User talk:Biatch

The Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Barnstar awarded to Biatch, for his solid work on contributing articles to Wikipedia. Keep it up mate, R o gerthat ^Talk 06:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Malvern House

Thanks for the great photo. I've slightly tweaked the cpations' wording. Harr o5 08:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Town Halls

Thanks for your great contributions too, including other notable Melbourne buildings which I have seen popping up. I do seem to have covered a few in the north, although I get around most parts of Melbourne and always have my camera at the ready.--Melburnian 11:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne

Just dropped by to congratulate you on your excellent work on the Melbourne article - nice username, too :) Tpth 05:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

why thankyou. its a dirty job, but someone had to do it ;) --Biatch 01:13, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Balmain

Just saw your edit to Balmain. I've done a lot of work on the inner west articles and photo contributions and I'm wondering if the addition of a 'Gallery' section is the best way to go. There are numerous images of Balmain on Commons [1] and a while back I added the commons link box to the 'External Links' section of the Balmain article (and many others) so or readers can see additional pictures if they want to. Your pictures may be better suited as inline images in the article OR upload them to Commons with the other Balmain images for all to see if they want to. I'd be happy to help with the Commons upload if you need a hand. BTW, nice work on the Australian architectural styles article. amitch 11:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I'm only just starting to get my head around this whole commons thing and I much prefer to see images within the article so I know what it is talking about and can refer to them easily. Just a personal preference and I have seen it done on other articles. I have no idea where this sits in the Manual of Style however. --Biatch 01:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Username

You seem to have coped for most of a year with it, but ... I don’t really think your username is appropriate. Maybe you could be convinced to change it? —Felix the Cassowary 13:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On what grounds ??? --Biatch 05:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is very similar to an offensive term, and a common way to say it without saying it. To me, that makes it the same. —Felix the Cassowary 13:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is similar to the word for a female dog. I can't see what is wrong with that ? Would you prefer me to use the name of a female sheep or a female horse ? --Biatch 05:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne (suburb) article

Considering your focus on the Melbourne (suburb) article, I think I’ll let you know that User:Adam Carr attempted effectively to unilaterally delete the article. I’ve reverted his change and justified it on the article’s brand new talk page. I hope you don’t take my request for you to change your name against me :) —Felix the Cassowary 14:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rag trade

I reverted your change to Textile because the article as written isn't about the industry, but the material. I notice that Textile industry redirects there, and that is probably not ideal. You migth consider making Textile industry into a new article instead of a redirect. There is certainly enough of a cultural relevance that it should have its own article. — Saxifrage ✎ 23:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

good idea, that's exactly what I did. Cheers. --Biatch 07:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney terraces

Hi Biatch, just to let you know that as part of dismantling my old site I've put a couple of Surry Hills photos in the Gallery that I took in 2002 and a lovely substantial stone terrace in the Rocks that is as solid and new-looking as when it was built when Queen Victoria was still probably a babe! Wonder how many of todays houses will last a quarter that long!

Any hints on how to use the Commons? How do you add, search and link commons files when you're editing a page? Quite out of my depth there.

Cheers, Michael User:MichaelGG

Wish I knew ... I have asked many the same question but still haven't found the answers. I'll stick to doing what I know I think ;) --Biatch 07:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Collins Street, Melbourne

Thanks for your contributions to Collins Street, Melbourne, particularly the great photos. (I love Old meets new architecture in melbourne.jpg). Keep up the good work. Blarneytherinosaur talk 01:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You know what, I went back to visit the article after I read your comment and someone had removed it ! Their comment was that it didn't represent Collins Street ! That's wikipedia I suppose (but I am getting tired of arguing with some of the dimwits on this site and their perculiar views). Thanks again. Cheers. --Biatch 07:17, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bates Smart

I read the Bates Smart article and i'm a little confused. You said that when Smart and Reed died, they were replaced by Smart. So, who actually died? Or are they replaced by someone else?

Thanks for picking that up. lol. I'll see if I can provide some citations for that article. --Biatch 07:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane Terraces

Think I've just about found everything in Bris! No luck at Dutton Park, went for a big drive today, covered the area from the cemetery down to West End. Ended up on Edomonstone Street. The reason I was looking in Dutton Park was because the Professor from the Brisbane Institute who wrote an article about the Undue Subdivision of Land Prevention Act says in his own page in the Brisbane Institute website that there are a few examples of terraces at Spring Hill etc etc etc and .. "a twosome at Dutton Park". I'm wondering if he has got his parks mixed up, as the Edmonstone ones overlook Musgrave Park and are 2 pairs, the one I put on the wiki page and the rather plain jane pair next door.

Still, I'll have another drive before I give up! Cheers MichaelGG

I think you may be right there. --Biatch 07:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks re Fisherman's Bend - the only changes I made were to standardise the infobox and put the geocoords in external links, so no harm done :) Orderinchaos78 08:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Queenscliff Victoria

Found my photos from the trip in 2002, thought I had lost them and put in a gallery. Note there's a photo of Fort Queenscliff lurking somewhere in the system because it popped up in my gallery, identically named "Fort Queenscliff.jpg" so I changed the name of mine as it's a nice sunny picture taken on one of those glorious crisp spring days that only Victoria can put on! (9 degrees in the morning and 34 in the afternoon) - MichaelGG

Michael, I reused one on the terrace house article and another on the coffee palace article. Cheers. --Biatch 04:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cheers Michael

Port Phillip 10,000 Map

Thanks! I don't receive much congratulations on WP. I've been making a fair few maps for things that didn't have proper maps before. The map of Port Phillip 10,000 years ago is actually quite crude, but at least we've got a basic map of what the area would have looked like just prior to flooding. I noticed you study architecture? Where are you studying and how are you finding the course? Been studying much sustainable building? Nick carson (talk) 06:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I finished my course at UQ. By the way, I'd like to add your image to the article on Port Phillip if I may because I think it is relevant there. --Biatch (talk) 06:56, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you added it, all good :] I used MS paint to create it, just because its a very simple program, if a little time consuming. I'd recommend using photoshop or aperture. Just remember that the only job worth doing is a job well done, try to be inclusive and encompassing but concise, make sure it's clear and easy to read too :] Nick carson (talk) 10:02, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Urban structure of Melbourne

You removed a quote I added to the Melbourne article last year. Part of it was:

In the 1930s many larger buildings were constructed in the outlying border area, several with a characteristically "art deco" crown—a short tower of cantilevered awnings which serve only a graphical purpose—forming the apex.^[1]

I thought this was useful, as the source is an article about photographing the city. Ottre 07:49, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Doesn't belong in the main article. But could go in the urban structure sub-article. --Biatch (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Vic fires

Hi Biatch, You have deleted tow background sectiosn on the fires. Building codes and climate change. The relevance of climate change is that these are the first major fires since the BushfireRC published its report and the CSIRO published theirs predicting increased severity of bushfires. These fires occurred during record temperatures. The fire union has expressed concern about climate change as a result of these fires. This is relevant background. Note I have not alleged specific causation. The relevance of building codes is that this is the greatest loss of life in a bushfire in Australia, many in their homes. Other states have already introduced specific codes for bush fire prone areas and the difference in opinion and current standard re temps is relevant background in understanding the scale of loss of life as the national standard is presently being debated I will reinstate the sections as background.dinghy (talk) 21:04, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant to bushfires in Australia article, not just the 2009 fires and is bordering on POV as it pushes an agenda - not encyclopedic. --Biatch (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne

I wish you luck fixing the article back up again! I've given up and it's a sad shame to see the article being edited to low standards[2]. Bidgee (talk) 11:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know it sucks. Was a great article, but idiots keep ruining it. --Biatch (talk) 12:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graphs

I've noticed that you have created a few graphs such as File:Melbourne metropolitan public transport usage.jpg. Since they're JPEG images representing simple line data, there are pretty noticeable compression artifacts visible. Is there any chance you could save the graphs in PNG (or SVG if you have the tools) format, which would result in a much better quality? The graphs are a great addition to the articles they appear in, but the quality gets a bit annoying (or maybe it's just me who really notices that stuff). invincible (talk) 16:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne tram extension proposals

Thats a good map. Will you be making a similar one for trains? If so be sure to cross-check with the 1969 Melbourne Transportation Plan and its map. LamontCranston (talk) 04:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eastlink Light Rail Reservation

You've made a pretty big claim there: "When the Eastlink roadway was in planning, the State Government created a reservation for a future heavy or light rail corridor and conducted a feasibility study into a light rail system to service the outer eastern suburbs. However the road became tolled and light rail did not eventuate."

But the only thing the factsheet you cite says about rail at all is "EastLink allows for future public transport initiatives including bus services and heavy and light rail."

I'd say there is a bit of a discrepancy there. LamontCranston (talk) 04:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Launceston, Tasmania

Thanks for your contribs to the art. ;) Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 03:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You jet! Thanks, Aaroncrick^{(Tassie Boy talk)} 05:39, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Victorian Architecture

Hi Biatch! An article you have been concerned with has many issues and urgently needs improving. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Victorian architecture, address the different points if you can, and leave any comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 01:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Statue of john pascoe fawkner.jpg

File:Statue of john pascoe fawkner.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Statue of john pascoe fawkner.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Statue of john pascoe fawkner.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:54, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:John pascoe fawkner grave.jpg is now available as Commons:File:John pascoe fawkner grave.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:K2 apartments windsor.jpg is now available as Commons:File:K2 apartments windsor.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:07, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melbourne cemetery chapel.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Melbourne General Cemetery Chapel.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melbourne cemetery gatehouse.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Melbourne General Cemetery Gatehouse.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parliament house plans.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Parliament house plans.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:University of ballarat city campus.jpg is now available as Commons:File:University of ballarat city campus.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ian potter museum of art.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Ian potter museum of art.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shamrock Hotel

You'll need to gather consensus for any move or disambig. Gwen Gale (talk) 00:58, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting to the article talk page. I'm wholly neutral about any move to make way for a disambiguation page, my only worry being that there is as yet no consensus (your first try at doing this was undone, then you tried again shortly after, all without meaningful dicussion, no harm done, now you know).

It may take a few days at least, to get input from editors. Since there seems to be only one other notable hotel with that name (so far), a disambiguation link at the top of the article, rather than a whole disambig page, may be more helpful. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of South Melbourne Town Hall

Hello Biatch, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on September 29 2006, South Melbourne Town Hall, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Zoomzoom99 (page has mainspace links, and 19 edits). This has been done because the page is either pure vandalism or a blatant hoax (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Zoomzoom99. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Zoomzoom99 (talk · contribs) 11:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Block Place, Melbourne

The article Block Place, Melbourne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references finds a few published adddresses on block place in melbourne, but nothing indicating the street it's self is notable. Nothing in the article indicates notability of the street. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Albert Park, Victoria. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Oore (talk) 04:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you removed the gallery from that article. Oore (talk) 04:52, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you're interpreting relevant policies correctly? Oore (talk) 05:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely I am. Because I have been pulled up on it by numerous article reviewers before and educated on what makes good use of images in articles. Here is the relevant section of the policy:

"use of galleries may be appropriate in Wikipedia articles where a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images. The images in the gallery collectively must have encyclopedic value and add to the reader's understanding of the subject. Images in a gallery should be suitably captioned to explain their relevance both to the article subject and to the theme of the gallery, and the gallery should be appropriately titled (unless the theme of the gallery is clear from the context of the article)"

There is no way the article in question complies with this in its current format which is just a section called "Gallery" with a bunch of Flickr like shots. I have added a Commons Category link. You should correctly categorise these images if you want them to be available for this subject. --Biatch (talk) 05:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The commons link only has one image, so I think it's significantly less helpful as a visual aid for readers. Regardless, since you're sure of your edit, I yield to you. Oore (talk) 05:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned, lets work together to classify as many of the commons images to create a proper Albert Park gallery. Cheers--Biatch (talk) 05:39, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of McKillop Street, Melbourne

The article McKillop Street, Melbourne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Streets generally don't meet the requirements of WP:N, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lga map

Thanks for your help! —Felix the Cassowary 12:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. But for some reason I can't get it to work on Sebastopol, Victoria. --Biatch (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If they already show a map of the state, don't add long and lat, because they're already in there. If they're in there in the degrees-minutes-second format and you add them in the decimal format, you confuse the system. Well, that's my guess, and it's how I fixed them. —Felix the Cassowary 13:25, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

awesome thanks :) --Biatch (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Docklands Stadium

Template:Docklands Stadium has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jenks24 (talk) 22:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tram map

Have you seen the neat maps on Trams in Brisbane? - Shiftchange (talk) 01:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No Corey enright (talk) 07:31, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane Australian Football Club article

Hello Biatch - whilst researching a WP article History of association football in Brisbane, Queensland I bumped into the article you started on Brisbane FC, which I found useful to fill in some gaps (and have now expanded it - I trust you will approve) Thanks for the kickstart Regards Peter Eedy (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:140 william.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:140 william.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:19, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Early 2011 Victorian floods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascot, Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Environmental issues in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Household chemicals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Oldest football clubs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Melbourne Football Club (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of UNSW-Eastern Suburbs Bulldogs

The article UNSW-Eastern Suburbs Bulldogs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No live references; no significant coverage in google; no obvious notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of UNSW-Eastern Suburbs Bulldogs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UNSW-Eastern Suburbs Bulldogs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNSW-Eastern Suburbs Bulldogs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ararat, Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Taxi

Ballarat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Taxi

Moe, Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Taxi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup

Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 03:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Soldiers Hill, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page County of Grenville (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AFL Darling Downs

The article AFL Darling Downs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't seem notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 18:56, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horsham, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Mitchell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Glenelg River (Victoria), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barwon River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ballarat

Thanks for correcting that article. It looks good now. But it might have been nice if you had added an Edit summary, rather than allowing the system to use its standard one, implying that I was wrong. HiLo48 (talk) 23:27, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Barnstar awarded to Biatch, for his solid work on contributing articles to Wikipedia. Showing no sign of tiredness mate! - Adam37 Talk 08:08, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Corrie

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anthony Corrie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nasnema Chat 22:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Civic Hall Ballarat.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Civic Hall Ballarat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Biatch! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ballaarat (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Ballaarat (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ballarat in the 1850s.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ballarat in the 1850s.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:21, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Ballarat township 1857.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ballarat township 1857.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:22, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Flower Drum

The article Flower Drum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability and written like an advertisement

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajf773 (talk) 07:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donnie Lucero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donnie Lucero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Lucero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jenks24 (talk) 11:24, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flower Drum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flower Drum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flower Drum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 04:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Block Arcade, Melbourne

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Block Arcade, Melbourne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://theblock.com.au/history/#fb0=5. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 05:22, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Biatch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Australian rules football masters leagues

The article List of Australian rules football masters leagues has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Links in page will probably never be created due to lack of notability and ten years since listed here and none have been created, i.e. WP:REDNOT. No refs on page to show notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Flickerd (talk) 06:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Horsham (Victoria)

Hi Biatch, I've done a lot of work on the Horsham article and because you're the second most prolific editor for the article I thought you might what to check my work, correct, modify or expand on whatever. Knobbly ^talk 06:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Biatch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of North West Pacific Football League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North West Pacific Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North West Pacific Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BLAIXX 17:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South East Australian Football League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South East Australian Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South East Australian Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BLAIXX 18:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Australia Beautiful moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Keep Australia Beautiful, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 14:04, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Keep Australia Beautiful concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Keep Australia Beautiful, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Empireapartments.jpg

The file File:Empireapartments.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Keep Australia Beautiful

Hello, Biatch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keep Australia Beautiful".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Terrace houses in layfield street south melbourne.jpg

The file File:Terrace houses in layfield street south melbourne.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Australian rules football junior leagues for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Australian rules football junior leagues is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Australian rules football junior leagues until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bligh Place, Melbourne

The article Bligh Place, Melbourne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be an alley, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 20:51, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Causeway Lane, Melbourne

The article Causeway Lane, Melbourne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Basically an alley, does not pass WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Geelong exhibition building and market square clocktower.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Geelong exhibition building and market square clocktower.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:07, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Swan Hill Pioneer Settlement" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Swan Hill Pioneer Settlement and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Swan Hill Pioneer Settlement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Boonwurrung (disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Boonwurrung (disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 17#Boonwurrung (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Iseult^Δxparlez moi 07:05, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Yarra Bend, Victoria" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Yarra Bend, Victoria and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 27 § Yarra Bend, Victoria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 05:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shepparton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shepparton 1951.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shepparton 1951.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 18:42, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Central European Australian Football League Championships

The article Central European Australian Football League Championships has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not Notable, No Sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Former Bentleigh Hoyts Cinemas.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Former Bentleigh Hoyts Cinemas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 14:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Lane, Terry (2008-08-04). "Out of the past". The Age. Fairfax Media. pp. Green Guide supplement (p. 24). {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

[1] Lane, Terry (2008-08-04). "Out of the past". The Age. Fairfax Media. pp. Green Guide supplement (p. 24). {{cite news}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

[1]