User talk:Astorknlam

This user may have left Wikipedia. Astorknlam has not edited Wikipedia since April 21, 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Astorknlam, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Please read WP:BAI. Writing very short articles about your family is generally considered to be a bad idea. If they are famous, please include that fact in the article and let us know why that is. Being part of a fictional dynasty is not considered famous. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:35, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

I moved Son of Lams Family since 1992 to your user space: User:Astorknlam/Son of Lams Family since 1992. In article space it will soon be deleted anyway. Uppland 12:16, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot write an article about yourself with only the places you were educated at. You can have that information on your user page, however. Academic Challenger 09:44, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Prince Waldemar (1868-1879).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Prince Waldemar (1868-1879).jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much.

P.S. As the stock message above mentions check your other images too, I've tagged them as "no source" too, you can find them quickly on your list of contributions. Thanks again. --Sherool 12:21, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Info on image, please[edit]

Please go to Image:Yeoh.jpg and edit that image description page to give the source (URL, if online; ISBN, if scanned from a book; and if you've taken the image yourself, just say so) and the licensing status (the list of image copyright tags might be useful) of this image. All our images should have this information; images without source or license info will be deleted after seven days. Thank you. Lupo 10:24, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also all your other image uploads. Lupo 10:28, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:100 0526.JPG has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:100 0526.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Bash 21:55, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Carnival (25).jpg has been listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Carnival (25).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Bash 22:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Birthday![edit]

User:Jenmoa/birthday --User:Jenmoa 01:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- Just have to wish you a Belated Happy Birthday. Saw you editing some of the Belgian royals, checked out your page and noticed your birthday. Same day as mine (10/19/1977). So HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!! Prsgoddess187 16:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ex Romanian Royals[edit]

If you put those silly boxes in the Romanian pages again I will report you for vandalism. Adam 12:40, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

layout changes[edit]

Why are you changing the layout of all the pages of Dutch royal family? The pages are much clearer with the boxes on the right. Baszoetekouw 13:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that having both boxes on the right isn't ideal either, but the main body text of the article is most important and should be on the most prominent place: the top left of the screen. Baszoetekouw 13:14, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if an individual is included in a Royal Family template, please don't add the dynastic templates to the page as well because it makes it all look a big old mess. Thanks Craigy

(talk) 17:10, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove templates on styles from articles. They are a format agreed by consensus to be used. Any removals will be reverted on sight. The layout of royal pages was decided by debate and has a consensus behind them. All changes that breach that consensus, such as moving a royal family template to the left, and the insertion of a 'house of . . . ' template on current monarchs pages, and the moving of the main picture to the left, will be reverted on sight. Please follow the agreed conventions on page layout. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 19:25, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Greek Royals[edit]

We use the Greek Royal Family Template for those royals still living. We only use the House template for deceased members. This is the common approach on royalty articles in Wikiepdia. I've therefore reverted your changes made this morning. This is the best approach since only using a House template would mean missing out the consorts of princes and kings. Astrotrain 16:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Advice: Royalty pages

Wikipedia follows a strict formula for royal pages, in terms of content, layout and naming.

The basic rules are:

All monarchs and princes/ses birth/family are named using highest ranking title; eg, King Edward VIII not the Duke of Windsor.

Styles are not used in articles. A style box is always used.

The image goes on the top right hand side of all pages.

For past monarchs and their children, the royal house template is used.

For current monarchs and their descendants, the royal family template is used.

Both templates are never used together.

Because many articles are quite small, with the text sometimes smaller than one template, the royal house template for both houses is not used. Instead only the template of the senior parent (ie, whichever was the monarch, not the consort) is used.

A royal consort has the template of the royal family they marry into, not of the family they were born into, on their page. However once they die, their birth family template replaces the marital royal family template.

With thousands of articles on royalty, and hundreds of contributors to them, the same standard format needs to be used across each article.

Any inadvertent content, layout or naming that does not match that format is deleted to restore the article to the agreed format.

For full details on royal naming rules, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)

Strong advice: Royal articles

You have already been informed that you are breaking the agreed format in royal pages. All changes that do that will be reverted on sight. Such actions can be seen by Wikipedians as vandalism. Stop doing it.

FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 02:23, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Line of Succession of Lam[edit]

Could you clean these up or delete them? Articles are not supposed to point to User: areas. Fplay 03:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lai laifong and Lam Singtim[edit]

Two articles you started have been nominated for speedy deletion because of their lack of context. NickelShoe 03:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Liechtenstein changes[edit]

I've expanded the Princely Family of Liechtenstein page with a lot of basic biographical info, as well as the images of the Princely Standard and the hrhstyles infobox, and I've removed that type of info from most of the individual pages and linked them to the family page. A lot of the minor members' articles (those which had no content beyond what's now on on the family page) have just become redirects to the family page, which is now the hub for all the pages on the present royal family Colonies Chris 23:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:D4_1_1_image3.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:D4_1_1_image3.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 04:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Mathilde.jpg[edit]

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mathilde.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 11:42, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Norway-olaf5.jpg[edit]

Hi Astorknlam, thanks for uploading this image. However, it has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 January 20 and will be deleted shortly unless you add an apropriate copyright tag. --Duk 05:51, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images on user pages[edit]

Please note that fair use images may not be used on user pages - please see Wikipedia:Fair use. Please would you therefore remove any such images from your user page? Thanks, CLW 22:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you don't seem to be editing here at the moment, I'll remove the content. CLW 15:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

courtesy titles[edit]

Courtesy titles like "Earl of Ulster" are not preceded by "The". I know it looks weird, but the form is hardly ever used in practice; he'd normally be called "Lord Ulster". —Tamfang 10:00, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Nite04.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Nite04.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WonYong (talk) 00:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Karl1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Karl1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 21:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:King_romania_1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:King_romania_1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

greetings[edit]

I'm new here so I thought I'd introduce myself to some of the people here--Chapline R Vine^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 23:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ali bin Al Hussein[edit]

I noticed that you moved Ali bin Al Hussein three times in February. What was the reason? - Nat Krause^(Talk!) 06:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Maria da Gloria of Orleans-Braganca[edit]

There's some odd characters in the first line of your edit (new article). I don't want to muck it up as I don't know what's right, but it doesn't appear to be correct. --Geneb1955^Talk/_CVU 07:20, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Qing Nobility[edit]

I'm sorry to inform you that your edits and movements on the articles regarding Qing Dynasty nobility is deemed unconventional by Wikipedia Convention. It is advised that you move the articles back to where they belong after you've read the document. Thank you. Colipon+(T) 05:08, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Source needed[edit]

Hi, in order to keep Image:Albert2belgium-7.jpg we need both the actual copyright holder (monarchy? news agency?), and a fair use rationale. Stan 12:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Andrea_2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrea_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Org09.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Org09.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Connections[edit]

Regards from a person in Chile who has the same thinking of you on politics and about persons to be interested in (Albert II, Queen Victoria, etc, etc, etc).

Ple go to http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Gonzaloluengo to reply me.

RE: I don't know[edit]

Hello:

I'm talking about the intersts and ideas you show on your user webpage. I just want to say that I shre with you many of your interests and ideas.

Regards,

Gonzalo A. Luengo O. (you can leave messages in English in my discussion page without problems)

Fair use rationale for Image:Andreaandcharlotte.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Andreaandcharlotte.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Consort"[edit]

Hi, could you please see my question at Talk:Carol_II_of_Romania#"Consort"? I think this came in on your edit. - Jmabel | Talk 23:40, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Information on images[edit]

I see that you uploaded the images Image:Marie-Adélaïde.jpg and Image:LaGrande-DuchesseCharlotte.jpg (the latter of which has recently been deleted). Although their use was justified by having 'permission granted', this is not a valid justification for inclusion by itself. Thus, to allow Wikipedia to use such images, permission has to be proven. If you have evidence of this permission, for use in a commercial manner, that can be used to justify their use and to justify one re-uploading the image that has been deleted. Otherwise, one must cite them as qualifying only under Fair Use, which places certain constraints on the use of the images. Bastin 22:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:A01.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:A01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 04:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use image removed from your user page[edit]

Hello, Astorknlam. I've removed Image:A01.jpg from User:Astorknlam/Userbox, as it is a copyrighted image that is being used under a claim of fair use. Unfortunately, by Wikipedia policies, no fair-use images can be used on user pages; please see the ninth item of the Wikipedia fair-use policy and Wikipedia:Removal of fair use images. This image has not been deleted from any articles. If you have any questions, please let me know. —Bkell (talk) 04:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

The use of copyrighted fair use images on your user page is a copyright violation. Please remove all of this type of image as soon as possible to protect Wikipedia from copyright infringement issues. -Thanks Nv8200p talk 13:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Francis II.jpg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Francis II.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kevin_b_er 18:29, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Birthday Committee![edit]

Welcome, Astorknlam, to the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!!! You have met all of the membership requirements. Any concerns should be directed to Steveo2. (Between June 14 and September 10, 2006, speak to Mr. Turcotte instead.) See the Birthday Committee Project Page to see our userbox, and the Birthday Message Templates. Go to the bulletin board to see any new announcements concerning the committee. Remember, Be Bold!

Thanks for joining! Don't hesitate to ask me any questions that you may have. Happy editing! Thisthema n 17:06, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:AstridE2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AstridE2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!!![edit]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Astorknlam, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Cheers! The RSJ _{300 million and} _{still going strong!} 23:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Me too!!!

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Astorknlam, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Image:Jwong scs.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jwong scs.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 06:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Birgittasweden1937-14.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Birgittasweden1937-14.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 05:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the image also lacks a detailed fair use rationale, see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria. Sincerely, --Oden 05:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerely, --Oden 08:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

proposed to delete[edit]

I decided to prod princess Marija of Yugoslavia. ObRoy 13:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bhutan[edit]

Hi! Please join us! Chris 01:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images on user pages[edit]

User:Astor Lam/Yoko Ono is full of fair use images, which cannot be used on user pages. Please could you remove them? Thanks, CLW 08:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've carried on editing User:Astor Lam/Yoko Ono, but haven't removed the fair use images. Please see WP:FAIR, and please remove these images. Thanks, CLW 11:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tung Chee Hwa[edit]

I noticed you edited out 'The Honourable' off his name. Just to let you know he is entitled to use 'The Honourable' not only because he's one of the Vice Chairman of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, but also because he was awarded with the GBM medal.

--Cahk 08:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Image:29zzz.jpeg[edit]

Please note that fair use images are not permitted on user pages under any circumstances. See WP:FUC for additional information. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rklawton (talk • contribs) 16:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Faye Wong category[edit]

Hi Astor, thanks for setting up Category:Faye Wong - nice idea! I have added pages for her films and for other influential people in her life into the new category. - Fayenatic london (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added Tony Leung Chui Wai because he was her co-star in all her successful films, Chungking Express, Chinese Odyssey 2002 and 2046. (I don't count Leaving me loving you as successful.) Little Tony remains a significant friend as evidenced by his donation to the Smileangel Foundation, mentioned at the end of Faye's biography. I'll add a hidden explanation in-line on the Tony Leung page. - Fayenatic london (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might like to join the forum at wongfaye.org, where fans share news, pictures & occasional downloads. - Fayenatic london (talk) 08:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EAVPOH.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:EAVPOH.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 19:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stephaniemonaco189.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stephaniemonaco189.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paola.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paola.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 22:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actor infobox[edit]

HI Astorknlam. I am the guy who crated WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. I was just wondering is there anyway we can set the default colour of the Actor info box as Silver - I beleive it looks more stylish. I have been using silver on deceased actors. What do you think? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 10:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest we stick to using silver for deceased actors and gold for living, ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 10:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why wouldn't they like silver? Its not as if it is a lurid intoxicating green or bright pink or something. I guess some people have been accustomed to the gold but it isn't really gold it is an off yellow. It's not really important but I want the articles to look as attractive as possible, ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 10:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winona Ryder[edit]

Is there any reason for getting rid of the Academy awards and BAFTA awards boxes at the bottom of that article? It seems funny to me, but I don't wanna revert it again if there is a reason for getting rid of them. Bsroiaadn^Talk 13:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

Please be more careful when editing infoboxes; stop removing contents from infoboxes as you did here, here and here; please don't remove unused fields; just because they're not presently used, doesn't meant they won't be needed, and finally, please use edit summaries to tell others what you have carried out. BertieBasset 16:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Venue suggestion needed for a meet-up in Yuen Long[edit]

Dear: Astorknlam ：

In the past meet-ups, we always had our meeting in the centre of Kowloon, either Kowloon Tong or Mong Kok. However, apart from these places, I am sure that alternative venues in other region would be suitable.

This is the time for your suggestion! According to some discussion on Chinese Wikipedia, from August of 2007, the Hong Kong Wikimedians’ meet-up would be held in all districts of Hong Kong in a circulation basis.

Here is the tentative information of the first meet-up：

Date：11, August, 2007 (Saturday)

Time：After 5:00pm

Proposed region：Yuen Long

The community would request for ideas of where we should hold the meet-up , in order to have a better decision. If you have any good ideas, don’t hesitate to give your opinions, million thanks!

Please don't hesitate to give your good suggestion to us

Regards,

Hong Kong Wikimedian

Sith lord darth vader

04:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Diane Keaton[edit]

Template:Diane Keaton has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Black Falcon ^(Talk) 00:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Johann Adam Andreas.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Johann Adam Andreas.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Karl Eusebius.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Karl Eusebius.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ossie Davis[edit]

Hi. Could you offer your opinion on the discussion on the Ossie Davis Talk Page? Thanks. Nightscream 16:49, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of longest reigning monarchs of all time[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of longest reigning monarchs of all time, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest reigning monarchs of all time. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:14, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Egyptian Royal Family[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Egyptian Royal Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alois I.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alois I.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alois I.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alois I.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Alois II.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alois II.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Anton Florian.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Anton Florian.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Johann II.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Johann II.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:28, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:R.E.M._ep_cover_2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:R.E.M._ep_cover_2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 08:17, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:R.E.M. ep cover 1.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R.E.M. ep cover 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:R.E.M. ep cover 2.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R.E.M. ep cover 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:24, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Franz I.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz I.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Johann I.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Johann I.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Franz Josef I.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Franz Josef I.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday[edit]

Hey, Astorknlam. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!-- Vatsan34 (talk) 07:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Astorknlam! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Princess Alia bint Al Hussein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Princess Raiyah bint Al Hussein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Princess Maria da Gloria, Duchess of Segorbe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Prince Nikolas of Yugoslavia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Yuzhan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Susan Tse - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paulgreece.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paulgreece.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Dudley1.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Dudley1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Karahui.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Karahui.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:SCAG[edit]

Template:SCAG has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 00:18, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:I AM CHILAM 2nd Version.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:I AM CHILAM 2nd Version.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:04, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Starting from Today.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starting from Today.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Starting from Today 2nd Version.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Starting from Today 2nd Version.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:52, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joe T. L. Chan[edit]

The article Joe T. L. Chan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP that fails notability per WP:ACADEMIC with no claim of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michaela den (talk) 13:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mon his charlesregent high.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mon his charlesregent high.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rainier 3.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rainier 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Stefano.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Stefano.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Beautiful Faces.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Beautiful Faces.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:File-What is Love 2011.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:File-What is Love 2011.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:48, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:I AM CHILAM.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:I AM CHILAM.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:49, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tang Ti-sheng[edit]

Hi, its been a while since you created the page for him. Care to share where you got that name in English? This does not match any current versions. According to these sources,

Thanks for the information. 207.102.255.36 (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Longest-reigning emperors in China[edit]

The article Longest-reigning emperors in China has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is already a "List of rulers of China" page. In the wiki to explore who is the longest is an original study, unless there are several academic studies.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. O1lI0 (talk) 22:41, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Longest-reigning emperors in China for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Longest-reigning emperors in China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longest-reigning emperors in China until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. O1lI0 (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2009 TVB Anniversary Awards for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009 TVB Anniversary Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 TVB Anniversary Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. B dash (talk) 07:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Here's to you on your birthday, Astorknlam! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!--PATH SLOPU 03:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:36, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Katarina of Yugoslavia[edit]

The article Princess Katarina of Yugoslavia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Obscure member of deposed royal house.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prince Nikola of Yugoslavia (born 1958)[edit]

The article Prince Nikola of Yugoslavia (born 1958) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Problematic article, notability queried 6 years ago.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prince Nikola of Yugoslavia (born 1958) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prince Nikola of Yugoslavia (born 1958) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prince Nikola of Yugoslavia (born 1958) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 12:30, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Line of succession to the former Bavarian throne for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Line of succession to the former Bavarian throne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Bavarian throne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TompaDompa (talk) 14:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Line of succession to the former Greek throne for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Line of succession to the former Greek throne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Greek throne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TompaDompa (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Katarina of Yugoslavia has been nominated for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 18:50, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:TPD[edit]

Template:TPD has been nominated for merging with Template:The Princess Diaries. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ★Trekker (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Princess Maria da Glória, Duchess of Segorbe[edit]

The article Princess Maria da Glória, Duchess of Segorbe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability made, Wikipedia is not a genealogy site and the titles she claims were abolished well before she was even born.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Princess Maria da Glória, Duchess of Segorbe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Maria da Glória, Duchess of Segorbe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Maria da Glória, Duchess of Segorbe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

VocalIndia (talk) 03:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday![edit]

Just a happy birthday message to you, Astorknlam, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:22, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]