Talk:Mahatma Gandhi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 128: Line 128:
Why is "Mahatma" okay to use in an article title, but not "Saint"? [[User:Rosekelleher|Rosekelleher]] ([[User talk:Rosekelleher|talk]]) 21:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Why is "Mahatma" okay to use in an article title, but not "Saint"? [[User:Rosekelleher|Rosekelleher]] ([[User talk:Rosekelleher|talk]]) 21:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mahatma_Gandhi/Archive_11#Requested_move]. Apparently it is so. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 22:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
:[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mahatma_Gandhi/Archive_11#Requested_move]. Apparently it is so. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 22:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

:Where did you read that "Saint" isn't allowed in article titles? The articles about [[Saint George]] and [[Saint Peter]] don't follow that rule, if it is a rule.[[User:TheFreeloader|TheFreeloader]] ([[User talk:TheFreeloader|talk]]) 15:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2016 ==
== Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2016 ==

Revision as of 15:51, 21 March 2016

Template:Vital article

Former featured articleMahatma Gandhi is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleMahatma Gandhi has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 1, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 22, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
June 1, 2005Featured article reviewKept
February 17, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 12, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
May 9, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
May 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article, current good article


formatting error

Indentation error after the Einstein quotation. Article's semi-protected status means anonymous users can't make the correction.

Semi-protected edit request on 26 August 2015

The father of the nation

I think the "father of the nation" paragraph shouldn't be in the lead of the article. It is a duplicate of the same paragraph, Mahatma_Gandhi#Father_of_the_Nation in the article, and the lead should summarize. I will boldly make an edit accordingly. Debresser (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a heavily trafficked page, and such pages need to be watched with the eyes of a hawk. As you will see here, this was not an issue two years ago. Thanks for noticing, and correcting. Also, I dimly recall a consensus (?) to avoid the use of (non-English) vernacular scripts, which too have made an appearance. I'm not sure the "Bharat" bit is needed. Am pinging @RegentsPark:, who would know. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:INDICSCRIPT I've removed the devnagri from the lead para. Also, replaced Bharat by India (which is, after all, the name of the country). Agree about the Father of the Nation para (thanks Debresser!). --regentspark (comment) 21:33, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Primary School invitation

Hi everybody. On behalf of the teams behind the Wikipedia Primary School research project, I would like to announce that this article was selected a while ago to be reviewed by an external expert. We'd now like to ask interested editors to join our efforts and improve the article before February 28, 2016 as they see fit; a revision will be then sent to the designated expert for review. Any notes and remarks written by the external expert will be made available on this page under a CC-BY-SA license as soon as possible, so that you can read them, discuss them and then decide if and how to use them. Please sign up here to let us know you're collaborating. Thanks a lot for your support! -- Anthere (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this. Is this a primary school project in South Africa? Will this article itself be modified to make it appropriate for elementary schools? (For the record, I don't believe it is Wikipedia's job to write articles for elementary schools (or, for that matter, colleges); as everyone knows, Wikipedia is not censored.) And who selected this expert, and where was this decision made? It doesn't sound like he has worked in elementary school education, nor is he a historian of modern India. People who edit Wikipedia have all sorts of motivations and interests. The article quality too, in a much trafficked article such is this, keeps changing, depending on who has edited it recently and what POV has driven their edit. (Sometimes articles get mangled; see for example the version of V. S. Naipaul that I was attempting to improve two years ago, before I went on a longish Wikileave, and what it has become today.) The English professor is welcome to review the article, but if the article itself is changed by editors in light of those remarks, without appealing to WP's well worn principles, that is, I expect there will be resistance. (As far as I'm aware, external experts are usually sought in situations involving content disputes, but maybe things have changed.) All the best. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:11, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mahatma vs. Saint

Why is "Mahatma" okay to use in an article title, but not "Saint"? Rosekelleher (talk) 21:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1]. Apparently it is so. --regentspark (comment) 22:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you read that "Saint" isn't allowed in article titles? The articles about Saint George and Saint Peter don't follow that rule, if it is a rule.TheFreeloader (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2016

Wowpolaki (talk) 10:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Wowpolaki:  Not done. Who or what is Eileen Stronzo, why/how are they notable, and why are you posting this on the talk page of the Mahatma Gandhi article? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 14:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]