Jump to content

Talk:Hinduism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Raam2 (talk | contribs) at 16:45, 21 July 2014 (→‎Conversion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleHinduism is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 24, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
March 29, 2006Featured article reviewKept
June 26, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
December 4, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
January 4, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 10, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Former featured article


western view on hinduism

Why western view on Hinduism. Either put Hinduism view on Christianity and islam (described in ved, purans) in wikipedia or remove western view from Hinduism. This is double standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.241.127.1 (talk) 14:02, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See, for example, Criticism of Christianity#Criticism by other religions. Criticism of Islam is also much larger than the equivalent for Hinduism. Rwessel (talk) 15:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repeats itself

This article, in a number of places, repeats verbatim. Additionally the citations are so numerous that they distract and so many are unlikely to be necessary.Abitslow (talk) 19:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Go through the history of this article, and you'll see that many points were disputed; therefor, there are so many references. Quite a lot of editors on this article are only familiar with traditional views on Hinduism, not with contemporary scholarly insights. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sanatana Dharma again

The term "Sanatana Dharma" is already in the lead. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And in a properly nuanced way. --NeilN talk to me 04:15, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion

In this section of the article, "Islamic rule and sects of Hinduism (c. 1100-1850 CE)", there is a sentence, "During this period Buddhism declined rapidly and large number of Hindus converted to Islam" - please change that to "During this period Buddhism declined rapidly and a large number of Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam", because people were forcibly converted to Islam.-Raam2 (talk) 15:09, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Raam2: What sources do you have to back up that statement? --NeilN talk to me 16:34, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One source for forced conversion is, "Dalit's Inheritance in Hindu Religion", by Mahendra Singh, found at http://books.google.co.in/books?id=7CoelGoA6l8C&pg=PA126&lpg=PA126&dq=forced+conversion+aurangzeb&source=bl&ots=vgIv6_rEtA&sig=l3qhDFgLBMiHPff-qF8i6hOr4tI&hl=en&sa=X&ei=oYzKU4vqLYv48QWJ2oLADw&ved=0CFAQ6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q=forced%20conversion%20aurangzeb&f=false and another is at http://www.infinityfoundation.com/mandala/h_es/h_es_malfuzat_frameset.htmRaam2 (talk) 16:45, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]