User talk:IntoThinAir

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

I am not an admin. Please do not ask me to delete, restore or protect pages as I cannot do so. This also means that if you are here because you think I deleted an article you created, you are mistaken--I just tagged it for deletion. Instead, check the deletion log to find out who the deleting admin was and contact them.

Orange technology by mcic2011==================================================================

mcic2011: This is not neologism. Please search IEEE Xplorer database by using the keyword "icot" (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?newsearch=true&queryText=icot)

There is concept is not limited to one university (National Cheng Kung Univeristy, Taiwan) only. The second annual conference already took place in Xian, China (please search "ICOT 2014" in Google).

More related reports are here.

• The report at I-Shou University: http://www.isu.edu.tw/upload/81201/76/news/postfile_67371.pdf
• The report at NATIONAL TAIWAN SCIENCE EDUCATION CENTER: www.ntsec.gov.tw/FileAtt.ashx?id=2220
• The report at Tajen University: cs.tajen.edu.tw/ezfiles/26/1026/img/873/1.pdf
• The report at National United University: http://www.nuu.edu.tw/UIPWeb/wSite/ct?xItem=90544&ctNode=9185&mp=23

Besides, the government of Taiwan (Ministry of Science and Technology) already supports the issue. For example,

• http://scitechvista.most.gov.tw/zh-tw/Tags/C/10/1/K2FsaUNjbm5SWW9BLQ==.htm
• http://scitechvista.nsc.gov.tw/zh-tw/Articles/C/0/1/10/1/1611.htm

There are many magazines reporting this concept in Taiwan. If convenient, please search Google and use machine translation [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcic2011 (talk • contribs) 22:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Belle Knox AFD #2

The second AFD for Belle Knox has been overturned and relisted. As you commented on the original AFD, you may wish to comment on this one as well. As there have been developments and sources created since the time of the original AFD, please review to see if your comments/!vote are the same or may have changed. Gaijin42 (talk)

Wikipedia

Dear Jinkinson,

I've noticed that you'd flagged my Zombierella article for removal. I was obviously disappointed, but there's something that you're not understanding. My Zombierella mark, is a federally protected U.S. Trademark; which I myself legally own and is a part of my private company. Prior to filing for this U.S. Trademark, there were no found search results from Google. Once you file a U.S. Trademark, there are law firms; and international mark pirates; all over the world; that are constantly on the hunt for new; and clever marks to which they can steal; or hijack them for themselves. After I filed my mark, future Google search results suddenly begun to proliferate; with other copycats and other wannabes; that'd soon emerged with a battery of supposedly authentic sites; etc.

My company is constantly trying to fight these pirates, and is continually requesting legal takedowns of their infringing material. But I am the only individual in the United States; or the world for that matter; that fully owns the U.S. Trademark and U.S. Copyright; to my created intellectual property. I also have the evidence to prove this; and I'd like to assert my rights and my credits; through Wikipedia; once for all.

There is a legal arsenal in U.S. Trademark law, that the more "famous" entity behind the copied mark; gets to supersede the true owners of the mark; and I will not stand for that. I will protect my federally protected mark; and will not allow myself (or my company); to get boxed into a corner; or have market confusion; because of international pirates; from such far away places; as Russia or China that see an opportunity.

I own my rights 100%. And this is publicly available evidence for anyone to review; or scrutinize; via the U.S. Trademark Office; or the U.S. Copyright Office.

Please be considerate of the rights of owners of intellectual property.

ExHilio (talk) 14:17, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

You might want to read Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. Jinkinson talk to me 14:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Anastasios Tsonis

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Murdering Oscar (And Other Love Songs), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Cooley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Update on the Administration of the College and plans for shifting

Hey, I just updated a few information on the College Page and it is marked for deletion! I merely added a facebook link and a newspaper link as a reference to the fact I mentioned! Help!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samir sharma86 (talk • contribs) 14:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

The problem here isn't the additions you made, it's the fact that there aren't enough independent reliable sources in the article to establish notability for the school. Facebook is not a reliable source, which is why it was removed. Jinkinson talk to me 14:35, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lutefisk (band)

Hello! Your submission of Lutefisk (band) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Serten (talk) 21:16, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Hey

Hello, IntoThinAir. You have new messages at TheUndyingAnchor's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I replied to your message --TheUndyingAnchor (talk) 02:05, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Replied again --TheUndyingAnchor (talk) 02:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:Climate change skeptics

Category:Climate change skeptics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Serten (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Hessle High School 22 October 2014

Hi, apologies for reverting your vandal revert on this one - it only reverted to previous vandalised version, one of a number on this page. I think I've fixed it, for now, by going back to a previous clean version. Acabashi (talk) 12:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

That's fine. I was wondering why this happened and, well, now I know. Jinkinson talk to me 12:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Regnerus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:Thimerosal controversy

Category:Thimerosal controversy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 8chan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 8chan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Jinkinson:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:34, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

think before csd nominating

"Nicholas Alexander Banks born October 2, 1995 is the current wwe world champion and worlds strongest man. he curls 185 raw a world record." asserts notability very clearly so nominating it for deletion with A7 reason (no indication of importance) is wrong.

Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion before nominating any more pages, it's important to get the reason right and use your head before you use your fingers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.128.104.221 (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes, you're right. What I was thinking was that the reviewing admin would see the page and know it was made up, so that meant, in turn, that the person would not be notable. Thanks and I'll try to be more careful in the future (e.g. here I should have tagged it as a hoax). Jinkinson talk to me 15:07, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources Sweet Earth Flower Meghan Trainor Occupational and Environmental Medicine Syrian pound Oral Oncology Mak nyah Cleanup Entourage effect Regulation and prevalence of homeopathy Endocannabinoid system Expand Conchita Wurst Logo of Wikipedia Vehicular communication systems Unencyclopaedic Williams sisters Mental disorder Azadi March

Wikify Yep Roc Records Action Man: 40th Anniversary Homosexuality and psychology Orphan The Ark Church Cell Biochemistry & Function Nocebo (film) Merge Autism Speaks BMC journals Friendship Stub Journal of Neuroscience Research The American Journal of Gastroenterology Arturo González Homerun (EP) Psychosomatic Medicine (journal) Developmental Psychology (journal)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

References Added

Hello Jinkinson,

I've managed to add 3 references for Mohammed Darwish's page. Hope they adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. One more thing, when can I find the page when I google it. It doesn't seem to have been published.

Regards, Mohammedaltattan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammedaltattan (talk • contribs) 15:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

St. Henry District High School

Thanks for that - I thought I was reverting the JESUS thing :) Acabashi (talk) 22:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Notable?

Tap 011. (Not a rhetorical question. I am not that intelligent. :-) Cheers. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:43, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

AFD on John Walsh (Filmmaker)

I was going through some articles that had been tagged by a bot for a WikiProject I'm in and stumbled across the page John Walsh (filmmaker). After wincing at how bad it is and digging through the edit history, I noticed you tagged it for AFD, but I couldn't find a link to the discussion. Can you point me to where that is?

P.S. I'm right now doing an intensive edit on that page to remove a lot of the promotional issues, adding citations, deleting unsourced material etc. So maybe if it passes WP:NOTE it won't be deleted if I can beef it up enough to pass muster. Luthien22 (talk) 21:35, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I didn't tag it for AFD, i tagged it for deletion with a WP:BLPPROD template, so there was no discussion. Now that sources have been added I guess it is not eligible for BLPPROD anymore. Jinkinson talk to me 21:44, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Do you think it would pass AFD in its current state? As I do more edits on it and more research, the more I'm convinced it's not going to pass WP:NOTE no matter what I do. Luthien22 (talk) 18:20, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Actually, it seems like there might be enough RS coverage to survive an AFD. Not just those in the article now, but also in sources like these: [2] [3] [4] Jinkinson talk to me 21:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Whoa, thanks for the sources! I'll definitely incorporate them. Luthien22 (talk) 04:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

SPI

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bristolbottom Andy Dingley (talk) 20:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Request

"A 2014 meta-analysis found that there was not enough evidence to prove that acupuncture was an effective treatment for fibromyalgia.[111]" I request you delete your recent addition. I just expanded the section. See Acupuncture#Rheumatological conditions.

The impact factor is O.59[5] according to ResearchGate. A low-quality fringe journal is unnecessary when the section has better sources. QuackGuru (talk) 19:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

ask for undelete

Hello and thanks for commenting the article, I am sorry that I can not get the meaning of the debate on list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. and the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions , so is that I need to add

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Janicefsc (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC) on the article title and it;s fine? Please give me more advice as it will be pleased if I can post the article, and please undelete the article.Janicefsc (talk) 20:36, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

No, that's not what that means. You should not add that to the article, it is just a way of organizing deletion discussions. The article itself has not been deleted yet, but if you want to keep it from being deleted you should add reliable sources that discuss this food to the article. Jinkinson talk to me 18:46, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for 2014 Jefferson County Public Schools protests

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Jinkinson, did you forget you had nominated 2014 Colorado student protests for DYK? The reviewer apparently didn't notice you had subsequently redirected it to Columbine High School protests, which was later moved to the present title. I have just given credit for the DYK to the others involved in the present article, which as you may have noticed was created earlier the same day as your version. Redirecting your article was a wise and generous thing to do, but if you hadn't forgotten about the DYK nomination, you should have then noted there that you had redirected it and that the creator and substantial editors of that article should be credited. Please do that if something like this happens again. Yngvadottir (talk) 05:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

GLUM (band)

Hey, you were right to remove the speedy tag because the creator had mistakenly copied it when he recreated the article. And I mistakenly thought that someone else had nominated it after I deleted it the first time. Anyway, I've undone your change and nominated it myself. This is just a heads up in case you're confused by the history. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Epigenetics (journal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BIOBASE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Lutefisk (band)

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

My new account

Although a non-admin considering your interest in my new account could I use it for security purposes like editing from a library or could that be mis-interpreted? Jack Stamps (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I think that's okay as per WP:SOCK#LEGIT. You should ask an admin, though. Everymorning talk to me 00:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Jack Stamps (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

2014 sterilisation deaths in India

Hey good edits and content addition. Just a heads up to use Indin English in the article ;)Lihaas (talk) 23:44, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Insufficient paraphrasing

Your addition to Astrology and science has been removed or altered, as it appears to closely paraphrase a copyrighted source. Limited close paraphrasing or quotation is appropriate within reason, so long as the material is clearly attributed in the text. However, longer paraphrases which are not attributed to their source may constitute copyright violation or plagiarism, and are not acceptable on Wikipedia. Such content cannot be hosted here for legal reasons; please do not upload it. You may use external websites or printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If you own the copyright to the text, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the copyright but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Specifically. the text you added contains sentence fragments copied and pasted from both articles you used as a source., Second Quantization (talk) 21:54, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews

Hello IntoThinAir. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

East Van Cross: Buildings and structures?

The article is about the symbol, one example of which is as a particular monument. I actually thought about what categories were good and came up empty.

• So it's not a structure? OK, from what I gathered it looked like it was a sculpture of some sort. But you're right it's just a symbol, not a sculpture, so i'll remove the category. Thanks for pointing that out to me.Everymorning talk to me 03:33, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

George Pajon Entry

Hello Everymorning! Thanks for your contribution on the George Pajon wiki entry. Someone by the handle LuckyLouie desires to have that page deleted. Could you add your opinion please? Thank you! --HafizHanif (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Brand new

http://aop.sagepub.com/content/48/11/1502 QuackGuru (talk) 23:31, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seven Decades, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmie Rodgers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

The text passed V

See "Read "...no long- term data demonstrating that e-cigarettes are a “ healthier alternative.”" Before you made your edit I provided verification in my edit summary. The text is sourced. QuackGuru (talk) 03:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

• Do you mean it's in the abstract? Because if so, it seems to me that the conclusion you are drawing from the paper and putting in the article is WP:OR, which is why I said it doesn't seem to be explicitly stated in the Drummond article. The article doesn't explicitly say that there's no long-term data that e-cigarettes are a healthier alternative. An alternative phrasing that I personally would like better would be "...no long-term data regarding the carcinogenic effects of e-cigarettes, or regarding their effects on lung function." Everymorning talk to me 03:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • NVM, Yobol has just undone my edit, and it appears it's not in the abstract after all, meaning I couldn't read it as it is paywalled. Please disregard my removal of the content in question. Everymorning talk to me 03:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)