Online chat
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/Gossip-chat.png/300px-Gossip-chat.png)
Online chat may refer to any kind of communication over the Internet that offers a real-time transmission of text messages from sender to receiver. Chat messages are generally short in order to enable other participants to respond quickly. Thereby, a feeling similar to a spoken conversation is created, which distinguishes chatting from other text-based online communication forms such as Internet forums and email. Online chat may address point-to-point communications as well as multicast communications from one sender to many receivers and voice and video chat, or may be a feature of a web conferencing service.
Online chat in a less stringent definition may be primarily any direct text-based or video-based (webcams), one-on-one chat or one-to-many group chat (formally also known as synchronous conferencing), using tools such as instant messengers, Internet Relay Chat (IRC), talkers and possibly MUDs. The expression online chat comes from the word chat which means "informal conversation". Online chat includes web-based applications that allow communication – often directly addressed, but anonymous between users in a multi-user environment. Web conferencing is a more specific online service, that is often sold as a service, hosted on a web server controlled by the vendor.
History
The first online chat system was called Talkomatic, created by Doug Brown and David R. Woolley in 1973 on the PLATO System at the University of Illinois. It offered several channels, each of which could accommodate up to five people, with messages appearing on all users' screens character-by-character as they were typed. Talkomatic was very popular among PLATO users into the mid-1980s. In 2014 Brown and Woolley released a web-based version of Talkomatic.
The first dedicated online chat service that was widely available to the public was the CompuServe CB Simulator in 1980,[1][2] created by CompuServe executive Alexander "Sandy" Trevor in Columbus, Ohio. Ancestors include network chat software such as UNIX "talk" used in the 1970s.
Chatiquette
The term chatiquette (chat etiquette) is a variation of netiquette (Internet etiquette) and describes basic rules of online communication.[3][4][5] These conventions or guidelines have been created to avoid misunderstandings and to simplify the communication between users. Chatiquette varies from community to community and generally describes basic courtesy. As an example, it is considered rude to write only in upper case, because it appears as if the user is shouting. The word "chatiquette" has been used in connection with various chat systems (e.g. Internet Relay Chat) since 1995.[6][7]
Chatrooms can produce a strong sense of online identity leading to impression of subculture.[8]
Chats are valuable sources of various types of information, the automatic processing of which is the object of chat/text mining technologies.[9]
Social criticism
Criticism of online chatting and text messaging include concern that they replace proper English with shorthand or with an almost completely new hybrid language.[10][11][12]
Writing is changing as it takes on some of the functions and features of speech. Internet chat rooms and rapid real-time teleconferencing allow users to interact with whoever happens to coexist in cyberspace. These virtual interactions involve us in 'talking' more freely and more widely than ever before.[13] With chatrooms replacing many face-to-face conversations it is necessary to be able to have quick conversation as if the person were present, so many people learn to type as quickly as they would normally speak. Critics[who?] are wary that this casual form of speech is being used so much that it will slowly take over common grammar; however, such a change has yet to be seen.
With the increasing population of online chatrooms there has been a massive growth[14] of new words created or slang words, many of them documented on the website Urban Dictionary. Sven Birkerts wrote:
"as new electronic modes of communication provoke similar anxieties amongst critics who express concern that young people are at risk, endangered by a rising tide of information over which the traditional controls of print media and the guardians of knowledge have no control on it".[15]
In Guy Merchant's journal article Teenagers in Cyberspace: An Investigation of Language Use and Language Change in Internet Chatrooms; Merchant says
"that teenagers and young people are in the leading the movement of change as they take advantage of the possibilities of digital technology, drastically changing the face of literacy in a variety of media through their uses of mobile phone text messages, e-mails, web-pages and on-line chatrooms. This new literacy develops skills that may well be important to the labor market but are currently viewed with suspicion in the media and by educationalists.[13]
Merchant also says "Younger people tend to be more adaptable than other sectors of society and, in general, quicker to adapt to new technology. To some extent they are the innovators, the forces of change in the new communication landscape."[13] In this article he is saying that young people are merely adapting to what they were given.
Software and protocols
The following are common chat programs and protocols:
- Apple Messages
- AOL Instant Messenger (AIM)
- Camfrog
- Campfire
- Gadu-Gadu
- Google Talk
- I2P-Messenger (anonymous, end-to-end encrypted im for the I2P network)
- ICQ (OSCAR)
- Internet Relay Chat (IRC)
- MUD
- Paltalk
- RetroShare (encrypted, decentralized)
- SILC
- Skype
- Talk
- Talker
- TeamSpeak (TS)
- WebChat Broadcasting System (WBS)
- Windows Live Messenger
- XMPP
- Yahoo! Messenger No longer available
Chat programs supporting multiple protocols: Template:Multicol
Web sites with browser-based chat services (also see web chat): Template:Multicol
- Cryptocat
- Convore No longer available
- eBuddy
- eXo Platform (Open Source)
- FilmOn
- Gmail
- Google+
- Hall.com
- MeBeam
- Meebo No longer available
- Mibbit
- Omegle
- Talkomatic
- Tokbox No longer available
- Tinychat
- Trillian
- Userplane
- Woo Media No longer available
- Wireclub
- Zumbl No longer available
See also
- Chat room
- Collaborative software
- Instant messaging
- List of virtual communities with more than 100 million active users
- Live support software
- Online dating service
- Real-time text
- Videotelephony
References
Citations
- ^ a b "CompuServe Innovator Resigns After 25 Years", The Columbus Dispatch, 11 May 1996, p. 2F.
- ^ a b Mike Pramik, "Wired and Inspired", The Columbus Dispatch, (Business page), 12 November 2000.
- ^ a b "IRC Chatiquette – Chat Etiquette". Livinginternet.com. 1995-11-28. Retrieved 2012-01-19.
- ^ a b "UITS - Instant Messaging Chatiquette - University of Arkansas". Uits.uark.edu. Archived from the original on 2010-06-09. Retrieved 2012-01-19.
- ^ a b Using the Internet for Active Teaching and Learning, Steven C. Mills ISBN 0-13-110546-9
- ^ a b "Electronic Discourse - On Speech and Writing on the Internet - 3. Internet Relay Chat Discourse". Epubl.luth.se. Retrieved 2012-01-19.
- ^ a b CNET reviews - comparative reviews - chat clients - chatiquette The Internet Archive
- ^ a b Regina Lynn (2007-05-04). "Virtual Rape Is Traumatic, but Is It a Crime?". Wired. Archived from the original on 2014-12-20.
- ^ a b "Texor". Yatsko's Computational Linguistics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 2014-11-01. Retrieved 2013-06-29.
- ^ a b Zimmer, Ben. Language Log: Shattering the illusions of texting, University of Pennsylvania, September 18, 2008.
- ^ a b Liberman, Mark. Language Log: Texting and language skills, University of Pennsylvania, August 2, 2012.
- ^ a b Zwicky, Arnold. Language Log: The decline of writing in Dingburg, www.aarichats.comUniversity of Pennsylvania. September 19, 2008.
- ^ a b c d Merchant, Guy . "Teenagers in cyberspace: an investigation of language use and language change in internet chatrooms." Journal of Research in Reading. 2001, Vol. 24, Iss. 3, ISSN 0141-0423.
- ^ a b Topping, Alexandra (2009-06-10). "'Web 2.0' declared millionth word in English language". The Guardian.
- ^ a b Birkerts, S. "Sense and semblence: The implications of virtuality." In B. Cox (Ed.), Literacy is not enough. Manchester: Manchester University Press. 1998
- ^ Michael Herman (2006-10-17). "Chat room user guilty of web rage". The Times. London. Retrieved 2010-05-20.