Thompson language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Native toCanada, United States
RegionBritish Columbia, Washington
Ethnicity3,105 Nlaka'pamux
Native speakers
130 (2014 FPCC)[1]
Duployan shorthand (historical)
Language codes
ISO 639-3thp
ELPNłeʔkepmxcín (Thompson)
Thompson is classified as Severely Endangered by the UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger

The Thompson language, properly known as Nlaka'pamuctsin, also known as the Nlaka'pamux ('Nthlakampx') language, is an Interior Salishan language spoken in the Fraser Canyon, Thompson Canyon, Nicola Country of the Canadian province of British Columbia, and formerly in the North Cascades region of Whatcom and Chelan counties of the state of Washington in the United States. A dialect distinctive to the Nicola Valley is called Scw'exmx, which is the name of the subgroup of the Nlaka'pamux who live there.


Nlaka'pamuctsin is a consonant-heavy language. The consonants can be divided into two subgroups: obstruents, which restrict airflow, and sonorants or resonants, which do not.[2] The sonorants are often syllabic consonants, which can form syllables on their own without vowels.


Bilabial Alveolar Palatal Velar Uvular Pharyngeal Glottal
central sibilant lateral plain lab. plain lab. plain lab.
plain p t ts k q ʔ
ejective tsʼ tɬʼ kʷʼ qʷʼ
Fricative plain s ɬ ʃ x χ χʷ h
voiced z ʕ ʕʷ
glottalized ˀz ˀʕ ˀʕʷ
Sonorant plain m n l j w
glottalized ˀm ˀn ˀl ˀj ˀw


Front Central Back
nor. ret. nor. ret.
Close i ~ u
Mid e ə ~ ə̠ o
Open a

Stress is used with an acute accent; á.[3][4]

Morphology and syntax[edit]

Researchers working in the Generative tradition have speculated that Salishan languages lack lexical categories such as nouns and verbs. Evidence for such an absence of contrast between parts of speech in Nlaka'pamuctsin come from a lack of clear morphological markers (e.g. morphemes) that differentiate nouns and verbs.[5][6] Instead, generative linguists discuss morphology and syntax in Salishan based on a framework of predicates and particles.[6] However, more contemporary work suggests a changing understanding of Salishan grammar. Some Salishanists believe that functional categories are not prescriptive of lexical categories. Work in Functional linguistics suggests that other factors beyond morphological evidence code lexical categories in languages. In Salishan, the distinction would be less overt than in some other languages.[7][8]

Lexical suffixes[edit]

One morphological feature of Nlaka'pamuctsin is lexical suffixes.[6] These are words that add nuance to predicates and can be affixed to the ends of root words to add their general meaning to that word.[2] Thompson and Thompson assert that as a result of English language influence, speakers are using these more complex predicates less and less in favor of simpler predicates with complements and adjuncts, resulting in “a general decline in the exploitation of the rich synthetic resources of the language.”[2]

Suffix Suffix meaning Root Root meaning Suffixed form
꞊uyəm’xw earth, land, place; in vicinity; (earth) oven; baked goods /q’íx̣-t strong, secure /q’íx̣꞊ym’xw firm, hard ground
√c’əɬ cold /c’ɬ꞊úym’xw it is a cold country
kw[ʔá]l’ turn green /kwa[ʔ]l’꞊úym’xw the grass turns green
√c’áp ferment n/c’áp꞊ym’xw sour-dough, yeast bread
꞊ekst hand, arm √kiyèʔ ahead, in front, principal, the eldest s/kiyèʔ꞊qín'꞊kst thumb
꞊qin head
꞊xn foot, leg s/kiyèʔ꞊qín'꞊xn big toe
√k'əm focal area n/k'm꞊énk꞊xn sole of foot
꞊ene(ʔ)k belly, under side

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Thompson at Ethnologue (21st ed., 2018) closed access
  2. ^ a b c Thompson, Lawrence C.; Thompson, M. Terry (1992). The Thompson Language. University of Montana Press.
  3. ^ Koch, Karsten A. (2011). "A Phonetic Study of Intonation and Focus in Nłeʔkepmxcin (Thompson River Salish)". Prosodic Categories: Production, Perception and Comprehension. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. pp. 111–143. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0137-3_6. ISBN 978-94-007-0136-6.
  4. ^ "Nłeʔkepmxcin - Nlha7kápmx Thompson". Retrieved 2017-06-15.
  5. ^ Campbell, Lyle (1997). American Indian Languages: The Historical Linguistics of Native America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 117.
  6. ^ a b c Mithun, Marianne (1999). The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 64.
  7. ^ Haag, Marcia (October 1998). "Word-Level Evidence for Lexical Categories in Salishan Languages". International Journal of American Linguistics. 64 (4): 379–393. doi:10.1086/466367.
  8. ^ Koch, Karsten; Matthewson, Lisa (2009). "The Lexical category debate in Salish and its relevance for Tagalog". Theoretical Linguistics. 35 (1): 125–137. doi:10.1515/thli.2009.007.

External links[edit]