Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject South Africa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ponyboybreakaway (talk | contribs) at 02:49, 14 November 2009 (→‎Current participants: add). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

How can I help?
Article Assessment
See also: Quality scale and South Africa articles by quality


South Africa articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 2 1 8 4 2 17
FL 1 6 6 13
A 2 1 3
GA 4 10 37 48 2 101
B 27 64 140 309 12 552
C 41 138 728 1,402 595 2,904
Start 55 240 2,180 4,751 2,293 9,519
Stub 55 2,221 7,215 3,436 12,927
List 2 14 474 520 8 1,018
Category 9,256 9,256
Disambig 46 46
File 132 132
Portal 91 91
Project 88 88
Redirect 2 9 1,295 1,306
Template 750 750
NA 4 3 2 9
Other 2 81 83
Assessed 131 523 5,802 14,270 11,741 6,348 38,815
Unassessed 3 3 1,001 1,007
Total 131 523 5,802 14,273 11,744 7,349 39,822
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 138,580 Ω = 5.33
This chart is updated every 2 to 7 days by a bot.
See Using the bot for more information.

Scope

This WikiProject aims primarily to help coordinate and improve pages on:

  1. South Africa
  2. The History of South Africa
  3. South Africans.

Participating

The project welcomes new members; there is more than enough work for all. If you wish to join the project, please edit this section and add your name. You can also add template {{User WikiProject South Africa}} to your talk page.

Current participants

See also category:WikiProject South Africa participants for members that have a {{User WikiProject South Africa}} on their userpage.

Task Forces

Quality scale

Article should be assessed and a grading added to the AfricaProject template on the article's talk page by adding class= to the template.

Example: {{AfricaProject|South Africa=Yes|class=start}}
Information on Grading Scheme
WikiProject article quality grading scheme
Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example
 FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

  1. It is:
    1. well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard;
    2. comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
    3. well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate;
    4. neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;
    5. stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and
    6. compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing.
  2. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of:
    1. a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
    2. appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and
    3. consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required.
  3. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly.
  4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate.
 Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. P. K. van der Byl
 FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
  1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
  2. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
  3. Comprehensiveness.
  4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
  5. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages.
  6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.
 Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
(as of May 2018)
 A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).
 Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River
(as of June 2014)
 GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations.
More detailed criteria
A good article is:
  1. Well-written:
    1. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    2. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    1. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    2. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
    3. it contains no original research; and
    4. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    1. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    2. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
    1. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    2. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
 Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Nelson Mandela
B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards.
More detailed criteria
  1. The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional.
  2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
  3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
  4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.
  5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
  6. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible.
 Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Siege of Kimberley
C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
 Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Gautrain
Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources.
More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
  • A useful picture or graphic
  • Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
 Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. 32 Battalion (South Africa)
Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Algoa Bay Yacht Club
List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of heritage sites in South Africa

Current article assessments can be see in Category:South Africa articles by quality

See also: South Africa articles by quality

Templates

Project banner

{{AfricaProject|South Africa=yes}} should be added to the talk pages of all articles within the Category:South Africa or any of its subcategories. It automatically adds these articles to the Category:WikiProject South Africa articles and will render in the talk page as follow:

WikiProject iconAfrica: South Africa Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa.

When adding the project banner to a talk page already containing one or more banners from other projects, consider using the {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} template in order to avoid cluttering the article talk page. Example: 

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{SomeOtherProjectBanner|...}}
{{AfricaProject|importance= |class= |attention= |South Africa=Yes|South Africa-importance=}}
}}

Userbox

{{User South Africa}}
This user comes from
South Africa.
{{User WikiProject South Africa}}
This user proudly participates in
WikiProject South Africa.

Other templates

Main page: Wikipedia:WikiProject_South_Africa/Templates

Additional South African specific templates can be found in Category:South Africa templates and should be used on articles as appropriate. A list of commonly used South African related templates is available at WikiProject South Africa/Templates

Categories

Categories to assist administrators and project members
South Africa Wikipedia administration‎ (8 C)
South African Categories
South Africa‎ (15 C, 3 P)

Languages

Use {{lang}}, for marking up non-English words or phrases:

{{lang|af|Afrikaans phrase}}
{{lang|nr|South Ndebele phrase}}
{{lang|nd|North Ndebele phrase}}
{{lang|st|Southern Sotho phrase}}
{{lang|ss|Swati phrase}}
{{lang|tn|Tswana phrase}}
{{lang|ve|Venda phrase}}
{{lang|xh|Xhosa phrase}}
{{lang|zu|Zulu phrase}}

See List of ISO 639-1 codes for more language codes.

Recognized content

Featured articles

Good articles

Did You Knows (DYKs)

An easy way of updating this list is by using the CatScan tool and asking for articles that are in both the WikiProject South Africa articles category and the Wikipedia Did you know articles category. Requesting the results in CSV format make it easy to quickly create the list in a spreadsheet application.Example

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team release version selections

Formerly recognized content

Former featured articles

Former good articles

Open tasks

Wikipedia guidelines
Behavioral
Discussions
Content
Editing
Organization
Style
Deletion
Project content
Other
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article alerts

Template:ArticleAlertbotSubscription

Wikipedia Books

For an introduction to Wikipedia Books, see Wikipedia:Books

Related Projects and pages

Related pages that has become inactive

Resources

Wiki tools

On the English Wikipedia

External Online Resources

Online University libraries

South African Government Sources

Offline Resources

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_South_Africa&oldid=325733021"