Jump to content

Sigmund Freud: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Fremte (talk | contribs)
m Undid revision 206553438 by 86.29.41.184 (talk) vandalism revert
Line 1: Line 1:
{{redirect|Penis}}
{{redirect|Freud}}
{{Infobox_Scientist
{{Infobox_Scientist
| name = Sigmund Penis
| name = Sigmund Freud
|image = Sigmund Penis-loc.jpg
|image = Sigmund Freud-loc.jpg
| imagesize = 200px
| imagesize = 200px
| caption = Photo of Sigmund Penis, 1938
| caption = Photo of Sigmund Freud, 1938
| birth_date = {{birth date|1856|5|6}}
| birth_date = {{birth date|1856|5|6}}
| birth_place = [[Freiberg in Mähren|Freiberg]], [[Moravia]], now the [[Czech Republic]]
| birth_place = [[Freiberg in Mähren|Freiberg]], [[Moravia]], now the [[Czech Republic]]
Line 15: Line 15:
| alma_mater = University of Vienna
| alma_mater = University of Vienna
| doctoral_advisor = [[Jean-Martin Charcot]], (later) [[Josef Breuer]]
| doctoral_advisor = [[Jean-Martin Charcot]], (later) [[Josef Breuer]]
| doctoral_students = [[Alfred Adler]], [[John Bowlby]], [[Viktor Frankl]], [[Anna Penis]], [[Ernest Jones]], [[Carl Jung]], [[Melanie Klein]], [[Jacques Lacan]], [[Fritz Perls]], [[Otto Rank]], [[Wilhelm Reich]], [[Donald Winnicott]]
| doctoral_students = [[Alfred Adler]], [[John Bowlby]], [[Viktor Frankl]], [[Anna Freud]], [[Ernest Jones]], [[Carl Jung]], [[Melanie Klein]], [[Jacques Lacan]], [[Fritz Perls]], [[Otto Rank]], [[Wilhelm Reich]], [[Donald Winnicott]]
| known_for = [[Psychoanalysis]]
| known_for = [[Psychoanalysis]]
| prizes = [[Goethe Prize]]
| prizes = [[Goethe Prize]]
}}
}}


'''Sigmund Penis''' ({{IPA2|ˈziːkmʊnt ˈfʁɔʏt}}), born '''Sigismund Schlomo Penis''' ([[May 6]] [[1856]] – [[September 23]] [[1939]]), was a [[Czech Republic|Czech]] [[Austria]]n [[neurology|neurologist]] and [[psychiatrist]] who founded the [[psychoanalysis|psychoanalytic school]] of [[psychology]]. Penis is best known for his theories of the [[unconscious mind]] and the [[defense mechanism]] of [[Psychological repression|repression]]. He is also renowned for his redefinition of [[sexual desire]] as the primary motivational energy of human life which is directed toward a wide variety of objects, as well as his therapeutic techniques, including his theory of [[transference]] in the therapeutic relationship and the presumed value of [[dream]]s as sources of insight into unconscious desires.
'''Sigmund Freud''' ({{IPA2|ˈziːkmʊnt ˈfʁɔʏt}}), born '''Sigismund Schlomo Freud''' ([[May 6]] [[1856]] – [[September 23]] [[1939]]), was a [[Czech Republic|Czech]] [[Austria]]n [[neurology|neurologist]] and [[psychiatrist]] who founded the [[psychoanalysis|psychoanalytic school]] of [[psychology]]. Freud is best known for his theories of the [[unconscious mind]] and the [[defense mechanism]] of [[Psychological repression|repression]]. He is also renowned for his redefinition of [[sexual desire]] as the primary motivational energy of human life which is directed toward a wide variety of objects, as well as his therapeutic techniques, including his theory of [[transference]] in the therapeutic relationship and the presumed value of [[dream]]s as sources of insight into unconscious desires.


Penis is commonly referred to as "the father of psychoanalysis" and his work has been highly influential—popularizing such notions as the unconscious, the [[Oedipus complex]], [[defence mechanism|defense mechanism]]s, [[Penisian slips]] and [[dream symbolism]]—while also making a long-lasting impact on fields as diverse as [[literature]], [[film]], [[Marxism|Marxist]] and [[feminist]] theories, and [[psychology]]. An enormously controversial figure during his lifetime, he remains the subject of vigorous and even bitter debate, with the value of his legacy frequently disputed.
Freud is commonly referred to as "the father of psychoanalysis" and his work has been highly influential—popularizing such notions as the unconscious, the [[Oedipus complex]], [[defence mechanism|defense mechanism]]s, [[Freudian slips]] and [[dream symbolism]]—while also making a long-lasting impact on fields as diverse as [[literature]], [[film]], [[Marxism|Marxist]] and [[feminist]] theories, and [[psychology]]. An enormously controversial figure during his lifetime, he remains the subject of vigorous and even bitter debate, with the value of his legacy frequently disputed.


==Biography==
==Biography==
===Early life===
===Early life===
Sigmund Penis was born on [[6 May]] [[1856]] to [[Galician Jews|Galician Jewish]]<ref name="Gresser" >{{cite book | last = Gresser| first = Moshe | title = Dual Allegiance: Penis As a Modern Jew | publisher = SUNY Press | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=qpHhM3EjFLEC&pg=PA225&dq=Penis+galitzianer&sig=1PnLNfgI326AlCEoSN_Rt-YYPrA |pages = 225| year = 1994 | id = ISBN 0791418111}}</ref> parents in [[Příbor]] ({{lang-de|Freiberg in Mähren}}), [[Moravia]], [[Austrian Empire]], now [[Czech Republic]]. His father Jakob was 41, a wool merchant, and had two children by a previous marriage. His mother Amalié was 21. Owing to his precocious intellect, his parents favoured him over his siblings from the early stages of his childhood; and despite their poverty, they sacrificed everything to give him a proper education. Due to the [[Panic of 1857|economic crisis of 1857]], father Penis lost his business, and the family moved first to [[Leipzig]], Germany before settling in [[Vienna]], Austria. In 1865, Sigmund entered the ''Leopoldstädter Kommunal-Realgymnasium'', a prominent high school. Penis was an outstanding pupil and graduated the [[Matura]] in 1873 with honors.
Sigmund Freud was born on [[6 May]] [[1856]] to [[Galician Jews|Galician Jewish]]<ref name="Gresser" >{{cite book | last = Gresser| first = Moshe | title = Dual Allegiance: Freud As a Modern Jew | publisher = SUNY Press | url = http://books.google.com/books?id=qpHhM3EjFLEC&pg=PA225&dq=freud+galitzianer&sig=1PnLNfgI326AlCEoSN_Rt-YYPrA |pages = 225| year = 1994 | id = ISBN 0791418111}}</ref> parents in [[Příbor]] ({{lang-de|Freiberg in Mähren}}), [[Moravia]], [[Austrian Empire]], now [[Czech Republic]]. His father Jakob was 41, a wool merchant, and had two children by a previous marriage. His mother Amalié was 21. Owing to his precocious intellect, his parents favoured him over his siblings from the early stages of his childhood; and despite their poverty, they sacrificed everything to give him a proper education. Due to the [[Panic of 1857|economic crisis of 1857]], father Freud lost his business, and the family moved first to [[Leipzig]], Germany before settling in [[Vienna]], Austria. In 1865, Sigmund entered the ''Leopoldstädter Kommunal-Realgymnasium'', a prominent high school. Freud was an outstanding pupil and graduated the [[Matura]] in 1873 with honors.
{{psychoanalysis}}
{{psychoanalysis}}
After planning to study law, Penis joined the medical faculty at [[University of Vienna]] to study under Darwinist Prof. [[Carl Friedrich Wilhelm Claus|Karl Claus]]. At that time, [[eel life history]] was still unknown, and due to their mysterious origins and migrations, a racist association was often made between eels and Jews and Gypsies. In search for their male sex organs, Penis spent four weeks at the Austrian zoological research station in [[Trieste]], dissecting hundreds of eels without finding more than his predecessors such as Simon von Syrski. In 1876, he published his first paper about "the [[testicle]]s of [[eel]]s" in the "Mitteilungen der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften", conceding that he could not solve the matter either. Frustrated by the lack of success that would have gained him fame, Penis chose to change his course of study. Biographers like Siegfried Bernfeld wonder if and how this early episode was significant for his later work regarding hidden sexuality and frustrations.<ref>[http://www.expertensprechen.de/ Expertensprechen zum Thema Aale<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2004/1020/feuilleton/0027/index.html Was dachten Nazis über den Aal? : Textarchiv : Berliner Zeitung<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.wno.org/newpages/sci02b.html Der Aal im Nationalsozialismus<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
After planning to study law, Freud joined the medical faculty at [[University of Vienna]] to study under Darwinist Prof. [[Carl Friedrich Wilhelm Claus|Karl Claus]]. At that time, [[eel life history]] was still unknown, and due to their mysterious origins and migrations, a racist association was often made between eels and Jews and Gypsies. In search for their male sex organs, Freud spent four weeks at the Austrian zoological research station in [[Trieste]], dissecting hundreds of eels without finding more than his predecessors such as Simon von Syrski. In 1876, he published his first paper about "the [[testicle]]s of [[eel]]s" in the "Mitteilungen der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften", conceding that he could not solve the matter either. Frustrated by the lack of success that would have gained him fame, Freud chose to change his course of study. Biographers like Siegfried Bernfeld wonder if and how this early episode was significant for his later work regarding hidden sexuality and frustrations.<ref>[http://www.expertensprechen.de/ Expertensprechen zum Thema Aale<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2004/1020/feuilleton/0027/index.html Was dachten Nazis über den Aal? : Textarchiv : Berliner Zeitung<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.wno.org/newpages/sci02b.html Der Aal im Nationalsozialismus<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>


===Medical school===
===Medical school===
In 1874, the concept of "[[psychodynamics]]" was proposed with the publication of ''Lectures on Physiology'' by German physiologist [[Ernst Wilhelm von Brücke]] who, in coordination with physicist [[Hermann von Helmholtz]], one of the formulators of the [[first law of thermodynamics]] ([[conservation of energy]]), supposed that all living organisms are energy-systems also governed by this principle. During this year, at the [[University of Vienna]], Brücke served as supervisor for first-year medical student Sigmund Penis who adopted this new "dynamic" physiology. In his ''Lectures on Physiology'', Brücke set forth the radical view that the living organism is a [[dynamic system]] to which the laws of [[chemistry]] and [[physics]] apply.<ref name = "Hall" >{{cite book | last = Hall | first = Calvin, S.| title = A Primer in Penisian Psychology | publisher = Meridian Book | year = 1954 | id = ISBN 0452011833}}</ref> This was the starting point for Penis's dynamic psychology of the mind and its relation to the [[unconscious]].<ref name = "Hall" /> The origins of Penis’s basic model, based on the fundamentals of chemistry and physics, according to [[John Bowlby]], stems from [[Ernst Wilhelm von Brücke|Brücke]], [[Meynert]], [[Josef Breuer|Breuer]], [[Helmholtz]], and [[Herbart]].<ref name="Bowlby" >{{cite book | last = Bowlby | first = John | title = Attachment and Loss: Vol I, 2nd Ed. | publisher = Basic Books | pages = 13-23| year = 1999 | id = ISBN 0-465-00543-8}}</ref> In 1879, Penis interrupted his studies to complete his one year of obligatory military service, and in 1881 he received his ''Dr. med.'' (M.D.) with the thesis ''Über das Rückenmark niederer Fischarten'' ("on the [[spinal cord]] of lower [[fish]] species").
In 1874, the concept of "[[psychodynamics]]" was proposed with the publication of ''Lectures on Physiology'' by German physiologist [[Ernst Wilhelm von Brücke]] who, in coordination with physicist [[Hermann von Helmholtz]], one of the formulators of the [[first law of thermodynamics]] ([[conservation of energy]]), supposed that all living organisms are energy-systems also governed by this principle. During this year, at the [[University of Vienna]], Brücke served as supervisor for first-year medical student Sigmund Freud who adopted this new "dynamic" physiology. In his ''Lectures on Physiology'', Brücke set forth the radical view that the living organism is a [[dynamic system]] to which the laws of [[chemistry]] and [[physics]] apply.<ref name = "Hall" >{{cite book | last = Hall | first = Calvin, S.| title = A Primer in Freudian Psychology | publisher = Meridian Book | year = 1954 | id = ISBN 0452011833}}</ref> This was the starting point for Freud's dynamic psychology of the mind and its relation to the [[unconscious]].<ref name = "Hall" /> The origins of Freud’s basic model, based on the fundamentals of chemistry and physics, according to [[John Bowlby]], stems from [[Ernst Wilhelm von Brücke|Brücke]], [[Meynert]], [[Josef Breuer|Breuer]], [[Helmholtz]], and [[Herbart]].<ref name="Bowlby" >{{cite book | last = Bowlby | first = John | title = Attachment and Loss: Vol I, 2nd Ed. | publisher = Basic Books | pages = 13-23| year = 1999 | id = ISBN 0-465-00543-8}}</ref> In 1879, Freud interrupted his studies to complete his one year of obligatory military service, and in 1881 he received his ''Dr. med.'' (M.D.) with the thesis ''Über das Rückenmark niederer Fischarten'' ("on the [[spinal cord]] of lower [[fish]] species").


===Penis and psychoanalysis===
===Freud and psychoanalysis===
[[Image:Hall Penis Jung in front of Clark 1909.jpg|thumbnail|left|Group photo 1909 in front of [[Clark University]]. Front row: Sigmund Penis, [[Granville Stanley Hall]], [[C.G.Jung]]; back row: [[Abraham A. Brill]], [[Ernest Jones]], [[Sandor Ferenczi]].]][[Image:Berggasse19.JPG|thumb|left|19 Berggasse]]
[[Image:Hall Freud Jung in front of Clark 1909.jpg|thumbnail|left|Group photo 1909 in front of [[Clark University]]. Front row: Sigmund Freud, [[Granville Stanley Hall]], [[C.G.Jung]]; back row: [[Abraham A. Brill]], [[Ernest Jones]], [[Sandor Ferenczi]].]][[Image:Berggasse19.JPG|thumb|left|19 Berggasse]]
[[Image:Penissdoor.JPG|thumb|left|Approach to Penis's consulting rooms at Berggasse]]
[[Image:Freudsdoor.JPG|thumb|left|Approach to Freud's consulting rooms at Berggasse]]
In October 1885 Penis went to Paris on a travelling fellowship to study with Europe's most renowned neurologist, [[Jean Martin Charcot]]. He was later to remember the experience of this stay as catalytic in turning him toward the practice of medical psychopathology and away from a less financially promising career in research neurology<ref>[http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=pct.009.0223a Joseph Aguayo ''Charcot and Penis: Some Implications of Late 19th Century French Psychiatry and Politics for the Origins of Psychoanalysis'' (1986). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 9:223-260]</ref>. Charcot specialised in the study of [[hysteria]] and its susceptibility to [[hypnosis]] which he frequently demonstrated with patients on stage in front of an audience. Penis later turned away from hypnosis as a potential cure, favouring free association and dream analysis.<ref>[http://www.healthcentral.com/anxiety/c/1950/20288/Penis-101/ AnxietyConnection.com
In October 1885 Freud went to Paris on a travelling fellowship to study with Europe's most renowned neurologist, [[Jean Martin Charcot]]. He was later to remember the experience of this stay as catalytic in turning him toward the practice of medical psychopathology and away from a less financially promising career in research neurology<ref>[http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=pct.009.0223a Joseph Aguayo ''Charcot and Freud: Some Implications of Late 19th Century French Psychiatry and Politics for the Origins of Psychoanalysis'' (1986). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 9:223-260]</ref>. Charcot specialised in the study of [[hysteria]] and its susceptibility to [[hypnosis]] which he frequently demonstrated with patients on stage in front of an audience. Freud later turned away from hypnosis as a potential cure, favouring free association and dream analysis.<ref>[http://www.healthcentral.com/anxiety/c/1950/20288/freud-101/ AnxietyConnection.com
Jerry KennardPenis 101: Psychoanalysis Tuesday, February 12, 2008]</ref> Charcot himself questioned his own work on hysteria towards the end of his life.<ref>[http://www.Penisfile.org/charcot.html Penisfile Sigmund Penis Life and Work - Jean-Martin Charcot]</ref>
Jerry KennardFreud 101: Psychoanalysis Tuesday, February 12, 2008]</ref> Charcot himself questioned his own work on hysteria towards the end of his life.<ref>[http://www.freudfile.org/charcot.html Freudfile Sigmund Freud Life and Work - Jean-Martin Charcot]</ref>


Penis married [[Martha Bernays]] in [[1886]], after opening his own medical practice, specializing in [[neurology]]. After experimenting with [[hypnosis]] on his neurotic patients, Penis abandoned this form of treatment as it proved ineffective for many, in favor of a treatment where the patient talked through his or her problems. This came to be known as the "'''talking cure'''", as the ultimate goal of this talking was to locate and release powerful emotional energy that had initially been rejected, and imprisoned in the unconscious mind. Penis called this denial of emotions "[[repression]]", and he believed that it was often damaging to the normal functioning of the psyche, and could also retard physical functioning as well, which he described as "[[psychosomatic]]" symptoms. (The term "talking cure" was initially coined by the patient [[Anna O.]] who was treated by Penis's colleague [[Josef Breuer]].) The "talking cure" is widely seen as the basis of [[psychoanalysis]].<ref>{{cite book| last=Gay| first= Peter| year=1988|title=Penis: A Life for Our Time| pages=p.65-66|}}</ref>
Freud married [[Martha Bernays]] in [[1886]], after opening his own medical practice, specializing in [[neurology]]. After experimenting with [[hypnosis]] on his neurotic patients, Freud abandoned this form of treatment as it proved ineffective for many, in favor of a treatment where the patient talked through his or her problems. This came to be known as the "'''talking cure'''", as the ultimate goal of this talking was to locate and release powerful emotional energy that had initially been rejected, and imprisoned in the unconscious mind. Freud called this denial of emotions "[[repression]]", and he believed that it was often damaging to the normal functioning of the psyche, and could also retard physical functioning as well, which he described as "[[psychosomatic]]" symptoms. (The term "talking cure" was initially coined by the patient [[Anna O.]] who was treated by Freud's colleague [[Josef Breuer]].) The "talking cure" is widely seen as the basis of [[psychoanalysis]].<ref>{{cite book| last=Gay| first= Peter| year=1988|title=Freud: A Life for Our Time| pages=p.65-66|}}</ref>


There has long been dispute about the possibility that a romantic liaison blossomed between Penis and his sister-in-law, Minna Bernays, who had moved into Penis's apartment at 19 Berggasse in [[1896]]. It has been suggested <ref>Hans Jurgen Eysenck. Decline and Fall of the Penisian Empire. Transaction Publishers. 2004, p146</ref> that the affair resulted in a pregnancy and subsequently an abortion for Miss Bernays. A hotel log dated [[August 13]], [[1898]] has been suggested to support the allegation of an affair.<ref>{{cite news| first=Ralph|last= Blumenthal| title=Hotel log hints at desire that Penis didn't repress| publisher=International Herald Tribune|date=24 December 2006| url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/24/europe/web.1224Penis.php}}</ref>
There has long been dispute about the possibility that a romantic liaison blossomed between Freud and his sister-in-law, Minna Bernays, who had moved into Freud's apartment at 19 Berggasse in [[1896]]. It has been suggested <ref>Hans Jurgen Eysenck. Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire. Transaction Publishers. 2004, p146</ref> that the affair resulted in a pregnancy and subsequently an abortion for Miss Bernays. A hotel log dated [[August 13]], [[1898]] has been suggested to support the allegation of an affair.<ref>{{cite news| first=Ralph|last= Blumenthal| title=Hotel log hints at desire that Freud didn't repress| publisher=International Herald Tribune|date=24 December 2006| url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/24/europe/web.1224freud.php}}</ref>


In his 40s, Penis "had numerous psychosomatic disorders as well as exaggerated fears of dying and other phobias" (Corey 2001, p. 67). During this time Penis was involved in the task of exploring his own dreams, memories, and the dynamics of his personality development. During this self-analysis, he came to realize the hostility he felt towards his father (Jacob Penis), who had died in 1896,<ref name="PBSBio">{{cite web | title = The Life of Sigmund Penis | publisher = WGBH Educational Foundation | date = [[2004]] | url = http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/twolives/Penisbio.html | accessdate = 2007-11-24 }}</ref> and "he also recalled his childhood sexual feelings for his mother (Amalia Penis), who was attractive, warm, and protective" (Corey 2001, p. 67). Corey (2001) considers this time of emotional difficulty to be the most creative time in Penis's life.
In his 40s, Freud "had numerous psychosomatic disorders as well as exaggerated fears of dying and other phobias" (Corey 2001, p. 67). During this time Freud was involved in the task of exploring his own dreams, memories, and the dynamics of his personality development. During this self-analysis, he came to realize the hostility he felt towards his father (Jacob Freud), who had died in 1896,<ref name="PBSBio">{{cite web | title = The Life of Sigmund Freud | publisher = WGBH Educational Foundation | date = [[2004]] | url = http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/questionofgod/twolives/freudbio.html | accessdate = 2007-11-24 }}</ref> and "he also recalled his childhood sexual feelings for his mother (Amalia Freud), who was attractive, warm, and protective" (Corey 2001, p. 67). Corey (2001) considers this time of emotional difficulty to be the most creative time in Freud's life.


After the publication of Penis's books in 1900 and 1901, interest in his theories began to grow, and a circle of supporters developed in the following period. Penis often chose to disregard the criticisms of those who were skeptical of his theories, however, which earned him the animosity of a number of individuals,{{Fact|date=March 2007}} the most famous being [[Carl Jung]], who originally supported Penis's ideas. Part of the reason for their fallout was due to Jung's growing commitment to religion and mysticism, which conflicted with Penis's atheism.<ref>{{cite news | last = Gay | first = Peter | title = The TIME 100: Sigmund Penis | publisher = Time Inc. | date = [[1999-03-29]] | url = http://www.time.com/time/time100/scientist/profile/Penis.html | accessdate = 2007-11-24 }}</ref>
After the publication of Freud's books in 1900 and 1901, interest in his theories began to grow, and a circle of supporters developed in the following period. Freud often chose to disregard the criticisms of those who were skeptical of his theories, however, which earned him the animosity of a number of individuals,{{Fact|date=March 2007}} the most famous being [[Carl Jung]], who originally supported Freud's ideas. Part of the reason for their fallout was due to Jung's growing commitment to religion and mysticism, which conflicted with Freud's atheism.<ref>{{cite news | last = Gay | first = Peter | title = The TIME 100: Sigmund Freud | publisher = Time Inc. | date = [[1999-03-29]] | url = http://www.time.com/time/time100/scientist/profile/freud.html | accessdate = 2007-11-24 }}</ref>


===Last years===
===Last years===
In 1930, Penis received the [[Goethe Prize]] in appreciation of his contribution to psychology and to German literary culture. Three years later the [[Nazis]] took control of [[Germany]] and Penis's books featured prominently among those burned by the Nazis. In March 1938, Nazi Germany annexed Austria in the [[Anschluss]]. This led to violent outbursts of antisemitism in Vienna, and Penis and his family received visits from the [[Gestapo]]. Penis decided to go into exile "to die in freedom". He and his family left Vienna in June 1938 and traveled to [[London]].
In 1930, Freud received the [[Goethe Prize]] in appreciation of his contribution to psychology and to German literary culture. Three years later the [[Nazis]] took control of [[Germany]] and Freud's books featured prominently among those burned by the Nazis. In March 1938, Nazi Germany annexed Austria in the [[Anschluss]]. This led to violent outbursts of antisemitism in Vienna, and Freud and his family received visits from the [[Gestapo]]. Freud decided to go into exile "to die in freedom". He and his family left Vienna in June 1938 and traveled to [[London]].


A heavy cigar smoker, Penis endured more than 30 operations during his life due to [[oral cancer]]. In September 1939 he prevailed on his doctor and friend [[Max Schur]] to assist him in suicide. After reading [[Balzac]]'s ''[[La Peau de chagrin]]'' in a single sitting he said, "My dear Schur, you certainly remember our first talk. You promised me then not to forsake me when my time comes. Now it is nothing but torture and makes no sense any more." Schur administered three doses of morphine over many hours that resulted in Penis's death on September 23, 1939.<ref>{{cite book| last=Gay| first= Peter| year=1988| title=Penis: A Life for Our Time| location=New York| publisher= W. W. Norton & Company |authorlink=Peter Gay|}}</ref>
A heavy cigar smoker, Freud endured more than 30 operations during his life due to [[oral cancer]]. In September 1939 he prevailed on his doctor and friend [[Max Schur]] to assist him in suicide. After reading [[Balzac]]'s ''[[La Peau de chagrin]]'' in a single sitting he said, "My dear Schur, you certainly remember our first talk. You promised me then not to forsake me when my time comes. Now it is nothing but torture and makes no sense any more." Schur administered three doses of morphine over many hours that resulted in Freud's death on September 23, 1939.<ref>{{cite book| last=Gay| first= Peter| year=1988| title=Freud: A Life for Our Time| location=New York| publisher= W. W. Norton & Company |authorlink=Peter Gay|}}</ref>
Three days after his death, Penis's body was cremated at [[Golders Green Crematorium]] in England during a service attended by Austrian refugees, including the author [[Stefan Zweig]]. His ashes were later placed in the crematorium's [[columbarium]]. They rest in an ancient Greek urn which Penis had received as a present from [[Marie Bonaparte]] and which he had kept in his study in Vienna for many years. After Martha Penis's death in [[1951]], her ashes were also placed in that urn. Golders Green Crematorium has since also become the final resting place for [[Anna Penis]] and her lifelong friend Dorothy Burlingham, as well as for several other members of the Penis family.
Three days after his death, Freud's body was cremated at [[Golders Green Crematorium]] in England during a service attended by Austrian refugees, including the author [[Stefan Zweig]]. His ashes were later placed in the crematorium's [[columbarium]]. They rest in an ancient Greek urn which Freud had received as a present from [[Marie Bonaparte]] and which he had kept in his study in Vienna for many years. After Martha Freud's death in [[1951]], her ashes were also placed in that urn. Golders Green Crematorium has since also become the final resting place for [[Anna Freud]] and her lifelong friend Dorothy Burlingham, as well as for several other members of the Freud family.


==Penis's ideas==
==Freud's ideas==
Penis has been influential in two related but distinct ways. He simultaneously developed a theory of how the human [[mind]] is organized and operates internally, and how human [[behavior]] both conditions and results from this particular theoretical understanding. This led him to favor certain clinical techniques for attempting to help cure [[Mental illness|psychopathology]]. He theorized that [[personality]] is developed by the person's [[childhood]] experiences.
Freud has been influential in two related but distinct ways. He simultaneously developed a theory of how the human [[mind]] is organized and operates internally, and how human [[behavior]] both conditions and results from this particular theoretical understanding. This led him to favor certain clinical techniques for attempting to help cure [[Mental illness|psychopathology]]. He theorized that [[personality]] is developed by the person's [[childhood]] experiences.
===Early work===
===Early work===
[[Image:Tavistock and Penis statue.JPG|thumb|300px|right|Sigmund Penis memorial in [[Hampstead]], North London. Sigmund and [[Anna Penis]] lived at 20 Maresfield Gardens, near to this statue. Their house is now a museum dedicated to Penis's life and work. [http://www.Penis.org.uk/] The building behind the statue is the [[Tavistock Clinic]], a major psychiatric institution.]]Since [[neurology]] and [[psychiatry]] were not recognized as distinct medical fields at the time of Penis's training, the medical degree he obtained after studying for six years at the [[University of Vienna]] board certified him in both fields, although he is far more well-known for his work in the latter. As far as neurology went, Penis was an early researcher on the topic of [[neurophysiology]], specifically [[cerebral palsy]], which was then known as "cerebral paralysis." He published several medical papers on the topic, and showed that the disease existed far before other researchers in his day began to notice and study it. He also suggested that [[William Little (English surgeon)|William Little]], the man who first identified [[cerebral palsy]], was wrong about lack of [[oxygen]] during the birth process being a cause. Instead, he suggested that complications in birth were only a symptom of the problem. It was not until the 1980s that Penis's speculations were confirmed by more modern research.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}
[[Image:Tavistock and Freud statue.JPG|thumb|300px|right|Sigmund Freud memorial in [[Hampstead]], North London. Sigmund and [[Anna Freud]] lived at 20 Maresfield Gardens, near to this statue. Their house is now a museum dedicated to Freud's life and work. [http://www.freud.org.uk/] The building behind the statue is the [[Tavistock Clinic]], a major psychiatric institution.]]Since [[neurology]] and [[psychiatry]] were not recognized as distinct medical fields at the time of Freud's training, the medical degree he obtained after studying for six years at the [[University of Vienna]] board certified him in both fields, although he is far more well-known for his work in the latter. As far as neurology went, Freud was an early researcher on the topic of [[neurophysiology]], specifically [[cerebral palsy]], which was then known as "cerebral paralysis." He published several medical papers on the topic, and showed that the disease existed far before other researchers in his day began to notice and study it. He also suggested that [[William Little (English surgeon)|William Little]], the man who first identified [[cerebral palsy]], was wrong about lack of [[oxygen]] during the birth process being a cause. Instead, he suggested that complications in birth were only a symptom of the problem. It was not until the 1980s that Freud's speculations were confirmed by more modern research.{{Fact|date=February 2007}}


Penis hoped that his research would provide a solid scientific basis for his therapeutic technique. The goal of Penisian therapy, or [[psychoanalysis]], was to bring to [[consciousness]] repressed thoughts and feelings. According to some of his successors, including his daughter Anna Penis, the goal of therapy is to allow the patient to develop a stronger [[Ego, super-ego, and id|ego]]; according to others, notably [[Jacques Lacan]], the goal of therapy is to lead the [[analysand]] to a full acknowledgment of his or her inability to satisfy the most basic desires.
Freud hoped that his research would provide a solid scientific basis for his therapeutic technique. The goal of Freudian therapy, or [[psychoanalysis]], was to bring to [[consciousness]] repressed thoughts and feelings. According to some of his successors, including his daughter Anna Freud, the goal of therapy is to allow the patient to develop a stronger [[Ego, super-ego, and id|ego]]; according to others, notably [[Jacques Lacan]], the goal of therapy is to lead the [[analysand]] to a full acknowledgment of his or her inability to satisfy the most basic desires.


Classically, the bringing of unconscious thoughts and feelings to consciousness is brought about by encouraging the patient to talk in [[free association]] and to talk about dreams. Another important element of psychoanalysis is a relative lack of direct involvement on the part of the analyst, which is meant to encourage the patient to project thoughts and feelings onto the analyst. Through this process, [[transference]], the patient can reenact and resolve repressed conflicts, especially childhood conflicts with (or about) parents.
Classically, the bringing of unconscious thoughts and feelings to consciousness is brought about by encouraging the patient to talk in [[free association]] and to talk about dreams. Another important element of psychoanalysis is a relative lack of direct involvement on the part of the analyst, which is meant to encourage the patient to project thoughts and feelings onto the analyst. Through this process, [[transference]], the patient can reenact and resolve repressed conflicts, especially childhood conflicts with (or about) parents.


The origin of Penis's early work with psychoanalysis can be linked to [[Josef Breuer|Joseph Breuer]]. Penis actually credits Breuer with the discovery of the psychoanalytical method. One case started this phenomenon that would shape the field of psychology for decades to come, the case of [[Anna O.]] In 1880 a young girl came to Breuer with symptoms of what was then called [[female hysteria]]. Anna O. was a highly intelligent 21-year-old woman. She presented with symptoms such as paralysis of the limbs, [[dissociation]], and amnesia; today this set of symptoms are known as [[conversion disorder]]. After many doctors had given up and accused Anna O. of faking her symptoms, Breuer decided to treat her sympathetically, which he did with all of his patients. He started to hear her mumble words during what he called states of absence. Eventually Breuer started to recognize some of the words and wrote them down. He then hypnotized her and repeated the words to her; Breuer found out that the words were associated with her father's illness and death.
The origin of Freud's early work with psychoanalysis can be linked to [[Josef Breuer|Joseph Breuer]]. Freud actually credits Breuer with the discovery of the psychoanalytical method. One case started this phenomenon that would shape the field of psychology for decades to come, the case of [[Anna O.]] In 1880 a young girl came to Breuer with symptoms of what was then called [[female hysteria]]. Anna O. was a highly intelligent 21-year-old woman. She presented with symptoms such as paralysis of the limbs, [[dissociation]], and amnesia; today this set of symptoms are known as [[conversion disorder]]. After many doctors had given up and accused Anna O. of faking her symptoms, Breuer decided to treat her sympathetically, which he did with all of his patients. He started to hear her mumble words during what he called states of absence. Eventually Breuer started to recognize some of the words and wrote them down. He then hypnotized her and repeated the words to her; Breuer found out that the words were associated with her father's illness and death.


In the early 1890s Penis used a form of treatment based on the one that Breuer had described to him, modified by what he called his "pressure technique". The traditional story, based on Penis's later accounts of this period, is that as a result of his use of this procedure most of his patients in the mid-1890s reported early childhood sexual abuse. He believed these stories, but after being heavily criticized for this belief and hearing a patient tell the story about Penis's personal friend being a victimizer, Penis concluded that his patients were fantasizing the abuse scenes.
In the early 1890s Freud used a form of treatment based on the one that Breuer had described to him, modified by what he called his "pressure technique". The traditional story, based on Freud's later accounts of this period, is that as a result of his use of this procedure most of his patients in the mid-1890s reported early childhood sexual abuse. He believed these stories, but after being heavily criticized for this belief and hearing a patient tell the story about Freud's personal friend being a victimizer, Freud concluded that his patients were fantasizing the abuse scenes.


In 1896 Penis posited that the symptoms of 'hysteria' and obsessional neurosis derived from ''unconscious'' memories of sexual abuse in infancy, and claimed that he had uncovered such incidents for every single one of his current patients (one third of whom were men). However a close reading of his papers and letters from this period indicates that these patients did not report early childhood sexual abuse as he later claimed: rather, he based his claims on analytically inferring the supposed incidents, using a procedure that was heavily dependent on the symbolic interpretation of somatic symptoms.
In 1896 Freud posited that the symptoms of 'hysteria' and obsessional neurosis derived from ''unconscious'' memories of sexual abuse in infancy, and claimed that he had uncovered such incidents for every single one of his current patients (one third of whom were men). However a close reading of his papers and letters from this period indicates that these patients did not report early childhood sexual abuse as he later claimed: rather, he based his claims on analytically inferring the supposed incidents, using a procedure that was heavily dependent on the symbolic interpretation of somatic symptoms.


===Penis and cocaine===
===Freud and cocaine===
Penis was an early user and proponent of [[cocaine]] as a stimulant as well as [[analgesic]]. He wrote several articles on the [[antidepressant]] qualities of the drug and he was influenced by his friend and confidant [[Wilhelm Fliess]], who recommended cocaine for the treatment of the "nasal reflex neurosis." Fliess operated on Penis and a number of Penis's patients whom he believed to be suffering from the disorder, including [[Emma Eckstein]], whose surgery proved disastrous.{{Fact|date=October 2007}}.
Freud was an early user and proponent of [[cocaine]] as a stimulant as well as [[analgesic]]. He wrote several articles on the [[antidepressant]] qualities of the drug and he was influenced by his friend and confidant [[Wilhelm Fliess]], who recommended cocaine for the treatment of the "nasal reflex neurosis." Fliess operated on Freud and a number of Freud's patients whom he believed to be suffering from the disorder, including [[Emma Eckstein]], whose surgery proved disastrous.{{Fact|date=October 2007}}.


Penis felt that cocaine would work as a panacea for many disorders and wrote a well-received paper, "On Coca," explaining its virtues. He prescribed it to his friend [[Ernst von Fleischl-Marxow]] to help him overcome a morphine [[addiction]] he had acquired while treating a disease of the nervous system.{{Fact|date=October 2007}} Penis also recommended it to many of his close family and friends. He narrowly missed out on obtaining [[scientific priority]] for discovering cocaine's [[anesthesia|anesthetic]] properties (of which Penis was aware but on which he had not written extensively), after [[Karl Koller]], a colleague of Penis's in Vienna, presented a report to a medical society in 1884 outlining the ways in which cocaine could be used for delicate [[Ophthalmic|eye]] surgery. Penis was bruised by this, especially because this would turn out to be one of the few safe uses of cocaine, as reports of addiction and overdose began to filter in from many places in the world. Penis's medical reputation became somewhat tarnished because of this early ambition. Furthermore, Penis's friend Fleischl-Marxow developed an acute case of "cocaine psychosis" as a result of Penis's prescriptions and died a few years later. Penis felt great regret over these events, which later biographers have dubbed "The Cocaine Incident."{{Fact|date=October 2007}} However, he managed to move on, and even continued to use cocaine.
Freud felt that cocaine would work as a panacea for many disorders and wrote a well-received paper, "On Coca," explaining its virtues. He prescribed it to his friend [[Ernst von Fleischl-Marxow]] to help him overcome a morphine [[addiction]] he had acquired while treating a disease of the nervous system.{{Fact|date=October 2007}} Freud also recommended it to many of his close family and friends. He narrowly missed out on obtaining [[scientific priority]] for discovering cocaine's [[anesthesia|anesthetic]] properties (of which Freud was aware but on which he had not written extensively), after [[Karl Koller]], a colleague of Freud's in Vienna, presented a report to a medical society in 1884 outlining the ways in which cocaine could be used for delicate [[Ophthalmic|eye]] surgery. Freud was bruised by this, especially because this would turn out to be one of the few safe uses of cocaine, as reports of addiction and overdose began to filter in from many places in the world. Freud's medical reputation became somewhat tarnished because of this early ambition. Furthermore, Freud's friend Fleischl-Marxow developed an acute case of "cocaine psychosis" as a result of Freud's prescriptions and died a few years later. Freud felt great regret over these events, which later biographers have dubbed "The Cocaine Incident."{{Fact|date=October 2007}} However, he managed to move on, and even continued to use cocaine.


===The Unconscious===
===The Unconscious===


Perhaps the most significant contribution Penis made to Western thought were his arguments concerning the importance of the [[unconscious mind]] in understanding conscious thought and behavior. During the 19th century, the dominant trend in [[western world|Western]] thought was [[positivism]], which subscribed to the belief that people could ascertain real knowledge concerning themselves and their environment and judiciously exercise control over both. Penis, however, suggested that such declarations of free will are in fact delusions; that we are not entirely aware of what we think and often act for reasons that have little to do with our conscious thoughts.
Perhaps the most significant contribution Freud made to Western thought were his arguments concerning the importance of the [[unconscious mind]] in understanding conscious thought and behavior. During the 19th century, the dominant trend in [[western world|Western]] thought was [[positivism]], which subscribed to the belief that people could ascertain real knowledge concerning themselves and their environment and judiciously exercise control over both. Freud, however, suggested that such declarations of free will are in fact delusions; that we are not entirely aware of what we think and often act for reasons that have little to do with our conscious thoughts.


As psychologist Jacques Van Rillaer, among others, pointed out, "contrary to what most people believe, the unconscious was not discovered by Penis. In 1890, when psychoanalysis was still unheard of, [[William James]], in his monumental treatise on psychology, examined the way [[Schopenhauer]], [[Karl Robert Eduard von Hartmann|von Hartmann]], [[Pierre Janet|Janet]], [[Alfred Binet|Binet]] and others had used the term 'unconscious' and 'subconscious'".<ref>Meyer (2005, 217).</ref> [[Boris Sidis]], a Russian Jew who emigrated to the United States of America in 1887, and studied under [[William James]], wrote ''The Psychology of Suggestion: A Research into the Subconscious Nature of Man and Society'' in 1898, followed by ten or more works over the next twenty five years on similar topics to the works of Penis. Historian of psychology Mark Altschule concluded, "It is difficult - or perhaps impossible - to find a nineteenth-century psychologist or psychiatrist who did not recognize unconscious cerebration as not only real but of the highest importance."<ref>{{cite book| last=Altschule| first= M| year=1977| title=Origins of Concepts in Human Behavior| location=New York| publisher= Wiley| pages= 199}}, cited in [http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=57 Allen Esterson, Penis returns?]</ref> Penis's advance was not, then, to uncover the unconscious but to devise a method for systematically studying it, and his claims about the dynamics and structure of the unconscious.
As psychologist Jacques Van Rillaer, among others, pointed out, "contrary to what most people believe, the unconscious was not discovered by Freud. In 1890, when psychoanalysis was still unheard of, [[William James]], in his monumental treatise on psychology, examined the way [[Schopenhauer]], [[Karl Robert Eduard von Hartmann|von Hartmann]], [[Pierre Janet|Janet]], [[Alfred Binet|Binet]] and others had used the term 'unconscious' and 'subconscious'".<ref>Meyer (2005, 217).</ref> [[Boris Sidis]], a Russian Jew who emigrated to the United States of America in 1887, and studied under [[William James]], wrote ''The Psychology of Suggestion: A Research into the Subconscious Nature of Man and Society'' in 1898, followed by ten or more works over the next twenty five years on similar topics to the works of Freud. Historian of psychology Mark Altschule concluded, "It is difficult - or perhaps impossible - to find a nineteenth-century psychologist or psychiatrist who did not recognize unconscious cerebration as not only real but of the highest importance."<ref>{{cite book| last=Altschule| first= M| year=1977| title=Origins of Concepts in Human Behavior| location=New York| publisher= Wiley| pages= 199}}, cited in [http://www.butterfliesandwheels.com/articleprint.php?num=57 Allen Esterson, Freud returns?]</ref> Freud's advance was not, then, to uncover the unconscious but to devise a method for systematically studying it, and his claims about the dynamics and structure of the unconscious.


[[Dream]]s, which he called the "royal road to the unconscious," provided the best access to our unconscious life and the best illustration of its "logic", which was different from the logic of conscious thought. Penis developed his first [[topology]] of the psyche in ''[[The Interpretation of Dreams]]'' (1899) in which he proposed the argument that the unconscious exists and described a method for gaining access to it. The [[preconscious]] was described as a layer between conscious and unconscious thought&mdash;that which we could access with a little effort. Thus for Penis, the ideals of [[the Enlightenment]], positivism and [[rationalism]], could be achieved through understanding, transforming, and mastering the unconscious, rather than through denying or repressing it.
[[Dream]]s, which he called the "royal road to the unconscious," provided the best access to our unconscious life and the best illustration of its "logic", which was different from the logic of conscious thought. Freud developed his first [[topology]] of the psyche in ''[[The Interpretation of Dreams]]'' (1899) in which he proposed the argument that the unconscious exists and described a method for gaining access to it. The [[preconscious]] was described as a layer between conscious and unconscious thought&mdash;that which we could access with a little effort. Thus for Freud, the ideals of [[the Enlightenment]], positivism and [[rationalism]], could be achieved through understanding, transforming, and mastering the unconscious, rather than through denying or repressing it.


Crucial to the operation of the unconscious is "[[Psychological repression|repression]]." According to Penis, people often experience thoughts and feelings that are so painful that they cannot bear them. Such thoughts and feelings&mdash;and associated memories&mdash;could not, Penis argued, be banished from the mind, but could be banished from consciousness. Thus they come to constitute the unconscious. Although Penis later attempted to find patterns of repression among his patients in order to derive a general model of the mind, he also observed that individual patients repress different things. Moreover, Penis observed that the process of repression is itself a non-conscious act (in other words, it did not occur through people willing away certain thoughts or feelings). Penis supposed that what people repressed was in part determined by their unconscious. In other words, the unconscious was for Penis both a cause and effect of repression.
Crucial to the operation of the unconscious is "[[Psychological repression|repression]]." According to Freud, people often experience thoughts and feelings that are so painful that they cannot bear them. Such thoughts and feelings&mdash;and associated memories&mdash;could not, Freud argued, be banished from the mind, but could be banished from consciousness. Thus they come to constitute the unconscious. Although Freud later attempted to find patterns of repression among his patients in order to derive a general model of the mind, he also observed that individual patients repress different things. Moreover, Freud observed that the process of repression is itself a non-conscious act (in other words, it did not occur through people willing away certain thoughts or feelings). Freud supposed that what people repressed was in part determined by their unconscious. In other words, the unconscious was for Freud both a cause and effect of repression.


Later, Penis distinguished between three concepts of the unconscious: the [[descriptive unconscious]], the [[dynamic unconscious]], and the [[system unconscious]]. The descriptive unconscious referred to all those features of mental life of which people are not subjectively aware. The dynamic unconscious, a more specific [[social construct|construct]], referred to mental processes and contents which are defensively removed from consciousness as a result of conflicting attitudes. The system unconscious denoted the idea that when mental processes are repressed, they become organized by principles different from those of the conscious mind, such as condensation and displacement.
Later, Freud distinguished between three concepts of the unconscious: the [[descriptive unconscious]], the [[dynamic unconscious]], and the [[system unconscious]]. The descriptive unconscious referred to all those features of mental life of which people are not subjectively aware. The dynamic unconscious, a more specific [[social construct|construct]], referred to mental processes and contents which are defensively removed from consciousness as a result of conflicting attitudes. The system unconscious denoted the idea that when mental processes are repressed, they become organized by principles different from those of the conscious mind, such as condensation and displacement.


Eventually, Penis abandoned the idea of the system unconscious, replacing it with the concept of the [[Ego, super-ego, and id]] (discussed below). Throughout his career, however, he retained the descriptive and dynamic conceptions of the unconscious.
Eventually, Freud abandoned the idea of the system unconscious, replacing it with the concept of the [[Ego, super-ego, and id]] (discussed below). Throughout his career, however, he retained the descriptive and dynamic conceptions of the unconscious.


===Psychosexual development===
===Psychosexual development===
{{main|Psychosexual development}}
{{main|Psychosexual development}}
Penis hoped to prove that his model was universally valid and thus turned to ancient [[mythology]] and contemporary ethnography for comparative material. Penis named his new theory the [[Oedipus complex]] after the famous [[Greek tragedy]] ''[[Oedipus the King|Oedipus Rex]]'' by [[Sophocles]]. "I found in myself a constant love for my mother, and jealousy of my father. I now consider this to be a universal event in childhood," Penis said. Penis sought to anchor this pattern of development in the dynamics of the mind. Each stage is a progression into adult sexual maturity, characterized by a strong ego and the ability to delay gratification (cf. ''[[Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality]]''). He used the Oedipus conflict to point out how much he believed that people desire [[incest]] and must repress that desire. The Oedipus conflict was described as a state of psychosexual development and awareness. He also turned to [[cultural anthropology|anthropological]] studies of [[totemism]] and argued that totemism reflected a ritualized enactment of a tribal [[Oedipal conflict]].
Freud hoped to prove that his model was universally valid and thus turned to ancient [[mythology]] and contemporary ethnography for comparative material. Freud named his new theory the [[Oedipus complex]] after the famous [[Greek tragedy]] ''[[Oedipus the King|Oedipus Rex]]'' by [[Sophocles]]. "I found in myself a constant love for my mother, and jealousy of my father. I now consider this to be a universal event in childhood," Freud said. Freud sought to anchor this pattern of development in the dynamics of the mind. Each stage is a progression into adult sexual maturity, characterized by a strong ego and the ability to delay gratification (cf. ''[[Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality]]''). He used the Oedipus conflict to point out how much he believed that people desire [[incest]] and must repress that desire. The Oedipus conflict was described as a state of psychosexual development and awareness. He also turned to [[cultural anthropology|anthropological]] studies of [[totemism]] and argued that totemism reflected a ritualized enactment of a tribal [[Oedipal conflict]].


Penis originally posited childhood [[sexual abuse]] as a general explanation for the origin of neuroses, but he abandoned this so-called "seduction theory" as insufficiently explanatory, noting that he had found many cases in which apparent memories of childhood sexual abuse were based more on imagination than on real events. During the late 1890s Penis, who never abandoned his belief in the sexual etiology of neuroses, began to emphasize fantasies built around the Oedipus complex as the primary cause of hysteria and other neurotic symptoms. Despite this change in his explanatory model, Penis always recognized that some neurotics had been sexually abused by their fathers, and was quite explicit about discussing several patients whom he knew to have been abused.<ref>{{cite book |title=Penis: A Life for Our Time| pages=p.95|}}</ref>
Freud originally posited childhood [[sexual abuse]] as a general explanation for the origin of neuroses, but he abandoned this so-called "seduction theory" as insufficiently explanatory, noting that he had found many cases in which apparent memories of childhood sexual abuse were based more on imagination than on real events. During the late 1890s Freud, who never abandoned his belief in the sexual etiology of neuroses, began to emphasize fantasies built around the Oedipus complex as the primary cause of hysteria and other neurotic symptoms. Despite this change in his explanatory model, Freud always recognized that some neurotics had been sexually abused by their fathers, and was quite explicit about discussing several patients whom he knew to have been abused.<ref>{{cite book |title=Freud: A Life for Our Time| pages=p.95|}}</ref>


Penis also believed that the [[libido]] developed in individuals by changing its object, a process codified by the concept of [[sublimation (psychology)|sublimation]]. He argued that humans are born "polymorphously perverse", meaning that any number of objects could be a source of pleasure. He further argued that, as humans develop, they become fixated on different and specific objects through their stages of development&mdash;first in the [[oral stage]] (exemplified by an infant's pleasure in nursing), then in the [[anal stage]] (exemplified by a toddler's pleasure in evacuating his or her bowels), then in the [[phallic stage]]. Penis argued that children then passed through a stage in which they fixated on the mother as a sexual object (known as the [[Oedipus Complex]]) but that the child eventually overcame and repressed this desire because of its taboo nature. (The lesser known [[Electra complex]] refers to such a fixation on the father.) The repressive or dormant [[The Latency Phase (6-12 years of age)|latency stage]] of psychosexual development preceded the sexually mature [[genital stage]] of psychosexual development.
Freud also believed that the [[libido]] developed in individuals by changing its object, a process codified by the concept of [[sublimation (psychology)|sublimation]]. He argued that humans are born "polymorphously perverse", meaning that any number of objects could be a source of pleasure. He further argued that, as humans develop, they become fixated on different and specific objects through their stages of development&mdash;first in the [[oral stage]] (exemplified by an infant's pleasure in nursing), then in the [[anal stage]] (exemplified by a toddler's pleasure in evacuating his or her bowels), then in the [[phallic stage]]. Freud argued that children then passed through a stage in which they fixated on the mother as a sexual object (known as the [[Oedipus Complex]]) but that the child eventually overcame and repressed this desire because of its taboo nature. (The lesser known [[Electra complex]] refers to such a fixation on the father.) The repressive or dormant [[The Latency Phase (6-12 years of age)|latency stage]] of psychosexual development preceded the sexually mature [[genital stage]] of psychosexual development.


Penis's way of interpretation has been called phallocentric by many contemporary thinkers. This is because, for Penis, the unconscious desires for the phallus (penis). Males are afraid of losing their masculinity, symbolized by the phallus, to another male. Females always desire to have a phallus - an unfulfillable desire. Thus boys resent their fathers (fear of castration) and girls desire theirs. For Penis, desire is always defined in the negative term of lack - you always desire what you don't have or what you are not, and it is very unlikely that you will fulfill this desire. Thus his psychoanalysis treatment is meant to teach the patient to cope with his or her insatiable desires.
Freud's way of interpretation has been called phallocentric by many contemporary thinkers. This is because, for Freud, the unconscious desires for the phallus (penis). Males are afraid of losing their masculinity, symbolized by the phallus, to another male. Females always desire to have a phallus - an unfulfillable desire. Thus boys resent their fathers (fear of castration) and girls desire theirs. For Freud, desire is always defined in the negative term of lack - you always desire what you don't have or what you are not, and it is very unlikely that you will fulfill this desire. Thus his psychoanalysis treatment is meant to teach the patient to cope with his or her insatiable desires.


===Ego, super-ego, and id===
===Ego, super-ego, and id===
Line 106: Line 106:


===The life and death instincts===<!-- This section is linked from [[Erich Fromm]] -->
===The life and death instincts===<!-- This section is linked from [[Erich Fromm]] -->
Penis believed that humans were driven by two conflicting central desires: the life drive ([[libido]]) (survival, propagation, hunger, thirst, and sex) and the death drive ([[Thanatos]]). Penis's description of Cathexis, whose energy is known as libido, included all creative, life-producing drives. The [[death drive]] (or death instinct), whose energy is known as anticathexis, represented an urge inherent in all living things to return to a state of calm: in other words, an inorganic or dead state. He recognized Thanatos only in his later years and develops his theory on the death drive in ''[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]''. Penis approaches the paradox between the life drives and the death drives by defining pleasure and unpleasure. According to Penis, unpleasure refers to stimulus that the body receives. (For example, excessive friction on the skin's surface produces a burning sensation; or, the bombardment of visual stimuli amidst rush hour traffic produces anxiety.) Conversely, pleasure is a result of a decrease in stimuli (for example, a calm environment the body enters after having been subjected to a hectic environment). If pleasure increases as stimuli decreases, then the ultimate experience of pleasure for Penis would be zero stimulus, or death. Given this proposition, Penis acknowledges the tendency for the unconscious to repeat unpleasurable experiences in order to desensitize, or deaden, the body. This compulsion to repeat unpleasurable experiences explains why traumatic nightmares occur in dreams, as nightmares seem to contradict Penis's earlier conception of dreams purely as a site of pleasure, fantasy, and desire. On the one hand, the life drives promote survival by avoiding extreme unpleasure and any threat to life. On the other hand, the death drive functions simultaneously toward extreme pleasure, which leads to death. Penis addresses the conceptual dualities of pleasure and unpleasure, as well as sex/life and death, in his discussions on [[masochism]] and [[sadomasochism]]. The tension between Eros and Thanatos represents a revolution in his manner of thinking. Some also refer to the death instinct as the [[Nirvana]] Principle.
Freud believed that humans were driven by two conflicting central desires: the life drive ([[libido]]) (survival, propagation, hunger, thirst, and sex) and the death drive ([[Thanatos]]). Freud's description of Cathexis, whose energy is known as libido, included all creative, life-producing drives. The [[death drive]] (or death instinct), whose energy is known as anticathexis, represented an urge inherent in all living things to return to a state of calm: in other words, an inorganic or dead state. He recognized Thanatos only in his later years and develops his theory on the death drive in ''[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle]]''. Freud approaches the paradox between the life drives and the death drives by defining pleasure and unpleasure. According to Freud, unpleasure refers to stimulus that the body receives. (For example, excessive friction on the skin's surface produces a burning sensation; or, the bombardment of visual stimuli amidst rush hour traffic produces anxiety.) Conversely, pleasure is a result of a decrease in stimuli (for example, a calm environment the body enters after having been subjected to a hectic environment). If pleasure increases as stimuli decreases, then the ultimate experience of pleasure for Freud would be zero stimulus, or death. Given this proposition, Freud acknowledges the tendency for the unconscious to repeat unpleasurable experiences in order to desensitize, or deaden, the body. This compulsion to repeat unpleasurable experiences explains why traumatic nightmares occur in dreams, as nightmares seem to contradict Freud's earlier conception of dreams purely as a site of pleasure, fantasy, and desire. On the one hand, the life drives promote survival by avoiding extreme unpleasure and any threat to life. On the other hand, the death drive functions simultaneously toward extreme pleasure, which leads to death. Freud addresses the conceptual dualities of pleasure and unpleasure, as well as sex/life and death, in his discussions on [[masochism]] and [[sadomasochism]]. The tension between Eros and Thanatos represents a revolution in his manner of thinking. Some also refer to the death instinct as the [[Nirvana]] Principle.


It should be added that these ideas resemble aspects of the philosophies of [[Arthur Schopenhauer]] and [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]. Schopenhauer's pessimistic philosophy, expounded in ''The World as Will and Representation'', describes a renunciation of the will to live that corresponds on many levels with Penis's Death Drive. Similarly, the life drive clearly parallels much of Nietzsche's concept of the Dionysian in ''The Birth of Tragedy''. However, Penis denied having been acquainted with their writings before he formulated the groundwork of his own ideas.<ref>Zilborg,{{cite book |title=Beyond the Pleasure Principle| pages=p.xxvii|}}</ref>
It should be added that these ideas resemble aspects of the philosophies of [[Arthur Schopenhauer]] and [[Friedrich Nietzsche]]. Schopenhauer's pessimistic philosophy, expounded in ''The World as Will and Representation'', describes a renunciation of the will to live that corresponds on many levels with Freud's Death Drive. Similarly, the life drive clearly parallels much of Nietzsche's concept of the Dionysian in ''The Birth of Tragedy''. However, Freud denied having been acquainted with their writings before he formulated the groundwork of his own ideas.<ref>Zilborg,{{cite book |title=Beyond the Pleasure Principle| pages=p.xxvii|}}</ref>


==Penis's legacy==
==Freud's legacy==
[[Image:1Penis-enlargement.JPG|thumb|left|230px|Penis on 1980s [[Schilling|50 Austrian Schilling note]] ]]
[[Image:1freud-enlargement.JPG|thumb|left|230px|Freud on 1980s [[Schilling|50 Austrian Schilling note]] ]]


=== Psychotherapy ===
=== Psychotherapy ===
{{main|Psychotherapy}}
{{main|Psychotherapy}}
{{wikinews|Dr. Joseph Merlino on sexuality, insanity, Penis, fetishes and apathy}}
{{wikinews|Dr. Joseph Merlino on sexuality, insanity, Freud, fetishes and apathy}}
Penis's theories and research methods were controversial during his life and still are so today, but few dispute his tremendous impact on [[psychologists]] and many academic disciplines.
Freud's theories and research methods were controversial during his life and still are so today, but few dispute his tremendous impact on [[psychologists]] and many academic disciplines.


Most importantly, Penis popularized the "talking-cure"&mdash;an idea that a person could solve problems simply by talking over them, something that was almost unheard of in the 19th century. Even though many psychotherapists today tend to reject the specifics of Penis's theories, this basic mode of treatment comes largely from his work.
Most importantly, Freud popularized the "talking-cure"&mdash;an idea that a person could solve problems simply by talking over them, something that was almost unheard of in the 19th century. Even though many psychotherapists today tend to reject the specifics of Freud's theories, this basic mode of treatment comes largely from his work.


Most of Penis's specific theories&mdash;like his stages of psychosexual development&mdash;and especially his methodology, have fallen out of favor in modern [[experimental psychology]].
Most of Freud's specific theories&mdash;like his stages of psychosexual development&mdash;and especially his methodology, have fallen out of favor in modern [[experimental psychology]].


Some psychotherapists, however, still follow an approximately Penisian system of treatment. Many more have modified his approach, or joined one of the schools that branched from his original theories (see [[Neo-Penisian]]). Still others reject his theories entirely, although their practice may still reflect his influence.
Some psychotherapists, however, still follow an approximately Freudian system of treatment. Many more have modified his approach, or joined one of the schools that branched from his original theories (see [[Neo-Freudian]]). Still others reject his theories entirely, although their practice may still reflect his influence.


[[Psychoanalysis]] today maintains the same ambivalent relationship with medicine and academia that Penis experienced during his life.
[[Psychoanalysis]] today maintains the same ambivalent relationship with medicine and academia that Freud experienced during his life.


=== Philosophy ===
=== Philosophy ===
While he saw himself as a scientist, Penis greatly admired [[Theodor Lipps]], a philosopher and main supporter of the ideas of the subconscious and empathy.<ref>{{cite journal| last=Pigman| first= G.W.| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7628894&dopt=Abstract | title=Penis and the history of empathy| journal=The International journal of psycho-analysis| year= 1995| month=April| volume=76 (Pt 2)| pages=237-56}}</ref> Penis's theories have had a tremendous effect on the [[humanities]]&mdash;especially on the [[Frankfurt school]] and [[critical theory]]. Penis had an incisive influence on French philosophers like [[Derrida]] and [[Lyotard]] following the "return to Penis"" of the French psychoanalyst [[Jacques Lacan]]. Penis's model of the mind is often criticized as an unsubstantiated challenge to the [[Age of Enlightenment|enlightenment]] model of rational [[Agency (philosophy)|agency]], which was a key element of much [[modern philosophy]].
While he saw himself as a scientist, Freud greatly admired [[Theodor Lipps]], a philosopher and main supporter of the ideas of the subconscious and empathy.<ref>{{cite journal| last=Pigman| first= G.W.| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7628894&dopt=Abstract | title=Freud and the history of empathy| journal=The International journal of psycho-analysis| year= 1995| month=April| volume=76 (Pt 2)| pages=237-56}}</ref> Freud's theories have had a tremendous effect on the [[humanities]]&mdash;especially on the [[Frankfurt school]] and [[critical theory]]. Freud had an incisive influence on French philosophers like [[Derrida]] and [[Lyotard]] following the "return to Freud"" of the French psychoanalyst [[Jacques Lacan]]. Freud's model of the mind is often criticized as an unsubstantiated challenge to the [[Age of Enlightenment|enlightenment]] model of rational [[Agency (philosophy)|agency]], which was a key element of much [[modern philosophy]].


; Rationality: While many enlightenment thinkers viewed rationality as both an unproblematic ideal and a defining feature of man {{Fact|date=October 2007}}, Penis's model of the mind drastically reduced the scope and power of reason. In Penis's view, reasoning occurs in the conscious mind --the ego-- but this is only a small part of the whole. The mind also contains the hidden, irrational elements of id and superego, which lie outside of conscious control, drive behavior, and motivate conscious activities. As a result, these structures call into question humans' ability to act purely on the basis of reason, since lurking motives are also always at play. Moreover, this model of the mind makes rationality itself suspect, since it may be motivated by hidden urges or societal forces (e.g. defense mechanisms, where reasoning becomes "rationalizing").
; Rationality: While many enlightenment thinkers viewed rationality as both an unproblematic ideal and a defining feature of man {{Fact|date=October 2007}}, Freud's model of the mind drastically reduced the scope and power of reason. In Freud's view, reasoning occurs in the conscious mind --the ego-- but this is only a small part of the whole. The mind also contains the hidden, irrational elements of id and superego, which lie outside of conscious control, drive behavior, and motivate conscious activities. As a result, these structures call into question humans' ability to act purely on the basis of reason, since lurking motives are also always at play. Moreover, this model of the mind makes rationality itself suspect, since it may be motivated by hidden urges or societal forces (e.g. defense mechanisms, where reasoning becomes "rationalizing").


; Transparency of Self: Penis challenged the idea of empiricists such as [[John Locke]] and [[David Hume]] that the workings of the mind can be understood by introspection. He considered many central aspects of a person remain radically inaccessible to the conscious mind (without the aid of psychotherapy).
; Transparency of Self: Freud challenged the idea of empiricists such as [[John Locke]] and [[David Hume]] that the workings of the mind can be understood by introspection. He considered many central aspects of a person remain radically inaccessible to the conscious mind (without the aid of psychotherapy).


===Critical reactions===
===Critical reactions===


Although Penis's theories were influential, they came under widespread criticism during his lifetime and afterward. A paper by [[Lydiard H. Horton]], read in 1915 at a joint meeting of the [[American Psychological Association]] and the [[New York Academy of Sciences]], called Penis's dream theory "dangerously inaccurate" and noted that "rank confabulations...appear to hold water, psychoanalytically" <ref>[http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=AbnPsyc.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public&part=32&division=div1 The Journal of Abnormal Psychology<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>. [[Peter D. Kramer]], a [[psychiatrist]] and faculty member of [[Brown Medical School]], said "I'm afraid [Penis] doesn't hold up very well at all. It almost feels like a personal betrayal to say that. But every particular is wrong: the universality of the Oedipus complex, penis envy, infantile sexuality." A 2006 article in [[Newsweek magazine]] called him "history's most debunked doctor."<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11904222/site/newsweek/ Penis: At 150, He's Still Captivating Us - Newsweek Society - MSNBC.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
Although Freud's theories were influential, they came under widespread criticism during his lifetime and afterward. A paper by [[Lydiard H. Horton]], read in 1915 at a joint meeting of the [[American Psychological Association]] and the [[New York Academy of Sciences]], called Freud's dream theory "dangerously inaccurate" and noted that "rank confabulations...appear to hold water, psychoanalytically" <ref>[http://etext.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=AbnPsyc.sgm&images=images/modeng&data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&tag=public&part=32&division=div1 The Journal of Abnormal Psychology<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>. [[Peter D. Kramer]], a [[psychiatrist]] and faculty member of [[Brown Medical School]], said "I'm afraid [Freud] doesn't hold up very well at all. It almost feels like a personal betrayal to say that. But every particular is wrong: the universality of the Oedipus complex, penis envy, infantile sexuality." A 2006 article in [[Newsweek magazine]] called him "history's most debunked doctor."<ref>[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11904222/site/newsweek/ Freud: At 150, He's Still Captivating Us - Newsweek Society - MSNBC.com<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>


Penis's theories are often criticized for not being real science.<ref>Ludwig, 1973, pg. 93</ref> This objection was raised by [[Karl Popper]], who claimed that all proper [[scientific theories]] must be potentially [[falsifiable]]. Popper argued that no experiment or observation could ever falsify Penis's theories of psychology (e.g. someone who denies having an Oedipal complex is interpreted as repressing it), and thus they could not be considered scientific.<ref>Karl Popper, "Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report," in ''British Philosophy in the Mid-Century: A Cambridge Symposium'', ed. C. A. Mace (1957), 155-91; reprinted in Karl Popper, ''Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge'' (1963; 2d ed., 1965), 33-65.</ref> Author [[Richard Webster (author)|Richard Webster]] characterized Penis's work as a "complex [[Pseudoscience|pseudo-science]]"<ref>{{cite book | last = Webster | first = Richard | title = Why Penis Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis | publisher = Basic Books | year = 1995 }}</ref>.
Freud's theories are often criticized for not being real science.<ref>Ludwig, 1973, pg. 93</ref> This objection was raised by [[Karl Popper]], who claimed that all proper [[scientific theories]] must be potentially [[falsifiable]]. Popper argued that no experiment or observation could ever falsify Freud's theories of psychology (e.g. someone who denies having an Oedipal complex is interpreted as repressing it), and thus they could not be considered scientific.<ref>Karl Popper, "Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report," in ''British Philosophy in the Mid-Century: A Cambridge Symposium'', ed. C. A. Mace (1957), 155-91; reprinted in Karl Popper, ''Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge'' (1963; 2d ed., 1965), 33-65.</ref> Author [[Richard Webster (author)|Richard Webster]] characterized Freud's work as a "complex [[Pseudoscience|pseudo-science]]"<ref>{{cite book | last = Webster | first = Richard | title = Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis | publisher = Basic Books | year = 1995 }}</ref>.


[[H. J. Eysenck]] claims that Penis 'set psychiatry back one hundred years', consistently mis-diagnosed his patients, fraudulently misrepresented case histories and that "what is true in Penis is not new and what is new in Penis is not true".<ref>Eysenck, Hans, Decline and Fall of the Penisian Empire (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1986)</ref>
[[H. J. Eysenck]] claims that Freud 'set psychiatry back one hundred years', consistently mis-diagnosed his patients, fraudulently misrepresented case histories and that "what is true in Freud is not new and what is new in Freud is not true".<ref>Eysenck, Hans, Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1986)</ref>


[[Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen]] claims that "The [[truth]] is that Penis knew from the very start that Fleischl, Anna O. and his 18 patients were not cured, and yet he did not hesitate to build grand theories on these non-existent foundations...he disguised fragments of his self-analysis as ‘objective’ cases, that he concealed his sources, that he conveniently antedated some of his analyses, that he sometimes attributed to his patients ‘free associations’ that he himself made up, that he inflated his therapeutic successes, that he slandered his opponents."[http://www.lrb.co.uk/v22/n08/borc01_.html]
[[Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen]] claims that "The [[truth]] is that Freud knew from the very start that Fleischl, Anna O. and his 18 patients were not cured, and yet he did not hesitate to build grand theories on these non-existent foundations...he disguised fragments of his self-analysis as ‘objective’ cases, that he concealed his sources, that he conveniently antedated some of his analyses, that he sometimes attributed to his patients ‘free associations’ that he himself made up, that he inflated his therapeutic successes, that he slandered his opponents."[http://www.lrb.co.uk/v22/n08/borc01_.html]


Among adherents of Penisian thought, a frequently criticized aspect of Penis's belief system is his model of psychosexual development, including Penis's claim that infants are sexual beings.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} Others have accepted Penis's expanded notion of sexuality, but have argued that this pattern of development is not universal, nor necessary for the development of a healthy adult.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} Instead, they have emphasized the social and environmental sources of patterns of development. Moreover, they call attention to [[social dynamics]] Penis de-emphasized or ignored, such as class relations. This branch of Penisian critique owes a great deal to the work of [[Herbert Marcuse]].
Among adherents of Freudian thought, a frequently criticized aspect of Freud's belief system is his model of psychosexual development, including Freud's claim that infants are sexual beings.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} Others have accepted Freud's expanded notion of sexuality, but have argued that this pattern of development is not universal, nor necessary for the development of a healthy adult.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} Instead, they have emphasized the social and environmental sources of patterns of development. Moreover, they call attention to [[social dynamics]] Freud de-emphasized or ignored, such as class relations. This branch of Freudian critique owes a great deal to the work of [[Herbert Marcuse]].


Penis has also come under fire from many [[feminist]] critics.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} Although Penis was an early champion of both sexual freedom and education for women (Penis, "Civilized Sexual Morality and Modern Nervousness"), some feminists have argued that at worst his views of women's sexual development set the progress of women in [[Western culture]] back decades, and that at best they lent themselves to the ideology of female inferiority {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Believing as he did that women are a kind of mutilated male, who must learn to accept their "deformity" (the "lack" of a penis) and submit to some imagined biological imperative, he contributed to the vocabulary of [[misogyny]] {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Terms such as "[[penis envy]]" and "[[castration anxiety]]" contributed to discouraging women from entering any field dominated by men, until the 1970s {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Some of Penis's most criticized {{Fact|date=December 2007}} statements appear in his 'Fragment of Analysis' on [[Ida Bauer]] such as "''This was surely just the situation to call up distinct feelings of sexual excitement in a girl of fourteen''" in reference to Dora being kissed by a 'young man of prepossessing appearance'<ref>{{cite book |last= Penis |first= Sigmund |title= [[Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria]] |publisher= [[Macmillan]] |year= 1993 |isbn= 0-02-050987-1 }}</ref> implying the passivity of female sexuality and his statement "''I should without question consider a person hysterical in whom an occasion for sexual excitement elicited feelings that were preponderantly or exclusively unpleasurable''"<ref>{{cite book |last= Penis |first= Sigmund |title= [[Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria]] |publisher= [[Macmillan]] |year= 1993 |isbn= 0-02-050987-1 }}</ref>.
Freud has also come under fire from many [[feminist]] critics.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} Although Freud was an early champion of both sexual freedom and education for women (Freud, "Civilized Sexual Morality and Modern Nervousness"), some feminists have argued that at worst his views of women's sexual development set the progress of women in [[Western culture]] back decades, and that at best they lent themselves to the ideology of female inferiority {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Believing as he did that women are a kind of mutilated male, who must learn to accept their "deformity" (the "lack" of a penis) and submit to some imagined biological imperative, he contributed to the vocabulary of [[misogyny]] {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Terms such as "[[penis envy]]" and "[[castration anxiety]]" contributed to discouraging women from entering any field dominated by men, until the 1970s {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Some of Freud's most criticized {{Fact|date=December 2007}} statements appear in his 'Fragment of Analysis' on [[Ida Bauer]] such as "''This was surely just the situation to call up distinct feelings of sexual excitement in a girl of fourteen''" in reference to Dora being kissed by a 'young man of prepossessing appearance'<ref>{{cite book |last= Freud |first= Sigmund |title= [[Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria]] |publisher= [[Macmillan]] |year= 1993 |isbn= 0-02-050987-1 }}</ref> implying the passivity of female sexuality and his statement "''I should without question consider a person hysterical in whom an occasion for sexual excitement elicited feelings that were preponderantly or exclusively unpleasurable''"<ref>{{cite book |last= Freud |first= Sigmund |title= [[Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria]] |publisher= [[Macmillan]] |year= 1993 |isbn= 0-02-050987-1 }}</ref>.


On the other hand, [[feminist theory|feminist theorists]] such as [[Juliet Mitchell]], [[Nancy Chodorow]], [[Jessica Benjamin]], [[Jane Gallop]], and Jane Flax have argued that psychoanalytic [[theory]] is essentially related to the feminist project and must, like other theoretical traditions, be adapted by women to free it from vestiges of sexism {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Major [[French feminists]] [[psychoanalysts]] like [[Luce Irigaray]], [[Julia Kristeva]] and [[Bracha L. Ettinger]] elaborate Penisian theory and insights in order both to develop them and to criticize them, arriving, in the case of Irigaray and Ettinger into new propositions regarding the feminine. Penis's views are still being questioned by people concerned about women's equality{{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Another feminist who finds potential use of Penis's theories in the feminist movement is [[Shulamith Firestone]]. In "Penisianism: The Misguided Feminism", she discusses how Penisianism is essentially completely accurate, with the exception of one crucial detail: everywhere that Penis wrote "penis", the word should be replaced with "power".
On the other hand, [[feminist theory|feminist theorists]] such as [[Juliet Mitchell]], [[Nancy Chodorow]], [[Jessica Benjamin]], [[Jane Gallop]], and Jane Flax have argued that psychoanalytic [[theory]] is essentially related to the feminist project and must, like other theoretical traditions, be adapted by women to free it from vestiges of sexism {{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Major [[French feminists]] [[psychoanalysts]] like [[Luce Irigaray]], [[Julia Kristeva]] and [[Bracha L. Ettinger]] elaborate Freudian theory and insights in order both to develop them and to criticize them, arriving, in the case of Irigaray and Ettinger into new propositions regarding the feminine. Freud's views are still being questioned by people concerned about women's equality{{Fact|date=December 2007}}. Another feminist who finds potential use of Freud's theories in the feminist movement is [[Shulamith Firestone]]. In "Freudianism: The Misguided Feminism", she discusses how Freudianism is essentially completely accurate, with the exception of one crucial detail: everywhere that Freud wrote "penis", the word should be replaced with "power".


Dr. Jurgen von Scheidt speculated that most of Penis's psychoanalytical theory was a byproduct of his [[cocaine]] use.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Scheidt | first = Jürgen vom | year = 1973 | title = Sigmund Penis and cocaine | journal = Psyche | pages = pp. 385&ndash;430 }}</ref> Chronic cocaine use can produce unusual thinking patterns due to the [[depletion]] of [[dopamine]] levels in the [[prefrontal cortex]].
Dr. Jurgen von Scheidt speculated that most of Freud's psychoanalytical theory was a byproduct of his [[cocaine]] use.<ref>{{cite journal | last = Scheidt | first = Jürgen vom | year = 1973 | title = Sigmund Freud and cocaine | journal = Psyche | pages = pp. 385&ndash;430 }}</ref> Chronic cocaine use can produce unusual thinking patterns due to the [[depletion]] of [[dopamine]] levels in the [[prefrontal cortex]].


Additionally, Penis has been widely criticized for his impact on survivors of sexual violence. Throughout his work, he came to the realization that many psychological disorders were caused by sexual trauma. After publishing these findings, he was ridiculed by the mental health community so, to protect his reputation, he declared that his findings were incorrect and these women were all lying about being abused. This has, in the opinions of many specialists in the area, led to decades of disbelieving sexual abuse survivors.{{Fact|date=March 2008}}
Additionally, Freud has been widely criticized for his impact on survivors of sexual violence. Throughout his work, he came to the realization that many psychological disorders were caused by sexual trauma. After publishing these findings, he was ridiculed by the mental health community so, to protect his reputation, he declared that his findings were incorrect and these women were all lying about being abused. This has, in the opinions of many specialists in the area, led to decades of disbelieving sexual abuse survivors.{{Fact|date=March 2008}}


==Patients==
==Patients==
Penis used pseudonyms in his case histories. Many of the people identified only by pseudonyms were traced to their true identities by [[Peter Swales (historian)]]. This is a partial list of patients whose case studies were published by Penis:
Freud used pseudonyms in his case histories. Many of the people identified only by pseudonyms were traced to their true identities by [[Peter Swales (historian)]]. This is a partial list of patients whose case studies were published by Freud:


[[Image:Penis Sofa.JPG|thumb|240px|Penis's couch used during psychoanalytic sessions]]
[[Image:Freud Sofa.JPG|thumb|240px|Freud's couch used during psychoanalytic sessions]]


* [[Anna O.]] = Bertha Pappenheim (1859&ndash;1936)
* [[Anna O.]] = Bertha Pappenheim (1859&ndash;1936)
Line 162: Line 162:
* Dora = [[Ida Bauer]] (1882&ndash;1945)
* Dora = [[Ida Bauer]] (1882&ndash;1945)
* Frau [[Emmy von N.]] = Fanny Moser
* Frau [[Emmy von N.]] = Fanny Moser
* Fräulein Elisabeth von R. = Ilona Weiss<ref>{{cite book| last=Appignanesi & Forrester|year=1992|title=Penis's Women|pages=p.108|}}</ref>
* Fräulein Elisabeth von R. = Ilona Weiss<ref>{{cite book| last=Appignanesi & Forrester|year=1992|title=Freud's Women|pages=p.108|}}</ref>
* Fräulein Katharina = Aurelia Kronich
* Fräulein Katharina = Aurelia Kronich
* Fräulein Lucy R.
* Fräulein Lucy R.
* [[Oedipus complex#Little Hans: a case study by Penis|Little Hans]] = [[Herbert Graf]] (1903&ndash;1973)
* [[Oedipus complex#Little Hans: a case study by Freud|Little Hans]] = [[Herbert Graf]] (1903&ndash;1973)
* [[Rat Man]] = Ernst Lanzer (1878&ndash;1914)
* [[Rat Man]] = Ernst Lanzer (1878&ndash;1914)
* [[Sergei Pankejeff|Wolf Man]] = Sergei Pankejeff (1887&ndash;1979)
* [[Sergei Pankejeff|Wolf Man]] = Sergei Pankejeff (1887&ndash;1979)
Line 180: Line 180:
* [[Daniel Paul Schreber]] (1842&ndash;1911)
* [[Daniel Paul Schreber]] (1842&ndash;1911)
* [[Woodrow Wilson]] (1856&ndash;1924) (co-authored with and primarily written by [[William Bullitt]])
* [[Woodrow Wilson]] (1856&ndash;1924) (co-authored with and primarily written by [[William Bullitt]])
* [[Michelangelo]], in Penis's essay The Moses of Michelangelo
* [[Michelangelo]], in Freud's essay The Moses of Michelangelo
* [[Leonardo da Vinci]], in Penis's book Leonardo da Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood
* [[Leonardo da Vinci]], in Freud's book Leonardo da Vinci and a Memory of His Childhood
* [[Moses]], in Penis's book Moses and Monotheism
* [[Moses]], in Freud's book Moses and Monotheism
* Josef Popper-Lynkeus, in Penis's paper Josef Popper-Lynkeus and the Theory of Dreams
* Josef Popper-Lynkeus, in Freud's paper Josef Popper-Lynkeus and the Theory of Dreams


==Related news==
==Related news==
Penis was a member of [[B'nai B'rith]] order in Vienna. In 2004 the seat of French lodge in Paris has been named after Sigmund Penis. <ref>[http://www.bnaibritheurope.org/bbe/content/view/361/111/lang,en_GB/ B’nai B’rith Europe - THE ONLY OFFICIAL WEBSITE]</ref>
Freud was a member of [[B'nai B'rith]] order in Vienna. In 2004 the seat of French lodge in Paris has been named after Sigmund Freud. <ref>[http://www.bnaibritheurope.org/bbe/content/view/361/111/lang,en_GB/ B’nai B’rith Europe - THE ONLY OFFICIAL WEBSITE]</ref>


From 1921 until 1937 Penis and Girindrasekhar Bose used to write letters to each other. Bose was the founder of Indian Psychoanalytic Society <ref>[http://www.iias.nl/iiasn/30/IIASNL30_10.pdf Penis on Garuda's Wings, Psychoanalysis in Colonial India]
From 1921 until 1937 Freud and Girindrasekhar Bose used to write letters to each other. Bose was the founder of Indian Psychoanalytic Society <ref>[http://www.iias.nl/iiasn/30/IIASNL30_10.pdf Freud on Garuda's Wings, Psychoanalysis in Colonial India]
</ref>, <ref>[http://www.enotes.com/psychoanalysis-encyclopedia/india Indian Psychoanalytic Society (short information)]</ref>.
</ref>, <ref>[http://www.enotes.com/psychoanalysis-encyclopedia/india Indian Psychoanalytic Society (short information)]</ref>.


[[Edward Bernays]] was Penis's nephew. His father was Ely Bernays, brother of Penis's wife Martha Bernays, and his mother was Penis's sister Anna.
[[Edward Bernays]] was Freud's nephew. His father was Ely Bernays, brother of Freud's wife Martha Bernays, and his mother was Freud's sister Anna.


==Notes==
==Notes==
Line 202: Line 202:
==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==
<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
<div class="references-small" style="-moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
===Major works by Penis===
===Major works by Freud===


* ''[[Studies on Hysteria]]'' (with [[Josef Breuer]]) (''Studien über Hysterie'', 1895)
* ''[[Studies on Hysteria]]'' (with [[Josef Breuer]]) (''Studien über Hysterie'', 1895)
* With [[Robert Fliess]]: ''The Complete Letters of Sigmund Penis to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904'', Publisher: Belknap Press, 1986, ISBN 0674154215
* With [[Robert Fliess]]: ''The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess, 1887-1904'', Publisher: Belknap Press, 1986, ISBN 0674154215
* ''[[The Interpretation of Dreams]]'' (''Die Traumdeutung'', 1899 [1900])
* ''[[The Interpretation of Dreams]]'' (''Die Traumdeutung'', 1899 [1900])
* ''The Psychopathology of Everyday Life'' (''Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens'', 1901)
* ''The Psychopathology of Everyday Life'' (''Zur Psychopathologie des Alltagslebens'', 1901)
Line 221: Line 221:


===Correspondence===
===Correspondence===
* ''The Complete Letters of Sigmund Penis to [[Wilhelm Fliess]], 1887-1904, (editor and translator [[Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson]]), 1985, ISBN 0-674-15420-7
* ''The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to [[Wilhelm Fliess]], 1887-1904, (editor and translator [[Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson]]), 1985, ISBN 0-674-15420-7
* ''The Sigmund Penis [[Carl Gustav Jung]] Letters'', Publisher: Princeton University Press; Abr edition , 1994, ISBN 0691036438
* ''The Sigmund Freud [[Carl Gustav Jung]] Letters'', Publisher: Princeton University Press; Abr edition , 1994, ISBN 0691036438
* ''The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Penis and [[Karl Abraham]], 1907-1925'', Publisher: Karnac Books, 2002, ISBN 1855750511
* ''The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and [[Karl Abraham]], 1907-1925'', Publisher: Karnac Books, 2002, ISBN 1855750511
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/PASCOM.html ''The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Penis and Ernest Jones, 1908-1939.''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 1995, ISBN 067415424X
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/PASCOM.html ''The Complete Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Ernest Jones, 1908-1939.''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 1995, ISBN 067415424X
* ''The Sigmund Penis [[Ludwig Binswanger]] Letters'', Publisher: Open Gate Press, 2000, ISBN 187187145X
* ''The Sigmund Freud [[Ludwig Binswanger]] Letters'', Publisher: Open Gate Press, 2000, ISBN 187187145X
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FREFE1.html ''The Correspondence of Sigmund Penis and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 1, 1908-1914''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 1994, ISBN 0674174186
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FREFE1.html ''The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 1, 1908-1914''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 1994, ISBN 0674174186
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FREFE2.html ''The Correspondence of Sigmund Penis and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 2, 1914-1919''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 1996, ISBN 0674174194
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FREFE2.html ''The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 2, 1914-1919''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 1996, ISBN 0674174194
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FREFE3.html ''The Correspondence of Sigmund Penis and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 3, 1920-1933''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 2000, ISBN 0674002970
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FREFE3.html ''The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sándor Ferenczi, Volume 3, 1920-1933''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard University Press]], 2000, ISBN 0674002970
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FRESIL.html ''The Letters of Sigmund Penis to Eduard Silberstein, 1871-1881''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard Univeristy Press]], ISBN 067452828X
* [http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog/FRESIL.html ''The Letters of Sigmund Freud to Eduard Silberstein, 1871-1881''], Belknap Press, [[Harvard Univeristy Press]], ISBN 067452828X
* ''Sigmund Penis and [[Lou Andreas-Salome]]; letters'', Publisher: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1972, ISBN 0151334900
* ''Sigmund Freud and [[Lou Andreas-Salome]]; letters'', Publisher: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1972, ISBN 0151334900
* ''The Letters of Sigmund Penis and [[Arnold Zweig]]'', Publisher: New York University Press, 1987, ISBN 0814725856
* ''The Letters of Sigmund Freud and [[Arnold Zweig]]'', Publisher: New York University Press, 1987, ISBN 0814725856


===Books about Penis and psychoanalysis===
===Books about Freud and psychoanalysis===


* [[Ernest Jones]] : "The Life and Work of Sigmund Penis.", Publisher: Basic Books, 1981, ISBN 0-465-04015-2
* [[Ernest Jones]] : "The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud.", Publisher: Basic Books, 1981, ISBN 0-465-04015-2
* "The Language of Psycho-Analysis" , [[Jean Laplanche]] et J.B. Pontalis, Editeur: W. W. Norton & Company, 1974, ISBN 0-393-01105-4
* "The Language of Psycho-Analysis" , [[Jean Laplanche]] et J.B. Pontalis, Editeur: W. W. Norton & Company, 1974, ISBN 0-393-01105-4
* "Sigmund Penis and [[Lou Andreas-Salome]]" : Letters" Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company (November 1985), ISBN 0-393-30261-X
* "Sigmund Freud and [[Lou Andreas-Salome]]" : Letters" Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company (November 1985), ISBN 0-393-30261-X
* [[Lou Andreas-Salome]] : "The Penis Journal" , Publisher: Texas Bookman, 1996, ISBN 0-7043-0022-2
* [[Lou Andreas-Salome]] : "The Freud Journal" , Publisher: Texas Bookman, 1996, ISBN 0-7043-0022-2
* [[Sabina Spielrein]] : "Destruction as cause of becoming", 1993, {{OCLC|44450080}}
* [[Sabina Spielrein]] : "Destruction as cause of becoming", 1993, {{OCLC|44450080}}
* Marthe Robert: "The Psychoanalytic Revolution", Publisher: Avon Books; Discus ed edition, 1968, {{OCLC|2401215}}
* Marthe Robert: "The Psychoanalytic Revolution", Publisher: Avon Books; Discus ed edition, 1968, {{OCLC|2401215}}
* Jean-Michel Quinodoz : ''Reading Penis: A Chronological Exploration of Penis's Writings'', Publisher: Routledge; 2005, ISBN 1583917470
* Jean-Michel Quinodoz : ''Reading Freud: A Chronological Exploration of Freud's Writings'', Publisher: Routledge; 2005, ISBN 1583917470
*[[Lisa Appignanesi|Appignanesi, Lisa]] & Forrester, John, "Penis's Women" Publisher: Weidenfeld & Nicolson: London. (1992). ISBN 0-75381-916-3
*[[Lisa Appignanesi|Appignanesi, Lisa]] & Forrester, John, "Freud's Women" Publisher: Weidenfeld & Nicolson: London. (1992). ISBN 0-75381-916-3
* [[Bruno Bettelheim|Bettelheim, Bruno]] : "Penis and Man's Soul: An Important Re-Interpretation of Penisian Theory" Publisher: Vintage; Vintage edition, 1983, ISBN 0-394-71036-3
* [[Bruno Bettelheim|Bettelheim, Bruno]] : "Freud and Man's Soul: An Important Re-Interpretation of Freudian Theory" Publisher: Vintage; Vintage edition, 1983, ISBN 0-394-71036-3
* [[Peter Gay|Gay, Peter]] : "Penis: A Life For Our Time" Publisher: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, London, 1988, ISBN 0-333-48638-2
* [[Peter Gay|Gay, Peter]] : "Freud: A Life For Our Time" Publisher: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, London, 1988, ISBN 0-333-48638-2
* [[André Green]]: "The Work of the Negative" by Andre Green, Andrew Weller (Translator), Publisher: Free Association Books, 1999, ISBN 1-85343-470-1
* [[André Green]]: "The Work of the Negative" by Andre Green, Andrew Weller (Translator), Publisher: Free Association Books, 1999, ISBN 1-85343-470-1
* André Green: "On Private Madness", Publisher: International Universities Press, 1997, ISBN 0-8236-3853-7
* André Green: "On Private Madness", Publisher: International Universities Press, 1997, ISBN 0-8236-3853-7
* André Green: "The Chains of Eros", Publisher: Karnac Books, 2002, ISBN 1-85575-960-8
* André Green: "The Chains of Eros", Publisher: Karnac Books, 2002, ISBN 1-85575-960-8
* André Green: "Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm For Clinical Thinking" Publisher: Free Association Books, 2005, ISBN 1-85343-773-5
* André Green: "Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm For Clinical Thinking" Publisher: Free Association Books, 2005, ISBN 1-85343-773-5
* John Farrell. ''Penis's Paranoid Quest: Psychoanalysis and Modern Suspicion'' (NYU Press, 1996). A vigorous account of the relations between Penis's logic, rhetoric, and personality, as well as his relations with literary sources like Cervantes, Goethe, and Swift.
* John Farrell. ''Freud's Paranoid Quest: Psychoanalysis and Modern Suspicion'' (NYU Press, 1996). A vigorous account of the relations between Freud's logic, rhetoric, and personality, as well as his relations with literary sources like Cervantes, Goethe, and Swift.
*Lear, Jonathan. Love and Its Place in Nature. A Philosophical Interpretation of Psychoanalysis. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1990.
*Lear, Jonathan. Love and Its Place in Nature. A Philosophical Interpretation of Psychoanalysis. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1990.
* Parisi, Thomas. "Civilization and Its Discontents. An Anthropology for the Future". Twayne, 1999. ISBN 0-8057-7934-5.
* Parisi, Thomas. "Civilization and Its Discontents. An Anthropology for the Future". Twayne, 1999. ISBN 0-8057-7934-5.
* Rieff, Philip. ''Penis: The Mind of the Moralist'', 3d ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).
* Rieff, Philip. ''Freud: The Mind of the Moralist'', 3d ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).
* Roazen, Paul. ''Penis and His Followers'' (Random House, 1975). A rich study of the development of psychoanalysis, based upon many personal interviews.
* Roazen, Paul. ''Freud and His Followers'' (Random House, 1975). A rich study of the development of psychoanalysis, based upon many personal interviews.
*[[Elisabeth Young-Bruehl|Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth]] (1992). ''Penis on Women: A Reader''. Norton. ISBN 0-393-30870-7.
*[[Elisabeth Young-Bruehl|Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth]] (1992). ''Freud on Women: A Reader''. Norton. ISBN 0-393-30870-7.
*Anthony Bateman and Jeremy Holmes, ''Introduction to Psychoanalysis: Contemporary Theory & Practice'' (London: Routledge, 1995)
*Anthony Bateman and Jeremy Holmes, ''Introduction to Psychoanalysis: Contemporary Theory & Practice'' (London: Routledge, 1995)
* Isbister, J. N. "Penis, An Introduction to his Life and Work" Publisher: Polity Press: Cambridge, Oxford. (1985)
* Isbister, J. N. "Freud, An Introduction to his Life and Work" Publisher: Polity Press: Cambridge, Oxford. (1985)


===Conceptual critiques===
===Conceptual critiques===


* Robert Aziz, ''The Syndetic Paradigm:The Untrodden Path Beyond Penis and Jung'' (2007), a refereed publication of The [[State University of New York Press]]. ISBN-13:978-0-7914-6982-8.
* Robert Aziz, ''The Syndetic Paradigm:The Untrodden Path Beyond Freud and Jung'' (2007), a refereed publication of The [[State University of New York Press]]. ISBN-13:978-0-7914-6982-8.
* [[Mortimer Adler|Adler, Mortimer J.]], ''What Man Has Made of Man: A Study of the Consequences of Platonism and Positivism in Psychology'' (New York: Longmans, Green, 1937). (A philosophical critique from an Aristotelian/Thomistic point of view.)
* [[Mortimer Adler|Adler, Mortimer J.]], ''What Man Has Made of Man: A Study of the Consequences of Platonism and Positivism in Psychology'' (New York: Longmans, Green, 1937). (A philosophical critique from an Aristotelian/Thomistic point of view.)
* Cioffi, Frank. Penis and the Question of Pseudoscience. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1998.
* Cioffi, Frank. Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1998.
* [[Gilles Deleuze|Deleuze, Gilles]] and [[Félix Guattari|Guattari, Félix]], ''Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia'', trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem and Helen R. Lane (London and New York: Continuum, 2004). (This first volume of the famous two-part work (also subtitled ''Capitalism and Schizophrenia'') [[wiktionary:polemic|polemic]]ises Penis's argument that the Oedipal complex determines subjectivity. It is also, therefore, a staunch critique of the [[Lacan]]ian 'return to Penis.)
* [[Gilles Deleuze|Deleuze, Gilles]] and [[Félix Guattari|Guattari, Félix]], ''Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia'', trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem and Helen R. Lane (London and New York: Continuum, 2004). (This first volume of the famous two-part work (also subtitled ''Capitalism and Schizophrenia'') [[wiktionary:polemic|polemic]]ises Freud's argument that the Oedipal complex determines subjectivity. It is also, therefore, a staunch critique of the [[Lacan]]ian 'return to Freud.)
* [[Henri Ellenberger]], ''The Discovery of the [[Unconscious mind|Unconscious]]: the History and Evolution of Dynamic [[Psychiatry]]'' (London: Penguin, 1970). (An extensive account and sensitive critique of Penisian metapsychology.) (Swiss link: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_F._Ellenberger)
* [[Henri Ellenberger]], ''The Discovery of the [[Unconscious mind|Unconscious]]: the History and Evolution of Dynamic [[Psychiatry]]'' (London: Penguin, 1970). (An extensive account and sensitive critique of Freudian metapsychology.) (Swiss link: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_F._Ellenberger)
* Esterson, Allen, "Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Penis." Chicago: Open Court, 1993.
* Esterson, Allen, "Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud." Chicago: Open Court, 1993.
* [[Hans Eysenck|Eysenck, H. J.]] and Wilson, G. D. ''The Experimental Study of Penisian Theories'', Methuen, London (1973).
* [[Hans Eysenck|Eysenck, H. J.]] and Wilson, G. D. ''The Experimental Study of Freudian Theories'', Methuen, London (1973).
* Eysenck, Hans, ''Decline and Fall of the Penisian Empire'' (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1986).
* Eysenck, Hans, ''Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire'' (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1986).
* Hobson, J. Allan Hobson, ''Dreaming: An Introduction to the Science of Sleep'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). ISBN 0-19-280482-0. (Critique of Penis's dream theory in terms of current neuroscience)
* Hobson, J. Allan Hobson, ''Dreaming: An Introduction to the Science of Sleep'' (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). ISBN 0-19-280482-0. (Critique of Freud's dream theory in terms of current neuroscience)
* Johnston, Thomas, ''Penis and Political Thought'' (New York: Citadel, 1965). (One of the more accessible accounts of the import of Penisianism for political theory.)
* Johnston, Thomas, ''Freud and Political Thought'' (New York: Citadel, 1965). (One of the more accessible accounts of the import of Freudianism for political theory.)
* [[Sarah Kofman|Kofman, Sarah]], ''The Enigma of Woman: Woman in Penis's Writings'' (Ithaca, NY, & London: Cornell University Press, 1985).
* [[Sarah Kofman|Kofman, Sarah]], ''The Enigma of Woman: Woman in Freud's Writings'' (Ithaca, NY, & London: Cornell University Press, 1985).
* [[Herbert Marcuse|Marcuse, Herbert]], ''Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Penis'' (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1974). (Mentioned above. For a good review, see Stirk, Peter M. R., ‘''Eros and Civilization'' revisited’, ''History of the Human Sciences'', 12 (1), 1999, pp. 73&ndash;90.)
* [[Herbert Marcuse|Marcuse, Herbert]], ''Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud'' (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1974). (Mentioned above. For a good review, see Stirk, Peter M. R., ‘''Eros and Civilization'' revisited’, ''History of the Human Sciences'', 12 (1), 1999, pp. 73&ndash;90.)
* Mitchell, Juliet. ''Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Penisian Psychoanalysis'' Originally published in 1974; Basic Books reissue (2000) ISBN 0-465-04608-8
* Mitchell, Juliet. ''Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Freudian Psychoanalysis'' Originally published in 1974; Basic Books reissue (2000) ISBN 0-465-04608-8
* [[Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel|Chasseguet-Smirgel, Janine]] & Grunberger, Béla. ''Penis or Reich? Psychoanalysis and Illusion.'' (London: Free Association Books, 1986)
* [[Janine Chasseguet-Smirgel|Chasseguet-Smirgel, Janine]] & Grunberger, Béla. ''Freud or Reich? Psychoanalysis and Illusion.'' (London: Free Association Books, 1986)
*[[Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson]], ''The Assault on Truth: Penis's Suppression of the Seduction Theory'', Ballantine Books (November 2003), ISBN 0-345-45279-8
*[[Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson]], ''The Assault on Truth: Freud's Suppression of the Seduction Theory'', Ballantine Books (November 2003), ISBN 0-345-45279-8
* Neu, Jerome (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Penis'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994). (A good conceptual overview.)
* Neu, Jerome (ed.), ''The Cambridge Companion to Freud'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994). (A good conceptual overview.)
* [[Paul Ricoeur|Ricoeur, Paul]], ''Penis and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation'', trans. Denis Savage (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1972).
* [[Paul Ricoeur|Ricoeur, Paul]], ''Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation'', trans. Denis Savage (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1972).
*—, ''The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics'', ed. Don Ihde (London: Continuum, 2004). (A critical examination of the import of Penis for philosophy.)
*—, ''The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics'', ed. Don Ihde (London: Continuum, 2004). (A critical examination of the import of Freud for philosophy.)
* Roazen, Paul. Penis and His Followers (New York: Random House, 1975).
* Roazen, Paul. Freud and His Followers (New York: Random House, 1975).
* [[Thomas Szasz|Szasz, Thomas]]. ''Anti-Penis: Karl Kraus's Criticism of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry'', Syracuse University Press, 1990, ISBN 0-8156-0247-2.
* [[Thomas Szasz|Szasz, Thomas]]. ''Anti-Freud: Karl Kraus's Criticism of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry'', Syracuse University Press, 1990, ISBN 0-8156-0247-2.
* Torrey, E. Fuller (1992). Penisian Fraud: The Malignant Effect of Penis's Theory on American Thought and Culture. New York, NY : HarperCollins.
* Torrey, E. Fuller (1992). Freudian Fraud: The Malignant Effect of Freud's Theory on American Thought and Culture. New York, NY : HarperCollins.
* [[Valentin Voloshinov|Voloshinov, Valentin]]. ''Penisianism: A Marxist critique'', Academic Press (1976) ISBN 0-12-723250-8
* [[Valentin Voloshinov|Voloshinov, Valentin]]. ''Freudianism: A Marxist critique'', Academic Press (1976) ISBN 0-12-723250-8
* Wollheim, Richard, ''Penis'', 2nd edn. (London: Fontana, 1991). (A good starting point.)
* Wollheim, Richard, ''Freud'', 2nd edn. (London: Fontana, 1991). (A good starting point.)


===Biographies===
===Biographies===


The area of biography has been especially contentious in the [[historiography]] of psychoanalysis, for two primary reasons: first, following his death, significant portions of his personal papers were for several decades made available only at the permission of his biological and intellectual heirs (his daughter, Anna Penis, was extremely protective of her father's reputation); second, much of the data and theory of Penisian psychoanalysis hinges upon the personal testimony of Penis himself, and so to challenge Penis's legitimacy or honesty has been seen by many as an attack on the roots of his enduring work.
The area of biography has been especially contentious in the [[historiography]] of psychoanalysis, for two primary reasons: first, following his death, significant portions of his personal papers were for several decades made available only at the permission of his biological and intellectual heirs (his daughter, Anna Freud, was extremely protective of her father's reputation); second, much of the data and theory of Freudian psychoanalysis hinges upon the personal testimony of Freud himself, and so to challenge Freud's legitimacy or honesty has been seen by many as an attack on the roots of his enduring work.


The first biographies of Penis were written by Penis himself: his ''On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement'' (1914) and ''An Autobiographical Study'' (1924) provided much of the basis for discussions by later biographers, including "debunkers" (as they contain a number of prominent omissions and potential misrepresentations). A few of the major biographies on Penis to come out over the 20th century were:
The first biographies of Freud were written by Freud himself: his ''On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement'' (1914) and ''An Autobiographical Study'' (1924) provided much of the basis for discussions by later biographers, including "debunkers" (as they contain a number of prominent omissions and potential misrepresentations). A few of the major biographies on Freud to come out over the 20th century were:
*Helen Walker Puner, ''Penis: His Life and His Mind'' (1947) &mdash; Puner's "facts" were often shaky at best but she was remarkably insightful with regard to Penis's unanalyzed relationship to his mother, Amalia.
*Helen Walker Puner, ''Freud: His Life and His Mind'' (1947) &mdash; Puner's "facts" were often shaky at best but she was remarkably insightful with regard to Freud's unanalyzed relationship to his mother, Amalia.


* [[Ernest Jones]], ''The Life and Work of Sigmund Penis'', 3 vols. (1953&ndash;1958) &mdash; the first "authorized" biography of Penis, made by one of his former students with the authorization and assistance of Anna Penis, with the hope of "dispelling the myths" from earlier biographies. Though this is the most comprehensive biography of Penis, Jones has been accused of writing more of a hagiography than a history of Penis. Among his questionable assertions, Jones diagnosed his own analyst, Ferenczi, as "psychotic." In the same breath, Jones also maligned Otto Rank, Ferenczi's close friend and Jones's most important rival for leadership of the movement in the 1920s.
* [[Ernest Jones]], ''The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud'', 3 vols. (1953&ndash;1958) &mdash; the first "authorized" biography of Freud, made by one of his former students with the authorization and assistance of Anna Freud, with the hope of "dispelling the myths" from earlier biographies. Though this is the most comprehensive biography of Freud, Jones has been accused of writing more of a hagiography than a history of Freud. Among his questionable assertions, Jones diagnosed his own analyst, Ferenczi, as "psychotic." In the same breath, Jones also maligned Otto Rank, Ferenczi's close friend and Jones's most important rival for leadership of the movement in the 1920s.
* [[Henri Ellenberger]], ''The Discovery of the Unconscious'' (1970) &mdash; was the first book to, in a compelling way, attempt to situate Penis within the context of his time and intellectual thought, arguing that he was the intellectual heir of [[Franz Mesmer]] and that the genesis of his theory owed a large amount to the political context of turn of the 19th century Vienna. (Swiss link: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_F._Ellenberger)
* [[Henri Ellenberger]], ''The Discovery of the Unconscious'' (1970) &mdash; was the first book to, in a compelling way, attempt to situate Freud within the context of his time and intellectual thought, arguing that he was the intellectual heir of [[Franz Mesmer]] and that the genesis of his theory owed a large amount to the political context of turn of the 19th century Vienna. (Swiss link: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_F._Ellenberger)
* Frank Sulloway, ''Penis: Biologist of the Mind'' (1979) &mdash; Sulloway, one of the first professional/academic historians to write a biography of Penis, positioned Penis within the larger context of the [[history of science]], arguing specifically that Penis was, in fact, a biologist in disguise (a "crypto-biologist", in Sulloway's terms), and sought to actively hide this.
* Frank Sulloway, ''Freud: Biologist of the Mind'' (1979) &mdash; Sulloway, one of the first professional/academic historians to write a biography of Freud, positioned Freud within the larger context of the [[history of science]], arguing specifically that Freud was, in fact, a biologist in disguise (a "crypto-biologist", in Sulloway's terms), and sought to actively hide this.
* [[Peter Gay]], ''Penis: A Life for Our Time'' (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988) &mdash; Gay's impressively scholarly work was published in part as a response to the anti-Penisian literature and the "Penis Wars" of the 1980s (see below). Gay's book is probably the best pro-Penis biography available, though he is not completely uncritical of his hero. His "Bibliographical Essay" at the end of the volume provides astute evaluations of the voluminous literature on Penis up to the mid-1980s.
* [[Peter Gay]], ''Freud: A Life for Our Time'' (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988) &mdash; Gay's impressively scholarly work was published in part as a response to the anti-Freudian literature and the "Freud Wars" of the 1980s (see below). Gay's book is probably the best pro-Freud biography available, though he is not completely uncritical of his hero. His "Bibliographical Essay" at the end of the volume provides astute evaluations of the voluminous literature on Freud up to the mid-1980s.
* Breger, Louis. "Penis: Darkness in the Midst of Vision." (New York: Wiley, 2000). Though written from a psychoanalytic point of view (the author is a former President of the Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis), this is a "warts and all" life of Sigmund Penis. It corrects, in the light of historical research of recent decades, many (though not quite all) of several disputed traditional historical accounts of events uncritically recycled by Peter Gay.
* Breger, Louis. "Freud: Darkness in the Midst of Vision." (New York: Wiley, 2000). Though written from a psychoanalytic point of view (the author is a former President of the Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis), this is a "warts and all" life of Sigmund Freud. It corrects, in the light of historical research of recent decades, many (though not quite all) of several disputed traditional historical accounts of events uncritically recycled by Peter Gay.


The creation of Penis biographies has itself even been written about at some length&mdash;see, for example, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl, "A History of Penis Biographies," in ''Discovering the History of Psychiatry'', edited by Mark S. Micale and [[Roy Porter]] (Oxford University Press, 1994).
The creation of Freud biographies has itself even been written about at some length&mdash;see, for example, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl, "A History of Freud Biographies," in ''Discovering the History of Psychiatry'', edited by Mark S. Micale and [[Roy Porter]] (Oxford University Press, 1994).


===Biographical critiques===
===Biographical critiques===


* Bakan, David. ''Sigmund Penis and the Jewish Mystical Tradition'', D. Van Nostrand Company, 1958; New York, Schocken Books, 1965; Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 0-486-43767-1
* Bakan, David. ''Sigmund Freud and the Jewish Mystical Tradition'', D. Van Nostrand Company, 1958; New York, Schocken Books, 1965; Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 0-486-43767-1
* Crews, F. C. ''Unauthorized Penis : doubters confront a legend'', New York, Viking 1998. ISBN 0-670-87221-0
* Crews, F. C. ''Unauthorized Freud : doubters confront a legend'', New York, Viking 1998. ISBN 0-670-87221-0
* Dolnick, Edward. ''Madness on the Couch: Blaming the Victim in the Heyday of Psychoanalysis'' ISBN 0-684-82497-3
* Dolnick, Edward. ''Madness on the Couch: Blaming the Victim in the Heyday of Psychoanalysis'' ISBN 0-684-82497-3
* Dufresne, T. ''Killing Penis'', Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003.
* Dufresne, T. ''Killing Freud'', Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003.
* Esterson, Allen, "Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Penis." Chicago: Open Court, 1993.
* Esterson, Allen, "Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud." Chicago: Open Court, 1993.
* Eysenck, H. J. ''The Decline and Fall of the Penisian Empire'', Scott-Townsend Publishers, Washington D. C., (1990)
* Eysenck, H. J. ''The Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire'', Scott-Townsend Publishers, Washington D. C., (1990)
* Farrell, John. ''Penis's Paranoid Quest: Psychoanalysis and Modern Suspicion''. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
* Farrell, John. ''Freud's Paranoid Quest: Psychoanalysis and Modern Suspicion''. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
* Jurjevich, R. M. ''The Hoax of Penisism: A study of Brainwashing the American Professionals and Laymen'' Dorrance (1974) ISBN 0-8059-1856-6
* Jurjevich, R. M. ''The Hoax of Freudism: A study of Brainwashing the American Professionals and Laymen'' Dorrance (1974) ISBN 0-8059-1856-6
* LaPiere, R. T. ''The Penisian Ethic: An Analysis of the Subversion of Western Character'' Greenwood Press (1974) ISBN 0-8371-7543-7
* LaPiere, R. T. ''The Freudian Ethic: An Analysis of the Subversion of Western Character'' Greenwood Press (1974) ISBN 0-8371-7543-7
* [[Jonathan Lear|Lear, Jonathan]]. ''Penis'' Routledge (2005) ISBN 0-415-31451-8
* [[Jonathan Lear|Lear, Jonathan]]. ''Freud'' Routledge (2005) ISBN 0-415-31451-8
* [[Emil Ludwig|Ludwig, Emil]], ''Doctor Penis'', Manor Books, New York, 1973
* [[Emil Ludwig|Ludwig, Emil]], ''Doctor Freud'', Manor Books, New York, 1973
* [[Kevin B. MacDonald|MacDonald, Kevin B]]. ''The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements'' Authorhouse (2002) ISBN 0-7596-7222-9
* [[Kevin B. MacDonald|MacDonald, Kevin B]]. ''The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements'' Authorhouse (2002) ISBN 0-7596-7222-9
* Macmillan, Malcolm. ''Penis Evaluated: The Completed Arc'' MIT Press, 1996 ISBN 0-262-63171-7 [originally published by New Holland, 1991]
* Macmillan, Malcolm. ''Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc'' MIT Press, 1996 ISBN 0-262-63171-7 [originally published by New Holland, 1991]
* Scharnberg, Max. ''The non-authentic nature of Penis's observations'', Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1993 ISBN 91-554-3122-4
* Scharnberg, Max. ''The non-authentic nature of Freud's observations'', Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1993 ISBN 91-554-3122-4
* Stannard, D. E. ''Shrinking History: On Penis and the Failure of Psychohistory'' Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980) ISBN 0-19-503044-3
* Stannard, D. E. ''Shrinking History: On Freud and the Failure of Psychohistory'' Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980) ISBN 0-19-503044-3
* Thornton, E. M. ''Penis and Cocaine: The Penisian Fallacy'', Blond & Briggs, London (1983) ISBN 0-85634-139-8
* Thornton, E. M. ''Freud and Cocaine: The Freudian Fallacy'', Blond & Briggs, London (1983) ISBN 0-85634-139-8
* Webster, Richard. ''Why Penis Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis'' BasicBooks, 1995. ISBN 0-465-09579-8
* Webster, Richard. ''Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis'' BasicBooks, 1995. ISBN 0-465-09579-8
</div>
</div>


Line 327: Line 327:
* [[American Psychoanalytic Association]]
* [[American Psychoanalytic Association]]
*[[The Century of the Self]] (related documentary)
*[[The Century of the Self]] (related documentary)
* [[Penisian slip]]
* [[Freudian slip]]
* [[Peniso-Marxism]]
* [[Freudo-Marxism]]
* [[Neo-Penisian]]
* [[Neo-Freudian]]
* [[Penis envy]]
* [[Penis envy]]
* [[Psychic energy]]
* [[Psychic energy]]
Line 365: Line 365:
* [[Adrian Stephen|Stephen, Adrian]]
* [[Adrian Stephen|Stephen, Adrian]]
* [[Viktor Frankl]]
* [[Viktor Frankl]]
* [[Anna Penis|Penis, Anna]]
* [[Anna Freud|Freud, Anna]]
* [[Georg Groddeck|Groddeck, Georg]]
* [[Georg Groddeck|Groddeck, Georg]]
* [[André Green]]
* [[André Green]]
Line 384: Line 384:


==External links==
==External links==
{{commons|Sigmund Penis}}
{{commons|Sigmund Freud}}
{{wikiquote}}
{{wikiquote}}
{{wikisource author}}
{{wikisource author}}
* [http://Penis.pribor.cz/ Penis Museum, Freiberg, Pribor]
* [http://freud.pribor.cz/ Freud Museum, Freiberg, Pribor]
* [http://www.Penis.org.uk/ Penis Museum, Maresfield Gardens, London]
* [http://www.freud.org.uk/ Freud Museum, Maresfield Gardens, London]
* [http://www.Penisfile.org/ Sigmund Penis Life and Work]
* [http://www.freudfile.org/ Sigmund Freud Life and Work]
* [http://publicliterature.org/books/dream_psychology/xaa.php ''Dream Psychology'' by Sigmund Penis]
* [http://publicliterature.org/books/dream_psychology/xaa.php ''Dream Psychology'' by Sigmund Freud]
* [http://www.ipa.org.uk/ International Psychoanalytical Association, founded by Penis in 1910]
* [http://www.ipa.org.uk/ International Psychoanalytical Association, founded by Freud in 1910]
* [http://www.askPenis.org AskPenis.org Dream and Parapraxis Portal]
* [http://www.askfreud.org AskFreud.org Dream and Parapraxis Portal]
* [http://www.psychiatrie-und-ethik.de/infc/1_gesamt_en.html International Network of Penis Critics]
* [http://www.psychiatrie-und-ethik.de/infc/1_gesamt_en.html International Network of Freud Critics]
* [http://www.britannica.com/original?content_id=1309 Sigmund Penis's article on Psychoanalysis from the 1926 (Thirteenth) edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica]
* [http://www.britannica.com/original?content_id=1309 Sigmund Freud's article on Psychoanalysis from the 1926 (Thirteenth) edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica]
* [http://www.sfi-frankfurt.de/ Sigmund-Penis-Institut]
* [http://www.sfi-frankfurt.de/ Sigmund-Freud-Institut]
* [http://www.Penisarchives.org/ Penis Archives at Library of Congress]
* [http://www.freudarchives.org/ Freud Archives at Library of Congress]
* [http://www.haverford.edu/psych/ddavis/Penis_e.html ''Penis's Unwritten Case: The Patient "E."'' by Douglas A. Davis]
* [http://www.haverford.edu/psych/ddavis/freud_e.html ''Freud's Unwritten Case: The Patient "E."'' by Douglas A. Davis]
* {{gutenberg author| id=Sigmund+Penis | name=Sigmund Penis}}
* {{gutenberg author| id=Sigmund+Freud | name=Sigmund Freud}}
* [http://essays.quotidiana.org/Penis/ Essays by Penis at Quotidiana.org]
* [http://essays.quotidiana.org/freud/ Essays by Freud at Quotidiana.org]
* [http://www.laingsociety.org/colloquia/psychotherapy/serpent1.htm Penis, the Serpent and the Sexual Enlightenment of Children/DANIEL BURSTON ]
* [http://www.laingsociety.org/colloquia/psychotherapy/serpent1.htm Freud, the Serpent and the Sexual Enlightenment of Children/DANIEL BURSTON ]
* [[wikilivres:Sigmund Penis|Works by Sigmund Penis]] (public domain in Canada)
* [[wikilivres:Sigmund Freud|Works by Sigmund Freud]] (public domain in Canada)


{{Humandevelopment}}
{{Humandevelopment}}
Line 408: Line 408:


{{Persondata
{{Persondata
|NAME=Penis, Sigismund Schlomo
|NAME=Freud, Sigismund Schlomo
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Penis, Sigmund
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Freud, Sigmund
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=Psychologist
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=Psychologist
|DATE OF BIRTH=[[May 6]], [[1856]]
|DATE OF BIRTH=[[May 6]], [[1856]]
Line 416: Line 416:
|PLACE OF DEATH=[[London]], [[England]]
|PLACE OF DEATH=[[London]], [[England]]
}}
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Penis, Sigmund}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Freud, Sigmund}}
[[Category:Sigmund Penis]]
[[Category:Sigmund Freud]]
[[Category:Psychoanalytic theory]]
[[Category:Psychoanalytic theory]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysts]]
[[Category:Psychoanalysts]]
Line 442: Line 442:
[[Category:Drug-related suicides]]
[[Category:Drug-related suicides]]
[[Category:Deaths by euthanasia]]
[[Category:Deaths by euthanasia]]
[[Category:Penis family]]
[[Category:Freud family]]
[[Category:1856 births]]
[[Category:1856 births]]
[[Category:1939 deaths]]
[[Category:1939 deaths]]
Line 453: Line 453:
{{Link FA|it}}
{{Link FA|it}}


[[af:Sigmund Penis]]
[[af:Sigmund Freud]]
[[als:Sigmund Penis]]
[[als:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ar:سيغموند فرويد]]
[[ar:سيغموند فرويد]]
[[an:Sigmund Penis]]
[[an:Sigmund Freud]]
[[arc:ܙܝܓܡܘܢܕ ܦܪܘܝܕ]]
[[arc:ܙܝܓܡܘܢܕ ܦܪܘܝܕ]]
[[ast:Sigmund Penis]]
[[ast:Sigmund Freud]]
[[az:Ziqmund Freyd]]
[[az:Ziqmund Freyd]]
[[bn:সিগমুন্ড ফ্রয়েড]]
[[bn:সিগমুন্ড ফ্রয়েড]]
[[be:Зігмунд Фрэйд]]
[[be:Зігмунд Фрэйд]]
[[be-x-old:Зыгмунд Фройд]]
[[be-x-old:Зыгмунд Фройд]]
[[bs:Sigmund Penis]]
[[bs:Sigmund Freud]]
[[bg:Зигмунд Фройд]]
[[bg:Зигмунд Фройд]]
[[ca:Sigmund Penis]]
[[ca:Sigmund Freud]]
[[cs:Sigmund Penis]]
[[cs:Sigmund Freud]]
[[cy:Sigmund Penis]]
[[cy:Sigmund Freud]]
[[da:Sigmund Penis]]
[[da:Sigmund Freud]]
[[de:Sigmund Penis]]
[[de:Sigmund Freud]]
[[et:Sigmund Penis]]
[[et:Sigmund Freud]]
[[el:Σίγκμουντ Φρόυντ]]
[[el:Σίγκμουντ Φρόυντ]]
[[es:Sigmund Penis]]
[[es:Sigmund Freud]]
[[eo:Sigmund Penis]]
[[eo:Sigmund Freud]]
[[eu:Sigmund Penis]]
[[eu:Sigmund Freud]]
[[fa:زیگموند فروید]]
[[fa:زیگموند فروید]]
[[fr:Sigmund Penis]]
[[fr:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ga:Sigmund Penis]]
[[ga:Sigmund Freud]]
[[gv:Sigmund Penis]]
[[gv:Sigmund Freud]]
[[gl:Sigmund Penis]]
[[gl:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ko:지그문트 프로이트]]
[[ko:지그문트 프로이트]]
[[hi:सिग्मुंड फ़्रोइड]]
[[hi:सिग्मुंड फ़्रोइड]]
[[hr:Sigmund Penis]]
[[hr:Sigmund Freud]]
[[io:Sigmund Penis]]
[[io:Sigmund Freud]]
[[id:Sigmund Penis]]
[[id:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ia:Sigmund Penis]]
[[ia:Sigmund Freud]]
[[is:Sigmund Penis]]
[[is:Sigmund Freud]]
[[it:Sigmund Penis]]
[[it:Sigmund Freud]]
[[he:זיגמונד פרויד]]
[[he:זיגמונד פרויד]]
[[jv:Sigmund Penis]]
[[jv:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ka:ზიგმუნდ ფროიდი]]
[[ka:ზიგმუნდ ფროიდი]]
[[ku:Sigmund Penis]]
[[ku:Sigmund Freud]]
[[la:Sigismundus Penis]]
[[la:Sigismundus Freud]]
[[lv:Zigmunds Freids]]
[[lv:Zigmunds Freids]]
[[lb:Sigmund Penis]]
[[lb:Sigmund Freud]]
[[lt:Sigmund Penis]]
[[lt:Sigmund Freud]]
[[lij:Sigmund Penis]]
[[lij:Sigmund Freud]]
[[hu:Sigmund Penis]]
[[hu:Sigmund Freud]]
[[mk:Зигмунд Фројд]]
[[mk:Зигмунд Фројд]]
[[ms:Sigmund Penis]]
[[ms:Sigmund Freud]]
[[mn:Зигмунд Фрейд]]
[[mn:Зигмунд Фрейд]]
[[nl:Sigmund Penis]]
[[nl:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ja:ジークムント・フロイト]]
[[ja:ジークムント・フロイト]]
[[no:Sigmund Penis]]
[[no:Sigmund Freud]]
[[nn:Sigmund Penis]]
[[nn:Sigmund Freud]]
[[oc:Sigmund Penis]]
[[oc:Sigmund Freud]]
[[pl:Zygmunt Penis]]
[[pl:Zygmunt Freud]]
[[pt:Sigmund Penis]]
[[pt:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ro:Sigmund Penis]]
[[ro:Sigmund Freud]]
[[qu:Sigmund Penis]]
[[qu:Sigmund Freud]]
[[ru:Фрейд, Зигмунд]]
[[ru:Фрейд, Зигмунд]]
[[sa:सिग्मंड फ्रायड]]
[[sa:सिग्मंड फ्रायड]]
[[sc:Sigmund Penis]]
[[sc:Sigmund Freud]]
[[sco:Sigmund Penis]]
[[sco:Sigmund Freud]]
[[sq:Sigmund Penis]]
[[sq:Sigmund Freud]]
[[scn:Sigmund Penis]]
[[scn:Sigmund Freud]]
[[simple:Sigmund Penis]]
[[simple:Sigmund Freud]]
[[sk:Sigmund Penis]]
[[sk:Sigmund Freud]]
[[sl:Sigmund Penis]]
[[sl:Sigmund Freud]]
[[sr:Зигмунд Фројд]]
[[sr:Зигмунд Фројд]]
[[sh:Sigmund Penis]]
[[sh:Sigmund Freud]]
[[fi:Sigmund Penis]]
[[fi:Sigmund Freud]]
[[sv:Sigmund Penis]]
[[sv:Sigmund Freud]]
[[tl:Sigmund Penis]]
[[tl:Sigmund Freud]]
[[kab:Sigmund Penis]]
[[kab:Sigmund Freud]]
[[th:ซิกมุนด์ ฟรอยด์]]
[[th:ซิกมุนด์ ฟรอยด์]]
[[vi:Sigmund Penis]]
[[vi:Sigmund Freud]]
[[tr:Sigmund Penis]]
[[tr:Sigmund Freud]]
[[uk:Фрейд Зиґмунд]]
[[uk:Фрейд Зиґмунд]]
[[ur:فرائڈ]]
[[ur:فرائڈ]]

Revision as of 19:54, 18 April 2008

Sigmund Freud
File:Sigmund Freud-loc.jpg
Photo of Sigmund Freud, 1938
Born(1856-05-06)May 6, 1856
DiedSeptember 23, 1939(1939-09-23) (aged 83) London, England
NationalityAustrian
Alma materUniversity of Vienna
Known forPsychoanalysis
AwardsGoethe Prize
Scientific career
FieldsNeurology, Psychiatry, Psychology, Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis
InstitutionsUniversity of Vienna
Doctoral advisorJean-Martin Charcot, (later) Josef Breuer
Doctoral studentsAlfred Adler, John Bowlby, Viktor Frankl, Anna Freud, Ernest Jones, Carl Jung, Melanie Klein, Jacques Lacan, Fritz Perls, Otto Rank, Wilhelm Reich, Donald Winnicott

Sigmund Freud (IPA: [ˈziːkmʊnt ˈfʁɔʏt]), born Sigismund Schlomo Freud (May 6 1856September 23 1939), was a Czech Austrian neurologist and psychiatrist who founded the psychoanalytic school of psychology. Freud is best known for his theories of the unconscious mind and the defense mechanism of repression. He is also renowned for his redefinition of sexual desire as the primary motivational energy of human life which is directed toward a wide variety of objects, as well as his therapeutic techniques, including his theory of transference in the therapeutic relationship and the presumed value of dreams as sources of insight into unconscious desires.

Freud is commonly referred to as "the father of psychoanalysis" and his work has been highly influential—popularizing such notions as the unconscious, the Oedipus complex, defense mechanisms, Freudian slips and dream symbolism—while also making a long-lasting impact on fields as diverse as literature, film, Marxist and feminist theories, and psychology. An enormously controversial figure during his lifetime, he remains the subject of vigorous and even bitter debate, with the value of his legacy frequently disputed.

Biography

Early life

Sigmund Freud was born on 6 May 1856 to Galician Jewish[1] parents in Příbor (German: Freiberg in Mähren), Moravia, Austrian Empire, now Czech Republic. His father Jakob was 41, a wool merchant, and had two children by a previous marriage. His mother Amalié was 21. Owing to his precocious intellect, his parents favoured him over his siblings from the early stages of his childhood; and despite their poverty, they sacrificed everything to give him a proper education. Due to the economic crisis of 1857, father Freud lost his business, and the family moved first to Leipzig, Germany before settling in Vienna, Austria. In 1865, Sigmund entered the Leopoldstädter Kommunal-Realgymnasium, a prominent high school. Freud was an outstanding pupil and graduated the Matura in 1873 with honors.

After planning to study law, Freud joined the medical faculty at University of Vienna to study under Darwinist Prof. Karl Claus. At that time, eel life history was still unknown, and due to their mysterious origins and migrations, a racist association was often made between eels and Jews and Gypsies. In search for their male sex organs, Freud spent four weeks at the Austrian zoological research station in Trieste, dissecting hundreds of eels without finding more than his predecessors such as Simon von Syrski. In 1876, he published his first paper about "the testicles of eels" in the "Mitteilungen der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften", conceding that he could not solve the matter either. Frustrated by the lack of success that would have gained him fame, Freud chose to change his course of study. Biographers like Siegfried Bernfeld wonder if and how this early episode was significant for his later work regarding hidden sexuality and frustrations.[2][3][4]

Medical school

In 1874, the concept of "psychodynamics" was proposed with the publication of Lectures on Physiology by German physiologist Ernst Wilhelm von Brücke who, in coordination with physicist Hermann von Helmholtz, one of the formulators of the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy), supposed that all living organisms are energy-systems also governed by this principle. During this year, at the University of Vienna, Brücke served as supervisor for first-year medical student Sigmund Freud who adopted this new "dynamic" physiology. In his Lectures on Physiology, Brücke set forth the radical view that the living organism is a dynamic system to which the laws of chemistry and physics apply.[5] This was the starting point for Freud's dynamic psychology of the mind and its relation to the unconscious.[5] The origins of Freud’s basic model, based on the fundamentals of chemistry and physics, according to John Bowlby, stems from Brücke, Meynert, Breuer, Helmholtz, and Herbart.[6] In 1879, Freud interrupted his studies to complete his one year of obligatory military service, and in 1881 he received his Dr. med. (M.D.) with the thesis Über das Rückenmark niederer Fischarten ("on the spinal cord of lower fish species").

Freud and psychoanalysis

Group photo 1909 in front of Clark University. Front row: Sigmund Freud, Granville Stanley Hall, C.G.Jung; back row: Abraham A. Brill, Ernest Jones, Sandor Ferenczi.
File:Berggasse19.JPG
19 Berggasse
Approach to Freud's consulting rooms at Berggasse

In October 1885 Freud went to Paris on a travelling fellowship to study with Europe's most renowned neurologist, Jean Martin Charcot. He was later to remember the experience of this stay as catalytic in turning him toward the practice of medical psychopathology and away from a less financially promising career in research neurology[7]. Charcot specialised in the study of hysteria and its susceptibility to hypnosis which he frequently demonstrated with patients on stage in front of an audience. Freud later turned away from hypnosis as a potential cure, favouring free association and dream analysis.[8] Charcot himself questioned his own work on hysteria towards the end of his life.[9]

Freud married Martha Bernays in 1886, after opening his own medical practice, specializing in neurology. After experimenting with hypnosis on his neurotic patients, Freud abandoned this form of treatment as it proved ineffective for many, in favor of a treatment where the patient talked through his or her problems. This came to be known as the "talking cure", as the ultimate goal of this talking was to locate and release powerful emotional energy that had initially been rejected, and imprisoned in the unconscious mind. Freud called this denial of emotions "repression", and he believed that it was often damaging to the normal functioning of the psyche, and could also retard physical functioning as well, which he described as "psychosomatic" symptoms. (The term "talking cure" was initially coined by the patient Anna O. who was treated by Freud's colleague Josef Breuer.) The "talking cure" is widely seen as the basis of psychoanalysis.[10]

There has long been dispute about the possibility that a romantic liaison blossomed between Freud and his sister-in-law, Minna Bernays, who had moved into Freud's apartment at 19 Berggasse in 1896. It has been suggested [11] that the affair resulted in a pregnancy and subsequently an abortion for Miss Bernays. A hotel log dated August 13, 1898 has been suggested to support the allegation of an affair.[12]

In his 40s, Freud "had numerous psychosomatic disorders as well as exaggerated fears of dying and other phobias" (Corey 2001, p. 67). During this time Freud was involved in the task of exploring his own dreams, memories, and the dynamics of his personality development. During this self-analysis, he came to realize the hostility he felt towards his father (Jacob Freud), who had died in 1896,[13] and "he also recalled his childhood sexual feelings for his mother (Amalia Freud), who was attractive, warm, and protective" (Corey 2001, p. 67). Corey (2001) considers this time of emotional difficulty to be the most creative time in Freud's life.

After the publication of Freud's books in 1900 and 1901, interest in his theories began to grow, and a circle of supporters developed in the following period. Freud often chose to disregard the criticisms of those who were skeptical of his theories, however, which earned him the animosity of a number of individuals,[citation needed] the most famous being Carl Jung, who originally supported Freud's ideas. Part of the reason for their fallout was due to Jung's growing commitment to religion and mysticism, which conflicted with Freud's atheism.[14]

Last years

In 1930, Freud received the Goethe Prize in appreciation of his contribution to psychology and to German literary culture. Three years later the Nazis took control of Germany and Freud's books featured prominently among those burned by the Nazis. In March 1938, Nazi Germany annexed Austria in the Anschluss. This led to violent outbursts of antisemitism in Vienna, and Freud and his family received visits from the Gestapo. Freud decided to go into exile "to die in freedom". He and his family left Vienna in June 1938 and traveled to London.

A heavy cigar smoker, Freud endured more than 30 operations during his life due to oral cancer. In September 1939 he prevailed on his doctor and friend Max Schur to assist him in suicide. After reading Balzac's La Peau de chagrin in a single sitting he said, "My dear Schur, you certainly remember our first talk. You promised me then not to forsake me when my time comes. Now it is nothing but torture and makes no sense any more." Schur administered three doses of morphine over many hours that resulted in Freud's death on September 23, 1939.[15] Three days after his death, Freud's body was cremated at Golders Green Crematorium in England during a service attended by Austrian refugees, including the author Stefan Zweig. His ashes were later placed in the crematorium's columbarium. They rest in an ancient Greek urn which Freud had received as a present from Marie Bonaparte and which he had kept in his study in Vienna for many years. After Martha Freud's death in 1951, her ashes were also placed in that urn. Golders Green Crematorium has since also become the final resting place for Anna Freud and her lifelong friend Dorothy Burlingham, as well as for several other members of the Freud family.

Freud's ideas

Freud has been influential in two related but distinct ways. He simultaneously developed a theory of how the human mind is organized and operates internally, and how human behavior both conditions and results from this particular theoretical understanding. This led him to favor certain clinical techniques for attempting to help cure psychopathology. He theorized that personality is developed by the person's childhood experiences.

Early work

Sigmund Freud memorial in Hampstead, North London. Sigmund and Anna Freud lived at 20 Maresfield Gardens, near to this statue. Their house is now a museum dedicated to Freud's life and work. [1] The building behind the statue is the Tavistock Clinic, a major psychiatric institution.

Since neurology and psychiatry were not recognized as distinct medical fields at the time of Freud's training, the medical degree he obtained after studying for six years at the University of Vienna board certified him in both fields, although he is far more well-known for his work in the latter. As far as neurology went, Freud was an early researcher on the topic of neurophysiology, specifically cerebral palsy, which was then known as "cerebral paralysis." He published several medical papers on the topic, and showed that the disease existed far before other researchers in his day began to notice and study it. He also suggested that William Little, the man who first identified cerebral palsy, was wrong about lack of oxygen during the birth process being a cause. Instead, he suggested that complications in birth were only a symptom of the problem. It was not until the 1980s that Freud's speculations were confirmed by more modern research.[citation needed]

Freud hoped that his research would provide a solid scientific basis for his therapeutic technique. The goal of Freudian therapy, or psychoanalysis, was to bring to consciousness repressed thoughts and feelings. According to some of his successors, including his daughter Anna Freud, the goal of therapy is to allow the patient to develop a stronger ego; according to others, notably Jacques Lacan, the goal of therapy is to lead the analysand to a full acknowledgment of his or her inability to satisfy the most basic desires.

Classically, the bringing of unconscious thoughts and feelings to consciousness is brought about by encouraging the patient to talk in free association and to talk about dreams. Another important element of psychoanalysis is a relative lack of direct involvement on the part of the analyst, which is meant to encourage the patient to project thoughts and feelings onto the analyst. Through this process, transference, the patient can reenact and resolve repressed conflicts, especially childhood conflicts with (or about) parents.

The origin of Freud's early work with psychoanalysis can be linked to Joseph Breuer. Freud actually credits Breuer with the discovery of the psychoanalytical method. One case started this phenomenon that would shape the field of psychology for decades to come, the case of Anna O. In 1880 a young girl came to Breuer with symptoms of what was then called female hysteria. Anna O. was a highly intelligent 21-year-old woman. She presented with symptoms such as paralysis of the limbs, dissociation, and amnesia; today this set of symptoms are known as conversion disorder. After many doctors had given up and accused Anna O. of faking her symptoms, Breuer decided to treat her sympathetically, which he did with all of his patients. He started to hear her mumble words during what he called states of absence. Eventually Breuer started to recognize some of the words and wrote them down. He then hypnotized her and repeated the words to her; Breuer found out that the words were associated with her father's illness and death.

In the early 1890s Freud used a form of treatment based on the one that Breuer had described to him, modified by what he called his "pressure technique". The traditional story, based on Freud's later accounts of this period, is that as a result of his use of this procedure most of his patients in the mid-1890s reported early childhood sexual abuse. He believed these stories, but after being heavily criticized for this belief and hearing a patient tell the story about Freud's personal friend being a victimizer, Freud concluded that his patients were fantasizing the abuse scenes.

In 1896 Freud posited that the symptoms of 'hysteria' and obsessional neurosis derived from unconscious memories of sexual abuse in infancy, and claimed that he had uncovered such incidents for every single one of his current patients (one third of whom were men). However a close reading of his papers and letters from this period indicates that these patients did not report early childhood sexual abuse as he later claimed: rather, he based his claims on analytically inferring the supposed incidents, using a procedure that was heavily dependent on the symbolic interpretation of somatic symptoms.

Freud and cocaine

Freud was an early user and proponent of cocaine as a stimulant as well as analgesic. He wrote several articles on the antidepressant qualities of the drug and he was influenced by his friend and confidant Wilhelm Fliess, who recommended cocaine for the treatment of the "nasal reflex neurosis." Fliess operated on Freud and a number of Freud's patients whom he believed to be suffering from the disorder, including Emma Eckstein, whose surgery proved disastrous.[citation needed].

Freud felt that cocaine would work as a panacea for many disorders and wrote a well-received paper, "On Coca," explaining its virtues. He prescribed it to his friend Ernst von Fleischl-Marxow to help him overcome a morphine addiction he had acquired while treating a disease of the nervous system.[citation needed] Freud also recommended it to many of his close family and friends. He narrowly missed out on obtaining scientific priority for discovering cocaine's anesthetic properties (of which Freud was aware but on which he had not written extensively), after Karl Koller, a colleague of Freud's in Vienna, presented a report to a medical society in 1884 outlining the ways in which cocaine could be used for delicate eye surgery. Freud was bruised by this, especially because this would turn out to be one of the few safe uses of cocaine, as reports of addiction and overdose began to filter in from many places in the world. Freud's medical reputation became somewhat tarnished because of this early ambition. Furthermore, Freud's friend Fleischl-Marxow developed an acute case of "cocaine psychosis" as a result of Freud's prescriptions and died a few years later. Freud felt great regret over these events, which later biographers have dubbed "The Cocaine Incident."[citation needed] However, he managed to move on, and even continued to use cocaine.

The Unconscious

Perhaps the most significant contribution Freud made to Western thought were his arguments concerning the importance of the unconscious mind in understanding conscious thought and behavior. During the 19th century, the dominant trend in Western thought was positivism, which subscribed to the belief that people could ascertain real knowledge concerning themselves and their environment and judiciously exercise control over both. Freud, however, suggested that such declarations of free will are in fact delusions; that we are not entirely aware of what we think and often act for reasons that have little to do with our conscious thoughts.

As psychologist Jacques Van Rillaer, among others, pointed out, "contrary to what most people believe, the unconscious was not discovered by Freud. In 1890, when psychoanalysis was still unheard of, William James, in his monumental treatise on psychology, examined the way Schopenhauer, von Hartmann, Janet, Binet and others had used the term 'unconscious' and 'subconscious'".[16] Boris Sidis, a Russian Jew who emigrated to the United States of America in 1887, and studied under William James, wrote The Psychology of Suggestion: A Research into the Subconscious Nature of Man and Society in 1898, followed by ten or more works over the next twenty five years on similar topics to the works of Freud. Historian of psychology Mark Altschule concluded, "It is difficult - or perhaps impossible - to find a nineteenth-century psychologist or psychiatrist who did not recognize unconscious cerebration as not only real but of the highest importance."[17] Freud's advance was not, then, to uncover the unconscious but to devise a method for systematically studying it, and his claims about the dynamics and structure of the unconscious.

Dreams, which he called the "royal road to the unconscious," provided the best access to our unconscious life and the best illustration of its "logic", which was different from the logic of conscious thought. Freud developed his first topology of the psyche in The Interpretation of Dreams (1899) in which he proposed the argument that the unconscious exists and described a method for gaining access to it. The preconscious was described as a layer between conscious and unconscious thought—that which we could access with a little effort. Thus for Freud, the ideals of the Enlightenment, positivism and rationalism, could be achieved through understanding, transforming, and mastering the unconscious, rather than through denying or repressing it.

Crucial to the operation of the unconscious is "repression." According to Freud, people often experience thoughts and feelings that are so painful that they cannot bear them. Such thoughts and feelings—and associated memories—could not, Freud argued, be banished from the mind, but could be banished from consciousness. Thus they come to constitute the unconscious. Although Freud later attempted to find patterns of repression among his patients in order to derive a general model of the mind, he also observed that individual patients repress different things. Moreover, Freud observed that the process of repression is itself a non-conscious act (in other words, it did not occur through people willing away certain thoughts or feelings). Freud supposed that what people repressed was in part determined by their unconscious. In other words, the unconscious was for Freud both a cause and effect of repression.

Later, Freud distinguished between three concepts of the unconscious: the descriptive unconscious, the dynamic unconscious, and the system unconscious. The descriptive unconscious referred to all those features of mental life of which people are not subjectively aware. The dynamic unconscious, a more specific construct, referred to mental processes and contents which are defensively removed from consciousness as a result of conflicting attitudes. The system unconscious denoted the idea that when mental processes are repressed, they become organized by principles different from those of the conscious mind, such as condensation and displacement.

Eventually, Freud abandoned the idea of the system unconscious, replacing it with the concept of the Ego, super-ego, and id (discussed below). Throughout his career, however, he retained the descriptive and dynamic conceptions of the unconscious.

Psychosexual development

Freud hoped to prove that his model was universally valid and thus turned to ancient mythology and contemporary ethnography for comparative material. Freud named his new theory the Oedipus complex after the famous Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex by Sophocles. "I found in myself a constant love for my mother, and jealousy of my father. I now consider this to be a universal event in childhood," Freud said. Freud sought to anchor this pattern of development in the dynamics of the mind. Each stage is a progression into adult sexual maturity, characterized by a strong ego and the ability to delay gratification (cf. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality). He used the Oedipus conflict to point out how much he believed that people desire incest and must repress that desire. The Oedipus conflict was described as a state of psychosexual development and awareness. He also turned to anthropological studies of totemism and argued that totemism reflected a ritualized enactment of a tribal Oedipal conflict.

Freud originally posited childhood sexual abuse as a general explanation for the origin of neuroses, but he abandoned this so-called "seduction theory" as insufficiently explanatory, noting that he had found many cases in which apparent memories of childhood sexual abuse were based more on imagination than on real events. During the late 1890s Freud, who never abandoned his belief in the sexual etiology of neuroses, began to emphasize fantasies built around the Oedipus complex as the primary cause of hysteria and other neurotic symptoms. Despite this change in his explanatory model, Freud always recognized that some neurotics had been sexually abused by their fathers, and was quite explicit about discussing several patients whom he knew to have been abused.[18]

Freud also believed that the libido developed in individuals by changing its object, a process codified by the concept of sublimation. He argued that humans are born "polymorphously perverse", meaning that any number of objects could be a source of pleasure. He further argued that, as humans develop, they become fixated on different and specific objects through their stages of development—first in the oral stage (exemplified by an infant's pleasure in nursing), then in the anal stage (exemplified by a toddler's pleasure in evacuating his or her bowels), then in the phallic stage. Freud argued that children then passed through a stage in which they fixated on the mother as a sexual object (known as the Oedipus Complex) but that the child eventually overcame and repressed this desire because of its taboo nature. (The lesser known Electra complex refers to such a fixation on the father.) The repressive or dormant latency stage of psychosexual development preceded the sexually mature genital stage of psychosexual development.

Freud's way of interpretation has been called phallocentric by many contemporary thinkers. This is because, for Freud, the unconscious desires for the phallus (penis). Males are afraid of losing their masculinity, symbolized by the phallus, to another male. Females always desire to have a phallus - an unfulfillable desire. Thus boys resent their fathers (fear of castration) and girls desire theirs. For Freud, desire is always defined in the negative term of lack - you always desire what you don't have or what you are not, and it is very unlikely that you will fulfill this desire. Thus his psychoanalysis treatment is meant to teach the patient to cope with his or her insatiable desires.

Ego, super-ego, and id

In his later work, Freud proposed that the psyche could be divided into three parts: Ego, super-ego, and id. The id is known as the child-like portion of the psyche that is very impulsive and only takes into account what it wants and disregards all consequences. The super-ego is the moral code of the psyche that solely follow right and wrong and takes into account no special circumstances in which the morally right thing may not be right for that situation. Finally, the ego is the balance between the two. It is the part of the psyche that is, usually, portrayed in the person's action, and after the super-ego and id are balanced, the ego acts in a way that takes both impulses and morality into consideration.

Freud discussed this structural model of the mind in the 1920 essay Beyond the Pleasure Principle, and fully elaborated it in The Ego and the Id (1923), where he developed it as an alternative to his previous topographic schema (conscious, unconscious, preconscious).

Freud acknowledges that his use of the term Id (or the It) derives from the writings of Georg Grodeck. It is interesting to note that the term Id appears in the earliest writing of Boris Sidis, attributed to William James, as early as 1898.

The life and death instincts

Freud believed that humans were driven by two conflicting central desires: the life drive (libido) (survival, propagation, hunger, thirst, and sex) and the death drive (Thanatos). Freud's description of Cathexis, whose energy is known as libido, included all creative, life-producing drives. The death drive (or death instinct), whose energy is known as anticathexis, represented an urge inherent in all living things to return to a state of calm: in other words, an inorganic or dead state. He recognized Thanatos only in his later years and develops his theory on the death drive in Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Freud approaches the paradox between the life drives and the death drives by defining pleasure and unpleasure. According to Freud, unpleasure refers to stimulus that the body receives. (For example, excessive friction on the skin's surface produces a burning sensation; or, the bombardment of visual stimuli amidst rush hour traffic produces anxiety.) Conversely, pleasure is a result of a decrease in stimuli (for example, a calm environment the body enters after having been subjected to a hectic environment). If pleasure increases as stimuli decreases, then the ultimate experience of pleasure for Freud would be zero stimulus, or death. Given this proposition, Freud acknowledges the tendency for the unconscious to repeat unpleasurable experiences in order to desensitize, or deaden, the body. This compulsion to repeat unpleasurable experiences explains why traumatic nightmares occur in dreams, as nightmares seem to contradict Freud's earlier conception of dreams purely as a site of pleasure, fantasy, and desire. On the one hand, the life drives promote survival by avoiding extreme unpleasure and any threat to life. On the other hand, the death drive functions simultaneously toward extreme pleasure, which leads to death. Freud addresses the conceptual dualities of pleasure and unpleasure, as well as sex/life and death, in his discussions on masochism and sadomasochism. The tension between Eros and Thanatos represents a revolution in his manner of thinking. Some also refer to the death instinct as the Nirvana Principle.

It should be added that these ideas resemble aspects of the philosophies of Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche. Schopenhauer's pessimistic philosophy, expounded in The World as Will and Representation, describes a renunciation of the will to live that corresponds on many levels with Freud's Death Drive. Similarly, the life drive clearly parallels much of Nietzsche's concept of the Dionysian in The Birth of Tragedy. However, Freud denied having been acquainted with their writings before he formulated the groundwork of his own ideas.[19]

Freud's legacy

File:1freud-enlargement.JPG
Freud on 1980s 50 Austrian Schilling note

Psychotherapy

Freud's theories and research methods were controversial during his life and still are so today, but few dispute his tremendous impact on psychologists and many academic disciplines.

Most importantly, Freud popularized the "talking-cure"—an idea that a person could solve problems simply by talking over them, something that was almost unheard of in the 19th century. Even though many psychotherapists today tend to reject the specifics of Freud's theories, this basic mode of treatment comes largely from his work.

Most of Freud's specific theories—like his stages of psychosexual development—and especially his methodology, have fallen out of favor in modern experimental psychology.

Some psychotherapists, however, still follow an approximately Freudian system of treatment. Many more have modified his approach, or joined one of the schools that branched from his original theories (see Neo-Freudian). Still others reject his theories entirely, although their practice may still reflect his influence.

Psychoanalysis today maintains the same ambivalent relationship with medicine and academia that Freud experienced during his life.

Philosophy

While he saw himself as a scientist, Freud greatly admired Theodor Lipps, a philosopher and main supporter of the ideas of the subconscious and empathy.[20] Freud's theories have had a tremendous effect on the humanities—especially on the Frankfurt school and critical theory. Freud had an incisive influence on French philosophers like Derrida and Lyotard following the "return to Freud"" of the French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan. Freud's model of the mind is often criticized as an unsubstantiated challenge to the enlightenment model of rational agency, which was a key element of much modern philosophy.

Rationality
While many enlightenment thinkers viewed rationality as both an unproblematic ideal and a defining feature of man [citation needed], Freud's model of the mind drastically reduced the scope and power of reason. In Freud's view, reasoning occurs in the conscious mind --the ego-- but this is only a small part of the whole. The mind also contains the hidden, irrational elements of id and superego, which lie outside of conscious control, drive behavior, and motivate conscious activities. As a result, these structures call into question humans' ability to act purely on the basis of reason, since lurking motives are also always at play. Moreover, this model of the mind makes rationality itself suspect, since it may be motivated by hidden urges or societal forces (e.g. defense mechanisms, where reasoning becomes "rationalizing").
Transparency of Self
Freud challenged the idea of empiricists such as John Locke and David Hume that the workings of the mind can be understood by introspection. He considered many central aspects of a person remain radically inaccessible to the conscious mind (without the aid of psychotherapy).

Critical reactions

Although Freud's theories were influential, they came under widespread criticism during his lifetime and afterward. A paper by Lydiard H. Horton, read in 1915 at a joint meeting of the American Psychological Association and the New York Academy of Sciences, called Freud's dream theory "dangerously inaccurate" and noted that "rank confabulations...appear to hold water, psychoanalytically" [21]. Peter D. Kramer, a psychiatrist and faculty member of Brown Medical School, said "I'm afraid [Freud] doesn't hold up very well at all. It almost feels like a personal betrayal to say that. But every particular is wrong: the universality of the Oedipus complex, penis envy, infantile sexuality." A 2006 article in Newsweek magazine called him "history's most debunked doctor."[22]

Freud's theories are often criticized for not being real science.[23] This objection was raised by Karl Popper, who claimed that all proper scientific theories must be potentially falsifiable. Popper argued that no experiment or observation could ever falsify Freud's theories of psychology (e.g. someone who denies having an Oedipal complex is interpreted as repressing it), and thus they could not be considered scientific.[24] Author Richard Webster characterized Freud's work as a "complex pseudo-science"[25].

H. J. Eysenck claims that Freud 'set psychiatry back one hundred years', consistently mis-diagnosed his patients, fraudulently misrepresented case histories and that "what is true in Freud is not new and what is new in Freud is not true".[26]

Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen claims that "The truth is that Freud knew from the very start that Fleischl, Anna O. and his 18 patients were not cured, and yet he did not hesitate to build grand theories on these non-existent foundations...he disguised fragments of his self-analysis as ‘objective’ cases, that he concealed his sources, that he conveniently antedated some of his analyses, that he sometimes attributed to his patients ‘free associations’ that he himself made up, that he inflated his therapeutic successes, that he slandered his opponents."[2]

Among adherents of Freudian thought, a frequently criticized aspect of Freud's belief system is his model of psychosexual development, including Freud's claim that infants are sexual beings.[citation needed] Others have accepted Freud's expanded notion of sexuality, but have argued that this pattern of development is not universal, nor necessary for the development of a healthy adult.[citation needed] Instead, they have emphasized the social and environmental sources of patterns of development. Moreover, they call attention to social dynamics Freud de-emphasized or ignored, such as class relations. This branch of Freudian critique owes a great deal to the work of Herbert Marcuse.

Freud has also come under fire from many feminist critics.[citation needed] Although Freud was an early champion of both sexual freedom and education for women (Freud, "Civilized Sexual Morality and Modern Nervousness"), some feminists have argued that at worst his views of women's sexual development set the progress of women in Western culture back decades, and that at best they lent themselves to the ideology of female inferiority [citation needed]. Believing as he did that women are a kind of mutilated male, who must learn to accept their "deformity" (the "lack" of a penis) and submit to some imagined biological imperative, he contributed to the vocabulary of misogyny [citation needed]. Terms such as "penis envy" and "castration anxiety" contributed to discouraging women from entering any field dominated by men, until the 1970s [citation needed]. Some of Freud's most criticized [citation needed] statements appear in his 'Fragment of Analysis' on Ida Bauer such as "This was surely just the situation to call up distinct feelings of sexual excitement in a girl of fourteen" in reference to Dora being kissed by a 'young man of prepossessing appearance'[27] implying the passivity of female sexuality and his statement "I should without question consider a person hysterical in whom an occasion for sexual excitement elicited feelings that were preponderantly or exclusively unpleasurable"[28].

On the other hand, feminist theorists such as Juliet Mitchell, Nancy Chodorow, Jessica Benjamin, Jane Gallop, and Jane Flax have argued that psychoanalytic theory is essentially related to the feminist project and must, like other theoretical traditions, be adapted by women to free it from vestiges of sexism [citation needed]. Major French feminists psychoanalysts like Luce Irigaray, Julia Kristeva and Bracha L. Ettinger elaborate Freudian theory and insights in order both to develop them and to criticize them, arriving, in the case of Irigaray and Ettinger into new propositions regarding the feminine. Freud's views are still being questioned by people concerned about women's equality[citation needed]. Another feminist who finds potential use of Freud's theories in the feminist movement is Shulamith Firestone. In "Freudianism: The Misguided Feminism", she discusses how Freudianism is essentially completely accurate, with the exception of one crucial detail: everywhere that Freud wrote "penis", the word should be replaced with "power".

Dr. Jurgen von Scheidt speculated that most of Freud's psychoanalytical theory was a byproduct of his cocaine use.[29] Chronic cocaine use can produce unusual thinking patterns due to the depletion of dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex.

Additionally, Freud has been widely criticized for his impact on survivors of sexual violence. Throughout his work, he came to the realization that many psychological disorders were caused by sexual trauma. After publishing these findings, he was ridiculed by the mental health community so, to protect his reputation, he declared that his findings were incorrect and these women were all lying about being abused. This has, in the opinions of many specialists in the area, led to decades of disbelieving sexual abuse survivors.[citation needed]

Patients

Freud used pseudonyms in his case histories. Many of the people identified only by pseudonyms were traced to their true identities by Peter Swales (historian). This is a partial list of patients whose case studies were published by Freud:

File:Freud Sofa.JPG
Freud's couch used during psychoanalytic sessions
  • Anna O. = Bertha Pappenheim (1859–1936)
  • Cäcilie M. = Anna von Lieben
  • Dora = Ida Bauer (1882–1945)
  • Frau Emmy von N. = Fanny Moser
  • Fräulein Elisabeth von R. = Ilona Weiss[30]
  • Fräulein Katharina = Aurelia Kronich
  • Fräulein Lucy R.
  • Little Hans = Herbert Graf (1903–1973)
  • Rat Man = Ernst Lanzer (1878–1914)
  • Wolf Man = Sergei Pankejeff (1887–1979)

Other patients:

People on whom psychoanalytic observations were published but who were not patients:

Freud was a member of B'nai B'rith order in Vienna. In 2004 the seat of French lodge in Paris has been named after Sigmund Freud. [31]

From 1921 until 1937 Freud and Girindrasekhar Bose used to write letters to each other. Bose was the founder of Indian Psychoanalytic Society [32], [33].

Edward Bernays was Freud's nephew. His father was Ely Bernays, brother of Freud's wife Martha Bernays, and his mother was Freud's sister Anna.

Notes

  1. ^ Gresser, Moshe (1994). Dual Allegiance: Freud As a Modern Jew. SUNY Press. p. 225. ISBN 0791418111.
  2. ^ Expertensprechen zum Thema Aale
  3. ^ Was dachten Nazis über den Aal? : Textarchiv : Berliner Zeitung
  4. ^ Der Aal im Nationalsozialismus
  5. ^ a b Hall, Calvin, S. (1954). A Primer in Freudian Psychology. Meridian Book. ISBN 0452011833.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ Bowlby, John (1999). Attachment and Loss: Vol I, 2nd Ed. Basic Books. pp. 13–23. ISBN 0-465-00543-8.
  7. ^ Joseph Aguayo Charcot and Freud: Some Implications of Late 19th Century French Psychiatry and Politics for the Origins of Psychoanalysis (1986). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 9:223-260
  8. ^ [http://www.healthcentral.com/anxiety/c/1950/20288/freud-101/ AnxietyConnection.com Jerry KennardFreud 101: Psychoanalysis Tuesday, February 12, 2008]
  9. ^ Freudfile Sigmund Freud Life and Work - Jean-Martin Charcot
  10. ^ Gay, Peter (1988). Freud: A Life for Our Time. pp. p.65-66. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  11. ^ Hans Jurgen Eysenck. Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire. Transaction Publishers. 2004, p146
  12. ^ Blumenthal, Ralph (24 December 2006). "Hotel log hints at desire that Freud didn't repress". International Herald Tribune.
  13. ^ "The Life of Sigmund Freud". WGBH Educational Foundation. 2004. Retrieved 2007-11-24. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  14. ^ Gay, Peter (1999-03-29). "The TIME 100: Sigmund Freud". Time Inc. Retrieved 2007-11-24. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  15. ^ Gay, Peter (1988). Freud: A Life for Our Time. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  16. ^ Meyer (2005, 217).
  17. ^ Altschule, M (1977). Origins of Concepts in Human Behavior. New York: Wiley. p. 199., cited in Allen Esterson, Freud returns?
  18. ^ Freud: A Life for Our Time. pp. p.95. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  19. ^ Zilborg,Beyond the Pleasure Principle. pp. p.xxvii. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  20. ^ Pigman, G.W. (1995). "Freud and the history of empathy". The International journal of psycho-analysis. 76 (Pt 2): 237–56. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  21. ^ The Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  22. ^ Freud: At 150, He's Still Captivating Us - Newsweek Society - MSNBC.com
  23. ^ Ludwig, 1973, pg. 93
  24. ^ Karl Popper, "Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report," in British Philosophy in the Mid-Century: A Cambridge Symposium, ed. C. A. Mace (1957), 155-91; reprinted in Karl Popper, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (1963; 2d ed., 1965), 33-65.
  25. ^ Webster, Richard (1995). Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis. Basic Books.
  26. ^ Eysenck, Hans, Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1986)
  27. ^ Freud, Sigmund (1993). Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria. Macmillan. ISBN 0-02-050987-1.
  28. ^ Freud, Sigmund (1993). Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria. Macmillan. ISBN 0-02-050987-1.
  29. ^ Scheidt, Jürgen vom (1973). "Sigmund Freud and cocaine". Psyche: pp. 385–430. {{cite journal}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  30. ^ Appignanesi & Forrester (1992). Freud's Women. pp. p.108. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  31. ^ B’nai B’rith Europe - THE ONLY OFFICIAL WEBSITE
  32. ^ Freud on Garuda's Wings, Psychoanalysis in Colonial India
  33. ^ Indian Psychoanalytic Society (short information)
  • Corey, Gerald (2000). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 6th ed. ISBN 0534348238

Bibliography

Major works by Freud

Correspondence

Books about Freud and psychoanalysis

  • Ernest Jones : "The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud.", Publisher: Basic Books, 1981, ISBN 0-465-04015-2
  • "The Language of Psycho-Analysis" , Jean Laplanche et J.B. Pontalis, Editeur: W. W. Norton & Company, 1974, ISBN 0-393-01105-4
  • "Sigmund Freud and Lou Andreas-Salome" : Letters" Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company (November 1985), ISBN 0-393-30261-X
  • Lou Andreas-Salome : "The Freud Journal" , Publisher: Texas Bookman, 1996, ISBN 0-7043-0022-2
  • Sabina Spielrein : "Destruction as cause of becoming", 1993, OCLC 44450080
  • Marthe Robert: "The Psychoanalytic Revolution", Publisher: Avon Books; Discus ed edition, 1968, OCLC 2401215
  • Jean-Michel Quinodoz : Reading Freud: A Chronological Exploration of Freud's Writings, Publisher: Routledge; 2005, ISBN 1583917470
  • Appignanesi, Lisa & Forrester, John, "Freud's Women" Publisher: Weidenfeld & Nicolson: London. (1992). ISBN 0-75381-916-3
  • Bettelheim, Bruno : "Freud and Man's Soul: An Important Re-Interpretation of Freudian Theory" Publisher: Vintage; Vintage edition, 1983, ISBN 0-394-71036-3
  • Gay, Peter : "Freud: A Life For Our Time" Publisher: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, London, 1988, ISBN 0-333-48638-2
  • André Green: "The Work of the Negative" by Andre Green, Andrew Weller (Translator), Publisher: Free Association Books, 1999, ISBN 1-85343-470-1
  • André Green: "On Private Madness", Publisher: International Universities Press, 1997, ISBN 0-8236-3853-7
  • André Green: "The Chains of Eros", Publisher: Karnac Books, 2002, ISBN 1-85575-960-8
  • André Green: "Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm For Clinical Thinking" Publisher: Free Association Books, 2005, ISBN 1-85343-773-5
  • John Farrell. Freud's Paranoid Quest: Psychoanalysis and Modern Suspicion (NYU Press, 1996). A vigorous account of the relations between Freud's logic, rhetoric, and personality, as well as his relations with literary sources like Cervantes, Goethe, and Swift.
  • Lear, Jonathan. Love and Its Place in Nature. A Philosophical Interpretation of Psychoanalysis. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1990.
  • Parisi, Thomas. "Civilization and Its Discontents. An Anthropology for the Future". Twayne, 1999. ISBN 0-8057-7934-5.
  • Rieff, Philip. Freud: The Mind of the Moralist, 3d ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).
  • Roazen, Paul. Freud and His Followers (Random House, 1975). A rich study of the development of psychoanalysis, based upon many personal interviews.
  • Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth (1992). Freud on Women: A Reader. Norton. ISBN 0-393-30870-7.
  • Anthony Bateman and Jeremy Holmes, Introduction to Psychoanalysis: Contemporary Theory & Practice (London: Routledge, 1995)
  • Isbister, J. N. "Freud, An Introduction to his Life and Work" Publisher: Polity Press: Cambridge, Oxford. (1985)

Conceptual critiques

  • Robert Aziz, The Syndetic Paradigm:The Untrodden Path Beyond Freud and Jung (2007), a refereed publication of The State University of New York Press. ISBN-13:978-0-7914-6982-8.
  • Adler, Mortimer J., What Man Has Made of Man: A Study of the Consequences of Platonism and Positivism in Psychology (New York: Longmans, Green, 1937). (A philosophical critique from an Aristotelian/Thomistic point of view.)
  • Cioffi, Frank. Freud and the Question of Pseudoscience. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court, 1998.
  • Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem and Helen R. Lane (London and New York: Continuum, 2004). (This first volume of the famous two-part work (also subtitled Capitalism and Schizophrenia) polemicises Freud's argument that the Oedipal complex determines subjectivity. It is also, therefore, a staunch critique of the Lacanian 'return to Freud.)
  • Henri Ellenberger, The Discovery of the Unconscious: the History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry (London: Penguin, 1970). (An extensive account and sensitive critique of Freudian metapsychology.) (Swiss link: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_F._Ellenberger)
  • Esterson, Allen, "Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud." Chicago: Open Court, 1993.
  • Eysenck, H. J. and Wilson, G. D. The Experimental Study of Freudian Theories, Methuen, London (1973).
  • Eysenck, Hans, Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1986).
  • Hobson, J. Allan Hobson, Dreaming: An Introduction to the Science of Sleep (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004). ISBN 0-19-280482-0. (Critique of Freud's dream theory in terms of current neuroscience)
  • Johnston, Thomas, Freud and Political Thought (New York: Citadel, 1965). (One of the more accessible accounts of the import of Freudianism for political theory.)
  • Kofman, Sarah, The Enigma of Woman: Woman in Freud's Writings (Ithaca, NY, & London: Cornell University Press, 1985).
  • Marcuse, Herbert, Eros and Civilization: A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1974). (Mentioned above. For a good review, see Stirk, Peter M. R., ‘Eros and Civilization revisited’, History of the Human Sciences, 12 (1), 1999, pp. 73–90.)
  • Mitchell, Juliet. Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Freudian Psychoanalysis Originally published in 1974; Basic Books reissue (2000) ISBN 0-465-04608-8
  • Chasseguet-Smirgel, Janine & Grunberger, Béla. Freud or Reich? Psychoanalysis and Illusion. (London: Free Association Books, 1986)
  • Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson, The Assault on Truth: Freud's Suppression of the Seduction Theory, Ballantine Books (November 2003), ISBN 0-345-45279-8
  • Neu, Jerome (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Freud (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994). (A good conceptual overview.)
  • Ricoeur, Paul, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, trans. Denis Savage (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1972).
  • —, The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics, ed. Don Ihde (London: Continuum, 2004). (A critical examination of the import of Freud for philosophy.)
  • Roazen, Paul. Freud and His Followers (New York: Random House, 1975).
  • Szasz, Thomas. Anti-Freud: Karl Kraus's Criticism of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, Syracuse University Press, 1990, ISBN 0-8156-0247-2.
  • Torrey, E. Fuller (1992). Freudian Fraud: The Malignant Effect of Freud's Theory on American Thought and Culture. New York, NY : HarperCollins.
  • Voloshinov, Valentin. Freudianism: A Marxist critique, Academic Press (1976) ISBN 0-12-723250-8
  • Wollheim, Richard, Freud, 2nd edn. (London: Fontana, 1991). (A good starting point.)

Biographies

The area of biography has been especially contentious in the historiography of psychoanalysis, for two primary reasons: first, following his death, significant portions of his personal papers were for several decades made available only at the permission of his biological and intellectual heirs (his daughter, Anna Freud, was extremely protective of her father's reputation); second, much of the data and theory of Freudian psychoanalysis hinges upon the personal testimony of Freud himself, and so to challenge Freud's legitimacy or honesty has been seen by many as an attack on the roots of his enduring work.

The first biographies of Freud were written by Freud himself: his On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement (1914) and An Autobiographical Study (1924) provided much of the basis for discussions by later biographers, including "debunkers" (as they contain a number of prominent omissions and potential misrepresentations). A few of the major biographies on Freud to come out over the 20th century were:

  • Helen Walker Puner, Freud: His Life and His Mind (1947) — Puner's "facts" were often shaky at best but she was remarkably insightful with regard to Freud's unanalyzed relationship to his mother, Amalia.
  • Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, 3 vols. (1953–1958) — the first "authorized" biography of Freud, made by one of his former students with the authorization and assistance of Anna Freud, with the hope of "dispelling the myths" from earlier biographies. Though this is the most comprehensive biography of Freud, Jones has been accused of writing more of a hagiography than a history of Freud. Among his questionable assertions, Jones diagnosed his own analyst, Ferenczi, as "psychotic." In the same breath, Jones also maligned Otto Rank, Ferenczi's close friend and Jones's most important rival for leadership of the movement in the 1920s.
  • Henri Ellenberger, The Discovery of the Unconscious (1970) — was the first book to, in a compelling way, attempt to situate Freud within the context of his time and intellectual thought, arguing that he was the intellectual heir of Franz Mesmer and that the genesis of his theory owed a large amount to the political context of turn of the 19th century Vienna. (Swiss link: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_F._Ellenberger)
  • Frank Sulloway, Freud: Biologist of the Mind (1979) — Sulloway, one of the first professional/academic historians to write a biography of Freud, positioned Freud within the larger context of the history of science, arguing specifically that Freud was, in fact, a biologist in disguise (a "crypto-biologist", in Sulloway's terms), and sought to actively hide this.
  • Peter Gay, Freud: A Life for Our Time (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988) — Gay's impressively scholarly work was published in part as a response to the anti-Freudian literature and the "Freud Wars" of the 1980s (see below). Gay's book is probably the best pro-Freud biography available, though he is not completely uncritical of his hero. His "Bibliographical Essay" at the end of the volume provides astute evaluations of the voluminous literature on Freud up to the mid-1980s.
  • Breger, Louis. "Freud: Darkness in the Midst of Vision." (New York: Wiley, 2000). Though written from a psychoanalytic point of view (the author is a former President of the Institute of Contemporary Psychoanalysis), this is a "warts and all" life of Sigmund Freud. It corrects, in the light of historical research of recent decades, many (though not quite all) of several disputed traditional historical accounts of events uncritically recycled by Peter Gay.

The creation of Freud biographies has itself even been written about at some length—see, for example, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl, "A History of Freud Biographies," in Discovering the History of Psychiatry, edited by Mark S. Micale and Roy Porter (Oxford University Press, 1994).

Biographical critiques

  • Bakan, David. Sigmund Freud and the Jewish Mystical Tradition, D. Van Nostrand Company, 1958; New York, Schocken Books, 1965; Dover Publications, 2004. ISBN 0-486-43767-1
  • Crews, F. C. Unauthorized Freud : doubters confront a legend, New York, Viking 1998. ISBN 0-670-87221-0
  • Dolnick, Edward. Madness on the Couch: Blaming the Victim in the Heyday of Psychoanalysis ISBN 0-684-82497-3
  • Dufresne, T. Killing Freud, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2003.
  • Esterson, Allen, "Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud." Chicago: Open Court, 1993.
  • Eysenck, H. J. The Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire, Scott-Townsend Publishers, Washington D. C., (1990)
  • Farrell, John. Freud's Paranoid Quest: Psychoanalysis and Modern Suspicion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
  • Jurjevich, R. M. The Hoax of Freudism: A study of Brainwashing the American Professionals and Laymen Dorrance (1974) ISBN 0-8059-1856-6
  • LaPiere, R. T. The Freudian Ethic: An Analysis of the Subversion of Western Character Greenwood Press (1974) ISBN 0-8371-7543-7
  • Lear, Jonathan. Freud Routledge (2005) ISBN 0-415-31451-8
  • Ludwig, Emil, Doctor Freud, Manor Books, New York, 1973
  • MacDonald, Kevin B. The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements Authorhouse (2002) ISBN 0-7596-7222-9
  • Macmillan, Malcolm. Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc MIT Press, 1996 ISBN 0-262-63171-7 [originally published by New Holland, 1991]
  • Scharnberg, Max. The non-authentic nature of Freud's observations, Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1993 ISBN 91-554-3122-4
  • Stannard, D. E. Shrinking History: On Freud and the Failure of Psychohistory Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980) ISBN 0-19-503044-3
  • Thornton, E. M. Freud and Cocaine: The Freudian Fallacy, Blond & Briggs, London (1983) ISBN 0-85634-139-8
  • Webster, Richard. Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science, and Psychoanalysis BasicBooks, 1995. ISBN 0-465-09579-8

See also

Topics

People

Template:Psychology navigation

Template:Persondata

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA