Evolutionary biology: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 465051838 by Hans Adler (talk)I think you need to follow the discussions more carefully and take it to Talk:evolution.
m Reverted 1 edit by Danielkueh (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by Hans Adler. (TW)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{merge|Evolution|discuss=Talk:Evolutionary biology#Merge with Evolution|date=August 2011}}
#REDIRECT [[Evolution]]
{{Template:Evolutionary biology}}

[[File:Tree of life SVG.svg|right|thumb|Graphical representation of the modern [[Tree of Life Web Project|"Tree of Life on the Web" project]].]]
'''[[Evolution]]ary biology''' is a sub-field of [[biology]] concerned with the origin of [[species]] from a [[common descent]] and descent of species, as well as their [[evolution|change]], multiplication and diversity over time. Someone who studies evolutionary biology is known as an '''evolutionary biologist'''. To philosopher [[Kim Sterelny]], "the development of evolutionary biology since 1858 is one of the great intellectual achievements of science".<ref name="sterelny2009">{{cite book|title= Evolution: The First Four Billion Years| author=Sterelny, K.| chapter=Philosophy of Evolutionary Thought | editors=Michael Ruse & Joseph Travis | year=2009 | publisher= The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press | location = Cambridge, Massachusetts |isbn=978-0-674-03175-3 | page=313}}</ref>

==Description==
Evolutionary biology is an [[interdisciplinary]] field, in that it includes scientists from a wide range of both [[Field work|field]] and [[Laboratory|lab]] oriented disciplines. For example, it generally includes scientists who may have a specialist training in particular [[organism]]s such as [[mammalogy]], [[ornithology]], or [[herpetology]], but use those organisms as [[Case study|case studies]] to answer general questions in evolution. It also generally includes [[paleontology|paleontologists]] and [[geology|geologists]] who use [[fossils]] to answer questions about the tempo and mode of evolution, as well as theoreticians in areas such as [[population genetics]] and [[evolutionary psychology]]. Experimentalists have used selection in [[Drosophila]] to develop an understanding of the [[evolution of aging]], and [[experimental evolution]] is a very active subdiscipline.

In the 1990s [[developmental biology]] made a re-entry into evolutionary biology, from its initial exclusion from the modern synthesis, through the study of [[evolutionary developmental biology]].

Findings from evolutionary biology feed strongly into new disciplines that study mankind's [[sociocultural evolution]] and [[evolutionary psychology|evolutionary behavior]]. Evolutionary biology's frameworks of ideas and conceptual tools are now finding application in the study of a range of subjects from [[computing]] to [[nanotechnology]]. It also contributes to the field of [[evolutionary medicine]].<ref name="Nesse&Williams">{{cite book | title= Evolution and Healing: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine | authors= Nesse, R.M., & Williams, G.C.| year=1996 | publisher=Phoenix | location = London |isbn=1-85799-506-6}}</ref><ref name="Antolin">{{cite book|title= Evolution: The First Four Billion Years| author=Antolin, M.F.| chapter=Evolutionary Biology of Disease and Darwinian Medicine | editors=Michael Ruse & Joseph Travis | year=2009 | publisher= The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press | location = Cambridge, Massachusetts |isbn=978-0-674-03175-3 | pages=281–298}}</ref>

[[Artificial life]] is a sub-field of [[bioinformatics]] that attempts to model, or even recreate, the evolution of organisms as described by evolutionary biology. Usually this is done through mathematics and computer models.

== History ==
{{Main|History of evolutionary thought}}

Evolutionary biology as an [[academic discipline]] in its own right emerged as a result of the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] in the 1930s and 1940s.<ref name="evolutionthe1st4billionyears314">Sterelny (2009) p.314</ref> It was not until the 1970s and 1980s, however, that a significant number of universities had departments that specifically included the term ''evolutionary biology'' in their titles. In the [[United States]], as a result of the rapid growth of [[molecular biology|molecular]] and [[cell biology]], many universities have split (or aggregated) their biology departments into ''molecular and cell biology''-style departments and ''ecology and evolutionary biology''-style departments (which often have subsumed older departments in [[paleontology]], [[zoology]] and the like).

[[Microbiology]] has recently developed into an evolutionary discipline. It was originally ignored due to the paucity of morphological traits and the lack of a species concept in microbiology. Now, evolutionary researchers are taking advantage of our extensive understanding of microbial physiology, the ease of microbial [[genomics]], and the quick generation time of some microbes to answer evolutionary questions. Similar features have led to progress in [[virus|viral]] evolution, particularly for [[bacteriophages]].

===Current research===
Current research in evolutionary biology covers diverse topics, as should be expected given the centrality of evolution to understanding biology. Modern evolutionary biology incorporates ideas from diverse areas of science, such as [[molecular genetics]] and even [[computer science]].

First, some fields of evolutionary research try to explain phenomena that were poorly accounted for by the work of the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]]. These phenomena include [[speciation]]<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Wiens JJ |year=2004 |title=What is speciation and how should we study it? |journal= American Naturalist |volume=163 |issue=6 |pages=914–923 |doi= 10.1086/386552 |url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/386552 }}</ref>, the [[evolution of sexual reproduction]]<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Otto SP |year=2009 |title=The evolutionary enigma of sex |journal= American Naturalist |volume=174 |issue=s1 |pages=S1-S14 |doi= 10.1086/599084 |url=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/599084}}</ref>, the evolution of [[Co-operation (evolution)|cooperation]], the [[evolution of ageing]], and [[evolvability]]<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Jesse Love Hendrikse, Trish Elizabeth Parsons, Benedikt Hallgrímsson|year=2007 |title=Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology |journal= Evolution & Development |volume=9 |issue=4 |pages=393–401 |doi= 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00176.x }}</ref>.

Second, biologists ask the most straightforward evolutionary question: "what happened and when?". This includes fields such as [[paleobiology]], as well as [[systematics]] and [[phylogenetics]].

Third, the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] was devised at a time when nobody understood the molecular basis of genes. Today, evolutionary biologists try to determine the [[genetic architecture]] of interesting evolutionary phenomena such as [[adaptation]] and [[speciation]]. They seek answers to questions such as how many genes are involved, how large are the effects of each gene, to what extent are the effects of different genes interdependent, what sort of function do the genes involved tend to have, and what sort of changes tend to happen to them (e.g. [[point mutations]] vs. [[gene duplication]] or even [[polyploidy|genome duplication]]). Evolutionary biologists try to reconcile the high [[heritability]] seen in [[twin studies]] with the difficulty in finding which genes are responsible for this heritability using [[genome-wide association studies]].<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A , Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TFC, McCarroll SA , Visscher PM |year=2009 |title= Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases |journal= Nature |volume=461 |issue=7265 |pages=747–753 |url=http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7265/full/nature08494.html |doi= 10.1038/nature08494}}</ref>

One challenge in studying genetic architecture is that the classical [[population genetics]] that catalyzed the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] needs to be updated to take into account modern molecular knowledge. This requires a great deal of mathematical development, in order to relate DNA sequence data to evolutionary theory as part of a theory of [[molecular evolution]]. For example, biologists try to infer which genes have been under strong selection by detecting [[selective sweeps]].<ref>{{cite journal |authors=Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, Levine HZP, Richter DJ, Schaffner SF, Gabriel SB, Platko JV, Patterson NJ, McDonald GJ, Ackerman HC, Campbell SJ, Altshuler D, Cooper R, Kwiatkowski D, Ward R, Lander ES |year=2002 |title= Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure |journal= Nature |volume=419 |pages=832–837 |url= http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v419/n6909/full/nature01140.html |doi= 10.1038/nature01140 |issue=6909 |pmid=12397357}}</ref>

Fourth, the [[modern evolutionary synthesis]] involved agreement about which forces contribute to evolution, but not about their relative importance.<ref>{{cite book |authors=Provine WB |year=1988| title=Evolutionary progress |chapter= Progress in evolution and meaning in life | pages=49–79 |publisher=University of Chicago Press}}</ref> Current research seeks to determine this. Evolutionary forces include [[natural selection]], [[sexual selection]], [[genetic drift]], [[genetic hitchhiking|genetic draft]], developmental constraints, mutation bias and [[biogeography]].

An evolutionary approach is also key to much current research in biology that does not set out to study evolution per se, especially in organismal biology and [[ecology]]. For example, evolutionary thinking is key to [[life history theory]]. [[gene finding|Annotation of genes]] and their function relies heavily on comparative, i.e. evolutionary, approaches. The field of [[Evolutionary developmental biology|evo-devo]] investigates how developmental processes work by using the comparative method to determine how they evolved.

==Notable evolutionary biologists==
{{maincat|Evolutionary biologists}}
;Notable contributors to evolutionary biology
<div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2">
* [[Richard D. Alexander]]
* [[William H. Cade]]
* [[Sean B. Carroll]]
* [[Brian Charlesworth]]
* [[Deborah Charlesworth]]
* [[Bryan Clarke]]
* [[Jerry Coyne]]
* [[James Crow]]
* [[Charles Darwin]]
* [[Richard Dawkins]]
* [[Jared Diamond]]
* [[Theodosius Dobzhansky]]
* [[Niles Eldredge]]
* [[Ronald Fisher|R. A. Fisher]]
* [[E.B. Ford|Edmund Brisco Ford]]
* [[Stephen Jay Gould]]
* [[Rosemary Grant]]
* [[Ernst Haeckel]]
* [[J. B. S. Haldane]]
* [[W. D. Hamilton|W. D. "Bill" Hamilton]]
* [[Julian Huxley]]
* [[Daniel Janzen]]
* [[Motoo Kimura]]
* [[Alexey Kondrashov]]
* [[James A. Lake]]
* [[Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]]
* [[Richard Levins]]
* [[Richard Lewontin]]
* [[Konrad Lorenz]]
* [[Gustave Malécot]]
* [[Lynn Margulis]]
* [[Pierre Louis Maupertuis]]
* [[Ernst Mayr]]
* [[Ivan Vladimirovich Michurin]]
* [[Hermann Joseph Muller]]
* [[George and Elizabeth Peckham]]
* [[Edward Loranus Rice]]
* [[Barbara A. Schaal]]
* [[John Maynard Smith]]
* [[George Gaylord Simpson]]
* [[Mark G. Thomas]]
* [[Nikolaas Tinbergen]]
* [[Robert Trivers]]
* [[Leigh Van Valen]]
* [[Alfred Russel Wallace]]
* [[August Weismann]]
* [[George C. Williams]]
* [[Allan Wilson]]
* [[Edward Osborne Wilson]]
* [[Carl Woese]]
* [[Sewall Wright]]
* [[Emile Zuckerkandl]]
</div>

;Evolutionary biologists known for their science popularization
<div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2">
* [[Jerry Coyne]]
* [[Richard Dawkins]]
* [[Jared Diamond]]
* [[Stephen Jay Gould]]
* [[Ernst Haeckel]]
* [[J. B. S. Haldane]]
* [[Richard Lewontin]]
* [[Kenneth R. Miller]]
* [[Mark Ridley]]
* [[Colin Tudge]]
</div>

;Notable popularizers of evolution whose research isn't primarily concerned with evolutionary biology
<div style="column-count:2;-moz-column-count:2;-webkit-column-count:2">
* [[Robert Ardrey]]
* [[Peter Atkins]]
* [[Daniel Dennett]]
* [[Greg Graffin]]
* [[Christopher Hitchens]]
* [[Steven Pinker]]
* [[Matt Ridley]]
* [[Michael Ruse]]
* [[Carl Sagan]]
</div>

== Bibliography ==
=== Textbooks ===
* [[Douglas J. Futuyma]], ''Evolutionary Biology (3rd Edition)'', Sinauer Associates (1998) ISBN 0-87893-189-9
* Douglas J. Futuyma, ''Evolution'', Sinauer Associates (2005) ISBN 0-87893-187-2
* [[Mark Ridley (zoologist)|Mark Ridley]], ''Evolution (3rd edition)'', Blackwell (2003) ISBN 1-4051-0345-0
* [[Scott R. Freeman]] and [[Jon C. Herron]], ''Evolutionary Analysis'', Prentice Hall (2003) ISBN 0-13-101859-0
* [[Michael R. Rose]] and [[Laurence D. Mueller]], ''Evolution and Ecology of the Organism'', Prentice Hall (2005) ISBN 0-13-010404-3
* [[Monroe W. Strickberger]], ''Evolution (3rd Edition)'', Jones & Bartlett Publishers (2000) ISBN 0-7637-1066-0

=== Notable monographs and other works ===
{{Main|:List of publications in biology}}

* [[Jean-Baptiste Lamarck]] (1809) ''[[Philosophie Zoologique]]''
* [[Charles Darwin]] (1859) ''[[The Origin of Species]]''
* [[Charles Darwin]] (1871) ''[[The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex]]''
* [[Ronald Fisher|R. A. Fisher]] (1930) ''[[The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection]]''
* [[J. B. S. Haldane]] (1932) ''[[The Causes of Evolution]]''
* [[Ernst Mayr]] (1941) ''[[Systematics and the Origin of Species]]''
* [[Conrad Hal Waddington]] (1957) ''The Strategy of the Genes''
* [[Susumu Ohno]] (1970) ''[[Evolution by gene duplication]]''
* [[Richard Dawkins]] (1976) ''[[The Selfish Gene]]''
* [[Richard Dawkins]] (2004) ''[[The Ancestor's Tale]]''
* [[John Maynard Smith]] (1982) ''[[Evolution and the Theory of Games]]''
* [[Motoo Kimura]] (1983) ''[[The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (monograph)|The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution]]''
* [[Stephen Jay Gould]] (2002) ''[[The Structure of Evolutionary Theory]]''

== Topics in evolutionary biology ==
* [[Fitness landscape]]
* [[Foster's rule]]
* [[Koinophilia]]
* [[List of evolutionary biology topics|List of other evolutionary biology topics]]
* [[Muller's ratchet]]
* [[Mutational meltdown]]

== Relationship to other biological disciplines ==
{{Structure of evolutionary biology}}

== See also ==
{{Portal|Evolutionary biology}}
* [[Artificial selection]]
* [[Computational phylogenetics]]
* [[Dominant group (evolutionary biology)]]
* [[Evolution of dietary antioxidants]]
* [[Evolutionary ecology]]
* [[Evolutionary physiology]]
* [[Evolutionary tree]]
* [[Experimental evolution]]
* [[Genetics]]
* [[Paleontology]]
* [[Phylogenetic comparative methods]]
* [[Phylogenetics]]
* [[Quantitative genetics]]
* [[Selective breeding]]
* [[Sexual selection]]
* [[Systematics]]
* [[Evolutionary dynamics]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

{{Biology nav}}

{{evolution}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Evolutionary Biology}}
[[Category:Evolutionary biology| ]]

[[ar:علم الأحياء التطوري]]
[[bn:বিবর্তনীয় জীববিজ্ঞান]]
[[zh-min-nan:Ián-hoà seng-bu̍t-ha̍k]]
[[bg:Еволюционна биология]]
[[ca:Biologia evolutiva]]
[[cs:Evoluční biologie]]
[[da:Evolutionsbiologi]]
[[et:Evolutsioonibioloogia]]
[[el:Εξελικτική βιολογία]]
[[es:Biología evolutiva]]
[[fr:Biologie de l'évolution]]
[[ko:진화생물학]]
[[id:Biologi evolusioner]]
[[it:Biologia evolutiva]]
[[mk:Еволутивна биологија]]
[[nl:Evolutiebiologie]]
[[ja:進化生物学]]
[[no:Evolusjonsbiologi]]
[[nov:Evolutional biologia]]
[[pl:Biologia ewolucyjna]]
[[pt:Biologia evolutiva]]
[[sq:Biologjia evolucionike]]
[[sk:Evolučná biológia]]
[[sl:Evolucijska biologija]]
[[sv:Evolutionsbiologi]]
[[tl:Ebolusyonaryong biyolohiya]]
[[tr:Evrimsel biyoloji]]
[[ur:ارتقائی حیاتیات]]
[[zh:演化生物学]]

Revision as of 01:46, 10 December 2011

Graphical representation of the modern "Tree of Life on the Web" project.

Evolutionary biology is a sub-field of biology concerned with the origin of species from a common descent and descent of species, as well as their change, multiplication and diversity over time. Someone who studies evolutionary biology is known as an evolutionary biologist. To philosopher Kim Sterelny, "the development of evolutionary biology since 1858 is one of the great intellectual achievements of science".[1]

Description

Evolutionary biology is an interdisciplinary field, in that it includes scientists from a wide range of both field and lab oriented disciplines. For example, it generally includes scientists who may have a specialist training in particular organisms such as mammalogy, ornithology, or herpetology, but use those organisms as case studies to answer general questions in evolution. It also generally includes paleontologists and geologists who use fossils to answer questions about the tempo and mode of evolution, as well as theoreticians in areas such as population genetics and evolutionary psychology. Experimentalists have used selection in Drosophila to develop an understanding of the evolution of aging, and experimental evolution is a very active subdiscipline.

In the 1990s developmental biology made a re-entry into evolutionary biology, from its initial exclusion from the modern synthesis, through the study of evolutionary developmental biology.

Findings from evolutionary biology feed strongly into new disciplines that study mankind's sociocultural evolution and evolutionary behavior. Evolutionary biology's frameworks of ideas and conceptual tools are now finding application in the study of a range of subjects from computing to nanotechnology. It also contributes to the field of evolutionary medicine.[2][3]

Artificial life is a sub-field of bioinformatics that attempts to model, or even recreate, the evolution of organisms as described by evolutionary biology. Usually this is done through mathematics and computer models.

History

Evolutionary biology as an academic discipline in its own right emerged as a result of the modern evolutionary synthesis in the 1930s and 1940s.[4] It was not until the 1970s and 1980s, however, that a significant number of universities had departments that specifically included the term evolutionary biology in their titles. In the United States, as a result of the rapid growth of molecular and cell biology, many universities have split (or aggregated) their biology departments into molecular and cell biology-style departments and ecology and evolutionary biology-style departments (which often have subsumed older departments in paleontology, zoology and the like).

Microbiology has recently developed into an evolutionary discipline. It was originally ignored due to the paucity of morphological traits and the lack of a species concept in microbiology. Now, evolutionary researchers are taking advantage of our extensive understanding of microbial physiology, the ease of microbial genomics, and the quick generation time of some microbes to answer evolutionary questions. Similar features have led to progress in viral evolution, particularly for bacteriophages.

Current research

Current research in evolutionary biology covers diverse topics, as should be expected given the centrality of evolution to understanding biology. Modern evolutionary biology incorporates ideas from diverse areas of science, such as molecular genetics and even computer science.

First, some fields of evolutionary research try to explain phenomena that were poorly accounted for by the work of the modern evolutionary synthesis. These phenomena include speciation[5], the evolution of sexual reproduction[6], the evolution of cooperation, the evolution of ageing, and evolvability[7].

Second, biologists ask the most straightforward evolutionary question: "what happened and when?". This includes fields such as paleobiology, as well as systematics and phylogenetics.

Third, the modern evolutionary synthesis was devised at a time when nobody understood the molecular basis of genes. Today, evolutionary biologists try to determine the genetic architecture of interesting evolutionary phenomena such as adaptation and speciation. They seek answers to questions such as how many genes are involved, how large are the effects of each gene, to what extent are the effects of different genes interdependent, what sort of function do the genes involved tend to have, and what sort of changes tend to happen to them (e.g. point mutations vs. gene duplication or even genome duplication). Evolutionary biologists try to reconcile the high heritability seen in twin studies with the difficulty in finding which genes are responsible for this heritability using genome-wide association studies.[8]

One challenge in studying genetic architecture is that the classical population genetics that catalyzed the modern evolutionary synthesis needs to be updated to take into account modern molecular knowledge. This requires a great deal of mathematical development, in order to relate DNA sequence data to evolutionary theory as part of a theory of molecular evolution. For example, biologists try to infer which genes have been under strong selection by detecting selective sweeps.[9]

Fourth, the modern evolutionary synthesis involved agreement about which forces contribute to evolution, but not about their relative importance.[10] Current research seeks to determine this. Evolutionary forces include natural selection, sexual selection, genetic drift, genetic draft, developmental constraints, mutation bias and biogeography.

An evolutionary approach is also key to much current research in biology that does not set out to study evolution per se, especially in organismal biology and ecology. For example, evolutionary thinking is key to life history theory. Annotation of genes and their function relies heavily on comparative, i.e. evolutionary, approaches. The field of evo-devo investigates how developmental processes work by using the comparative method to determine how they evolved.

Notable evolutionary biologists

Notable contributors to evolutionary biology
Evolutionary biologists known for their science popularization
Notable popularizers of evolution whose research isn't primarily concerned with evolutionary biology

Bibliography

Textbooks

  • Douglas J. Futuyma, Evolutionary Biology (3rd Edition), Sinauer Associates (1998) ISBN 0-87893-189-9
  • Douglas J. Futuyma, Evolution, Sinauer Associates (2005) ISBN 0-87893-187-2
  • Mark Ridley, Evolution (3rd edition), Blackwell (2003) ISBN 1-4051-0345-0
  • Scott R. Freeman and Jon C. Herron, Evolutionary Analysis, Prentice Hall (2003) ISBN 0-13-101859-0
  • Michael R. Rose and Laurence D. Mueller, Evolution and Ecology of the Organism, Prentice Hall (2005) ISBN 0-13-010404-3
  • Monroe W. Strickberger, Evolution (3rd Edition), Jones & Bartlett Publishers (2000) ISBN 0-7637-1066-0

Notable monographs and other works

Topics in evolutionary biology

Relationship to other biological disciplines

Template:Structure of evolutionary biology

See also

References

  1. ^ Sterelny, K. (2009). "Philosophy of Evolutionary Thought". Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. p. 313. ISBN 978-0-674-03175-3. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ Evolution and Healing: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. London: Phoenix. 1996. ISBN 1-85799-506-6. {{cite book}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  3. ^ Antolin, M.F. (2009). "Evolutionary Biology of Disease and Darwinian Medicine". Evolution: The First Four Billion Years. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. pp. 281–298. ISBN 978-0-674-03175-3. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Sterelny (2009) p.314
  5. ^ "What is speciation and how should we study it?". American Naturalist. 163 (6): 914–923. 2004. doi:10.1086/386552. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  6. ^ "The evolutionary enigma of sex". American Naturalist. 174 (s1): S1–S14. 2009. doi:10.1086/599084. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  7. ^ "Evolvability as the proper focus of evolutionary developmental biology". Evolution & Development. 9 (4): 393–401. 2007. doi:10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00176.x. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  8. ^ "Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases". Nature. 461 (7265): 747–753. 2009. doi:10.1038/nature08494. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  9. ^ "Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure". Nature. 419 (6909): 832–837. 2002. doi:10.1038/nature01140. PMID 12397357. {{cite journal}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  10. ^ "Progress in evolution and meaning in life". Evolutionary progress. University of Chicago Press. 1988. pp. 49–79. {{cite book}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)