Talk:Animal law

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Plagiarism[edit]

Quite a bit of this article has been plagiarized from here, though the sentences have been jiggled around a bit. It should probably be rewritten if anyone has time. SlimVirgin talk|edits 00:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Animals need to be fed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.59.30.129 (talk) 00:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

List[edit]

Merge proposal[edit]

New stub doesn't seem to be distinct in content from this article. PamD (talk) 22:28, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

I've redirected the new one to here. SlimVirgin talk contribs 20:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Overdriving[edit]

I found this term, "overdriving" here: http://www.troyrecord.com/articles/2010/07/03/news/doc4c2ec0848b9c5295447095.txt It appears to be a crime against an animal separate or somewhat different from torture. In context, it's clear it means making an animal work too hard. A discription or history of it would be a fine addition to this article. I think it should have a short article. Chrisrus (talk) 03:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Worldwide View[edit]

I have added an Australian ref and will add refs from other jursidictionsClearTeachings (talk) 03:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Animal law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Animal law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Critique regarding Asia section[edit]

Hi Wikipedian,

I think you have a very educational page regarding Animal law that highlights many relevant factors. Although, when addressing animal law in academia I believe further can be discussed about Asia. You have introduced a course regarding the topic at KIMEP University but did not further dissect what that course entails and how it further exemplifies the ideologies on your page. I suggest to further educate you're readers about why it is relevant to include this course; it would be beneficial to include more information regarding the university, professor as well as the course itself. It is distracting due to it looking out of place considering all of the other parts of the world have a lot of information to support them. Once again, very well written, educational page; just a small critique. --CassM1155 (talk) 19:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)