User talk:Alexius08/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive 1 | Archive 2


Hello, Alexius08, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lyoko is Cool (talk) 05:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)



The things I wrote on the Harpsund article was not vandalism, not even subtle vandalism. The story is true and relevant, don't change things that you don't know about. Just wanted to let you know, peace and have a great day :)The Illusional Ministry (talk) 11:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC).


Be careful who and what you call vandalism. As you are a new user, you should not use the term until you are familiar with it. I just merged the four articles together per longtime discussion. Blanking the talk page was the next step, and it is not vandalism. Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 08:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your clarification on my talk page. I didn't mean to be rude earlier, and I was wrong to assume your edits were vandalism; however, it's difficult to distinguish this unless you cite sources, since verifiability is one of the core guidelines of Wikipedia and blanking of pages is generally frowned on. Regards, Alexius08 (talk) 08:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your apology. I should have left an edit summary of why I was doing what I did. I did on the article itself, but not the talkpage. Keep up the watchful eye, we need folks to watch out for real vandals. You have a good day! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 08:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Nowiki on spam IP's

Please dont place no wiki, such as this. these don't resolve to the correct domain and are used in search tracking thanks --Hu12 (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for that. I thought that link won't help. Alexius08 (talk) 03:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hetam-Garh er Guptodhon

You tagged this article with {{notenglish}}. Why? It is obviously English, even if it is not written well. The article may very well be deleted, but for other reasons. The {{notenglish}} tag is used for articles that are totally or partially written in another language, not for articles that need copyediting or other editorial attention. Cbdorsett (talk) 04:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

  • No big deal. We all make mistakes. By the way, I looked at your edit history and saw that you have made some very useful contributions, particularly in fighting vandalism. Thanks. I appreciate it, and I am sure others do, too. Keep up the good work. Let me know if you want some help finding the Wikipedia policies that define what is vandalism, what should be speedily deleted, and so on. Cbdorsett (talk) 04:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

"Autobiography" on user page

With regards to your edit on User:Gabrielle nicole10, please note that the {{db-bio}} template is only for use on articles. We allow a certain latitude for user pages per WP:USERPAGE. Thank you. Pegasus «C¦ 11:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

- DaughterofSun (talk) 16:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Template messages on user talk pages

I noticed that you have been leaving welcome messages and warning templates on user talk pages. You will want to use the subst: template substitution command on these. Don't worry about going back and subst'ing your old warnings as there is a bot that goes around and subst all the appropriate templates, but future warnings and welcomes should be left with a subst:. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

my article

Wait, first why are you canceling my article, I know you have the right too but why. My article is based on a WWE wrestler, and it's that simple. I wasted time on editing this page, and you just wanna cancel it. Give me a good reason other than that notable thing. After you reply i give you more reasons.. buddy9391 (talk) 04:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

This diff

Hi Alexius, sorry to bother you, but I just noticed the diff above. To me, it seems rather angry and might violate WP:CIVIL. Also, it seems the edit the IP address made seems to me not racially motivated; it simply removed a statement (which, agreed, is cited and should be in the article) saying that Iraq was responsible for the seige, which doesn't seem like "anti-Iraqi sentiment" to me. Furthermore, posting a "final warning" (which assumes bad faith) to the IP's talk page is sort of overkill. Having the edit summary in ALL CAPS (the wiki equivalent of shouting loudly) might sound a little scary to a new user and could potentially drive off a contributor. No need to get worked up - just warn the user and move on. From a fellow XP user, GlobeGores (talk page | user page) 00:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Removing other people's comments

Please don't remove other people's comments (though they are exeptions), if you think that the user should be warned with a higher level, just add it after the precceding warning. You shouldn't use agressive edit summaries, even if the user you're refering acts like a "vandal", it's uncivil. Finally, a 4im coupled with an agressive edit summary is likely to encourage the user to keep vandalizing, which we don't want. CenariumTalk 15:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello, Maybe the Reason for My Edit Was Not Too Obvious...

Hello, Alex. I see that you're new to Wikipedia. Perhaps I should convey a few lines as per this edit which you undone, which I've already reversed.

Wikipedia is not a game guide where you can see spoilers and things like that. Look at the article in question. How does it help make the article a better one? As far as I can see, it doesn't at all. The space it takes up on Wikipedia can be put to better use. If any one wants to have some kind of spoiler, they can either search for such spoilers on the Internet or go out and buy some real game guides. They should not be posting or viewing such material on Wikipedia.

On an unrelated note, are you on Recent Changes patrol? Your edits are pretty random to me (which I usually take to mean that the editor in question patrols Recent Changes). I like your edit summaries, but keep in mind about WP:CIVIL WP:DENY. I did this some time back and got a little warning as a result. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 23:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


Well that was my page and I did it on purpose and it is April 1st - random things happens on wikipeida on that day Af648 06:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Cleanup templates

Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "{{Unreferenced}}", "{{Fact}}" and , "{{advert}}" etc., are best not "subst"ed . See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 11:51 1 April 2008 (GMT).


Why did you revert my trivia edit to Lord of War? --Climax Void . —Preceding comment was added at 15:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipediholism Test

To your deletion of the 28 hours: Actually, the entire question included Krypton was destroyed. This was a reference to Superman, where the planet he comes from, Krypton, has 28 hours.

O—— The Unknown Hitchhiker 04:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Inappropriate speedy tag on User:Paul Gard/Hoodong

Hello. I declined your speedy deletion tagging of User:Paul Gard/Hoodong under CSD G11 because it is a userspace draft. Users are free to work on prospective articles in their userspace at their own pace, and prepare them before sending them into the mainspace. Unless the page in question truly constitutes something that would be deletable under the speedy deletion criteria (attack page, pure advertising, etc.), then deletion is not appropriate. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 08:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Also this user keeps on restoring an old version of my talk page. -- Paul Gard (talk) 08:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
With respect to the User:Paul Gard/Hoodong page, this was first an English translation of the Chinese Wikipedia version, and then I started to expand it. Thanks. -- Paul Gard (talk) 08:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
To Alexius, users are free to blank warnings and like material from their talk pages as they see fit, as it is assumed they read it. Any further attempts to edit war on his talk page to keep the warnings will not be looked on kindly. Regards, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 19:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


You are an idiot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 19:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Walter Day

I was just examining the edits that you reverted as vandalism. I believe Walter made those himself. And while it's a problem that he's written his own unsourced bio, I do think he intended those changes. Note, for example, that the material on Iron Man that he deleted he had moved to the article on Twin Galaxies. If you don't mind, I may go ahead and restore those edits -- recognizing, of course, that overall this bio is a bit problematic. TimidGuy (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Please give me a break. Did you even check to see what I reverted? If that doesn't constitute petty bitching, I'm not sure what does. "We also added new cameras all over the school so that the students have on privacy. the students have no freedoms and we confinscate all phones and ipods and keep them so the kids cant have them back." Matt Deres (talk) 02:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:Vandalism information

Excuse me, but your recent edits to Template:Vandalism information seem to be a little strange. A single occurrence of vandalism does not constitute high levels of vandalism across the site. Please use more judgement whilst editing this template. Thank you. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 06:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Mary Turner

Good afternoon! I came here to find about Mary Turner, the lynched black woman. It appears that she was certainly articleworthy - I've found contemporary journal articles, columns and history tests that attest to that. Unfortunately I'm in the midst of exam season and my knowledge of American history is minmal; as you've already looked into the subject, would you be interested in improving the article? --Kizor 10:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Decline speedy delete of User:Toneation

I declined this speedy as we don't normally delete user pages. Why did you request its deletion? --JodyB talk 11:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

It had conflict of interest. Also, that contained a link to his company, rendering it as blatant advertising. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

re: User:Timorese Politics

I found the username to be a:

Misleading usernames imply relevant, misleading things about the contributor. For example, misleading points of fact, an impression of undue authority, or the suggestion that the account is operated by a group, project or collective rather than one individual.

in that it would imply the person is advocating for Timorese politics or is an expert on them or is a representative of them. MBisanz talk 03:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

HA HA!!!!!

Your nomination for deletion for my user page got rejected you're a retard!!! Go kill your self you moron! You'll never be an admin because you're so fucking stupid!!!!London39 (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G7)

I see you just posted "Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G7)" on a user talk page. You may not be aware of it, but that CSD reason only applies to pages with a single author. The page in question has had multiple authors.[1] ·:· Will Beback ·:· 07:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Levity Heaven

I think that we're required to prod the article before listing it as an AfD candidate, no? In any case, it saves time and effort. J Readings (talk) 13:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


This is obviously a test page and a copy of Universal Standard Book Code. I thought of redirecting it, but because it is all capitalised and starts with the word "the" I decided not to. Regards LittleOldMe (talk) 11:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


I created that page on purpose, I am going to list statistics on that site, do not delete it --DelilahC (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Endz The Otherness

Just a quick friendly note on Endz The Otherness. "Ghits" in the prod reasoning was intentional. It's a common wiki abbreviation for google hits. No biggie, just letting you know.--Fabrictramp (talk) 13:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Obsolete move protection template

Oops, I temporarily deleted my user page the other day to get rid of some nasty vandalism, and it looks like that cleared out the protection. I've reinstated it, thanks for the heads-up. Hersfold (t/a/c) 21:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit

Though you took out my edit, it's all good. Let's make this small. However, I placed a fart - related suggestion here. Please don't take it out, since the artist who did the "rare drawing" of a man breaking wind was done by Jose Rizal, according to an Ambeth R. Ocampo book (Aguinaldo's Breakfast and other Looking Back Essays, page 221; first published 1993, sixth printing 2004). Thanks in advance. -iaNLOPEZ1115 · TaLKBaCK · Vandalize it 11:13, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: #Redirect ((BUMMMFITCHH)) tagged for rapid deletion

Hi. Yes, I was working on that as part of a new article with a tricky spelling. Presumably your robot got in before I had a chance to correct it.

I say, you seem like a knowledgeable chap : how do you insert a crosslink from an article to a category? If you put in ((Category:xxx) it applies the category to the whole article without displaying the link. Currently, I've got a '#Redirect ((Category:xxx))' article with the same name as the category, and it looks a bit dodgy. Cheers! Neuralwarp (talk) 11:16, 16 May 2008 (UTC)


Just FYI, a clone of User:StatusBot is now active and operational, using the same infrastructure. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 13:39, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Kitchen Bar

Hi. Thanks for your contribution to the Kitchen Bar AfD discussion. I'm a bit confused by your comment that there's no assertion of notability because the article now has four media references, including a whole article in The Observer and a BBC feature. It states here that "A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability". The article would seem to meet those criteria to me. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Mary White (ceramicist and calligrapher)

I note that you tagged this article for speedy deletion, within 2 minutes of its first save and while the creator was still actively working on it. You may be interested in recent discussions on this topic at user talk:Orangemike (Topics LNWR 2-2-2 3020 Cornwall & others and Convoy SC-143)

The problem is that this article certainly doesn't merit speedy deletion, even in the state it has reached a couple of hours later. The cause is that many editors use wikipedia as their editing scratchpad - the first save may be no more than a line or two long. This isn't a good article, but it's going to become one. That's a long way from the "My classmate is a ..." stuff that really merits instant deletion.

Having observed a number of new-article patrollers who've gone down this route, and had to do a bunch of legwork myself to recover promising articles, I'd ask that anyone thinking of tagging like this (when it's not obvious garbage) to please watch and wait for a while before assuming that's as far as the article's ever going to move unprompted. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

my RfA - Ta!

Gwen gleans, wending keen by the wikirindle.

Thanks for supporting my RfA, which went through 93/12/5. I'll be steadfast in this trust the en.Wikipedia community has given me. Cheers! Gwen Gale (talk) 01:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Hammasa Kohistani

Hello. That other user used this source to claim she is Pashtun/Uzbek:

This is a comment on an internet forum. That is not a reliable source. In her own interview with BBC Persian she said her ethnicity clearly which was Tajik. Ibrahimzai (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 00:56, 26 May 2008 (UTC) (UTC).

I listened to the interview on youtube (supposedly recorded from BBC persian news) and question regarding her ethnic background was not asked. She mentioned that her parents are both "Afghans", meaning citizens of Afghanistan. The man asks her where in Afghanistan do you (or parents) come from and she says from the "Tajik-area", refering to northeastern area of Afghanistan where most Tajiks live. However, there are not only Tajiks living there but small pockets of other ethnic groups including Pashtuns. The BBC English site says her father's name is "Khushal" and that is clearly non-Tajik name for sure. Khushal is a very popular name among ethnic Pashtuns. See Khushal Khan Khattak. Also, is more reliable than someone placing POV in her article about her being Tajik. If it qualify's as unreliable then it may be removed.-- (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Pashtun people

I removed Farhad Darya because he is not a Pashtun, please see his article. Ibrahimzai (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 01:02, 26 May 2008 (UTC) (UTC).

But his father is Pashtun. Read the article further. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 01:04, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, but that does not make him Pashtun. If someone's father is Irish and their mother Italian that does not mean they are Irish, etc. Also, Farhad Darya sings more Persian songs than Pashto songs. Ibrahimzai (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 01:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC) (UTC).
Please do not help this vandal remove "Farhad Darya" from Pashtun people article. The reason Darya is added in that article is because he is popular PASHTO SINGER. If he was Jamaican and his ethnic background was African and sang Pashto songs he still would be added because the section deals with people who sing Pashto songs. It does not deal with ethnic background.
Farhad Darya's father is Pashtun and that's mentioned in many articles about him but his mother being Tajik is something very new, it needs to be verified and that writings this vandal shows is not verifiable because it's missing a link to the source. Anyone can makeup fake sources here and this vandal has been doing it alot. Most people marry their own kind in Afghanistan, meaning Pashtun marry Pashtun but in rare cases they marry others. To say his father is Pashtun and mother a Tajik, you need to provide convincing evidence to back that claim. By the way the vandal is Tajik, and a very anti-Pashtun. If you see Pashtun article history he comes under many sockpuppets and vandalise it. He even removes Zalmay Khalilzad image because he doesn't want Pashtuns' image to look good to the westerners. Anyway he just got indef blocked for being a another sockpuppet of banned User:Beh-nam. -- (talk) 12:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Flying stone

Please don't nominate new users' user pages for deletion just for expressing an unusual philosophy, as you did with User:Flying stone. As of this writing, Flying stone has been a registered Wikipedia editor for less than 3 hours, yet you requested speedy deletion of his user page one minute after they created it and less than 1 hour after they registered. If Flying stone had posted that content in the mainspace, it would indeed have been speedily deletable. But trying to speedily delete that content from his user page constitutes biting the new users. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 22:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Help! Please unblock my IP!


Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of lifted or expired.

Request handled by: slakrtalk / 13:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Huggy Wuggy Speedy Deletion

Thanks for your concern, but this has been resolved between me and an admin. Smuckers (talk) 14:34, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Main page warning?

Erm yes, I was quite aware of that edit. My account was compromised, see my talk page. I don't think the warning was necessary, since I'm not a new user... — Malcolm (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Your changes to List of Programming Languages


I reverted your changes and added sources explaining why the entries you removed are in fact fitting to the article. If you do not agree please let me know and we can discuss. Thanks for taking the time to edit Wikipedia! --Ubardak (talk) 08:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the reply. Feel free to create an article on H - it sounds notable with many sources. --Ubardak (talk) 02:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Your note

Regarding your page, I sent you an e-mail about it yesterday. Best, SlimVirgin talk|edits 03:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

PLUM keyboard

I see you tagged PLUM keyboard as having its factual accuracy disputed back in May. I'd agree the article needs a lot of work, but could you clarify what that particular issue is on the article's talk page? Thanks. Vquex (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Just moved the page to PLUM keyboard, tidying redirects. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:30, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


See explanation to small edit made to Aporia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 04:21, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


Removing my edit was fair enough, but you should allow me to delete the last sentence about the shop being famous for selling real fur cats as this is untrue, and unsourced, and you insistence on revising the edit including it when it is obviously vandalism is baffling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:01, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


Hi, I've rewritten Pinoy and would appreciate you revisiting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinoy to see if your concerns have been addressed. Banjeboi 02:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Tithe Maps

Is it not appropriate to provide a link to this free-to use service which provides examples of the maps discussed on this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:54, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Images of Buddha

Alexius08, I don't believe you should have removed the link I just added to a worldwide collection of images of Buddha. This is a link to a legitimate resource of more than 500 examples of how images of Buddha are displayed in contemporary culture worldwide. This is a unique collection that is intended to inform and educate, and not to promote a website or to add a meaningless list of links. It documents an ongoing cultural phenomenon that is relevant to a discussion of Buddhism. Please reconsider. Jim Casper (talk) 12:49, 11 September 2008 (UTC) Jim Casper

Edit to section Platform tennis

Links added were relevant. According to is the most visited site for platform tennis[2].

I updated links to hall of fame because is a redirect to a site you already have listed. is also a relevant link to this category. Please undo your changes. Bobconsidine (talk) 12:58, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Sectional Charts

I added a link to (another legitimate sectional chart source)...why was it removed? Why does skyvector get to be up there, but other sites that might offer something different need to be removed? Felixtcpip (talk) 13:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Your userboxes....

College student at 13??? Lucifer (Talk) 20:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes. I got accelerated from the sixth grade two years ago. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 08:29, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


Barnstar of Reversion2.png The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I'm proud to give Alexius08 this barnstar for the great job of cleaning up vandalism on the Hamilton, Ontario article!  Nhl4hamilton | Chit-Chat  22:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Can you help me with the layout of my user page?

Your user page looks so cool. How do I make my user page look cool? Can you help me? --Questionables (talk) 10:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion request

why do you believe it was the author doing this? WilyD 11:20, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if I mistook it. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Your recent reversion

Your recent reversion of Chatsworth, Los Angeles, California seems counter-productive. Please explain it at Talk:Chatsworth, Los Angeles, California#Discuss reasons for reversion here Thanks. (talk) 02:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC).

Sorry if I mistook it. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 02:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Just noticed that you replied at my talk page...I didn't think to look there until now since the {{ambox}} at the top of your talk page says you would reply at the location I requested in order to "prevent thread fragmentation"...If you don't intend to reply at the talk page I mentioned earlier I guess I'll do it for you. Should I blame the mistaken reversion on an itchy Wikipedia:Huggle-trigger finger? :-) (talk) 03:13, 14 September 2008 (UTC).
Perhaps. I was a bit hurrying then. Anyway, I'll be careful next time. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 11:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


Regarding your question on the literal string "gism", it's slang for semen. Didn't want to leave your question unanswered! Shereth 15:16, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Competition Cams Article

  • Comment - The Competition Cams article has been completely rewritten and re-cited with new, more credible sources. I urge each of the editors that has previously voted against the articles notability, neutrality, etc. to please reconsider.

--Jabarke1 (talk) 19:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Please slow down

Please slow down. You are making an awful lot of mistakes. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 09:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

One more misuse of the rollback tool and I'll remove it. mkay? -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
What particular misuse? Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 10:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Bongwarrior, Władysław Sikorski, Quentin Wilson, and several others. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Author blanking

Hello, if the article creators blank their page after it being tagged for speedy deletion, as e.g. for Samanites that should not be reverted as it essentially amounts to them agreeing with the deletion in the sense of WP:CSD#G7.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:55, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Your signature

Your current signature, Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions, is somewhat misleading, you may consider changing it. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay. I've trimmed it down to minimize the number of bytes. Alexius08 (talk) 08:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Replied on my talk. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 08:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Wigan Warriors

You recently reverted one of my edits in order to re-insert a huge section of blatant advertising inserted by someone with a very obvious name. The resulting edits have left the article factually incorrect. In 2007 Wigan Warriors did play in a BLACK kit. (talk) 13:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

User: Vandalism

I see you've warned User: several times about vandalism. It struck again recently on Beluga (whale), Elephant Seal, Talk:Blue Whale and Talk:Beluga (whale). I reverted the vandalism, but not sure how to handle escalating the warnings to a block. I suppose I can go to AN/I but figured I'd check with you first. Rlendog (talk) 17:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Try giving him a 4im. After striking again within three days, you can go report him. Alexius08 (talk) 23:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


Is this where I can discuss the brickfilms entry on WIKI ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talkcontribs) 01:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Please discuss it on the relevant talk page. Alexius08 (talk) 01:55, 4 October 2008 (UTC)