Jump to content

CJ-10 (missile): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Rescuing 2 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.7.1)
Line 26: Line 26:
|detonation=
|detonation=
|launch_platform=
|launch_platform=
*[[Type 093 submarine|Type 093G submarine]]<ref name="wct_2015-04-07">{{cite web |url=http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20150407000124&cid=1101 |title=PLA's Type 093G submarines 'could destroy Izumo' |publisher=wantchinatimes.com |date=7 April 2015 |accessdate=5 August 2015}}</ref>
*[[Type 093 submarine|Type 093G submarine]]<ref name="wct_2015-04-07">{{cite web|url=http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20150407000124&cid=1101 |title=PLA's Type 093G submarines 'could destroy Izumo' |publisher=wantchinatimes.com |date=7 April 2015 |accessdate=5 August 2015 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150719075400/http://www.wantchinatimes.com/news-subclass-cnt.aspx?id=20150407000124&cid=1101 |archivedate=19 July 2015 |df= }}</ref>
*[[transporter erector launcher|TEL]]
*[[transporter erector launcher|TEL]]
*[[Xian H-6]] (CJ-20)
*[[Xian H-6]] (CJ-20)
Line 80: Line 80:
*{{cite report |last1=Easton |first1=Ian |date=1 August 2009 |title=The Assassin Under the Radar: China's DH-10 Cruise Missile Program |url=http://project2049.net/documents/assassin_under_radar_china_cruise_missile.pdf |publisher=Project 2049 Institute |accessdate=24 May 2015}}
*{{cite report |last1=Easton |first1=Ian |date=1 August 2009 |title=The Assassin Under the Radar: China's DH-10 Cruise Missile Program |url=http://project2049.net/documents/assassin_under_radar_china_cruise_missile.pdf |publisher=Project 2049 Institute |accessdate=24 May 2015}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Gormley |first1=Dennis M. |last2=Erickson |first2=Andrew S. |last3=Yuan |first3=Jingdong |date=30 September 2014 |title=A Potent Vector: Assessing Chinese Cruise Missile Developments |url=http://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/NewsArticleView/tabid/7849/Article/577568/jfq-75-a-potent-vector-assessing-chinese-cruise-missile-developments.aspx |journal=Joint Forces Quarterly |publisher=[[National Defense University]] |volume= |issue=75 |pages= |doi= |access-date=21 May 2015}}
*{{cite journal |last1=Gormley |first1=Dennis M. |last2=Erickson |first2=Andrew S. |last3=Yuan |first3=Jingdong |date=30 September 2014 |title=A Potent Vector: Assessing Chinese Cruise Missile Developments |url=http://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/NewsArticleView/tabid/7849/Article/577568/jfq-75-a-potent-vector-assessing-chinese-cruise-missile-developments.aspx |journal=Joint Forces Quarterly |publisher=[[National Defense University]] |volume= |issue=75 |pages= |doi= |access-date=21 May 2015}}
*{{Cite report |author=United States National Air and Space Intelligence Center Public Affairs Office |author-link=National Air and Space Intelligence Center |date=11 May 2013 |title=Ballistic &amp; Cruise Missile Threat |url=http://www.25af.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-130710-054.pdf |accessdate=21 May 2015}}
*{{Cite report|author=United States National Air and Space Intelligence Center Public Affairs Office |author-link=National Air and Space Intelligence Center |date=11 May 2013 |title=Ballistic &amp; Cruise Missile Threat |url=http://www.25af.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-130710-054.pdf |accessdate=21 May 2015 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221154659/http://www.25af.af.mil:80/shared/media/document/AFD-130710-054.pdf |archivedate=21 February 2015 |df= }}
*{{Cite report |author=United States Office of the Secretary of Defense |authorlink=Office of the Secretary of Defense |date=2010 |title=Annual Report To Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2010 |url=http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2010_CMPR_Final.pdf |page= |accessdate=21 May 2015}}
*{{Cite report |author=United States Office of the Secretary of Defense |authorlink=Office of the Secretary of Defense |date=2010 |title=Annual Report To Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2010 |url=http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2010_CMPR_Final.pdf |page= |accessdate=21 May 2015}}
*{{Cite report |author=United States Office of the Secretary of Defense |authorlink=Office of the Secretary of Defense |date=2011 |title=Annual Report To Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2011 |url=http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2011_CMPR_Final.pdf |page= |accessdate=21 May 2015}}
*{{Cite report |author=United States Office of the Secretary of Defense |authorlink=Office of the Secretary of Defense |date=2011 |title=Annual Report To Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2011 |url=http://www.defense.gov/pubs/pdfs/2011_CMPR_Final.pdf |page= |accessdate=21 May 2015}}

Revision as of 05:55, 12 November 2016

CJ-10
TypeLand attack cruise missile
Place of origin People's Republic of China
Service history
Used byChina
Production history
ManufacturerChina Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation/China Haiying Electro-Mechanical Technology Academy
Specifications
Warhead500 kg (1,100 lb), conventional or nuclear[1]

Operational
range
>1,500 km (930 mi; 810 nmi)
Launch
platform

The CJ-10 (simplified Chinese: 长剑-10; traditional Chinese: 長劍-10; pinyin: Cháng Jiàn 10; lit. 'long sword 10') is a second-generation[4] Chinese ground based land-attack missile.[5] It is a copy of the Kh-55 missile.[6] It is reportedly manufactured by the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation Third Academy and the China Haiying Electro-Mechanical Technology Academy.[4]

Initially, the CJ-10 was identified as a DH-10 (Chinese: 东海-10; pinyin: Dong Hai 10; lit. 'east sea 10') missile by Western media and analysts.[7][8] In the annual reports submitted to the United States Congress from the United States Department of Defense concerning the Chinese missile, which was classified as a variance of "DH-10" until 2011,[9][10] when it was recognized as the "CJ-10" in 2012.[11][12] Current publications may use both terms interchangeably to identify the missile.[4][13] Ian Easton believes that the CJ-10 is the same missile as the HN-2, and that the HN-3 is the "DH-10A".[14]

Description

In the September 2014 edition of Joint Forces Quarterly, an article reportedly described CJ-10 as a subsonic missile with a range of more than 1,500 km and a 500 kg. payload. The article attributes the missile having a guidance package using inertial navigation system, satellite navigation, Terrain Contour Matching, and a likely Digital Scene-Mapping Area Correlator for terminal guidance. Ships and ground transporter erector launchers were listed as launch platforms.[4]

In 2013, the United States believes that the missile has a range of more than 1,500 km, and can potentially carry either conventional or nuclear payloads;[15] other sources claim the missile has ranges of 2,000 km (1,200 mi; 1,100 nmi),[16] 2,500 km (1,600 mi; 1,300 nmi),[1] or as much as 4,000 km (2,500 mi; 2,200 nmi).[17] In 2004, the CJ-10 was credited with a CEP of 10 m.[18]

The YJ-100 is a subsonic anti-ship missile version of the CJ-10 with a range of 800 km (500 mi; 430 nmi). The missile can be air-launched by the H-6 bomber and fired from a vertical launch system of the Type 055 destroyer.[19] The YJ-100 will have an onboard radar and is potentially a counter to the American Long Range Anti-Ship Missile (LRASM).[1]

Development

The development of the CJ-10 could have potentially benefited significantly from Chinese acquisition of Western and Soviet missile technology in the 1990s, notably the Kh-55 (purchased from Ukraine), and the Tomahawk missiles (that were unexploded and parts purchased from Iraq, Pakistan, and Serbia).[14] The detailed production engineering data packages of the Kh-55SM/Korshun LACM were bought from Kiev by 2001 which had by then been developed by Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk-based Yuzhnoye State Design Bureau.[20] A 1995 Russian document suggested a complete production facility had been transferred to Shanghai, for the development of a nuclear-armed cruise missile. Originally it was thought that this was based on the 300 km-range Raduga Kh-15 (AS-16 'Kickback'), but it now appears that it was the Kh-55 that was transferred to China.[21]

Jane's Information Group reported the CJ-10 was tested 2004.[18] An August 2012 report by Jane's indicated that a shipborne variance of the missile may have been tested on Bi Sheng, a Chinese weapons trial ship.[22]

The United States in 2008 estimated that 50–250 missiles were in service,[23] increasing to 150–350 in 2009.[24]

Variants

CJ-10
CJ-10K
Air-launched version with a 1500 km range; may be carried by the Xian H-6K.[25]
DF-10A
Ground attack cruise missile.[25] Reportedly a stealthier, more accurate, version of the CJ-10.[14]
"DH-2000"
Supposedly a supersonic version of the DH-10A.[26]
CJ-20
Air-launched version of the CJ-10.[27] Reportedly been tested on the Xian H-6; each bomber may carry four missiles externally.[28]
YJ-100
Anti-ship missile version with an 800 km range, launched by H-6 bomber and Type 055 warship.[1][19]

Operators

 China

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Jeffrey Lin and P.W. Singer, "China Shows Off Its Deadly New Cruise Missiles", Popular Science, 10 March 2015
  2. ^ "PLA's Type 093G submarines 'could destroy Izumo'". wantchinatimes.com. 7 April 2015. Archived from the original on 19 July 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2015. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ http://www.afcea.org/content/?q=china-destroyer-consolidates-innovations-other-ship-advances
  4. ^ a b c d Gormley et. al: p.102
  5. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense: Annual Report To Congress 2015, p.39
  6. ^ "China's new cruise missile programme 'racing ahead'", Jane's Defence Weekly, 2000-01-12, archived from the original on June 4, 2009 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ Kopp, Carlo; Andrew, Martin (27 January 2014). "PLA Cruise Missiles; PLA Air - Surface Missiles". ausairpower.net. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  8. ^ Easton: p.1
  9. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense: Annual Report To Congress 2011, p.2
  10. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense: Annual Report To Congress 2011, p.31
  11. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense: Annual Report To Congress 2012, p.21
  12. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense: Annual Report To Congress 2012, p.42
  13. ^ United States National Air and Space Intelligence Center Public Affairs Office: p.27
  14. ^ a b c Easton: p.3
  15. ^ United States National Air and Space Intelligence Center Public Affairs Office: p.29
  16. ^ DF-10 / CJ-10 / DH-10 surface-to-surface cruise missile - Armyrecognition.com
  17. ^ Glimpse of China’s New Fighter Fuels Rumors - Defensenews.com, 5 August 2012
  18. ^ a b Minnick, Wendell (21 September 2004). "China tests new land-attack cruise missile". Jane's. Archived from the original on 29 September 2004. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  19. ^ a b "China's anti-ship missiles YJ-12 and YJ-100 revealed", China Mail, 4 February 2015
  20. ^ "Hatf-7 Babur GLCM". GlobalSecurity. Retrieved 16 September 2016.
  21. ^ "China's new cruise missile programme 'racing ahead'", Jane's Defence Weekly, 2000-01-12, archived from the original on June 4, 2009 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ Rahmat, Ridzwan (14 October 2014). "PLAN commissions fourth Dahua-class vessel". Jane's. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  23. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense (2008). Annual Report To Congress: Military Power of the People's Republic of China 2008 (PDF) (Report). p. 56. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  24. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense (2009). Annual Report To Congress: Military Power of the People's Republic of China 2009 (PDF) (Report). p. 66. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
  25. ^ a b Fisher, Richard D., Jr. (4 September 2015). "China showcases new weapon systems at 3 September parade". IHS Jane's 360. Retrieved 4 September 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. ^ Easton: p.5
  27. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense: Annual Report To Congress 2015, p.46
  28. ^ Gormley et. al: p.103
  29. ^ United States Office of the Secretary of Defense: Annual Report To Congress 2010, p.31
Bibliography