Jump to content

User talk:Pereant antiburchius/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of Sharia4Belgium

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Sharia4Belgium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 23:51, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of atheist Nobel laureates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of atheist Nobel laureates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of atheist Nobel laureates (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Your identification of my change as vandalism

If I was the type who was easily offended I'd take issue with your identification of my change to Anti-Western sentiment as vandalism! I'm sure you don't really think that. Please assume my good faith here and naturally I will do the same for you.

I have undone your change and explained my reasoning in the talk page. asnac (talk) 19:47, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Pereant antiburchius/List of atheist Nobel laureates has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of atheist Nobel laureates, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 05:38, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Pereant antiburchius/Jessica Ahlquist has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessica Ahlquist, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:38, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

User:Pereant antiburchius/Christina Rad

Very interesting. Just subscribed to her in youtube. Are you from Rationalwiki? --SupernovaExplosion Talk 15:32, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi :) No I'm not, just Wikipedia. If you're interested, you're very welcome to make additions to the article in my userspace, before I submit it to AfC. --Pereant antiburchius (talk) 11:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited List of Islamic terrorist attacks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Netzarim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 23:57, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited List of Islamic terrorist attacks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Islamic Jihad and Tyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cristina Rad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cristina Rad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bgwhite (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Pereant antiburchius. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 18:05, 21 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Category:Romanian podcasters

Category:Romanian podcasters, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kumioko (talk) 23:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: WikiProject Transhumanism

I'll help but I don't think it was me who created it back then... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 15:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)


Hello.

On my talk page, you wrote: Hi, I've been working a bit on Wikipedia:WikiProject Transhumanism, of which you've been the sole member for a long time. You might want to have a look at it. I created a little userbox to promote the wikiproject, in case you're interested. You're very welcome to expand the project and of course improve it's articles. --Pereant antiburchius (talk) 11:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Nicely done. Probably the top priority of the WikiProject should be bringing its flagship article (Transhumanism) back up to featured article status. Though I'm afraid I'm spread too thin on another department's pages to be of much use to you. The Transhumanist 21:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject banners

Just to let you know, they go on the articles' talk pages, not at the top of the articles themselves. Thanks, Imzadi 1979 → 11:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Ray Kurzweil Article Assessment

I have reviewed the assessment request you submitted to WikiProject Biography for the Ray Kurzweil article and determined that article has already been assessed as B-class, the highest assessment given to articles submitted at that page. If you think the article should be assessed higher than that. I would recommend submitting it to Good article nominations. --TommyBoy (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Ok thank you so much. I nominated the article for GA! --Pereant antiburchius (talk) 19:18, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I'd assess it as C-class, and it is very much not ready for GA. Sorry. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
I would like to apologize if I got your hopes up in recommending that you nominate the article for Good Article Review. --TommyBoy (talk) 07:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Not to worry, maybe I was a little too hasty with the nomination. If it doesn't pass like Piotrus predicts, perhaps instead of getting the GA label we'll get some constructive feedback on this article. --Pereant antiburchius (talk)

Possibly unfree File:Jessica Ahlquist 2012.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jessica Ahlquist 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:11, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jessica Ahlquist 2012.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jessica Ahlquist 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Futures studies

Welcome to WikiProject Futures studies, of which I notice you are on the participant list of. Please feel free to write to my talk page if there's anything you'd like to discuss about that project. Thanks! John b cassel (talk) 12:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Jessica Ahlquist 2012.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jessica Ahlquist 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Ray Kurzweil

In the spirit of the GA backlog review, I reviewed the article for GA status and put it on hold. There are numerous problems with this article, and I don't expect it to pass within the standard week's time. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments, and please update me with your progress. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Circumcision and law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posthumous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit summary, please

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Brianhe (talk) 19:49, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
Good job on the Atheism-related articles. I recently subscribed to The Atheist Experience channel on YouTube, so I decided to take a peak at the article and saw your work in the 'View History' tab. I'll be making some minor edits here and there. Keep it up! ComputerJA (talk) 06:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: Childhood's End

Hi. I saw you tagged it for the h+ project, but I'm curious as to how that project can contribute or why it is relevant. I'm more interested in your personal opinion than anything else. Viriditas (talk) 01:19, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Nontheist Nobel laureates concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Nontheist Nobel laureates, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessica Ahlquist concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jessica Ahlquist, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:26, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission List of Nontheist Nobel laureates

Hello Pereant antiburchius. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled List of Nontheist Nobel laureates.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/List of Nontheist Nobel laureates}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 08:04, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Christian POV pusher

A Christian POV pusher keeps on inserting a large section of Christian nonsense at the Bart Ehrman page in clear violation of WP:BLP. Similarly on the Richard Carrier page, he makes all sorts of unfounded assertions in violation of WP:BLP. Please help at both of these pages.RosylynGrock (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicolaides–Baraitser syndrome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page De novo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AronRa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AronRa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Microchip08 (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John Iadarola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Iadarola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Iadarola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Peregrine981 (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

H+Pedia

Hi there, as a member of Wikiproject transhumanism, I thought you might want to check out the latest on H+Pedia which now has a revamped home page as an introduction point. :) https://hpluspedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Deku-shrub (talk) 21:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Max Aardema

The article Max Aardema has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mr Aardema doesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN and certainly doesn't meet the general WP:BIO criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolotta (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Pereant antiburchius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pereant_antiburchius/Archive_1&oldid=1178363749"