Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 35

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36

flakjacket band

reasoning -Flakjacketrock (talk) 05:43, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

why has this been deleted? it is unfair and its the facts about a band for referance for the industry if thats the way you guys judge a input and just delete a referance page without first investigating the facts then count us out .....we will no longer use the wiki referance and anything we do from here about us on will be enforced with copyright laws of australia.....give a a break will you this is so ridiculas

  • Deleting admin's comment. Article was speedy deleted A7, no assertion of significance/importance. Message was left on user's talk page asking if there were reliable sources on the band, but they did not reply to that message. —C.Fred (talk) 05:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - As stated above by the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user C.Fred (talk · contribs). , this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please follow-up on his suggestion. --Tikiwont (talk) 07:49, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Chandra Courtney

It was deleted because questions were raised about its notability. I have no problem with this, but it was deleted before I even had a chance to flesh it out. It was deleted after only a few hours. The article was definitely in an embryonic state. But I think I should at least be given a couple of days to finish it. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully yours Robert Bernstein -Robertbrnstn (talk) 14:03, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done I understand your position but as an A7 deletion it can't be restored here. However, I would be happy to userfy it for you. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

MuPDF

I really think, that article about this excellent IMHO software will be very useful for many users -212.192.251.10 (talk) 19:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolf

Since the article was deleted, Dolf has since become notible. Dr. Patrick Chaplin was the first person ever to earn a PHD in darts and is the world leader in dart history. It was awarded by Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge – the title of his dissertation being: ‘DARTS IN ENGLAND 1900-1939 – A SOCIAL HISTORY’. He noted Dolf in his newsletter http://www.patrickchaplin.com/News%20Letters/Issue%2013%20April%202011/Dr.%20Darts%20Newsletter%20-%20Issue%2013%20DKONLINE.pdf on page 13. The references for Cricket (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cricket_(darts)) and Dartball (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dartball) appear don't appear to be as strong as this reference yet are considered notable. Cross referencing the notability guide lines, this reference to Dolf is meets the following:

The source is Reliable Source is a Secondary Source The source is independent of the subject It was mentioned by a reputable media/expert source

Please indicate the specific reasons to why you consider Dolf as not notable.

-Jasonbook99 (talk) 02:51, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G4. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user C.Fred (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
The issue has already been properly sent to deletion review; see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 April 3#Dolf. —C.Fred (talk) 03:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

brittany pearson

she has quite the fan following in her town and online and with the appropriate information could really have a page of value to your company. bring brittany back! free pearson! -Bmae120 (talk) 07:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

  • The article obviously wasn't encyclopedic, or even factual. This is a textbook example of a page created by someone about himself or his friend, and such pages get routinely deleted under the speedy deletion criteria for lacking any serious claim of notability, if for no other reason. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Hence, N Not done. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 11:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Brendan Gallagher

This article was deleted and now has been recreated, but all of its edit history is missing. It should have its past edit history restored also. -Fages (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done This has been deleted once as copyright violation and another time as mere redirect per Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_November_24#Brendan_Gallagher neither of which should be restored nor does the creation seem to rely on some previous history.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

DECT Forum

The article was not intended to be a advertising text. The association described in this article is a well reputed entity that e.g. takes care that people can use cordless telephones in most countries of the wordl. The association therefore negotiates with regulators, govenrment worldwide for frequency allocation. This is the main goal of the association which is a non-profit organization. I am happy to edit the article since it was my first one, but I belive thath the topic is worth to exist at Wikipedia. -RolSchmidt (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done This looks like a clear cut G11 as the page was completly promotional in tone and content. A quick google search suggests that there is more than a hint of copyvio too - see [1]. So not done and will not be done... Spartaz Humbug! 17:10, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Ron Allen (Canadian Musician)

Dear Deletion attendant. As a research journalist/educator of information regarding the lives of artists whom will likely influence humanities future notably through innovative achievements in the arts, primarily music related as I am an Ethnomusicology Professor and Neuro-Sonic researcher at an advanced teaching hospital. I have interviewed the artist in question thus obtaining new accurate information regarding the developments within various fields by this unusual artist. The original article, was a result of a few contributors including, it seems, a National newspaper, fans, and the management of the artists itself. I also noticed references from the Canadian Encyclopedia of Music, and my own publications. Until deletion, the article was used as initial reference by a few universities and collages, hundreds and more students. Although this artist has only sold 2 million CD's or so, the impact his work has literally saved hundreds of lives. Very rare indeed. The original article was a awkward scattering of verifiable facts that I myself verified easily. It should not have been deleted on that basis. Poorly written , maybe.

My intention now, is to revise and update it to bring the information in line with his recent contributions that go far beyond "musician:, a term that should be replaced by a more deserving title. We have a few other articles to contribute after this sadly deleted article is upgraded. I hope this request is simple and clear. look forward to your kind answer. NAMASTE Dr. Noor Yonidev -Yonidev (talk) 22:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Though it was deleted as an expired PROD this was a completely unsourced biography of a living person so I don't think it's wise to restore this to mainspace. I might be willing to incubate it but the better option would be to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Nicolai Boilesen

Made his professional debut in the Eredivisie championship today [2], and is thus notable as per WP:ATHLETE. -Poulsen (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The only text in the deleted article was Nicolai Boilesen (born 16 February 1992) is a Danish professional footballer, who currently plays for Ajax in the Dutch Eredivisie.. I think the best thing to do is to write a new article with reliable sources. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:53, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
What about the first version of the article (from November 2008 when he was playing in Brøndby IF), does that one have more information (I'm mainly thinking infobox)? Poulsen (talk) 05:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Moot. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Author Helen M Radics.jpg

I am trying to palce this image in the article titled Helen M Radics. Every time I do it it is deleted. I am the person who took the photo of Helen M Radics. She authorized usage of it. Please tell me how to do it. Thank yuo -Csidaranoli (talk) 19:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Every time I am trying to upload an image to my article Helen M Radics it is removed a few days later. I have tried to follow all the instructions but it is still deleted eventhough I have authorization from Helen M Radics for usage of the image and I am the actual person who took the image. Please let me know how to include the image in the article so it is not deleted. Thank you for your help -Csidaranoli (talk) 19:31, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

The problem was the restrictive license: "for iinternet usage, posting and media related subjects, articles." or "for usage on Wikipedia ". The material here has to be free for any use or modification. That includes publication in books, TV, and commercial use. I recommend a {{CC-BY-SA-3.0}} license. Also to prove any kind of permission an email should come from Helen M Radics, following the procedure in WP:PERMIT. You uploaded files at: File:Uagain.jpg File:Helenmradicsphoto.jpg File:Author Helen M Radics.jpg . Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

DECT Forum

article promotional -RolSchmidt (talk) 11:30, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Indeed. Which is why your request above was declined. Now you've created a new version and we move on from there.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Ted Whittall

This page was deleted because it was thought the person was/is of not much importance. This actor has a filmography that people may want to see. I think this page should be restored. -Jrhoda1 (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

It was deleted almost three years ago because a two line stub (as opposed to the person itself) did not assert much else than him having had a role on TV. If he meets WP:ACTOR, the bio still needs to be written.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:24, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Renee Pistone

sources were added and citations to the named author were added the article Renee A. Pistone did not have sources and was supposed to be deleted -Njrosalie (talk) 01:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I've deleted Renee A. Pistone. This might be discussed at WP:AFD. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Mechscape

MechScape has been recreated as a redirect and this is an alternate capitalization of the word -Pliigi (talk) 02:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done Redirected to Stellar Dawn like MechScape. JohnCD (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

60th National Hockey League All-Star Game

Objecting to PROD that was placed without notification -Dolovis (talk) 07:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. While I'm not sure that we already need it, I agree that prods without notifications are off-putting.--Tikiwont (talk) 08:32, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

The Deco Affair

The Deco Afair is renowned as being the place where new designers can meet the otherwise inaccessible elite of the industry. As as example last year 'Just Maude' a local clothing designer met the owner of Gucci and have since made her personally a dress, demonstrating that the deco affair really is somewhere where the impossible becomes possible! -109.148.68.46 (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user WikiDan61 (talk), who proposed it, in case they wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. If the article is to be kept, it needs references to establish notability by showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, and should avoid PR-speak like "high profile, "industry Guru" and "stunning". JohnCD (talk) 10:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Cinnamon_Chasers

Deleted due to copyright violation. Shouldn't it be possible to restore a version before the violation, and delete only the violating revisions? -Skyfex (talk) 11:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done. I have restored the pre-copyvio version. It's not clear that it meets the notability standard of WP:MUSICBIO, and if it is to be kept it needs references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. There were no references even in the later versions. JohnCD (talk) 13:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Ben Fairweather

reasoning -YouBenTV (talk) 19:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Article was deleted due to lack of sources, however i can provide sources now. So please undelete it so that it can be restored and i can cite my sources. Thanks

Not done You haven't told us the name of the article. See the big red error message. GFOLEY FOUR— 02:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. GFOLEY FOUR— 02:22, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Alaha Ahrar

this information is essential for women in Afghanistan -Kabul Afghanistan (talk) 00:35, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done. This article has been protected from creation because it has been posted so many times: you will have to contact user CactusWriter (talk · contribs), the administrator who protected it. It is copied from the UMW student newspaper, and so would need a formal copyright release, but in any case in its present form it is quite unsuitable: it is not an encyclopedia article, it is a chatty piece from a student newspaper about a 20-year-old Afghan student whose "dream has been realized" by coming to the US, how well she is doing, her hopes etc. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a notice-board for reprinting this kind of material. Please read WP:Your first article and the guidelines on WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 11:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Atty. Nikki De Vega

The article was deleted for failure to cite the sources. In this regard, please note that the sources of the article are cited below. Kindly reinstate the article. -112.201.230.162 (talk) 09:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC) www.ateneo.edu/index.php?p=120&type=2&sec=26 www.lawph.com www.manilastandardtoday.com/2006/mar/.../news05.htm www.pra.gov.ph/main/banks?page=1&pcat globalnation.inquirer.net/region/philippines/.../8-cops-face-theft-charges sc.judiciary.gov.ph/bar/law%20list/lawyer2006.htm www.tmagents.com/list_details.php?firm_no=602&user_no=96 services.inquirer.net/mobile/10/.../20100928-294845-xml.html www.intelproplaw.com/CZ/cz_get.cgi?CZ2017 www.lexisweb.com/Search.aspx?Query=&modifier...4 services.inquirer.net/print/print.php?article_id=20100928 www. iinvestforum.com/ www.abs-cbnnews.com/.../wife-beats-mistress-video-goes-viral en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DZRJ-AM www.philstar.com › News › Entertainment

 Done. I have restored the article, and "moved" it (changed its title) to Nikki de Vega in line with our normal style for article titles, which does not include professional titles. That gives you another 10 days to add references: please ensure that those you add actually mention the subject, as some of those you list do not seem to. JohnCD (talk) 12:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Please undelete Phire Dawson article

Phire Dawson was a model on the Price is Right and her history with the show and her current career should be present. She is also listed as a notable Spelman College Graduate, a historical black college. She is an actress on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, Bold and Beautiful, Jimmy Kimmel, etc. links below www.imdb.com/name/nm2137078/ http://www.imdb.com/media/rm485603328/nm2137078 Phire Dawson Wikipedia article is used as a reference for other online articles, news, and infomation, and links, but it redirects to The Price is Right page. Deleting editor, Querl has been contacted -smillie 10:42, 6 April 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fyra122 (talkcontribs) 10:42, 6 April 2011

Not done. The article was redirected as a result of a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phire Dawson, so it cannot be undeleted here. You have done the right thing by contacting Quarl (talk), the admin who closed the debate. If you cannot convince Quarl that the debate was wrongly decided, or that you have new information, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Correction: the user who decided the deletion debate in favour of redirecting is user Whispering (talk), and you should contact them about it. JohnCD (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Jean Shy

I received an e-mail answer today from the "Permissions" <permissions@wikimedia.org> help desk of Wikipedia and I was advised based on having cleared up the copyright issue that was in question, that I could either write a new Article, or ask for undeletion of my previous Article that was deleted. Therefore I would like to ask you to please undelete the previously written Article. I thank you very much in advance. Best regards. Tina Walker -TWA777 (talk) 07:33, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Multiblitz

comparable to Profoto article -Multiblitz (talk) 14:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I am the original author of this article and promoted the brand maybe a little too much. Nevertheless, the article about one of our competitors Profoto shows strong similarities, if not less content. I would appreciate if the source code of the article would be made available to make it possible for me to amend it into a proper form. The brand and company Multiblitz is well worth of an Wiki-article.

Yes check.svg Done Userfied by deleting admin. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
  • I worked on the article, how do I proceed further Deb? --Multiblitz (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
You filed a duplicate request for undeletion and as it has been answered by Deb I suggest you follow up with him. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Advance-logistics

The EU FP7 Advance project is actively running -82.157.188.13 (talk) 08:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Jason Impey

he is a British horror film director who has some major DVD releases coming out this year with major interest from horror film studios and distributors, he has a big fan base who wants to learn more about this individual, there is quite a bit of information on him on IMDB and as Wikipedia is a very good information site I think it is appropriate to have information on this director and his films as this site as many other directors of his kind on here and their films, some even smaller and who have done less films than Jason Impey. I have a certain amount of information on this director and the films his made that have caused quite a stir in the film industry if more information is required, he is referred to the English Andreas Schnaas, there are quite a few people I am aware of that are wondering why Mr. Impey is not on Wikipedia when quite a few people he has worked with are like Eleanor James, Emily Booth, Eileen Daly, GoreZone Magazine to name but a few. -Horrorfilmlover (talk) 10:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. the previous versions look to be autobiographies with reference from myspace. Do you have reliable sources to support the information? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:53, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I have many links to show of the work of Jason Impey and his movies, here as follows: The IMDB page I mentioned: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2563700/ Some of his films to purchase with customer ratings and reviews at amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=jason+impey&x=0&y=0#/ref=sr_pg_1?rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Ajason+impey&keywords=jason+impey&ie=UTF8&qid=1302186223 Sex Gore Mutants are a big genre film website that have done a lot of coverage on Jason Impey, here is a link to one of their many articles on him: http://www.sexgoremutants.co.uk/spot54.html A horror film fan site that has an interview with Jason Impey as a film director: http://deadlyindie.blogspot.com/2011/03/interview-with-director-jason-impey.html Jason Has also worked on many other film and TV shows such as the zombie film 'Colin' that was a huge hit at the Cannes fil festival and he also did alot of the video work for GoreZone Magazine in 2008 including there TV commercials. There are many other websites that have reviews good and bad of some of his many features such as the one below: http://www.fatally-yours.com/horror-reviews/tortured-aka-sex-slave-2008/ Thank you for your time. Regards George

Still Not done. IMDB is user-editable, and is not typically a 3rd party reliable source. Where's the Cannes reference showing him to be a "huge hit"? Having upcoming major releases is WP:CRYSTAL, and Wikipedia is not a fansite. There has been no proven notability so far, but maybe soon based on what you say. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:49, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

How comes lots of people who have been in his films are on this site but not the man who made them himself he is more important to the films than the cast? It is not fan information but information about a British filmmaker who has made over 14 feature films all shot in England with independent fiance which is a first, has not been done before, he is trying to bring exploitation filmmaking into the UK film scene to a wider audience and has interesting facts about how his films have been made and how they have caused outrage. The film Colin I mentioned is already on this site that Marc Price directed who Jason worked with on the film and worked with him before had at a TV studio - Princess Productions. Here are more links to prove his track record and what he has achieved: BBC Website: http://www.bbc.co.uk/filmnetwork//users/5516507 Public feedback on some of his films: http://www.rateitall.com/i-1333568-jason-impey.aspx Big films he has made and worked on including films at Cannes: http://kemalyildirim.com/?page_id=747 http://kemalyildirim.com/?page_id=542 http://kemalyildirim.com/?page_id=34 More Information on his career: http://exploitationpictures.blogspot.com/2011/03/latest-news-from-director-jason-impey.html?zx=ace4fdf27bffe3f7 http://trashfilmaddict.blogspot.com/2010/02/persona-talented-mister-impey.html?zx=a8b7195c3bf790f9 Reviews of his films: http://raculfright13sblogotrasho.blogspot.com/2011/03/jason-impeys-turning.html http://www.fatally-yours.com/horror-reviews/tormented-2010/ http://www.trashvideo.org/zmdb/view/artist.php?id=18362 http://www.horrorsociety.com/2011/03/30/psychopaths-2010/ His official website: www.jasonimpey.co.uk

Shonga Farms

Article was deleted for violationg section G11. I would like to review and get article userified -Salamanda1 (talk) 13:38, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Richfield Hospitality, Inc

it was a page on the company's history. Says page was deleted becuase of advertising - not sure how providing company history is advertising/spam. -Scrfhos (talk) 16:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Stuff lifted from a corporate site will often look like a "designated vehicle to spearhead new business initiatives" to the uninvolved reader.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

LogZilla

OTRS ticket 2011031710001361 confirms permission for content from http://www.logzilla.pro. -Adrignola (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done VernoWhitney (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

BIG4books

was deleted "because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant:". I did not have a chance to modify the article before it was deleted. The subject of the article is important to the thousands of people who are currently using it. It was, we believe, a pioneering effort to help millions of small businesses worldwide during a significant economic downturn. If you could 'userfy' or restore the article I will enhance it. Thanks. -Mrichards43 (talk) 17:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Mrichards43/BIG4books. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact RHaworth (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Chicago, IL district maps

I'd like to ask the restoration of the following maps of Chicago, IL districts as they've been erroneously deleted with no replacement in Commons. Some files' original name might've had a lowercase extension (as it's the case with CA07 for instance), but I don't know which.

-CoolKoon (talk) 12:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Only for the last one, CA50, was "image exists on Commons" the deletion reason - all the rest were WP:CSD#F4, lack of licensing information, which probably applies to CA50, too. If they are restored, can you provide appropriate licensing information? - otherwise they will just be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 12:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Well, since the remaining images (which were not deleted) are tagged as "PD-ineligible", I'd say that these could be tagged the same way as well. CoolKoon (talk) 13:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
All  Done - over to you to tag them. JohnCD (talk) 22:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Ch interpreter

I believe the entry on the interpreter was deleted by mistake; at any rate, the piece was useful for computer programmers who wished to know more about the interpreter and have the hyperlinks it provided. -Garykline (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ch_interpreter, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Spartaz Humbug! 05:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Template:Cenozoic Footer

A vital template for article: Cenozoic Era. -120.127.93.243 (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_6#Template:Cenozoic_Footer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RL0919 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. The suggestion was to use {{Geological era}} instead. Spartaz Humbug! 05:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Bob Gittens

I (Granddaughter) can identify awards received by Bob Gittens to confirm notability as a broadcaster in Trinidad and Tobago as I visited his family home throughout March 2011. Also willing to contribute images and updates. Original reason for deletion was: "18:37, 8 September 2010 BigDom (talk | contribs) deleted "Bob Gittens" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: While I can find minor mentions confirming that Gittens was an announcer in the 1950s, I cannot find reliable sources showing his notability." -27.32.50.190 (talk) 14:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. As it was unsourced and all mentions seem to be in the context of the radio station, I've redirected it for now to Radio Trinidad. Before updating, please review our guideline on notability and also this for family members.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Hail of Bullets

This band is notable and the article shouldn't have been deleted- I have no idea why it was deleted but they have released three albums on a notable label, Metal Blade Records (verify in http://www.last.fm/music/Hail+of+Bullets/+albums , and thus comply with the notability standards of Wikipedia in WP:BAND. If this information wasn't included in the article it should be added. -Thisistimothy (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

  • the sum total of the deleted content was Hail of Bullets is a Death Metal band from the Netherlands. The band is fronted by vocalist Martin van Drunen of Asphyx and was forned in 2006. Their lyrical content deal with World War 2. To date, they have released 2 albums (...Of Frost and War and On Divine Winds). I suggest you just go ahead and write a new page. Spartaz Humbug! 08:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Gammadyne Mailer

This is a well written, informative, accurate, and unbiased article about a popular program. There is no conceivable reason to delete it. -Grozo (talk) 18:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Grozo/Gammadyne Mailer.. It did not assert notability to the deleting admin, User:DragonflySixtyseven, and in user space you can maybe improve it further, to avoid that it gets proposed for deletion or sent to WP:AFD-. -Tikiwont (talk) 20:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

The Medusa Plot

don´t delete this page!!!!!!!!!!!! -Santcruz (talk) 20:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. If you can't edit more content and references now, it might rather become redirect to the series till the book gets released, though. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Falling In Reverse (From Behind These Walls)

i would like to request that this page be undeleted becuase the information provided is the start of the page as i am still gathering more refrences and more information, and i need to link the page to other band pages, becuase members of the band are from well known bands such as Escape the Fate and Lovehatehero which both have wiki pages -Danielronnieradke (talk) 23:49, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user JohnCD (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. I note that John had already advised you on coi. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Porchcrop/Wikipedia talk:Antiquette/Archive

This is a page that is a copy of a talk page of a page I have created. The content is not abusive and I have kept it in a userfied version. --Porchcrop (talk|contributions) 07:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Well you didn't mention that your page and its talk page was deleted per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Antiquette. As was the draft per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Porchcrop/Antiquette with it. Nor did you explain which eventual benefit there might come from keeping the talk page copy around. Obviously, you're left with the usual options, convince the deleting admin, DRV or simply move on.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

File:1946 Nankaido earthquake rupture zone.png

this is not my image, but it's a worthwhile topic and I would like a chance to save it -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you as always!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

The Flaming Tsunamis

I Need The Information On This Page to Figure out the correct information for this band in a music library -99.190.48.129 (talk) 05:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

It was a US-experimental-band stub sourced exclusively to their own sites such myspace. If that doesn't answer your question, please let us know how we can make a copy available to you or whether you think that there should be an article on them.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
well what i'm really looking for is the the albums they have and the year and track listing for each, if it could be written here or emailed to me that would be great.
Yes check.svg Done Sent to the (redacted) e-mail. No track listings, though.--Tikiwont (talk) 11:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks - slipknotkid014

The Oregon Herald (website)

reasoning -R Metcalf — Preceding unsigned comment added by R Metcalf (talkcontribs) 01:15, 11 April 2011

X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:37, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Angie Mason

This artist is notable having exhibits internationally in galleries and museums. She has Tens of thousands of links on google which claimed she only had 787 hits but simply isn't true. If you google you will see the thousands of links to this artist. The article that was deleted also said it broke copyrights but as the artist Angie Mason I had added that link we can simply remove that link and reinstate the article if it is some how offensive. It has been a part of wikipedia for years I would hate to see it deleted after years of having students write reports for their projects for their art classes which utilized this article. -173.63.148.212 (talk) 04:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done Wikipedia is a free content project - which means we don't use text belonging to other people in our artices. There was a deletion discussion over 5 years ago but I'd suggest you simply rewrite the article in your own words citing any sources you have. We don't ever undelete copyvios unless the text in question has been released on a free license. Spartaz Humbug! 17:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality_factor_(video_compression)

The quality factor calculation, also called the Compression Quality factor is used in tools such as GSpot to calculate the quality factor of encoded video. The formula given is accurate and is currently in use, albeit not in a widespread manner. Nonetheless the information is interesting to have to see how the calculation is done. Also look at the documentation regarding CQ in the mencoder documentation, section 7.1. Making a high quality MPEG-4 ("DivX") rip of a DVD movie. -Ccodere (talk) 01:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

List of convicted Jewish criminals

per "List of convicted Australian criminals" and "List of Jewish Nobel laureates" -Bob19842 (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done and will not be done one names does not a list make and this seems an unsuitable subject for a list too... Spartaz Humbug! 17:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

I had just started adding names when it was deleted. Can you explain why list articles favorable to Jews are suitable while list articles unfavorable to Jews are unsuitable? Bob19842 (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

It isn't a question of un/favorability, it is an issue of whether such a categorization of people by ethnic/religious background and criminal activity is notable or important enough for a Wikipedia entry. For the record, I was against the "Jewish Nobel laureates" list as well, as there's really nothing particularly notable about being a Jew and being a Nobel prize winner, but those sorts of articles see quite a bit of a herd mentality to keep them protected. Being Jewish and being a criminal isn't a noteworthy intersection of information either, but just because the laureate article was kept, that isn't a valid criteria to keel the criminal article. "Two wrongs don't make a right", and all. Tarc (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
(e/c) Not done Actually, I think List of convicted Australian criminals pretty clearly should be deleted and may prod or take that to AfD. There are so many reasons why any list of ethnicity criminals is inappropriate that even where to begin is difficult: Attack page, indiscriminate intersection, unbounded list... I'm not sure that List of Jewish Nobel laureates shouldn't be deleted s well but the analogy to it is false. For one, that is a sharply finite list and requires no judgment calls to know what to include. Your idea of balancing one against the other, besides appearing to be an other stuff exists fallacy, makes me think you may have an agenda and I'll leave it at that. In any event, this page is only for undeletion of pages deleted uncontroversially, such as under CSD g6 as housekeeping or articles that were prodded. We do not undelete pages that are deleted as this one was as an attack page or as a duplicate topic. That is the province of deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
You make an excellent point that hadn't occurred to me. Forgetting other possible issues, the list of Nobel laureates is verifiable and definable. There is no verifiable way to define where the boundaries are of any "list of convicted [ethnic group] criminals". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Exactly. Where do we start to define who to place on such a list as this one. Do we include every scientist, actor, engineer, and musical artist who ever got a suspended sentence when they were 19 for shoplifting, right next to Meyer Lansky? Is it only for major crimes (whatever that means) for people who have Wikipedia articles, and are verifiably Jewish, and lived during the twentieth century? To even begin is to immediately get bogged down in how indiscriminate and unbound it is on its face. Anyway, I'm going to go create List of Zoroastrian jaywalkers of the nineteenth century.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Yes, wikipedia is crying out for such an article to fill that knowledge gap. It occurs to me that this is similar to debates about categorizing people as "Jewish", "Catholic", etc., in the leads of articles. "Jewish comedian", for example. Certainly Myron Cohen qualifies, because the focus of his act was ethnic Jewish jokes. Alan King often referred to his Jewish background, although it wasn't necessarily the major part of his act. Jerry Seinfeld is ethnically as Jewish as any of them, but he's not a "Jewish comedian" as such. So these lists can get pretty slippery. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 19:44, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

28bytes closed this discussion at ANI with

"There is no administrative action required here. If you believe an article has been unfairly deleted, go to WP:Deletion review."

But above, Fuhghettaboutit says

"this page is only for undeletion of pages deleted uncontroversially, such as under CSD g6 as housekeeping or articles that were prodded."

Who's right?

The OP may be critiquing the entire genre consisting of "List of Jewish ..." "List of African American ..." etc. Can anyone point to earlier discussions on this topic so the OP can review them; and what would be the right place for them to initiate another discussion, should they decide to? WP:VP/P? --Anthonyhcole (talk) 03:53, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Both are right, but this here is not deletion review but a simple page for uncontroversial restorations and restoring this list as uncontroversial has already been declined twice above. Feel free to follow-up at DRV, VP or with the user directly.--Tikiwont (talk) 12:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Aha. Thanks. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

BioBlu 27 alloy

The only factual information that results from a internet search about this cobalt alloy is from the alloy's manufacturer. I'm curious about what was on this page before it was deleted, since cobalt is considered to cause cardiomyopathy, contact dermatitis, and is a carcinogen, while the manufacturer claims that the alloy is hypoallergenic and surgical-grade. -32.97.110.53 (talk) 23:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

This page had been drafted and then been tagged for deletion by that author themselves, so I would not want to restore it or give too much weight on its content to start with. Maybe it helps if i post below all citations other than from the manufacturer itself:--Tikiwont (talk) 13:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Francisco, Lori. "Heavy Metal," Bridal Guide 2009-11-06.
  • Novellino, Teresa. "Smashing tungsten, Scott Kay intros cobalt bridal," Nationaljewelernetwork.com, 2009-10-29.
  • Edelstein, Cindy. "Tungsten Wedding Rings: Jewelry Designer Scott Kay Denounces Misleading Advertising Methods and Introduces BioBlu 27," Jewelry Business Guru, 2009-11-02.
  • Kremkow, Cheryl. "Breaking Tungsten Carbide," www.Cherylkremkow.com, 2009-10-29.
  • Heebner, Jennifer. "UPDATED: Scott Kay, Spectore, and Carpenter Technology Unveil BioBlu 27," JCK Online, 2009-10-29.

Post Randomonium

Article has thorough citations, and refers to a relevant site. Was deleted without discussion -99.73.190.86 (talk) 02:59, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Toddst1 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Lte me just note that of the citations, two seem to be from the site and the third not really about it.--Tikiwont (talk) 14:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Given the nature of criterion for speedy deletion A7 would it be possible for me to get this restored to the userspace instead then so that I can work on improving the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by User:Rabidmuskrat (talkcontribs)

Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Rabidmuskrat/Post Randomonium. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Toddst1 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Maxine Carr.jpg

File was acceptable under fair use and was unilaterally removed from its article without discussion and then speedy deleted without any notification -Lucy-marie (talk) 10:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done Its hard to fault the deletion and there are always real issues about using unfree content of living persons. I think that even being in prison isn't enough to say that its not FU Replaceable with a free image. This clearly isn't for REFUND. Your option is to discuss with the deleting admin and then go to DRV afterwards if you are unhappy after discussing with Scott. Spartaz Humbug! 13:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Dreher

The page has been recreated, but its history is missing -Peter E. James (talk) 23:12, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done. I have restored the history; however, this article was deleted for a reason: it was tagged "db spam. information merged into Anton Dreher" and then deleted per WP:CSD#G11. I will notify the deleting admin, Fastily (talk), and let him decide what to do. JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Part of it was merged into Anton Dreher, by the user who added the deletion nomination (this should make it ineligible for speedy deletion). A rewrite is probably needed, but the current article seems to be better than nothing. Peter E. James (talk) 20:03, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Ernie Halter

This musician has released multiple albums under Rock Ridge Music. Article was deleted before 2 albums were released. See [3] for verification. Please undelete it as it'll be much easier for me to start this article from scratch than from nothing at all- I intend to add to the article all relevant and important information about him . -Dragquennom (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done. I restored this article automatically as a contested PROD, but noticed that it was written in a very promotional and unencyclopedic style, more like a Myspace page than an encyclopedia article, so I checked and found that it was copied from here, and so is liable to speedy deletion as a copyright violation. So I have userfied it for you - moved it into a user-subpage at User:Dragquennom/Ernie Halter where you can work on it. We should not really be hosting copyright material even in user space, so please make it your first priority to rewrite the text in a much more factual style. JohnCD (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

PEPID Knowledge Base

OTRS permission for content from http://www.pepidknowledgebase.com received in ticket 2011041210012169. -Adrignola (talk) 01:37, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done. This was not deleted as a copyvio but per WP:CSD#G11 as unambiguous advertising or promotion. Any undeletion request should go to user Salvio giuliano (talk), the admin who deleted it. It has been submitted again today as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PEPID, and declined on grounds of promotional tone and notability. JohnCD (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Dice.jpg

bad transwiki to commons:File:Dice.jpg, I guess we not transfered the full quality version and the file description is very poor. Please restore and allow me to use the CommonsHelper and improve the transwiki, I will renominate the image for speedydeletion with {{nowcommons}} when I finished. -Martin H. (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done The wikipedia side should be back up. Mark it for deletion when you are done or just post here. Protonk (talk) 20:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Eastside Sun

Due to this publication's association with the federal charges being brought against several businesspeople, it would be beneficial to have some background in Wikipedia -68.178.97.106 (talk) 00:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastside Sun, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mkativerata (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Russell Hantz

Russell Hantz is believed to be the most popular and well known Survivor player there has ever been. Wikipedia has pages for TONS of Survivor players who I have never even heard of! This page was taken down for clearly some other reason than the fact that he is not notable enough. He is plenty notable! Ask anyone on the street who Russell Hantz is and they will know. This page should be reinstated! If not, then I will delete every other page for every other Survivor player there is, because if Russell can't have a page, neither can any other Survivor player. -205.211.50.10 (talk) 02:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Hantz (3rd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Court piece

This game is among the most popular card games in India and Pakistan and definitely needs an article. Variants are currently played in Iran, Suriname and the Netherlands, see Hokm. I will create a new article discussing all these variants together, but I think the history of this article should be available under the redirect as it should never have been deleted in the first place. See [4] for an online source; there should be offline sources as well. -Hans Adler 08:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Double Sar

This is a variant of Court piece (previous request) and also described on pagat.com, the standard work on international card games. I am not sure if this should become a separate article or remain a redirect, but in any case I would like to have the history restored. -Hans Adler 08:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Seems to have already been merged--Tikiwont (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Court Piece

Since card game names are often capitalised, this is a plausible redirect to Court piece or whatever the article on this game will end up as. (Currently there are articles on this game under Kot Piece and Hokm.) I am assuming that the redirect was going to one of these game articles. If there is no interesting history in the redirects, I don't mind keeping it deleted but will simply recreate it. -Hans Adler 09:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --Tikiwont (talk) 09:53, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Scooter Berry

On 16:24, March 30, 2009, User:Carlossuarez46 deleted Scooter Berry giving the reason "Expired PROD: Does not meet criteria for Wikipedia:Notability_(sports)#Amateur_sports_people or WP:ATHLETE.). However, the article had already gone through deletion review and was closed as "no consensus." It is my understanding that once an article has gone through DRV, it should not get a PROD tag on it. Granted, these were some time ago and some time apart--I don't believe there was any bad faith at all--but it appears procedure was not followed and the article should be restored. I would have no objection to notifying the editors involved and sending the article to DRV a second time. -Paul McDonald (talk) 13:43, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Regardless of the history, a contested proposed deletion is automatically restored on request. I will notify user Raeky (talk), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to consider taking it back to WP:AFD (note: not WP:DRV - that's the appeal process, and I don't think this article has been there). JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Tradyo

I understand your criticism's of the Tradyo page and I will make the necessary adjustments to it, but I cant because I have been locked out of the page. Could you unlock it so I can make the necessary changes so that it can be approved? I will edit the text to make it purely facts and no promotion whatsoever. -Mooshidog (talk) 17:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done. Quite apart from the promotion aspect, Tradyo is "in a private beta stage of development", but as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia only reports on things that are already well established, so that they can show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. See WP:CORP and WP:BFAQ for more detail. JohnCD (talk) 18:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Clergy Sexual Abuse Awareness Day

This is not self-promotion or advertising. This is bringing awareness to a major problem within all denominations. This is a trademarked name (application on file with the USPTO), and an event and awareness campaign that encompasses many people and organizations. Please reconsider and add the page back. I have more information and links to add to it now that will help keep it from appearing to be advertising. Thank you for your consideration. Samantha Nelson -SamanthaTHOS (talk) 17:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a notice-board for "bringing awareness". Please read Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion and Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. Also, I see no indication that this could meet Wikipedia's notability requirement to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 18:14, 14 April 2011 (UTC)