User talk:RealisticIdealist1995

I was actually just in the process of creating a new category for it. Any chance I can finish...?

SureI! :) S0091 (talk) 18:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Man, things move damn fast on this site, don't they...?! :P

Ha! Many complain about how slow it is, given it is all volunteer responses/resolution to issues, etc. can take time. Glad this was all wrapped up fast, though. Also, striking out my initial notice. Feel free to remove it entirely. S0091 (talk) 18:15, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated!

Welcome RealisticIdealist1995!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,201,972 registered editors!

Hello, RealisticIdealist1995. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful:

The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia

A Primer for Newcomers

Introduction to Wikipedia

Wikipedia Training Modules

Simplified Manual of Style

Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:

1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly

2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources

3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources

Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia
Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia
Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 18:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Overlinking

Hi RI95, and welcome to Wikipedia. I have just noticed your edit to David Marr (journalist). You created blue links to the words journalist, journalism, author, social commentator, law, Australian politics, censorship, mass media, barrister, solicitor, psychiatrist, violence, culture, drug and law reform. You appear to be under the impression that where a word or expression is used in an article, and another article of that name exists, a blue link should be created to lead readers to that other article. If that is your impression it is incorrect. Wikipedia discourages the practice of overlinking – use of excessive and unnecessary blue links. Please have a look at MOS:OVERLINK. For example, MOS:OVERLINK identifies a number of areas that are usually not linked – common occupations is one of them.

A useful test is to ask yourself whether a person reading the article is likely to already have an understanding of the word or expression you are contemplating linking. For example, if you ask yourself whether a person reading the article David Marr (journalist) is likely to already have an understanding of the words journalist and journalism, you will probably decide that such a reader doesn’t need a blue link to either of those words. Similarly, a person reading about David Marr is likely to have no need of a blue link to help them comprehend law, Australian politics, censorship or mass media.

Wikipedia relies on inciteful and diligent new Users like yourself so please keep up the good work. Dolphin (t) 09:37, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Category:Anti-nationalists has been nominated for discussion

Category:Anti-nationalists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Presearch (talk) 19:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anti-nationalists

A tag has been placed on Category:Anti-nationalists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

per WP:G4 - previously deleted category recreated without justification

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Presearch (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Galloping Foxley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Routine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider applying edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 08:59, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sublime (philosophy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please preview, consolidate, and summarize

Hello, and thank you for your efforts here. Below are a few editing suggestions to make it easier for you and others to collaborate on the encyclopedia. Please preview, consolidate, and summarize your edits:

Try to consolidate your edits, at least at the section level, to avoid cluttering the page's edit history; this makes it easier for your fellow editors to understand your intentions, and makes it easier for those monitoring activity on the article.
- The show preview button (beside the "publish changes" button) is helpful for this; use it to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits.
Please remember to explain each edit with an edit summary (box above the "publish changes" button).

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 15:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Really thanks, or "just kidding" thanks? Your contribution history. Eric ^talk 04:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider signing your posts; thank you.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 16:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overcategorization

Please see Wikipedia:Overcategorization. Editor2020 (talk) 02:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Voices from the Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mozi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Authenticity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 13:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julian Jaynes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling on Hepburn category

Hello - Posting this to both User:RealisticIdealist1995 and User:Kjell Knudde - You were both recently involved with creating/editing Category:Cultural depictions of Katherine Hepburn. Let me point out that Katharine Hepburn's first name is spelled Katharine. Easy mistake to make; Thanks for all that you both do on WP. KConWiki (talk) 14:18, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paper, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to clean things up, not vandalise anything. Please chill out.

Then use an WP:Edit summary because it appears to be vandalism without any other explanation. Praxidicae (talk) 16:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

👍🏻

edits like this are also redundant and overkill. Praxidicae (talk) 16:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Connolly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presenter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:36, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John de Lancie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Director and Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kana Tsugihara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Audi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circularity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maximilien Robespierre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Hello. I see you have been contacted about this before. Please take another look at the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking guideline, particularly the section MOS:OVERLINK. Thanks. Barret (talk) 22:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bryan Magee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadcaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Postmodern philosophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Objectivity and Presence

Bracha L. Ettinger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Spiritual

Jakob Sigismund Beck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Synthesis

Luce Irigaray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Identity

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Intellect (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Enlightenment

Jakob Sigismund Beck (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Synthesis

Postmodern philosophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Presence

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Integral theory (Ken Wilber), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Body (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Benjamin Franklin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean Baudrillard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michel de Montaigne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Over-linking and over-categorization

I have reverted your recent edits at Michel de Montaigne, per WP:OVERLINKING and WP:OVERCATEGORIZATION. If you persist in these types of disruptive edits, you may be blocked. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:54, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I reverted your unhelpful edits at Voyages extraordinaires. Eric ^talk 00:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't understand the problem. I thought I was contributing. Can you please be more specific? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RealisticIdealist1995 (talk • contribs) 14:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The problem has been explained to you by many users over the past 9 months, all of whose advice you have apparently chosen not to heed. And you have received many bot notifications regarding careless linking to disambiguation pages. Your editing pattern is disruptive and creates a lot of clean-up work for your colleagues here, to name just a few: @Dolphin51, Presearch, Pdebee, Editor2020, Deacon Vorbis, KConWiki, Praxidicae, and Robert.Allen: The next step may be for us to visit WP:ANI or WP:AIV. Eric ^talk 15:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Since I got pinged on this comment, let me mention that I see no reason to think that the above examples are not Good Faith Edits. I will concur that using some care when linking to common phrases that could be disambig pages is a good idea, and also being aware of which categories are sub-categories of others is important. But I want to encourage RI95 to continue their interest in Wikipedia editing, perhaps with some adaptations to specific types of edits they work on. (I have adapted certain of my assumptions of what makes a good edit over the years, and I'm sure many others have as well). Thanks to all for their contributions. KConWiki (talk) 18:09, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I strongly disagree. The fact that this user has not repaired links to numerous disambiguation pages, when notified by a bot, demonstrates a lack of good-faith editing. --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you, Robert, they were all Good Faith Edits. I am a newbie to Wikipedia editing, and no harm was ever intended.

July 2020: Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Edie. Repeated disruptive editing may result in the loss of editing privileges.

You just reverted my reversion of your overlinking and overcategorizing of philosopher James Edie. Edie was one of my professors, I have read his work, and these categories significantly overreach his areas of specialization and interest. You have been warned repeatedly about this sort of editing. Please remove your last edit to James Edie. -- WikiPedant (talk) 20:31, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would love to help you become an authorized editor

Your red links are telling experienced editors you are a newbie. First off, write something, anything on your subscriber user page. And the red color on your user name will disappear. Need more help? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lboXszyY2ttPM2M29TWlbBelGx0GnvSvv5AJFbWrCg4/edit sheridanford (talk) 18:36, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Cave, you may be blocked from editing. Eric ^talk 13:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joe Nickell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Investigator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cultural depictions of Ava Gardner has been nominated for deletion

Category:Cultural depictions of Ava Gardner has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 22:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ecophenomenologists has been nominated for deletion

Category:Ecophenomenologists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Malawian innovators has been nominated for deletion

Category:Malawian innovators has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Belgian Taoists

A tag has been placed on Category:Belgian Taoists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]