Jump to content

User talk:Lemonade51/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

11v11

Hi mate. Yes, I noticed that the Independent ref didn't have info about the booking times. I meant to remove the times, but I guess it slipped my mind before I clicked "Save page". I have, however, found another source that you might deem acceptable. The 18 August 1998 issue of Match magazine has times for all the match events, so I'll stick them in the article now. – PeeJay 21:39, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

No worries. I've made the changes and will upload the new version now. – PeeJay 13:51, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1989 FA Charity Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1989 FA Charity Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 08:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Another solid GA Lemonade51, you're good at these! Keep up the good work! C679 20:13, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1989 FA Charity Shield

The article 1989 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1989 FA Charity Shield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cloudz679 -- Cloudz679 (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi mate, I don't have access to the Courier Mail article currently listed as reference #8 in the 1998 FA Charity Shield article, but can you confirm for me that it explicitly says that Arsenal qualified for the Shield as winners of the Premier League? If that's so, then (technically) the Premier League had two representatives in the match. I think it's more likely that Arsenal were in the Shield as FA Cup winners, with Manchester United taking the Premier League berth; otherwise it surely would have been Newcastle in the Shield as FA Cup runners-up? Sounds like a moot point, I guess, but I just want to make sure the wording of the article is accurate. – PeeJay 17:59, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I think you've misinterpreted the quote there. It says Manchester United would have to play in the Shield if Arsenal beat Newcastle. Had Newcastle beaten Arsenal, Newcastle would have played in the Shield instead, but since Arsenal won, they filled the FA Cup berth in the Shield. As you say, Arsenal would have played in it either way as they had already clinched the league, but my point is that because they won the FA Cup, they went into the Shield primarily as FA Cup winners. – PeeJay 21:13, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2004 FA Community Shield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005 FA Community Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2005 FA Community Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 02:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005 FA Community Shield

The article 2005 FA Community Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2005 FA Community Shield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 00:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations on another GA! I have nominated it for DYK here. Thanks, Matty.007 14:26, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2004 FA Community Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2004 FA Community Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 20:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2004 FA Community Shield

The article 2004 FA Community Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2004 FA Community Shield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 22:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for 2005 FA Community Shield

Orlady (talk) 07:59, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sky Television. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

2000 UEFA Cup Final

Sorry for my response (I was preparing some dinner), but cheers for the Good article status, I really appreciate it. I would like to say that I'm proud of the article myself, but if there is still something that bothers me, it's probably the match summary part; I feel that I haven't mentioned all the important things and that there is still a good deal of clutter in it. Therefore, I'm thinking about rewriting some of it, in other words, model it a bit after this article – I hope you are not bothered by this and that it doesn't lose the Good article status because of this reason. I might also consider throwing in a team selection section later on. Arbero (talk) 20:30, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

FA congratulations

Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of 1998 FA Charity Shield to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA) appear as "Today's featured article" soon (either on a particular date or on any available date), please nominate it at the requests page. If you'd like to see an FA appear on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with about 1,302 articles waiting their turn at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. BencherliteTalk 13:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2007 Football League Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

The article 2007 Football League Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2007 Football League Cup Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 04:21, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

The article 2007 Football League Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2007 Football League Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

Boat Race reviews

The Running Man Barnstar
Hey Lemonade51, just a quick barnstar to say thanks for the many reviews of Boat Race articles you've conducted over the past year. As of this morning, I completed my (initial) goal of ensuing that every Boat Race had, not only its own article, but one that was either of GA or FA status: we now have 158 GAs and 3 FAs that we can all be proud of! It doesn't stop here, for me at least, I'm going to keep up with improving the quality of the GAs and look for more FA opportunities. Plus, there's the small matter of 70 Women's Boat Race articles to get up and running! But thanks again, I couldn't have done it without your help. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:40, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, when you have a spare moment would you mind reviewing List of York City F.C. players (fewer than 25 appearances) at FLC? Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:28, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Lemonade51. I'm just posting to let you know that Premier League Manager of the Season – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 11. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Buffet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Gray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1979 FA Charity Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1979 FA Charity Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 08:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Arsenal red card list

Hi, I like your Wenger red card list that you have created but had one small suggestion. Would it be possible to do footnotes or add an extra column to show red cards that were rescinded after an appeal? The one I was most concerned about was the Kieran Gibbs red card for handball which was mistaken identity. Just thinking if it were to be nominated to be a featured list, that might be the sort of thing they will try to ask you to implement. Excellent list though. Spiderone 09:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Arsenal red cards under Arsène Wenger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Arsenal red cards under Arsène Wenger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 09:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, would you mind taking a look at Bootham Crescent, which is up at FAC? Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 15:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Peer review request

Hi, since you're listed at WP:PRV, can you have a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/S.L. Benfica in European football/archive1 and give me some feedback. It's been slow to pick up and I don't want to propose the article to GAN and have it failed for obvious reasons that I wasn't aware. --Threeohsix (talk) 21:15, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2002 FA Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Wright. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 12:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2002_FA_Cup_Final

The article 2002_FA_Cup_Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2002_FA_Cup_Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. 333-blue 10:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season has been nominated for Did You Know

Hey there. I hope your FLC is successful, you seem to only need another reviewer lending support. Anyway, I also nominated a similar list and was hoping you could do the same favour and give it a go? Thanks! Parutakupiu (talk) 20:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2015 FA Community Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2015 FA Community Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2015 FA Community Shield

The article 2015 FA Community Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2015 FA Community Shield for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1979 FA Charity Shield

The article 1979 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1979 FA Charity Shield for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 12:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

FL question

Hi Lemonade51, I saw you recently reviewed a FL for Grapple X that was kind of complicated, (List of Millennium characters) in that the list had a lot of text content and was far more than an annotated list. and was wondering if you'd be interested in doing an informal PR on Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing (United States) to see what's missing or - more to the point - what could be done differently before I put this up for a FL; I've done quite a few FAC, but never a FL so any help or even informal comments there at the talk page would be welcomed! Thanks. Montanabw(talk) 22:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

1979 FA Charity Shield has been nominated for Did You Know

Your GA nomination of 1979 FA Charity Shield

The article 1979 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1979 FA Charity Shield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 03:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

2015 FA Community Shield has been nominated for Did You Know

DYK for 2002 FA Cup Final

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Buffet

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of the Buffet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Almightey Drill -- The Almightey Drill (talk) 19:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2004–05 Arsenal F.C. season

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 1979 FA Charity Shield

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2015 FA Community Shield

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Arsenal F.C. managers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Whittaker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arsène Wenger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford Bridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1994 European Super Cup

The article 1994 European Super Cup you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1994 European Super Cup for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NapHit -- NapHit (talk) 00:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hey Lemonade51, I've passed the article! Congratulations and kudos to you and your hard graft, you're doing some great work getting those Arsenal matches up to scratch! By the way, it would be great if you could revisit your comments at the History of Liverpool F.C. (1959–85) FAC. The nom seems to have stagnated a bit recently! Cheers NapHit (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1994 European Super Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Premier League Awards

Afternoon Lemonade, I saw your name on the FLC nomination for the various award lists we have for the Premier League (you appear to have got the ball rolling back in 2012 [1]. These appear to be under protection from a specific user using the FLC nomination as "consensus" for not allowing updates to the content. Anyway, I'd appreciate your input on recent changes made to the below:

Thanks. Koncorde (talk) 16:54, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately my other updates have been reverted, but will wait patiently for others to come to same conclusion. Koncorde (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2001 FA Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Silvinho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1948 FA Charity Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1948 FA Charity Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1948 FA Charity Shield

The article 1948 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1948 FA Charity Shield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Miyagawa -- Miyagawa (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001 FA Cup Final

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2001 FA Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 12:01, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001 FA Cup Final

The article 2001 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2001 FA Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 01:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

@Lemonade51: Hi Lemonade. Isn't it a bit harsh removing Bernard Joy's book from the references? If nothing else, it adds diversity of source types. Also, the specific links for the Wartime leagues seemed useful, since the internal linking by RSSSF is terrible, making those sources otherwise hard to find. Madshurtie (talk) 14:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Arsenal F.C. players (25–99 appearances), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Whittaker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I've nominated my first two FL recently and I'm waiting for feedback. Since you have experience at writing and promoting FA/FL, I thought you wouldn't mind passing at List of S.L. Benfica players and give some comments. Thanks in any case.--Threeohsix (talk) 17:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

The article Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Broadcasting and the foundation of the Premier League for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1953 FA Charity Shield, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bill Dodgin, Ernie Taylor and Cyril Robinson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Arsenal

In my opinion I think the fact Arsenal received a special trophy which no other club has received makes it an honour worth differentiating from the other league honours where they didn't receive any special trophy. Cup winners will always receive the same trophy so it's not the same for cups. If you think italicising the 2003/04 season is wrong, then surely that would mean making double winning seasons bold is also wrong because it's also mentioned in the text above? The fact is double winning seasons are distinct from single winning seasons, just like receiving a special golden trophy is distinct from receiving a normal silver one, so in my opinion they should be differentiated from the other seasons. Hashim-afc (talk) 18:37, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

I disagree with you. The unbeaten season isn't purely statistical because we got awarded a different trophy that no other league winning team has been awarded. That fact is what makes it tangible and not statistical. Liverpool getting to keep the trophy is different, firstly because it wasn't a different trophy that they were awarded it was still the same one, and secondly because them getting to keep the trophy wasn't because of the 2004/05 Champions League itself but it was a build up of all their previous trophies so it would be wrong just to italicise one of them not all five. Also, it's wrong just to say that Doubles are tangible and being awarded a special trophy isn't because that's purely subjective. All of the Double winning seasons are mentioned in the above text so according to your logic there's no reason to make them bold. The 2003/04 season is a distinctive achievement which has been recognised by the FA as being so, hence why they created a new trophy just for it.
Think of it this way, if another team wins the league unbeaten in the future then they will be awarded a golden trophy too. The golden trophy makes an unbeaten season different from a normal one and it should be recognised that way in the honours listing just like winning the double is recognised with bold text. I've made that bold because I think it is the key point to consider here. I know I'm not too good at explaining but oh well, I hope you understand what I'm trying to say. I'm going to undo your edit for now but if you disagree still then maybe we should discuss it in WP:FOOTY. Hashim-afc (talk) 20:24, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1988 Football League Cup Final, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Preece. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1953 FA Charity Shield

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1953 FA Charity Shield you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nazcheema -- Nazcheema (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005 FA Cup Final

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2005 FA Cup Final you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yellow Dingo -- Yellow Dingo (talk) 13:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1953 FA Charity Shield

The article 1953 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:1953 FA Charity Shield for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nazcheema -- Nazcheema (talk) 14:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005 FA Cup Final

The article 2005 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2005 FA Cup Final for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yellow Dingo -- Yellow Dingo (talk) 15:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2005 FA Cup Final

The article 2005 FA Cup Final you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2005 FA Cup Final for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yellow Dingo -- Yellow Dingo (talk) 11:41, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1953 FA Charity Shield

The article 1953 FA Charity Shield you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1953 FA Charity Shield for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nazcheema -- Nazcheema (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for 2005 FA Cup Final

On 12 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2005 FA Cup Final, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2005 FA Cup Final was Patrick Vieira's last match as an Arsenal player? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2005 FA Cup Final. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2005 FA Cup Final), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Feedback

Hi, can you give me your input in my recent FLC, at List of S.L. Benfica players (25–99 appearances? Thanks. Also, I would comment in your FAC for 2003-04 season article, but I don't want to be the first to do it.--Threeohsix (talk) 13:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lemonade. This went through WP:TFAR and was promoted. I see you were pinged, but pinging doesn't always work so I don't know if you've seen it. - Dank (push to talk) 22:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)