User talk:Sleepy Beauty

June 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to June 20 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: June 20 was changed by Sleepy Beauty (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890661 on 2017-06-20T16:17:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hong Kong Sports and Leisure Expo[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hong Kong Sports and Leisure Expo, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:27, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Your recent edit to July 27 added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that can only include notable entries. A person, incident, place, or organization must have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Please read this infoguide here about creating articles. Thank you. Quis separabit? 03:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated unconstructive edits can be deemed vandalism and will result in the loss of editing privileges, the term of which depends upon the severity of the editing violations. Quis separabit? 03:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at August 13 ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. For more information, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Days of the year and WP:CITE. Toddst1 (talk) 17:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at September 2, you may be blocked from editing. You have been warned multiple times about adding these unsourced entries or entries with no wikiarticles. Meters (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

1504 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Queen Isabella, King Ferdinand and Capilla Real

1899 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Henry Bliss

1956 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Dike

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1952, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethopia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sleepy Beauty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sleepy Beauty/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sleepy Beauty/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 23:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sleepy Beauty, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispe ring 23:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sleepy Beauty/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Sleepy Beauty/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:31, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1688, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Reading (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1689, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Convention Parliament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2003, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mformatt^{(So it goes.)} 19:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1527 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ferdinand I and Cetin

1799 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Wiesloch

1860 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Vulcan

1913 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Lemnos

January 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Charles VIII

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1527 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Ferdinand I and Cetin

1913 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Battle of Lemnos

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm McSly. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2012, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McSly (talk) 16:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cally Kwong[edit]

The article Cally Kwong has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 17:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages[edit]

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and added a source to back up your recent addition to June 10. Please try to find sources for additions to these pages as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cally Kwong 2010.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cally Kwong 2010.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1120 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Crusader

1895 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Italo-Ethiopian War

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding events to year articles[edit]

Hello Sleepy Beauty. I just wanted to pop by to thank you for your edits to the year articles. I realise you are often reverted by another user, but most of what you add is just fine, the majority of the time all you need to do is to link the event to the relevant Wikipedia article, this will assist the user in understanding the significance of most of what you're adding. Cheers, The Rambling Man (talk) 09:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The rambling man has given you bad advice. Read the policy yourself - don't take his word for it. This change is specifically relevant. Please keep up the good work but add sources as you go. Toddst1 (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's fine, just continue, and link the events. WP:V makes no such mention of explicit referencing on year article, this is something that has become a thing lately. If there's an article to link to, that's just fine. Take a look at our main page, for example, we don't cite a single thing there, yet it gets tens of millions of hits a day. We rely on our subarticles. Please continue, and realise that the issue Toddst1 is referring to is, in fact, completely different to the issue you've been continually reverted for. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1799 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Maltese

1993 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Endeavour

2009 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gaza War

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You were warned about adding unsourced content many times. You never stopped and you never responded to those warnings here. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:07, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sleepy Beauty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Anna : thank you for notifying me my mistakes. I merely just updating important events to the relevant dates or years. I had received a few messages from different adminstrators advising me of my doings. Thank you all and will be more careful in the future.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: this block has expired. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. When you say "more careful", could you be more specific? Thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would need you to not link to anymore disambiguation pages. I would need you to not add any unsourced information. Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violations[edit]

I have encountered possible copyright violations made just now, right after your block expired:

Your addition: [1]
The sources are among: [2] and [3]

You must know that copy pasting copyrighted content is not permitted, right? Please respond here. Please do not edit anywhere but here until this has been addressed. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:30, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More:

Your addition: [4]
Source: [5]

I am looking through your edits now. You know best where these copyvios are. Please help. Look through your contributions and remove copy pasted text. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How about this? Did you copy paste from here, or did they copy paste from Wikipedia? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:49, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 1931, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 02:48, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong: Too late. They were subsequently blocked and the block has since expired. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:04, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Emilienne Delacroix[edit]

Hello, Sleepy Beauty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emilienne Delacroix".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeung Hau Temple (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Hau Wong. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We already have an article that mentions this temple. It can be updated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yeung Hau Temple and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yeung Hau Temple, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert. Thank you for your review and comments. But there are a few Yeung Hau Temples in Hong Kong. This one is located in Tai O. Can this be created as a new page ? User:Sleepy Beauty/Sleepy Beauty

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cream, Soda & Milk has been accepted[edit]

Cream, Soda & Milk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satoshi Tajiri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Delinquent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia[edit]

Hi Sleepy Beauty. I work on conflict of interest and advocacy issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing. Your edits about "H. H. Dorje Chang Buddha III" and the International Art Museum of America reflect advocacy. While you wrote at ANI, First, I am not an COI., I am not really sure what you mean by that, or if you are interpreting "COI" the way that the community does. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Sleepy Beauty. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Comments and requests[edit]

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. Unmanaged conflicts of interest can also lead to people behaving in ways that violate our behavioral policies and cause disruption in the normal editing process. Managing conflict of interest well, also protects conflicted editors themselves - please see WP:Wikipedia is in the real world, and Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia for some guidance and stories about people who have brought bad press upon themselves through unmanaged conflict of interest editing.

As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with "H. H. Dorje Chang Buddha III", the movement around him, or the International Art Museum of America, directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. Please don't evaluate if have a COI or not - rather, please disclose any connections. After you respond (and you can just reply below), if it is relevant I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 19:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Mad Phoenix has been accepted[edit]

The Mad Phoenix, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sudden Appearance of Hope (Novel) (May 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Wikipedia is not a book review medium, and the plot of a novel must be described completely, including the conclusion. We don't run teasers. In addition, though the award may contribute to notability, we also need book reviews from references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements or websites

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Sudden Appearance of Hope (Novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Sudden Appearance of Hope (Novel), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 22:52, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Hong Kong people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bishop of Hong Kong (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary reminder[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!Deb (talk) 18:11, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

August 22 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Krishna Reddy

July 26 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Kline

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited August 22, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krishna Reddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tai O Yeung Hau Temple[edit]

Hello, Sleepy Beauty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tai O Yeung Hau Temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 05:53, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Sleepy Beauty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Sudden Appearance of Hope (Novel)[edit]

Hello, Sleepy Beauty. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Sudden Appearance of Hope".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited April 6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael O'Donnell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

onthisday[edit]

Onthisday.com is generally not a reliable source, especially for WP:DOY entries. They frequently take content from Wikipedia WP:DOY pages. Toddst1 (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]