User talk:WölffReik: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:23, 14 June 2013

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, WölffReik! I am Esskater11, and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Esskater11 19:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic players

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --John (talk) 18:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Turnbull AC's (gang)

I have nominated The Turnbull AC's (gang), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Turnbull AC's (gang). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove necessary tags

Please do not deleted unreferenced tags from articles unless you actually add references.Spylab (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not delete legitimate AFD tags. Doing so is considered vandalism and could lead to your account being blocked.Spylab (talk) 19:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Timm Klose

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Timm Klose, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Timm Klose. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently recreated or reposted material at Timm Klose which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding your edit to Irish Mob.

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 18:12, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Scottish Mob

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Scottish Mob, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:44, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:42, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Ramsey (Scottish footballer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scott Ramsey (Scottish footballer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Orphans (gang)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Orphans (gang), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Baseball Furies (gang)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Baseball Furies (gang), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:The Warriors gangs

I have nominated Category:The Warriors gangs (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:09, 13 January 2009 (UTC) fuck off bitch[reply]

Michael Ljunggren

Hello, I noticed that we had created articles on Michael Ljunggren in parallell on enwiki & svwiki. A question on one line in the article. You wrote "Ljunggren was born into a working-class family in the south of Sweden and was just six years old when his father was murdered". The Swedish article which you referred to was very interesting, and included statements from his mother Inger, but nothing on his social class background or his father. It does however state that Michael's two children were 6 and 10 when their father was killed - was it perhaps a mistranslation? Regards, Tomas e (talk) 17:08, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to The Finks MC, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Orkan Avci

An article that you have been involved in editing, Orkan Avci, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orkan Avci. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. — Kpalion^(talk) 11:34, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sons of Anarchy Motorcycle Club

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sons of Anarchy Motorcycle Club, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of gangs from Sons of Anarchy. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well done!

Great job on all the SOA expansion. I'm working on a Tara Knowles page to add to the collection. Thank you for your wonderful work so far. The show deserves it! jengod (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fictional characters are not part of WPBiography

Hi. I would like to inform you that fictional characters are not part of WPBiography, so I removed many tags you added recently. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 23:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juice Ortiz

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Juice Ortiz, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No third party references, no real information, not important fictional character

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 23:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Juice Ortiz

I have nominated Juice Ortiz, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juice Ortiz. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 06:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Otto Delaney

I have nominated Otto Delaney, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Delaney. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 08:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:HappySOA.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HappySOA.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 19:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:OttoDelaney.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:OttoDelaney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steve Crossin ^{The clock is ticking....} 01:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Free souls

Hi. Can you leave a note on the talk page as to why you moved Free Souls back? The media seem to normally call them the Free Souls Motorcycle Club.--Dbratland (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and move the page again. Please discuss at Talk:Free Souls Motorcycle Club if you have a reason why you want to move it back.--Dbratland (talk) 00:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the talk page and edit summary to explain your page moves.

I see you moved the page Gypsy Joker Motorcycle Club, and someone else moved it back. I don't pretend to have all the answers on what page names should be, but I try to explain my moves in the reasons box. Please propose a move at Talk:Gypsy Joker Motorcycle Club if you have reasons why the page should be moved. Thanks! --Dbratland (talk) 17:38, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I take it back; I just saw your comments at Talk:Free Souls Motorcycle Club. Carry on. --Dbratland (talk) 18:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of gangs in the Saints Row series

The article List of gangs in the Saints Row series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is nothing but a list of fictional characters from a video game. No real world perspective just in-universe info. Only source is primary (the video game itself).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. L0b0t (talk) 14:31, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Half-SackEpps.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Half-SackEpps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:MarcusAlvarez.jpg)

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:MarcusAlvarez.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 01:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vagos MC

Hello, WölffReik. You have new messages at Talk:Vagos_Motorcycle_Club#http:.2F.2Fbitterqueen.typepad.com.2F_is_a_blog..
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

3RR Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Travis Bickle. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

48 hours for major 3RR vio. Please refrain from such conduct in the future. Moreschi (talk) 01:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:OttoDelaney.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:OttoDelaney.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. feydey (talk) 18:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JuiceOrtiz.jpg

I have tagged File:JuiceOrtiz.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. feydey (talk) 18:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HappySOA.jpg

I have tagged File:HappySOA.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. feydey (talk) 18:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject River City

You have recently edited articles relating to the Scottish drama River City. You may be interested in joining WikiProject River City. If so, please add your name to the participants' list. Andrewmc123 21:52, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional Jews

Hello. I deleted Category:Fictional Jews under criterion G4 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion.

You can find the deletion discussion here.

If you believe the category should not have been deleted, you may raise these concerns at Deletion review. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:14, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for an article

I was interested in your Asian Boyz article which made me wonder why isn't there a Tiny Rascal Gang article if it's bigger, I have done my research, and i would do this article my self however all the articles i have done before have not followed the 'wiki rules.' If you are up for it i reckon it would be a good idea to do this article.

Here is all you need

Tiny Rascal Gang Apparently Largest Asian street gang. Links [1] [2] [3] [4] [articles.latimes.com/2003/mar/28/world/fg-cambodia28] [5] [6] [7] [8][9] the next link has a possible image [10] and also the Gangland episode could be also useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.28.143.137 (talk) 09:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional Iraqis

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional Iraqis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 18:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The gutting of Chan Ka-Kui

I had to remove the plot summaries from Chan Ka-Kui due to copyright reasons. Unless the source material is in the public domain or has been released under a Wikipedia-compatible license, it must be rewritten before being allowed into the encyclopedia.

Please consider adding plot summaries in your own words for the films. Thank you. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:31, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and reply to Talk:Chan Ka-Kui#Uncertain origin of quite a bit of text. Thanks. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mattias Nilsson (Mercenaries)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Mattias Nilsson (Mercenaries). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mattias Nilsson (Mercenaries). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dean Amasinger

I have nominated Dean Amasinger, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dean Amasinger. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TreyGeek (talk) 00:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JenniferMuiMercs.jpg

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:JenniferMuiMercs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

...respond to [11] this. And also take some time to read WP:GNG, WP:WAF. --EEMIV (talk) 15:47, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected attempt at vote-rigging

I strongly suspect the editor behind your WolffReik account also has edited under the anonymous IP addresses 90.208.53.16, 90.202.94.11 and/or 90.202.94.99. In general, editing under an IP and a registered account is just fine -- until it comes to points of contention such as AfDs. Two of these IPs and you !voted at the Manon Batiste AfD. I will be keeping an eye on your contributions and these IPs'; if I see similar overlap again, I will initiate a checkuser request that might lead to your editing privileges being blocked. --EEMIV (talk) 22:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you also attempted to vote-stack in an AfD for Dean something-or-other. I have typed up the evidence for a sockpuppet investigation, which can lead to your editing privileges being blocked. I will submit it if I see any further evidence of an attempt to offer multiple votes at an AfD. Additionally, WP:3RR violations involving your registered account and IP addresses will spurn me to file it, along with anything else that makes clear you are attempting to game the system. --EEMIV (talk) 16:12, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I am not particularly inclined to copy-and-paste talk-page warnings and messages here and on your various IP talk pages -- but, I will at least keep them here. Note that an addition restoration of content at the Swedish mercenary web page -- content that is supposedly cited, but is not in fact at all substantiated by the claimed source -- will violate WP:3RR. This will lead to an editing block as surely as ongoing abuse of multiple IP socks and attempted AfD vote-stacking (see above). Furthermore, your persistent failure to respond to these concerns on your talk page, while otherwise engaging in editing, does not reflect well upon you. --EEMIV (talk) 20:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jennifer Mui

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jennifer Mui. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Mui. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I notice a lot of your articles are being put up for deletion. I can relate completely. :( You maybe interested in our group, which helps to rescue articles by adding reliable sources.

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Hello, WölffReik. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip 00:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting other editors comments

You may not know that it is perfectly okay to delete any sub-section of your talk page without responding. I personally find this avoids argument. Ikip 00:48, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JenniferMuiMercs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JenniferMuiMercs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jack Merridew 19:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Wolffreik, I just wanted to say hi and thank you for all the work with the SOA related articles and images. I just saw your post on the talk page for SOA, Let me know if you need help with anything specific. Happy Editing and Keep up the good work. --Theo10011 (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I read your post........I dont know how much you know about the second season wolf but most of the characters you mentioned in your message end their story arcs in 2nd season itself, except maybe cameron hayes who might be important in the 3rd season. Besides him, other character story arc either ends or they never develop much further, like chuck and wendy whose current bio wouldn't be much longer than their description on the character page for SOA. I can still create pages for them if you want, but the character profile would be the same size as the description on the SOA character page since they aren't primary characters. Let me know what you think. --Theo10011 (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JuiceOrtiz.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JuiceOrtiz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 10:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martial arts articles for AfD

If you're going to tag articles as being "included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions", then you should put them in that list. I listed the Mike Groves article there for you, but I see you have another one in the Athletes category that you claim is in the martial arts list (Joe Sampieri), even though it's not. Please try to make sure you list the articles in the sections you say they're listed in. Papaursa (talk) 01:54, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Otto Delaney

I have nominated Otto Delaney, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Delaney (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 07:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Opie Winston

I have nominated Opie Winston, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opie Winston. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Magioladitis (talk) 07:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OpieWinston.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OpieWinston.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OttoDelaney.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OttoDelaney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brödraskapet (The Brotherhood) Swedish prison gang

The name Brödraskapet (The Brotherhood)

This is how Brödraskapet (The Brotherhood) describes there own namne

quote

The clubs name has always been Brödraskept (The Brotherhood)

The appendix ”MC” was used by the Stockholm champer between the years 1995-98.

"Wolfpack" was used initially as an expression for the members inside the Swedish prison. Today Wolfpack can best be compared to a nation. Wolfpack is our nation

end quote

source: Brödraskapets (The Brotherhood) website

http://www.brodraskapet.se —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemesislupo (talk • contribs) 08:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop changing the wikipedia text on the Swedish prison gang Brödraskapet (The Brotherhood). Your infomation on the subject is not correct.

--Nemesislupo (talk) 07:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:46, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please cut it out

All this stale reverting is improper. As I see it at least Kung Fu Man and I have supported these redirects and you simply revert back a few days later. This is non-notable material and it is inappropriate. On the list you reverted a whole heap of other edits, too, and in the template, you're blindly restoring links to deleted stuff. No Cookie. Jack Merridew 23:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cage Rage

Hi. I've just noticed your work to Cage Rage articles (namely creating CR 27 and 28). Just want to say nice work. It's good to see someone else creating them. I created 16 (I think it was) a while back and got fed up as it took way too long. Keep up the good work! Paralympiakos (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cage Rage25 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cage Rage25 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CageRage18 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CageRage18 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CageRage15 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CageRage15 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SAMCRO.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SAMCRO.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:45, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Ramsey (Scottish footballer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scott Ramsey (Scottish footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Echetus Xe 19:17, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scott Ramsey (Scottish footballer)

The article Scott Ramsey (Scottish footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:ATH as far as I can see from this unreferenced BLP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 21:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:07, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BAMMA logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BAMMA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple infoboxes

Please don't add multiple infoboxes to articles unless there is a reason to do so. The Infobox in the lead should correspond to what the individual is primarily known for. You don't need to use another infobox to summarize martial arts accomplishments; that can be done in a paragraph or a table. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ChrisJacobsMercs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ChrisJacobsMercs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MattiasNilssonMercs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories: Martial Artists and Martial Arts

I notice that you are doing a lot of work with MA categories and I would like to ask a favor.

Last year in the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts we did a Wikipedia:WikiProject Martial arts/Article Review using the Catscan tool [12] to scan for the 'Notability' tag in all Martial Arts articles. The category trees were quite interwoven. To make the categories more useful and smaller, we separated 'Martial Arts' from 'Martial Artists'.

The favor: for example, rather than putting Category:American_kickboxers under Category:Kickboxing_in_the_United_States, could you put

Any proofs that Oleinik trained Freestyle Wrestling as a style on a regular basis, please (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexey_Oleinik and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alexey_Oleinik). Till then I've to revert it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.232.152.118 (talk) 17:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{see also|Category:American_kickboxers}} at the top of Category:Kickboxing_in_the_United_States and

{{see also|Category:Kickboxing_in_the_United_States}} at the top of Category:American_kickboxers Thanks for you help! It will make the cleaning easier. ~~~~ {{subst:di-orphaned fair use-notice|1=ChrisJacobsMercs.jpg}} ~~~~

Proposed deletion of Paul McShane (Scottish footballer)

The article Paul McShane (Scottish footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MMA Project flags petition

Good loooin' out on that. It's about time something like this was brought up. It was getting annoying seeing the same group of people removing the flags. I personally believe it looks better and more complete with them Delinquent1904 (talk) 15:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons and the discussion at WP:MMA

Hello, I couldn't help but notice that you've been contacting many editors to sign your petition to re-add flag icons back to MMA articles. This activity looks a lot like WP:CANVASSING and is generally considered to be disruptive behavior. Inviting interested parties to participate in a discussion in a neutral manner is one thing, but what you appear to be doing is votestacking (see the previous link). I should also point out that on Wikipedia we do not make decisions by vote (see WP:VOTE) but through discussion and consensus building. There is a very long discussion at WT:MMA about why flag icons should not be included in MMA articles (going along with the project-wide consensus of Wikipedia which you can read here) which I hope you will participate in. I look forward to reading your contributions to the discussion. Thanks. SQGibbon (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Petition to bring Flags back

I see you started a petition to bring the flagicons back in the record boxes. I would just like to say thank you because someone needed to do it. I'm 100% with you on this and I just signed the petition. Falcons8455 (talk) 05:56, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification re your petition drive

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 06:32, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Kickboxing update draft

As you may be aware, I have created a proposed update for the project here: User:Jfgslo/WikiProject Kickboxing draft Could you please check the draft and give your comments about it? Only Marty Rockatansky and jsmith006 have been kind enough to check it and I really would appreciate more opinions to improve it. I want this project to become active once again so that kickboxing articles are improved and safe from deletion and then focus on having at least two featured articles. At the moment we cannot even cite the project to asses notability. As I commented with Marty Rockatansky, contentious points will be left out of the update so feel free to criticize anything from the draft. Jfgslo (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OttoDelaney.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OttoDelaney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:28, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Art of War 14 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art of War 14 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art of War 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 04:57, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flags

Hi WolffReik. I've noticed you've done some good work in kickboxing and mma. I'm probably a bit slow but is there anywhere I can petion for getting the flags back as I think it's crazy they are going around removing flags and this won't happen in the kickboxing pages if I can help it (we've had some dudes trying it on here as well). If you've got any queries or need any help let me know. We've also had a lot of people nominating pages for deletion when all they appear to need is some more sources so we need to keep on top of things. Cheers.jsmith006 (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2011

Don't worry about it WolffReik I guess there's been a bit of bother about it. Keep up the good work.jsmith006 (talk) 19:57, 1 July 2011

Upcoming interview with Benny Urquidez

I plan a direct interview with Benny "The Jet" Urquidez for publication within a few weeks. If you have any biographical questions that you would like answered for inclusion in his Wikipedia entry, please leave them on my talk page. Paul Maslak (talk) 22:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic F.C. task force

Hello, you have a userbox which suggests you are a fan of Celtic F.C. I am hoping to start up a task force for Celtic at WikiProject Football.
If you are interested please reply here. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 19:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Royers

WölffReik, thank you for adding this entry. Fred Royers is a great person, an excellent martial arts journalist, a respected color commentator, a very important behind-the-scenes WKA official as well as a legitimate former WKA world champion. He managed the WKA's entry into Europe beginning in 1983. I have his complete early kickboxing record and will post it to the STAR System website within the week if you would like to add it to this entry. Paul Maslak (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WölffReik, I have Alexio's record until I discontinued the STAR ratings, including his early TKO loss as an amateur to Mike King. The PKA and STAR both removed that loss from his pro record because King was a seasoned pro; Alexio was starting out as an amateur. The match was a last-minute substitute that never should have been allowed: novice amateur versus pro world contender. Anyway, you're having trouble finding Alexio's early record because he changed his last name. Alexio is his mother's maiden name. I have Cikatic's rated bouts from that era, but I can probably still find a way to get to his manager/trainer to see what he can provide. Kevin Rosier became prominent after my tenure at STAR. I have nothing on him.

Paul Maslak (talk) 01:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs for kickboxing

I notice your keep !voting. having notable fighters does not guarantee notability. my favorite football club played another notable football club. both sides had notable players this does not guarantee we create an article of a match. none of your keep !votes address the main concerns of lack of third party coverage and you provide no evidence of sources. LibStar (talk) 00:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

please note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 Italy Oktagon 2008. LibStar (talk) 00:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 Spain Battles 2009. LibStar (talk) 00:33, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CageRage19 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CageRage19 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of SuperKombat events

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of SuperKombat events, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mt king^(edits) 22:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SuperKombat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SuperKombat, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mt king^(edits) 22:59, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

A tag has been placed on a page you created requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit [[Talk:{{{1}}}|the article's talk page directly]] to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Mt king^(edits) 23:09, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UltimateGlory13 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UltimateGlory13 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UltimateGlory12 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UltimateGlory12 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:35, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UltimateGlory13 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UltimateGlory13 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:34, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UltimateGlory12 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UltimateGlory12 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 23:59, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

kickboxing result templates

Please stop re-adding deleted articles to the templates. LibStar (talk) 03:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

could you explain why you are recreating kickboxing results articles that have been deleted under clear consensus? LibStar (talk) 03:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 08:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of K-1 World MAX 2011 −70kg Japan Tournament Final

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on K-1 World MAX 2011 −70kg Japan Tournament Final, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cerejota ^{If you reply, please place a {{talkback}} in my talk page if I do not reply soon.} 08:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of K-1 Gladiators 2001

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on K-1 Gladiators 2001, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mt king^(edits) 08:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of K-1 World MAX 2011 −70kg Japan Tournament Final for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article K-1 World MAX 2011 −70kg Japan Tournament Final is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-1 World MAX 2011 −70kg Japan Tournament Final until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RA (talk) 09:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of articles deleted at AfD

Please stop re-creating articles which have been deleted at AfD. They will simply be deleted under WP:CSD#G4. If you disagree with deletion, you should first approach the administrator who closed the deletion discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HerosLithuania2005 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HerosLithuania2005 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 12:21, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi WölffReik,

Glad to meet you. I'm pretty upset with fashion going on martial arts articles. Since Marty and Jsmith are no longer active here, I seriously consider about my presence here. Any idea for matching the criteria claimed to delete K-1 or MMA articles? Please share your thoughts before I decide to quit cause soon I will not be able to stand what is going on. Best Regards, Umi1903 (talk) 21:18, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, they know nothing about these sports and they can judge'em! This is insane. Anyway, mate, I'm in touch with some other users. They'd like to figure a new way out. We might unite and establish our own. Any helps would be very much appreciated. We please keep in touch. Please see my email and feel free to type to me, mate: umi1903 at gmail. Best Regards, Umi1903 (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi WölffReik, any news? Any decision? Btw, I'm in touch with some users outside. We plan to create something externally, like a new website about martial arts? Or at least we can discuss together to see what we've got here and what we can do to enhance our values against the "viruses". Cheers, Umi1903 (talk) 22:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kickboxing

Hi WölffReik,

I have revised the article K-1 World Grand Prix 2008 in Seoul Final 16 to include some of the deleted lower-level fights and would like you to take a look. You are one of the kickboxing experts here, and you should determine what goes in the article. Take note that I got all the deleted articles placed into my userspace by asking an admin nicely. The community has decided that some of the fights shouldn't have a seperate pages, but there is no reason not to put a synopsis in a higher-level fight. You may be able to break out some of them later, but you will need at least 2 independent sources covering that particular event. (Generally, that means newspapers, and the bigger the better) I suspect you may find such coverage in Asian newspapers, but I am not the one to do it for you.

Cheers,

The Steve 14:23, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wilson versus Theriault

WölffReik,

I was the ringside judge who scored this fight for Wilson by 2 points. Regardless of the Black Belt article you cited as source, your entry's description of the fight is not accurate. The Black Belt coverage was not written by an eyewitness. For a broader perspective, check out the contemporaneous accounts in the Montreal newspapers, as well as in Official Karate magazine. Also, please see STAR Equalization Finding #3 at the bottom of Wilson's ring record posted on my website at http://starsystemkickboxing.net/DonWilson.aspx. Wilson was never thrown through the ring ropes by a knockdown or otherwise. You are correct that Theriault scored one clean knockdown in the nineth, but it was a quick down and up again. Theriault simply caught Wilson off-balance; he never landed a solid punch with Wilson's feet planted. Wilson was not shaken up. But Theriault rightfully earned a 10-8 round score.

Outside of that one knockdown, Theriault's power blows universally hit air. Wilson was a ghost, effectively counterattacking out of a mobile defense throughout the entire fight. It was a very strategic, technical match up that, physically, was much closer than it might have appeared to the lay person.

I thought Wilson won a clear but narrow points victory. The Montreal audience, however, apparently disagreed with how close the decision: When the outcome was announced, the audience nearest the ring at first began chanting, "bull-shit, bull-shit, bull-shit" ... then another, louder chorus erupted: "Wil-son, Wil-son, Wil-son." Immediately thereafter, a large gleeful throng rushed into the ring and passed Wilson out of the arena over their shoulders. It looked rather like the ending of the 1986 movie Crocodile Dundee.

In all the fights I witnessed as the STAR kickboxing ratings chief -- and I witnessed thousands -- I've never seen an audience react like that before or since.

Regards, Paul Maslak (talk) 04:06, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kickboxing: Please see this

Dear WölffReik, please check this deletion log of K-1 World Grand Prix Selection 2010, and support, if you could. This might alter the things in favour of martial arts events. Best, Umi1903 (talk) 23:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WölffReik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Dear WölffReik, can you post your contact adress, please? Best regards, Rickr20 (talk) 23:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Alan Omer

Hello, WölffReik, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Omer whether the article Alan Omer should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Alan Omer, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Template:Z82 Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Duncan Airlie James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to WAKO, IKF, WKA and WKO

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One week block for vandalism/disruptive editing on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperKombat (3rd nomination)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 00:13, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:WölffReik is willing to use any tactic to protect his promotional pages. Thank you. Chzz ► 22:01, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Peter Aerts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heel hook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I change heel hook to Leglock#Heel_hookheel hook]]. I think that's the right spot, but if not, please do fix. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 14:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hero's 4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hero's 4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero's 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hero's Events

Template:Hero's Events has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 18:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SuperKombat: Fight Club for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SuperKombat: Fight Club is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperKombat: Fight Club until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mt king^(edits) 00:54, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is WölffReik and his "personal library" of articles.. Thank you. Mt king^(edits) 01:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hero's8 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hero's8 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated socking and copyright violations, see [13]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SuperKombatFightClubjpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SuperKombatFightClubjpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KSWextra jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KSWextra jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BAMMA3 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BAMMA3 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BAMMA2 jpeg.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BAMMA2 jpeg.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:53, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:KSW14 jpeg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:KSW14 jpeg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:KSW13 jpeg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:KSW13 jpeg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:OpieWinston.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:OpieWinston.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:JaxTeller.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:JaxTeller.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:PineyWinston.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:PineyWinston.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carl Seumanutafa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Seumanutafa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Seumanutafa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of The Warriors characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Warriors characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Warriors characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 16:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cage Rage 20 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cage Rage 20 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TreyGeek (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CageRage21 jpeg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CageRage21 jpeg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CageRage22 jpeg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CageRage22 jpeg.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cage Rage 23 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cage Rage 23 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TreyGeek (talk) 16:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 819: / Line 819: @@
 If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "[[Special:Contributions/WölffReik|my contributions]]" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Files|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> [[User:Hazard-Bot|Hazard-Bot]] ([[User talk:Hazard-Bot|talk]]) 04:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
+== Nomination of [[Cage Rage 23]] for deletion ==
+<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[Cage Rage 23]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
+The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 23 ]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
+Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:TreyGeek|TreyGeek]] ([[User talk:TreyGeek|talk]]) 16:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)