Jump to content

User talk:Oshwah: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has CheckUser privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
This user has oversight privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has interface administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted 1 edit by Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt) (talk): Shouldn’t be. (TW)
Line 620: Line 620:


Oshwah you disappoint me, when you first blocked me or reported me. I thought oh it's fine one time only but sooner or later you blocked me again because of your fake reasons of vandalism. Sometime later on the Fujiwara clan page, I put real information like the year that the Fujiwara clan was founded but after that you or Kintetsu Buffalo reported me and blocked me and gave me one more chance before I was blocked from editing because of your vandalism 'reasons' or nonsense facts but here's one thing, i have the group to take you down and you don't wanna know what that group is. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:404NotDiscovered|404NotDiscovered]] ([[User talk:404NotDiscovered#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/404NotDiscovered|contribs]]) 09:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Oshwah you disappoint me, when you first blocked me or reported me. I thought oh it's fine one time only but sooner or later you blocked me again because of your fake reasons of vandalism. Sometime later on the Fujiwara clan page, I put real information like the year that the Fujiwara clan was founded but after that you or Kintetsu Buffalo reported me and blocked me and gave me one more chance before I was blocked from editing because of your vandalism 'reasons' or nonsense facts but here's one thing, i have the group to take you down and you don't wanna know what that group is. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:404NotDiscovered|404NotDiscovered]] ([[User talk:404NotDiscovered#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/404NotDiscovered|contribs]]) 09:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Who’s your sockmaster ~ [[User:Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt)|<span style="background:#008000; color:white; padding:2px;">'''Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt)'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt)|talk to me]]) 09:07, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:08, 20 July 2018



Let's chat


Click here to message me. I will reply as soon as I can. All replies will be made directly underneath your message on this page.

Please create your message with a subject/headline and sign your message using four tildes (~~~~) at the end.


Experienced editors have my permission to talk page stalk and respond to any message or contribute to any thread here.


Shon Hopwood

You just reverted my added content on the Shon Hopwood article due to lack of sourcing. I tried to add the 60 minutes link as a source, but my phone rebelled, and I'm not smart enough digitally to figure it out. The info I added is worthwhile and appropriate. Can you pick it up for me? I can't even link the 60 Minutes thing here. That, too, got rejected. But I really hope you add it. That info belongs in the article. Vcuttolo (talk) 23:53, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vcuttolo - Ahhh I see... you were trying to cite the interview itself from YouTube here. It's possible that you're having a hard time linking this video because of the copyright permissions set by the video's owner. Make sure that you take extreme caution and make sure that you verify the copyright status of the media and if using it here is allowed... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. You really are one of the good guys! We need more like you, really. My failed link was from the CBS transcript on the web, which contained a link to the 60 Minutes video. Google "60 Minutes Shon Hopwood" and it pops right up. But I can't even bring it here. Vcuttolo (talk) 00:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Vcuttolo - No problem :-), and I apologize for the weird way that the warning was left. Not sure what happened. You may have to wait until you're on a desktop or different device before you can add the link. I know that mobile can occasionally have it's "dark sides" with specific things like this. Just remember that you need to verify the copyright permissions of that video before you add it as a reference here. I'm not an expert with copyrights, but it definitely is something Wikipedia takes seriously and that can get us in trouble if we violate them. See Wikipedia's guide on copyights for help with how to do this. If you need anything, let me know and I'll be happy to help you further. Cheers ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vcuttolo: Are you looking at this link? It requires a subscription to view, but likely is acceptable for citation per WP:COPYLINK, since it's posted by the copyright holder. However, it looks like that video has also been uploaded to other sites that don't require subscription, and those videos probably violate copyright. Linking to those videos (even though they seem "free") would be contributory infringement, and so linking to those other videos on Vimeo or Youtube would likely not be permissible. Not sure if the link I provided was the one you were looking at, so I'll just leave it here for you. Hope this helps.
P.S. User:Oshwah- Just got started on Huggle and I've been learning at lot from watching you work. Thanks for your great work. --Policy Reformer(c) 01:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
PolicyReformer - Cool man! Let me know if you have questions about Huggle or need help with anything, and I'll be happy to do so :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the link was a different one. The one provided here goes directly to the pay-restricted video. My failed attempt at a source went to a very similar-looking CBS site, but it was a full transcript of the 60 Minutes segment, with a link to the protected video. Vcuttolo (talk) 01:29, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Vcuttolo: I think I found it. Does this look right? --Policy Reformer(c) 01:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is exactly it. Thank you for taking care of it! If only every Wikipedia editor was like you two guys... Vcuttolo (talk) 01:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You bet; always happy to help ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vcuttolo (talk • contribs) 00:08, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vcuttolo - I'm honestly not sure why you were left a final warning instead of with a typical one that simply asks you to cite your sources - please accept my apologies for that. What video are we talking about exactly? I don't remember reverting any kind of video, just an addition of text that didn't reference any sources was all, and that's way to fix ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:38, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just writing here because we're on two different threads (wrong term, pbly) simultaneously: Thank you for clearing that all up. We need more good guys like you around here. Vcuttolo (talk) 01:26, 9 July 2018 (UTC) I just deleted my lead comment here, because I didn't want to leave any negativity on your page. Thank you again. Vcuttolo (talk) 01:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Air & Sea Show

In my humble opinion, the Air & Sea Show should not have been merged with the Fort Lauderdale Air Show. They're two separate entities now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex414 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help

talk

help

Can you assist me with editing the GRTC The Pulse article? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRTC_Pulse).
Richmond VA recently installed a public transportation system called The Pulse.

Half the maps are backward. I have contacted my District Representative, City Council, GRTC, the media, etc etc etc.

No one appears to care.

But I have travelled around the world and am positive that -- for millennia -- public transit authorities follow an east/west, north/south map orientation. Richmond eschews this and appears to construe maps as art.

I placed a warning for Wikipedia users who are traveling that the maps are backwards.

You removed this information because . . . I can't figure that out.

Please help me figure out how to let people know they cannot trust the maps that comprise the entire back wall of the bus stops without offending you.

Thank you Viochita

Viochita (talk) 04:32, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Viochita - Do you still need help with this article? Let me know. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at this new user - unregistered active user

Hi,

Can you watch out of this user [CoolRichWiseGuy]. He has been vandalized in a "good way" putting useless contents into many articles. Thanks - --Jay (talk) 04:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whjayg - Sorry I missed responding to your message here. Sure, I'll do my best. If you see any issues or problems that I need to look into, let me know and I'll be happy to do so. Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Someone has brought up in Admin notice board about the user on 11 July. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:CoolRichWiseGuy] - Jay (talk) 16:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Whjayg - Ah, perfect. Thanks for the update and for letting me know :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 16:06, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can't log in

Hi Oshwah, it's PM here. I'm having some trouble logging into my account and I was hoping that you could help me please.

A few weeks ago, I got a notification that someone had tried to log into my account. As it turns out, I was not alone; hundreds, if not thousands of other editors had been similarly affected. I changed my password as a precaution and thought nothing more of it until today when I upgraded my mobile phone. I edit (almost) exclusively from a mobile as I do not have a permanent internet connection in my home. I went to log into Wikipedia on my new phone and found that I could not remember my password. I went into password recovery and entered my e-mail address only to get a notification that there was no e-mail registered for my account. I tried my other e-mail address—I only have two—and got the same message. Now I'm logged out of all devices on Wikipedia and cannot get back in. What would be the best thing for me to do? 1.129.109.178 (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) In general, if you cannot remember your password and have no email set, you are SOL. However, one option is to contact a checkuser (I recommend Bbb23) with your account name (it's not User:Pm who hasn't edited in five years). If they can confirm your IP has been used by you and only you recently, and other technical data matches, they may be able to advise further. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mia Wasikowska

Hi. @Saradoll: has made, and probably will continue to make persistent disruptive editings on this article. I request for protection. Sebastian James (talk)

Thanks

Hi - thanks for your kind message/barnstar; happy to step in and help. I too was watching that page and decided I had to reference the news in line with policy; good to see you also were also keeping track of that editing overload! Happy to help out when needed! Lord Sidious 82 (talk) 16:45, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skrunda Post 2

Hey man,

Found a source on another Skrunda part of the wikipedia

https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/latvija/skrundas-armijas-pilsetinu-pasvaldiba-piekrit-nodot-aizsardzibas-ministrijai.a193821/

If i am feeling like it ill edit it, or someone else can it.

Hehe, cheers and have a good day.

Stefano

You've got mail

Hello, Oshwah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Received and replied. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Oshwah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Received and replied to your email. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

committed identity

Is one form or no form of contact enough?Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Thegooduser - At least one should be good. SQLQuery me! 23:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
SQL is correct - use at least one form of committed identity to keep yourself safe just in case ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

wow

He's talking about me, I think.
He may in fact, be doing just that.

you have enormous hair and you look like a fun guy. well done49.199.144.142 (talk) 12:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. Enigmamsg 00:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That is hilarious! ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:34, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About the ravens home

Hi I got an e-mail from you saying I deleted something relate to raven's home or something I think you message the wrong person because I never that show existed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.223.6.41 (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for the message. If you're using an internet connection or network connection that is shared with other people, it's possible for you to receive warnings and notices regarding edits that you did not make. Creating and using an account will resolve this problem. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sniping IPs in edit war

Oshwah (or an admin stalker), could you take a look at the recent IP edits on Mitsubishi X-2 Shinshin? I'm not sure what all is going on here, but they are starting to get personal calling each other out I'm not sure if semi-protection is warranted or not, but any help in solving this issue would be much appreciated. Thanks. - BilCat (talk)

Hi BilCat! It's good to talk to you once again :-). Looks like this was a dispute between one IP and others that have since stopped. If this continues there, let me know and I'll be happy to take another look. I hope you're having a great day, and I'm sure we'll run into each other again soon ;-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks. You have a great day also. - BilCat (talk) 00:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Account Issue

Hello Oshwah! I just want to inform you that someone made an account named Ks0stwah, which is supposedly a shared account between you and Ks0stm. This account is most definitely not legitimate. Funplussmart (talk) 14:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: Ks0stwah has just been blocked. Funplussmart (talk) 14:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Funplussmart - Thanks for leaving me a message and for letting me know. Definitely a troll account ;-). If you see any more accounts like these, don't hesitate to report them to AIV or ANI so they can be quickly handled, or let me know. Thanks again! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:50, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018


Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our content policies, conduct policies, deletion policies, enforcement policies, legal policies, procedural policies, behavioral guidelines, content guidelines, deletion guidelines, editing guidelines, naming conventions, notability guidelines, style guidelines, frequently asked questions, information pages and help pages, such as WP:A, WP:B, WP:C, WP:D, WP:E, WP:F, WP:G, WP:H, WP:I, WP:K, WP:L, WP:M, WP:N, WP:O, WP:P, WP:Q, WP:R, WP:S, WP:T, WP:U, WP:V, WP:W, WP:Y, WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR, WP:MTAU, WP:STUB, WP:SS, WP:CLN, WP:FRNG, WP:CG, WP:ADS, WP:PD, WP:SW, WP:NGS, and WP:MOS, including the following very important points:

However, please note that, per WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:FORUM, WP:PLUG, WP:PROMO, WP:LINKFARM, WP:NOTCV, WP:YELLOW (not to be confused with WP:RED or WP:BLUE, and especially not WP:GREEN, also see MOS:COLOR), WP:GAMEGUIDE, WP:FUTURE, WP:DIARY, WP:IINFO, WP:CENSOR, WP:CHAOS, WP:DEM, WP:BURO, WP:LAB, WP:FACTIONS, WP:REQUIRED and WP:BADIDEA, Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia, not a dictionary, not a publisher of original thought, not a soapbox or means of promotion, not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files, not a blog, web hosting service, social networking service, or memorial site, not a directory, not a manual, guidebook, textbook, or scientific journal, not a crystal ball, not a newspaper, not an indiscriminate collection of information, not censored, not an anarchy or forum for free speech, not a democracy, not a bureaucracy, not a laboratory, not a battleground, and not compulsory.

You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. In any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Thank you for reading; now please ignore everything written above.

~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abelmoschus Esculentus - What the... ? LOL ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:00, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This warning template is everything you need XD credits:ToBeFree ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Oshwah Please stop your Disruptive Editing otherwise Your admin rights will be taken away and be given to me. LoL.Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For those of you who are wondering I am just kidding.Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Umm...

I guess Kulbhushan Yadav was a bad protection.Firstly, there was no need to sysop-protect hours after the edit-war and it's a case of bad choice between a block and a protection(shall something be at all necessary, (I don't think any administrative action was deserved)......).A newly-registered account vs me, Anachronist, SamSailor and Kautilya3.....

Please un-protect and see NeilN's note at my and his t/p, which perfectly handled the situation.Regards,∯WBGconverse 03:25, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Winged Blades of Godric - Checking... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Winged Blades of Godric - Ah, okay... I see what went on... thanks for leaving me a message about this and for having me take another look. I agree that the article didn't need protection - unprotecting it now :-). ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:37, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Winged Blades of Godric -  Done. Thanks again :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

What type of sourcing does Wikipedia like? Chicago/Turabian? How do we cite web-based content? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:548:C100:BA4C:4925:6BCE:2C29:8EAE (talk) 03:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) See WP:CITE. General Ization Talk 03:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Hi there, and thanks for leaving me a message here with your questions. Wikipedia has two guide pages that will help you with exactly what you're asking about. The first guide will help you to identify reliable sources, which are the sources Wikipedia prefers over others on articles. Finding sources that are reliable is a task that is just as important as how you actually cite them with your edits, so make sure that you read through this guide page and verify that you understand it. Wikipedia also has a guide to help you with citing sources in-line with the content you're trying to add or modify. In a nutshell, you'll add <ref></ref> tags on each side of what you are going to cite in-line as a reference and you'll do this next to the content you're adding to the article. You'll also want to read this section (as an example) where you can use a template inside of the ref tags to have the information that should be included in a reference formatted for you - this template formats a reference that is a web page. I went ahead and created example of how to add a reference for you below:
Example of adding a reference
<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.example.com/example_page|title="Example reference page title"|publisher=Example Publisher (name of company or site)|last=Last name of the publisher of reference|first=First name of the publisher of reference|date=Jan 1, 2005|accessdate=May 1, 2018}}</ref>
Again, you'll want to refer to that guideline page for the information you're looking for, but in a nutshell - it's not too bad. Let me know if you have any questions after reading through the page I linked you to above, and I'll be happy to answer them. I wish you a great rest of your day and happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:00, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Trasevensee

Block with reason WP:NOTHERE? ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 04:25, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abelmoschus Esculentus - Oh man... this user looks like he's not sure of what he's doing at all... I'd say before we jump straight to any kind of block, lets assume that he's just lost and needs help and offer some help to the user. Try leaving a message on his user talk page and asking what the user's intentions are, if they need help with anything, etc. as well as point them to the new user tutorial so they can go through it. Their response (or lack of one) might help us figure out what the user is trying to do. Otherwise, if the account just goes stale (as most like this one do) then no need to block (obviously), but I think that going as far as to say that the user is WP:NOTHERE is too soon - especially when we're not sure of the user's intentions :-). Keep me updated and let me know what happens ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your advice Oshwah. I’ve welcomed the user, hopefully (s)he will edit constructively in the future. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 04:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abelmoschus Esculentus - No problem; always happy to help ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 04:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked editor who you blocked

Hi there Oshwah, I just wanted to let you know that I have unblocked User:Officialjesperkyd as they have been OTRS verified. Just giving you a heads up. --TheSandDoctor Talk 05:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TheSandDoctor - Great, thanks for letting me know :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome . --TheSandDoctor Talk 05:56, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent removal of content on the "Regular Polytope" article

Hello, I recently removed the paragraph in this article that was talking about how the universe could be a regular polytope. It was implicitly talking about Poincare dodecahedral space, which is obtained by taking the faces of a regular dodecahedron, twisting one of each pair of opposite faces by 36 degrees and gluing them together; the result is clearly not a regular polytope. The paragraph doesn't mention any other sort of cosmological model that fits what it is saying. It also uses what I would consider very informal language: it uses the term "higher polytope" to mean "higher dimensional polytope," even though the dodecahedron is three dimensional, it also, for no apparent reason, brings up the fact that string theories have more than 4 dimensions. This, as well as the fact that, according to https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01593, the universe doesn't appear to have non-trivial topology, make the entire paragraph justifiable only as pure speculation. It seems as though it was written to enthrall the reader rather than inform them. I meant to mention all this when I edited the section, but I accidentally did not because I very rarely edit articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:1303:417D:1C88:8A1A:EFD4:9CD4 (talk) 05:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thanks for leaving me a message and for explaining the reason behind the content removal you performed. The main reason that I was concerned was that you didn't explain this removal using the edit summary. You'll want to do this with the edits you make, as edit summaries help other editors to see and understand what you're doing and the reason why. You're welcome to go back and remove the content if you believe that it's inaccurate - just make sure and use the edit summary to explain. If you have any more questions or concerns, please let me know and I'll be happy to help you further. Thanks again for leaving me a message and for explaining your edit. I hope you have a great day and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Please check your email inbox. Thanks. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 06:25, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abelmoschus Esculentus - Received and replied :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

did not Vandalize page

I was trying to make the page better not Vandalize it. Don't be so quick to judge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mario Bros Plumbing (talk • contribs) 07:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

43.247.42.49

43.247.42.49 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)

I saw that you rev-del'd this IPs other edits recently; could you rev-del this one as well? Thanks. 90.101.62.63 (talk) 07:16, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And again, [1]. Probably time to block the IP. 90.101.62.63 (talk) 07:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I agree -  Done. Thanks for the messages and for the heads up. Let me know if you run into any more disruption and I'll be happy to take a look. Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Hutchinson

Thank you for your intervention on Anne Hutchinson; as one of the the protagonists in the dispute, might I invite you to revert to the last version by my antagonist Dilidor which is an improvement on the last reversion by the deus ex machina Mr. Guye (while, of course, also updating the recently corrected external link).

Also John Cotton (minister) is even more in need of pp-dispute intervention. Thank you. Nedrutland (talk) 07:29, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nedrutland! Thanks for the message and for the kind words. I'm glad that the protection put an end to the disruption and I hope that it encourages everyone involved to resolve the dispute properly on the article's talk page. Unfortunately, as the protecting admin, I cannot revert the article to a different revision unless the current revision is violating a Wikipedia policy such as copyright, BLP, or another serious policy. Otherwise, I'd be playing favorites and choosing a side by choosing a "preferred revision" over another which is against Wikipedia's protection policy. It would also compromise my actions here as they would be seen as non-neutral, which is definitely not something that I want to have happen. Make sure to participate in the discussions on the article's talk page and help the dispute come to a positive consensus. If there are edits that everyone agrees need to be made to the article while it's protected, just make an edit request and have the other users involved add their endorsement and the edit will be handled no problem. If you have any more questions or concerns, don't hesitate to let me know and I'll be happy to help. Thanks again for the message, and I hope the dispute comes to a positive and fair close :-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:40, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As I had previously commented on the Talk page, by reverting to an ancient version, Mr. Guye was favouring one side - the one that is unwilling to see any changes. Oh well.
And John Cotton (minister)? Nedrutland (talk) 07:50, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nedrutland - Woah, be careful there... what's with all the reverts between you two? Looking through the recent edit history on that article, an admin would've definitely blocked the both of you for edit warring and violating 3RR had someone seen this during the time that it was going on (i.e. July 10, July 9, July 6, July 5...) - I highly recommend that you stop making any more reverts to the article and that you start a talk page discussion and ping the other user there if you haven't already. I'm going to hold off on protecting the article for now, as the previous edit warring on July 10 has stopped and I'm hoping that it won't continue. You definitely got off lucky by not getting blocked for these past edit wars... I'd take this response as a "wake up call" and I wouldn't push your luck there any further. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You will see there is a Talk discussion but it has not been very fruitful as few specific objections are made (except some examples of things he does not think need linking, mostly which I have for now in a pacific spirit de-linked). In ten years or so on here, I have never been involved in any dispute like it but any edit no matter how uncontroversial (removing redundant parameter from the infobox, for example) is automatically reverted. Nedrutland (talk) 08:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nedrutland - That's good that you started a talk page discussion (I just finished skimming through it). What I would do is ask for input from other involved editors on this page so that it doesn't stay at this "I'm right, you're wrong" back-and-fourth argument between the two of you. This way, more input is provided and by uninvolved editors, and a consensus is more likely to be reached due to other editors discussing this as well. This will definitely be a big help :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:24, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the suggestion. I have looked back through five years of edits but precious few editors seem to have been properly involved in improving it; nevertheless I have pinged a few (including you, of course). Nedrutland (talk) 09:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nedrutland - You bet :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Are you ok?

RE: Justin Trudeau

Are you ok? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Don.tusk (talk • contribs) 10:10, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

removal of protection on dawood ibrahim

hi,

i request that you please remove the protection on the article about Dawood Ibrahim as it is currently unwarranted. discussions are presently taking place about the article (which i invite you to take a look at) and the so-called "persistent disruptive editing" is false and i believe to be a deliberate attempt to escape confrontation about their illegal reverts to valid edits. i would like to bring to your attention how this user has been involved in conflicts with senior users about this supposed technique by which this user allegedly uses multiple IPs themselves to put on a facade of "persistent disruptive editing" and afterward ask for protection of those wikipedia pages in order to protect their own edits. this type of arrogant, shady behaviour is what limits the growth of wikipedia.

again, i recommend you look into the discussion (here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dawood_Ibrahim#POV_in_lead) so you better understand that there was no such "persistent disruptive editing", rather it is this user who persistently disrupts edits by constantly reverting edits that do not suit their own beliefs and agenda.

thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gangadesh721 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gangadesh721 - The article is only protected with pending changes protection; it doesn't restrict anyone from editing the article. All it does is require edits that are made by anonymous users or non-confirmed accounts to be reviewed and approved before that revision of the page becomes available to the public to read. You should be able to edit the article as you normally would. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for your response. i am aware of the type of protection and the safeguards against vandalism it entails but i have reservations about the neutrality of the review process especially if it is being reviewed by people with biases regarding the article at hand. for some people, discussion regarding Dawood Ibrahim is a contentious and polarising topic and would appreciate if it was not necessary to delve deeper into that in order to make simple edits. If you still think that the article should stay protected, are there any assurances you can provide that the review process of edits will be neutral?
thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gangadesh721 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Gangadesh721 - Only approved users with the pending changes reviewer rights are able to review and approve or decline pending changes to pages or articles. These are users who are granted the rights only after demonstrating a consistent and proficient editing history that shows that they have the knowledge, experience, and ability to use the tools correctly and in compliance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Since your account is autoconfirmed, none of the edits you make will be required to be reviewed first. However, if your concerns are in regards to the edits made by others who are anonymous or not yet confirmed, I don't believe that they'll have any problems with having their edits approved so long as they are in compliance with Wikipedia's policies. Please let me know if you have any more questions or concerns and I'll be happy to help you further. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
alright, thank you very much for your kind help :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gangadesh721 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No problem :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

I removed it because he his no longer a judge at The Voice, he used to be he has been replaced by Yemi Alade.maybe i should have added the replacement rather than remove. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fretlesssss (talk • contribs) 13:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fretlesssss, and thanks for leaving me a message here and for explaining your edit to 2Baba. You are correct - generally, it's better to replace something (remove and add) in the same edit rather than over two different edits. You're of course not required to do this at all - it just makes the editing history easier to read by other editors is all. You'll also want to explain each of your edits using the edit summary so that other editors will be able to see and understand what you're doing and why. If you do these two things, you'll run into less confusion and less "bumps" with other editors. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to let me know and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks again for the message and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

English

Wht is the lack soil Pls give information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:5026:1D5D:0:0:1024:30A4 (talk) 16:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what your edit was trying to say, nor what you're trying to ask here? ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This is Anonymous IP name is User talk:124.106.134.164 has been bullying me and personal attacks on User:LG-Gunther and Got this block on Anonymous IP is 124.106.134.164 and Disable talk page again, help LG-Gunther :  Talk  21:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LG-Gunther - Alright, thanks for letting me know. I'll dig deeper and investigate for you. I just didn't see any personal attacks on your user talk page just a bit ago; it looks like I need to look deeper and further back. I've asked him to leave your talk page alone; you should also leave his alone and don't restore content he removes. If things continue, please let me know and I'll be happy to take a look and put a stop to it. Thanks again for the message; I'll make sure that the harassment stops one way or another... fear not ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:44, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oshwah, I have made a 3RR report against the above editor. I should put the notice on his talk page, but as per your request I would rather not. Could you put the 3RR report template on his page so that I don't have to?

Also claims of bullying are just silly. My edit history is not long, you can check every single edit and summary that I have made and you will see that I have not harassed anyone. I made a couple of silly edits because my sources were not good. Now I have this person thinking he can control which messages I keep on my page. Thanks. 124.106.134.164 (talk) 21:52, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. It looks like you've already left the 3RR notice template on LG-Gunther's user talk page and he removed it afterwards. The template doesn't have to stay there; it just has to be left there to notify him. Since he removed the template, he's obviously aware of the report - no need to press it any further on him. There obviously seems to be tension between the two of you - I'd suggest giving him some space and leaving well enough alone if it can be helped. This way, you two don't keep clashing over and over where frustrations and anger can continue to grow. I hope things work out between you both and that you two try and talk things out peacefully and move on... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:00, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Check your talk page history, he's deleting my comments from here. He's also deleted the 3RR report from ani 3rr twice. 124.106.134.164 (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just messaged him to stop and helped him to understand why. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No subject

I removed that bit of information because I felt like it was unnecessary and did not any contribution to the page. I'm sorry for any inconvenience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Revivaloutsold (talk • contribs) 21:54, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Revivaloutsold! No worries, and thanks for leaving me a message and for explaining. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:15, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Am I missing something?

"it'll just be closed and a WP:BOOMERANG is imposed."

Why exactly would a boomerang be imposed? I'm having my talk page edit warred on. I'm making a 3RR report and someone deletes it. I'm having someone remove my comments from your talk page. I've done NOTHING to this guy - but I'm getting a boomerang? Any reason why? 124.106.134.164 (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a hypothetical situation that I was explaining. I was telling him that, "hey look... don't keep reverting 124.106.134.164... let him file that AN3 report. If you've done nothing wrong and you believe the report is an attempt to troll or harass, it'll be closed and 124.106.134.164 will be blocked..." I wasn't actually telling him that this was what was going to happen... Hope that makes sense. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. I didn't see grounds for any sanctions against me, but it seemed as if they were implied. Also, he just removed more content from my talk page. Just for deleting the 3RR report he deserves sanctions. This is a clear cut deserved editing block. 124.106.134.164 (talk) 22:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He's trying to apologize - let's at least try and give him the benefit of the doubt... I've added a comment to his apology, and asked him to lay off of you for a bit. Do the same for him, and you two will be able to cool off and not continue to butt heads :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Patience is a virtue and all that jazz. Too much drama over mere silliness. 124.106.134.164 (talk) 22:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is. Thank you for your patience and working with me to help diffuse the situation... I'm sorry that this situation came about and that you were left annoyed with the repeated reverts and accusations... Hopefully he'll continue to leave you alone (and vice versa of course) and there won't be any problems. Happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User Page Image

Hi Oshwah! I have been working on my user page and am having trouble uploading an image. It continuously tells me that something went wrong and that the image has to be my own, despite the fact that I own the image. Do you have any tips for uploading images successfully? EnricoCaruso3 (talk) 23:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello again

hi there Oshwah, thanks for apologized again and, hey do you have deleted and remove this contributions again. thanks LG-Gunther :  Talk  23:36, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dozier

Scott Dozier has 1 daughter and 1 son. 208.102.182.81 (talk) 00:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Sorry about the edit, how did you find it so quickly? 2600:8803:7C80:289:EDDF:501:AB65:AE05 (talk) 01:49, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! No worries about the edit - we were all new here once and this is how we learn and gain experience; no need to be sorry or feel bad. One of my daily tasks is to patrol the edit logs and recent changes and look for issues such as vandalism, harassment, edit warring, and other problems - and fix those issues as well as talk to the users involved. If you have any more questions, please don't hesitate to ask and I'll be happy to answer them. Thanks for the message and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you ♥

thank you for 1st barnstar! I have been doing what I can. I appreciate it very much. Gilded Snail (talk) 01:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, Gilded Snail! You're doing well and you deserve it! Keep up the good work, and let me know if I can help in any way. Cheers :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reversions

You're getting all of the good vandals! No fair! RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 02:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RandNetter96 - LOL. Don't worry, there's plenty to go around :-P ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:44, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @RandNetter96: The world is unfair. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Please check this out if you have time. Thanks. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can test it out yourself too :) ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abelmoschus Esculentus - Awesome! I'll definitely give it a look-see! Thanks for the link :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can check out the wiki pages in the project, there's everything you need. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abelmoschus Esculentus - Awesome deal! Thanks again! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:01, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Marve

He has a warrant out for his arrest but I can't figure out why his page is locked. Jwsmith1979 (talk) 03:22, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The page is protected, not locked. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 03:38, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RJ Nieto references

The RJ Nieto article which you locked contains content that are cited to Facebook posts, the subject's website (thinkingpinoy.net) and a non-news unverified source (memebuster.net). Since I can't edit it please revise the article and remove these questionable contents and citations. Thanks. NoNDeSCRiPT (talk) 08:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NoNDeSCRiPT - Can you make an edit request that details exactly what needs to be changed and removed? Once this is done, I can take a look and apply the changes (assuming no objections or issues are found). Let me know if you have any questions about filing an edit request and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. Thanks for the message and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:RegisHRG

RegisHRG (talk · contribs)

Could you perform a username/spam block on this account? They're promoting a company that directly aligns with their username. Thanks. 108.3.157.205 (talk) 18:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quick apology

My apologies, I wanted to update my progress in the backlog elimination drive, and it seems I made a mistake. It should be fixed now.Triangleman3 (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Triangleman3! I just realized what you were trying to do, and I removed the warning from your user talk page because of this. No apologies are needed - mistakes happen all the time and it's not a big deal. Thanks for the message and I hope you have a great day :-). Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 21:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sharing the same IP with a IP blocked anon user.

Commiserations

I accidentally pressed on the "contributions" button without being logged in (something that I do fairly regularly - force of habit)

Today though instead of just seeing a blank page, I came across this (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:587:0:0:0:0:0:0/32)

A person who you have banned due to disruptive edits.

This user is obviously Greek (like me) however I can confirm that I haven't made those edits (they are wildly unrelated to the subjects I contribute to).

Pardon my ignorance, but is this just a coincidence of matching dynamic IP's, or is it something I should worry about and take precautions against?

Thanks in advance.

Johndark93 (talk) 09:30, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Johndark93 - So long as you log in and edit from your Johndark93 account every time, you should have nothing to worry about :-). Let me know if you have any more questions or concerns and I'll be happy to help you further. Happy editing! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:43, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Filter #51

An IP editor was claiming to be you at User talk:188.29.165.201. Luckily, suspicious admins were watching and declined his request. His filter log includes your name which may suggest you have some knowledge of this issue. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:18, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I added the information on the page "Impractical Jokers" as that was a nickname they referred to him in the show and I meant no offense or malice by adding it. If it was perceived as so I apologize and I will do more due diligence in the future to determine what is right to add to a page.



Kayor056Kayor056 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:08, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi. As you know, my talk page and pages of some other users were attacked by vandal Eno Espanto (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Please remove all his edits because they contains Russian abusive language and insults.--Весельчак (talk) 16:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 11:47, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I meant hiding the contents off all Edits.--Весельчак (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Весельчак: Maybe you should ask another admin. Few people know Russian here so it's not necessary, but if you request then definitely someone will do it for you :) ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 15:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you delete my user profile in wikipedia

My name is viglobe and I have just created my profile, then I see you have deleted my profile. Please open it again. Thank you so much bro ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viglobe (talk • contribs) 15:49, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there and Welcome to Wikipedia! While I can't be sure why your userpage was deleted, I recommend reading WP:UP before proceeding to make another userpage. Also be sure to check out The New User Tutorial. Thanks! Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:45, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hate

Why do a lot of ip and Wikipedia users hate you a lot ARMcgrath (talk) 18:31, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@ARMcgrath: Because Oshwah does a lot of recent changes patrolling, reverting vandalism and blocking vandals and long-term abuses. That's the fate of RCPs. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 15:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't wanna get blocked, but this makes me mad!

If you don't read my account profile then you might otherwise be aware that I'm obsessed with This French cartoon from 1997. I've been on a bajillion websites and virtually every/any website mentioning that show will, did, or would refer to Candy with Male pronouns, I was okay with this, then I watched the show, and I was still okay with this, and theeen! I watched a 7 part walkthrough of the video game Stupid invaders, and that's where it was stated that Candy is transgender and wants to go back to their home planet for a sex change, so then after making the discovery I checked out the Space Goofs wiki page on them and it also used male pronouns (from what I remember), then there were these other websites and even CREEPYPASTAS referring to them with male pronouns (but here I'm using neutral pronouns to be inoffensive). Is this something that should be changed in Wikipedia or would you consider the video game to be a stand alone type thing? Emiship'05 (talk) 00:48, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Emiship'05 - I respect that you're attempting to edit and update an article about a television show that you clearly show a high interest in, but when someone talks about how they want to update an article and change something that involves a highly contentious topic (i.e. guns, gender, race, or nationality to name a few), I respond by highly cautioning you from editing the article - especially when you say that you're "mad about it" or that your interest is otherwise beyond that of a typical neutral editor. Whether the TV show fiction or non-fiction is irrelevant; unless you have reliable sources to verify the information you're explaining here and know how to cite these sources as well as know and understand Wikipedia's important policies and guidelines very well (such as Wikipedia's policies on dispute resolution, neutral point of view, edit warring, discretionary sanctions, civility, and others) - I highly recommend that you make an edit request instead of trying to make those changes yourself. It will keep you out of getting involved in a "crossfire" with other editors who may have a bias or viewpoint regarding those topics. I know this is a complicated and long answer, but my recommendation will keep you in "safe waters" until you get yourself affiliated and proficient with all of the policies that I listed - then will you understand why I gave this answer. If you have any more questions or concerns, please let me know and I'll be happy to help you further. Thanks again for the message and I wish you happy editing :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:59, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AN RFC

Hi Oshwah, I don't know if you can help, but this request for closure has been waiting more than two weeks and the Request for Comments is more than two months old. Can anything be done to resolve it? GPRamirez5 (talk) 14:58, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GPRamirez5: Oshwah is currently not available. Can you ask another active admin? Regards ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 15:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello Oshwah! Am I still not ready for Rollback yet?Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Thegooduser: WP:PERM/R. Regards ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt) (talk to me) 00:04, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Oshwah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 21:20, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Handled and replied :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Space Goofs article breaking the MOS:GENDERID rule?

It's about time I let you know about this. So Candy (a character from the show) is referred to with male pronouns on Wikipedia. I watched a gameplay video of the video game Stupid invaders (which is based on the show), and in the game Candy mentions that they are transgender and wants to get sex reassignment surgery. In France male pronouns are gender neutral, and since the show was made in France I didn't question it, but the English dub still refers to Candy an effeminate male. So is this breaking a "law" on Wikipedia or am I just TOO obsessed with the topic in question? Atlantic Ranter 9705 (talk) 16:24, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Oshwah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 01:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've also responded to this email :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An Award for You!

The Official Wikipedia award of Oshwah's Hair
Oshwah Comes Back With Some Crazy Hair ! Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 02:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thegooduser - LOL! I always come back with crazy hair :-P ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:34, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

You came back in time :) ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt) (talk to me) 07:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abelmoschus Esculentus - It's good to be back! I try to stay consistently active on Wikipedia, but (as you know) life gets busy at times and important things in life have to have priority and those things come first... unfortunately, there's only 24 hours in a day :-P ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle development

Hi why don’t you participate in Huggle development? I believe you know coding and you have an account on GitHub. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt) (talk to me) 08:15, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abelmoschus Esculentus - Honestly, I've been meaning to for quite some time but I've just been busy with my involvement with current Wikipedia projects to take on more, and real life has kept me busy on top of all this. It's definitely on my "to do" list as far as new projects go someday, but (as with any new project) it needs to work and be beneficial for both myself and the community before I commit myself. I don't want to stretch myself too thin and be someone that's juggling too much and hence not involved to the level as each project needs me to be. I do my best to stay active as a helper and an expert user of Huggle, but at this time this is the level of involvement that I need to stay at. Will change someday; just stay tuned ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oic. You are the most considerate user I’ve ever met. Yes, development of Huggle only benefits a small portion of contributors. However, blocking a LTA or vandal benefits the ENTIRE community, or even the WORLD. Look forward to seeing you in Github in the (near) future.. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (alt) (talk to me) 08:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abelmoschus Esculentus - I appreciate the kind words :-). Someday ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:41, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

Oshwah you disappoint me, when you first blocked me or reported me. I thought oh it's fine one time only but sooner or later you blocked me again because of your fake reasons of vandalism. Sometime later on the Fujiwara clan page, I put real information like the year that the Fujiwara clan was founded but after that you or Kintetsu Buffalo reported me and blocked me and gave me one more chance before I was blocked from editing because of your vandalism 'reasons' or nonsense facts but here's one thing, i have the group to take you down and you don't wanna know what that group is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 404NotDiscovered (talk • contribs) 09:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Oshwah&oldid=851133114"