Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
2,553,283 edits
m Signing comment by Edmondduong - "→https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Roar: new section"
Evanw (talk | contribs)
92 edits
Line 304: Line 304:


{{subst:refund|1= Low Roar |2= The reason why Low Roar was merged with Audrye Sessions was because of insufficient notability back then. However, Low Roar is releasing a third album, and according to Spotify has 185,000+ monthly listeners. I don't see how that is insufficient notability, considering an artist like Azure Ray only has 39,000+ monthly listeners. Low Roar is a separate entity which is gaining a considerable fanbase, while Audrye Sessions is a thing of the past (534 monthly listeners last I checked). Surely, Audrye Sessions should not have their article deleted since they did enjoy a period of notability, but Low Roar should also have their own page since they have reached a sizable amount of followers. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Edmondduong|Edmondduong]] ([[User talk:Edmondduong#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Edmondduong|contribs]]) 18:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{subst:refund|1= Low Roar |2= The reason why Low Roar was merged with Audrye Sessions was because of insufficient notability back then. However, Low Roar is releasing a third album, and according to Spotify has 185,000+ monthly listeners. I don't see how that is insufficient notability, considering an artist like Azure Ray only has 39,000+ monthly listeners. Low Roar is a separate entity which is gaining a considerable fanbase, while Audrye Sessions is a thing of the past (534 monthly listeners last I checked). Surely, Audrye Sessions should not have their article deleted since they did enjoy a period of notability, but Low Roar should also have their own page since they have reached a sizable amount of followers. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Edmondduong|Edmondduong]] ([[User talk:Edmondduong#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Edmondduong|contribs]]) 18:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Defance, Ohio (band) ==

*{{revisions|Defance, Ohio (band)}}
Mthe criteria in 'Wikipedia:Notability (music) Criteria for musicians and ensembles' numbers match up with numbers in notability guide.

1. Defiance, Ohio has three full length albums and an EP released on [[No Idea Records]], an EP on [[Plan-It-X Records]], and [[Anti-Creative Records]] and several other releases on less notable lables. Their only self release was their fist album and demo.

4. They've had several international tours of the USA, Canada, Australia, Europe and Iceland. Here's a few announcements I found on google. https://www.punknews.org/article/48584/tours-defiance-ohio-spoonboy-east-coast

https://www.punknews.org/article/42909/tours-defiance-ohio-nana-grizol-your-heart-breaks-toby-foster
https://www.punknews.org/article/32477/defiance-ohio-new-relese-tour-dates
http://thepunksite.com/news/defiance-ohio-announces-tour-in-support-of-new-full-length/

7. Defiance, Ohio was one of the largest bands in the wave of folk punk in the mid/late 00's and had a large influence in the Bloomington punk scene. —[[User:Evanw|Evanw]] ([[User talk:Evanw|talk]]) 22:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:35, 24 March 2017


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

AZ - Aoun Zia

Ameerkhantareen (talk) 16:41, 19 March 2017 (UTC)I, Ameerkhantareen, request the undeletion of this article AZ - Aoun Zia, i was not able to contest its deletion and still had to edit it to remove the content that seemed promotional. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.[reply]

Nils Bildt

Deleted about 48 hours after PROD tag. I was counting on the standard 7 days. I intended to contest the deletion and remove the PROD tag after gathering some additional references over the weekend. —Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think I phrased that unclearly. I intended to contest and do contest this PROD. I delayed removing the PROD tag only to do so concurrently with checking references I'd already found and editing them in, hoping to avoid going straight to AfD over WP:ONEEVENT. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted this under A7 due to lack of a claim of importance. The text also looked as if it was a criticism of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria Yeates

Article was twice deleted for notability, although an AFD resulted in Speedy Keep. A week later, an administrator User:DragonflySixtyseven appeared to have arbitrarily ignored the outcome of the AFD, decided it lacked notability and deleted it. I'm here because it doesn't seem right to ask for an AFD Review, as the AFD resulted in Speedy Keep. She definitely meets the notability criteria as a star of a hit show who has received sufficient coverage about her life and career. I was just going to create a new article but I think it would be more fair to the original editors to simply restore the deleted article and update with additional sources. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] ——МандичкаYO 😜 01:43, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • There really isn't much to restore, honestly. The only content was "Victoria Yeates is a actress who has been in several shows. She has a following as well with her fans." I suppose it could be restored just to show the person that originally launched the article, but it was in pretty poor condition. You'd be doing so much work on the article that you would essentially be writing it from scratch. There weren't any sources and the only link on there was to the IMDb listing for the actress. I'm going to assume that DragonflySixtyseven didn't see the AfD, but I do think that a search would've provided enough to show that Yeates would have passed speedy criteria at the very least. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 01:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the info @Tokyogirl79:. As long as the original author(s) is in good standing, I'd like to please undelete it out of principle, so their efforts, however small, are not erased. Having valid articles deleted off Wikipedia (especially after a speedy keep AfD!) is the kind of thing that drives good editors away. Thank you! —МандичкаYO 😜 06:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:CSD specifically prohibits this kind of deletion. "If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations and pages that meet specific uncontroversial criteria", which criteria are things like G6, F8, and other stuff that definitely doesn't include A7 or other content-related reasons for deletion. IAR exceptions can arise, of course, but "notability not asserted" isn't an exceptional circumstance that needs IAR. I've undeleted the article. Nyttend (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pradeep Chandran

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Anujanu2010 (talk) 10:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC) In majority of films, Pradeep has shared screen space with actor Mohanlal. He made his television debut through the serial ‘Kunjali Marakkar’. For his acting brilliance, he won the Asianet Television Awards 2011 for Best Debut Actor.[reply]

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. As G4 deletions are tied to deletion debates, they likewise cannot be overturned here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ISS Art

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Olga Rekovskaya (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aishwarya Arjun

I, Catchnaveen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thank you, NaveenKumar N (talk) 18:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ladyboys

We are creating an updated wiki page titled Ladyboys. This page will not violate any of wiki's code of conduct. If the page must be deleted, please allow us to keep the content —Sandysjyoon (talk) 00:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mohamed El Gawady

I, Sunrise2016, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sunrise2016 (talk) 22:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yacoub Shaheen

Deleted because the person who created has been blocked —62.167.197.198 (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Speedy criterion G5, "creations by banned or blocked users", is routinely overused; deleting good content, regardless of the author, is harmful to the encyclopedia. However, most of the edits in this article's history were rev-deleted as copyright infringements, and that alone means that the creator's edits after the revdel are quite suspect. If you're interested in writing a new article about Yacoub Shaheen, let me know and I can provide you with the citations from the deleted page. Nyttend (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg

The author of the media in File:Revolutionary Times 1998.jpg, Loey Glover, sent an email granting permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and {{OTRS pending}} was added to the file description page to prevent premature deletion. —The Hammer of Thor (talk) 05:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In this we await the otrs volunteer to verify what permission is given from whom

. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Minus delta t

we will look into the requested changes and address them —188.118.221.194 (talk) 23:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:FundedHere

I, 118.200.3.79, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 118.200.3.79 (talk) 00:37, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Content has not yet been finalized, we would like to keep this draft page for future use —118.200.3.79 (talk) 00:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Drafts are not just supposed to be kept. I restored this before and no one improved the page. When you are ready to edit it, plese ask. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SaveTheInternet.in

The article was deleted after insufficient participation in AfD citing notability. There were enough news articles, scholarly references about the website, which was at the forefront of campaign for Net neutrality in India and is key website to have shaped public policy through mass participation in India. Requesting undeletion to improve. — Srikanth (Logic) 12:35, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This page is not for challenging AFD results. If you disagree with User:Kurykh's close you should ask that user about it. Otherwise the venue is WP:DRV to try to overturn AFD results. In any case there is nothing to restore here, as the content is linked From https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SaveTheInternet.in&action=history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cole Whittle

I, Malecken, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Malecken (talk) 14:11, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rajiv Kathpalia

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —27.5.52.157 (talk) 16:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajiv Kathpalia, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TPM Inc

Hello, I am having trouble understanding the exact reason why this page was tagged for deletion and eventually deleted even after I edited the text. I do not work at this company, have carefully researched Wikipedia posting rules before doing it, and I truly don't think the text was promotional. I had included only 1 link to the website of the company (the link led to homepage and was in infobox and external links, no link in text), but would still remove it without an issue if that was the reason. I had also researched similar topics on Wikipedia and tried to keep the style consistent to them. Moreover, I have specifically refrained myself from taking ANY kind of information from the company website or blog. All of the information I included, without exceptions, were sourced from external sources, not related to the company. So, apart from the default paragraphs of the possible reasons why the page was deleted, can you please indicate the exact parts of the text that looked promotional to you or the exact reasons why the page didn't deserve to be saved. Please understand where I come from, at this point I still don't understand how I could have possibly improved the text and it is hard to progress and make other edits/create other pages not knowing why the previous one got deleted. I would really appreciate the help, thank you. Poster11 (talk) 21:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The deletion clearly states it and it followed our main policy WP:What Wikipedia is not, however, I will note that anything still suggestive of a business profile will be deleted; focusing only with the basics and also major independent news is what helps in articles here. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • As I recall the article was for a local chain of print shops. The article relied heavily on claims of WP:INHERITed notability from its client base rather than any claims of notability of its own. To be fair, the first admin to respond declined the CSD. It was only because Poster11 restored the CSD that the article was in consideration for deletion. If the article is restored, and there are no verifiable claims of notability I will take it to AfD. Cabayi (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The reason it looked promotional was the use of marketing style words, such as prestigeous, exclusive, awards, expertise, recognized. If you didn't retore the delete tags yourself it mya have survived till this day. The way ahead is to ask User talk:Deb to restore it for you. You can tell her that you added the delete tags by mistake. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hey everyone, I want to say thank you for all of you replying, this really did clear up things for me. I don't think I will ask to restore the tag, I might just rework the information, make the necessary fixes, and then maybe try again. With these comments, I don't think the previous text will work even if I edit it. Thank you again. Poster11 (talk) 13:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Songs from the Heart Tour

I was working on it and YOU DELETEd it while I was working on it. It meets notability because it has sources and all the stuff. Please unblock it so I can finish it —PantherMan (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Igor Kozlovskyy

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Moroshka67 (talk) 22:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uncle Don's Toys

Enter The page was deleted due to claims on no existence of notability, where there is some. —Robbyiscrazy (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi

this is page about a prominent singer of India. He has released more than 15 pop and devotional album under various companies like T-Series, Venus etc. —Iconicmj11 (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note this request was made by a block-evading sockpuppet account. --Yamla (talk) 15:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Wi-SUN

I, Rbienert, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rbienert (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to continue editing the article to address the comments —Rbienert (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"We"? Are you confessing to a shared account? Cabayi (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If someone else wants to contribute to the article, they must register their own account. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr._Crawford

I put in the necessary criteria for each of the things and every time the pot would mark it again, I would add more in. I don't see the reason why it was deleted. —Schwiiz (talk) 20:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sex in the Title

I, Nitareeny, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nitareeny (talk) 03:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

would like to continue to work on it and then click the "Save page" button below —Nitareeny (talk) 03:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charanjeet Singh Sondhi

actually thispage is about a singer who has released many albums from various big companies like T-Series, venus —2405:204:E18A:516E:0:0:D14:38AC (talk) 04:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Carrington

This author has new books about to be published in Cambridge University Press's Cambridge Reading Adventures, a worldwide reading scheme , and he has produced a series on social skills for autistic-spectrum students for LDA Learning. http://www.ldalearning.com/products.aspx?search=1&style=0&kw=robot

Template:Jim Carrington The subject has further forthcoming titles in the CUP worldwide reading scheme Cambridge Reading Adventures. Leading special educational publisher LDA has commissioned a series of social skills books from Jim Carrington for use with autistic-spectrum students. http://www.ldalearning.com/products.aspx?search=1&style=0&kw=robot

ZEBRONICS

User@Exemplo347 has made mutiple edits in page and also caused the deletion by appealing for speedy deletion under act G11. Also the article has no intend of promotion nor any other, also there is no proof for spamming activity.

Not done and will not be done. It was clearly promotional, with numerous links to product pages and citations to public-relations press releases. DO NOT attempt to bypass the community process here by re-creating the article under alternative names. If you feel the article was improperly deleted, take it up with the deleting administrator, and if they decline to restore, take your case to WP:DRV. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Templeton University

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Edmund777 (talk) 12:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NOMBREX

I, G8gon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. G8gon (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thoth: Software for Data Visualization and Statistics

Please restore the page as I intend to edit it and make it encyclopedic. —CorniceBowlSkier (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Start over. In draft space, or in your sandbox, and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Queen Cora

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Cgspeed1 (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cgspeed1: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for undelection of Victor Ike

Hello, I've been trying to send a message to Northamerica1000, but when i click on "Talk back" or {{You've got mail}} on his page, it directs me to a different page. I wrote here some weeks ago, about the delection of Victor Ike Article and did'nt get no response, which i think was'nt faire. I also wrote to John of Reading & Κσυπ Cyp about the delection of the article i'm still working on and they told me that it was Northamerica1000 that delected it. Please can you explain your deletion of that article "Victor Ike"? It was a soft redirect and was created using the appropriate template for such. I'm still working on it and It did not qualify for a speedy or any other deletion since we having pages like that is very normal. I would appreciate if you can restore it. Best Regards, Tracy

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victor Ike, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Did you read the deletion discussion?
Just write a note on the administrator's talk page, without trying to use templates. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Smith

the article was fully referenced. As the deleting admin noted, the author is an author of some notable works and therefore is notable by connection to those works. That the author doesn't seek publicity personally shouldn't detract from the notability of their works and their author. —— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanseng (talk • contribs) 16:51, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sanseng: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.
...and, proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Smith. An author doesn't become notable by virtue of having written some books that got some publicity. See WP:NAUTHOR and WP:NOTINHERITED. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Barbara Devlin

I, Caliki, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Caliki (talk) 20:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Caliki: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rubrik

The content (including recognitions) was all well-cited, as was mentioned by others who reviewed it. So, it's inaccurate to claim it was a promotional page. In addition, there are many startups listed on Wikipedia, many of which are lesser-known than Rubrik. —LaLoo (talk) 20:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubrik, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Hut 8.5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James MacDonald ‎

I want to continue editing it for publishing. I took some time away and I didn't realize there was a timeline. Thank you —TeepTeep (talk) 21:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Women’s League for Conservative Judaism (

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 108.24.148.165 (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Matt Tarrant

I, 114.198.126.142, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 114.198.126.142 (talk) 03:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aileen Cassinetto

Accidentally deleted —Ugatdos (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Roar

{{subst:refund|1= Low Roar |2= The reason why Low Roar was merged with Audrye Sessions was because of insufficient notability back then. However, Low Roar is releasing a third album, and according to Spotify has 185,000+ monthly listeners. I don't see how that is insufficient notability, considering an artist like Azure Ray only has 39,000+ monthly listeners. Low Roar is a separate entity which is gaining a considerable fanbase, while Audrye Sessions is a thing of the past (534 monthly listeners last I checked). Surely, Audrye Sessions should not have their article deleted since they did enjoy a period of notability, but Low Roar should also have their own page since they have reached a sizable amount of followers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edmondduong (talk • contribs) 18:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defance, Ohio (band)

Mthe criteria in 'Wikipedia:Notability (music) Criteria for musicians and ensembles' numbers match up with numbers in notability guide.

1. Defiance, Ohio has three full length albums and an EP released on No Idea Records, an EP on Plan-It-X Records, and Anti-Creative Records and several other releases on less notable lables. Their only self release was their fist album and demo.

4. They've had several international tours of the USA, Canada, Australia, Europe and Iceland. Here's a few announcements I found on google. https://www.punknews.org/article/48584/tours-defiance-ohio-spoonboy-east-coast

https://www.punknews.org/article/42909/tours-defiance-ohio-nana-grizol-your-heart-breaks-toby-foster https://www.punknews.org/article/32477/defiance-ohio-new-relese-tour-dates http://thepunksite.com/news/defiance-ohio-announces-tour-in-support-of-new-full-length/

7. Defiance, Ohio was one of the largest bands in the wave of folk punk in the mid/late 00's and had a large influence in the Bloomington punk scene. —Evanw (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=772031372"