A poster of Pather Panchali
|Directed by||Satyajit Ray|
|Screenplay by||Satyajit Ray|
|Based on||Pather Panchali
by Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay
|Music by||Ravi Shankar|
|Editing by||Dulal Dutta|
|Studio||Government of West Bengal|
|Distributed by||Aurora Film Corporation (1955)
Edward Harrison (1958)
Merchant Ivory Productions
Sony Pictures Classics (1995)
|Running time||112–126 minutes[a]|
Pather Panchali (Pôther Pãchali, [pɔt̪ʰer pãtʃali], English: Song of the Little Road) is a 1955 Bengali drama film directed by Satyajit Ray and produced by the Government of West Bengal. It is based on Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay's 1929 Bengali novel of the same name, and was the directorial debut of Ray. The first film in The Apu Trilogy, Pather Panchali depicts the childhood of the protagonist Apu in the countryside of Bengal in the 1920s.
Though the film had a limited budget,[b] featured mostly amateur actors, and was made by an inexperienced crew, Pather Panchali was a critical and popular success. Influenced by Italian neorealism, Ray developed his own style of lyrical realism in this film. The first film from independent India to attract major international critical attention, Pather Panchali won the "Best Human Document" award at the 1956 Cannes Film Festival, establishing Ray as a major international filmmaker. Today, Pather Panchali is considered to be one of the greatest films ever made.
Harihar Ray (Kanu Banerjee) earns a meager living as a pujari (priest) in the village of Nischindipur in rural Bengal, and dreams of a better career as an author of scholarly plays and poems. Harihar's wife, Sarbajaya (Karuna Banerjee) takes care of their two children, Durga (Uma Dasgupta) and Apu (Subir Banerjee), and her elderly aunt-in-law, Indir Thakrun (Chunibala Devi). Due to their limited resources, Sarbajaya resents having to share her home with the old and helpless cripple Indir. At times, Sarbajaya's taunts become overly offensive which forces Indir to take temporary refuge in the home of another relative. Durga feels filial affinity towards Indir and often shares fruits with her after stealing them from a wealthy neighbour’s orchard. One day, the neighbour's wife blames Durga for stealing a bead necklace; she blames Sarbajaya for encouraging Durga’s propensity to steal.
Durga, as the elder sister, cares for her brother Apu with motherly affection, although she does not spare any opportunity to tease him. They share the simple joys of life, such as sitting quietly under a tree, running after the candy man who passes through the village, viewing pictures in a bioscope shown by a travelling vendor, and watching a jatra by a troupe of actors. Every evening, they are delighted by the sound of a distant train's whistle. One day, they run away from home to catch a glimpse of the train. Upon returning home, they discover their Aunt Indir lying dead.
Harihar, unable to earn a good living in the village, decides to travel to cities to seek a better job. He promises Sarbajaya that he would return with money to repair their derelict house. During his absence, the family sinks deeper into poverty. Sarbajaya grows increasingly lonely and embittered. One day, during the monsoon season, Durga dances playfully in the downpour for a long time. She soon catches a cold, and develops high fever. With scarce medical care available, her fever continues and eventually on a night of incessant rain and gusty winds, she dies. Harihar returns home and starts to show Sarbajaya the merchandise he has brought from the city. Sarbajaya, who remains silent, breaks down at the feet of her husband, and Harihar screams as he discovers that he has lost his daughter. The family decides to leave the village and their ancestral home. As they start packing, Apu finds the necklace that Durga had earlier denied having stolen; he throws it into a pond. Apu and his parents leave the village on an ox-cart.
- Kanu Banerjee – Harihar Roy, Apu and Durga's father
- Karuna Banerjee – Sarbajaya Roy, Apu and Durga's mother
- Subir Banerjee – Apurba Roy (Apu)
- Runki Banerjee – Durga Roy (child)
- Uma Dasgupta – Durga Roy (teenage girl)
- Chunibala Devi – Indir, Indirtharkun Thakrun, the old aunt
- Tulsi Chakraborty – Prasanna, school teacher
The novel Pather Panchali by Bibhutibhushan Bandopadhyay is a classic bildungsroman in Bengali literature. It first appeared as a serial in a periodical in 1928, and was published as a book in 1929. The plot was based on the author's own early life. The novel depicts a poor family's struggle to survive in their ancestral rural home and the growing up of Apu, the male child in the family. The later part of the novel, where Apu and his parents leave the village and settle in Benaras, formed the basis of Aparajito (The Unvanquished, 1956), the second film of the Apu trilogy.
Satyajit Ray, working as a graphic designer for Signet Press, did illustrations for a new abridged edition of the book in 1944. At that time, he first read the unabridged novel, and was impressed by its warmth, humanity, detailing and lyrical quality. D.K. Gupta, the owner of the press, told Ray that the abridged edition of Pather Panchali would make a great film. Before 1946–47, Ray contemplated the possibility of making a film based on it. He chose the novel because of certain qualities that, according to him, "made it a great book: its humanism, its lyricism, and its ring of truth." The author's widow granted permission for Ray to make a film based on the novel; however, the agreement was in principle only, and no financial arrangement was made.
The title of the film in English is Song of the Little Road. Other translations of the Bengali title have been used, such as The Lament of the Path, Song of the Road, and Song of the Open Road. The Bengali word Path literally means path, and Pather means "of the path". Panchali refers to a type of narrative folk song that used to be performed in Bengal, and was the forerunner of another type of folk performance known as jatra.
In 1949, the French director Jean Renoir came to Kolkata to shoot his film The River (1951). Satyajit Ray helped him find locations in the countryside. It was then that Ray told Renoir about his idea of filming Pather Panchali, which had been on his mind for some time, and Renoir encouraged him to proceed. In 1950, Ray was sent to London by his employer, the advertising agency D.J. Keymer, to work at its headquarters. During his six months in London, he watched about hundred films. Among these, the neorealist film Bicycle Thieves (1948) would have a profound impact on him. Ray, in a 1982 lecture, said that he had come out of the theatre determined to become a filmmaker. The film made him believe that it was possible to make realistic cinema with an amateur cast and using location shooting. The realist narration style of Pather Panchali is indebted to Italian neorealism and the works of Renoir. The international success of Akira Kurosawa's Rashomon (1950) and Bimal Roy's 1953 film Do Bigha Zamin (which was shot partly on location and concerned a peasant family) inspired Ray to hope that Pather Panchali also might find an international audience. Besides the foreign influences, Ray is also indebted to Bengali literature and the native Indian theatrical tradition, particularly the rasa theory of classical Sanskrit drama. The complicated doctrine of rasa "centers predominantly on feeling experienced not only by the characters but also conveyed in a certain artistic way to the spectator".
The film did not have a complete script; it was made from Ray's drawings and notes. Ray completed the first draft of the notes during his sea voyage to and from London in 1950. Before the start of principal photography, he created a detailed storyboard of the film with attention to details and continuity.
Satyajit Ray wrote in the book Apur Panchali (the Bengali translation of Ray's 1994 book My Years with Apu: A Memoir) that many characters from the original novel were not included in the film. He rearranged some sequences of the novel to make the narrative better as a cinema. Some notable shifts from the novel in the script include the death scene of Indir Thakrun, which occurs quite early in the novel in a village shrine at the presence of some adults; in the film she dies in the open in the presence of Apu and Durga. The scene of Apu and Durga running to catch a glimpse of the train is not there in the novel, neither child manages to see the train there, although they made an attempt. Durga's fatal fever is shown to be due to a monsoon downpour in the film, while the novel did not narrate any specific cause of the fever. The ending of the film—the departure of the family from the village—is not the end of the novel. Ray tried to extract and build a simple theme out of the apparently random sequences of significant and trivial episodes of the novel, while preserving the loitering quality of it. Ray himself commented that, "The script had to retain some of the rambling quality of the novel because that in itself contained a clue to the feel of authenticity: life in a poor Bengali village does ramble."
Kanu Banerjee, an established Bengali film actor, portrayed the role of Harihar Ray, father of Apu and Durga. The role of Sarbajaya, wife of Harihar, was played by an amateur theatre actress of the Indian People's Theatre Association (IPTA), Karuna Banerjee, who was the wife of one friend of Ray. Uma Dasgupta, who was selected by an interview to act as Durga, also had prior experience in acting in theatre. For the role of Apu, Ray advertised in newspapers looking for boys of five to seven years age. Several boys turned up in response, but none of them met the expectation of the director. Finally, Ray's wife spotted a boy in their neighbourhood as a possible candidate. This boy, Subir Banerjee, was eventually cast as Apu (the surname of three main actors was Banerjee, although they were not related to each other). The toughest hurdle in the casting process was to identify an actress suitable to enact the character of the wizened, old Indir Thakrun. Ray eventually found Chunibala Devi, a retired stage actress living in a brothel, as the right candidate to portray Indir. Several minor roles were played by the villagers of Boral, the shooting location.
Shooting started on 27 October 1952. Boral, a village near Calcutta, was selected in early 1953 as the principal photography location. The technical team consisted of several first-timers. Ray had never directed anything and cinematographer Subrata Mitra had never operated a movie camera. Art director Bansi Chandragupta had professional experience, having worked with Jean Renoir on The River. In later years, both Mitra and Chandragupta went on to establish themselves as respected professionals in their craft. Mitra had met Ray on the set of The River, where Mitra was allowed to observe the production, take still photographs, and keep copious lighting notes for personal reference. Having become friends, Mitra frequently kept Ray informed about the production and showed his stills. Ray was impressed enough by the photos to promise him an assistant's position on Pather Panchali, but when the production neared, Ray offered to let him shoot the film. As Mitra had no prior filmmaking experience and was only 21 at the time, the choice was met with considerable scepticism by those aware of the production. Mitra himself later speculated that Ray was perhaps nervous about working with an established crew.
From the outset, funding was a problem as no producer was willing to produce the film. Several producers rejected the proposal; one producer, after learning Ray's plan, contacted the widow of the novel's author to get its royalty and get the film directed by a well-established director Debaki Bose. The widow turned down that offer. The estimated budget of the film was 70,000 rupees, but prospective producers were reluctant as the film lacked stars, songs or action scenes.
Ray had to borrow money to shoot enough footage so as to persuade prospective producers to finance the whole film. To raise funds during the production period, Ray kept working as a graphic designer, pawned his life insurance policy and sold his collection of LP records. Production manager Anil Chowdhury convinced Ray's wife, Bijoya, to pawn her jewels as well. Nonetheless, Ray still ran out of the required money partway through filming and shooting had to be suspended for nearly a year, and following that, the shooting could be done only in intermittent pieces. Ray acknowledged later that the delays made him tense, and that three miracles saved the film: "One, Apu's voice did not break. Two, Durga did not grow up. Three, Indir Thakrun did not die."
Bidhan Chandra Roy, then the Chief Minister of West Bengal, was requested by an influential friend of Ray's mother to help the production. The Chief Minister obliged, and government officials saw the footage. Home Publicity Department of the government of West Bengal examined the cost of backing the film, and sanctioned a loan, allowing Ray to finish the film.[c] However, the government misunderstood the nature of the movie, and considered it as a documentary for rural uplift, such as the need for road improvement. Indeed, the money was loaned on record for 'roads improvement', a reference to the film's title. Monroe Wheeler, the head of the department of exhibitions and publications of New York's Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), was in Calcutta in 1954 when he heard about the shooting of the film and met Ray. He considered the incomplete footage of very high quality, and inspired Ray to finish the film so that it could be shown during an exhibition in MoMA the following year. About six months after Wheeler's visit, American director John Huston visited India for an early location scout for The Man Who Would Be King (which was finally made in 1975). Wheeler had asked Huston to check the progress of Ray's project. Huston saw excerpts of the unfinished film and recognised "the footage as the work of a great film-maker." Thanks to Huston's positive feedback, MoMA helped Ray with some additional money. It took three years to complete the shooting, and go to the post-production.
The soundtrack of the film was scored by the sitar player Ravi Shankar, who was at the early stage of his career, having debuted in 1939. The background scores feature pieces based on several ragas of Indian classical music, played mostly in sitar. The soundtrack, described as at once plaintive and exhilarating, is featured in the list of 50 greatest film soundtracks published by The Guardian in 2007. It has also been cited as a major influence on The Beatles, specifically George Harrison.
Ravi Shankar saw about half the film in a roughly edited version before composing the background score; however, he was already familiar with the story from having read the novel. When Ray met him, Shankar hummed a tune which had both a classical touch as well as a folk hue; the tune, usually played on a bamboo flute, became the main theme of the film. The majority of the score was composed in a night-long session lasting about eleven hours. Shankar also composed two solo sitar pieces—one based on the raga Desh (traditionally associated with rain), and one sombre piece based on the raga Todi (usually associated with morning or evening). The film's cinematographer, Subrata Mitra, also performed the sitar for parts of the soundtrack.
Ray and his team worked day and night during post-production, and just managed to get the film ready to send it to MoMA to be shown in conjunction with the exhibition Textiles and Ornamental Arts of India in May 1955, The film, billed as "The Story of Apu and Durga", lacked subtitles. It was a part of a series of six evening performances at MoMA including the US debut of sarod maestro Ali Akbar Khan and the classical dancer Shanta Rao. Pather Panchali's MoMA opening was well received. The film had its domestic premiere at the annual meeting of the Advertising Club of Calcutta. The response was not positive, and Ray felt "extremely discouraged". Before its general release in Calcutta, Ray himself designed some large advertisements, including a neon sign showing Apu and Durga running, which was strategically placed in a busy location of the city. Pather Panchali was released in a Calcutta cinema on 26 August 1955 and had a poor initial response. However, thanks to word of mouth, the screenings started filling up within a week or two. It opened again at another cinema hall, where it ran for seven weeks. A delay in subtitling caused the postponing of the film's release in UK until December 1957. It went on to great success in the US in 1958, running for eight months at the Fifth Avenue Playhouse in New York.
In India, the reaction to the film was enthusiastic. The Times of India wrote that "It is absurd to compare it with any other Indian cinema [...] Pather Panchali is pure cinema". Bidhan Chandra Roy, the Chief Minister of West Bengal, arranged a special screening of the film for Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru in a Calcutta theatre. Nehru was impressed by the film. Thus, despite opposition from some quarters within the Governments of West Bengal and India because of its depiction of poverty, Pather Panchali was sent to the 1956 Cannes Film Festival with the personal approval of the Prime Minister. The film was screened towards the end of the festival, coinciding with a party thrown by the Japanese delegation. Thus, only a small number of critics attended the show. Although some were initially unenthusiastic at the prospect of yet another Indian melodrama, they found "the magic horse of poetry" slowly invading the screen. Subsequently, the film was awarded the Best Human Document prize at this festival.
Pather Panchali was the first film made in independent India that received major critical attention internationally, and placed India on the world cinema map. In the United Kingdom, Lindsay Anderson noted it as "a beautiful picture, completely fresh and personal. [Ray's camera] reaches forward into life, exploring and exposing, with reverence and wonder." Hazel-Dawn Dumpert of LA Weekly wrote that the film was "as deeply beautiful and plainly poetic as any movie ever made. Rare and exquisite." Pauline Kael commented: "The first film by the masterly Satyajit Ray—possibly the most unembarrassed and natural of directors—is a quiet reverie about the life of an impoverished Brahmin family in a Bengali village. Beautiful, sometimes funny, and full of love, it brought a new vision of India to the screen." Basil Wright commented: "I have never forgotten the private projection room at the British Film Institute during which I experienced the shock of recognition and excitement when, unexpectedly, one is suddenly exposed to a new and incontrovertible work of art." Time wrote that "Pather Panchali is perhaps the finest piece of filmed folklore since Robert Flaherty's Nanook of the North." Newsweek critic, Jack Kroll, reviewed the film as "one of the most stunning first films in movie history", while Philip French of The Observer has described Pather Panchali as "one of the greatest pictures ever made". James Berardinelli writes, "This tale, as crafted by Ray, touches the souls and minds of viewers, transcending cultural and linguistic barriers".
However, the reaction was not uniformly positive. After watching the movie, François Truffaut is reported to have said, "I don’t want to see a movie of peasants eating with their hands." Bosley Crowther, then the most influential critic of The New York Times, wrote in a 1958 review of the film, "Any picture as loose in structure or as listless in tempo as this one is would barely pass as a "rough cut" with the editors in Hollywood", even though he praised the deftly crafted, yet slow, emergence of a poetic theme of lament. The Harvard Crimson wrote, "Many of the fragmented episodes are effective, but many others have little to add to the general effect. The disconnection itself has its purpose, and gives an all-inclusive quality to the film; yet it is also distracting and contributes to the film's great weakness: its general diffuseness, its inability to command sustained attention. For Pather Panchali, remarkable as it may be, is something of a chore to sit through." Early in 1980, Ray was openly criticised by an Indian Member of Parliament and former actress Nargis Dutt, who accused Ray of "exporting poverty". While many critics celebrated Pather Panchali as a eulogy of third world culture, others criticised it for what they took to be romanticisation of such a culture.
Twenty years after the release of Pather Panchali, Akira Kurosawa summarised the effect of the film as follows: "I can never forget the excitement in my mind after seeing it. I have had several more opportunities to see the film since then and each time I feel more overwhelmed. It is the kind of cinema that flows with the serenity and nobility of a big river... People are born, live out their lives, and then accept their deaths. Without the least effort and without any sudden jerks, Ray paints his picture, but its effect on the audience is to stir up deep passions. How does he achieve this? There is nothing irrelevant or haphazard in his cinematographic technique. In that lies the secret of its excellence."
As of 2008, Pather Panchali is available in DVD in both Region 2 PAL and Region 1 NTSC formats. Artificial Eye Entertainment is the distributor of Region 2 while Columbia Tri-Star is the distributor of Region 1 format.
Bosley Crowther, in a 1958 review, writes that Pather Panchali delicately indicates the theme of love being not nullified by poverty, and that despite poverty, people can enjoy the little pleasures in their world. Marie Seton, in 2003 edition of her book Portrait of a Director: Satyajit Ray, describes that in the film, the delights and pleasures of youth intersperse with depiction of impoverishment. Seton describes the bonding between Durga and Indir, and their fate as signifying a philosophical core: that both young and old die. Scholars have described parts or whole of the film as having lyrical quality. Seton identifies the imagery immediately prior to the onset of monsoon as the most lyrical in the film. Darius Cooper, in the book The Cinema of Satyajit Ray: Between Tradition and Modernity (2000) has discussed the use of different rasa in the film. Cooper has noted the repeated use of "epiphany of wonder" in Apu. Apu is wondered not only by what he sees around, he uses his imagination to create another world. Cooper has analysed that the immersive experience of the film corresponds to this epiphany of wonder. Stephen Teo, in his 2013 edition of The Asian Cinema Experience: Styles, Spaces, Theory, utilises the scene in which Apu and Durga discovers train tracks as an example of gradual build-up of the epiphany and the resulting immersive experience.
Sharmishtha Gooptu, in her 2010 book Bengali Cinema: 'An Other Nation' , has discussed that the idyllic village life in Pather Panchali represents an authentic Bengali village, which was lost due to the upheavals of the partition of Bengal in 1947; the film seeks to connect an idealised past (pre-partition) with actual present (post-partition, when the film was made). She says that the film uses prototypes of rural Bengal to build up the ideal village.
Mitali Pati and Suranjan Ganguly, in their 1996 essay "Perspectives on Bengali film and literature", have discussed the use of eye-level shots, natural lighting, long takes, and other techniques by Ray to ensure his commitment to realism. Mainak Biswas, in his essay in the book Italian Neorealism and Global Cinema (2007), commented that Pather Panchali comes very near to the concept of neorealism, as there are many passages in the film during which there is no dramatic development, even though the usual realities of life, such as the changing of seasons, passing of a day, are concretely filmed.
Pather Panchali was followed by two films that continued the tale of Apu's life—Aparajito (The Unvanquished) in 1956 and Apur Sansar (The World of Apu) in 1959. The three films are together known as the Apu Trilogy. Aparajito portrays the adolescent Apu, his education in the rural school and in a Calcutta college. The central theme in Aparajito is the poignant relation between a doting mother and her young ambitious boy. Apur Sansar tells the story of the brief family life of Apu, his reaction at the premature death of his wife, and finally bonding with his son whom he left as an infant. Both the two sequels won multiple national and international awards. Ray did not have any specific plan to make a trilogy from the start. Indeed, he planned to make the third instalment only after being asked about the possibility of a trilogy at the 1957 Venice Film Festival, where Aparajito won the Golden Lion award.
Pather Panchali ushered in a new tradition of film-making in India, one in which authenticity and social realism were key themes (see Parallel Cinema), breaking the rule of the Indian film establishment of the time. Although described as a turning point in Indian cinema, some commentators opined that Pather Panchali did not usher in a modern age in Indian cinema. Rather, the film refined an already existent "realist textual principle" in Indian cinema. In 1963, Time noted that thanks to Pather Panchali, Satyajit Ray was one of the "hardy little band of inspired pioneers" of a new cinematic movement that was enjoying a good number of imitators worldwide. The film has since been considered as a "global landmark" and "among the essential moviegoing experiences".
Sight & Sound, the British Film Institute's film magazine, included the film several times in its Critics' Poll list of all-time greatest films, in 1962 (ranked at #11), 1992 (ranked at #6) and 2002 (ranked at #22). In 1998, in the Asian film magazine Cinemaya's critics' poll of all-time greatest films, Pather Panchali was ranked at No. 2 on the list. The Village Voice ranked the film at No. 12 (tied with The Godfather) in its Top 250 "Best Films of the Century" list in 1999, based on a poll of critics.
Pather Panchali was included in various other all-time greatest film lists, including Time Out magazine's "Centenary Top One Hundred Films" in 1995, the San Francisco Chronicle "Hot 100 Films From the Past" in 1997, the Rolling Stone "100 Maverick Movies of the Last 100 Years" in 1999, "The New York Times Guide to the Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made" in 2002, and the British Film Institute's Top Fifty "Must See" Children's Films in 2005, as well as BFI's "Top 10 Indian Films" of all time. The Apu Trilogy as a whole was included in film critic Roger Ebert's list of "100 Great Movies" in 2001 and in Time magazine's All-Time 100 best movies list in 2005.
Following Pather Panchali, Satyajit Ray went on to make a total of thirty-seven films, including feature films, documentaries and shorts. His works included scripting, casting, scoring, cinematography, art direction, editing and designing his own credit titles and publicity material. He developed a distinctive style of film-making, with visual lyricism and strong humanism forming the basis of his works, as in his debut film Pather Panchali. Consequently Ray established himself as an auteur of cinema.
||3rd National Film Awards||India|
|1956||9th Cannes Film Festival||France|
|1956||Vatican Award, Rome||–||Italy|
|1956||Golden Carbao, Manila||–||Philippines|
|1956||Diploma of Merit||Edinburgh International Film Festival||Scotland|
|1957||Selznick Golden Laurel for Best Film||Berlin International Film Festival||Germany|
||San Francisco International Film Festival||United States|
|1958||Best Film||Vancouver International Film Festival||Canada|
|1958||Critics' Award for Best Film||Stratford Film Festival||Canada|
|1958||Best Foreign Language Film, National Board of Review Awards||–||United States|
|1959||Best Foreign Film||New York Film Festival||United States|
|1966||Kinema Jumpo Award for Best Foreign Film||–||Japan|
|1969||Bodil Award for Best Non-European Film||–||Denmark|
- The running time of the film is mentioned variably in different sources. A Museum of Modern Art anthology gives the running time of 112 minutes.(Bee, Hellczer & McFadden 2013, p. 204) An LA Weekly notice provides running time 115 minutes. Stuart Jeffries of The Guardian gives a running time of 125 minutes in a 2010 piece, while Rovi Hal Erickson of the New York Times mentions 126 minutes in a review summary in NYT Critics' Pick. In the 2005 book Doug Pratt's DVD: Movies, Television, Music, Art, Adult, and More!, the author tells that the running time is 125 minutes but mentions that most references list the running time at about 10 minutes less than that.(Pratt 2005, p. 908)
- Satyajit Ray wrote in My Years with Apu: A Memoir (1994) that the budget was Rs 70,000,(Ray 1996, p. 36) and the loan from the government of West Bengal was Rs 70,000.(Ray 1996, p. 60) During an interview in 1970, in reply of the question "How much did the production of Pather Panchali cost in all, if you count in the value of the rupee today?", Ray replied, "In those days it cost a little over Rs. 150,000, whereas an average film now costs twice that much."(Isaksson 2007, p. 40)
- Ray writes that the amount of loan was Rs 70,000.(Ray 2005, p. 77)
- Cousins 2004, pp. 237–238.
- Gokulsing & Dissanayake 2013, p. 277.
- Gugelberger 1996, p. 173.
- Robinson 2003, p. 74.
- Sekhar, Saumitra. "Pather Panchali". Banglapedia. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
- Robinson 2003, p. 75.
- Ray 2010, p. 22.
- Robinson 1989, p. 58.
- Ray 2010, pp. 22–23.
- Ray 2010, p. 23.
- Isaksson 2007, p. 39.
- Ray 2005, p. 33.
- Robinson 1989, p. 77.
- Harrison, Edward (20 October 1958). "Cinema: New Picture". Time. Retrieved 18 May 2008.(subscription required)
- Hal Erickson, Rovi. "Pather Panchali (1955)". New York Ties. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- Crowther, Bosley (23 September 1958). "Screen: Exotic Import; Pather Panchali' From India Opens Here". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Herman, Jan; Thomas, Kevin (28 May 1998). "The Orange Screen; A Peek at the Best; Pather Panchali and October represent pinnacles of film achievement". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 26 May 2008.
- Mohanta, Sambaru Chandra. "Panchali". Banglapedia. The Asiatic Society of Bangladesh. Retrieved 6 September 2013.
- Robinson 1989, p. 67.
- Robinson 2005, pp. 42–44
- Robinson 1989, p. 71.
- ""The Bicycle Thieves" Effect". Biography. www.satyajitray.org. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Ruberto & Wilson 2007, p. 16.
- Corrigan & White 2012, p. 252.
- Robinson 1989, p. 82.
- Cooper 2000, pp. 1–4.
- Ray 2010, p. 44.
- Ray 2010, p. 42.
- Ray 2010, pp. 45–46.
- Ray 2010, p. 45.
- Robinson 1989, p. 75.
- Robinson 1989, p. 79.
- Robinson 1989, p. 78.
- Robinson 1989, p. 80.
- Ettedgui 1999, pp. 48–59.
- Gulzar, Nihalni & Chatterjee 2003, p. 539.
- Ettedgui 1999, p. 50.
- Ray 2010, p. 48.
- Ray 2010, p. 51.
- Robinson 1989, p. 83.
- Robinson 1989, p. 84.
- Ray 2010, p. 77.
- "Filmi Funda Pather Panchali (1955)". The Telegraph. 20 April 2005. Retrieved 29 April 2006.
- McGill, Douglas c. (16 August 1988). "Monroe Wheeler, Board Member of Modern Museum, Is Dead at 89". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 June 2008.
- Robinson 1989, p. 87.
- "Making of Pather Panchali". SatyajitRay.org. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- Amitav Ghosh in his essay Satyajit Ray in Khair 2005, pp. 3–4
- Mehta 1998, p. 222
- Lavezzoli 2006, p. 53
- Hoberman, J (11 April 1995). "The Hunger Artist". The Village Voice. p. 51.
- "The 50 greatest film soundtracks". The Observer (Guardian News and Media Limited). 18 March 2007. Retrieved 12 May 2008.
- Leng, Simon (2006). While My Guitar Gently Weeps: The Music of George Harrison. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Hal Leonard. pp. 48–9. ISBN 1423406095. Retrieved 7 July 2012.
- Robinson 2003, p. 88
- Nijenhuis 1976, pp. 77–78
- Ettedgui 1999, pp. 49
- Silver, Charles (13 November 2012). "Satyajit Ray's Pather Panchali". Inside Out. Museum of Modern Art. Retrieved 4 December 2013.
- Robinson 2003, p. 89
- Robinson 2003, p. 90
- Robinson 2003, p. 105
- Seton 2003, p. 87
- Basu, Dilip. "Films of Satyajit Ray: Getting Started". Satyajit Ray Film and Study Collection. University of California – Santa Cruz. Retrieved 26 June 2008.
- Robinson 2003, p. 104
- Seton 2003, p. 9
- Grimes, Paul (26 June 1960). "Indian Moviemaker Who Flees Escape". The New York Times. Retrieved 26 May 2008.
- Folkart, Burta A. (24 April 1992). "Satyajit Ray; Film Director Depicted India's Tragedy". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 26 May 2008.
- Kadapa-Bose, Surekha (22 May 2005). "Ray of hope: Pather Panchali". Dawn. Archived from the original on 19 May 2008. Retrieved 26 May 2008.
- Bhaskaran, Gautaman (11 April 2004). "Star or Actor?". The Hindu. Retrieved 26 May 2008.
- "Pather Panchali (Song of the Little Road)". SatyajitRay.org. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- "Pather Panchali (Song of the Little Road)". satyajitray.org. Retrieved 19 May 2008.
- Chapman 2003, p. 323
- French, Philip (5 May 2002). "Pather Panchali". The Observer. Retrieved 27 July 2006.
- Berardinelli, James (1996). "Review: Pather Panchali". ReelViews. Retrieved 31 July 2008.
- McFadden, Robert D. (8 March 1981). "Bosley Crowther, 27 Years a Critic of Films for Times, is Dead at 75". The new York Times. Retrieved 11 June 2008.
- Quint, Peter E. (2 November 1959). "Pather Panchali". The Harvard Crimson (The Harvard Crimson, Inc). Archived from the original on 2005-05-08. Retrieved 25 May 2008.
- Robinson 2003, pp. 327–328
- Cooper 2000, p. 2
- Robinson 2003, p. 91
- Pather Panchali at Rotten Tomatoes
- "Best of Rotten Tomatoes: Foreign". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "Pather Panchali". dvdcompare. www.dvdbeaver.com. Retrieved 12 October 2008.
- Seton 2003, p. 81.
- Seton 2003, p. 82.
- Seton 2003, p. 84.
- Cooper 2000, pp. 24–40.
- Cooper 2000, pp. 24–26.
- Cooper 2000, p. 25.
- Teo 2013, p. 49.
- Gooptu 2010, p. 148.
- Gooptu 2010, p. 149.
- Pati & Ganguly 1996, p. 417.
- Biswas 2007, pp. 87–88.
- "Awards for Films". About Ray. www.satyajitray.org. Retrieved 19 May 2008.
- Wood 1972, p. 61
- Likhi, Abhilaksh (15 August 1999). "Sense & Cinema". The Tribune (The Tribune Trust). Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Das Gupta, Chidananda (Autumn 1980). "New Directions in Indian Cinema". Film Quarterly (University of California Press) 34 (1): 32–42. doi:10.1525/fq.1980.34.1.04a00070. ISSN 0015-1386. OCLC 1569205.
- Bhaskaran, Gautaman (5 September 2004). "Ray's eternal song". The Hindu. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- "A Religion of Film". Time (Time Inc). 20 September 1963. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Clark, Mike (30 October 2003). "New on DVD". USA Today (Gannett Co. Inc). Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- Aaron and Mark Caldwell (2004). "Sight and Sound Poll 1962: Critics". Top 100 Movie Lists. Archived from the original on 29 July 2009. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "The Sight & Sound Top Ten Poll: 1992". Sight & Sound. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 2012-03-09. Retrieved 20 May 2008.
- "Sight & Sound Top Ten Poll 2002: The rest of the critics' list". Sight & Sound. British Film Institute. Archived from the original on 2012-05-15. Retrieved 24 April 2009.
- Redwine, Ivana. ""Apu Trilogy" DVD Review". About.com. Retrieved 14 March 2009.
- Totaro, Donato (31 January 2003). "The "Sight & Sound" of Canons". Offscreen Journal (Canada Council for the Arts). Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "Take One: The First Annual Village Voice Film Critics' Poll". The Village Voice. 1999. Archived from the original on 26 August 2007. Retrieved 27 July 2006.
- "Top 100 Films (Centenary) from Time Out Film Guide". Filmsite.org. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "Hot 100 Films From the Past by San Francisco Chronicle Film Critics". Filmsite.org. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "100 Maverick Movies of the Last 100 Years by Rolling Stone Magazine". Filmsite.org. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "The Best 1,000 Movies Ever Made". The New York Times. 2002.
- "The Top Fifty "Must See" Children's Films by the British Film Institute (BFI)". Filmsite.org. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "Top 10 Indian Films". British Film Institute. 2002. Archived from the original on 2012-05-25. Retrieved 15 March 2011.
- Ebert, Roger (4 March 2001). "The Apu Trilogy (1959)". rogerebert.com. Retrieved 19 April 2009.
- "All-time 100 Movies". Time (Time Inc). 12 February 2005. Retrieved 19 May 2008.
- Santas 2002, p. 18
- Gokulsing & Dissanayake 2004, p. 32
- Goristas, Helen. "Satyajit Ray". Senses of Cinema. Archived from the original on 11 May 2008. Retrieved 19 May 2008.
- "Awards for Satyajit Ray". Ray Film and Study Collection. University of California — Santa Cruz. Retrieved 18 May 2008.
- "Festival de Cannes: Pather Panchali". festival-cannes.com. Retrieved 5 February 2009.
- "Indian Film Honored; Pather Panchali Wins Prize at Stratford, Ont., Fete". New York Times. 14 July 1958. p. 16. Retrieved 24 May 2008.
- "1958 Award Winners". National Board of Review of Motion Pictures. Retrieved 24 November 2013.
- "Awards 1969, Bodil Awards". Retrieved 30 October 2010.
- "Pather Panchali". LA Weekly. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- Jeffries, Stuart (19 October 2010). "Pather Panchali: No 12 best arthouse film of all time". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 December 2013.
- Bee, Harriet Schoenhotz; Hellczer, Cassandra; McFadden, Sarah, eds. (2013). MoMA Highlights: 350 Works from The Museum of Modern Art, New York. The Museum of Modern Art. ISBN 978-0-87070-846-6.
- Biswas, Moinak (2007). "In the mirror of an alternative globalism: the neorealist encounter in India". In Ruberto, Laura E.; Wilson, Kristi M. Italian Neorealism and Global Cinema. Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-3324-2.
- Chapman, James (2003), Cinemas of the World: Film and Society from 1895 to the Present, Reaktion Books, ISBN 1-86189-162-8.
- Corrigan, Timothy; White, Patricia (2012). The Film Experience: An Introduction. Bedford/St. Martin's. ISBN 978-0-312-68170-8.
- Cousins, Mark (2004), The Story of Film: A Worldwide History of Film from the Host of the BBC's Scene by Scene, Thunder's Mouth Press, ISBN 1-56025-612-5.
- Cooper, Darius (2000), The Cinema of Satyajit Ray: Between Tradition and Modernity, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-62980-2.
- Ettedgui, Peter (1999), Cinematography: Screencraft, Focal Press, ISBN 0-240-80382-5.
- Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2004), Indian Popular Cinema: A Narrative of Cultural Change, Trentham Books, ISBN 1-85856-329-1.
- Gokulsing, K. Moti; Dissanayake, Wimal (2013). Routledge Handbook of Indian Cinemas. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-77284-9.
- Gooptu, Sharmistha (2010). Bengali Cinema: 'An Other Nation'. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-84334-5.
- Gugelberger, Georg M. (1996). The Real Thing: Testimonial Discourse and Latin America. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-1844-6.
- Gulzar; Nihalni, Govind; Chatterjee, Saibal (2003), "Biographies", Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema, Popular Prakashan, ISBN 81-7991-066-0.
- Isaksson, Folke (2007). "Conversation with Satyajit Ray". In Cardullo, Bert. Satyajit Ray: Interviews. Univ. Press of Mississippi. ISBN 978-1-57806-937-8.
- Khair, Tabish (2005), Amitav Ghosh : A Critical Companion, Orient Longman, ISBN 81-7824-113-7.
- Lavezzoli, Peter (2006), The Dawn of Indian Music in the West, Continuum International Publishing Group, ISBN 0-8264-1815-5.
- Nijenhuis, Emmie te (1976), The Rāgas of Somanātha, Brill Archive, ISBN 90-04-04873-1.
- Pati, Mitali; Ganguly, Suranjan (1996). "Perspectives on Bengali film and literature". In Natarajan, Nalini; Nelson, Emmanuel Sampath. Handbook of Twentieth-century Literatures of India. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-28778-7.
- Pratt, Douglas (2005). Doug Pratt's DVD: Movies, Television, Music, Art, Adult, and More!. UNET 2 Corporation. ISBN 978-1-932916-01-0.
- Ray, Satyajit (2010). Apur Panchali (in Bengali). Ananda Publishers. ISBN 8172153678.
- Ray, Satyajit (1996). My Years with Apu. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-024780-0.
- Ray, Satyajit (2005), Our Films, Their Films, Orient Longman, ISBN 81-250-1565-5.
- Robinson, A (2005), Satyajit Ray: A Vision of Cinema, I. B. Tauris, ISBN 1-84511-074-9.
- Robinson, Andrew (1989). Satyajit Ray: The Inner Eye. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06946-6.
- Robinson, A (2003), Satyajit Ray: The Inner Eye: The Biography of a Master Film-Maker, I. B. Tauris, ISBN 1-86064-965-3.
- Ruberto, Laura E.; Wilson, Kristi M. (2007), Italian Neorealism and Global Cinema, Wayne State University Press, ISBN 0-8143-3324-9.
- Santas, Constantine (2002), Responding to film: A Text Guide for Students of Cinema Art, Rowman & Littlefield, ISBN 0-8304-1580-7.
- Seton, Marie (2003), Portrait of a Director: Satyajit Ray, Penguin Books India, ISBN 978-0-14-302972-4
- Mehta, Ved (1998), "City of Dreadful Night", A Ved Mehta Reader: The Craft of the Essay, Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-07561-8.
- Teo, Stephen (2013). The Asian Cinema Experience: Styles, Spaces, Theory. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-57146-3.
- Wood, R (1972), The Apu trilogy, November Books Ltd, ISBN 0-85631-003-4.
- Pather Panchali at the Internet Movie Database
- Pather Panchali at allmovie
- Pather Panchali at Rotten Tomatoes
- Pather Panchali at Ray Film and Study Collection University of California – Santa Cruz