User talk:Shovon76: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:02, 1 September 2008

Tip of the moment...

The three-revert rule

Many people know that if someone reverts an article more than three times in 24 hours (3RR), they may be blocked to prevent edit warring. But did you know that:

Although reverts on different articles do not count towards the limit, different reverts on the same article do count. So if you revert Paragraph A twice and Paragraph B twice in 24 hours, you have made four reverts and may be blocked.
If you revert three times, wait for 24 hours and start reverting again, you may be blocked for 'gaming' the rule. The three-revert rule is an electric fence, not an entitlement.
Although you cannot be blocked for repeatedly reverting vandalism, many Wikipedians mistake edits for vandalism when they are not. For example, edits that do not respect the neutral point of view policy are not vandalism.

The easiest way to avoid being blocked for reverting is to revert as little as possible and discuss with your fellow editors instead. Some editors limit themselves to one or no reverts a day. Select categories on Wikipedia are limited to 1RR (one revert rule). Those articles will have an edit notice to apprise you of their special status. For 1RR you may only revert one edit in the entire category per 24-hours.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Please check Pritam's talk page

Please check the talk page for Pritam. I have left a message there Pfonilonitappa (talk) 10:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Pritam edit

Hi. I have replied to your statement about the plagiarism section in the talk page for Pritam. Pfonilonitappa (talk) 18:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

You appear to be a bit confused about how contesting a proposed deletion works. From WP:PROD: "If anyone, including the article's creator, removes a prod tag from an article for any reason, do not put it back". Catchpole (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. in Catchpoles talk page as, "I am neither confused, nor ignorant of the rule. But it seems that you have not read the edit summaries. May be you can refer to this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#.22Unrealiable_prodders.22. Thanks." Shovon (talk) 17:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bangla WP

Care to take a look at the Bangla wikipediatoo? We have very few editors from WB there, and definitely need more people to contribute. --Ragib (talk) 07:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

congratulation for joining bengali wikipedia and keen on contributing.....Jayantanth (talk) 10:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are very much welcome to translate articles from en to bn wiki. Feel free to start articles there. The Bangla keyboard is built in, or you can use a tool like Avro for typing. --Ragib (talk) 15:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AceRemoteProject page

Dear Shovon76, AceRemoteProject page was intended to be linked to the List of PM software page - it was not an advertisement, but one more pm software - different from the others in some features and common in the generally available features throughout the other soft of this category like MS Project, @task and so on. The additional communication features are valuable for project managers (as an active contributor to couple of the IT pm communities I know it). Please do not be so fast to delete the article, when I start it again - it takes time for me to finish it, but I will be trying to be prompt. thanks, Slava.myra Slava.myra (talk) 12:11, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My response is here. Shovon (talk) 09:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the response, Shovon. and for the advice. I'll follow it, and the Wikipedia writing guideline to my best when I try again. Slava.myra (talk) 11:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hwlwighati

Hi, Shovon. I've responded to your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hwlwighati. I think the existence of the town can now be established (though not the name used as the article's title), but you're probably in a better position than I to confirm that the "Shilghati" in the Google results is the place the article refers to. Let me know what you think. Deor (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your expert opinion wanted on Fan death

Hi, Shovon. Many thanks for your kind message asking me to check on this page. I checked it, and yes, I completely agree with you. Such a thing is not possible. I have neither come across such a death (despite having conducted more than 20,000 autopsies so far), nor have met anyone who came across such a death. An extensive search of literature failed to retrieve even a single case of a fan death. The logic advanced for this phenomenon is completely bogus. In my opinion, a good urban legend should at least sound credible. This one does not even sound like one.

Thanks for your confidence reposed in me.

Warm regards

Anil Aggrawal Anil1956 (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dr_anil@hotmail.com

anil@anilaggrawal.com

Hello Mr.shovon, saw your message on my webpage. there is absolutely no doubt that FBI is federal bureau of investigation. Be advised that any one propogating cheap non-sense, pseudo history and lies to create interpretations of theirs, will be done to so by me. issuing threats to me shall be counterproductive.If it continues even your name shall go to the same.

                                                               -Vyaghra dhataki, sembian_valavan

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008

Project News

Tag & Assess 2008, an assessment drive initiated by the assessment department began on June 7, 2008 and will be running until July 2008. Many Wikipedians have started contributing to this mammoth task. This housekeeping activity will help manage articles in better way. You can also get involved!
Bot Assisted Assessment was successfully done using Bot0612 in May 2008. 1744 articles (18.5%) of all India unassessed articles were marked if they had been assessed by some other project.
What's Featured and Good?

Five new articles were promoted to featured article status in 2008: Western Chalukya architecture, 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings, Akhtar Hameed Khan, Preity Zinta, Kannada literature in the Vijayanagara Empire.
Two new lists were given featured list status in 2008: List of international cricket centuries by Sachin Tendulkar, List of Victoria Cross recipients by nationality.
There is currently one Indian article as a featured article nominee. Two more articles, (Bengali language, Kazi Nazrul Islam) are undergoing featured article reviews. You could help save these two articles by leaving your comments or assisting the involved editors.
Three articles are undergoing good article nominations: Anekantavada, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and Santosh Subramaniam.

IPL was hot on Wikipedia too!!! During the tournament, the article was among the most frequently edited articles. It is currently the only Indian article in top 100, occupying 58th spot.
Do you know of an article that is currently underrated? If so, please nominate the article at the Assessment Department's request for assessment. This will allow our project to get a better idea of the quality of our articles.

Article statistics and to-do lists

Article Statistics

Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.

Complete To-Do List

Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.

Current proposals and discussions
Is India the largest democracy? A request has been made to the Mediation Cabal for mediation on India article. There is currently an ongoing edit war if India be called the largest democracy of world. Interested in a specific topic? Article watchlists have been automated using Ganeshbot. Just locate your watchlist to keep track of all articles within the topic. Example:Wikipedia:WikiProject Chennai/Articles. Wikipedia India Quiz continues to attract old and new Wikipedians and remains a hotspot of the community. You are invited to join in and have fun.
From the Editors
If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject India and also may choose to get this newsletter get it delivered as desired. This is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 2 – July 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! The last newsletter was more than a year ago and after feeling the pinch, we got together in working towards in renewing this feature for our members. Fresh pair of legs we are, and hence can greatly improve with your suggestions and ideas. Please feel free to let us know of your thoughts. We hope to release the newsletter on a monthly/bi-monthly basis as per our initial thoughts. Contributors to this Issue Mspraveen (Co-editor) Gppande (Co-editor) Tinucherian (Co-editor, Distributor)
Did You Know?
‹ The template below (Deleted template) is being considered for deletion. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › ... that India was the 44th most visited page on Wikipedia in February 2008 and it received received 706,558 visitors in May 2008? ‹ The template below (Deleted template) is being considered for deletion. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. › ... that if you need any help, advice, or have any announcements to make regarding India-related articles then you can do it here?

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Rollback granted

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Acalamari 17:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Acalamari 19:25, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bharatiya Janata Party

I recently tried to revert some unsourced POV from the Bharatiya Janata Party article. As the edit history is long and various parts of the article are unsourced - I took a step back and reverted to the last editor who is making unsourced edits. I do not know how to help this page, but if there is anything I can do to help, please let me know. I will watch the page to see the progression of these recent edits. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This might be ...

... interesting to you. Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Ronosen. A whole laundry list of related users found via checkuser to be linked closely, and likely to be the same person. --Ragib (talk) 19:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one of the users listed in the checkuser openly admitted to be using open proxies for editing wikipedia. Most likely they're using zombie machines as proxies. Such machines are blocked at sight by WP. --Ragib (talk) 19:50, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment moved from user page

The below section is shifted from my user page to here. It had been contributed by an IP user 122.163.203.152.

- Hi, since i don't know how to send messages to people on wikipedia since it has a very crappy and geeky interface, which people cannot understand easily, I am posting this message to you, over here. This is regarding my second edit to the article on Pritam Chakraborty. I admit to vandalising in the FIRST edit. That was reverted, with a warning saying to write from a neutral point of view. WOW! I vandalise and get a stern warning advising me to write with a neutral point of view. So then I decided that i wouldn't vandalise, and decided to write with a neutral point of view. In the plagirism section, I made a table showing the songs he has been ACCUSED of plagiarising. I provided a valid link to a reference in the proper way. Yet, you decided to call THIS edit as an act of vandalism. My edit was sweetly deleted. All I got was a message to refrain from vandalising. Come on. You must be kidding me! Did you give enough reasons as to why you reverted my edit? From this act of yours, I can assume that either you are too proud of this article and don't want people editing it without your consent, or I can assume that you love Pritam so much, you can't stand hearing the truth about him. I have heard the original songs. No matter how much you beat around the bush, saying that the songs are only "vaguely" familiar (yeah, right!), the truth is that it's terrible what he does. Not only are the songs really familiar, He gives no credit to the people he takes these songs from. That is really not fair. Look at my edit and see those songs. Instead of pushing the revert button instantaneously, first look at those original songs on the reference mentioned and listen to them. Then think about it. Well, anyway, I really don't care about whether my edit gets to stay or not. I now just know that wikipedia is not the encyclopedia that "anyone" can edit. Its the encyclopedia that anyone who knows how to write and article in the proper formatting, with a lot of nothing-to-do time on his hand can edit, where the articles are "governed" by self-proclaimed "custodians", who are hypocrites and geeks. and only allow edits to be made if THEY think its right. Instead of wasting their time in designing such a cryptic interface with so many "rules" and "guidelines", and creating a jargon-ridden world of their own, why can't some people face the truth and admit certain things? Anyway, whoever you are, do at least READ my article for once, instead of pressing the revert button. Instead of deleting this edit to your profile and sending me a pastel coloured warning or blocking my account from wikipedia, reply to me in the way you do and tell my why my edit was deemed plagiarism.

Shovon (talk) 21:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sam manakshaw

why di you removed his Quoited words?Suyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 17:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir i didnt get you Suyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 05:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok i am extremely sorry for that, can you correct my mistake and again add his quoted words? I again apologizes for that its all my fault I shouldn't had use fire fox for editingSuyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 09:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you sir your your word of support . Actually I joined Wikipedia to expand Indian articles but I don't have guts to edit then I always fear that I if did a mistake some one will block me!! that is why my most of editing is tagging the articles, spelling check, image upload,etc. In short I do back stage work but your words has given me huge support and I am going to edit important articles.thank you very much sir.

one thing i forgot that I was also fearing that will our people like this comment of sam over here because in this comment sam is directly saying that our politications are headless!! so it might have hurted some wikipedians once again sorry and thank youSuyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 17:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I won't vandalise

Hello, Shovon. I shall not vandalise. Please tell Pritam not to steal music, though. Please remove that freaky sock puppet tag you have on my account. Why is wikipedia "The encyclopedia that anyone can edit", when Jimbo Wales himself says that nobody has the inherent right to edit wikipedia? Why isn't there an * in front of wikipedia's tagline? Can you explain this? If you can't, don't patroll wikipedia. lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfonilonitappa (talk • contribs) 17:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didnot vandalise Rajus community. there is nothing vandalising in my text. There are few instances of Rajus(Kshatriyas) with North and Central royal families. Please see the link. http://www.uq.net.au/~zzhsoszy/ips/v/vizianagram.html sorry I forgot to attach the above link in the wiki :-( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indianprithvi (talk • contribs) 19:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yeah

Well, my username is just a series of random keystrokes. Anyway, it is not really an easy task to edit wikipedia articles. I have previously tried to do it legitimately. I have tried to change information where it seems to be incorrect, giving sources, but the "custodians" of those articles have always reverted, not even listening to whatever someone has to say. I know this is for the good, but i mean, how do you guys operate? Do you patroll random articles looking for signs of edits, or have you guys divided your patrolling duty? Exactly how many wikipedia custodians are there? Have you ever vandalised? Have you ever been blocked? Come on, don't tell me you've never had some fun with messing around with wikipedia. Pfonilonitappa (talk) 18:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Manekshaw

Hello sir now check this article Sam Manekshaw I have successfully added quoted--Suyogaerospace^{talk to me!} 02:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ferreira

Great work. Add a reference for 1st amateur Billiards player to cross 1000 points, and you got a DYK for sure (you have to nominate it here under today's date: Template talk:Did you know); please remember to nominate this after adding the ref. I'll try to add a few sentences, if I can. Cheers. --GDibyendu (talk) 15:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ferreira

On 21 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Michael Ferreira, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 07:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sino-Indian War

Don't keep reverting the edit I made. The statement I edited is POV Colliver55 (talk) 09:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great power

Thanks for your message on the Great power discussion page. I hope you know by now that Chanakya has a history of pushing a patriotic Indian POV. I've read much of his edits on Indian military related articles and I am honestly pretty saddened by the state of these articles (in terms of neutrality, in terms of rubbish sources). Hopefully, you can improve upon these articles when you have time. Thanks. Nirvana888 (talk) 15:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian hypocrites

as a indian you have shown that you are pathetically biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.236.217 (talk) 16:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My dear friend, I do not have to be certified by you. My edit history speaks for itself. Regarding your edits, probably the same cannot be said. Best of luck. Shovon (talk) 16:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

biased indian

stop vandalising articles please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nangparbat (talk • contribs) 18:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Labrador Retriever

Well, I have brought it up on the talk page, but his reply was "I dislike British english bias on Wikipedia". I don't really know what to do here. I had the page protected from someone who did this earlier, then this guy showed up. I'm not sure if this is important enouhg to being it up on the admin's noticeboard. --Plasma Twa 2 18:52, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I reported him at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism‎. He has recieved his final warning. I'm at the 3RR right now and will be unable to revert his vandalism for the rest of today, though if he does it again I will report him again. --Plasma Twa 2 19:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I only came across the page when I was looking up potential dogs. Didn't find the spelling problems until after I edited the page to include the countries in the infobox. On a side note, both CPO Pieman and 68.77.27.63 have been blocked for 55 hours due to vandalism against the Labrador Retriever page. --Plasma Twa 2 19:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations

please stop vandalising my page and accusing me of being a sock puppet you have no proof and keep your bigoted indian veiws in the mandir. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.69.230 (talk) 19:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Binayak Sen

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

You have quite a lot of guts, my dear IP editor from England. First, you fill up the article with references from all the biased sources and when some one cleans this up, you have the audacity to leave a warning message! BTW, I had restored the article to a good version only. Oh, and buy a dictionary, so that you get to understand the meaning of different words. Shovon (talk) 06:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POV

hi there i have noticed that you have placed pathetic claims without sources on azad kashmir without consulting anyone if you carry on your beloved jammu and kashmir will also be edited without your consensus kapish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.70.25 (talk) 19:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is so "azaad" about the Azad Kashmir? The edits made by you lack citations, are poor in grammar and smack of pro-Paki point of view. First of all, try to get rid of these and then accuse others of introducing biased material. Btw, can you construct a single, error free sentence in English? Oh, you know, in Sanskrit, Kapish means king of the apes! Lol! Shovon (talk) 20:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pro paki lol coming from a hindu who believe in kali mata who eats kids in sick cult type partys get a life hindu azad kashmir is the REAL NAME and has been for 61 years i dont know why you hindus are making a big issue of this now and again your hypocrasy your claims of POK are un sourced so unless you get a life and read properly dont bother vandalising pakistani article or you will get this on your Rundia articles like jammu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.70.25 (talk) 20:16, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whats so azaad look at the news headlines kid and see what your democratic hindu dominating country is gettign upto in jammu azad kashmir is a billion times better of than the jail that is jammu and kashmir (IOK) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.70.25 (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7585612.stm why dont you ask them how free jammu and kashmir(Indian occupied Kashmir) is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.70.25 (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See, my friend, if I want, I can also say may unflattering things about your religion, your country and so on. But I won't. That's simply because I did not have that kind of upbringing. People of Indian administered (or occupied, if that suits you) J&K had the equal rights as any other Indian (they were even more equal than the others thanks to Article 370). For example, although a Kashmiri Muslim can buy a piece of land or start a business in other parts of India, I can't do the same in Kashmir. Why do you choose to remain silent about two other parts of the state, Jammu and Ladakh? Why was India required to provide humanitarian aid and relief to the Azad(!) Kashmir after the earth quake? Personally, I believe, India should be better off without having traitor Kashmiris amidst us. Btw, you have not mentioned what are your sources. Shovon (talk) 20:43, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

as i recall you called me a "Paki" oh the irony —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.70.25 (talk) 20:57, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another thing you hindu cry over a few shops ask the children murdered by brave indian troops and raped women who are brutalised over NOTHING what they feel take your shop sob theory elsewhere its nothing compared to what oppressed muslims feel in Indian occupied Kashmir cant your hear the screams of freedom my freind or is the indian media blocking them recently? P.S you and your nationalist indian chum started to edit without consensus and sources then when its changed back to its unbiased stable state you moan of in justice what is this some indian movie? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.70.25 (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC) please be more quick with your response next time took you ages just to write some anti kashmiri sentence you indians change colour like Chameleons first kashmir is integral then traitors ha ha even when india sent in terrorists into balouchistan is still loved my balouch brothers they were just brainwashed by RAW agents see. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.70.25 (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sock

86.153.130.184 is a pro pakistani vandalizing articles. another user claimed he is a sock of a user called Nangparbat. please see [1] and [2]. help please. he is inserting pakistani argument everywhere n remove indian ones. he write administered near kashmir (india) n removes for pakistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.31.145 (talk) 18:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shovon76

for the past few days i left wikipedia as the war edits subsided on mountain in pakistan which overwhemingly stated they were disputed while indian mountains in kashmir didnt even mention this to make this worse the editors were ALL indians and repeatedly called me paki just as you said paki i snapped DONT EVER CALL ME PAKI AGAIN i dont care what it means in india indians also use POK but thats it only the INDIANS USE IT dont generalize things on articles and make it as the world does the reason i reverted your chums kashmir cloud edits is because he first tried to vandalize azad kashmir and failed then northern areas and he started to tag occupied all over it then he gave birth to POK pages this was the point were i decided anyone who backed this troll would also be a vandal themselves you supported his claims without no consensus so i snapped you seem like a nice guy i hope you understand oh yes sorry for calling you facist hindu bjp maybe you could apologize for calling me a paki nazi? good day 86.151.123.126 (talk) 21:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 298: / Line 298: @@
 .153.130.184 is a pro pakistani vandalizing articles. another user claimed he is a sock of a user called Nangparbat. please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.153.130.184] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nangparbat]. help please. he is inserting pakistani argument everywhere n remove indian ones. he write administered near kashmir (india) n removes for pakistan.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/218.111.31.145|218.111.31.145]] ([[User talk:218.111.31.145|talk]]) 18:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Shovon76 ==
+for the past few days i left wikipedia as the war edits subsided on mountain in pakistan which overwhemingly stated they were disputed while indian mountains in kashmir didnt even mention this to make this worse the editors were ALL indians and repeatedly called me paki just as you said paki i snapped DONT EVER CALL ME PAKI AGAIN i dont care what it means in india indians also use POK but thats it only the INDIANS USE IT dont generalize things on articles and make it as the world does the reason i reverted your chums kashmir cloud edits is because he first tried to vandalize azad kashmir and failed then northern areas and he started to tag occupied all over it then he gave birth to POK pages this was the point were i decided anyone who backed this troll would also be a vandal themselves you supported his claims without no consensus so i snapped you seem like a nice guy i hope you understand oh yes sorry for calling you facist hindu bjp maybe you could apologize for calling me a paki nazi? good day [[Special:Contributions/86.151.123.126|86.151.123.126]] ([[User talk:86.151.123.126|talk]]) 21:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)