk) 21:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Nichols

Draft
Jimmy Nichols is an esteemed keyboard player, producer, and music industry executive in Nashville, Tennessee. He has served as musical director/keyboardist on tour with Reba McEntire and Faith Hill. Other artist credits include: Carrie Underwood, Kelly Pickler, Mindy McCready, Billy Gilman, Elton John, The Martins, Jerry Kilgore, Trick Pony, Alabama, Hank Williams Jr. Sherrié Austin, Keith Urban, Lonestar, Craig Morgan, Jeff Bates, Lee Ann Womack, Jessica Simpson (credited as James Ginnetti), Brooks & Dunn, John Mellencamp, Sarah Darling, Julianne Hough, Tim McGraw, Billy Ray Cyrus, Reba McEntire, Carnie Wilson, and Steve Holy. He is currently the president of a record label in Nashville, Tennessee called, Black River Music Group. Their artist roster includes, Sarah Darling, Emma Jacob, and Jeff Bates. Early Life Jimmy Nichols, formally known as James Ginnetti, was born and raised in Columbus, Ohio. He was brought up in a very musical family, along with seven other siblings. His multi-talented father, Joey “Nichols” Ginnetti, had a huge musical influence on his children. Sadly, Joey Ginnetti died suddenly of cancer, leaving the rest of the Ginnetti family to carry on his musical influence. Career Career Jimmy began playing piano professionally at the age of 10, where he and his four brothers became very well-known around the Columbus area. They became known as “The Nichols Brothers.” Around 1980, The Nichols Brothers landed gigs touring with Eddie Rabbitt, Kenny Rogers, Barbara Mandrell, Mel Tillis, Roy Clark, and many, many others. They toured the country until 1994, when they were finally called to Nashville for a potential record deal. Sadly, their record deal did not work out. The only thing that stemmed from the record label was a chance to be a billboard pick with their song, “That’s When You Know It’s Over.” Before they even had a chance, the record label went under. In 1992, they met Terry and Kim Pegula, a successful business team who believed that The Nichols Brothers deserved another chance at stardom. Although things did not work out like they had planned, Jimmy was connected with legendary producer, David Malloy. David recognized Jimmy’s talent on the piano, and began using him for all of his recording sessions, beginning with Mindy McCready. Since then, Jimmy has become one of Nashville’s top session players. His artist credits include Carrie Underwood, Kelly Pickler, Mindy McCready, Billy Gilman, Elton John, The Martins, Jerry Kilgore, Trick Pony, Alabama, Hank Williams Jr. Sherrié Austin, Keith Urban, Lonestar, Craig Morgan, Jeff Bates, Lee Ann Womack, Jessica Simpson (credited as James Ginnetti), Brooks & Dunn, John Mellencamp, Sarah Darling, Julianne Hough, Tim McGraw, Billy Ray Cyrus, Reba McEntire, Carnie Wilson, and Steve Holy. Recent Currently, Jimmy and his wife, Tonya, have reconnected with Terry and Kim Pegula, and have formed the record label Black River Music Group located in Nashville, Tennessee. He currently is producing and recording Black River artists Sarah Darling, Jeff Bates, and Emma Jacob. References http://www.emu.com/artists/artist_jimmy_nichols.asp http://www.fullsail.edu/?fa=news.story&contentID=19079&section=degreeGeneral&pg=1&industry=no http://www.buddyleeattractions.com/talent.php?id=31 http://www.blackrivermusicgroup.com/about/Jimmy-Nichols External links [1] [2] [3]

Any such draft should be made in your user space not here. Let me know if you need a hand setting that up. A couple quick notes, everything above is not OK without independent coverage for both verification and to assert notability. Also, watch out for words like "esteemed" since it looks like overly promotional.Cptnono (talk) 23:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scoliosis Research Society

Scoliosis Research Society Scoliosis Research Society

Msr250 (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Msr250/Scoliosis Research Society

You need independent coverage of the subject. "'Independent of the subject' excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc." - Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. :Something like "the SRS has gained recognition as one of the world's premier spine societies" is unacceptable without an inline citation from a reputable third party source.Cptnono (talk) 23:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Eskelsen

Requesting feedback on my new article Lily Eskelsen. All feedback appreciated. Thanks!--Thelema12 (talk) 00:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thelema12, looks good. I made on minor change in the intro. I made this biography a few weeks ago and I used the bio template. You may want to put an info box in there.--NortyNort (talk) 03:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nherbw/new_article_name_here

I have created a page for Embedded Systems Conference.

Nherbw (talk) 00:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I have added some more links and updated the contents for the ESC page. I would greatly appreciate any help on making the article better. Thanks! Nherbw (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pixetell

Pixetell Pixetell

Hello: I have been working on the above mentioned page to improve it so that it meets the Wikipedia standard. I am employed by the company, Ontier, that makes and sells Pixetell. I have sought the guidance of a Wikipedia expert in my attempt to strengthen the article; I did not write the original version that was initially tagged for possible deletion. I would greatly appreciate any feedback on the article so that it can be upgraded.

Dcookatontier (talk) 18:05, 04 January 2010 (PST

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikilarry/Gendicine

I created this page to document the medication Gendicine.

This is a commercial product and it is referred to by several wiki pages (e.g. Gene Therapy).

thanks,

-larry Wikilarry (talk) 10:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That looks fine as a stub to me so I've moved it to the main space. It could do with more details and references but it is clearly a notable product and worthy of its own article. Smartse (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tika and The Dissidents

Hello, I would like to request feedback on my article, Tika and The Dissidents This article is about indonesian band Tika & the Dissidents who received many achievements despite releasing their album on their own label. Thank you. Antosastra (talk) 14:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a couple of maintenance tags which really speak for themselves. The tone, especially in the lead paragraph, is not appropriate, see WP:LEAD, and overall the tone is a little too promotional and unencyclopedic. You should also make sure that the band meets the notability requirements set out at WP:BAND. – ukexpat (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's some formatting problems with this page. For example, the song and album titles - they don't need to be in bold for a start. You might want to take a look at WP:MUSTARD#Formatting and WP:MOSMUSIC to see how things like song titles/album titles and music articles in general should be formatted. Also, the magazine mentioned in the first sentence should be formatted as Time magazine, as per WP:MOST. In addition, there seems to be some inconsistency in the body of the article regarding whether the band is called the Dissidents or The Dissidents (with a capital "T"). This needs to be correctly decided upon and then stuck to, as per Names (definite article). My feeling, from the little bit of research on Google I've just done, is that it should be The Dissidents. However, if this is incorrect then the article title itself is also incorrect and should be moved to Tika and the Dissidents. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 22:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Premier Asia

Hello, I would like to request feedback regarding my article on the DVD distribution company Premier Asia. Thank you.

Tdk4051 (talk) 18:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:CORP for our notability guidelines for companies and at WP:FAQO for more detail. At the moment the article does not address how or why the company is notable - you will need references from third party reliable sources to support notability, and those references must be significant coverage rather than just passing mentions. – ukexpat (talk) 20:31, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Natrob87/Hurdle Machine Works

History of the company I work for. They have changed the way the sawmill industry runs several times. I hope you will consider this submission.

Natrob87 (talk) 21:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A few comments: first, because of your connection with the company, you have a significant conflict of interest and are strongly discourage from creating such an article. However, that is not fatal assuming if the article is written from a neutral point of view. On the substance, please take a look at WP:CORP for our notability guidelines for companies and at WP:FAQO for more detail. You will need more references from reliable sources to support notability, and those references must be significant coverage rather than just passing mentions. On the formatting, please take a look at other company articles to see how they are laid out - you don't need the first heading, but you do need a lead section as described in WP:LEAD; you should also Wikilink to other articles where appropriate; and we use sentence case for headings as described at WP:MOSHEAD. But first concentrate on the notability issue, the formatting can be cleaned up later. – ukexpat (talk) 20:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Shri Punitachariji

User:Only4ufriend1/Swami Shri Punitachariji

Only4ufriend1 (talk) 05:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Shivam agrawal 6.1.2010[reply]

Please take a look at WP:BIO - at the moment the draft does not indicate how or why the subject is notable as required by Wikipedia's inclusion criteria. You will need to cite significant coverage in reliable sources to support notability. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Kador

Requesting feedback on new article about writer John Kador. [4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RobertGeorge10/John_Kador

RobertGeorge10 (talk) 19:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:BIO and WP:AUTHOR - you will need some reliable sources to support notability. Also note that the external links to online booksellers are not appropriate. You will also need to shorten the list of publications because at the moment the draft reads more like a promotional curriculum vitae than a neutral, encyclopedic article. Please take a look at WP:MOSBIO and other biographical articles to see how they are laid out. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 19:35, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Paley

I just made my first wiki page attempt: Stephen Paley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Idiolect43/new_article_name_here

Would appreciate help.

Idiolect43 (talk) 00:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deshbandhu: Hindi Newspaper

User:Tarushikha/Deshbandhu: Hindi Newspaper

Deshbandhu: Hindi NewspaperDeshbandhu: Hindi Newspaper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarushikha (talk • contribs) 09:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably notable but at the moment the draft is totally unsourced. You will need to cite significant coverage in reliable sources to support the notability of the subject. – ukexpat (talk) 17:15, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The_Gore_Effect

Hi i would like feedback from the community on this article [[5]] If you have time take a look and post any thoughts in the article talk page, thanks --mark nutley (talk) 12:35, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion has not happened here, it is now back up while talks go on to see if it should stay, if you`d like to take a look and have your say you still can. I would appreciate crits as this was my first try at actually writing an article in my usespace (my first artilce try was a disaster lol) Thanks --mark nutley (talk) 14:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to tell you, this won't become an article. It will be regarded as a bit of trivia and violation of our biographies of living persons policy. Also, I read in it that an event of the 2000s coincided with "the first snow in London since 1922", sourced to the Washington Times. I think you'll find that there was quite a lot of snow in 1962-3 and in 1978-9, just to pick out two of the coldest years. Perhaps it's a typo for 1992, in which case - what's the big deal? I hope you will try your hand at other articles - if you do, look at the style for WP:LEDE lead paragraphs. Itsmejudith (talk) 17:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you believe it violates BLP? --GoRight (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it could be taken as gossip that is (mildly) derogatory towards Al Gore. But if you want to argue that it's encyclopedic, please go ahead and do so. Itsmejudith (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Er, why did you delete the previous comments on this request? That was totally inappropriate. – ukexpat (talk) 18:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry man, i replied on my talk page --mark nutley (talk) 18:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As in de.wp we actually got this article and it features the main page today, I'd like t osuggest that this article be integrated in en.wp, too. Sure you know about "our" draconian deletion policies, and maybe you could estimeem the article's surviving them as a test for relevance etc. (and, maybe not). I's suggest rewriting the en. article to fit quality standars, it's sure relevant. Regards, -- Klingon83 (talk) 14:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tnakagiri/SkyOne Federal Credit Union

Tnakagiri (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Tom Nakagiri 1/8/10[reply]

A great start. You could link to the FAA in the lead. Use a piped link WP:LINK if you need to link from the previous name to the article that uses the current name. Ready to go live, I think. Itsmejudith (talk) 14:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is Love and There is Fear

User:Philibration/There is love and There is Fear

Philibration (talk) 20:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Phyllibration 1/10/2010[reply]

This is my first article about the "I Can Do IT" conference in Tampa Fla in Nov 2009. I have tried to follow the guidelines, but would appreciate constructive feedback to help me with the article.

Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis

User:Stefanir/Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis

The Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis is a leading research center at the University of Southern California.

Stefanir (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mars to Stay

Hi, suggestions welcome for improving this first draft of an article on "Mars to Stay"

User:Ericmachmer/Mars to Stay

Thanks for your help, it is appreciated...

Ericmachmer (talk) 06:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverend Bob Childress

I am hoping that I can get some feedback for an article that I created. It is about a noteworthy Appalachian Minister. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverend_Bob_Childress. Any input or additions would be welcome. Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 00:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Georgesh1/Heroes In the Sky(game)

Hello. I am looking for a friendly user who would like to look at my draft that I created. It is about a computer game. The draft page is there as a link. Any inputs, additions, and a little bit of deletion would be welcome.Georgesh1 (talk) 3:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Comunis

User:Fparvex/new article name here

Hi, I started this article about a project, Comunis, which will produce interesting tools and benchmarks on spatial development. This project runs under an european Program, Interreg IV B Alpine Space, which has also created a page on Wikipedia. - How can I publish this Comunis page on the main page ? - Maybe I am not certified ? - Should I use another title like "Commercial Location Development" ? - What kind of references should I put as it is an international public program? After it I'll link this page from the Alpine Space Programme page.

Thanks for your comments and help.

Fparvex (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Kovarik

I have juts written my first article on Austrialian mountain bike legend Chris Kovarik and would appreciate any opinions/feeds back on the article. You can find it in my userspace here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TinaEPO/Chris_Kovarik —Preceding unsigned comment added by TinaEPO (talk • contribs) 15:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LocalEats

User:Cathrjohnson/LocalEats

Summary of new article: Description of website/smartphone app/book series LocalEats, published by Where The Locals Eat.

This is my first article, so any advice is very much welcome! Thanks.

Cathrjohnson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cathrjohnson (talk • contribs) 17:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

correct date of birth

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranjeeta_Kaur

Ranjeeta "Robby" Kaur (born 22 September 1962) is an Indian movie actress.[1] She was trained at FTII. She has appeared in around 47 films. October 22, 1962 (age 47)

in ur wiki there is two date of birth is shown for Ranjeeta Kaur plz rectife it....... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharma1988vivek (talk • contribs) 18:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How do we know which date is correct? Do you have a reliable source? – ukexpat (talk) 18:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bert Morgan

Bert Morgan Bert Morgan Grandcraft (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Smart

Jason Smart is a local "celebrity" for his work in state politics which has now progressed to Russian politics. His work in post-Soviet politics has been unusual for an American to pursue. I read one of his articles and really empathized with his points. I appreciate any comments or ideas on how this article can be improved. Thank you! Джейсон Смарт известный человек который работает в Америке и России. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yuriipetrovich/jasonsmart --Yuriipetrovich (talk) 21:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC) I made a couple of other changes since yesterday. I look forward to the editor's comments! Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuriipetrovich (talk • contribs) 17:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC) What else must be done to have my article published? --Yuriipetrovich (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2010 (UTC) Hi! I am still trying to get this article on Smart published. How do I go about that? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yuriipetrovich/jasonsmart --Yuriipetrovich (talk) 23:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jerome Elston Scott

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Extracare4u/JeromeElstonScott

Hello Everyone,

Take a look at my article. Any advice would be great.

Extracare4u (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Globe effect (optics)

Globe effect (optics) User:Merlitz/Globe effect (optics)

This is a new entry, related to visual optics and instrumentation

Merlitz (talk) 09:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bolt-on acquisition

Avipanda (talk) 23:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)Hello all, please review the article User:Avipanda/bolt-on acquisition and provide your values feedback.[reply]

The topic seems notable. There is no sources in the article except in the "in recent news" section, but such a section is not suitable for Wikipedia. The aticle needs wikification (i.e. links to other articles]. Sole Soul (talk) 08:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cowbell Digital Music

Hey, Any advice on my article, Cowbell Digital Music. Cowbell Digital Music http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Casey456/Cowbell_Digital_Music#Future_of_Music Casey456 (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you need to include reliable sources to establish notability, MI2N is unlikely to qualify because it allows anyone to submit their own PR or news releases and distributes them for a fee. You need to find significant independent coverage in reliable third party sources. A quick google suggests that you might struggle with this though results are of course cluttered by the SNL skitAjbpearce (talk) 14:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New article on Pt. R.K. Bijapure Indian music maestro

Dear Wiki-Experts, Pl review my article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandit_R._K._Bijapure and provide your valuable feedback...

Thanks in advance, Sharad Karve —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skarve (talk • contribs) 15:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is missing inline citations.
Contains highly subjective language like "he uses the pauses available in between to add charm to the concert" "a Russian delegation was mesmerized after listening to Panditji’s solo". Sole Soul (talk) 13:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

QualNet

Hello Folks, I created a page on QualNet User:LBrown338/QualNet. It is a well known network simulator and is woefully not represented on wikipedia. There are a lot of academic references for QualNet, some of which I've listed in the article. Please let me know if this is ready to go live. I am new to wikipedia but have been reading up on the right protocols. Your time checking this is much appreciated.

Best Regards,

LBrown338 (talk) 20:28, 14 January 2010 (UTC) Lucinda Brown 1/14/10[reply]

George T. Heery

This is the first full article I've written and wanted to open this up for review. The subject is George_T._Heery, a famous American architect who is most notable for his contributions to the foundation of the Construction Program Management industry. Regarding notability, Heery's first firm Heery International, is an internationally known company and Heery is widely known throughout the design and construction industry. I am continuing to do research to improve the article but felt that the article has reached a point where it might be ready for moving to main space soon. The one outstanding item I've marked for citation is the number of construction projects executed using a particular delivery method developed by the subject; I'm awaiting information from the General Services Adminstration, which apparently uses this process quite often. If I cannot locate information which can be cited to support that number I think that the sentence should be removed. Look forward to your help! --Drewprops (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I've gone ahead and moved the article into mainspace and have updated the link here to point to that article. Look forward to help with reviewing the article!--Drewprops (talk) 18:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

de Cusack

Can someone have a look at this article, suggest any changes necessary and help me go live with it? This is a bit of history of the the original de Cusack arrival from France to Ireland in the 12th century, the castle he built etc.

Regards C.Cleeve (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 16th Jan 2010[reply]

Hello C.Cleeve. I saw that you've created 2 pages User:C.Cleeve/De Cusack and User:C.Cleeve/de Cusack. You should assume that those who read your article are not familiar with its subject, so you need to start by giving a defenition and a clear context. To know how to create numbered footnotes and references read Help:Footnotes. Also Wikipedia:Cheatsheet is very helpful. Sole Soul (talk) 16:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Smart 2

Hi! I have been seeking help in getting my article on Jason Smart published, but have not had any luck yet. After this gets published, I am interested in helping with other articles. Can someone please review this, so that it can be published? Thank you! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Yuriipetrovich/jasonsmart --Yuriipetrovich (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment the article does not demonstrate the notability of the subject as required by WP:BIO - the sources do not provide the significant coverage in reliable sources that is necessary to show notability. – ukexpat (talk) 02:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kylerpowell/kylerpowell

```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylerpowell (talk • contribs) 04:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are the subject of the article, please read WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY - in short, you are strongly advised not to create an article about yourself, for neutrality reasons, among others. If you are notable someone will write an article about you in due course. – ukexpat (talk) 04:42, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Risk Analyses, Assessment and Management (RAAM)

User:Tvdsme1/Risk Analyses, Assessment and Management (RAAM) Tvdsme1 (talk) 15:54, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We already have several articles on risk analysis and you will find them listed on the Risk analysis disambiguation page. So I suggest that you incorporate relevant parts of your draft article into the appropriate article or articles listed there. You will however need to cite reliable sources for your edits - I note that your draft does not cite any references - and you must not add original research or your personal positions or theses. – ukexpat (talk) 16:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collapsing draft article text

Risk Analyses, Assessment and Management (RAAM)

Risk Analyses includes: Developing an Inventory of Hazards and Considering Potential Hazard Release and/or Exposure; Reviewing Circumstances that can Cause Problems (Equipment,Facilities, Automated Process Control Systems); Reviewing Tasks performed by People; Considering Potential Hazard Release and/or Exposure; Considering Potential for Incidents, (Harm to People, the Environment/Ecosystem and/or Causing Damage to Equipment/Facilities/Tools).

Risk Assessment considers: The Potential Hazard Exposure Frequency, (are Vulnerable Objects such as People, Environment/Ecosystem and/or Equipment/Facilities often Close to the Hazard?); The Hazard Severity/Significance, (how dangerous is the Hazard?); The potential Consequence, (e.g. cut in the finger versus explosion); The likelihood of a Worst Case Scenario Incident. This Worst Case Scenario Incident Must be a Realistic Scenario.

Risk Assessment may be done in a Qualitative Fashion using Tools such as Risk-Matrixes and Nomograms, it may also be that Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) is required by Law or warranted based on other considerations. QRA includes Calculations of Incident Probability/Likelihood and Potential Effects, (e.g. Gas Dispersion Models and Explosion Effect Contours/Zones).

Risk Management is: Defining Appropriate Interventions/Measures, Preventing Hazard Release/Exposure in Priority Ranking; 1.) Eliminating the Hazard, (obviously best option if possible), 2.) Defining Multiple and Appropriate Measures to contain the Hazard, (Strong Layers of Barriers in-between the Hazard and Vulnerable Objects), 3.) Defining Measures to Mitigate a Potential Consequence if the Incident Would Unexpectedly Materialize/Really Happen, (e.g. Water sprinklers mitigating the consequences of a Fire).

The TOP principle should be used for Risk Reduction Measures:

Technical measures, (e.g. Improving Equipment/Facilities, Tools, Safe Guards, Automated Process Control Systems),

Organizational measures, (e.g. Training, Procedures, Organization of Work),

Protective measures, (e.g. Personal Protective Equipment such as breathing apparatus).

Most often All Three TOP measures are Needed In Combination, (Multiple Layers of Protection/Strong Barriers in-between the Hazard and the Vulnerable Object).

David Joseph Marcou

I would like some feedback on the article User:Kayak paddler/David Joseph Marcou. I would like to know if it is neutral in tone, specific details as to notability, and formatted properly. Sincerely, --Kayak paddler (talk) 20:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In terms of style, I'd suggest breaking it up into smaller paragraphs. It's also structure as two lists--you might consider merging the two sections and rewrite it as a narrative in chronological order. Nuujinn (talk) 11:41, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your feedback. I will review the guides you suggested Sincerely, --Kayak paddler (talk) 00:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, pop me a note on my talk page when you're done if you'd like me to take another look. Nuujinn (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GameSystem

User:CubeBean/GameSystem

--CubeBean (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As an unreleased product the subject does not meet the notability requirements of WP:PRODUCT. Please also take a look at WP:CRYSTAL and WP:COI as from your talk page you clearly have one. – ukexpat (talk) 01:36, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HicCalc

Please review my article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Msmsshyam/HicCalc

User:Msmsshyam/HicCalc

Cheers, Shyam.

Msmsshyam (talk) 14:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Several problems: the article does not indicate how or why the subject is notable per WP:PRODUCT; the references do not support notability and do not appear to be reliable sources as Wikipedia uses that term, see WP:RS; as an unreleased, beta, product, it probably falls foul of WP:CRYSTAL. Once the software has been released and receive some significant coverage in reliable sources, it may be notable. – ukexpat (talk) 15:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Digital Leather

This request is for review on the Digital Leather article. I submitted the article late last week, and I haven't gotten any review on it as of yet. I look forward to your feedback.

--Azlord (talk) 16:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Azlord[reply]

The article looks good overall. There are a few bits that are ad-like, but not too many. You did well demonstrating the subject's notability, which is why it hasn't been deleted.

Citations should include, at least, the author, publisher, and access date of the page. The easiest way to properly format citations is by using citation templates, such as cite web. It may help to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners.
While you link to great reliable sources at the bottom of the page, the actual references are mainly to Discogs, which contains user submitted information. It would be wise to substitute the Discogs refs with refs to places like Phoenix New Times and Drowned in Sound.
Speaking of that Phoenix New Times article, it uses the same picture the Wikipedia article uses. Can you edit the photo page and link to the spot where the image has been released into the public domain? Wikipedia takes copyright matters seriously, and the image may otherwise soon be deleted. If you are the copyright holder or represent Digital Leather, consider using Wikipedia:Contact us/Photo submission.

Thanks for your contributions. If you have any questions related to these suggestions or editing a general, leave me a message by clicking "talk" in my signature and editing the page. Liqudluck✽talk 22:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chronicles of the Nerds

User:Emb92/Chronicles of the Nerds is an article that I am writing for a web group that creates various forms of web entertainment (like weekly podcasts). I just want to make sure that it will not get deleted for not fitting to the correct criteria. Thanks for your help. Emb92 (talk) 17:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you haven't seen it, the notability criteria for web content is located at Wikipedia:Notability (web). As it is, your article does not meet this criteria and would be quickly deleted. To demonstrate a subject's notability, an article should link to (at least) 2-3 sources independent of the subject and its creators that give the subject a more than a trivial mention. These sources may be from newspapers (excluding school newspapers) or their websites, from published books, or other reliable sources. If the web content has received an significant award or honor, a link to a site stating it has won will also demonstrate notability.

Otherwise, the article is nicely formatted (nice inline citations) but reads like an ad instead of an encyclopedia entry. Change the opening sentence to a definition of the subject (Ex. CotN is a comedy video website). Words/phrases like "meticulous", "amazing", and "foremost goal is to receive and listen avidly" are inappropriate unless a reliable source agrees. The "foremost goal is to receive and listen avidly" sounds like it should be attributed as a quote from someone.

Good luck! If you have questions about these suggestions or editing in general, click the "talk" in my signature and leave me a message. Liqudluck✽talk 20:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stefanir/Center_for_Higher_Education_Policy_Analysis

I have gotten no feedback on this article. Does that mean it is ready to go? Please review. Thanks.

Stefanir (talk) 19:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Does that mean it is ready to go?" Unfortunately, not necessarily. We have a large backlog of requests, and a shortage of editors dealing with them, and sometimes it takes a long time for a request to be dealt with. I have had a quick look at your draft article.

The general style and character of the article is fine: far better than is the case with many new articles, but some work needs to be done, particularly on the references.

You have clearly put some effort into providing references, but unfortunately some of them do not serve the purpose for which references are intended. For example, http://www.acenet.edu/resources/policy-research/index.cfm just links to an index and search page, which does not contain any information about CHEPA. It may well be that, by searching from there, it is possible to find confirmation of what you say in your draft, but a reference should take us directly to the relevant information, not just point us to somewhere we can search from. Then we have a link to a Google books page about a book which is mentioned in your draft. However, that Google page does not confirm the statement to which the reference is attached, namely "The Center's blog entitled 21st Century Scholar regularly features the work of guest scholars from around the country, including Yvonna Lincoln, co-author of Naturalistic Inquiry". The point of a reference is to show a source which confirms the statement made in the article, not just to give a link to something which is mentioned in that statement. Likewise the statement "The center is run by Dr. William G. Tierney, University Professor and Wilbur-Kieffer Professor of Higher Education at the Rossier School of Education" is followed by a reference to a page which mentions Tierney but does not tell us that the center is run by him, which is what the sentence says to which this is supposed to be a reference. Likewise the statement that Tierney "is the author of more than 16 books on higher education and the editor of more than 40 books, monographs and journals" is followed by a reference to a page which does not mention the number of his publications. So it goes on. Also, some of the information given is of marginal relevance: for example, the fact that Tierney runs the center is clearly of direct relevance to the article, but how many publications he has is of direct relevance to him, but only indirect relevance to an article on the center. Of course there is always an element of judgement as to how direct the connection has to be, but I do not think this information is relevant enough to justify inclusion, and the same applies to some other statements.

References should establish two things: (1) there is substantial independent coverage of the topic, to show that the topic is notable enough to have an article about it, and (2) the statements in the article can be verified from reliable sources. The requirements for these two purposes are a little different. The second purpose can often be achieved by references from sources from the subject of the article, or sources related to it (in this case sources from CHEPA, USC, etc). However, for establishing notability independent sources are essential, and at present these are lacking.

I hope these remarks have been helpful. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Challenge Series

The Challenge Series- a seven part book about the sustainable construction of the 2010 Olympic Village in Vancouver, Canada. An overview of the book, including content, contributors and sponsors. The Challenge Series Ashlee Jollymore, January 18 2010 Lunette 18 (talk) 20:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The main issue here is the "sponsorship" section, which an entire section of external links. Please see WP:EL and WP:NOTLINK for more details. -Reconsider! 05:08, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SME Dynamic Systems LTD

User:Const mc/SME Dynamic Systems LTD

Hello, this is my first article, I've tried to add information about a ukrainian game development company. Please give some feedback on it. Am I moving in the right direction?

Const mc (talk) 22:14, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bad start, you are definitely heading in the right direction. Next step would be to expand the article and find some more references. -Reconsider! 09:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at WP:CORP. At the moment I see nothing in the article to indicate that the subject meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for companies. You will need some robust references from reliable sources to support notability. – ukexpat (talk) 17:55, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nuzhat J. Haneef

Hello Wiki editors,

I would be really appreciate any feedback on my draft article.

User:Wixnstuff/Nuzhat J. Haneef ‎

Oh! And in the first paragraph of my draft I wrote:

Proper title noted as: Recognizing the Messiah. Assessing Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qaadiyaan: His Claims, His Views, His Character, and His Movement (Published September 2004).

How do I link the title of the book to reference link below that I have in the External Links section? Or do I even need to do that?

Thanks for help. Keep up the good work!

Wixnstuff (talk) 07:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Wixnstuff[reply]

You could use {{cite book}} and fill in the appropriate fields as specified on the template page. Then put that between a ref and a /ref tag, which i see you already know how to do. You could also use that for other books mentioned in the (would-be) article.

However, there are larger problems than this.

One is that you appear to be writing an article about yourself. As you will see in our autobiography guideline, this is strongly discouraged. (If I am mistaken here, my apologies.)
Another is that the article as written is in form a biographical article but seems to be more about the book than about the author. If the main subject is the book, make it an article about the book.
A third, and larger yet, is that you need some independent reliable sources about the book and the author. You cite some sources (although how independent and reliable they are I can't judge) about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, who is the subject of Recognizing the Messiah, but none about the book or about Nuzhat J. Haneef, who is supposedly the subject of this article. Perhaps you should create an article about Mirza Ghulam Ahmad? As far as one can tell from this article Recognizing the Messiah could be a self-published book that no one has heard of. If it is, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. If it isn't, publication details (publisher, ISBN, etc) and citations of independent reviews or discussions of the book would help establish its notability, and published discussion of Nuzhat J. Haneef would help establish her notability, as suggested in our notability guideline for biographies. Addressing the issue of cited sources is far more vital than any formatting issues for this would-be article.

I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 15:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Werd (S.O.S)

Draft page: User:Mike n jack/Werd (S.O.S) —Preceding undated comment added 16:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC).

This is actually pretty good for a new article, with reasonable inline references cited. You could use {{cite web}} and {{cite news}} in place of bare URLs, but that is a minor issue. It would be nice to see a cite for "appearing on national UK radio and international hip-hop stations in Germany, Norway, France and US." as that would significantly help establish notability. Do read WP:BAND and WP:MUSIC, the specialized notability guidelines in theis subject area. One possible problem is that i can't be sure which of the sites linked to are independent, WP:Reliable sources. An interview isn't independent, but its intro may be, except that http://www.planeturban.com.au/features/interview_werd looks like a blog post, which would usually make it not "reliable". If planeturban in general and this page in particular pass WP:RS, a note on the talk page User talk:Mike n jack/Werd (S.O.S) explaining why would be helpful. So would any comments on the reliable source status of Red Hot Velvet. Obviously cites from the record company aren't independent but are fine for establishing basic facts such as release dates and titles. The cite to http://www.leith.co.uk/ isn't particularly useful -- better would be a cite directly to the page where the project is mentioned and Werd's participation is discussed. http://ukhiphopmixtapes.blogspot.com/2009/12/certified-celtic-connection.html seems to be a blog, hence not normally considered reliable, and doesn't currently seem to mention Werd anyway. I sugest removing this reference or else linking directly to the p[articualr post or page where Werd is mentioned, and including a talk page note about why this particular blog is reliable (witten by an acknowledged, published expert on the subject, for example), if it is.

I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 17:29, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Qigong Sensory Training

Any suggestions or feedback on my article would be greatly appreciated. It's my first one!

Krisgab (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a direct link for reviewers- User:Krisgab/QST. Liquidluck✽talk 04:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Technically this is not a bad start. There is a paragraph duplicated in the introductory section (often called "the lede" on Wikipedia) and the "Theory" section. This should be at lest reworded in one place, or not repeated. One issue is that this seems exclusively positive, particularly for what seems a form of Alternative medicine. Have there been no criticism or negative opinions on this method? If there have been, the should be reported in the name of maintaining balance and a neutral point of view. Another possible problem is that most, perhaps all, of the sources seem to be written or co-authored by L. Silva. Has this method been independently discussed by anyone else? How widely accepted is this method? We need to be particularly careful on medical topics to distinguish between mainstream views, fringe views, one-man theories, and minority but widely supported views. Also, the one web site linked and some of the refernces' titles seem to imply that this treatment method is the proprietary method of L. Silva and those associated with him/her, or is pretty much solely advocated by such people. If so, the cited references are mostly not independent, which lowers there reliability for this purpose. If L. Silva and his/her associates are the sole advocates of this method, that should be stated, for example "Qigong Sensory Training is a specific application from the branch of Chinese Medicine devised and promoted by L. Silva that utilizes..." if there are any truly independent sources that discuss this, they should be added. There should be a clearer statement as to how widely accepted this method is. Good work so far. DES ^(talk) 17:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. This is very helpful! I'll work on incorporating your suggestions. Krisgab (talk) 18:21, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the edits suggested by Liquidluck. If Liquidluck or anyone else could look at it one more time, I'd greatly appreciate it!Krisgab (talk) 20:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It still seems very promotional, or at least one-sided. There is still no mention of any criticism, nor of reactions of the wider medical community, positive or negative. Six of the eight cited sources have "Silva, L." as an author or co-author. One of the remaining two is published by the "Qigong Institute" which doesn't exactly sound independent of the concept. The concluding statement "Treatments based on Chinese medicine are directed to the cause of an illness rather than the symptoms, and, when given for a sufficient length of time, provide lasting change." should probably be qualified with "according to its advocates" or some such, and in any case cited. DES ^(talk) 19:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the first paragraph in the "Theory" section is still very similar in wording to the introductory paragraph, which makes it seem repetitious to a reader. DES ^(talk) 19:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Buddhist Academy

Hi all,

Seeking feedback on a new article on Pacific Buddhist Academy, a Buddhist high school in Hawaii. I have yet to upload the logo and some related images, but otherwise I'm ready to turn it loose.

Thanks for any insights...

Kawiki808 (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty good for a start. Has the needed sections and some inline references, and enough references for basic support. It would be nice if facts outside the introductory section were referenced. The misison statement, as a quote, should have a cited source for example. It would be nice if there were citations for the outside financial support, the Curriculum the Peace Education section, and the demographics would be better if supported by a reference.

The text "Pacific Buddhist Academy teachers combine traditional college preparatory content with group projects and a global, applied approach to learning. Teachers aim to recognize and build upon students’ individual learning processes as students are taught to think critically, creatively, and to collaborate. Basic Buddhist principles including interdependence, compassion, mindfulness, and gratitude are integrated into all courses and throughout the daily life of the school." sounds like a quote from the school. If it is, it should be cited.

However not of those cites are essential before moving to article space. But if any of the content is taken directly from the school web site or other documents, it should be rewritten or converted to a sourced and attributed quote before this goes live.

Oh overall the tone is a bit promotional and should be made more objective.

I hope this helps. DES ^(talk) 23:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nebraska Compromise

Hi.

I created my first article and would love some feedback on it. The article is called Nebraska Compromise in my user space.

Thanks for your feedback.

Cwikib (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically User:Cwikib/Nebraska Compromise DES ^(talk) 23:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "Nebraska Compromise" does not appear in any of the news sources currently cited as references in the would-be article. The page says "Nebraska Compromise is the name coined for a deal made by U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid" but does not say who coind the name, nor provide any cited examples of anyone using this name. One source said: "Critics were calling it the 'cornhusker kickback' and the 'Nebraska windfall,'..." but does not say who those critics might be, and does not use the term "Nebraska Compromise". The use, indeed the fairly common use, of this term ought to be documented by cites to reliable sources for this to go live. If possible, a cite indicating who originaly coined the phrase would be a good idea.

In addition, I think there have been significant new developments that modified the "Compromise" which are not included in the article as it now stands. DES ^(talk) 19:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jed Riffe

How can I post an article about a PBS filmmakers? Can someone check it out and post it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zb12st12/JedRiffe

thank you zb12st12 01-20-2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zb12st12 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Requested articles DES ^(talk) 19:16, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The National Institute for Metalworking Skills

User:Nims22030/new NIMS - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nims22030 (talk • contribs)

Draft article

The National Institute for Metalworking Skills (NIMS) was formed in 1995 by the metalworking trade associations to develop and maintain globally competitive American workforce. NIMS sets skills standards for the industry, certifies individual skills against the standards and accredits training programs that meet NIMS quality requirements.

NIMS operates under rigorous and highly disciplined processes as the only developer of American National Standards for the nation’s metalworking industry accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).

NIMS Stakeholders

NIMS has a stakeholder base of over 6,000 metalworking companies. The major trade associations in the industry- the Association for Manufacturing Technology, the American Machine Tool Distributors' Association, the National Tooling & Machining Association, the Precision Machine Products Association, the Precision Metalforming Association, and the Tooling and Manufacturing Association have invested over $7.5 million in private funds for the development of the NIMS standards and its credentials. The associations also contribute annually to sustain NIMS operations and are committed to the upgrading and maintenance of the standards.

NIMS Program Accreditation

NIMS accredits training programs that meet its quality requirements. The NIMS accreditation requirements include an on-site audit and evaluation by a NIMS industry team that reviews and conducts on-site inspections of all aspects of the training programs, including administrative support, curriculum, plant, equipment and tooling, student and trainee progress, industry involvement, instructor qualifications and safety.

Officials governing NIMS accredited programs report annually on progress and are subject to re-accreditation on a five year cycle. As of December 31, 2006 there were 162 NIMS accredited programs in operation. An additional 86 institutions and firms were in the process of completing the accreditation process.

There are 105 certified NIMS Team Leaders from private industry who lead the on-site audits.

NIMS Competency-based Apprenticeship System

NIMS has launched a new Competency-based Apprenticeship System for the nation’s metalworking industry. The NIMS system represents a dramatic departure from the time based system and integrates the NIMS national standards and skill certifications in defining and measuring required competencies.

Developed in partnership with the United States Department of Labor, the new system is the result of two years of work. Over 300 companies participated in the deliberations and design.

The new National Guideline Standards for NIMS Competency-based Apprenticeship have been approved by the Department of Labor. NIMS has trained Department of Labor apprenticeship staff at the national and state level in the new system.

Governance

NIMS is governed by a 24 person Board of Directors, the majority of whom are metalworking company executives. The Board also has representatives from training institutions, education, state government and organized labor.

NIMS financial operations are audited and reported annually in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133 and the provisions of the Single Audit Act.

Homepage: http://www.nims-skills.org FAQs: https://www.nims-skills.org/web/nims/39 [[Category:Articles created via the Article Wizard]]

Edwin James (scientist)

Edwin James was the first white person to climb Colorado's Pikes Peak; he is referenced repeatedly in that article, and in the article about the Ojibwe language. Thank you for your feedback.

Edwin James (scientist)

Aiken1986 (talk) 02:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. I removed the tag and made a few minor formatting changes. – ukexpat (talk) 04:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Baron french actress in True Blood

Hi

I have just created a new article about Jeanne Baron a french upcoming actress who is Guest Staring in the TV series True blood on HBO. My name cindaim and Wiklink Jeanne Baron Talk:Jeanne Baron —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindaim (talk • contribs) 05:30, 22 January 2010 (UTC) She was also known as Cindy-Jeanne Meslem and hosted different TV shows in France.[reply]

Filmography includes:

"True Blood" (2009-2010) "Since: A Sci Fi Short Film" (2010) "Man Without a Head" (2009) "Bouge ta science" (2006-2008) "Les folles inventions du professeur Cogito" (2007) "Gloire et fortune: la grande imposture" (2004) "Casting Live" (2002) "Hit beach" (2002) "Zéro de conduite" (2002) "Clip combat" (2001)

And here is a link to a Imdb to see her pics and resume

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1770506/

I do believe she is the new french revelation of hollywood!

I am waiting for your feedbacks guys!

Cindaim —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cindaim (talk • contribs) 05:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Implicit learning

Implicit learning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_learning
--Alok Kumar Mishra 09:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anticipator (talk • contribs)

Divorce Fairs

User:Suzymiller/Divorce Fairs

I would like to develop the draft article on Divorce Fairs which are now occurring throughout the world and yet have no information I could find on Wikipedia. I have posted a short history of divorce fairs and information about the first one in Austria (first in the world) and first one in the UK in 2009. I am interested in bringing together more information on this international phenomenon because I myself (as a single mum who went through breakup) created the first ever divorce fair in the UK.

Comments and contributions welcomed.

Suzymiller (talk) 23:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is really hard to review this article since there are not inline citations for verification. I honestly expect it to meet the notability guidelines. It really is just inappropriate without the references. One thing that jumped out besides the references:

You should trim out the end bits regarding the history of divorce. The scope of the article should be the conventions and not divorce in general

Take the citations used (plus more that are independent of the subject) and write a piece about the organizers and why the media (easiest) has said the fairs are noteworthy. Don't go as far as forcing notability. Just find some independent coverage (a write up in a newspaper for example) and cater the article to general info (not marketing). Feel free to shoot me a message or mention it here if you need a hand on the technical side of using inline citations and expressing notability in a neutral manner. Cptnono (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Slade Architecture

User:Nicole700/new article name here

Nicole700 (talk) 00:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very promotional in tone, reads like a company handout or a page of a company website. Please read WP:NPOV, and if you work for or with Slade, please also read WP:COI. May well be notable, there seems a fair amount of coverage, but as written this just won't do - in fact it is near the boarder of speedy deletion in my view. Please read Wikipedia:Spam. DES ^(talk) 23:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trimatrix data warehousing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sysgentvl/new_article_name_here

Trimatrix

This is my first article. Can you please review and tell me how to make this article "encyclopaedic" ? Thanks in anticipation. --Sysgentvl (talk) 08:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a bout a specific software product. It needs more context in the intro paragraph, but most of all it needs references from independent third-party reliable sources that show why this particular software is Notable.

Statements like "Top management can take policy decisions based on Trimatrix reports." sound like advertising.

Relevant terms and firm names should be wikilinked, for example "Cognos, Business Objects, SAS (Statistical Analysis System) and such other Business Intelligence (BI) tools" Not also that this sentence confuses tools and the companies that make them.

Text like "Using the existing systems, the top and middle management teams across the organizations in an enterprise are still not able to review an individual unit’s performance. Managers always want reports to be verified by junior. The reports are static and the supervisor cannot add comments or questions. The junior cannot attach in reply documents or presentations in a report for review. Any new report or analysis or new module takes months for the IT team to get ready." is original research unless these vies can be attributed to a named source in a citation to a published comment.

the section "more features added" particularly reads like an advertisement.

The "Triangulation" section does not explain how the three figures are supposed to confirm each other or are checked against each other.

Also if you work for or with the makers of this product, please read our conflict of interest page. DES ^(talk) 03:51, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure: I am an employee of Cognos, and apparently the product described here competes with some of the products made by Cognos. DES ^(talk) 03:36, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bumper pool

I have begun to do some copy edits and would like some feedback on the article Bumper_pool. Is this article appropriate in tone and style? Any suggestions for how to improve the quality of the prose would be appreciated,
Nuujinn (talk) 19:46, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty good to me. I have added some references and used those and the reference sources already present to cite may statemetns previously uncited. A section on the history of the game would not be amiss, IMO. DES ^(talk) 22:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help. I agree about the history, I'll see what I can find, but I'm really just trying to help out with the copy editing

Nuujinn (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a history page at the cited vendor site, but much of it is covered by the history sections in the articels on the class of games. DES ^(talk) 23:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Beatnicks

Please ignore - this title seems to be used before and deleted. Will repost under a new page name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaVulture (talk • contribs) 21:50, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the following wiki page written about the feature film the Beatnicks —Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaVulture (talk • contribs) 21:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mean User:MediaVulture/The Beatnicks? Please take a look at our guidelines for the notability of films at WP:NFILMS. As currently drafted it does not appear that the film is notable and therefore does not meet Wikipedia's principal inclusion criterion. – ukexpat (talk) 20:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sigi Schmid

Hi request for feedback watchers. I sometimes poke around here and noticed that it is usually new articles that get listed. I was considering bypassing GA and going feedback->PR->FA as is mentioned at Wikipedia:Peer review. A handful of editors are going for featured topic with Seattle Sounders FC, and I wanted to get some fresh eyes on an article. Knowing me, there should be plenty of grammatical screw ups. General layout, wikifying, and other fun stuff might also be a concern. Anyone feel like offering some feedback to make Sigi Schmid a quality article? Thanks!Cptnono (talk) 12:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Wynne Pace

User:HeatherSophia/NatalieWynnePace

````HeatherSophia, 20100125 —Preceding unsigned comment added by HeatherSophia (talk • contribs) 15:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This reads as rather promotional, a more objective tone would be helpful. Are there no negative facts or criticism that are well sourced? The Manual of Style recommends against curly or angled quotes, i have changed them to straight quotes. That "Every cent you own and every moment you spend is always an investment." is her favorite quote should be cited, and is it her statement originally or a quote from someone else that she favors? "Dr. Gary Becker (Nobel Prize winning economist and University Professor, Department of Economics and Sociology Professor at the Graduate School of Business, The University of Chicago)" is excessive qualification in a parenthesis, i edited to link to Gary Becker, remove the Dr (which wikipedia does not use as an academic title in general), and limit the text to mentioning the Nobel prize, which is quite sufficient to establish his emenince, readres interested in more detail can follow the link. WP:MOSTM says "Do not use the ™ and ® symbols, or similar, in either article text or citations, unless unavoidably necessary for context". I have removed a tm symbol. Who says she is "a trusted source of financial news."? cite needed. I also added several wiki-links, more are probably needed. DES ^(talk) 02:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gewald/iKnowWare could use some feedback

User:Gewald/iKnowWare Is this close to being ready to go public? What should I add if not? This is my first contribution.

Gewald (talk) 16:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In view of its Forbes thing, the company is probably notable as required by WP:CORP. However, the tone of the article is too promotional and sounds like it was lifted straight out of the company's marketing literature. It will need to be toned down before it is moved to the mainspace. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pkimmel/DevExpress

This page provides information about the software company developer express. There are references, citations, internal, and external links. I'd appreciate a sanity check before publishing it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pkimmel/DevExpress#References

Pkimmel (talk) 18:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Kimmel

There is a referencing problem at the moment. All of your references are to either the company's own web site, to press releases, or to blog/forum posts. To verify an award by SD magazine, you should link to a page from SD that reports the award, or if that is not online, state the issue and date where this was announced. The same for ASP.NET Pro Magazine. References to third-party, independent, reliable sources are vital to establish notability. I suspect that this firm is actually notable, but you haven't yet provided the sources to demonstrate this.

Also, Wikipedia articles should never be used as references. They can be linked in the body of the article or in a see also section.

I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 18:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Komowkwa/Robert M. Strozier

This is my first article and it concerns the person for whom the main FSU library is named.

Komowkwa (talk) 01:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks pretty good. I have taken the liberty to format the citations with proper citation templates, and use named references to indicate where a give source supports multiple statements in the article. I also did some minor copyediting.

There might be more about what Strozier did during his term as president. You might have a look at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&cf=all&ned=us&hl=en&q=Robert+M.+Strozier (google news archive search)

The paragraph about the CIA connection is a bit dubious here since there is no statement that Strozier was involved with the CIA aspect while he was a member of the advisory council of the National Student Association, nor that the revelations were connected with him or affected his reputation in any way. What does the CIA involvement with the National Student Association have to do with Strozier? You don't say, nor do your sources.

Still I think this is ready to be moved to the main article space. Notability seems obvious DES ^(talk) 09:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, there is apparently a different Robert M. Strozier (a son?) who has written severla scholarly books, see http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=au%3A%22Strozier%2C+Robert+M.%22&qt=hot_author

I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 09:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spending your time on this. I really appreciate this and will follow up regarding your suggestions.

I was at FSU from 1964 through the end of 1974. When the CIA stuff came out in 1967, it was a pretty hot topic. I recall that the school planned to drop out of the NSA which they had joined while Strozier was President. However, I looked a little bit for some current references regarding the CIA/NSA stuff and did not find what I was looking for in the newspaper archives. I remember that there were some news reports on the subject and my search did find a reference for one of the statements in another article regarding the CIA. I think I can hold that section out of this article for now and will try to figure out how to "move" this to the main article space.Komowkwa (talk) 02:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It might well justify an article of its own, but the relevance to Strozier is not established by the cites in the article so far. I see you did the move just fine DES ^(talk) 14:10, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SmartSignal

The article is posted at: User:Jwkerastas/SmartSignal

The name of the article is SmartSignal Corporation.

Jwkerastas (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Jwkerastas, January 27, 2010[reply]

I apologize if I haven't correctly provided the correct information - this is my first article for Wikipedia!

A reasonable start. There are several major issues, however:

Notability. You cite several references but since they are not online (or links are not provided) it is hard to say if these are in-depth coverage or passing mentions. Relevant quotes, if sources are not online can help. Remember that articles should pass the general notability guideline.
Formatting. Most of the article is now in an outline style. This should all be expanded into prose (or dropped where overly detailed) before the article goes live.
References. See our citation policy, which supports our verifiability policy. If much of the outline is expanded there will be lots of facts in need of supporting citations from reliable sources. Note that awards should be supported with citations to independent sources, not company pages, documents, or press releases, whenever possible.

Also, if you work for or with the company, you should read our conflict of interest policy and be very careful if it applies to you and this subject.

I'm afraid this is a long way from begin ready to go live.

I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 20:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank your for the feedback! I will redouble my efforts to learn how to do this properly. I will a) add links for references, b) transform the outline format into prose, and c) better integrate references. I used to work for SmartSignal, which is how I learned about it's technology, but left in March 2007. Jwkerastas Jwkerastas (talk) 20:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DESiegel|DES,

I've tried to follow your instructions but seem to have goofed up the structuring of my references - can you please help? Jwkerastas 18:49, 28 January 2010 Jwkerastas Jwkerastas (talk) 00:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will attempt to assist. DES ^(talk) 16:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAT TONE

(FAT TONE User:Originalrecordz/Fat-Tone)

17:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)BiggKhrisco (talk)

American Idiot (musical)

This is just a general request for feedback. I started this page in the fall of 2009 when it became clear that the musical was going to have some life. It's now heading for Broadway and is scheduled to officially open on April 24. Could a few people take a look at the article to offer some suggestions for improvement. I know the plot section is totally unsourced, and I'm working on that. But with a Broadway launch imminent, this article is bound to see a lot more traffic and I want it to be as good as possible before that.

Thanks

Fryede (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you said, you need to source the plot section. If you can find a source saying that the musical will follow the plot of the album, the such a source about the plot of the album could suffice. OTher than that, very good article.BillyJack193 (talk) 22:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jhuber08/TeamDynamixHE

--Jhuber08 (talk) 20:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Curotek

User:Alfresearch/Curotek

This is a new article relating to one of the providers of assisted living technologies.

Alfresearch (talk) 22:41, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Balance

Hi, just finished writing an article on a well-known Canadian rock band

The name of the article is called The Balance

User:The Balance Music/The Balance

Thanks for your time, and looking forward hearing from you!!

The Balance Music (talk)User:The Balance Music 10:50 (EST) Jan 27/2010

It's not immediately clear to me that the band meets the notability requirements set out at WP:BAND, or that either of the albums meets the requirements for albums set out at WP:NALBUM. So before any of these are moved you will need to cite significant coverage in reliable sources demonstrating their notability. – ukexpat (talk) 17:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 flu pandemic in Taiwan

2009 flu pandemic in Taiwan 2009 flu pandemic in Taiwan Angelaseh (talk) 08:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martino Tirimo

User:Jowilson55/Martino Tirimo

This is my first Wikipedia article so I just want to check I'm along the right lines. There are no references because I've only used Tirimo's website for information (with permission), which is posted in the External links section anyway.

Many thanks

Joanna

Jowilson55 (talk) 10:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The subject's own website is often not a reliable source. You need better sources for most of his claims and assertions. See other tags on the article now. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Navy Hospital Charleston History

Navy Hospital Charleston History User:Garyrg398/Navy_Hospital_Charleston_History Garyrg398 (talk) 18:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Prosec/FGH Security Ltd

FGH Security is a new Wikilink I have posted - any feedback wourld be appreciated on it.

Prosec (talk) 12:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Prosec 29/01/10[reply]

See User talk:Prosec/FGH Security Ltd. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:36, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of major problems: first, the draft does not indicate how or why the company is notable per the guidelines set out at WP:CORP; second, it is too promotional in tone - it reads like a company marketing piece. So at this stage I would not recommend moving it to the mainspace as it would probably be speedily deleted. – ukexpat (talk) 16:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge Innovation Center (CIC)

User:CambridgeQueen/Sandbox Cambridge Innovation Center

CambridgeQueen (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First_Unitarian_Church_of_Memphis

Please review my Wikipedia article; this is the first one I have ever created. Thank you very much.

First Unitarian Church of Memphis

User:RoseyCat/First Unitarian Church of Memphis

RoseyCat (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC)16:21, 29 January 2010 (CST)[reply]

I'm new at this, but I think if you drop the "we" and put it all in third person, and get references from outside of wikipedia, you're off to a good start. Where you have references to wikipedia, use the internal link format using brackets, but you need some verifiable sources from newspapers, books, and the like. Nice start! Nuujinn (talk) 02:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that I made the recommended changes. However, I am uncertain about the formatting of my reference and hope that it is correct.RoseyCat (talk) 00:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good improvements! I took the liberty of working on the references in the first couple of paragraphs, and editing the external links. For internal references to wikipedia, just put the article name in double brackets, and if that doesn't work in the flow of the paragraph, use a bar to separate the article name and the text you'd like to appear, eg." Cats are popular pets." For links to outside sources, see WP:cite, but I put in an example for you. Hope that helps, Nuujinn (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blufeld

User:Illumini08/Blufeld

Helo everyone, I have just completed an article on an artist named Blufeld (David Hearn) and would appreciate your judgement and feedback on its content and layout. Thank you for your time!

Best Regards, Diana Bauer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Illumini08 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Russell.Shackleton/Sandbox

I would appreciate comments on my article which is Little Smalltalk 3.04 DOS. I would like to link to it from the Little_Smalltalk topic eventually. kta0410 (talk) 08:01, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Couple of major problems: first, the draft does not indicate how or why the subject matter is notable as described in WP:N and further in WP:PRODUCT - it will need significant coverage in reliable sources to show notability; second; half of the draft looks like a how-to, and that is not suitable for Wikipedia per WP:HOWTO. – ukexpat (talk) 16:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marijan Dundek

Marijan Dundek (This is appearing in red so I must be doing something wrong in this link)

Big apologies for posting this twice - I accidentally merged it with someone else's query above mine (User: Mysdaao) which was checked 'Resolved', so I was afraid if I didn't post it again it wouldn't be seen as the editors would think it was all part of that other query. Very sorry for the confusion! My new comments are below, starting with 'Thank you for your prompt feedback'.

Hello, I have created a new entry which is currently in draft form at

User:Meechpod/Marijan Dundek

I've tried to find the answers to the following questions but I'm afraid I got lost in the many different help sections. My main questions are:

How do I upload the two images? (public domain)

How do I add the subject category?

There are probably some other issues that need fixing, like the format of the links in References and External Links.

I think that once these issues are resolved, the article is ready for going live.

Thank you for your help. I look forward to hearing from you.

Meechpod (talk) 12:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You add categories by typing eg. [[Category:1950 births]] at the bottom of the page for each category that you want the article to appear in. It's best not to do this until the article is "live".

For help formating your references, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. You especially need to make sure that you reference his "claims to fame" so to speak - say who thinks he's an authority, where does it say his book is the top-selling one, the most popular etc.

By the way, to link to an article or page here, like you have done above, you just need to enclose the name in two square brackets, eg. [[User:Meechpod/new article name here]] gives User:Meechpod/new article name here.

Hope this helps, --Beloved Freak 13:07, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(after edit conflict) I'll leave the upload question to somebody more familiar with that than I am; but are you sure the pictures are public domain? You'll need to demonstrate that. (If you're planning to use the photo of the Lesotho Promise from the Jewellery Outlook article, that appears to belong to Graff Diamonds).

You add an article to a category by inserting [[Category:<category name>]] anywhere in it - usually at the bottom.

There are indeed issues which need fixing, so that the article is not ready for going live. The minor point is that the language is not encyclopaedic: please read WP:PEACOCK. The more serious one is that there are no independent, substantial references to reliable sources. While the article does implicitly assert the subject's notability as the author of a significant book, you need to establish his notability, and meet the stringent requirements of WP:BLP or the article will certainly be nominated for deletion as non-notable. --ColinFine (talk) 13:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt feedback. I have removed 'peacock' terms such as 'top-selling' and 'popular' ('top-selling' was included on the basis of the book having the top spot in the Amazon ranking of books of this subject matter -- is that allowed to be mentioned?).

I read the section WP:BLP and it seems that the subject meets these criteria, as his book has been judged notable in its field by the organizations mentioned and peer reviews (such as the two cited in references). I'm not clear as to why these two sources do not qualify as independent, reliable references, as they come from independent published sources.

I don't believe I have other source material I can add, so please tell me if you feel the article does not merit inclusion on the basis of the references given so far and I will delete it. Thank you for your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meechpod (talk • contribs) 18:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meechpod (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Memorial Laws: Laws Dedicated to the Memory of a Victim

Draft text added by Fleibman (talk • contribs) 20:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to user subpage: User:Fleibman/Memorial Laws. – ukexpat (talk) 20:29, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsay Vickery

Requesting review of the entry on the Australian composer Lindsay Vickery 124.182.21.77 (talk) 08:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vokab Kompany

Vokab Kompany User:Steviebeatbox/Vokab Kompany

Steviebeatbox (talk) 08:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't figure out how to construct the box at the upper right corner of the page with band/musician info. I tried copying another bands from the sandbox, then replacing the pertinent information, but no luck. Would appreciate feedback. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steviebeatbox (talk • contribs) 16:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC) Steviebeatbox (talk) 06:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at Wikipedia's inclusion criteria for bands set out at WP:BAND - the band does not appear to be notable per this guideline. – ukexpat (talk) 15:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Leeds Look

I would be grateful for feedback on this article.

I was surprised that the "Leeds Look" was not mentioned in the existing Architecture of Leeds article but if my stuff was merged in to this there would be a danger of the article becoming too long especially as I have some other potential bits and pieces about Leeds architectural history that could be added. So should my article remain separate with a link from the Architecture of Leeds article? EricPolymath (talk) 14:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good! – ukexpat (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Michael C. Ain

User:Jaynamller/new article name here gives general information about the only surgeon in America who is a dwarf. (Jaynamller (talk) 16:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Jayna Miller, January 31, 2010) I would appreciate editorial comments on the article. Thank you so much![reply]

I have reviewed the draft and as you will see I have made some formatting and other layout edits, and added some wikilinks. I have also added some inline tags identifying some issues, but generally you will need to find some sources that support the statements made and further demonstrate his notability. Also, I see you have some references in {{ }} - take a look at WP:FOOTNOTES and WP:CITE for help with formatting references or leave a note on my talk page if you need help figuring it out. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 19:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895)

Just want to see what needs to be done to improve this before CSD can be survived. Have already added infobox based on User:Sturmvogel 66's comment. User:Buggie111/ Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895) Buggie111 (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it should be 1892, not 95 Buggie111 (talk) 00:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sherif Sonbol

Sherif Sonbol (Egyptian photographer). Someone else already did a small article in German, so I've been working in the English version and would appreciate someone's opinion to see if I can put this one on up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Welle_1/Sherif_Sonbol

Thanks, --Welle 1 (talk) 20:51, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The career section is problematic, that kind of details is not needed nor suitable for Wikipedia. You should avoid words like Unfortunately, and sentences like "he managed to shake the foundations of Egyptian interior photography". See WP:Peacock. Sole Soul (talk) 22:43, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks will work on it. Will try to re-locate and add some of the Arabic original references (like the interior photography comment). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Welle 1 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Realtek Media Player

Hi,

The Realtek Media Player page has been deleted, I created this : User:Bikepunk2/Realtek_Media_Player Since this software exist and is actually installed on a lot of computers, people might want to know what AvRack is about (if the article is ok, I'll make a redirect from AvRack) and expect to find an answer on wikipedia. I just would like to know if it's ok, then I publish it or not. Thanks in advance for your time. Bikepunk2 (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:ITEXISTS section in the essay about the arguments you should avoid in deletion discussions. The article does not cite any independent reliable source. Sole Soul (talk) 22:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Central Church of Christ (Paducah,KY)

Just need someone to look at my article. It's not long, but it's short sweet and to the point. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandrivers,ky (talk • contribs) 22:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is short and to the point. I think you might consider casting the sentence beginning with "You" to a more neutral phrasing. It would also be nice if you could include some references about the church, from say local newspapers, and perhaps some links to other articles in wikipedia for context (such as any general articles on the Church of Christ). Post a note on my talk pages if you'd like any additional help. Nuujinn (talk) 23:55, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ramon Naval Guico

Ramon Naval Guico Ramon Naval Guico --121.1.18.242 (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed, removed the tag, cleaned up the text a little and added some categories. I also added project templates to the talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Demonicld/Konstantinos Fotiadis

please make my article exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Demonicld (talk • contribs) 13:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but this individual does not meet Wikipedia's notability requirements - please take a look at WP:N and WP:BIO. – ukexpat (talk) 15:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Freelance Whales

Hello, this is the first article I've written and would appreciate advice of whether it is ready to post as an official wikipedia page (it is currently a user space draft)

User:Ledhotjimipepper/Freelance Whales

--Ledhotjimipepper (talk) 14:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs significant work. The band does not appear (from the article) to meet notability guidelines - see WP:BAND. (GregJackP (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Transatlantic Literary Studies

User:English 468/Transatlantic literary studies

This article's purpose is to introduce some of the theories and basic introductory information on the relatively new way of studying literature in a transatlantic context. This was compiled by a college class, and I could use some help with some feedback. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by English 468 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This reads like an essay for a university course, rather than an encyclopedia article. Nuujinn (talk) 01:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HOMER:_Micropower_energy_modeling_software

hi, I would appreciate some feedback on this article: User:Cruciblecom/HOMER:_Micropower_energy_modeling_software . I think this topic belongs in Wikipedia because there are many thousands of people around the world using this free software, and it facilitates the integration of multiple power sources in an energy system, specifically conventional and renewables. The software is available for free and is often used in developing countries.

If I can figure it out I'm going to add some pictures to the story.

Many thanks! Lili —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cruciblecom (talk • contribs) 23:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a little reformatting per the Manual of Style. Also at the moment the article is a little promotional in tone (for example, use of the circle-R, which I have removed), and will need to be toned down accordingly. A few more cited sources would be good too. – ukexpat (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Microscan Systems, Inc.

Microscan Systems, Inc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tstraws/Microscan_Systems,_Inc.

Tabitha Straws 2/1/1010Tstraws (talk) 23:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two major problems: first it is very promotional in tone - the opening sentence is right out of the Marketing 101 handbook; second, you need to cite some significant coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability per WP:CORP. If you don't fix these issues soon, the article will, I am afraid, be tagged for speedily deletion. – ukexpat (talk) 19:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Junemillom/Ambrose Hotel, Barrow-In-Furness

hi, my first page (hopefully of many as I plan to do a serries of pages on local pubs/hotels that are of note), can I have some feed back please. User:Junemillom/Ambrose Hotel, Barrow-In-Furness — Preceding unsigned comment added by Junemillom (talk • contribs)

I moved the article to Ambrose Hotel as there is no need for the "Barrow-in-Furness" disambiguation. I also tidied up the text, fixed some typos, added some wikilinks, and some categories. You will need to find some more sources to support notability - at the moment the article is not showing the significant coverage in reliable sources required, hence the maintenance tags that I have added. – ukexpat (talk) 02:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also found a suitably licensed image at the Geograph project (an excellent source by the way), so I uploaded it to Commons and added it to the article. It's a little small and a higher resolution one would be much better, but it will do for now. – ukexpat (talk) 02:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prince EX03 Red Racquet

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zach_emory/Prince_O3_Red

Prince EX03 Red

This is an article about a racquet from the EX03 Prince series and lists specs, professional players who have used it, etc. It is not meant to be an advertisement, but rather a source of information for those who are interested in the racquet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zach emory (talk • contribs) 03:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article does read like an advertisement--you've got a large quote in there from the manufacturer, and your references are the manufacturer and a vendor website. I suggest dropping the quote, and getting some references into the article from sources not associated with the manufacture or sale of the racquet. If this racquet is notable, there should be some interviews or magazine articles about it.Nuujinn (talk) 12:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As it is "fairly new" it is unlikely to meet the notability requirements. – ukexpat (talk) 18:57, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DarkSpace

I have done extensive copyediting for the article DarkSpace and added over 30 references. The article still needs a few more sources, some copyediting, and maybe an image or two. (large diff link) Any feedback on what else it needs would be appreciated. Thanks! --Culix (talk) 05:00, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spoke fund

To Whom It May Concern,

I would like feedback on my drafted article. This is about a new investment option model, called a "spoke fund". The article contrasts spoke funds from mutual funds, hedge funds, and separately managed accounts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Islainvest/Spoke_fund

Islainvest (talk) 06:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lily Adamczyk

HI, I am trying to write about the Artist Lily Adamczyk and I could use some feedback please. I would also like help posting some of her pictures into the article. This is my very first article.

Thanks Oils4you (talk) 21:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oils4you (talk • contribs) 08:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brand Tribalism

Hi I have added more relevant citations for your approval. The article is called Brand Tribalism

Thanks you.

Jozette Heerman (talk) 12:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Enzo Mucci

User:Rossomonte/Enzo Mucci

Hello I am created a page on the British Coach Enzo Mucci, I would like any feedback on this before I publish it. The URL is as follows - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Rossomonte/Enzo_Mucci&oldid=341291280 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rossomonte (talk • contribs) 14:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at WP:BIO, it will give you some pointers as to what is expected of a biography article. At the present time their is no indication of why the gentlemen is notable and there are no independent third party references to back up the information. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 15:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Chris E. Stout

User:Global initatives/Dr. Chris E. Stout This article discusses some of the awards and contributions of Dr. Stout. It focuses mostly on his newest project, the Center for Global Initiatives. --Global initatives (talk) 16:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NPOV and WP:BIO, you would also seem from your username to have a close affiliation with the subject, indeed your username could be considered promotional, please see WP:USERNAME. Happy to help with any questions. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 17:12, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

André Fernandes

I wrote and article on André Fernandes, a Portuguese composer (for film and tv) and musician, I'd like to have some feedback.

--Udenied (talk) 17:55, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

kaiserbahnhof halbe

Collapsing draft article text

New article name is Kaiserbahnhof Halbe

Background

The town of Halbe is about 40 km south east of Berlin. Northeast of the town is a level crossing from the main street which leads to the train station for Halbe. Parallel to the railway track about 10 meters apart from each other to the north is the Public Station Building and to the south the extraordinary and historic listed property, the Royal train station building, also known as the Royal reception building. In older sources and on postcards the station is also known as the Emperor Station or is designated the Imperial Hunting Seat for the Hohenzollern family.

History

The history of Halbe station is closely linked with the development of the Prussian railway system. After 1838 the first Prussian railroad track had already been opened from Berlin to Potsdam. In the following decade further fast connections to the capital Berlin were developed. A second rapid development phase of the railway began in the 1860’s. In little more than a decade the number of the tracks emanating from Berlin doubled.

The Cottbus from Görlitz line

The first new building of this second phase was the Berlin connection with Cottbus from Görlitz. A royal decree of 1858 smoothed the way for the line's construction. Bethel Henry Strousbergs, the railway king of this time, formed the Berlin Görlitzer Railway Company. A cabinet order of May 1864 approved the building of the railway by Strousberg's corporation. The initial distance to Cottbus was completed in 1866, and to Görlitz the 1867. The main station in Berlin was designed in 1866-68 by August Orth.

The Halbe train station on this line was used from 1866 until just before the First World War in 1912 when the building was adapted for other uses, primarily by reducing the installation of partitions and with the height of the rooms being reduced with false ceilings. Furthermore a single-storey porch was added to the structure to the south and the goods sheds to the north were extended.

The Architect August Orth

The Royal reception building was designed by the renowned Berlin architect, August Orth. The building, probably a gift of the railway company to the kaiser, served as starting point for his hunts in the extensive forests surrounding Halbe. The kaiser and later emperors used the Royal reception building, which was administered by a house yard master, on only three occasions.

August Orth was one of the most important architects in Berlin in the second half of the 19th Century. Beside numerous churches (e.g. the 1865 Zionskirche in Berlin) he was particularly famous as the architect and planners for the rapidly developing railway network. He is regarded as one the founding fathers of Berlin's metropolitan railway. From the 1860s he was the preferred architect of the railway tycoon Bethel Henry Strousbergs, for which he sketched in 1867/68 a splendid palace and from 1868 the large cattle and slaughterhouse in Berlin's Wedding district. The buildings for the Berlin Görlitzer railway, which also developed from the Strousberg's connection, are an outstanding example of Orth’s work. The most important building was thereby the 1866-68 established large representative reception building in Berlin. SHis most famous was the Gorlitzer railway station, which was destroyed in World War Two. The site has a small cafe in the remaining building and is a large park. The Royal reception building in Halbe is an important example of Royal train stations by this the architect August Orth.

The architecture of the Station Building

That Station reception building the station Halbe is a red building of exposed bricks, whose wall surfaces are highlighted with horizontal strips by yellowish clay bricks. It consists actual reception building adjacent to the single-storey goods shed to the north directly with a ticket hall, restaurant and official residence as well as other facilities. The simple decoration of the building is completed by ornaments such as round windows.

The exterior of the Royal Train Station building

Royal reception building is a rectangular, single-storey building of exposed red bricks with four towers and a entry extending into the large freestanding area to the east of the building. The towers each open in in each case five arched arcades to the free standing area to the east and to the railway tracks to the west. At the track side there were formerly two entrances. From the free standing area the entrance was possible by those on horse and carriage. It was crowned by an eagle carved out of red stone. The wall surfaces consists of red clay bricks horizontally laid and broken by bands of yellow clay bricks. All joints are mortared with red joint mortar. Straight-lineness and regularity of the brick-work are emphasized by a joint line. The upper evel is surrounded by a parapet wall, which incorporates the remaining window and wall openings.

The interior of the Royal Train Station

The inside of the Royal receipt building comprises three complex curved rooms with magnificent painted ceilings. In the design drawings these are called 'Vestibul', 'Waiting rooms of the Kaiser' and 'Salon for the Attendants'. Finally there was a 'Toilet & closet' as well as an area for the servants. With the 1912 changes partition walls and an intermediate ceiling were inserted, the original space remaining hidden above the intermediate cover. Golden painted stucco ribs with narrow bundle staffs are visible comprising oak leaves and shells. A spiral staircase in the northeast tower gives access to the first floor.

The Halbe Station Buildings - an ensemble

With the Station reception building and Royal reception building Halbe ensemble of station buildings is unique in Brandenburg. First both buildings are important examples Prussian railway buildings in the second half of the 19th Century.

Other comparable Royal reception buildings

Royal reception building in Halbe documents the railway company's enthusiasm for assisting the Kaisers. The building is the earliest example of a building reserved for the Kaiser and his guests in Brandenburg. Comparable buildings are the later Kaiser stations in Zehdenick Neuhof (1888) and Joachimsthal (1899) and Potsdam (1906).

[edit] References Bidlungswerk Brandenburg der Deutschen Gesellschaft e.V.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Petermacky (talk • contribs) 01:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Draft at: User:Petermacky/Kaiserbahnhof Halbe

N.G.J. Ballanta

New article: N.G.J. Ballanta about an early 20th century West African composer and music scholar. User:Becky Brock Kiel/N.G.J. Ballanta Becky Brock Kiel (talk) 06:51, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portofino framework

I wrote a new article about the Portofino framework. It is currently under my personal page and available for your review.

Portofino is an open-source web application framework written in Java and based on model-driven engineering. It was already mentioned by others in Model-driven engineering, Commercial open source applications, Domain-driven design and Metamodeling, often as "ManyDesigns Portofino".

Predonzani (talk) 10:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Island

Liberty Island expanded and re-organized articleDjflem (talk) 14:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aage Giodesen

Aage_Giodesen Article is about the Danish artist Aage Giodesen with a number of references, and includes an example of his work from Wikimedia. --whb123 (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Whbonney 2/3/10[reply]

Skirmish Paintball

I am requesting feedback for Skirmish Paintball

Skirmish paintball is one of the leading Paintball Networks across the UK, providing thousands and thousands of customers with paintball games across the UK, and so far there is no mention of it on Wikipedia.

Chriscollins405 (talk) 16:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LindaFowler/Princeton Symphony Orchestra

Dear Wikipedia editors:

Would you kindly review the following draft for Princeton Symphony Orchestra? Many thanks and best,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lindafowler/The_Princeton_Symphony_Orchestra

Lindafowler (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)Linda Fowler 2/3/10[reply]

Enviralment

User:Weemz/Enviralment

Hello, I'm a new member to Wikipedia and this is my first of hopefully many submissions. I figured I would start with something small and easy like the site Enviralment to ensure that I get the submission process down pat before moving on to bigger and lengthier submissions. The work I'm submitting is a Canadian blog called Enviralment, which is similar to Small Dead Animals and others of that ilk. It has been featured on some predominant Canadian sites, most notably The Green Party of Canada.

I would appreciate some feedback and opinions on my first submission.

Thanks you.

--Weemz (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Collard

I've posted this article about User:In2play/Mark Collard who has been instrumental in popularising and developing the field of adventure education in Australia. He has also written 3 top-selling texts in regards activities used in the field. This is only a start, and I am still looking for more sources to add further information about his accomplishments over the past 20 years. I'm looking for feedback, as this is my first Wikipedia article contribution.

I woudl liek to get some feedback about how to create those boxes which appear in top right-hand side which give vital stats, such as DOB, spouse, kids, etc.

cheers, Will 4 Feb 2010 In2play (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Global Samaritans

Check this article on the non-profit Global Samaritans.

User:Sporter85/Global Samaritans

Sporter85 (talk) 02:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article may not meet the notability criteria of WP:CLUB. Please provide some more third party references to substantiate the notability of the organization. Thanks. -Reconsider! 07:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Granary Buildings, Leeds

Any feedback on this article would be welcome.

This is an important, historic building but there doesn't seem to be any mention of it in the Leeds and Liverpool Canal or Architecture of Leeds articles.

EricPolymath (talk) 09:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Playground (2009 film)

I would appreciate a review of an article on the documentary, Playground, (2009 film) User:Ekso8/Playground (2009 film) which focuses on the child sex trade in the United States and was released last year. The film was directed by Libby Spears and its executive producers include George Clooney, Grant Heslov and Steven Soderbergh.

Ekso8 (talk) 18:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Micro-mega rule

I am asking your response to my article 'Micro-mega rule', which was posted on January 25, 2010. It was posted as "this page is a new unreviewed article", but I cannot see it now in Wikipedia. Is it accepted? Can I receive some feedback?

Josep Colomer February 5, 2010

<e-mail redacted> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.54.199.217 (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find any trace of an article called Micro-mega rule. Are you sure that was its title? What user name did you use to create it? Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 01:55, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Summer Leadership Initiative

I have written an article: User:Tschweizer/new article name here I would appreciate any feedback before I go live. This describes a not for profit organization that provides youth leadership programs. Thank you.

Tschweizer (talk) 01:10, 6 February 2010 (UTC) Tom February 5, 2010[reply]

The article says the group was "founded by Tom Schweizer"—is that you? If so, you should read up on Wikipedia's best practices for editors with conflicts of interest and its FAQ for organizations. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 02:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raptor Conservation

Hello!

I submitted an article about Raptor Conservation concerns as a Conservation Biology class project. Would you please give me some feedback so that I may be rid of the notation above the article?

Thanks!

Mikayla Boche 24.119.206.106 (talk) 05:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xena: Warrior Princess

Xena: Warrior Princess. Touchy article, with strong and differing opinions. I have recently restructured it, improved style, added bits. Require general feedback on how to improve it further, for self and others who regularly patrol it. Would like reclassification to C/B class if appropriate. Bards (talk) 16:11, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commotio

User:OxfordSinger/Commotio

Looking for initial feedback, please - first Wiki contribution. Thank you. OxfordSinger (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

North of England Education Conference

My first article - looking for some general feedback and if it needs appropriate tag for improvement.

Many thanks

Davidburnell (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First, I want to note that this is a very fine effort for a first article.

While I have some observations, most fall into the optional areas for improvement, as opposed to requirements.

I was looking for the overall purpose of the conference, and didn't find it clearly stated in the lede or as its own section. Those not familiar with the conference, might reasonably guess it has something to do with education goals, but it isn't obvious whether this means pedagogy, proposed legislation, or what. The best hint is in a section titled "Speakers" but that isn't the place I would look to find a purpose. Consider a separate section to cover the purpose or goals. It probably also belongs in the lede, but be aware that a lede section summarizes the article, so it is not only acceptable to be in both places, it is virtually required.
On a related point, I wondered if there were some notable deliverables - proposed legislation, proposed organizations or reorganizations of the educational system, white papers, or something else.
Please check out referencing. You nicely included some references, but the citation style could be improved.
Please examine the capitalization in the last sentence of your Delegates section (and you can refer to WP:MOSCAPS for help.) In some cases, e.g. Directors of Education, I assume the term is formal and requires capitalization, but I wonder if "Headteachers", "Higher Education", "Health", "Police", and "Voluntary Sector" should be capitalized.
You have a major heading "Since 2004" and discuss each conference since that date. Is there something special about 2004, or is that simply when you starting an annual summary?
The annual conferences are a secondary heading (which is fine) but the 2011 conference has a different level heading and a different title structure. I don't see a good reason for this, and would use the same format as for the other conferences.
In the section on the 2007 conference , you refer to "14 - 19 Learners". I don't know what this means.--SPhilbrick T 22:58, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

War Of Love

I created the article for Christian Singer Sheila Walsh's album User:Hermeyjdi/War Of Love and was looking for feedback on it. Is it ready to post on the main site and if so how do I do that? Hermeyjdi (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid that it is not ready to me moved to the mainspace yet. At the moment there are no references from reliable sources to demonstrate that the album meets the notability guidelines set out at WP:NALBUM, and without those it would be quickly nominated for deletion. – ukexpat (talk) 18:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard O'Brien (author, collectible toys expert)

Hi - If possible, I'd like some feedback on a collectible toys expert in this article: Richard O'Brien (author/collectible toys expert). It's my first article and I want to be sure it's okay. Anyone who likes toys or comics might be interested in reading it. Thanks AlisonMarek (talk) 01:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it to Richard O'Brien (author) which is in line with Wikipedia's naming conventions. I have also reviewed it and made some formatting changes. The main issue is with references - you should try to use in-line citations from the references you are using - please take a look at WP:FOOTNOTE and WP:CITE for assistance or leave me a message on my talk page. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 02:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been tagged for deletion as a copyvio of the author's bio on amazon.com. – ukexpat (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.T. Barnum Awards

P.T. Barnum Awards Hello, looking for feedback on this page on a Tufts University awards show for excellence in the entertainment industry. Please let me know if you see any errors or have more information. Thank you Carchi01 (talk) 22:35, 7 February 2010 (UTC)carchi01 2/5/10[reply]

new Article: List_of_countries_by_greenhouse_gas_emissions_per_unit_area - feedback requested

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:2SickNick/List_of_countries_by_greenhouse_gas_emissions_per_unit_area

Perhaps an issue is that because the page is based on another list of GHG per capita, some of the text is repeated from the original page.

On the other hand, these lists of countries can get out of hand if too many different lists are put in the same article and, in any case, the whole point of this article is that there are other ways to rank countries other than total GHG emissions or GHG per capita - which are the generally quoted yardsticks.

  - Nick  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2SickNick (talk • contribs) 06:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don’t feel it is appropriate as an article, which is unfortunate, as you’ve obviously gone to a fair amount of work to create it.

As you correctly note, there are multiple ways of measuring GHG emissions. I don’t see the value of GHG/area. I read your explanation; it didn’t persuade me, but I’ll emphasize, it isn’t particularly important to try to persuade me. What is important is to find reliable sources discussing GHG as a ratio to area as a meaningful measure. Short of that, the article is Original Research which is strictly prohibited.

As an alternative, if you are convinced that it has value as a measure, you can persuade a reliable source to publish your research. If it catches on, it will then be appropriate for Wikipedia.SPhilbrick T 16:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could it be relevant to the idea of ecological footprint? In any case, you do need to explain exactly why such an article could be useful. Itsmejudith (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't entirely see your point about it being "original research" All I've done is to take existing tables of data that are themselves encyclopaedic and combine them together. maybe I've combined it in a new way, but it doesn't seem so unusual to me. Seems as if I need to learn more about the purpose and style of Wikipedia, anyway. Thanks for the feedback. 2SickNick (talk) 00:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've now read "What Wikipedia is not, and the no-original-thought clause is clearly valid Wikipedia:NOT#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. I'll use the page somewhere else and maybe one day it's results will be posted back here by a third party! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 2SickNick (talk • contribs) 00:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you understand. Sometimes it seems odd to some that original thoughts would actually be discouraged, but it does make some sense. Good luck getting it published elsewhere. --SPhilbrick T 03:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph M. Sabol--Request for review

User:Picman6500/Joseph M. Sabol

This article is about Joseph M Sabol. An American Videographer who produced a documentary video on the 3 Mile Island Steam Generator Transport. This over land hauling project was the largest in US History. To do what he did was next to impossible. Joe did this entire production by himself at the request of KMX International, the company responsible for the over land transport.

From what I understand , he shot this video covering 70 miles in 30 days, film style. If you were able to see the obstacles in this job, you would appreciate this. The companies that were involved have been nominated for awards in their respective industries for the highest achievement possible using the video Joseph shot. Joseph did an amazing job and since he is a product of Parma Ohio, we (the authors ) feel he is notable.

We request a review so that we can correct any problems so it is published on Wikipedia and the other reason is that we feel not only that this article is worthy of publication but if it were not for the Security Issues involved, the media would have picked this up much sooner than it did. As it was, there was a News Media Center established in the same place as they used during the nuclear accident. Joseph was the only one allowed to videotape this entire project from the actual off loading on the Deleware to the arrival at 3 Mile Island. This is unprecedented.

Thank You

Siduanil (talk) 15:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Sidu Anil, Author, 2/08/2010[reply]

The article, which is currently at User:Picman6500/new_article_name_here, has a number of issues, most importantly notability. There is no clear assertion as to why Mr. Sabol or his company meet Wikipedia notability criteria. You could make a case for the notability of the transport of the steam generators, if it was the largest overland transport in US history (citation needed though), but that fact would not confer notability on the person who filmed it. The documentary itself may be notable enough for an article, if it attracts sufficient interest and media attention. It is conceivable that J & J Video Productions meets the criteria through its work, so the article might stand a better chance of sticking if it was about J & J rather than its owner. In any case, you will need to assert notability clearly, preferably in the lead section, before this article is ready to go live, and support it with reliable independent third-party citations. If you believe this is about a unique and unprecedented person or event, you need citations to confirm this.

Once notability is established, the tone of the article needs some work. The present version reads in parts like Mr. Sabol’s resume and in parts like promotional literature for his company. Phrases like “being somewhat of a visionary” are POV. Individuals should be referred to by their surnames (“Sabol” rather than “Joe” or “Joseph”) (see WP:MOS). Where specific assertions are made, such as the “national recognition” of J & J, the uniqueness of the steam generator transport etc., these should be supported with inline citations. Finally, you currently have external links embedded in the text, which is incorrect for Wikipedia. Many of these need to be changed to internal Wikilinks (such as Kutztown State University and Pat Garrett). Some others should be replaced with inline citations that confirm specific assertions, and any remaining relevant external links, such as the link to J & J’s official website, should be placed in an External links section at the bottom of the article.

NB: You describe yourself as the "authors", but the article appears to have been created by User:Picman6500. Please read WP:Multiple accounts and WP:Role account to ensure you are editing according to Wikipedia policy. Ka renjc 11:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raleigh Downtown Live

User:DeepSouth2010/Raleigh Downtown Live Raleigh Downtown Live

(DeepSouth2010 (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

It's not clear to me whether this is supposed to be an article about the event or a list of acts that have appeared at the event. Either way there are notability issues. You will need to find significant coverage in reliable sources to demonstrate notability. The event's own website doesn't count as it is a self-reference, but press coverage would be ideal. – ukexpat (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Centage

This is my first article. I'm researching budgeting companies for a college task and believe this work in process has great information. It is not complete, but I want to be sure I'm doing things correctly.

User:Jacobsassoon/Centage

Jacobsassoon (talk) 22:32, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In its current state, it reads like an advertisement for the company's products. If you're writing about the corporation, I think more information about the corp. would be appropriate.Nuujinn (talk) 03:22, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opium and Romanticism

I just wrote the article and was hoping to get some feedback on it. It is about the presence of opium during the Romantic era in England, and it focuses on three different arguments about its ability to influence literary creation. It ends with some examples of famous Romanticists and their creations. Please let me know what you think!

Aoleson88 (talk) 03:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me like an essay assignment, which is not appropriate for Wikipedia.

I suggest you read the What Wikipedia is not policy page; in particular, the sections on Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought ("Although Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge, it is not a vehicle to make opinions become part of such knowledge") and Wikipedia is not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal ("The purpose of Wikipedia is to present facts, not to teach subject matter"). Perhaps the article title should be redirected to Opium#Cultural references instead? Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 05:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited some of the information. It was not an essay assignment--I think the last line in the Overview made it appear that way. Does this look any better? Aoleson88 (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just starting with the first paragraph I see a number of style and wording issues (but I'm new at this). Using the word "ensnared" is probably not the best choice--it's not really neutral. "what is most commonly recognized" is passive voice and not referenced--I studied comp lit for about 14 years, and personally I don't regard opium as a "creative counterpart" to literature and poetry--and the important thing about that is both mine and and the position you put into the paragraph are points of view, and don't belong in an encyclopedia article. Likewise, if you want to assert that there were three different views of the effects of opium on Romantic Lit, you need to supply a verifiable reference. And it seems from the later text that these three views are from three people; Abrams, Schnieder and Hayter. Are there not more proponants of each position you could cite?

It gets better further on, but you might consider rewording parts of it to make the references clearer in the prose (eg. "Soandso has argued that Coleridge's use of opium interfered with his ability to finish Cristobal and Kubla Kahn"). For example, the Opium, Real Images, and Dreaming as a Channel section reads well, but it's unclear to me if the entirety of that section is Hayter's opinions, or comes from other sources as well. It might help if you think of this as an article on the different views of the effects of opium use on English romantic authors,

I think you have a nice start here, though, good work! Nuujinn (talk) 01:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your feedback! It was very helpful! When I re-read the article I definitely saw what you meant about it sounding somewhat skewed instead of impartial. I'm still editing, so we will see how it goes! Thanks again! Aoleson88 (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help, it's a good topic, I wrote my comp lit senior page on opium and coleridge. Drop me a note on my talk page or here when you're down with another round of edits, and I'll take a look. Nuujinn (talk) 01:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just took a look at the revised version, it looks like it's much better. Could someone else take a look and see what else needs to be done before it can be moved into real space? Nuujinn (talk) 01:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Denielle Hann

User:Nlmusicguy/Denielle Hann

New to Wiki. Please provide feedback/edits on Denielle Hann. It must also be posted to wiki by someone who has that ability.

Thanks very much Nlmusicguy (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Nlmusicguy 09 Feb 2010[reply]

Review LTX-Credence article

LTX-Credence Corporation

Two companies have merged, updating the historical data. Easy review. Ref'ed AP article on the subject, sourced by the newly merged company. Rbenech (talk) 22:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Quinn (writer)

Article Name: Sean Quinn (writer)

I'd welcome some general feedback--I know the article needs more content--and I'm working on that. I also would like help directing people to this article, for instance, if you search for "Sean Quinn" an Irish Businessman comes up with no direct link to Sean Quinn the White House Press Corps writer. Thank you,

IYHBerry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iyhberry (talk • contribs) 02:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't entirely know if this should be an independent article just yet, as there may need to be more significant coverage of this individual from third-party sources. Could be mistaken. In any case, the references need proper formatting, the mentioning of President Obama should likely include a link to his article, and "on the ground" might read better if it were hyphenated. Also, the first biographical ref didn't directly lead to a page which verified its claim. -- James26 (talk) 08:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the article a little (removing unsourced info, adding more citations) but it could still use some (sourced) expansion. The main thing it needs now, though, is another incoming link or two. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Zadick

I've written a biography article for User:Rosalita923/Bill_Zadick, a US amateur wrestler who has won a world championship. It's the first article I've ever created, so I'd be grateful for any and all feedback regarding anything you feel needs to be added, deleted, or cited differently.

Many thanks! --Rosalita923 (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blik

I would appreciate any feedback for the post I wrote about blik - a cool wall graphics company in Venice. thanks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hkoop/blik

Hkoop (talk) 23:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your citations are malformed, see WP:Cite for more info. Also, I'm not sure you have established notibility, the article could use more 2nd and 3rd party references. And this reads pretty much like an advertisement--making the prose more neutral and less enthusiatic would help. Nuujinn (talk) 23:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wishabi

I would appreciate any feedback and/or edits to this article that I've created about Wishabi, a Canadian based online shopping service. I've read all the guidelines and tried to follow them as much as possible before moving it from user space to public space. It's looking for editing, proofreading and any other changes that would make it a good Wikipedia article. Any feedback is welcomed, and I'll do my very best to fix or improve this article. Thanks! Mkpauling (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To your credit, it's well written and I think you have included enough external sources to be able to argue for notability. But the article reads as if you're somehow associated with the company and have written an advertisement. Nuujinn (talk) 00:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Wood

(Pmdance (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I'm assuming that you're asking for feedback on User:Pmdance/Brett Wood (the article you created) and not Brett Wood (as you linked to above). The article looks promising, but it needs references for statements like "Brett has recorded on many Australian albums". Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 19:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Article: American Car Designer Eric Stoddard

Request to review information about Automobile Designer Eric Stoddard. Review resources on related car designs, please.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Stoddard

Speedstudio (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC) SpeedStudioDesign.com[reply]

You have a decent amount of resources. I don't really see anything wrong. Maybe remove some of the duplicate content under "Career."

Aimelise (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tito in ekšn

Tito in ekšn punk rock group from the 90s

Partizanchek (talk) 17:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hardys Animal Farm (User:Thestuarthardy/Hardys_Animal_Farm)

User:Thestuarthardy/Hardys Animal Farm is a page I'm looking to submit for promotion to the main wikipedia site, describing a large tourist attraction and the features found on it. I have read all the tutorial articles, and this is my first attempt that I've put together for public consumption. However, I was looking to get some feedback from those of you who are more experienced at this and some pointers to ensure the content of the page is appropriate.

Please have a look through and give me your feedback (however critical!) and I'll do my best to apply your suggestions to the article.

Thanks in advance, Stuart Hardy

Thestuarthardy (talk) 18:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New article /* Cumbre Judicial Iberoamericana */

Hello to everybody

I'd like to request for feedback about my new article "Cumbre Judicial Iberoamericana" (Latinamerican Judicial Summit). The summit is a non profit organization which involves al the Latinamerican judiciaries, plus Andorra, Spain and Portugal.

At the moment I work for the General Council for the Spanish Judiciary, and this is the institution which runs the permanent secretariat of the related summit.

The General Council has already taken an agreement in order to authorize this article at wikipedia.

Thanks to all for your feedback

Jorge

Jcarrera747 (talk) 18:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you're referring to Cumbre Judicial Iberoamericana, it's got one huge problem: it's not in English. Maybe you should post it at http://es.wikipedia.org instead? The English language Wikipedia is for articles in English. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 19:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harley Sherman Manuel

Looking for feedback on this document. Waiting on resource from JSTOR to corroborate story. Don't have access to dbase.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Arlsphinx/new_article_name_here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arlsphinx (talk • contribs) 18:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arlsphinx (talk) 18:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe this person will meet the Notability standards. Being a Doctor isn't inherently notable. I see a peer-reviewed paper, so the specific relevant standard is WP:ACADEMIC. It doesn't appear to me that he qualifies.--SPhilbrick T 18:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

French Bull, LLC

French Bull, LLC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:161e61 fb161 2/11/10161e61 (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment the draft is way too promotional in tone (please read WP:Spam) to be moved to the mainspace. It also will need references to significant coverage in reliable sources to support notability per WP:CORP. – ukexpat (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Samara

Done Closeable, I guess. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 04:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Samara article on my user page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sud_Ram/Tony_Samara

This article has been deleted in the past but new information has come to light since then and more sources are available so I have rewritten and re-sourced the article to fit - IMHO - Wikipedia's standards.

Please let me know if you agree that this is acceptable or not.

Peace Sud Ram (talk) 19:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article (at User:Sud Ram/Tony Samara) doesn't appear to have any references from third-party verifiable reliable sources—which is required for an article, and particularly, for a biography. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 19:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, however I understood that mainstream European media and a published biography of the subject would qualify as third party reliable sources or have I misunderstood? I have read the guidelines but don't seem to find a contradiction. Sud Ram (talk) 07:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are currently nine references for the article. Of those:

Four are to tonysamara.org, the web site of the article's subject
One is to samaramultimedia.net, another site affiliated with the article's subject
One is to a web page that sells a book by the article's subject
One is to YouTube, which isn't considered a reliable source
One is to a self-published book that came out last week
One is to sabado.pt:
- Searching for "Samara" finds no results on that page
- Searching for "Samara" finds no results on that site
- Google is not able to find any pages on that site that contain both "Tony" and "Samara"

Given the above, we're left with nothing.

When I look for sources myself:

Google News Archive knows of three people named "Tony Samara", none of whom appear to be your shaman
Google Books doesn't have much, either. This book mentions him as head of a new religious movement, but it's just one in a list of many new religious movements.

Basically, you've got no solid sourcing on this article because there aren't any good sources to be found. Some day you might, but that day is not now. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 08:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dori for helping out. Sabado's website and print contents are separate, as you will find with a lot of media in Europe so maybe I should link to a PDF of the printed article? The YouTube link of the Croatian TV Show isn't the source itself, it's a reproduction of the program that was featured on HRT 2, the Croatian national television station (which is wikilinked now and linked in the reference).

As to the biography, it's recent and on-demand publishing, not self-published by the subject.

Regarding the Google News Archive, on the page of results of your search, the link in Slovenian is about this same Tony Samara. Which in its turn links to the the national Slovenian TV station's website RTV Slovenija regarding a retreat that was done in Pasman, Croatia.

I'm trying to address your points and hope this answers them. Sud Ram (talk) 11:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To address your points:

No, a PDF of the Sabado article wouldn't help; partly because WP would have to take your word for it being an accurate copy (see WP:V)), but mostly because a single article in Portuguese doesn't meet the significant coverage needed to meet WP:GNG.
On-demand printers will happily print self-published books, and in this case, that's what the biography is. Don't confuse printing with publishing.
YouTube isn't a reliable source, no matter where the video came from.
Having been on Slovenian TV once still doesn't bring him close enough to qualify under WP:GNG. As I said before, he just doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or any of the other notability criteria. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 20:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for your time. Sud Ram (talk) 07:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uyama Hiroto

A beginner here, writing an article about an established Japanese musician and producer who ironically does not have much information posted about him on the web. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elliotmc (talk • contribs) 22:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uyama Hiroto

A beginner here, writing an article about an established Japanese musician and producer who ironically does not have much information posted about him on the web. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Elliotmc/Uyama_Hiroto —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elliotmc (talk • contribs) 22:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With just three sentences and no verifiable sources, I think it will take some more work. References do not have to be web based--magazine and newspaper articles are fine if correctly referenced. Nuujinn (talk) 00:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SeeClickFix

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ellioteaton/SeeClickFix [[user:Ellioteaton/SeeClickFix]

Hi, I'm new to Wiki and I think I've followed all the guidelines pretty well, I just wanted to make sure the formatting on this is correct. Any suggestions are appreciated!

Ellioteaton (talk) 22:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are serious issues with Notability Very few links to reliable sources. One of your best links, to the NYTimes, was messed up. I partially fixed it, but you ought to look at WP:CITE to cite it properly. Find a way to use the NYT reference in the article, as opposed to simply in the list of external links. (External links do not count when assessing notability).

As it stands, if it were proposed for deletion, I'd be hard pressed to disagree, but if you can add more reliable sources, it will help.--SPhilbrick T 17:41, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of the IPCC

This is a new article which i just moved to mainspace, i would like both help and feedback on tidying it up. Thanks mark nutley (talk) 10:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It needs a lot of work - reference citation style and general cleanup. I'll try to make some of the fixes myself.--SPhilbrick T 15:11, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After further review, I agree that this article is redundant given Criticism of the IPCC AR4. While an argument can be made for a broad article covering all criticism of the IPCC, rather than just AR4, virtually everything in this article relates to AR$. Consequently I will support the AfD (subject to merging an unique, relevant material). You obviously have interest in the subject, but that interest would be better served improving the existing article. --SPhilbrick T 15:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[6]

Hi I'm preparing a new article about the Scottish writer, Mark Fleming. I believe he is notable because his work is concerned with promoting a positive image of mental health issues.

Would appreciate feedback about the layout / content of this article.

(When previewed, why do hyperlinks appear as numbers rather than text - is this something to do with hyperlinks needing to be verified?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ColinKNewman (talk • contribs) 13:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than [http://www.laurahird.com/], try <ref>[http://www.laurahird.com/ this is the laura bird website]</ref>. See WP:CITEHOW. You could temporarily add a {{reflist}} during the preview, if you wanted to see how it would look. Usually only one {{reflist}} is in an article, at the bottom. jmcw (talk) 13:33, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fry-Wagner Moving & Storage

Fry-Wagner Moving & Storage is at article about a notable company in the moving industry. The article is linked and referenced. I would appreciate your feedback. Thanks!

Kristy860 (talk) 14:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To establish notability, you need to use verifiable references, and in this case all of your references appear to be from Fry-Wagner and UVL. Also, the article appears to be an advertisement more than anything else, see WP:NPOV for what you should strive for.

The timeline is done as a list and I think that would be better rendered in prose, and fleshed out with more details. Nuujinn (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

obselidia

Hi,

this is the first time I've ever written for wikipedia, not sure if I've got it right. In particular, I couldn't figure out how to post the reference to an article I quote.

Thank you for your patience and your help.

Best Deebstar (talk) 05:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)deebstar[reply]

Unfortunately, your article contains very little. Among other issues, it has no reliable sources. You asked specifically about posting a reference - check out WP:CITE and footnotes --SPhilbrick T 18:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Health Advocate Inc.

I would like to have my article Health Advocate Inc. reviewed.

Thanks for your help, Arianne13 (talk) 09:38, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a good start! I've done a llttle cleaning up and editing to make it more wiki-like. I also moved it to Health Advocate, as we don't use the Inc. part of the company's name in the article title. The article could still really use some incoming links. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 10:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teaching Writing in the United States

I posted this article on Feb 6 and have not yet received feedback. How should I go about getting feedback on this article?

Diana Leddy (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. I made some minor stylistic changes.

My main observations:

Two of the sections start in a style that seems more suited to essay writing than encyclopedia writing. One starts "Sensing a serious gap...". The other starts "Emerging from both the Writing Process...". I don't know whether the format is officially discouraged, but I didn't like it.
The lede is too cryptic. Check out WP:LEAD, in particular "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article."--SPhilbrick T 16:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kasapuram

A small village located in the Guntakal Mandal area of Anantapur district in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh in India. Kasapuram is famous for it's Lord Nettikanti Anjaneya temple which carries it's history way back from 16th Century, a period of Vijayanagara Samrajya of Sri Krishna Devaraya.

The Village attracts interest because of the Hanuman Temple whose annual income can be said to have crossed Rs. 2 Crores due to evergrowing amount of pilgrimage. About half of the Village's population depends on the Temple for livelihood directly or indirectly.

Kasapuram can be divided into two parts by the main road, where one part is the proper village and the other being the Temple area. The Temple area is said to have had a name called "Nettikallu" which is the base for the Lord's name "Nettikanti" currently. The temple area looks quite developed because of a huge pilgrimage and income of the Temple. The Village borders the Anantapur district area adjoining Maddikera village of Kurnool district.

References http://www.apendowments.gov.in/Kasapuram/Pages/Home.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinay.kvc (talk • contribs) 15:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a place to write an article, but to ask for feedback about an article you have written elsewhere. Check out Wikipedia:Article wizard 2.0 for an easy way to start your article.--SPhilbrick T 16:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rockbridge Rapids Baseball

User:Stogieman/Rockbridge Rapids Baseball

How do I move the draft to the main page? Stogieman (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's not yet ready for the main page. You need to establish Notability through the use of reliable sources as references. While it looks like you have one reference, it isn't properly formed. Check out footnotes for help, and one will not be enough.--SPhilbrick T 03:18, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zibbet

I'm new to Wiki and would love some feedback

ACraftyArab (talk) 06:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Kay Tarapolsi, Feb 13, 2010ACraftyArab (talk) 06:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but it reads like WP:PROMOTION. Wikipedia article must meet Notability standards, this one has not met that standard.SPhilbrick T 16:01, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reconnective Therapy

Reconnective Therapy Reconnective Therapy ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psullivan7 (talk • contribs) 13:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eckhard Stratmann-Mertens

The name of my article is Eckhard Stratmann-Mertens, a founding member of the German Green Party and one of the first Green Party members to be elected to the German parliament. (A group of 28 were sent all at once.) Additionally, Mr. Stratmann-Mertens was the first Green to speak in the Bundestag (parliament).

This article is essentially a translation from the German Wikipedia article. Finding new information in a newspaper article, which was not in the original German article, some of my article is different from the original.

Anyone familiar with translation knows that one must always choose between translating word-for-word and making it read like a well-written text. Translating word-for-word results in very awkward writing, full of strange grammar and syntax. To make things sound better in English (my native language), I re-wrote some of the original, staying true to the information contained in it.

I have revised this article a number of times, improving the writing and look of the page and I think it's ready to go live. Then the lists and articles where Mr. Stratmann-Merten's name already exists on English and German Wikipedia pages can be linked to this article.

Thanks!

Marrante (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2010 (UTC) Valentine's Day[reply]

It's good and nearly ready to go live. You did the right thing in not sticking too closely to the German, because en.wikipedia doesn't have to be exactly the same as de.wikipedia. A few minor points.

Start with the subject's name in bold, and with his alternative name (formerly known as...) . After that, only use his surname. I thought the corduroys and open-necked shirt were relevant, but what he said wasn't. Perhaps there is a nuance in the German that is impossible to translate (was this much more informal than the usual first speech, for example?) You could just leave it out. In the lede you can just say he is a school teacher and give the details later. The name of the school doesn't need to be in twice. No need for links to articles in German wiki. Thanks very much for your contribution. Itsmejudith (talk) 14:10, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for responding. I have made all the recommended changes, re-working some of it to make the copy (as in copywriting, not duplicate) flow better. The significance of the quote is that in his introduction, Stratmann-Mertens addressed the citizens of Germany before the members of parliament. I have added that information to the article, but left out the actual quote. I think the description in prose is sufficient.

I hope this can now go live.

Quick question — not sure how to search for the answer, so I hope it's okay to ask here. I notice that some pages seem to go live with a "redirect" from the User page. Why is that sometimes done and can that be avoided with this contribution of mine?

Marrante (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The move will automatically generate a redirect. When I write a new article, I do it in user space, then move it into main space, then delete the redirect.--SPhilbrick T 17:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Marrante (talk) 17:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific Anomalies

There is a growing public mistrust of scientific announcements with Global Warming the latest to be under attack. The essay suggests a number of anomalies that should be more widely publicised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Nettleton (talk • contribs) 16:10, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you are talking about this, sorry, but it reads like an essay. See WP:NOT. While you do have some references, these are brought together as a WP:SYNTHESIS, which is not appropriate for Wikipedia. SPhilbrick T 15:57, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bar Method

This article was previously deleted. I never saw the original, but wanted to publish my version of The Bar Method. Thank you. 34pin6 (talk) 17:36, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick search in Google [7]. This article seems like advertising: see WP:ADVERT. Try to find some strong third-party source: YouTube is not WP:RELIABLE. jmcw (talk) 14:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A YouTube video can fall under a reliable source, under two conditions:

1. If it is a convenience link

2. If the video contains information that is deemed a secondary source (see YouTube in the section on reliable sources here)

It appears in this case, the author is utilizing the YouTube videos - which house the original news stories - in good faith. As for advertising, it does not appear, at least to me, that this stub is anymore advertising-sounding than the entry on, say, Pilates. I think it's a good start. However, I would double check the facts here of the article before publish; the first sentence, for example, doesn't have adequate support. Artemis84 (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I found some better sources: KUSA-TV, KUSI-TV, Huffington Post, San Diego Magazine and a couple others, all covering the Bar Method in depth. Please have a look: Bar Method Draft. 34pin6 (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crazy Waiting

user:chasingflowers/crazywaiting A recent South Korean movie that I love. Several of the actors have their own Wikipedia pages already, so I thought it would be notable. Chasingflowers (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Physique 57

Physique 57 Physique57

Please assist me with ensuring this article meets all guidelines for Wikipedia. Thank you.

FitHealthy1 (talk) 05:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned about whether it meets the Notability threshold. You do have references, some of which probably qualify as reliable sources, and some of which may not, but the reliable sources mentioning Physique 57 barely mention it. I'm not familiar enough with the sources you cite to know which qualify and which do not - you might be fine, but this is just a heads up that there could be a problem.

You have included references, which is good, as many new editors fail on that score, but please look at footnotes and WP:CITE to see how they should be formatted.

In "Future locations", you say "The first California location will open in May, 2010 at 320 N. Canon Drive in Beverly Hills." Wikipedia has a policy called WP:CRYSTAL, to avoid the problem, you could say "planned to open" or similar wording, and it should have a reference.--SPhilbrick T 17:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requested, please.

Hello,

May I please get some feedback on the following page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Weatherlands/European_Climate_Assessment_and_Dataset_%28ECA%26D%29

I would like to make it live as soon as possible since our website, eca.knmi.nl, has been updated as well.

Note: All images are intended to be copyrighted as open to the public. They are generated by "using" the website which anyone can do.

Thanks for your time, please respond in "my talk."

Good day, ~WL

Weatherlands (talk) 10:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This post says "our website"; what is your connection with this organization? --Orange Mike | Talk 17:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Europe (newspaper)

This is my first article. Any feedback would be appreciated!

New Europe User:Sintechhs/NewEurope

Sintechhs (talk) 12:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A google search[8] show many references to this newspaper. I suggest that you add more information from the other sources so that the article sounds less like a press release.

I would also suggest removing the section 'Media Partnerships' because it contains mainly information that will go out-of-date.

And lastly, consider adding

{{Europe topic|List of newspapers in|title=Lists of newspapers in Europe}}

[[Category:Lists of newspapers| ]] to the end of the article. jmcw (talk) 15:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please Review- East Meets West Productions

I would really appreciate someone reviewing my article on East Meets West Productions. It was named the Small Business Administration's Minority Small Business of the year. I think the article has good citations and is properly formatted.

Thank you,

NMR2010 (talk) 17:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it was named the SBA's Corpus Christi district office MSB of the year; not the same thing! --Orange Mike | Talk 18:06, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophic Burden of Proof

Originally there was one Burden of Proof article that attempted to deal with both Legal Burden of Proof and Philosophic Burden of Proof. This proved too unwieldy, and we therefore decided to split the article into two. Philocentric (talk) 18:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like you took some very positive and constructive steps, great work! One thing I recommend you try before another big change is to notify the Wikiprojects listed on the top of the article's talkpage. In this case, Wikipedia:WikiProject Law. In fact as this is a specialized area and there are some great editors over there please post this thread to that project's talkpage and ask if some folks could take a look. -- Banjeboi 19:29, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas M. Johnston

LauraICRD (talk) 20:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the article and removed the new article tag. I added some wikilinks and made some other formatting changes. The article does read like a resumé or curriculum vitae so I have added an appropriate tag and it would appear from your user name that you have a conflict of interest. – ukexpat (talk) 20:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

French Bull, LLC Revision

French Bull, LLC[[9]]

I've revised this article any feedback would be outstanding

thank you 2.16.10 161e61 (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HS Beavers

How can I get the infobox to the top of the page?

I used Template:Infobox UK Ultimate —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzybear47 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like there is a problem with the template, but it also looks like you created the template. My template skills are limited, but I'll try to see if I can figure it out.--SPhilbrick T 01:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the template, but I do not see the problem. You might check at the help desk, where there are more volunteers,a nd often some with technical expertise. You might also post here, where editors with interest and expertise with infoboxes can help. BTW, I'm a it surprised they call themselves and Ultimate Frisbee team, most teams I know have dropped the "Frisbee" as the game is often played with other brands of discs.--SPhilbrick T 01:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have two issues, IMHO. One is the article itself which I'm not sure if you're creating for fun or practice but I posted a welcome template to your talkpage which has some helpful links. The second is the template which as Sphilbrick notes is a bit complicated. I suggest you ask for template help at Help talk:Template, they are very skilled at templates and likely can sort things out. -- Banjeboi 19:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Praise

Dear Wikipedia, If I had Wikipedia when I was in school and growing up I today would be a genius. With all the HTML and ways of finding and defining material and information I would have the ego of Texas. I love Wikipedia. It is the absolute best dictionary thesaurus and Encyclopedia on this planet.

You are a Godsend to me. Sincerely <e-mail redacted> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.158.128.52 (talk) 02:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. – ukexpat (talk) 02:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Atomic Coffee Machine

This article concerns the 1946 'Atomic' coffee machine. It is factual and referenced. In the future I hope to add more information but I have already provided good references for the article. The images are my own work. I would be happy to have it reviewed.

Generally, this is reasonably written. However, references do not establish notability. For instance, blogs (e.g., CoffeeSnobs.org) are not reliable references, and a Google Patent search that shows only the patent abstract and date is dangerously close to original research. Also often surprising to new editors, other Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable sources. Notability requires coverage in reliable sources other than the ones just mentioned, and beyond a commercial web site dedicated to the subject of the article. See Wikipedia:RS and Wikipedia:N for more on reliable sources and notability, respectively. In this case, you might try searching for coverage in art history or art deco publications, like Art Nouveau and the like. One other minor point: Wikipedia's Manual of Style discourages the use of "The" as the first word in an article title. Better to change yours to "Atomic Coffee Machine".Writeswift 17:07, 17 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Writeswift (talk • contribs)

SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics

Resolved

– Article deleted and user blocked for promotional editing. They can request unblock, have the article userfied or simply start a non-work related account. -- Banjeboi 19:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SEARCH, The National Consortium for Justice Information and Statistics

I am new to Wikipedia and would like feedback on which parts sound too much like an advertisement. Thanks!

Chrisatsearch (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Crane

Done – ukexpat (talk) 19:40, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Impeachable/Nick_Crane

A simple redirect to an existing page Nicholas Crane

--Impeachable (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You don't really need feedback for that. I will move it and edit it per redirect formatting. – ukexpat (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

True - but as I'm not yet confirmed I couldn't take it any further on my own anyway. Thanks Impeachable (talk) 17:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ravens & Chimes

Hi Wikipedia community. I would like some help/feedback about my new article Ravens & Chimes that I've posted in my userspace. Any constructive input would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Baileykwilliams (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Fixed the link to your article, and responded on the talk page. —Akrabbim^talk 19:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Matheny

New unreviewed article/Joseph Matheny

(````) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Setianson (talk • contribs) 18:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edwin Hodge

New unreviewed article/Edwin Hodge

tjbw (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Derrynoel/Roland Carl Backhouse

This is my first article and I am attempting to marshal the information into a standard format. I am almost finished but need to get my text into the proper layout. Many thanks. Derrynoel Derrynoel (talk) 21:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Progressive Death Metal

I've been working on a Progressive Death Metal article in my users page, I'd just like someone to have a look before I publish it.

The problem in the past has been that there aren't enough prog death sources but I think I've found enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chairmaneoin (talk • contribs) 22:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article off your main user page to a subpage and started a new talkpage ("Discussion" page) just for the article with handy search tools. I also posted a welcome template on your talkpage which has some helpful links. Your goal will be to find a at least a few more sources that don't just mention the subject but actually talk about it. You don't have to source every statement but adding more sources to the first several paragraphs will help. Keep up the good work! -- Banjeboi 23:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of Hartford City, Indiana

I have added some sections to History of Hartford City, Indiana since it received its initial rating. What does it need to get beyond a "B"? Does it have too much, too little? What is the preferred style of footnotes and references? TwoScars (talk) 01:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nathan_Winters/Draft_of_MSRRA

I started working on creating an article User:Nathan_Winters/Draft_of_MSRRA and was looking for some feedback. TIA for your time and assistance. Nathan Winters (talk) 02:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For one thing, it doesn't explain what the bill actually put into law. —Akrabbim^talk 03:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts of bills that never passed are not going to pass our tests of notability. This reeks of publicity for the author of the failed bill. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the article currently stands it is lacking in information and needs to be expanded. You should include what exactly the law does and how it effects spouses. More on the background of the bill would be helpful also, such as, why was the original bill introduced. Additional reliable secondary sources should be included to show notability. The Facebook source should be completely removed. Also just a small point, the Act did pass and President Obama signed it into law on 11 Nov 2009. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 19:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userpages

I notice that a lot of people on here have fancy "user pages" with colorful alignments and great pictures. Wikipedia could save a lot of server space if we just simplify. Western Pines (talk) 07:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The place to propose changes is Wikipedia:Village pump/Proposals rather than here, which is where people can request feedback on articles they have created. Excessively complex user pages are not encouraged, particularly when the content is unrelated to Wikipedia activities, but opinions on appropriate user page content vary considerably. There is guidance on what you can and cannot have on your userpage here. See also WP:PERFORMANCE. Ka renjc 12:02, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tania de Jong

Hi could i please get some feedback on this article?? it's been up for more than 24 hrs but i havent gotten any feedback. anything would be appreciated! thanks in advance :)

Tania de Jong Enyfink135 (talk) 11:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be your first article – congratulations on a pretty good start, with most boxes ticked. I’ll remove the unreviewed tag. Suggestions: I’d split the current lead section after “in 40 countries” and place the rest of it in a new “biography” section, and expand her personal details a little if relevant info is available (the Morris Kaplan and Lorna Edwards interviews currently cited in “Further links”would seem to be a good source.). The Reviews section lacks checkable citations and is promotional rather than encyclopaedic; it would be better removed altogether. YouTube links are not blanket-banned in Wikipedia but they often involve illegal use of copyrighted material, and videos of shows and newscasts are specifically mentioned as of concern (see guidance here). Unless you can show that your YouTube links don’t breach policy, they are better removed too. The format of some of your Further links needs tweaking, and you need to add categories - I will help out directly with this shortly. Ka renjc 12:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Eisenberg (American musician and author)

I would like to get some feedback on this article. I think it's okay, but would just like to run it by the crew here.

This is about a man who was a noted piano author and teacher during the 1920's - 1940's. He was active till his death in 1964. He wrote about 100 articles and a number of books related to teaching piano. He also interviewed a number of world-famous musicians in his day. Because of the era in which he was active, much of his work is hard to come by now, though there are some articles or excerpts on the web and some of his books are available for sale at Amazon, Barnes & Noble and antiquarian sellers online. Of course, I can't use links for Amazon & crew, so I amassed what I could and added the list of his works that I found in his last book, which I own. He also made a very important contribution to another notable person, namely his wife, in that he taught her piano, an act that led to her becoming internationally famous toward the end of her life.

I look forward to any feedback on this article, either here or on my talk page. Thanks in advance! Marrante (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks pretty good. Nuujinn (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Marrante (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Making an article 'Live'

I've created an article, but how do I make it 'Live' now? I know it sounds simple, but I can't seem to figure it out... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newsdoggie (talk • contribs) 17:00, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean Ross Palombo, it is live.

However, it needs work. It needs proper references - see WP:CITE and footnotes for more info.

Adding references properly looks hard, but it isn't. Come back if you need more help.--SPhilbrick T 17:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Dipp

Can the team review the new article Michelle Dipp?

Holly2305 (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new here, but this looks like a résumé to me. Have a look at WP:SPIP and Wikipedia:RESUME to find out more about Wikipedia's policy on this sort of article. Marrante (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. CEO's of companies are not always notable, and VPs almost never are (on the basis of position). Meeting Notability standards with reliable sources is important. I confess I looked quickly, but I didn't see any evidence of a source sufficient to establish notability.--SPhilbrick T 17:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine but pls dont go tag the article just yet..lets bring this concerns up on the talk page first ...see if your concerns can be satisfied...We cant keep deleting every new article form new editors..we will keep losing them ...! no speed delete needed i think ..if you like a vote perhaps ..Buzzzsherman (talk) 17:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would help if new editors would create new articles in user space, then we wouldn't have to worry about the possibility of over-zealous deletion. In fact, if Holly would consent, this could be moved to user space, and cleaned up at a leisurely pace. Otherwise, it should meet out requirement and it decidedly doesn't. I did a quick search myself to see if I could find something notable about her, but failed. Doesn't mean it isn't there, but it is more work than just a simple search and add references.--SPhilbrick T 18:48, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well i like you Sphilbrick...great idea lets PM her and make this suggestion...if only everyone was like you and thinking of the new editors feelings ..no way a new editor will ever know all the 5000 guidelines... !hug Sphilbrick...Buzzzsherman (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

vegetable monsters

vegetable monsters Please give me all the feedback possible - and any comments you may have on content and/or style. Rdeastis (talk) 19:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page needs a lot of work, and may not meet the criteria for inclusion at all. The article applies the term to all plants of the genus Monstera, whereas there is no reference to indicate that this term is in general use for this genus of plants. The term is attributed to Erasmus Darwin who does, indeed, use the term in his Botanic Garden..., but no to refer to Monstera species specifically, but to any plant which meets his definition (i.e. plants with double flowers). The etymology of the term "monster" is also wrong: monstrum is no "that which teaches" but rather "that which warns" (monere = to warn). (See the etymology of monster at M-W.com.) If the article is allowed to remain, the references must be rewritten to be inline references, so the facts and the references which verify them can be linked. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Systemic bias

Question unrelated to the purpose of this page

bg

I am a regular and prolific wikipedia editor. I have on-going problems with POV, incivility and "cabalism" by members of a particular wikiproject.

The problem is this: there is a certain class of topics which are interdisciplinary (I will call the fields field A and field B), but the members of the project for field A demonstrate no respect for the contributions of editors in field B. The members of field A greatly outnumber the members of field B, and their attitude seems to be that these topics are solely within thier own province, and that field B is really just, sort of a pretender (as if they think B is like a hobby to them or something, when it actually is a more rigorous and comprehensive study than A is.)

Great volumes of legitimate, academically supported, and unique contributions have been deleted. Some of it wholesale, and some of it is the long term, peacemeal activity. Some of it is by a few dedicated editors, and some of it is by one-timers, and newbies. The problem seems to be a pervasive attitude within the field A.

I have several questions, but my primary one is this: beyond the mediation services provided in WP, is there some judicial check? If I disagree with a mediated resolution, is there some duly appointed judicial body which is authoritative? My problem is that the "wikipedia consensus" obviously fails in situations like these. Is a mediation committee able to see beyond the rancor of a large group that wrongly sees contributions from field B as "POV pushing" when the reality is that academics from field B actually produce legitimate subject matter. It seems that the problem is respecting legitimate interdisciplinary contributions.Anon12e456 (talk) 19:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Systemic bias is a known and recognized problem at Wikipedia. As an organization that generally governs itself by consensus, members of larger groups are going to skew the view of the encyclopedia toward their side. Ideally, the dispute resolution process should address this bias by involving editors who are not involved in either side of the dispute. Unfortunately, it often happens that editors who are not familiar with either side are not well enough informed to make useful decisions, and so they stay away from such discussions. I'm afraid there really isn't a "final arbiter"; the community itself is its own final arbiter. I can only suggest that you exercise patience and try to build bridges between "field A" and "field B" to produce better articles in the common areas. I also suggest that you review the sockpuppetry rules. You claim to be a "regular and prolific" editor, and yet this user name was created solely for the purpose of creating this entry. Creating a new account to avoid the scrutiny of those with whom you have a dispute does not appear to fall under the legitimate uses of an alternative account. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(ec)Sorry, but you are in the wrong place. This is a place to elicit feedback about specific articles. You have a concern, but a very different concern. I urge you to check out Wikipedia:Dispute resolution, and try some of the steps there, and look into mediation or arbitration, as well as discussion at project pages if they exist.--SPhilbrick T 21:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Academy Award Winning Families

User:Klantry01/List of Academy Award Winning Families

List of Academy Award winners related to other winners, subdivided into Extended Families, Siblings, and Couples. Started it after moviemom posted trivia that there was only one 3-generation winning family (The Huston's), when in fact there are two others (The Coppola's and the Farrow/Previn/Allen's), and I couldn't find a reference.

Main concern: I can't say for sure I've done the full geneology on every oscar winner. There may be an ex-spouse, in-law, or cousin I've missed. How should I reflect that?

Klantry01 (talk) 21:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. Open to input on an alternate title. Current one, strictly interpreted, could be "the families of anyone who has won an award." List of Multiple Academy Award Winning Families is similarly ambiguous. List of Academy Award Winners Related to Other Winners is clunky. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klantry01 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Environmental Law in India: Judicial Activism, Public Interest Litigation and Green Benches

Can someone please help me with formatting and with general comments on this article about environmental law in india Thank you --Ahhjean33 (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to the article User:Ahhjean33/new article name here ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 23:30, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quite good. Some formatting issues:

Wikipedia generally puts reference citations after punctuation, in particular just after the period that closes a sentence.
Wikipedia generally uses "logical quotation" meaning that punctuation is palced inside quote markss only if it was part of the original quotation.
Wikipeida normally uses "straight quotes", not "curly" or "angled" quotes in which the opening quote is different from the closing quote.
The use of named references (see Help:Footnotes and citing sources allows multiple references to the same paper or source to go to a single footnote, which improves consistence. I have made this change in one case, as an example.
When a source is cited as a specific reference to a specific statment, it is redundant to include it also as a "general reference" -- that is, to list it in the references section without being attached to a specific citation. Some such sources might be listed in a "Further reading" section.
You might want to consider the list defined reference format, which separates the detailed reference metadata from the body text. It does have the disadvantage of requiring two edits to add a reference if section editing is being used.
There needed to be more wiki-links to other wikipedia articles, I have added several.
I personally recommend the use of citation templates, but this is not required. I have converted the first two references as an example. The reference toolbar gadget (found in the gadgets tab of the preferences dialog) makes adding such references easier, but sometiems manual editing is still needed, as not all options are supported by this gadget.

I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 07:12, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dora Levy Mossanen

User:Pieraklein/Dora Levy Mossanen

I would like help adding content to this page. There is already a reference to one of the author's books on wikipedia under Harem and then the Fiction Section. I would like to link these pages.

Also this author is a regular contributor to the Huffington Post, has been featured in various media: radio (NPR - National Public Radio: The Politics of Culture), tv, blogs, papers, etc. and has her book translated into more than 10 different languages.

I am still learning how to add content... Any additions are welcome, and notes, or comments.

Best, Pieraklein (talk) 00:12, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. I can't see any immediate issues, but it would suggest some minor adjustments such as adding categories and expanding the scope of the topic. -Reconsider! 08:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dietary Supplements

User:Healthycare/L-arginine_ethyl_ester
User:Healthycare/Calcium beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate
User:Healthycare/Guanidinopropionic Acid

I would like to know your opinion on these 3 articles and if they are ready to be moved to the main space. Thank you. J.D. (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding User:Healthycare/L-arginine_ethyl_ester

Looks pretty good.

I didn't like this sentence, L-arginine ethyl ester represents a white powder quickly soluble in hot water in particular, represents. I'm not coming up with a good alternative, but there must be a better way to say this.
The chemical diagram doesn't show up very well. It would look better as an SVG (see Lysine as an example).
If you don't know how to create an SVG, you can put in a request at this place, and someone may convert it for you.
Please add some categories. See WP:CAT if you don't know what this means. See Leucine for examples.--SPhilbrick T 18:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding User:Healthycare/Calcium beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate:

As above, I don't like the word represents. I also don't like criticising without an alternative, but I haven't come up with a good alternative.
In Physical & Chemical Properties, this sentence Also small amount of heavy metals is allowed (lead NMT 1 ppm and arsenic NMT 1 ppm) is not very encyclopedic. I'm not quite sure how to rephrase it - possibly and may contains trace amounts of heavy metals such as lead and arsenic or just remove it.
I don't like the opening sentence in Side effects, which currently reads No side effects were observed during the intake of calcium ?-HMB, though you should always make sure to keep to the prescriptions.. Either remove, or figure out how to fold it into the subsequent sentences, if it arises from the same referenced study.
As above, the chemical diagram would look better if it were an SVG, although this one is not as hard to read.
Please add some categories. See WP:CAT if you don't know what this means. See Leucine for examples.--SPhilbrick T 22:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William R. Hawkins

I request feedback on William R. Hawkins The item is biographical note on a conservative writer. Eamonn FingletonEfingleton (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC) (I removed some redundant sections and entries)--SPhilbrick T 18:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect he meets the Notability requirement, but you haven't established that. While you do have some references, I didn't see any that meet the reliable source standard. While the existing references are fine to support the points they are used to support, I didn't see any that help establish his notability. According to his bio, he "has published over 140 articles". Surely some can be linked, but the key is to find some coverage of him in newspapers and other reliable sources.

Assuming you can find those, check out Article Layout to see how an article should be organized, specifically the creation of a WP:LEAD.

Please check out WP:CITE and footnotes, to see how references should be created.

Sorry, sounds like a fair amount of work, but Biographies of living persons are help to a high standard.--SPhilbrick T 23:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

metroMAGAZINE

user:spiritofomaha/metroMAGAZINE is about a company in Omaha that does monthly magazine publications. Im asking for feedback on this article. SpiritofOmaha.com (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This sounds like an advertisement and lacks a neutral point of view, and I wonder what your relationship with this magazine is given your user name. I also don't know if this magazine is notable. I googled briefly and can't find any reliable 2nd or 3rd party sources that discuss this magazine. Nuujinn (talk) 00:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rapper Fat Tone

(FAT TONE User:Originalrecordz/Fat-Tone)

17:48, 27 January 2010 (UTC)BiggKhrisco (talk)

(I removed some redundant sections and entries)--SPhilbrick T 18:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

International media reaction to Barack Obama's election

I would like to invite feedback on this draft article on the international media reaction to Barack Obama's 2008 election. Please note that images are available to improve the article's look and will be added once the page is published. Please leave comments on the draft's discussion page. Thank you! --Amandaroyal (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:BufordWrite/Battersea_(Petersburg,_VA)

Hello -

I've created a new page for a historically significant property in Petersburg, VA. I did use the Article Wizard and have tried to include as much info, sources and other details as I can. Any comments or feedback is appreciated as this is my first wiki article. Thanks!!

BufordWrite (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, number one, you need to link those references to the actual points in the text of your article. You've got quite a few references there and my brief glance says this is probably okay as a subject matter and the writing looks (from the little I read) to be appropriate. But you need to fix those reference links and check out your categories too. They're all the wrong color. I think it's probably a capitalization problem. Happens to me too -- I'm new, as well. But you look to be off to a good start! In future, it's helpful to put a link to the article in the request itself, too. The title of the request (which becomes a section header) is not linked, so you have to repeat it in the request again, this time, wikilinked. Hope this helps! Marrante (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, check out WP:CITE and footnotes for help.--SPhilbrick T 02:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:UAB Wiki/Underwater Archaeology Branch, Naval History & Heritage Command

I have undertaken my first wikipedia page to draw attention to a very interesting branch of the NHHC which does not get recognized, although there are numerous mentions of UAB in H.L. Hunley and CSS Alabama. I feel confident my page is well written, but I am having a hard time knowing whether I have the necessary references to be considered encyclopedic. Any feed back would be most welcome. User:UAB Wiki/Underwater Archaeology Branch, Naval History & Heritage Command

UAB Wiki (talk) 21:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Leachers, 19 February 2010[reply]

Decent start, fair amount of interesting information, however, you need some work on references. I assume some of the material came from here, but you need to identify the source of each fact. Check out WP:CITE and footnotes for help.

I also suspect that there are dedicated editors at this task force page who may be interested in providing specific help. Just contact one or more at their talk page.--SPhilbrick T 02:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bungaroosh

I've just written a draft of my first article, User:Shermarama/Bungaroosh, and I'd appreciate some feedback. It's heavily based on one source, which reflects my experience of this peculiar building material very well. Other sources are proving difficult to find, because it's a really specifically regional building material only found in the Brighton area - its obscurity, the fact that most people don't know what sort of mess they've bought, is part of its notability. But does it sound sufficiently notable for wikipedia? Worth carrying on trying to find other references? --Shermarama (talk) 22:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not _sure_ if it's notable, given it's limited usage--but then Clutch is just about as notable. It sounds like an interesting topic tho, and there are a lot of different building materials up here. I did find a couple of references:

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-5278654.html

http://www.buildingopinions.com/Archive/S/stamford.html

Also see http://www.urbanwords.info/supplement.php?initial=B, there's reference to Rob Fraser in regard to Bungaroosh, you might see if you can track that down.

Nuujinn (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback. The Rob Fraser article (the one referred to on urbanwords is the same single reference I've got) seems to be the only source article anywhere - would adding other references that mention bungaroosh, rather than being about it, help establish its notability? --Shermarama (talk) 19:29, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on the nature of the source. What you really want are books or newspaper articles, but if you find a reference to a particular aspect of the topic, other sources might work. If you're local to the area, you might contact newspapers or libraries to see if they have any references.

Take a look at this:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/impact-funding-to-aid-heritage-1428094.html

I think that's a good source, since it's from a reliable newspaper and references a public program designed to cope with the problems related to the building material. Nuujinn (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown Sailor of Hindhead, Surrey, England

Feedback on....

Unknown Sailor please

BTP51 (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gifted Education Resource Institute

This article outlines Purdue University's gifted education programs through a division called Gifted Education Resource Institute. The founder, John Feldheusen is one of the premier names in gifted education and does not yet have a page but I am working on that as well. This can fit in nicely with the other Purdue and College of Education pages and could be a great resource for people in the midwest that are interested in GT.

Geri Purdue (talk) 22:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geri Purdue/Gifted Education Resource Institute DES ^(talk) 06:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General Paul Johnson

I wrote an article on General Paul Johnson, and I'm looking for some feedback. I found a few sources, and he meets the guidelines for notability, but I haven't found much on his actual career. I'm hoping someone could help with that. Rin tin tin 1996 (talk) 15:32, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely needs a fair amount of work. Check out WP:CITE and footnotes to see how to add references. (While you listed two external sites that should qualify as references, you didn't include the footnotes to identify the source of information.)

This page is for general help, I suggest that you talk to someone with experience regarding military biographies, as there is a style and format desired for those biographies, and those involved in the project are likely to be interested in helping and know how to find additional sources to help you.

Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/United States military history task force, in general. Note the list of members, along with their areas of interest/expertise. For example, User:Colgator lists US Air Force. Consider leaving a note at the talk page of one or more of the project, and I'll bet they'll be willing to help. If you don't know how to leave a message at a Talk page, click on the word "talk" after their name, then click on "new Section" at the top of the page, and ask them to contact you. They'll respond at your talk page.--SPhilbrick T 01:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pasquill Cavaliero

Hi folks,

Please provide some feedback on the new page. I'm especially interested in informed or expert opinion from those with a knowledge of early modern literature and theology, if we have such experts on board. Thanks!--BenJonson (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a request here

You are encouraged to contact Ret.Prof yourself, he promises not to bite.--SPhilbrick T 22:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion in New Jersey page

Is there a way to include magazines in the New Jersey page? I'd like to include New Jersey Business magazine, the oldest business magazine in New Jersey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinlynne (talk • contribs) 17:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a section on media, but it isn't perfectly clear where it belongs. I suggest you think about where it belongs (perhaps changing Newspapers to Newspapers and Magazines, but post your proposal at the Talk Page, in case someone has a better idea. If there are no objections or better ideas, go for it.--SPhilbrick T 22:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Lombardi

Arlombardi (talk) 19:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your userid id suggests you may not be able to maintain a neutral point of view, and the article reads like an advertisement. Until the TV episode is shown, I'm not sure this Antony Lombardi is notable, and I think the article also needs additional reliable sources to establish notability. Nuujinn (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:COI. While it may seem odd that you would be discouraged from contributing to an article when you probably know more than any other editor, it actually makes sense in the context of the Wikipedia goals. All is not lost, though, if someone else creates an article, you are permitted, even encouraged, to post information to the related Talk Page, suggesting corrections, addition, or relevant sources, but other, uninvolved editors should make the changes.--SPhilbrick T 22:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TARGIT, a novel technique for delivering radiotherapy in the operating theatre.

I've drafted a page on this in my userspace: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Norman21/TARGIT Please have a look and let me have your comments before I move it into mainspace. Thanks. Norman21 (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend reviewing our guideline on citing sources, and specifically i would suggest the use of {{Cite journal}}. Specifically, it is not helpful to use abbreviated names of journals on Wikipedia, no matter how common that may be in other publications. Providing a link to an online version of a cited source is very helpful when possible. If the journal has an article on Wikipedia, wiki-linking the name of the journal in the citation can be helpful, but is not required.

Normally I would be inclined to doubt that an experimental technique not yet in general use was notable, but there does seem to be several reliable sources here. Are there any sources that are independent of the group that developed this technique? If not the articel might seem a bit promotional.

There needs to be a clearer explanation for non-technical readers what this technique is, what it does, how it is an improvement on other techniques, and how it fits into a larger context.

Overall this is an excellent start, IMO. DES ^(talk) 06:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the Argesul

I was just wondering if this is ready for launch, so if any comments are available, either voice them here or update the article itself at User:Buggie111/Battle of the Argesul. Pretty fun working on it. Buggie111 (talk) 00:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful to explain what is notable about this battle. I don't know enough about the rules for military notability; if all battles are deemed notable, then this will qualify, but even if true, it would be helpful to explain what is special about this battle - was it important to either side in any particular way?

You have a couple references, but the citation style could be improved. Check out WP:CITE and footnotes for help.

You might check in on this task force page. There are editors hanging out there who may be able to give you more specific feedback.--SPhilbrick T 02:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Laughlin

Last year, I did substantial work on this article over a period of several weeks. I then submitted it for a Good Article nomination, which it failed. I now know that this was indeed not a "good article". I have been a little busy lately, but yesterday and today I have managed to fix many of the problems the GA reviewer said were wrong with the article and am basically if I get a good response here, I will submit it for a peer-review and eventually good article status. If you look at the article's history you will see that this article was a mess before I began editing it last year.BillyJack193 (talk) 06:00, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Been waiting since last night. I actually expected this to take longer, but please look at articles that have been posted first. Most of what has been posted under me has received comment. And check this out for the version of the article directly before I made my first edit in April of last year. [10].BillyJack193 (talk) 22:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the article (it looks good), but I've been mulling over how to respond. I created a few articles, and edited many, but have not gone through the GAN process, so I'm not up to speed on the fine points of what is acceptable and what is not. Frankly, this page is more focused on very new editors (mostly because article wizard creations are directed here. I won't speak for the others who stick their nose in on occasion and respond, but I think most are expecting to help with more basic needs such as adding references. I checked out Wikipedia:Good articles to see if they have a process, but it appears (after a quick read) that you get feedback by submitting it. I gather you are trying to get informal feedback to decide whether you are ready to submit a formal request.

In short, I don't have the requisite experience to help. My suggestion is to visit Wikipedia:Good articles, pick out a couple editors who seem like regulars, and ask them for an informal review. Or you can wait here, and maybe someone will come along and offer thoughts, but requests such as yours are rare (I can't recall any) so it might not happen. Wish I could give you a better answer.--SPhilbrick T 23:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.BillyJack193 (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to do a copyedit soon. For the moment I've done a massive references overhaul, fixing the dates for everything, adding isbns, changing citation templates to specific (everything was cited using cite journal) etc.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark W. Moffett New page to post

I would like to post a new page about the Sociobiologist/National Geographic Top Photograher/Ant expert/etc. Mark Moffett. Below is the draft of the article. I hope that someone will offer feedback before I post it. Thanks. Never did this before. -Roc Ordman

Mark W. Moffett, Ph.D. “Mark has developed a career that combines science and photography, in spite of being a high school dropout. Although his family was not academic, encouraged by his parents he sought out biologists by the age of 12. “ [1] Moffett received his BA in Biology at Beloit College in Wisconsin in 1979. He received his PhD from Harvard University where he studied with E. O. Wilson, who developed the field of sociobiology. Mark was the first PhD candidate that Wilson had accepted in about a decade, but Mark was so fascinated by ant behavior that Wilson agreed to accept him as a student. Moffett taught himself novel photographic techniques for his 1989 Ph.D. on ants. National Geographic magazine published these novel photographs. Moffett went on to be the curator of ants at Harvard, and then to direct Harvard's Museum of Comparative Zoology. His research concerns insect social behavior and the structure and dynamics of forest ecosystems, particularly their canopies. He travels the world studying different insects and ecosystems. He has investigated canopies of the Amazon rain forest, where he operates a research station in Peru. He also has worked on the supertall coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest, for which he led the first ever ascent and study of the world's tallest tree, known as the National Geographic redwood. In 1993 Harvard University Press published Moffett's book, The High Frontier: Exploring the Tropical Rainforest Canopy. He has a new book coming out in early 2010. Today his research and National Geographic photography are interspersed with writing and public lecturing about rain forests. In 2010, he is Research Associate, NMNH, the Smithsonian Institution, Associate Curator, the University of California, Berkeley, and Contract Photographer, National Geographic Magazine. He also operates a research station in the Amazon Rainforest in Peru along the Amazon River. A photomural he produced there can be seen at Olbrich Botanical Gardens in Madison, WI.

A web search of his name reveals a host of books, photos, articles, prizes, TV appearances, and other achievements of this remarkable explorer who began with a devotion to learning.

^[1] Top photographer for National Geographic

First of all, let me welcome you here.

I think what you may want to do to get started is use the new article wizard to walk you through creation of this article. This page is not intended for posting of drafts--rather, you should create an article in your user space or elsewhere and then post a request for feedback here. That being said, this is a nice start--the prose is somewhat rough, but that's not unusual for a draft. What you really need, though, are some verifiable and reliable sources to help you establish Moffett as a notable person, such as newspaper or magazine articles. It's not really sufficient to say that a web search will reveal these, what you need to do is put citations within the article. Nuujinn (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mitchmarx1/Grad_Associates

User:Mitchmarx1/Grad_Associates Mitchmarx1 (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad as a start, but additional references are needed to establish notability. One source that is a 4-paragraph story is not really enough. Also, there should be more about what this firm actually did -- mentions of notable buildings or projects on which they worked for example, or innovations that they introduced. None of that should be overly hard to add, i would hope. DES ^(talk) 16:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TuneVibez

Link: User:Charliebobgordon/TuneVibez Charliebobgordon (talk) 16:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This needs more citations, particularly to independent reliable sources, both to support the facts stated, and to establish notability. Your current citations are to "The Year's Best Small Business on Twitter" which seems to be a user-voted award award thus not a reliable source at all. Your further reading section currently lists writings by two people involved with this project, which are therefore not independent, and a you-tube link which is highly unlikely to be considered a reliable source --youtube almost never is. The external links are no better: sites by involved people, blogs, twitter, youtube, facebook and a forum. Not a reliable source in the lot, by Wikipedia standards. You need independent, published comment. I advise that you consult WP:CITE, WP:RS, and WP:WEB. Mind you, with better sources, this isn't a bad start on an article. The main issue is establishing notability. I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 17:01, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that this all seems to be an advertisement. I see that you are a new member of wikipedia, but you might read up on Wikipedia and conflict of interest. From your userid and the TuneVibez web site, can I assume that you are the DJ and webmaster for TuneVibez? If so, I congratulate you on the effort that you and your friends are putting into this endeavor, but wikipedia is not an appropropriate place to promote your business. I agree with DES that the article is pretty good, but you will definitely need better sources. Nuujinn (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vukovi Beograd

Vukovi Beograd article Vukovi_Beograd --Alexbgd83 (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Aleksandar Andjelkovic 21.2.2010[reply]

Ir looks very good and is well--written, subject seems notable enough. However, there are no inline citations. I'm sure that since you were able to write such a good article on the subject, you got your information from somewhere. Simply credit your sources. Hope this helps.BillyJack193 (talk) 21:55, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References can be tricky, but check out WP:CITE and footnotes, which should help you. Come back if it isn't clear, and we can provide an example.--SPhilbrick T 22:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mehgan Heaney-Grier

The name of the article is Mehgan Heaney-Grier. The wikilink is Mehgan Heaney-Grier or [[11]] - (not sure which link will work).

I authored and posted this article for wikipedia. It is about freediver Mehgan Heaney-Grier who, in 1996, established the first-ever freedive record for both men and women in the United States. Additionally, she is an actress, model and has hosted, been featured in and produced many television shows.

This article was done in conjunction with Mehgan for fact verification and with her permission. She has also given permission (in writing) to Wikipedia to use the images that are included in the article and on/in Wikipedia Commons.

Lastly, I saw the clean up tag requesting fewer photos in the article - thus we removed two of them.

Please give us any other feedback that might help us better the article.

Thank you, Petey Jones and Mehgan Heaney-Grier 2/21/2010 Mhg165 (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is too bad, but it comes off as promotional, and although she's clearly notable, the article needs additional 2nd and 3rd parties references. I don't think it quite reaches neutral point of view. The lede says she's a naturalist, and I see that she's working towards graduation, but the article would be better if it listed her work in this area beyond hosting tv shows and giving talks, especially if she has any publications. The http://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/news/features/0107_ecocenter.html link doesn't mention her, so I think it may not be relevent. As for the pics, I think the face shot and the shot of her deep diving are the only pics you need for this purpose. She's an attractive women, but my thought is that a picture should add to the content in a substantial way. The mermaid shot isn't explained--I'm guessing she worked with Weeki Wachee, if so, why not mention that? Also, I'd suggest dropping the last two external links--linking to her facebook and youtube pages suggest the purpose of the article is promotional in nature. Nuujinn (talk) 00:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Prometheus Institute

Dlasker88 (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not a bad start. It needs more details if possible, and more references, particularly from news sources, if possible. References should not be just bare links, but should include such metadata as the name of the work, the title of the articel or story or web page, the date of publication, the author when known, etc. If the reference is a bare link, all data can be lsot if the link goes bad, and a user looking at the list of references needs to follow each one to see what sort of sources are being used. I recommend the use of the citation templates, although this is not required.

I have adjusted most, but not all, of the references to use citation templates.

~~Oh the last reference, the one to http://www.statehousecall.org/ doesn't seem top mention the subject at all. Perhaps the story is now in the archives?~~

my error, the site is run by the organization.

Nice work so far. I hope this is helpful. DES ^(talk) 02:42, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hello design

Hello Design

Helloscott99 (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:HealthGal/Tracey_Powell

This is an article about Tracey Powell, a healthcare entrepreneur who is highly-recognized in the industry as having produced the first and only FDA-approved at-home kits for anonymous HIV and Hepatitis-C testing. By de-stigmatizing STD testing and providing an online, confidential forum for risk evaluation and expert test recommendations, he has enabled thousands who otherwise would not have sought out such information to receive anonymous STD testing, and subsequent treatment as applicable.

HealthGal (talk) 01:34, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sun Yat-sen's prayer at the tomb of the Hongwu Emperor

Hi

This is my first article (lot of fun). In fact I have never edited a page either. I was going through the page on Sun Yat-sen trying to find out about this prayer that he made at the tomb of the Hongwu Emperor. I had seen a reference to the fact that Sun Yat-sen had visited and prayed at the tomb three days after he took power in a book on the Forbidden city. I got very curious as to why he, who had been trying to overthrow the Qing dynasty, would visit the tomb of the founder of the Ming dynasty. In any case one thing led to another and I managed to find the original prayer mentioned in a book published in 1912.

I would like to add a reference to this prayer in Sun Yat-sen's original article and as such would like to add the prayer itself as an article which can be then be linked.

User:MalikFeb2010/Sun Yat-sen's prayer at the tomb of the Hongwu Emperor

MalikFeb2010 (talk) 04:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For starters, welcome to Wikipedia. Please continue to edit here. Looking at the article on Sun Yat-Sen, I see no reason for this to be a separate article. But it is very well written and sourced and probably belongs within the article if it is indeed notable enough. Unfortunately, I do not know enough about his life to tell you if it is notable or not, but regardless, it does not need its own article.BillyJack193 (talk) 04:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick feedback. I think this was a very graceful tribute by Sun Yat-sen to the Ming Emperor and as such should be part of the page on him - also points to the centuries long conflicts that have taken place between the Chinese Han race and the Eastern and Western Tartars. I presume (not sure how it gets determined if it is notable enough or not) that it will be okay for me to go ahead and figure out the appropriate place and add it into the original Sun Yat-sen article.MalikFeb2010 (talk) 05:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From what you have said, it is notable enough, so go ahead and add it. If you put it in the wrong place, I am sure some of the other editors of the article will help you out. Good luck.BillyJack193 (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miaohui

Literally Temple Fair, this is a festivity common in China during the Chinese New Year. A lot of materials are already present on Chinese WP. I wonder if anyone wants to have a look and make some translations if possible. It is amazing that no article exists yet about this tradition.Btmachine333667 (talk) 09:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Johnnie Bassett

I created a new article, which was nominated for speedy deletion under section G12. Eventually I had the item returned to my user page, here - User:Derek R Bullamore/Johnnie Bassett. I have had several trial attempts at re-writing it, but always seem to end up back in the same place. Correspondence on my user talk page, here - User talk:Derek R Bullamore, may give you more background. Basically I am stuck, and would much appreciate another pair of eyes to try to knock this into shape. Please do feel free to sub-edit the 'draft' article itself, if this is easier for you. Maybe it is me that needs knocking into shape, not the article ! Many thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Council of Residential Specialists

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Residential_Specialists I have created an article about the largest subsidiary for the national association of realtors. They are a non for profit council that has several different functions in the real estate market. Thank you for your time!

216.21.37.146 (talk) 15:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)Rob Kairis 02/22/10[reply]

Alpha, Washington

Sorry if I'm asking for feedback too often, but I would like to know what is left before I launch User:Buggie111/ Alpha, Washington. I've nearly knocked myself insane finding info about this, and I'd like to move it to it's namespace home as part of my unannounced de-redlink the Lewis County, washington tempalte campaign. Constructive critiscisim would be appreciated.

Buggie111 (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Visionlearning.com

I just created the article Visionlearning.com Visionlearning.com and would love some feedback on the tone, etc. I've tried to be as unbiased as possible, but am not sure if some of my descriptions seem too favorable.

Thanks! Neopropism (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^ Photographer of National Geographic

[1] Photographer of National Geographic

[1]

@@ Line 2,557: / Line 2,557: @@
 [[User:Buggie111|Buggie111]] ([[User talk:Buggie111|talk]]) 17:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
+== Visionlearning.com ==
+I just created the article Visionlearning.com [[Visionlearning.com]] and would love some feedback on the tone, etc. I've tried to be as unbiased as possible, but am not sure if some of my descriptions seem too favorable.
+Thanks!
+[[User:Neopropism|Neopropism]] ([[User talk:Neopropism|talk]]) 17:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:19, 22 February 2010

The Chain Gang of 1974

Mark Siddall (artist)

Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Georgia

David Siegel (musician)

Klingle Road

Sinus Dynamics

eCamp

Kim West

Feedback - True North Productions

Daisy Alliance

cirumference of an oval

Cynthia Cozette Lee

The Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women

Madison, Sirius/XM Satellite Radio DJ

The_Inquisition_(underground_newspaper)

Andre Begin

David R. Gamperl

Sustainable Electronics Initiative

Jimmy Nichols

Early Life

Career

Recent

References

External links

Scoliosis Research Society

Lily Eskelsen

Pixetell

Tika and The Dissidents

Premier Asia

Swami Shri Punitachariji

John Kador

Stephen Paley

Deshbandhu: Hindi Newspaper

The_Gore_Effect

User:Tnakagiri/SkyOne Federal Credit Union

There is Love and There is Fear

Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis

Mars to Stay

Reverend Bob Childress

Comunis

Chris Kovarik

LocalEats

correct date of birth

Bert Morgan

Jason Smart

Jerome Elston Scott

Globe effect (optics)

bolt-on acquisition

Cowbell Digital Music

New article on Pt. R.K. Bijapure Indian music maestro

QualNet

George T. Heery

de Cusack

Jason Smart 2

Risk Analyses, Assessment and Management (RAAM)

David Joseph Marcou

GameSystem

HicCalc

Digital Leather

Chronicles of the Nerds

The Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis

The Challenge Series

SME Dynamic Systems LTD

Nuzhat J. Haneef

Werd (S.O.S)

Qigong Sensory Training

Pacific Buddhist Academy

Nebraska Compromise

Jed Riffe

The National Institute for Metalworking Skills

Edwin James (scientist)

Jeanne Baron french actress in True Blood

Implicit learning

Divorce Fairs

Slade Architecture

Trimatrix data warehousing

Bumper pool

Sigi Schmid

Natalie Wynne Pace