User talk:Locky1986

Welcome!

Hello, Locky1986, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:13, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Locky1986, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Locky1986! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:High Heels (Melanie C song) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:High Heels (Melanie C song). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Heels (Melanie C song) (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:High Heels (Melanie C song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:High Heels (Melanie C song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Who I Am (Melanie C song) (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Who I Am (Melanie C song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Who I Am (Melanie C song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: High Heels (Melanie C song) (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs sourcing and detailed charting results.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:High Heels (Melanie C song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:High Heels (Melanie C song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Locky1986, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Locky, reminding you of what Cabayi posted above. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thirteen Senses, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waterloo Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jason Maza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alright Now (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugh Sachs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mad Dogs and Englishmen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

B7 edit

Do you have a reliable source for this edit? ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 16:18, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the urbanbridges reference calling "Borderline" the second single. This has not been officially confirmed. Given that "Rather Be" has just been released, its speculation to suggest a second single has been confirmed. The instant download of "Rather Be" could be classified as a second single. It is best to wait until further information. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 19:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. livelikemusic (TALK!) 12:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Queen of the Damned: Music from the Motion Picture, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Oroborvs (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Brandy What About Us Set 2001.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Brandy What About Us Set 2001.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:44, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Brandy performing on Broadway in the musical "Chicago".jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Brandy performing on Broadway in the musical "Chicago".jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:48, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Brandy performing on tour in 2016.png

A tag has been placed on File:Brandy performing on tour in 2016.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:49, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Brandy Borderline Video Club Scene.png

A tag has been placed on File:Brandy Borderline Video Club Scene.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy Borderline Performance Video.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy Borderline Performance Video.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:52, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy Borderline Video Image.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy Borderline Video Image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy Baby Mama Video Image.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy Baby Mama Video Image.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy What About Us Set 2001.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy What About Us Set 2001.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy performing on Broadway in the musical "Chicago".jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy performing on Broadway in the musical "Chicago".jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:28, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Limit to amount of scores listed in Template:Album ratings

Hi. I've noticed you keep adding reviews/scores to the album ratings template on B7 (album). Per the template's instructions (at Template:Album ratings), it is recommended we include no more than 10 reviews in table form. Most well-maintained album articles on Wikipedia follow this standard, and so should this article. It's great that you're enthusiastic about the material, but just because a review has been published, does not mean it should necessarily be added to the Wikipedia article. We need to pick and choose which material we include on Wikipedia, because we're not an exhaustive source of information. The reception section is beginning to look quite stuffed as it stands. If you reply, please reply here. Ss112 14:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Melanie C (album) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Melanie C (album). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melanie C (album) has been accepted

Melanie C (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Melanie C Eighth Studio Album Cover, 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Melanie C Eighth Studio Album Cover, 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Melanie C Self Titled Album 2020.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Melanie C Self Titled Album 2020.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 21:23, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logged-out edting

You have continued to edit while logged out, this time using User:92.18.117.219. You have been blocked for 1 week. When your block expires, you are welcome to continue editing, but if you keep using both your account and and IP, you will be blocked again. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Locky1986. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:49, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:PHD

Please stop adding academic credentials in the lede per policy on this. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logged out editing (again)

After your block expired, you continued to edit under your account and using your IP address. You used your IP to reinstate content you added, and did so without explaining in an edit summary. You have been blocked for a month due to this, and because as you have not addressed or even acknowledged the issues leading to your block. Once your block expires you can edit again, but you need to ensure that you are logged in when you edit, especially when reverting other editors over content you added. If you continue to edit both under your IP and account, you are likely to receive a longer block, possibly even an indefinite block. You may appeal this block using {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Melanie C performing in 2020.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Melanie C performing in 2020.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://twitter.com/MelanieCmusic/status/1311802734207791104/photo/2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 01:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/{{{1}}}]]. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 12:40, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz: They're back and being beyond disruptive at this point. livelikemusic (TALK!) 12:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Livelikemusic, thanks for the ping. Will deal with at the SPI. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz: Perfect, because they now have a second account, as well. livelikemusic (TALK!) 12:55, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that you recently removed content from Melanie C without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 12:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:54, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked, you will also need to address the concerns around sockpuppetry in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Locky1986 and its archive. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:03, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Melanie C Colour and Light LIVE.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Melanie C Colour and Light LIVE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]