User talk:Brianis19

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Brianis19/Parks and Recreation (season 5) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parks and Recreation (season 5), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 05:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Farine. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 2012–13 United States network television schedule without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Farine (talk) 05:43, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Farine (talk) 15:09, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Parks and Recreation (season 5)

Hello Brianis19. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Parks and Recreation (season 5).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parks and Recreation (season 5)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Beerest355 Talk 13:48, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in America's Got Talent, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 01:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Snooki & Jwoww episodes

Hi. Thanks for adding material to the List of Snooki & Jwoww episodes article. However, in the course of your edit, you also removed a citation that was already in the article. The new citation you added does not include any mention of the April 25 date on which the third season was first announced, so there was no reason to remove that citation.

In addition, that earlier source was cited twice in the article. By removing the first citation of it, which included all the publication info, you created a citation error in the References section of the article, which you can see here. Sources that are cited more than once in the article use the ref name citation tag, so if you see a citation with a ref name tag, such as the one you removed, it means that it's being used multiple times in the article, and removing the first citation of it, which is usually the one that contains the full publication info, will result in such an error. Similarly, you can learn how to use the ref name tag here, so that you don't have to write out the url of the new source you're citing. It would also be appreciated if you include the rest of the publication info, at least in your first citation of that source, such as author, date, name of publication, etc.

Also, please understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and should be written with care taken in adhering to basic principles of writing. Phrases like "for a 12 episodes" are not appropriate.

Lastly, a minor point, but spaces do not go in front of citations, as indicated by WP:PAIC.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 16:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello Brianis19, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to The Crazy Ones has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from press releases: http://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/releases/print?id=36763 and http://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/releases/view?id=36858 Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:11, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Millers (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from press releases: http://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/the-millers/releases/view?id=36876 and http://www.cbspressexpress.com/cbs-entertainment/shows/the-millers/releases/view?id=36724 Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Blacklist (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from press release: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings/20130927nbc04/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 13:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Blacklist (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from press release: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings/20131011nbc04/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 08:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Biggest Loser: Second Chances 2 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from elsewhere, such as: http://www.tvguide.com/celebrities/jay-sheets/592658 and http://www.nbc.com/schedule Logical Fuzz (talk) 08:10, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Snooki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hey Mama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emma Slater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charleston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 United States network television schedule may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;margin-right:0;text-align:center"
colspan="2"|''[[Primetime (TV series)|Primetime: What Would You Do?]]''<small>(12/3)</small><ref>{{cite web|url=http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/2013/11/11/what-would-you-do-to-air-tuesdays-at-10pm-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Family Guy (season 12), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Sheridan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Your addition to The Millers has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary text copied word-for-word from press release: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings/20140210cbs05/ Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to About a Boy (TV series) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from elsewhere, such as: http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/tv/about-a-boy/EP01738426?aid=zap2it Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Growing Up Fisher has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from http://tv.msn.com/tv/episode/growing-up-fisher/pilot/^{[permanent dead link]} or similar site. You cannot copy episode summaries from elsewhere. These need to be in your own words. Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Your addition to Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series, season 4) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from press release: http://www.thefutoncritic.com/listings/20140214cbs08/ – Recollected • 05:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well then fix it yourself!!!

Your addition to Growing Up Fisher has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summary copied word-for-word from http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/tv/growing-up-fisher-pilot/EP017384660001?aid=zap2it or similar site. Logical Fuzz (talk) 10:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for repeated copyright infringement

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MER-C 12:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contempt for the people who are trying to fix your edits is unacceptable. MER-C 12:47, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brianis19. Thank you. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brianis19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I first want to apologize to all the users for all of the copyright material I put on. The only thing is that no one rights a summary or fixes it that is one reason I did it. So I'm sorry about that. Another thing is that yes I have another account too because I did not know how to fix the problem and I was scared. So if wanna take the time to review my case just do so but I understand why you blocked me and all the copyrighting violations will stop and will right them myself.

Decline reason:

Firstly, I can see a large number of warnings on this page regarding copyright violations, and I would like to know why you ignored them. Secondly, it is not down to us to correct your mistakes, it is down to you not to make them. Please explain your understanding of copyright policy, and say how your editing would change if you were unblocked. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brianis19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why the copyright infringement is implied because it's like stealing information and should not be copied in any way. And should only right the summaries in our own word. And yes I've seen these meassages and really understood them until now. So I apologize for the vandalism and will not happen again

Decline reason:

The above appeal gives me no confidence whatsoever that you have understood - or indeed, even read - Wikipedia's copyright policy. Until you are able to convince an administrator that you understand and will abide by this policy, you will not be unblocked. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brianis19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I'm back because I think that this block is no longer necessary or disruptive because over the past few months I have learning more about Wikipedia's copyright policy and why copy right violations are bad thing because its stealing other publishers work and it's the copywriters property, and it's Wikipedia's most important aspects for things not to be redistributed. Also I am deeply sorry for what I did in the past, I regret all the violations I did, and I've learned a lot as an editor. Brianis19 (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To convince us that a block is no longer needed, you will need to elaborate on specifics you have learned, and how your editing behavior will change. —Bagumba (talk) 21:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brianis19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The specific things I have learned is that you never copy and paste copyrighted content like plot summaries to specific episodes of a show, also vandalism should NEVER be done at anytime. All announced content should have it specific source of information on where at came I have come to realize how important copyrighted is important to the author and should never be exploited in anyway shape or form.

Decline reason:

Part of the problem in the past has been your attitude to copyright problems that you have caused. For example, this response was unacceptable. Given that your unblock request doesn't address this problem, I'm declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 15:35, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2015

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Brianis19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I realized I did that and I'm very sorry that I did it my attitude has changed dramatically and I am aware of the Copyright Infringement violations I did in the past. I'm more patient, I will source the content, and my Block I think is no longer needed because I've read the copyright policy many times since the block and I think I'm no longer a threat and I have never hacked any website either. Thank you for your consideration. Brianis19 (talk) 09:33, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Following discussion with the blocking admin, I've decided to unblock your account. You should note this is a last chance - if there are further problems you will be reblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MER-C:- would you object to an unblock? PhilKnight (talk) 10:51, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. I'm willing to give this a shot, but Brianis19 should be aware that if he violates the copyright policy again he will be reblocked likely with no recourse. MER-C 04:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request for Sophie Hunter page

Can you please insert this parameter to Sophie Hunter's page as she has notable family members. You can just copy-paste the one I've coded below and just replace the parentheses with brackets for linking. The sources are in the page's family section. Thank you very much and keep up the good work you do here on Wiki! 89.144.230.37 (talk) 02:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

|family =

((Michael Gow (British Army officer)
Michael Gow))
(maternal grandfather)
((J. E. B. Seely, 1st Baron Mottistone
J. E. B. Seely))
(maternal great-grandfather)
((Timothy Carlton))
(father-in-law)
((Wanda Ventham))
(mother-in-law)

Brianis19, it would seem that this IP is actually a blocked sock wanting to get content readded that was deleted because of his socky-ness. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Family Guy (season 13) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Callmemirela. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 20) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callmemirela (talk) 02:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 20), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Callmemirela (talk) 02:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 18 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2014–15 United States network television schedule page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TVCAST

Please note that, per WP:TVCAST "main" cast status is determined by the series producers, not by popularity or screen time. Actors who are credited on-screen in the opening credits of TV series are considered to be main cast, regardless of how many episodes they have been credited in. Please also note that, per the instructions for {{Infobox television}}, cast are listed in original credit order followed by order in which new cast joined the show. Joe Minoso was credited before Christian Stolte and therefore should be listed before him. --AussieLegend (✉) 03:56, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles

Please note that when splitting articles, as you did with NCIS: New Orleans, Wikipedia's licensing requires that attribution be given to all users involved in creating and altering the content of a page. Please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklist Season 3

Hi Brianis19! I just wanted to let you know that first of all, I am all for having a Season 3 page for The Blacklist, but if you're going to create the page, you need to add some new information to it. Other editors will probably tell you that there is nothing on the page so far that can't be found elsewhere on Wikipedia. There is plenty of articles out there on season 3 casting and production. When you look at the Scandal (season 5) page and the Empire (season 2) pages, you will see that there is A LOT of new info about recurring cast members, and guests, as well as information about production. I appreciate your efforts making the page, but could you please expand it just a bit?? Thank you! Rswallis10 (talk) 01:10, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series, season 6), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grace Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings tables

Just over a week ago you added a ratings table to Scorpion (TV series) that failed to comply with several aspects of the MOS had other, non-MOS issues.[1] I notice that today you've added a similar table to The Last Man on Earth (TV series).[2] Please don't continue to use this code. It does not comply with MOS:ACCESS/MOS:DTT, MOS:BOLD and MOS:HASH, and contains deprecated and unnecessary code. I've corrected the code in both articles,[3][4] so you can use that as a template, but the other code is really unnaceptable. I'm aware that it's used in several articles, but it really needs to be fixed in all of them. --AussieLegend (✉) 13:53, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago Fire (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie Barnett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NCIS: New Orleans (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCIS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Television episodes

Please be careful when incrementing the number of aired episodes for a series, and make that they are either currently airing or already aired. For example, Castle airs at 10/9c - it is currently 8.20pm EST, meaning you updated it almost two hours early, which leads to factually incorrect articles. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bumping this. Please educate yourself on what time episodes air, and then update them, else this can be viewed as disruptive editing. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same case (again) with Blindspot (TV series). Please confirm that you're actually reading this and taking note. Well, either that, or you simply don't care? Alex|The|Whovian^? 02:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize I wasn't thinking. Brianis19

Please make sure that someone hasn't already incremented the number of episodes; you may not necessarily always be the first one to update the page. Alex|The|Whovian^? 00:34, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revisiting the message on 22 March 2016 again. This time at Gotham (TV series)‎. Alex|The|Whovian^? 02:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for that. Thanks for the heads up Alex|The|Whovian. I changed the date on the List of episodes page thinking the episode count wasn't changed either. User:Brianis19

I really shouldn't need to repeat this again. Check before you update it. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And again. Already updated, then you did it again. I thought we'd managed to fix this. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Not my intention. I was updating the season didn't know the episode was updated. -Brianis19 21:34, 26 September 2016

Aaaand again [5][6]. Check before you update. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Carmichael Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerry Cohen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Carmichael Show episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerry Cohen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles again

When splitting articles, as you did to The Odd Couple (2015 TV series), it is a legal requirement that attribution be provided at both the source and destination articles, something I explained to you last year above. You did not do this so could you please do so now. For more information please see WP:CWW. Your split also left the main article with 3 missing references. A bot has fix two but 1 is still missing. When you are fixing the attribution problem, please take the time to fix that as well. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for discussion on the proposal

You are invited in the discussion here regarding episode appearance count in TV show franchise pages. BattleshipMan (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bachelor in Paradise. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles again - AGAIN!

I have reverted your split of The Odd Couple (2015 TV series) again as you once again split the article without providing attribution as required by Wikipedia's licensing requirements. It was only a month ago that I reminded you of the need to provide attribution and to fix references in the article,[7] and you did neither. Splitting articles without providing attribution constitutes a copyright violation, which is not permitted. Please do not split the article again without providing attribution. --AussieLegend (✉) 12:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016–17 United States network television schedule

I added redlinks to the new shows to indicate that they need articles. Some of the links redirect to other articles, but the point is still the same. Just to let you know. QuasyBoy (talk) 06:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Updating episodes

When updating episodes, don't just update the "As of" date and number of episodes, also remove the "RTitle" reference for the aired episode. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read this? Alex|The|Whovian^? 02:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize my mistake ^? Brianis19

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Ballas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nick Carter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 26 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the 2015–16 United States network television schedule page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SYTYCD: Next Gen

Hi. I have been trying to figure out exactly how the "academy" eliminations will work. Nigel said that each all-star must choose 5 dancers for their "team" and then narrow it down to one "by the end of the week", but it appears that the dancers also get to choose their all-stars. And what, exactly will the judges do? Have you come across any good sources for all this? All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm AlexTheWhovian. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Wayward Pines episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is in concerns to the production codes. Alex|The|Whovian^? 08:23, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aquarius figures

I have restored the separate prelim figures due to Nielsen not releasing finals for commercial free blocks. And if you noticed the zap2it final figures is just the a single average of the two prelim hour blocks. Also showbuzz figures are preferred due to the fact they don't do two decimal rounding on finals like the staff at zap2it stupidly do. helmboy 10:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

reverted edit on 2015–16 United States network television schedule

Hi there, I see you reverted my recent edit on 2015–16 United States network television schedule. Just wanted to touch base to ask why, as all I did was insert a few spaces around punctuation for readability, and correct the typo-d name of an author listed as a source. If I'm missing something, I'd like to know, so I can avoid making the same mistake in the future. Thank you! Jessicapierce (talk) 02:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Middle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Good Place, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Miner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox television season

When using Infobox television season there is no need to include |prev_season= and |next_season= if |show_name= and |season_number= are being used, the infobox automatically creates the links, so there is no need tomanulayy include them. You've restored a number of links to multiple articles when these links are clearly not needed. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NCIS: New Orleans (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bull (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm AlexTheWhovian. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lucifer (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Alex|The|Whovian^? 05:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NCIS: New Orleans (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Arnold. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

When you remove content from templates like Template:CBSNetwork Shows (current and upcoming), don't forget to remove the template from the articles' pages.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 07:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 5 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the The Blacklist (season 4) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 11 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Superstore (season 2) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Superstore dispute

I agree that unverified content should be hidden until they air. As of now there are 10 verified episodes2600:1:F415:FE9F:C549:89DC:35C7:68DA (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Brianis19. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No edit summaries on your last 100 edits

I checked 100, no summaries. Given a) your experience and b) your block history, it would seem that repeatedly omitting such summaries might lead to administrator action. Just a guess. 96.127.242.152 (talk) 04:47, 16 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

Reference errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Hell's Kitchen (U.S. season 16) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's an ongoing RfC at Kristen Stewart

Please do not reinsert an infobox at Kristen Stewart as there is an ongoing RfC at Talk:Kristen Stewart#Survey. Please comment there instead, as further reinstatements may lead to administrative action. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud 9

Please explain your removal. Your points make no sense whatsoever. It is not written from a fan point of view, its written as factual information about the store. The entire show is based around the store and it therefore relevant information. Its not different than a character, the store has a life of its own on the show, but does not belong on the character page, it is the only place that makes sense for it. - Galatz ^Talk 01:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First, you do not have real sources only excerpts from the episodes. Cloud 9 is only a setting. Brianis19 (talk) 21:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A setting has nothing to do with it not being notable. Springfield is just a setting on the Simpsons, Stars Hollow is just a setting on the Gilmore Girls, or more similarly Fox River State Penitentiary is just a setting on Prison Break. Just because its a section of the article rather than its own article, it doesn't make it any less notable because its too small for its own article. Additionally if you have an issue with the references then fix it, don't delete it. I have added a couple other sources for now as well, feel free to add more if thats your issue. - Galatz ^Talk 02:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll add the section to the Production section to make it look better after The Mindy Project crossover. Brianis19 (talk) 03:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keeping MOS:CURLY in mind when adding ratings for TV shows

Hi,

I notice you add a lot of ratings info to television show pages, such as here. I was wondering if you knew about the MOS:CURLY guideline, because in pretty much every rating I've seen you add, you've used curly quotes instead of straight quotes.

Anyway, just wanted to bring that to your attention in case you didn't realize we should be swapping out the curly ones when adding content. —Joeyconnick (talk) 05:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sasha Farber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Untouchable (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up / A small request

Hey there, I notice you seem to be the person who always updates episode counts and all that for when a show airs a new episode. However, I ask you not to worry about Bones next week. It's the series finale, and I'd really like to be the one to do it as I've been the top Bones wiki contributor and I used to make the updates for certain shows (like Bones) live, but now I just wait until the morning after if they need updating. Unless you're a fan too, but it seems you update for basically every network TV series, so maybe you update shows you don't watch, I don't know. Let me know. Thank you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Drovethrughosts Not to sound rude or blunt, of course... But why does it matter who updates it? It's just a series, everyone's edits are equal, there's many ways to continue to contribute to the article(s) to be a top contributor. If Brianis doesn't do it, who's to say someone else does it? -- Alex^TW 10:39, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Follow-up on the 2016-17 TV schedule

Briannis, once again, please refrain from using "follow-up", a meaningless term, on the 2016-17 TV schedule. I've corrected these edits by you and several other editors more than once, and the change to seasonal terms (such as the correct Mid-spring) was discussed on the talk page, yet you persist in using, or in this case ignoring, follow-up. As a responsible editor, you should have corrected the IPs error when you highlighted the correct box. --Drmargi (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to talk page

You are invited to the section of the talk page of Chicago Justice. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series, season 7), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Forsythe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2016–17 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bachelor in Paradise. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Superstore (season 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Weaver. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Malibu (Miley Cyrus song)

Your edit at "Malibu" (Miley Cyrus song) is wrong. The date of the magazine issue is May 13, 2017, which differs from the published date of May 8, 2017. This is cited, as per such, in the source given on the page. You are confusing the issue date of the magazine's issue from the published date of the online webpage. livelikemusic talk! 23:01, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Reality Television Task Force

Hello Brianis19! I noticed your contributions to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series), and thought you might be interested in the Reality Television Task Force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Reality Television.

If you would like to participate, please visit the task force page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! WikiVirusC (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Season 4 color

Can you change the color to The Blacklist (season 4) it back to how it once was before you changed it? Unicornaholic243 (talk) 21:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Rainbow (Kesha album), you may be blocked from editing. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 08:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Error in page "The Wall" (game show)

Hello. In "Season 2" below in Green is listed "Season 1" contestants. The list below the green are the contestants from Season 2. Ryan and Stephenie and following contestants are Season 2. John and Angel and following contestants are season 1. The chart is in error but I don't know how to correct the chart. Mark Bruno 04:16, 19 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkBruno (talk • contribs) 04:11, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ShowbuzzDaily to TVbyTheNumbers changes????!!!!??????

Do you work for the useless TVbyTheNumbers web site and are trying to promote their less accurate broadcast finals? And you have NO right or reason to force a change once a editor has added ratings to a episode. Also TVbyTheNumbers demo share figures are incorrectly average when the male and female 18-49 values are too close to each other. You are nothing more than a vandal when you unnecessarily change sources. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 02:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

119.224.3.221 There's no need for this kind of conduct especially with you as an anonymous user. I did not vandalize the page. Just followed about 90% of Television ratings on every television series article with TV by the numbers. Brianis19 (talk) 02:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aired episodes

Please just remove the |finished= parameter in {{Aired episodes}}; do not change it to |aired=, as this parameter does not exist at all. -- Alex^TW 08:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of programs broadcast by American Broadcasting Company

There is currently a dispute on List of programs broadcast by American Broadcasting Company regarding the placement of General Hospital. Being their own genre, soap operas have always been listed in a Soap Opera section (as is also done on lists for CBS and NBC shows and other networks). Former soaps are also been listed in their own category on these pages (and continue to be on the ABC list). An editor the past few days has been making edits putting it into the section with the primetime dramas. As one of the few other registered editors who has recently edited this page (most edits are by random IPs), do you have input as a third party on the matter? -AnonWikiEditor (talk) 02:06, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii Five-0 (Question)

You've been here longer than I have and I was wondering if there was a reason that in the Hawaii Five-0 season articles up until Hawaii Five-0 (2010 TV series, season 8) we've only labeled Jorge Garcia as "Jerry Ortega" and not "Special Consultant Jerry Ortega" in the season cast listings?

Happy Thanksgiving!

TheDoctorWho (talk) has given you a Turkey! Turkeys promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a turkey, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy Thanksgiving!

Spread the goodness of turkey by adding {{Thanksgiving Turkey}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Brianis19. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Famousbirthdays.com as a source

Hi Brianis19. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Nico Santos (actor). Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 21:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

24 Hours

Hello, I was just wondering how you found the nightly rank for Gordon's 24 Hours to Hell and Back, as I have no clue where that would be located and it's not in the source. Thanks. Magitroopa (talk) 01:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @Brianis19: hope you don't mind but @Magitroopa: the nightly rankings are based on the same source. The show with the highest rating would be #1 on the nightly rank. For example in this most recent Wednesday it would be it would be Big Brother because it has the highest number of viewers and the highest rating/share. So the next highest show would be the #2 slot again in this case it would be the CMA Fest. If you continue going down the list Gordon's 24 Hours to Hell and Back is the fourth rated. Hope this cleared up any confusion and let me know if you have more questions! TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing with the Stars Juniors

Hi, do you think it is too early to create a page for Dancing with the Stars: Juniors? MSalmon (talk) 20:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

You have been informed at least three times before to read and follow WP:CWW. So once again ... you must give attribution when copying content from other Wikipedia articles as you did at NCIS: New Orleans (season 5). Repeatedly refusing to give attribution can get you blocked from editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:44, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that copying within Wikipedia without giving proper attribution is a copyright violation. You said in your previous unblock request that you've "read the copyright policy many times" yet this is the fourth time since your unblocked that an editor is telling you to read and follow WP:CWW. Bennv3771 (talk) 08:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies it was not my intention. Brianis19 (talk) 23:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Brianis19. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing with the stars Season 27

You vandalized Dancing with the Stars Season 27 with the "Bobby and Sharna were disqualified for awful dancing" and changing the scores. Please do not do this again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:341:8100:A808:817:4E5:86E1:CE2A (talk) 22:12, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not vandalize the page. I only update the tv ratings. Brianis19 (talk) 02:15, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. THIS THREAD-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chicago med

Its Dr Ava BEKKER not BEKKAR. RaymundDawson61 (talk) 17:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edit - May 2019

Hi, I'm GUtt01. An edit you made to America's Got Talent has been reverted due to a consensus over how the "For/About" template in article is used. It is the general consensus that such templates are not used to highlight an article concerning an upcoming/currently broadcasting season of a TV program, hence you're recent edit to do this was reverted to fall in line with this consensus. Please be careful not to make this mistake again. Thank you. GUtt01 (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Woohooo

Hey, Brianis19. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Mjs1991 (talk) 06:25, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Little Late with Lilly Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Graham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:11, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TV by the Numbers

This Archived 2020-02-01 at the Wayback Machine. So what will be happening here with shows like Gordon Ramsay's 24 Hours to Hell and Back that uses TVbtN for viewership? Will sites like Showbuzz Daily be using the shows now or no? I'm not that knowledgeable with what sites get what ratings. :P Magitroopa (talk) 02:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ShowbuzzDaily is probably the next best thing. It updates with the final numbers as accurate if not better than as TVBTN. Brianis19 (talk) 06:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not to bust into the conversation, but with what Brianis19 said about TVBTN accuracy, I noticed over the years that TVBTN often made rounding errors compared to Showbuzz Daily. I noticed sometimes they cut off the viewers at 2 decimals but didn't round it based on the third decimal (e.g., 2.795 million viewers on SBD would appear as 2.79 on TVBTN)... But yeah I would agree Showbuzz Daily is the most accurate/reputable source for comprehensive ratings (not just sites like Deadline or The Hollywood Reporter which don't really update from fast nationals to final). However, you do have to average the 18-49 share from male and female, as the combined isn't given. As far as DVR ratings, everyone has been using Programming Insider since TVBTN kind of stopped posting DVR ratings this fall. They also have household ratings which is particularly useful for award shows, Super Bowl, etc.. They have everything but take a little longer to post than SBD; I would/will use either one. Heartfox (talk) 20:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of The Resident episodes (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This draft is a request to spin out an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source. This does not mean that the draft should be spun out, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun out. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.) Discuss at Talk:The Resident (TV series).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of The Resident episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of The Resident episodes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brianis19! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 9-1-1: Lone Star. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 07:55, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Little Late with Lilly Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nico Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:08, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lego Masters (American TV series), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 23:20, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Celebrity Watch Party. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I know I've already warned you about this before... there is no reason to be adding things in an incorrect format, especially when it is done right multiple times above it. If for whatever reason you're not able to do it properly, then just let other editors handle it. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 05:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Celebrity Watch Party, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop changing citation style based on your personal preference, as per WP:CITEVAR and WP:OSE. Magitroopa (talk) 06:08, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:54, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Brianis19 (talk) 06:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Brianis19. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 06:11, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of The Resident episodes

Hello, Brianis19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of The Resident episodes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary notice

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 09:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why the UNDOs?

I would like to know why my additions were undone on Masters of Illusion TV page. Were my references not valid? Were the edits incorrect? Waltp9999 (talk) 19:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Because the "Series Overview" table covers how many seasons its been on The CW. Brianis19 (talk) 23:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But if I'm looking for a specific CW series it's not readily apparent which season I should be looking at. Adding the seasons as I did makes it simple and follows both IMDB and the CWTV site. Since the added info is helpful and follows the official information stated, it makes sense to coordinate the wiki list with these other lists. Waltp (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jenna Johnson (dancer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rain on Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 06:26, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize it won't happen again. Brianis19 (talk) 01:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like you haven't learned since that warning last month, as you clearly continue to do the same exact issue. Magitroopa (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hell's Kitchen (American season 19). Consider this your final warning, as you've already been warned previous amounts of time and still can't do it right whatsoever. Let the people who know how to do it right handle it. Magitroopa (talk) 02:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also worth noting that after your previous warning, you replied stating, "I apologize it won't happen again."- yet it's happened multiple times again since you said that. I highly suggest you stop your disruptive editing and either let the experts handle it, or figure out how to do it right, since you still can't figure it out despite the citations done properly preceding every time you add a new one incorrectly. Magitroopa (talk) 02:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Whose Line Is It Anyway? (American season 17). Magitroopa (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago P.D. (season 8), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Coleman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Despite you saying, "it won't happen again" back in January, it is quite clear you have not learned from your previous warnings. Despite any of the warnings, it appears you still cannot do it right. I suggest you stop and let other users who actually know how to do it handle it. You've been given far too many 'final warnings' by this point- next time you do it incorrectly a report will be filed against you at WP:ANI. Magitroopa (talk) 23:25, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Small comment

When adding sources from an author with a Wikipedia article, link them (example "author-link=Mitch Metcalf"). Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, Brianis19. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:07, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Future Fool Us episode schedule

Hi Brianis19 -- where do you find out about guests on future episodes of shows, specifically Fool Us (which I saw you updated recently.) Thx!! Deanpickles415 (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More errors...

Please stop listing the incorrect author for articles on Showbuzz Daily (such as how you did here and continue to do so). How is it so difficult to go to an article and get the right author? Magitroopa (talk) 08:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at America's Got Talent (season 17), you may be blocked from editing. You've been warned far too many times and continue with the same disruptions. Continue and a report will be filed at ANI. Please stop now. Magitroopa (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tenth anniversary on Wikipedia!

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Brianis19,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 15:20, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Fire (season 11) (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at [[:Chicago Fire (TV series)]]. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As the Chicago Fire (TV series) already exists, there is no need of separate article on season 11.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chicago Fire (season 11) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 10:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chicago Fire (season 11) has been accepted

Chicago Fire (season 11), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 12:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 United States network television schedule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page What Would You Do?.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]