User talk:Akshaypillai

Welcome!

Hello, Akshaypillai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tharavad has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tharavad was changed by Akshaypillai (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906791 on 2017-02-07T08:08:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tharavad

I undid your edit to Tharavad as it was unreferenced. Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. To add a reference, please read Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Your edits are saved in the wp:page history. Please add references when you restore the content. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Illathu Nair

I have no idea where you are copying the information from but the stuff you are adding to Illathu Nair isn't in fact reliably sourced. Worse, some of it is completely unsourced and some of it (eg: the stuff where you cite Fuller) makes no sense because, for example, Fuller's article doesn't mention them. I'm pretty sure you are copying it because some of the citation formats are unusual, especially for a relatively new contributor. Please stop doing this - if you haven't actually checked the sources then you should not be using them. - Sitush (talk) 12:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You are edit warring with Sitush at Illathu Nair even though he has explained the problems with your addition. Please stop before you're blocked from editing. Bishonen | talk 15:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Boing! said Zebedee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kiryathil Nair have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. PediaPress is not a reliable source, as it reprints Wikipedia and other private and non-reliable sources, and it can not be used to support material added to Wikipedia articles. You must find a source that satisfies WP:RS and which exercises proper editorial control of content. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've also just checked the PediaPress source that you used in two articles, "Hinduism", and it says it is written "by Wikipedians" and is clearly just printed Wikipedia material. That definitely excludes it as a reliable source. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Please use four tilde characters to sign comments on talk pages. See WP:TP. If you are using four tildes, please fix your signature so it includes a link to your user or talk page. See WP:SIGLINK. If necessary, ask for assistance at WP:HELPDESK. Johnuniq (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted your section at Tharavad as it was copied from Facebook

This sort of copying material from other sources is usually a copyright violation and if repeated is likely to get you permanently blocked. Please don't do it again. Doug Weller talk 16:52, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mullappally illam, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. There are no sources on that article, and that's not a good thing. But there are established protocols for situations like these, and blanking is not normally a part of it. If the proposed deletion tag that I placed stays on there for a week without anyone removing it, the article will be deleted. — Train2104 (t • c) 06:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Islam, you may be blocked from editing. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ezhava, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Please do not lie in edit summaries. And don't remove well-sourced content without discussion anyway. Sitush (talk) 15:42, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 03:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GODHA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GODHA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:37, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GODHA

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GODHA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at GODHA. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Godha2456178.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Godha2456178.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Illathu Nair

You have already been made aware of the sanctions that are in force for the India/Pakistan etc caste topic area. Re-creating a distinct article at Illathu Nair is in contravention of the prior consensus to redirect that title to Nair. There was a discussion about that idea. I realise that you may not like the outcome but the solution is not to edit war over it but rather to open another discussion suggesting that the content be split into a distinct article again. That said, you've not shown any real evidence to suggest sufficient notability exists, so unless you can turn up several more reliable sources that discuss the subcaste in depth I am afraid that any such proposal made by you is almost certain to fail. - Sitush (talk) 15:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Your recent editing history at Illathu Nair‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 15:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]