User talk:Clements1997
Welcome!
{{help me}} How do you add references from another Wikipedia page?
Hello, Clements1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Philomena McDonagh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ducknish (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
The article Philomena McDonagh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ducknish (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Clements1997, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
Hi Clements1997!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
|
Hello, Clements1997. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Glenna Forster-Jones, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Glenna Forster-Jones to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 22 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Glenna Forster-Jones page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Queen Victoria because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 5 albert square (talk) 22:01, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
September 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kat Slater. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. We don't add relatives to the Infobox if they have never shared a scene together. This is as per the consensus at WP:EE 5 albert square (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC) 5 albert square (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at List of EastEnders characters (2005). Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. –anemoneprojectors– 15:43, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Unsourced edit
Hello, I'm PhilKnight. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lady Penelope Creighton-Ward, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 15:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Edit summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.) 220 of Borg 19:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:43, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Clements1997. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Barbara Ashcroft, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Barbara Ashcroft to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, ToonLucas22 (talk) 17:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Barbara Ashcroft for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barbara Ashcroft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Ashcroft until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ToonLucas22 (talk) 17:40, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
The article Helen Cotterill has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jbh (talk) 15:23, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi, seeing as you didn't leave an edit summary, I just wondered if you could clarify this edit. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 13:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. The character already appeared in that section, didn't see why she was there twice to begin with. Clements1997 (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
- Great stuff! I didn't even notice. Thanks :-) anemoneprojectors 17:43, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Sure. The character already appeared in that section, didn't see why she was there twice to begin with. Clements1997 (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
References
Hi Clements1997, I can help you create references. They are very easy to do, once you get the technique. Drop me a line, and I will take you through it.scope_creep (talk) 23:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Unexplained article restoration
Hi there, I've noticed that you've restored five articles related to Three's Company with no explanation.[1][2][3][4][5]. Each of these was previously redirected by AldezD in good faith on the basis that the articles didn't properly demonstrate that the general notability guideline had been met. I don't see that you've improved the article or addressed Aldez's concerns in any way, nor do I see that you've attempted to discuss this with anyone, so I'm curious on what basis you can justify restoring those articles. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
@Wbm1058: Since you've restored the Chrissy Snow article to a redirect, do you have any thoughts to express here? Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:00, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Chrissy Snow was in Category:Articles with redirect hatnotes needing review, because Christmas Snow redirects to List of Three's Company characters#Chrissy Snow, and I get annoyed anytime I am obligated to do maintenance on articles about fictional characters. I also note #References above. wbm1058 (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- I agree with reverting all. They were redirected for a good reason. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:43, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of Coronation Street characters (1961) into Len Fairclough. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Recent edits
Hi. Regarding your recent edits to disambiguation (dab) and anthropononym (APO) pages, please read MOS:DABENTRY and WP:APO/S. Namely, there should only be one blue link per entry in a dab page, and no links in the descriptor for an APO page. Do read what those two guidelines say about when to use WP:PIPE as well. Bennv3771 (talk) 01:47, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Clements1997. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Uncredited roles need sources
Please be advised that uncredited roles in films (and presumably other media) should be supported by the inclusion of reliable sources. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 16:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
- When adding information to Wikipedia, it's best to start with a reliable source, and use that as the basis for what you put into an article. (It's easy, then, obviously, to add an inline citation, which will usually protect your text from being deleted.)
- Personal knowledge (recognizing an actor when you view a movie, for example), or something you've read in a discussion group, or something that you heard a friend mention, should not be the basis for changing a Wikipedia article. If you can't find a reliable source for what you want to add, and then use that source to change the Wikipedia article, well, there are lots of other Wikipedia articles that need improving, articles where you can find reliable sources as the basis for changes.
- Also, thanks for your work on improving Wikipedia. I know that the rules can sometimes be frustrating, but they really are there for a good reason. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 16:14, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
February 2020
Hello, I'm JuneGloom07. I noticed that you recently removed content from Duffy (Casualty) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Each character listed in the significant others section are mentioned and sourced in the article. – JuneGloom07 Talk 23:56, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Day After Tomorrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balmoral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Maxwell.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
January 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Rebecca (novel), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. No need to add every detail about every minor character. That level of detail does not improve the article MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited You Rang, M'Lord?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeffrey Holland.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brian Murphy, Arthur Kelly and Christine Moore.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Brookside
Would you consider using edit summaries so everyone can understand your edits better. In addition, where you have made changes to character duration dates - where did you get that information from? For instance, I knew Doreen Corkhill's duration was incorrect. I couldn't find a source to change it. I also could not find a source for her last appearance? And where did you get Sinbad's duration from? The character list contains a large amount of redirects to the list itself, redlinks and links needing disambiguation. The list has been tagged now which is bad news.Rain the 1 09:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
- No answer yet you carry on adding content to the list. Where are you finding these additional or recurring characters. The list already suffers from no sourcing - it doesn't need countless more unsourced additions.Rain the 1 10:05, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moment of Truth: Why My Daughter?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Burke.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Disambiguation link notification for August 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Knots Landing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tracy Reed.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cardiac Arrest (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Healey.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Coronation Street characters (1965), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annie Walker.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Brookside
In Alan Partridge's article you added a series of relatives to the info box. Do they ever appear or are they just mentioned by Alan? Also how do we know for definite that Alan's father's surname was also Partridge? Molly only mentioned that he was named Cyril and died 10 years prior.Rain the 1 19:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Raintheone They're mentioned in conversation between Alan and Molly, and based off cultural and social context of the time - plus Molly's highly traditional views as depicted in the show - I think it unlikely that Alan was born outside of wedlock Clements1997 (talk) 23:52, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- They were mentioned briefly in a scene but never appeared on-screen. Normally we would not include those characters. I understand his surname probably would have been Partridge but it is still original research.Rain the 1 19:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Ladykillers (1955 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Goodwin.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
October 2023
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Michael Scott (The Office), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Brookside characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Con O'Neill.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)