User talk:Salty1984

Welcome!

Hello, Salty1984, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please do not remove {{stub}} templates from articles which are clearly short enough to qualify as stubs. Thank you. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 14:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Barclay

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jamie Barclay, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish Division Three

When you removed the proposed deletion for Jamie Barclay, you claimed that SD3 is "a FULLY professional league". This is clearly not the case. Both the second and third divisions are semi-professional and it is well known that East Stirling players were paid £10 a week at one stage. In future please do not create articles on players who fail WP:ATHLETE. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 13:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we are aiming to delete the articles on all players who have not played above SD2, as they all fail WP:ATHLETE.
It is not fully professional. There are no ifs or buts.
There should be no articles on Football Conference players either - these are also deleted.
I am aware that there are some full time clubs in SD2, but it is not a fully professional league.
I am not belittling your football league (though the SFL could do with some improvments, such as regionalising D2 and D3) and the fact that I haven't heard of him is irrelevant - I expand articles on people I've never heard of all the time, on the basis that they meet the notability criteria.
We generally accept that players who have played in a cup game for a club in a fully pro league meet WP:ATHLETE. If Barclay had played in a cup game for Falkirk, I wouldn't have nominated him for deletion.

пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 15:42, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Football player infoboxes

Hi - I see that when updating player infoboxes you have been removing the {{0}} template. This is there so that the columns (tens & units) line up properly. Could you please review and revert your edits? Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Hamilton Academical F.C. players

Hi there, I have noticed that you have an interest in Scottish football and have been editing articles relating to Hamilton Academical; any help I can get with this page would be much appreciated! Regards, Giant Snowman 15:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment I'm going through the Accies player category to find players with existing articles, and using stats from Neil Brown site. But, unfortunately, with uni work I've kind of ground to a halt...cheers, Giant Snowman 19:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David MacLeod

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article David MacLeod, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Football who fails WP:ATHLETE because he has not participated in a fully professional competition. The highest level he competed at was in the Scottish Football League Second Division, which is semi-professional.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-edit war message

Hi there SALTY, VASCO here,

Regarding this article, i have some comments on your inputs, as you had to mine: i was only trying to insert the club's fullname, Falkirk F.C., as an extra piece of info, especially in storyline, where it did not take up the space it would in infobox.

In a related note, you said (with "rolling eyes") that it's implied that FC appears in a club's name; well, i don't know all the names of English clubs, but there must be one without the "FOOTBALL CLUB", and even if there isn't, football is not exclusive to the British Islands. Take a look at another club MALLO played in: Deportivo de La Coruña, this and several others have pretty different denominations.

All in all, i'll wrap it up by saying i respect your choice and, since i hate edit wars, will not revert your inputs again. Hopefully you'll see my views too.

Happy editing, take care, from PORTUGAL - --NothingButAGoodNothing (talk) 03:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Kevin Budinauckas

A tag has been placed on Kevin Budinauckas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:32, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Reason For Paul Coutts At 21:39, 27 April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Paul Coutts. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your comment towards the editor could be seen as a personal attack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukeyboyuk (talk • contribs) 23:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Allan Jenkins dab

See Wikipedia:Requested moves.

Myself and another editor, occasionally treading on each others' feet, went Be Bold and moved this around to get roughly what I think you wanted. Showing good faith I also added Allen Jenkins.

I think this is pretty much what you wanted, but is not what you asked for and I said so. I think it is probably the best solution but there's no point in an editor saying done & dusted if you are not happy with it.

Can you help me, I was unsure whether to put Scots or Scottish. Since it's the "Scottish Football League" I went with Scottish, but usually I would say Scots, cos that's what my Scots friends prefer. (Never Scotch of course, only eggs and whisky are scotch). What would you prefer? Of course you can edit it yourself, just for my own reference in future. SimonTrew (talk) 12:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to ask if you could please be mindful of the amount of {{0}} templates you're adding to infoboxes? For example, you've added one set too many on Laurent D'Jaffo. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 22:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for this template is that the stats are merely able to line up to the correct amount (ie 10s, 100s all match up on the same column). Mattythewhite (talk) 12:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Junior footballers

I think this will need to be specified more, as "junior footballers" sounds a bit vague. Something like "Scottish Junior Football Association players" would be better IMO. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan McWilliams

A tag has been placed on Ryan McWilliams requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cheers, Mazeau (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

The term senior career means all clubs played for as an adult and not senior clubs (ie. not junior) as in the Scottish sense. Bully Wee (talk) 13:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fillipo Inzaghi

Yes but look at Giggs. He's got something similar on his page for his mention on The SImpsons. Not everyone likes The Simpsons do they? So really, it doesn't matter, and as i said before, it is giving a off-field touch to the page. (User:Stt13) (talk) 21:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm terribly sorry. Wrong guy. Sorry buddy (User:Stt13) (talk) 14:32 3 September 2009 —Preceding undated comment added 05:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Romeo Filipovic

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Romeo Filipovic. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:BigDom. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. -- Big Dom 21:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Caven

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Joe Caven. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Iain Davidson

Sorry to have you kept waiting....

there is nothing worth saving in the deleted content (one of these "I'm the greatest guy" etc. articles), so edit away.

Cheers and toodle pip,

Lectonar (talk) 17:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen McNally (footballer)

The article Stephen McNally (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATHLETE, as he does not play at the fully professional level

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PDCook (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Hi,

I've created a new userbox for you and replaced the text you had at the top page with it (we're not really meant to include things like that on user pages even if it's mostly harmless). Cheers for your work on Ayr biographies, much appreciated. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Club season articles

Thanks for the query. I moved the article to its new title at 2009–10 Greenock Morton F.C. season to bring it in line with the consensus reached by the Season Article task force (see here). At the same time, I moved all the articles in Category:Scottish football (soccer) clubs 2009–10 season and Category:Scottish football clubs 2010–11 season to the same format, so I don't understand your comment about moving "no others (e.g. Clyde's)".

By the way, please don't refer to an article as "my season pages" – anything on Wikipedia is open to each and every user to edit; that's its very nature: we don't own anything no matter how much time and effort we put in. Best wishes and good luck for next season. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:00, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally every season from the very beginning should have the title in the correct format, but I don't have the time. Hopefully, other editors can carry on where I left off. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 04:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fouad Bachirou

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Fouad Bachirou. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Barr

Hello, I've declined your CSD request on Bobby Barr's article. Please see the link for more details and ask if you have questions. Best, Airplaneman ✈ 02:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ahmed bin Ali Stadium, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. -Gump Stump (talk) 16:50, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Jonathon Tiffoney

Hello Salty1984. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jonathon Tiffoney, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. nancy 21:27, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Todd Lumsden

The article Todd Lumsden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer. To merit a standalone article, he or she must meet the criteria stated at WP:NFOOTBALL , or the general notability guideline. This player passes neither of them.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Argyle 4 Life^talk 17:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Lumsden

Hello to you too! Where is this permission from admins that you mention? If true then I will have no problem accepting it. I stumbled on this article, and a few others, and was merely following the criteria which are laid out here and here. If a link to this permission was included on either of those pages then I wouldn't have nominated it. My knowledge of Scottish football isn't exceptional, but I know a fair amount for an Englishman and it will be a joke if they create an SPL2 and regionalise the lower divisions. Argyle 4 Life^talk 21:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That is fair enough. There are grey areas and vagaries in the criteria which I don't like. The Scottish First Division is one of them because I am sure there have been seasons when each team in the league has been professional, making it fully-pro. I hope the clubs group together and put as much pressure on the Glasgow bullies as possible (whenever I hear about Neil Lennon, he is complaining about someone). A 16-team league would be great. I've always liked Morton, funnily enough. My club has a unique name so I'd imagine that is the main reason. I'll remove the other two PROD's for First Division players, but one of them is in a sorry state. Argyle 4 Life^talk 21:52, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Scottish football transfers 2011–12

There is currently a debate going on about the List of Scottish football transfers 2011–12 on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football page concerning what flagicon layout is best, as you created the List of Scottish football transfers 2010–11 & are a heavy contributor to other pages of its kind your vote would be greatly appreciated although I respect your decision if you decided to refrain from voting. (DUCKISJAMMMY (talk) 04:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

July 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Conor Ramsay, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Giant Snowman 00:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR how about you stop displaying article ownership issues; removing a section because "I can't be arsed to update it" goes completely against the ethos of Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 16:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and please don't describe fellow editors as "annoying" - WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA etc. etc. Giant Snowman 16:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland task force invite

As part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Football, a Football In Scotland task force has been set up. As you edit articles on Scottish football, I would like to invite you to become a member. The task force is a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scottish football. If you would like to participate, please visit the task force page for details of how to join.

Warburton1368 (talk) 19:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Ridgers‎

It would of been polite courtesy to advise me you had applied for speedy deletion on the page. May not meet WP:footy but i feel meets GNG I have conteseted as i fell prod or AFD would have been a better avenue to take. Edinburgh Wanderer 20:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dont think you have nominated it correctly. Edinburgh Wanderer 21:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also he dosent have to have played in a fully pro league to meet criteria for inclusion in Wiki. Just needs to meet WP:GNG. Anyway he is likely to meet it in January has he is currently the only Hearts keeper contracted past then. Edinburgh Wanderer 21:54, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thats to meet WP:Footy there is a higher power called WP:GNG anyway a player may not meet wp footy but if meets GNG then is able to be included on the encyclopaedia. Anyway will be decided by AFD although you will need to fix it first. There are three forms of deletion Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion which you initially did which was wrong. Admin then prodded as shouldn't have been speedy. I contested both which i am entitled to do. You have taken to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion but have not done it correctly so at the moment isn't even being considered. I cant fix it as cant touch the template. Edinburgh Wanderer 22:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dominic Cervi

It really shouldn't be in there. There is a difference between national team and club team, whatever team a players contract is registered to should go in the infobox. National teams are different because no-one is owned by a national team, players are only eligible to play for them. Cervi has never represented the USA at full international level, only up to u23, so that should be listed as his highest national team. As for Jordan Rhodes; OTHERCRAPEXISTS. Adam4267 (talk) 18:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Nkono

Hi there SALTY, VASCO here,

when this player represented RCD Espanyol, the club was called RCD ESPAÑOL, name did not change until 1995 OK? Attentively, happy week from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 19:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gordon Smith

Just a polite note to advise I reverted your change to the infobox. I initially changed it as don't see why it shouldn't be there especially as no mention of it in the main body of text. On further looking with the sfa however he has made two appearances for the under 19-s. I will fully update the article later. Edinburgh Wanderer 13:48, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Greenock Morton F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andy Jackson, Peter MacDonald and David O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Mendes

Junior's additional caps came in the 2008 and 2010 Caribbean Championship qualification http://dcc.digicelfootball.com/news/15-dcc-game-8-st-vincent-the-grenadines-7-vs-monserrat-0 Embele (talk) 19:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Alistair Deans

A tag has been placed on Alistair Deans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Giant Snowman 10:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Benjamin Lee (footballer). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 11:55, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermakt is not a reliable source - it is user generated content. Giant Snowman 12:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS It's more reliable than the BBCSalty1984 (talk) 12:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is a player's agent going to be impartial? Course not. Please find a better source or I will remove. Giant Snowman 12:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please lose the crummy attitude, and don't describe the subjects of articles as "shit" - that's a serious WP:BLP violation. The WP:BURDEN is on you to provide evidence for your claims, not me. Thanks for finding a new source though. Giant Snowman 15:42, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and edit summaries like this should never appear again, if you'd be so kind. Giant Snowman 15:45, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. When you recently edited Maldives national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohamed Saeed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scottish stats

We rely on sources (even if you suspect they are slightly inaccurate) and not original research from people who were at games. Giant Snowman 10:11, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Try Soccerway, or Neil Brown for league stats - it's what I've done with Tony Stevenson as Soccerbase misses out an entire team! Giant Snowman 18:58, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: fanscruff

Have you removed these from all wiki pages? Celtic is just one page I found right away that lists doctors, kit controllers etc. The staff are listed on the official website so if you feel so strongly take it to the article talk page to get a consensus. Also who are sevco? Sparhelda 13:39, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Greenock Morton F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark McNally (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Morton

The table which you refer in Queen of the South season page is from Template:2013–14 Scottish First Division table. I have not got much of an opinion on the matter but do believe we should really have a consistent approach amongst all articles on naming.Blethering Scot 17:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Nade

I've asked (as have others) that the identity of Christian Nade's agent be removed from his wiki. 'irrelevant' doesn't even begin to cover it. Can you oblige please? - --82.41.251.96 (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlo Monti (footballer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tommy Burns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

‎Michael Tidser

Hi, Rotherham haven't officially confirmed their squad numbers for the new season yet so he could still be allocated anything. Cheers, Mattythewhite (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to FK AS Trenčín may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| league = [Slovak Super Liga]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salty1984. You have new messages at JanetteDoe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Reindorf

"Just because you play for a country's team doesn't make you that nationality" shows you have zero idea about how footballing nationality works - the only way you can play for X is if you have X nationality - if you disagree with the categories then please make your case on the article talk page. Giant Snowman 09:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hibernian

First of all its actually Fancruft so at least get what your trying to talk about correct. Secondly a massive POV comment such as about a team which nobody outside of Scotland has heard of, without any truth in it makes this even worse. Thirdly your ability to know what something is doesn't mean it is unworthy of an encyclopaedic entry in fact thats what this site is for, education and knowledge. I do not consider it to be fancruft and clearly neither did the even more longstanding editor than myself who added it. Please do not come to my talk page making poorly judged statements like your initial comments highlighted again, im however more than happy to discuss something properly without irrational statements if you wish.Blethering Scot 21:08, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Saidy Janko

Hi Salty, in regards to Saidy Janko we obviously both agree he fails WP:NFOOTY but I disagree with your assertion he passes WP:GNG as all the coverage he has received is based around his transfer which is considered no more than routine. I therefore would be of the opinion that he still fails WP:GNG. I thank you for letting me know that you contested the PROD. JMHamo has proceeded with an AfD nomination which I would have done myself had I been online. If you do improve the article to where it reflects that it passes WP:GNG, I would of course reconsider my position. Cheers ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ben Sampayo) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ben Sampayo, Salty1984!

Wikipedia editor Missionedit just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thnak you!

To reply, leave a comment on Missionedit's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Category:SPFL medal winners

I don't think this is an appropriate category. It's collating different competitions into one category. e.g. Category:FIFA World Cup winners is easy to understand and it's a defining characteristic of the individual. This isn't. See Wikipedia:Categorization. I'm afraid that I will have to raise this at WP:CFD. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salty1984. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 23:45, 15 August 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Deleting honours

Read WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:V, WP:BURDEN... Giant Snowman 10:39, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Denny Johnstone

Hello. I did, when I updated for the match on the 15th. I haven't updated for his game last night, took me long enough doing Birmingham's... But if you're gong to update him regularly, I'll leave him to you. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caolan McAleer

Incomplete stats tables (from players who have played in non-league/Junior/abroad) are a common occurrence, but we don't specify that in the heading. Giant Snowman 07:37, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Salty1984. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Caolan McAleer

Please provide a reliable source...you should know this by now. Giant Snowman 20:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Christopher Samba. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grow up. It was announced by the club, just didn't have time to add a reference. Salty1984 (talk) 07:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, you had plenty of time to add a reference. You could easily have added a reference with your initial edit, instead of relying on other people to do it for you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Salty1984. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Falkirk Stadium location

Hi, you've said the Falkirk boundary ends at the A9 - do you have any evidence to back this up? Because the Falkirk (North) council ward goes to the M9, as does the Falkirk census locality, and of course the stadium's address is Falkirk not Grangemouth. I'm just a bit surprised that its location hasn't been edited before now, especially as it is used on many other pages as well. http://www.falkirk.gov.uk/maps-local/council-democracy/ward-boundaries.aspx http://www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/ods-web/area.html

The address is 4 Stadium Way, Grangemouth. Salty1984 (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to the stadium's website: https://www.falkirkstadium.co.uk/contact or the Royal Mail's address finder: https://www.royalmail.com/find-a-postcode - so I'll ask again, do you have any evidence to back up your claim that it is in Grangemouth?

The official town boundary (the dashed line running roughly vertically) on the official OS map on the council's website runs through the car-park to the west of the stadium. Although the address is given as Falkirk, the stadium itself lies on the Grangemouth side of the town boundary. See the OS map, for yourself, here - http://www.falkirk.gov.uk/places/general-offices/falkirk-stadium.aspx 10:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Biography

Hey I saw you do some biographies of players Can you do a biography for Kamy Ntankeu Daniel as well If you need some information write me Danydu938@gmail.com Thanks Uchiwamadara96 (talk) 12:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Salty1984. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Morton

Hi mate, you ok? Notice you've not been updating the stats for the Ton recently. I know JJ isn't great but don't give up on them!

Seriously hope everything is good with yourself. CoatbridgeChancellor (talk)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Salty1984,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:01, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Salty1984,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Salty1984,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nathan Shepherd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathan Shepherd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Shepherd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 11:31, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Sun

Hi, regarding The Sun: RfC: The Sun and WP:WPFLINKSNO. To my understanding, rumours should not be on articles anyway. --Liamwpk (talk) 15:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at George Boateng, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you have been editing for quite a while. How come you are still making unsourced additions? Robby.is.on (talk) 18:16, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Hi there. You are right, I could have removed just the unsourced part. But I don't see how that excuses your edit summaries which have been less than civil? Especially when you twice had the opportunity to make sure the content you added was sourced and you didn't. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kilwinning Rangers F.C. squad

Template:Kilwinning Rangers F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 11:06, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen McNally (footballer)

The article Stephen McNally (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Joey Beauchamp, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox timestamps

Hello. When updating statistics within the infobox of a footballer, please make sure you update the timestamp at the same time, so that both readers and fellow editors know when the information was last updated.

You can do this by replacing the existing timestamp within the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats. For articles that use a DMY date format, use five tildes (~~~~~), or for MDY dates, use {{subst:mdytime}}. This will generate the specific time the update was made.

If you have any questions about this, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, Mattythewhite (talk) 14:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alfie Haaland, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle Thomson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Thomson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Thomson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 09:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eglinton F.C.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eglinton F.C. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 13:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eglinton F.C. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eglinton F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eglinton F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 09:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]