Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests: Difference between revisions
→Elizabeth Canning: Support |
→Dresden Triptych: oppose w/ reasons |
||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
*'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Victoriaearle&diff=569283545&oldid=569148047 Oppose]'''. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 01:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
*'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Victoriaearle&diff=569283545&oldid=569148047 Oppose]'''. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 01:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support''': The article passed FA, seems no real reason to oppose TFA. Someone saying they have some sort of vague "issue" with something seems rather bizarre. It's a lovely article. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 17:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Support''': The article passed FA, seems no real reason to oppose TFA. Someone saying they have some sort of vague "issue" with something seems rather bizarre. It's a lovely article. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 17:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' as co-author for the following reasons: 1., the main image still needs to be sorted out so that when the article is show-cased on the front page the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jan_van_Eyck_-_Triptych_of_Mary_and_Child,_St._Michael,_and_the_Catherine_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg high res Google art project image] can be used; b., we have few art articles, fewer still about van Eyck and that well is about to run dry, and one was already featured as TFA in March so best to save this; c., I believe that there might be a request for an art article currently at FAC to run in September, which would put too many from a category that's unrepresented too close together; c., with the colors and the themes suggest to run during the Christmas holidays; d., there's another nomination below, [[Isabeau of Bavaria]], that I wrote too, putting two noms for articles written by the same author in a very close time period. None of these are vague, and would like to see points calculated here. What is vague, however, and not something to be calculated is my request to respect that I've been ill and not put a notification on my page asking to rework a blurb, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AVictoriaearle&diff=569140638&oldid=569118631]. Thanks. [[User:Victoriaearle|Victoria]] ([[User talk:Victoriaearle|talk]]) 18:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
=== Nonspecific date 3 === |
=== Nonspecific date 3 === |
Revision as of 18:48, 20 August 2013
Here the community can nominate articles to be selected as "Today's featured article" (TFA) on the main page. The TFA section aims to highlight the range of articles that have "featured article" status, from Art and architecture through to Warfare, and wherever possible it tries to avoid similar topics appearing too close together without good reason. Requests are not the only factor in scheduling the TFA (see Choosing Today's Featured Article); the final decision rests with the TFA coordinators: Wehwalt, Dank and Gog the Mild, who also select TFAs for dates where no suggestions are put forward. Please confine requests to this page, and remember that community endorsement on this page does not necessarily mean the article will appear on the requested date.
If you have an exceptional request that deviates from these instructions (for example, an article making a second appearance as TFA, or a "double-header"), please discuss the matter with the TFA coordinators beforehand. It can be helpful to add the article to the pending requests template, if the desired date for the article is beyond the 30-day period. This does not guarantee selection, but does help others see what nominations may be forthcoming. Requesters should still nominate the article here during the 30-day time-frame.
|
Featured article candidates (FAC) Today's featured article (TFA):
Featured article tools: | ||||||||
How to post a new nomination:
Scheduling: In the absence of exceptional circumstances, TFAs are scheduled in date order, not according to how long nominations have been open or how many supportive comments they have. So, for example, January 31 will not be scheduled until January 30 has been scheduled (by TFAR nomination or otherwise). |
Summary chart
Currently accepting requests from November 2 to December 2.
Date | Article | Points | Notes | Supports† | Opposes† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonspecific 1 | |||||
Nonspecific 2 | Dresden Triptych | 1 | 1 | ||
Nonspecific 3 | |||||
Nonspecific 4 | |||||
August 28 | Omayra Sánchez | 3? | calc below | 3 | 0 |
August 31 | Everything Tastes Better with Bacon | 4 | date relevance, International Bacon Day | 3 | 0 |
September 8 | Istanbul | 7 | date relevance, vital article, etc. | 2 | 0 |
September 11 | Harry McNish | 3 | birthday, 2 years FA | 2 | 0 |
September 14 | The Hunger Games | 4 | fifth anniversary of publication, widely covered | 2 | 0 |
September 17 | Elizabeth Canning | 3 | day of birth, 2010 FA | 1 | 0 |
September 24 | Isabeau of Bavaria | 3? | see below | 1 | 0 |
† Tally may not be up to date; please do not use these tallies for removing a nomination according to criteria 1 or 3 above unless you have verified the numbers. The nominator is included in the number of supporters.
Nonspecific date nominations
Nonspecific date 1
Nonspecific date 2
Dresden Triptych
A beauty with meaning, - probably better to show only part of the image, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support: The article passed FA, seems no real reason to oppose TFA. Someone saying they have some sort of vague "issue" with something seems rather bizarre. It's a lovely article. Montanabw(talk) 17:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose as co-author for the following reasons: 1., the main image still needs to be sorted out so that when the article is show-cased on the front page the high res Google art project image can be used; b., we have few art articles, fewer still about van Eyck and that well is about to run dry, and one was already featured as TFA in March so best to save this; c., I believe that there might be a request for an art article currently at FAC to run in September, which would put too many from a category that's unrepresented too close together; c., with the colors and the themes suggest to run during the Christmas holidays; d., there's another nomination below, Isabeau of Bavaria, that I wrote too, putting two noms for articles written by the same author in a very close time period. None of these are vague, and would like to see points calculated here. What is vague, however, and not something to be calculated is my request to respect that I've been ill and not put a notification on my page asking to rework a blurb, [1]. Thanks. Victoria (talk) 18:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Nonspecific date 3
Nonspecific date 4
Specific date nominations
August 28
Omayra Sánchez
1 point-Birthday
2 points(?)-I am unsure as to what might be considered a similar article.
3 points(?)-Total QatarStarsLeague (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support Perhaps one point for diversity can be added, too.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Educational and encyclopedic. — Cirt (talk) 16:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support. A harrowing and tragic story. I'd be intrigued to see how this goes in pageviews. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:52, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
August 31
Everything Tastes Better with Bacon
1 point = International Bacon Day this year is 31 August.
1 point = subject underrepresented at WP:FA, topic = bacon.
2 points = a similar article has not been featured on the main page, neither books about bacon nor cookbooks.
4 points = Total. — Cirt (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support, as nom. — Cirt (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Positive ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Points look good, although the underrepresentation point is for "Food and drink" not for bacon specifically. BencherliteTalk 13:20, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support, food underrepresented. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
September 8
Istanbul
- Timing: 1 point (Date relevant to topic, with selection of Olympic host city; see below)
- Importance: 4 points (Vital article)
- Main Page representation: 2 points (No city article within six months)
- Total: 7 points
This is a bit of an unorthodox request here. Istanbul is among the three candidates for host city of the 2020 Summer Olympics, which will be selected on September 7. If Istanbul is chosen to host the event, I feel having Istanbul as TFA the day after would be particularly appropriate. (And if it isn't selected, its choice as TFA would be a bit odd.) Therefore, I'd like to propose this for TFA on September 8, conditional on Istanbul being selected as host city. We should know the host city by 5:30pm, Buenos Aires time (20:30 UTC), on September 7. If it's not selected for the Olympics, I'd then suggest we swap it out with another article, perhaps one of the "emergency" articles. Thoughts? -- tariqabjotu 16:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support TBrandley (T • C • B) 17:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- I wonder whether it would be better for the editors of the other article to do this the other way round - have a non-date-specific article (X) selected to run on 8th September, with the proviso that if Istanbul is chosen as host city then X will be bumped. Otherwise, the principal editors of X will only get a few hours' notice that X is to run, which might not be fair on them... BencherliteTalk 17:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that makes sense, especially since there's a decent chance Istanbul won't be selected as host city and this won't run that day. I feel like that's something in your control though: you can provisionally select a non-date-specific article for September 8, and notify the editors of that article of this arrangement so they won't be surprised if their article is bumped. -- tariqabjotu 17:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Parts of article do not comply with WP:NPOV. See: Talk:Istanbul#Toponymy_and_Lead. Cavann (talk) 16:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
September 11
Harry McNish
2 points for 2007 FA, one for "birthday" --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- I think the photo is rather blurred. Perhaps this one might be better? Simply south...... fighting ovens for just 7 years 21:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
- I'd rather go with no photo than either of them... Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I know that the photo is blurred but even without reading it provides a bit of history, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- I'd rather go with no photo than either of them... Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support. Historical and educational. — Cirt (talk) 16:13, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support. fascinating story - I prefer the blurred photo of the man - better than the grave and better than none. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:10, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
September 14
The Hunger Games
4 points - 1 for date (fifth anniversary of publication), 2 for widely covered, 1 for no similar article within 3 months, unless Franz Kafka counts. I don't get a point for it being my birthday, do I? :) Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 16:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- As an image, File:Suzanne Collins David Shankbone 2010.jpg could work, if we need one. Evanh2008 (talk|contribs) 16:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support - This is one of my favorite books, and having it as the TFA on the fifth anniversary of its publication would be an ideal choice. There is no reason this should not be on the Main Page. Hurricane Andrew (444) 02:03, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support: I haven't read it but the movie was enjoyable. The article looks to be in good shape. Praemonitus (talk) 03:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support - suitable in all respects. The release date for the second film is November 22, so if September doesn't work, maybe November would. But I'm fine with September and the anniversary date. Montanabw(talk) 17:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
September 17
Elizabeth Canning
A woman and a mystery, birthday, 2010 FA, 3 points, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Support:TFA of an article about a woman, also a legal case. Good variety. Montanabw(talk) 17:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
September 24
Isabeau of Bavaria
First of all, this blurb needs to be shortened; I will leave this onerous task to someone else. The points are allocated below:
1 point-date relevancy
2 points-Widely covered
1 point?-Last European royalty/nobility related article was featured either July 27 or May 20, depending on definition
3-4 points?-Total QatarStarsLeague (talk) 12:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Comments: I copied it to the summary chart, please, nominator do it yourself next round. Did you inform the author that you nominated? The picture is good for nothing here, looks abstract in small size. Is there another? Crop one? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2013 (UTC)