Germanic peoples: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:29, 17 January 2020

The Germanic peoples (Template:Lang-lat^[a]), were a collection of ethnic groups of continental Northern European origin, identified by Roman-era authors as distinct from neighbouring Celtic peoples. They are also called Teutonic, Suebian, or Gothic peoples in older literature, though the latter two terms are now mainly used to refer to specific groups of Germanic peoples.^[1]

In recent generations the idea that the Germanic peoples originally shared any single core culture or language before their contact with Romans is doubted by historians.^[1] On the other hand, during the Roman era several large Germanic groups, such as the Suebians in the west and Goths in the east, were described by ancient authors as entering the region and becoming dominant. They became increasingly dominant in military and political terms, and it is especially these groups who are identified in modern scholarship as speakers, of what are now defined as early "Germanic languages".^[2]^[3] On the other hand, during the Roman era several large Germanic groups, such as the Suebians in the west and Goths in the east, were described by ancient authors as entering the region and becoming dominant. They became increasingly dominant in military and political terms, and it is especially these groups who are identified in modern scholarship as speakers, of what are now defined as early "Germanic languages".^[2]^[3]

It is from Roman authors that the term "Germanic" originated. The decisive victory of Arminius at the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest in 9 CE was a major factor in stopping Roman imperial expansion, and has therefore been considered a turning point in world history.^[b] Germanic tribes did however settle the entire Roman frontier along the Rhine and the Danube, and some established close relations with the Romans, often serving as royal tutors and soldiers, sometimes even rising to the highest offices in the Roman military.

In Eastern Europe, the Goths came to dominate the area which is today the Ukraine, eventually launching sea expeditions into the Balkans, Anatolia, and as far as Cyprus.^[5]^[6]^[7] Goths began to become a major presence in the military of the Eastern Roman Empire, leading to resentment and eventual conflict. The goth Alaric I was a Roman general in the east, who was eventually forced to move his army and its people to the Western Empire, becoming king of a mobile Gothic army in Italy.

The westward expansion of the Huns into the territory of today's Ukraine and the Danubian area in the late 4th century CE pushed, involved many Germanic tribes and led to large population changes, throughout Europe, both inside and outside the empire. This occurred at a moment when the Western Roman Empire was in its last phase, and many of the standing military forces it had were already Germanic, and settled within the empire. Like Alaric's Visigoths, these Romanized armies, who identified themselves under various ethnic designations, took over the rule of many regions. The Visigoths took control of southwestern Gaul and later ruled Iberia. The Anglo-Saxons are first found ruling in southern England, Franks in northern France, and Burgundians in southeastern France.

Of the Germanic kingdoms which emerged, Francia gained a dominant position. This kingdom formed the Holy Roman Empire under the leadership of Charlemagne, who was officially recognized by Pope Leo III in 800 CE. As the new medieval institutions began to unify continental Europe on a less ancestral basis, North Germanic seafarers, commonly referred to as Vikings, embarked on a last massive expansion which led to the establishment of the Duchy of Normandy, Kievan Rus' and settlements in the British Isles and North Atlantic Ocean as far as North America.

Ethnonym

Germani

The term Germani was taken over by the Romans from the Gauls ^[8]^[9]; the etymology and original meaning of the word is however uncertain.

One hypothesis is that it comes from a Celtic word meaning "neighbour", cf. Old Irish gair.^[10]
Another Celtic possibility is that the name meant "noisy"; cf. Breton/Cornish garm "shout", Irish gairm "call".^[11]
Others have proposed a Germanic etymology *gēr-manni, "spear men", cf. Middle Dutch ghere, Old High German Ger, Old Norse geirr.^[12] However, the form gēr (from PGmc *gaizaz) seems too advanced phonetically for the 1st century, has a long vowel where a short one is expected, and the Latin form has a simplex -n-, not a geminate.^{[citation needed]}
Classical writers believed that the origin might be Latin. In Latin the word "germanus" (plural germani) means brother or sibling.

In about 222 BCE, the first use of the Latin term "Germani" is said to have been in the Fasti Capitolini inscription de Galleis Insvbribvs et Germ(aneis), but the record is difficult to interpret and may even be falsified. This may simply be referring to Gaul or related people; but this may be an inaccurate date, since the inscription was erected in about 18 BCE despite referencing an earlier date. The term Germani shows up again, allegedly written by Poseidonios (from 80 BCE), but is merely a quotation inserted by the author Athenaios who wrote much later (around 190 CE).^[13]

The first surviving detailed discussions of Germani are those of Julius Caesar, whose memoirs are based on first-hand experience, but were also intended as a political document to explain his expensive and dangerous actions in far-away countries. Within these explanations, the Germani are described as dangerous to Gaul and therefore Rome, being a constant pressure upon the Gaulish Belgae and Helvetians. There are reasons to think that Caesar twisted the terminology to suit these aims, in ways which had a permanent impact on later writers. Hence Caesar may have been the first to define the Rhine as the defensible boundary between Gauls and Germani. However, he also made it clear that the Rhine boundary had not been the historical boundary between Gauls and Germani, with the Helvetians having lived east of the Rhine, and several Germani tribes living west of the lower Rhine among the Belgae.^{[citation needed]}

Later classical authors followed Caesar and came to use the term Germania as an vaguely defined, large geographical and cultural region, extending far into eastern Europe, though Celtic peoples continued living east of the Rhine and north of the Alps.^{[citation needed]} Tacitus and others noted differences of culture which could be found on the east of the Rhine. But the abstract theme they continued to follow was that of Caesar: this was a wild and dangerous region, less civilized than Gaul, a place that required additional military vigilance.^[14]

As mentioned above, Caesar also used the term Germani for a very specific tribal grouping in northeastern Belgic Gaul, west of the Rhine, the largest part of whom were the Eburones. He made clear that he was using the name in the local sense. These are the so-called Germani Cisrhenani, whom Caesar believed to be closely related to the peoples east of the Rhine, and descended from immigrants into Gaul.^[15] Tacitus suggests that this was the original meaning of the word "Germani" – as the name of a single tribal nation west of the Rhine, ancestral to the Tungri (who lived in the same area as the earlier Germani reported by Caesar), and not the name of a whole race (gens) as it came to mean. However, Tacitus adds that in due time, the name Germani "gradually acquired a wider usage" and that "once they had got to know the name, they all called themselves Germani."^[16] Caesar described this group of tribes both as Belgic Gauls and as Germani. Gauls are associated with Celtic languages, and the term Germani is associated with Germanic languages, but Caesar did not discuss languages in detail (though he did say that Belgic Gaul was different from Celtic Gaul in language).^{[citation needed]} The geographer Ptolemy described the place where these people lived as Germania, which according to his accounts was bordered by the Rhine, Vistula and Danube Rivers, but he also circumscribed into Greater Germania an area which included Jutland (Cimbrian peninsula) and an enormous island known as Scandia (the Scandinavian peninsula).^[17]

While saying that the Germani had ancestry across the Rhine, Caesar did not describe these tribes as recent immigrants, saying that they had defended themselves some generations earlier from the invading Cimbri and Teutones. (He thereby distinguished them from the neighbouring Aduatuci, whom he did not call Germani, but who were descended from those Cimbri and Teutones.)^[18] It has been claimed, for example by Maurits Gysseling, that the place names of this region show evidence of an early presence of Germanic languages, as early as the 2nd century BCE.^[19] The Celtic culture and language were however clearly influential also, as can be seen in the tribal name of the Eburones, their kings' names, Ambiorix and Cativolcus, and also the material culture of the region.^[20]^[c]

The term Germani, therefore, probably applied to a small group of tribes in northeastern Gaul who may or may not have spoken a Germanic language, and whose links to Germania are unclear. It appears that the Germanic tribes did not have a word to describe themselves, although the word Suebi, used by Caesar to broadly classify Germanic speakers, was likely Germanic in origin.^[d]

Early Germanic peoples used the term walhaz to describe outsiders (mainly Celts, Romans and Greeks).^[21]^{[better source needed]} Roman authors frequently employed the term "barbarian" from the Latin derivative barbarus (inherited from the Greek barbaros which means "foreign") when describing Germanic peoples. Such a term presupposed a distinctive Roman intellectual and cultural superiority and their ethnographic treatises on the various barbarian tribes ascribed specific attributes of barbarism to each one so as to delineate the dichotomy between barbarism and civilization.^[22] The more the Romans increased their presence along the periphery of their Empire, the more trade and employment for the barbarians became available, resulting in an economic boom along the corridors of the Danube River, which subsequently increased the Roman focus upon the Germanic peoples.^[23]

Use of the modern term German or Germanic is the result of 18th and 19th century classical philology which "envisioned the Germanic language group as occupying a central branch of the Indo-European language tree."^[24]

Teutons

Latin scholars of the 10th century used the adjective teutonicus (a derivative of Teutones) when referencing East Francia, which in their vernacular was connoted "Regnum Teutonicum", for that area and all of its subsequent inhabitants. Modern speakers of English still use the word "Teutons" to describe Germanic peoples.^[21]^{[better source needed]}

Historically, the Teutones were only one specific tribe, and may not even have spoken a Germanic language. For example, some scholars postulate that the original Teutonic language may have been a form of Celtic.^[25] The source of this confusion, whereby Teutons are lumped into the same category as German-speaking tribes, comes from their contact with the Romans in the 2nd century BCE, when they, along with the Cimbri and the Ambrones, led a frightening attack against the Romans.^{[citation needed]}

Teuton was the byword the Romans applied to the barbarians from the north and which they used to describe subsequent Germanic peoples.^[26] Under the leadership of Gaius Marius, who built his career on barbarian antagonists (like many who followed), the Teutones became one of the archetypal enemies of the Roman Republic.^[27]

Subdivisions

By the 1st century CE, the writings of Pomponius Mela, Pliny the Elder, and Tacitus indicate a division of Germanic peoples into large groupings who shared ancestry and culture. This division has been appropriated in modern terminology describing the divisions of Germanic languages.^{[citation needed]}

Tacitus, in his Germania, wrote that:

In the ancient songs...they celebrate Tuisto, an earth-born god. To him they attribute a son, Mannus, the forefather and founder of their people, and to Mannus three sons, after whom were named the Ingvaeones, nearest to the Ocean, the Herminones in the interior, and the remainder Istvaeones.^[16]

Tacitus described the Germanic people as ethnically uniform or "unmixed" with "a distinct character" and he even generalized them by claiming that "a family likeness pervades the whole." He also reported that the peoples of Germany have fierce blue eyes, red hair, and large bodies" that rendered them capable of "violent" outbursts, unable to tolerate heat or thirst but well accustomed to the cold.^[28]

Tacitus also specifies that the Suebi are a very large grouping, with many tribes within it, with their own names. The largest, he says, is the Semnones, who he says, "claim that they are the oldest and the noblest of the Suebi."^[29] He goes on to remark that the Langobardi are fewer, but despite being "surrounded by many mighty peoples" they managed to defend themselves "not by submissiveness but by battle and boldness; and in remoter and better defended areas live the Reudigni, Aviones, Anglii, Varini, Eudoses, the Suardones, and Nuithones.^[30]

Pliny the Elder, on the other hand, names five races of Germans in his Historia Naturalis, not three, by distinguishing the two more easterly blocks of Germans, the Vandals and further east the Bastarnae, who were the first to reach the Black Sea and come into contact with Greek civilization. He is also slightly more specific about the position of the Istvaeones, though he also does not name any examples of them:

There are five German races; the Vandili, parts of whom are the Burgundiones, the Varini, the Carini, and the Gutones: the Ingævones, forming a second race, a portion of whom are the Cimbri, the Teutoni, and the tribes of the Chauci. The Istævones, who join up to the Rhine, and to whom the Cimbri [sic, repeated] belong, are the third race; while the Hermiones, forming a fourth, dwell in the interior, and include the Suevi, the Hermunduri, the Chatti, the Cherusci,^[e] and the Peucini, who are also the Basternæ, adjoining the Daci. The remote Varini are listed by Tacitus as being in the Suebic or Hermionic group by Tacitus, above, but by Pliny in the eastern Vandalic or Gothic group, so the two accounts do not match perfectly.^[32]

These accounts and others from the period often emphasize that the Suebi and their Hermione kin formed an especially large and mobile nation, which at the time were living mainly near the Elbe, both east and west of it, but they were also moving westwards into the lands near the Roman frontier. Pomponius Mela in his slightly earlier Description of the World, places "the farthest people of Germania, the Hermiones" somewhere to the east of the Cimbri and the Teutones, and further from Rome, apparently on the Baltic.^[f] Strabo however describes the Suebi as going through a period where they were pushed back east by the Romans, in the direction from which they had come:

the nation of the Suevi is the most considerable, as it extends from the Rhine as far as the Elbe, and even a part of them, as the Hermonduri and the Langobardi, inhabit the country beyond the Elbe; but at the present time these tribes, having been defeated, have retired entirely beyond the Elbe.^[33]

By the end of the 5th century the term "Gothic" was used more generally in the historical sources for Pliny's "Vandals" to the east of the Elbe, including not only the Goths and Vandals, but also "the Gepids along the Tisza and the Danube, the Rugians, Sciri and Burgundians, even the Iranian Alans."^[21]^{[better source needed]}

History

Origins

The Proto-Germanic-speaking population is believed to have emerged during the Nordic Bronze Age, which developed out of the Battle Axe culture in southern Scandinavia.^[34] During the Iron Age various Germanic tribes began a southward expansion. In western Europe, where this is best attested, this was at the expense of Celtic peoples, and led to centuries of sporadic violent conflict with ancient Rome.

The earliest sites at which Germanic-speaking peoples per se have been documented are in Northern Europe, in what now constitutes the plains of Denmark and southern Sweden. However, in even this region, the population had been, according to Waldman & Mason, "remarkably stable" – as far back as Neolithic times, when humans first began controlling their environment through the use of agriculture and the domestication of animals.^[35] Given this stability, the population of the region necessarily preceded the arrival in Europe of the precursors of the Germanic languages – which most likely began with the Corded Ware culture.^{[citation needed]}

Archaeological and linguistic evidence from a period known as the Nordic Bronze Age indicates that a common material culture existed between the Germanic tribes that inherited the southern regions of Scandinavia, along with the Schleswig-Holstein area and the area of what is now Hamburg, Germany.^[36] During the 2nd millennium BCE, the Nordic Bronze Age expanded eastward into the adjacent regions between the estuaries of the Elbe and Oder rivers.^[37] Additional archaeological remnants from the Iron Age society that once existed in nearby Wessenstedt also show traces of this culture.^[2] Exactly how these cultures interacted remains a mystery but the migrations of early proto-Germanic peoples are discernible from the remaining evidence of prehistoric cultures in Hügelgräber, Urnfield, and La Tene.^{[citation needed]}

Climatic change between 850 BCE and 760 BCE in Scandinavia and "a later and more rapid one around 650 BCE might have triggered migrations to the coast of eastern Germany and further toward the Vistula.^[21]^{[better source needed]}

The cultural phase of the late Bronze Age and early Iron Age in Europe (c. 1200–600 BCE in temperate continental areas), known in contemporary terms as the Hallstatt culture expanded from the south into this area and brought the early Germanic peoples under the influence of early Celtic (or pre Celtic) culture between 1200 BCE and 600 BCE, whereupon they began extracting bog iron from the available ore in peat bogs. This ushered in the Pre-Roman Iron Age.^[21]^{[better source needed]} Stretching from central France all the way to western Hungary and then from the Alps to central Poland, the Hallstatt culture also constructed sophisticated structures and the archaeological remains across parts of France, Germany and Hungary suggest their trade networks along the North Atlantic, Baltic Sea and up and down central Europe's river valleys were fairly elaborate as well.^[38]

As early as 750 BCE, archeological evidence gives the impression that the proto-Germanic population was becoming more uniform in its culture.^[21]^{[better source needed]} The Germanic peoples at the time inhabited southern Scandinavia and the Northern Sea and Baltic coasts from modern-day Netherlands to the Vistula.^[39] As this population grew, it migrated south-west, into coastal floodplains due to the exhaustion of the soil in its original settlements.^[40]

Early Iron Age

By approximately 250 BCE, additional expansion further southwards into central Europe had begun to take place and five general groups of Germanic people emerged, each employing distinct linguistic dialects but sharing similar language innovations — they are distinguished from one another as: North Germanic in southern Scandinavia; North Sea Germanic in the regions along the North Sea and in the Jutland peninsula NW Europe, which forms the mainland of Denmark together with the north German state of Schleswig-Holstein; Weser-Rhine Germanic along the middle Rhine and Weser river (which empties into the North Sea near Bremerhaven); Elbe Germanic spoken by the people living directly along the middle Elbe river; and East Germanic between the middle of the Oder and the Vistula rivers.^[g]

Concomitantly, during the 2nd century BCE the advent of the Celts of Halstatt and La Tene arose in nearby territories further west but the interactions between the early Germanic people and the Celts is thought to have been minimal based on the linguistic evidence.^[41] Despite the absence of the Celtic influence further eastwards, there are a number of Celtic loanwords in Proto-Germanic, which at the very least indicates contact between the people of Gaul and the early Germanic cultures that resided along the Rhine river.^[42] Nonetheless, material objects such as metal ornaments and pottery found near the areas east of the lower Rhine are connoted as Jastorf in nomenclature and are characteristically distinguishable from the Celtic objects found further west.^[43]

It is not clear if the first occurrence of the term Germani in Roman ethnography is either a reference to Germanic or Celtic according to modern linguists, but it is probable that the clear geographic demarcation appearing between the two peoples may have been made for the sake of political convenience by Caesar.^[44] Caesar described some tribes more distinctly than others but generally considered most of them as being from Germanic stock.^{[citation needed]}

Archaeological evidence in some of the regions creates an ethnographic problem in clearly delineating the indigenous people based strictly on Roman classification. Nonetheless, there are scholars who assert that there was an eventual linguistic "Germanization" that occurred during the 1st century BCE through something they call the "elite-dominance" model.^[45] Archaeologists are unable to make definitive judgments which accord the observations of the Roman writer Tacitus. Enough cultural absorption between the various Germanic people occurred that geographically defining the extent of pre-Roman Germanic territory is nearly impossible from a classification standpoint.^[46]

Some recognizable trends in the archaeological records exist, as it is known that, generally, West Germanic people while still migratory, were more geographically settled, whereas the East Germanic peoples remained transitory for a longer period.^[47]

Three settlement patterns and solutions come to the fore, the first of which is the establishment of an agricultural base in a region which allowed them to support larger populations; second, the Germanic peoples periodically cleared forests to extend the range of their pasturage; thirdly (and the most frequent occurrence), they often emigrated to other areas as they exhausted the immediately available resources.^[48]

War and conquest followed as the Germanic people migrated bringing them into direct conflict with the Celts who were forced to either Germanize or migrate elsewhere as a result. Evidence suggest that these were Germanized rather than displaced.^[49]

West Germanic peoples eventually settled in central Europe and became more accustomed to agriculture and it is those people that are described by Caesar and Tacitus. Meanwhile, the East Germanic people continued their migratory habits.^[50]

Roman writers characteristically organized and classified people and it may very well have been deliberate on their part to recognize the tribal distinctions of the various Germanic people so as to pick out known leaders and exploit these differences for their benefit. For the most part however, these early Germanic people shared a basic culture, operated similarly from an economic perspective, and were not nearly as differentiated as the Romans implied.^{[citation needed]}

Germanic tribes are hard to distinguish from the Celts on many accounts simply based on archaeological records.^[51]

Earliest contacts

Pytheas

One of the earliest known written records of the Germanic world in classical times was in the lost work of Pytheas.

Pytheas traveled to Northern Europe, some time in the late 4th century BCE, and his observations about the geographical environment, traditions and culture of the northern European populations became a central source of information for later historians – often the only source.^[h] Authors such as Strabo, Pliny and Diodorus cite Pytheas in disbelief, although Pytheas' observations appear to have been accurate. Though Pytheas was not the first Mediterranean to explore those lands (note for example Himilco (5th century BCE), and possibly Phoenicians and Tartessians (c. 6th century BCE), his became the first substantial surviving description of these populations.^{[citation needed]}

Much of the Germanic peoples' early history enters into view through Pytheas, particularly since he was also possibly the first to distinguish the Germanoi people of northern and central Europe as distinct from the Keltoi people further west.^[52]^[53] Along with the records of a couple of other classical writers (namely Polybius (2nd century BCE) and Posidonius (c. 135 BCE – c. 51 BCE), the work of Pytheas on the Celts and early Germans influenced scores of future geographers, historians and ethnographers.^[54]

Bastarnae, the bravest nation of all^[55]

— Appian

Migrations of the Bastarnae and Scirii

An early Germanic people known as the Bastarnae were identified by Roman authors and were allegedly the first to reach the Greco-Roman world, living in the area north of the Danube's mouth in the Black Sea. They resided primarily in the territory east of the Carpathian Mountains between the Dniester River valley and the delta of the Danube in what is now the Ukraine, Moldova and Romania and are considered the easternmost of the Germanic tribes.^[56] The Bastarnae are mentioned in historical sources going back as far as the 3rd century BCE all the way through the 4th century CE.^[57]

In 201–202 BCE, the Macedonians under the leadership of King Philip V, conscripted the Bastarnae as soldiers to fight against the Roman Republic in the Second Macedonian War.^[56] They remained a presence in that area until late in the Roman Empire while some settled on Peuce Island at the mouth of the Danube on the Black Sea which is why the name Peucini is also associated with the Bastarnae.^[56] King Perseus enlisted the service of the Bastarnae in 171–168 BCE to fight the Third Macedonian War. By 29 BCE, they were subdued by the Romans and those that remained began merging with various tribes of Goths into the second century CE.^[56]

Historian Thomas Burns references the Bastarnae but only as an aside from the Latin poet Claudian, claiming that they were among "the oldest of the various Scythian people".^[58] Burns further elaborates in stating that there are no "specific references" to the Bastarnae and that remarks about them by Claudian and later third century writers "must give us pause" for the mention of such people might merely have been a "convenient poetic device."^[58] Historian Peter Heather disagrees with this position and identifies the Bastarnae as one of the Germanic tribes and asserts that they once "dominated substantial tracts of territory at the mouth of the Danube."^[59] Along similar lines, the late classical scholar, Theodor Mommsen, recognized the Bastarnae and placed them in the geographic regions of Moldavia and Bessarabia during the reign of Tiberius.^[60]^[i] This is the same region where Tacitus placed them.^[61] Another historian of antiquity, J. B. Bury, counted the Bastarnae along with the Goths, Vandals, Gepids, Burgundians, Lombards, Rugians, Heruls and Scirii among the East Germanic peoples.^[62]

Cimbrian War

Late in the 2nd century BCE, Roman sources recount the migrations of the Cimbri, Teutones and Ambrones into Gaul, Italy and Hispania. This cultural confrontation resulted in the Cimbrian War between the Roman Republic and the Germanic tribes; particularly those of the Roman Consul under Gaius Marius.^[21]^{[better source needed]}

The Cimbri crossed into Noricum (Austria) in 113 BCE looking for food and usable land when they confronted and defeated a Roman army at the Battle of Noreia. A combined force of Cimbri^[j] and Teutoni squared off against additional armies from Rome in 107 (Battle of Burdigala, 105 (Battle of Arausio) and 102 BCE (Battle of Tridentum), vanquishing them in the process.^[63] Their further incursions into Roman Italy were thrust back by the Romans at the Battle of Aquae Sextiae in 102 BCE, and the Battle of Vercellae in 101 BCE.^[64]

Encounter with Julius Caesar

Earlier Germanic invasions were written up by Caesar and others as presaging of a danger for the Roman Republic, a danger that should be controlled.^[65]

Julius Caesar describes the Germani and their customs in his Commentarii de Bello Gallico, though in certain cases it is still a matter of debate if he refers to Northern Celtic tribes or clearly identified Germanic tribes. Caesar notes that the Gauls had earlier dominated and sent colonies into the lands of the Germans, but that the Gauls had since degenerated under the influence of Roman civilization, and now considered themselves inferior in military prowess.^[k]^[l]

[The Germani] have neither Druids to preside over sacred offices, nor do they pay great regard to sacrifices. They rank in the number of the gods those alone whom they behold, and by whose instrumentality they are obviously benefited, namely, the sun, fire, and the moon; they have not heard of the other deities even by report. Their whole life is occupied in hunting and in the pursuits of the military art; from childhood they devote themselves to fatigue and hardships. Those who have remained chaste for the longest time, receive the greatest commendation among their people; they think that by this the growth is promoted, by this the physical powers are increased and the sinews are strengthened. And to have had knowledge of a woman before the twentieth year they reckon among the most disgraceful acts; of which matter there is no concealment, because they bathe promiscuously in the rivers and [only] use skins or small cloaks of deer's hides, a large portion of the body being in consequence naked.

^{[citation needed]}

They do not pay much attention to agriculture, and a large portion of their food consists in milk, cheese, and flesh; nor has any one a fixed quantity of land or his own individual limits; but the magistrates and the leading men each year apportion to the tribes and families, who have united together, as much land as, and in the place in which, they think proper, and the year after compel them to remove elsewhere. For this enactment they advance many reasons-lest seduced by long-continued custom, they may exchange their ardor in the waging of war for agriculture; lest they may be anxious to acquire extensive estates, and the more powerful drive the weaker from their possessions; lest they construct their houses with too great a desire to avoid cold and heat; lest the desire of wealth spring up, from which cause divisions and discords arise; and that they may keep the common people in a contented state of mind, when each sees his own means placed on an equality with [those of] the most powerful.^[68]

Caesar was wary of these barbaric people of Germania and invoked the threat of expansions such as that by Ariovistus' Suebi as justification for his brutal campaigns to annex Gaul to Rome in 58–51 BCE.^[69]

An intense Roman militarization, greater than ever before, was begun under Caesar to deal with the barbarian tribes along the frontier — particularly since he feared that the Celtic Gauls between Rome and the Germanic people would not be able to defend themselves.^[70]

One major Celtic people who were forced from their homeland in modern southwest Germany and Bohemia were the Boii, a migration which had major impacts on Rome and many other peoples. Later, Caesar's attention in 58 BCE was drawn to the movements of the Boii's old neighbours the Helvetii, another population group forced into Gaul from the direction of modern southwest Germany and western Switzerland.^[71]^[m] When the Gaulish Arverni and Sequani elicited assistance from the Germanic Suebi (who came to them from east of the Rhine into Gaul) against their Aedui enemies in 71 BCE, the Suebi essentially remained in situ and were able to expand further into the territory along the periphery of the Roman frontier. Meanwhile, Celtic culture and influence in Gaul began to wane during the first century BCE as a result.^[72]

It was Caesar's wars against the Germanic people that helped establish and solidify the use of the term Germania. The initial purpose of the Roman military campaigns was to protect Trans-Alpine Gaul from further incursions of the Germanic tribes by controlling the area between the Rhine and the Elbe.^[73]

Early Roman Empire period

Roman expansion along the Rhine and Danube rivers resulted in the incorporation of many indigenous Celtic societies into the Roman Empire. Lands to the north and east of the Rhine emerge in the Roman records under the name Germania. Population groups from this area had a complex relationship with Rome; sometimes the peoples of Germania were at war with Rome, but at times they established trade relations, symbiotic military alliances, and cultural exchanges with one another.^[74]

Romans made concerted efforts to divide the Germanic tribes when the opportunity presented itself, encouraging intertribal rivalry so as to diminish the threat of an otherwise formidable enemy.^[75] Over the following centuries, the Romans sometimes intervened, but often took advantage as their neighbors slaughtered one another using Roman-influenced techniques of war. More instances of Germani fighting Germani appear in the works of Tacitus than between Romans and Germani.^[76]

In the Augustean period there was—as a result of Roman activity as far as the Elbe River—a first definition of the "Germania magna" from the Rhine and Danube rivers in the West and South to the Vistula and the Baltic Sea in the East and North.^{[citation needed]} In 9 CE, a revolt of their Germanic subjects headed by Arminius resulted in a decisive defeat of Publius Quinctilius Varus and the destruction of three Roman legions in a surprise attack at the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest), which caused withdrawal of the Roman frontier to the Rhine. Occupying Germany had proven costly and Arminius' attack helped bring about the end of 28 years of Roman campaigning across the North European plains.^[77] Both Arminius and another contemporary Germanic warrior king named Maroboduus, attempted to rule these warrior-based peoples in autocratic fashion but were deposed or outright killed through the treachery of other warrior-nobles, who strove for their own glory.^[78]

During the reign of Augustus, Germanic warriors, particularly men of the Batavi, were recruited as personal bodyguards to the Roman emperor, forming the so-called Numerus Batavorum. In 69 AD, the turbulent Year of the Four Emperors, Gaius Julius Civilis, a Roman military officer of Batavian origin, orchestrated the Revolt of the Batavi.^[79] The revolt lasted nearly a year and while it was ultimately unsuccessful,^[80] Civilis managed to evade Roman capture.^{[citation needed]}

"Let Syria, Asia Minor, and the East, habituated as it is to despotism, submit to slavery... Freedom is a gift bestowed by nature even on the dumb animals. Courage is the peculiar excellence of man, and the Gods help the braver side."^[81] - Gaius Julius Civilis

At the end of the 1st century, two provinces west of the Rhine called Germania inferior and Germania superior were established by the Emperor Domitian, having previously been military districts, "so as to separate this more militarized zone from the civilian populations farther west and south".^[82] Important medieval cities like Aachen, Cologne, Trier, Mainz, Worms and Speyer were part of these two "militarized" Roman provinces.

"Neither the Samnites nor the Carthaginians nor Spain nor Gaul nor even the Parthians have taught us more frequent lessons. The freedom of the Germans does indeed show more aggression than the despotism of the Arsacids."^[83] - Tacitus

The Germania by Gaius Cornelius Tacitus, an ethnographic work on the diverse group of Germanic tribes outside of the Roman Empire, is our most important source on the Germanic peoples of the 1st century.^{[citation needed]}

Germanic expansions during early Roman times are known only generally, but it is clear that the forebears of the Goths were settled on the southern Baltic shore by 100 CE.^{[citation needed]}

According to historian Thomas Burns, major hostilities between the external Germanic peoples of the north and Rome did not commence in "earnest" until the reign of Trajan (CE 98—117), who used the "full weight of Roman might" to attack the Dacians.^[84]

There is not upon the Face of the Earth, a bolder, or a more indefatigable Nation than the Germans... [Y]et upon encounter, they are broken and destroyed through their own undiciplined temerity, even by the most effiminate of men^[85]

— Seneca the Younger

In the absence of large-scale political unification, such as that imposed forcibly by the Romans upon the peoples of Italy, the various tribes remained free, led by their own hereditary or chosen leaders. Once Rome faced significant threats on its borders, some of the Germanic tribes who once guarded its periphery chose solace within the Roman empire itself, implying that enough assimilation and cross-cultural pollination had occurred for their societies not only to cooperate, but to live together in some cases.^{[citation needed]}

The 4th century Gothic Thervingi are most famous among scholars of classical Rome and pre-modern Europe because the majority of them sought asylum inside the heart of the Roman Empire in 376 CE.^[86]^[n]

Conflict and co-existence with the Roman Empire

By the middle to late second century CE, migrating Germanic tribes like the Marcomanni and Quadi pushed their way to the Roman frontier along the Danube corridor, movements of people which resulted in conflicts known as the Marcomannic Wars; these conflicts ended in approximately CE 180.^[88]

By the early 3rd century AD, larger confederations of Germanic people appeared, groups led by tribal leaders acting as would-be kings. The first of these conglomerations mentioned in the historical sources were the Alamanni (a term meaning "all men") who appear in Roman texts sometime in the 3rd century CE.^[89] This change indicated that the tribalism of the Germanic people was being abandoned for consolidated rule.^{[citation needed]}

While the Germanic tribes were consolidating and expanding, Rome adapted itself due to the arrival of the Germanic tribes. Emperor Severus Alexander was killed by his own soldiers in CE 235 for example (for negotiating peace with the tribes of Germania through diplomacy and bribery against the wishes of his men) and the general Maximin elected in his place.^{[citation needed]} Maximin was himself not Roman but was ethnically the child of a Germanic Alan and a Goth. Military expediency trumped aristocratic privilege when it came to securing the Empire and a series of professional military emperors followed as a result.^[90]

The first recorded great migration of a Germanic tribe occurred sometime at the end of the 2nd century when the Goths left the lower Vistula for the shores of the Black Sea.^[91] For the next couple hundred years, the restless Goths were a menace to the Roman Empire.^[92] Between the 2nd and 4th centuries the Goths slowly filtered deeper into the south and eastwards, making their way to what is now Kiev in Ukraine and pressuring Rome in the process.^[93] Around CE 238, the Goths make their first clear impact on Roman history, having moved from the Baltic sea to the area of the modern Ukraine.^{[citation needed]} Sometime in CE 250, the Gothic king Kniva employed the assistance of the Bastarnae, Carpi, various Goths, and the Taifali when he eventually laid siege to Philippopolis; he followed this victory up with another on the marshy terrain at Abrittus, a battle which cost the life of Roman emperor Decius and inaugurated a series of consecutive barbarian invasions of the northern Balkans and Asia Minor.^[94]

Close to the same time that the Goths were fighting the Romans in the Balkans, there is also the first mention of the Franks around CE 250.^[95] Perennial internal conflicts among several successive emperors of both the eastern and western Empire during the 4th century CE resulted in civil wars and damaged the overall quality of the Roman army; the fighting also depleted the elite from within their officer corps. To compensate for their losses the Romans recruited inferior untried Roman civilians and sought replacements from across the frontier region by militarily proficient barbarian troops, a development which further strengthened the position of the Germanic peoples.^[96]

Attempting to control the periphery of the Roman empire meant finding innovative ways of dealing with the Germanic people, so the Romans enlisted them as foederati (federates) and by the late fourth century, the majority of the Roman military was made up of Germanic warriors.^{[citation needed]} Federating whole tribes of Germanic people into the Empire marked a whole new phase of encroachment and facilitated the fragmentation of Rome from within its own borders.^[97]

In 260 AD, as the Crisis of the Third Century reached its climax, Postumus, a Germanic soldier in Roman service, established the Gallic Empire, which claimed suzerainty over Germania, Gaul, Hispania and Britannia. Postumus was eventually assassinated by his own followers, after which the Gallic Empire quickly disintegrated.^[98]

Among the Romans, the Germanic presence in the military was so extensive for example, that the word barbarus became a synonym for "soldier" and the imperial budget of the military was known as the ficus barbarus.^[o]^[p] Barbarians (Germanics) composed the mobile army of emperor Constantine with many of them, particularly the more organized ones like the Franks and Alamanni, reaching levels of high command. Constantine credited the military victories which enabled his rise to power to his Germanic troops, and is said to have recruited 40,000 Goths alone, who were tasked with guarding Constantinople. By this time, conventional Roman troops where rapidly losing military value.^[q] Despite Germanic peoples in many cases being enemies of the Romans, Germanic warriors in Roman service enabled the Roman Empire to survive longer than it would under other circumstances.^[r] Earlier accounts from Julius Caesar and Tacitus suggest ancient Germanic warriors considered themselves superior to the Romans.^{[citation needed]} Suebian king Ariovistus and the Frisian kings Malorix and Verritus are recorded by Roman historians boasting of supposed Germanic military superiority.^[s]^[t] An example of Germanic prominence in the Roman army shows in the fact that in CE 350 the Frankish general Claudius Silvanus was the high military commander of Gaul.^[103] Warriors and leaders among the Germanic peoples had an advantage over their Roman counterparts as they knew and could dexterously traverse both worlds, whereas the Romans despised barbarian culture and customs and were unable to secure trust amid the Germanic soldiers on their payrolls. In this way, the ethnic and regional ties within the evolving bureaucratic Roman-Germanic world began to favor the barbarians.^[104]

Roman Britannia was contemporaneously under constant threat during the 3rd and 4th centuries CE by northern Picts as well as the Germanic Saxons who sailed from north of Gaul to the eastern coast of the British Isles. Late in CE 367, the Roman garrisons in Britannia collapsed as the Germanic barbarians poured into the region from all directions.^[105] Attempting to permanently reestablish control on Britannia, the emperor Valentinian I sent an experienced Roman commander who was able to beat the invaders back after a year-long war and gain control of Londonium, but it was a Pyrrhic victory, for the Germanic invaders had burned down standing settlements, ravaged cities on the isles, interrupted trade and annihilated entire Roman garrisons.^[106] By the middle of the 5th century, the Picts, Scots and Anglo-Saxons began to dominate the once Roman Britannia.^[107]^[108]

During the fourth and fifth centuries CE Roman emperors did their best to stave off the advance of the Germanic tribes. While the rulers in the Eastern Empire were able to endure the frequent clashes without serious consequences to their territorial dominion, this was not the case in the Western Roman Empire.^{[citation needed]}

For upwards of two centuries, the Roman emperors fought and confined the Germanic tribes to Rhine-Danube frontier and in far-away Britain, but all that changed in CE 378 when the Visigoths destroyed as much as two-thirds of the Roman army of the East under emperor Valens at the Battle of Adrianople.^[109] Roman historian Ammianus Marcellinus referred to the damage inflicted by the Germanic tribes at Adrianople as an "irreparable disaster" and ended his account of Roman history with this battle.^{[citation needed]} Subsequent historians like Sir Edward Gibbon (among others) ascribe a similar significance to this event and call the Battle of Adrianople a watershed moment between the ancient world and the medieval one that followed; for not only did this battle reveal Rome's weakness to the Germanic tribes and inspire them accordingly, never again were they to leave Roman soil.^[110] Evidence of the trauma suffered at the hands of the ransacking Visigoths shows up in the writings of the former bishop of Milan, Ambrose, who wrote about melting down golden church plates early in his episcopate so as to help the victims of the calamity at Adrianople.^[111]

Migration Period

The Germans, our ferocious and implacable foe^[112]

— Ammianus Marcellinus

The arrival of the nomadic Huns along the Black Sea corridor in CE 375 further caused a Germanic exodus across the Roman border.^[113] Germanic people from the northern coasts of Europe had been making their way into Britain for several centuries before the larger-scale incursions took place.^[114] Some Germanic tribes, in particular the Gepids and the Ostrogoths, joined the Huns, and played a prominent role in the Hunnic Empire, where Gothic became the lingua franca.^[u] These Germanic tribes fought with Attila against the Western Roman Empire and other Germanic tribes at the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains, in which Attila was defeated. After the death of Attila soon afterwards, a coalition of Germanic tribes led by the Gepid king Ardaric broke loose from Hunnic control at the Battle of Nedao.^{[citation needed]}

Faced with the Hunnic onslaught, several Germanic tribes migrated westwards, taking them to Great Britain and far south through present day Continental Europe to the Mediterranean and northern Africa.^{[citation needed]} Over time, this wandering meant intrusions into other tribal territories, and the ensuing wars for land escalated with the dwindling amount of unoccupied territory. Roaming tribes of Germanic people then began staking out permanent homes as a means of protection. Much of this resulted in fixed settlements from which many, under a powerful leader, expanded outwards.^[116] Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Lombards made their way into Italy; Vandals, Burgundians, Franks, and Visigoths conquered much of Gaul; Vandals and Visigoths also pushed into Spain; Vandals additionally made it into North Africa; the Alamanni established a strong presence in the middle Rhine and Alps.^[117] In Denmark the Jutes merged with the Danes, in Sweden the Geats and Gutes merged with the Swedes. In England, the Angles merged with the Saxons and other groups (notably the Jutes), as well as absorbing some natives, to form the Anglo-Saxons (later known as the English).^[118] Essentially Roman civilization was overrun by these variants of Germanic peoples during the 5th century.^[119]

A direct result of the Roman retreat was the disappearance of imported products like ceramics and coins, and a return to virtually unchanged local Iron Age production methods.^{[citation needed]} According to recent views this has caused confusion for decades, and theories assuming the total abandonment of the coastal regions to account for an archaeological time gap that never existed have been renounced.^{[citation needed]} Instead, it has been confirmed that the Frisian graves had been used without interruption between the 4th and 9th centuries and that inhabited areas show continuity with the Roman period in revealing coins, jewellery and ceramics of the 5th century. Also, people continued to live in the same three-aisled farmhouse, while to the east completely new types of buildings arose. More to the south in Belgium, archaeological evidence from this period indicates immigration from the north.^[120]

Fall of the Western Roman Empire

Some of the Germanic tribes are frequently credited in popular depictions of the decline of the Roman Empire in the 5th century. Many historians and archaeologists have since the 1950s shifted their interpretations in such a way that the Germanic peoples are no longer seen as invading a decaying empire but as being co-opted into helping defend territory the central government could no longer adequately administer.^[v]

When the Roman Empire refused to allow the Visigoths to settle in Noricum for instance, they responded by sacking Rome in CE 410 under the leadership of Alaric I.^[122] Oddly enough, Alaric I did not see his imposition in Rome as an attack against the Roman Empire per se but as an attempt to gain a favorable position within its borders, particularly since the Visigoths held the Empire in high regard.^[123] Alaric certainly had no intentions to destroy the great city which was symbolic of Roman power, but he needed to pay his army and the spoils of the city not only afforded the ability to do that, its wealth made him "the richest general in the empire."^[124] For the next year, Alaric extracted vast sums from the city; this included 5,000 pounds of gold, 30,000 pounds of silver, 5,000 pounds of oriental pepper, gilded statues from the Forum, and even the one-ton solid silver dome which Constantine once placed over the baptismal basin next to the Lateran basilica.^[125] Not only was Alaric able to bleed Rome, he also established a Gothic confederation consisting of Theruingian and Greuthungic peoples, and he played the eastern and western Roman Empires off against one another for his benefit.^[126]

While Germanic tribes overran the once western Roman provinces, they also continued to strive for regional ascendancy closer to Rome's center; meanwhile the threat along the periphery from the Huns created additional difficulties for the Empire.^[127] Sometime during the 4th or 5th century CE, the Bastarnae were defeated by the Huns, ending their regional domination.^[128]^[56]

Individuals and small groups from Germanic tribes had long been recruited from the territories beyond the limes (i.e., the regions just outside the Roman Empire), and some of them had risen high in the command structure of the army.^{[citation needed]} The Rhine and Danube provided the bulk of geographic separation for the Roman limes. On one side of the limes stood 'Latin' Europe, law, Roman order, prosperous trading markets, towns and everything that constituted modern civilization for that era; while on the other side stood barbarism, technical backwardness, illiteracy and a tribal society of fierce warriors.^[129] Then the Empire recruited entire tribal groups under their native leaders as military officers. Historian Evangelos Chrysos argues the implications concerning the recruitment of the barbarians into the Roman army during the migration period were enormous and relates that:

it offered them experience of how the imperial army was organized, how the government arranged the military and functional logistics of their involvement as soldiers or officers and how it administered their practical life, how the professional expertise and the social values of the individual soldier were cultivated in the camp and on the battlefield, how the ideas about the state and its objectives were to be implemented by men in uniform, how the Empire was composed and how it functioned at an administrative level. This knowledge of and experience with the Romans opened to individual members of the gentes a path which, once taken, would lead them to more or less substantial affiliation or even solidarity with the Roman world. To take an example from the economic sphere: The service in the Roman army introduced the individual or corporate members into the monetary system of the Empire since quite a substantial part of their salary was paid to them in cash. With money in their hands the "guests" were by necessity exposed to the possibility of taking part in the economic system, of becoming accustomed to the rules of the wide market, of absorbing the messages of or reacting to the imperial propaganda passed to the citizens through the legends on the coins. In addition the goods offered in the markets influenced and transformed the newcomers' food and aesthetic tastes and their cultural horizon. Furthermore Roman civilitas was an attractive goal for every individual wishing to succeed in his social advancement.^[130]

Assisting with defense eventually shifted into administration and then outright rule, as Roman government passed into the hands of Germanic leaders. Odoacer (who commanded the German mercenaries in Italy)^[131] deposed Romulus Augustulus, the last emperor of the West in CE 476.^[132] Odoacer ruled from Rome and Ravenna, restored the Colosseum and assigned seats to senatorial dignitaries as part of the process of consolidating his rule.^[133]

The presence of successor states controlled by a nobility from one of the Germanic tribes is evident in the 6th century – even in Italy, the former heart of the Empire, where Odoacer was followed by Theodoric the Great, king of the Ostrogoths, who was regarded by Roman citizens and Gothic settlers alike as legitimate successor to the rule of Rome and Italy.^[134] Theodoric ruled from CE 493–526, twice as long as his predecessor, and his rule is evidenced by an abundance of documents.^[135] Under the Ostrogoths a considerable degree of Roman and Germanic cultural and political fusion was achieved.^[136] Germanic kings worked in-tandem with Roman administrators to the extent possible to help ensure a smooth transition and to facilitate the profitable administration of once Roman lands.^[137] Slowly but surely, the distinction between Germanic rulers and Roman subjects faded, followed by varying degrees of "cultural assimilation" which included the adoption of the Gothic language by some of the indigenous people of the former Roman Empire but this was certainly not ubiquitous as Gothic identity still remained distinctive.^[138] Theodoric may have tried too hard to accommodate the various people under his dominion; indulging "Romans and Goths, Catholics and Arians, Latin and barbarian culture" resulted in the eventual failure of the Ostrogothic reign and the subsequent "end of Italy as the heartland of late antiquity."^[139]

According to noted historian Herwig Wolfram, the Germanic peoples did not and could not "conquer the more advanced Roman world" nor were they able to "restore it as a political and economic entity"; instead, he asserts that the empire's "universalism" was replaced by "tribal particularism" which gave way to "regional patriotism".^[140]

The Germanic peoples who overran the Western Roman Empire probably numbered less than 100,000 people per tribe, including approximately 15,000-20,000 warriors. They constituted a tiny minority of the population in the lands over which they seized control.^[w]^[x]^[y] Among these tribes, the Ostrogoths in Italy and the Visigoths in Spain are recorded to have enacted laws against intermarriage in order to preserve their identity.^[z]^[aa]

The entry of the Germanic tribes deep into the heart of Europe and the subsequent collapse of the western Roman Empire resulted in a "massive disruption" to long established communication networks, a system that had in many ways "bound much of the continent together for centuries."^[144] Trade networks and routes shifted accordingly, Germanic kingdoms and peoples established boundaries and it was not until the appearance of the Arabs in Iberia and into Anatolia that Europeans began reestablishing their networks to deal with a new threat.^[145]

Early Middle Ages

The transition of the Migration period to the Middle Ages proper took place over the course of the second half of the 1st millennium. It was marked by the Christianization of the Germanic peoples and the formation of stable kingdoms replacing the mostly tribal structures of the Migration period. Some of this stability is discernible in the fact that the Pope recognized Theodoric's reign when the Germanic conqueror entered Rome in CE 500, despite that Theodoric was a known practitioner of Arianism, a faith which the First Council of Nicaea condemned in CE 325.^[146] Theodoric's Germanic subjects and administrators from the Roman Catholic Church cooperated in serving him, helping establish a codified system of laws and ordinances which facilitated the integration of the Gothic peoples into a burgeoning empire, solidifying their place as they appropriated a Roman identity of sorts.^[147] The foundations laid by the Empire enabled the successor Germanic kingdoms to maintain a familiar structure and their success can be seen as part of the lasting triumph of Rome.^[148]

In continental Europe, this Germanic evolution saw the rise of Francia in the Merovingian period under the rule of Clovis I who had deposed the last emperor of Gaul, eclipsing lesser kingdoms such as Alemannia.^[149] The Merovingians controlled most of Gaul under Clovis, who, through conversion to Christianity, allied himself with the Gallo-Romans. While the Merovingians were checked by the armies of the Ostrogoth Theodoric, they remained the most powerful kingdom in Western Europe and the intermixing of their people with the Romans through marriage rendered the Frankish people less a Germanic tribe and more a "European people" in a manner of speaking.^[150] Most of Gaul was under Merovingian control as was part of Italy and their overlordship extended into Germany where they reigned over the Thuringians, Alamans, and Bavarians.^[151] Evidence also exists that they may have even had suzerainty over south-east England.^[152] Frankish historian Gregory of Tours relates that Clovis converted to Christianity partly as a result of his wife's urging and even more so due to having won a desperate battle after calling out to Christ. According to Gregory, this conversion was sincere but it also proved politically expedient as Clovis used his new faith as a means to consolidate his political power by Christianizing his army.^[153]^[ab] Against Germanic tradition, each of the four sons of Clovis attempted to secure power in different cities but their inability to prove themselves on the battlefield and intrigue against one another led the Visigoths back to electing their leadership.^[154]

When Merovingian rule eventually weakened, they were supplanted by another powerful Frankish family, the Carolingians, a dynastic order which produced Charles Martel, and Charlemagne.^[155] The coronation of Charlemagne as emperor by Pope Leo III in Rome on Christmas Day, CE 800 represented a shift in the power structure from the south to the north. Frankish power ultimately laid the foundations for the modern nations of Germany and France.^[156] For historians, Charlemagne's appearance in the historical chronicle of Europe also marks a transition where the voice of the north appears in its own vernacular thanks to the spread of Christianity, after which the northerners began writing in Latin, Germanic, and Celtic; whereas before, the Germanic people were only known through Roman or Greek sources.^[157]

In England, the Germanic Anglo-Saxon tribes reigned over the south of Great Britain from approximately 519 to the tenth century until the Wessex hegemony became the nucleus for the unification of England.^[158]^[159]

Scandinavia was in the Vendel period and eventually entered the Viking Age, with expansion to Britain, Ireland and Iceland in the west and as far as Russia and Greece in the east.^[160]^[161]^[162] Swedish Vikings, known locally as the Rus', had ventured deep into Russia, where they founded the state of Kievan Rus'. In cooperation with Crimean Goths, the Rus' destroyed the Khazar Khaganate and became the dominant power in Eastern Europe. They were eventually assimilated by the local East Slavic population.^[163] By CE 900 the Vikings secured for themselves a foothold on Frankish soil along the Lower Seine River valley in what is now France that became known as Normandy. Hence they became the Normans. They established the Duchy of Normandy, a territorial acquisition which provided them the opportunity to expand beyond Normandy into Anglo-Saxon England.^[164] The subsequent Norman Conquest which followed in CE 1066 wrought immense changes to life in England as their new Scandinavian masters altered their government, lordship, public holdings, culture and DNA pool permanently.^[165]

The various Germanic tribal cultures began their transformation into the larger nations of later history, English, Norse and German, and in the case of Burgundy, Lombardy and Normandy blending into a Romano-Germanic culture. Many of these later nation states started originally as "client buffer states" for the Roman Empire so as to protect it from its enemies further away.^[166] Eventually they carved out their own unique historical paths.

Post-migration ethnogeneses

The interactions of the migrating Germanic peoples and the deteriorating Roman empire formed the basis of the history and society of most of Western Europe from the Early Middle Ages and up to the present day.^[167]

The Goths and Vandals were linguistically assimilated to their Latin (Romance) substrate populations. Evidence exists that for 2nd- and 3rd-century Goths as well as for 4th- and 5th-century Lombards that significant population displacement throughout Roman-occupied Europe occurred.^{[citation needed]} This quite likely contributed to their linguistic assimilation.^[168] An exception to this pattern was the Crimean Goths, who preserved their dialect into the 18th century). Burgundians and Lombards were assimilated into both Latin (French and Italian) and Germanic (German-speaking Swiss) populations.^{[citation needed]}

Early Medieval Germanic peoples were often assimilated into the walha substrate cultures of their subject populations. Thus, the Burgundians of Burgundy, the Vandals of Northern Africa, and the Visigoths of France and Iberia, lost some Germanic identity and became part of Romano-Germanic Europe.^{[citation needed]} For the Germanic Visigoths in particular, they had intimate contact with Rome for two centuries before their domination of the Iberian Peninsula and were accordingly permeated by Roman culture.^[169] Likewise, the Franks of Western Francia form part of the ancestry of the French people.^{[citation needed]}

The Viking Age Norse people split into an Old East Norse and an Old West Norse group, which further separated into Icelanders, Faroese and Norwegians on one hand and Swedes and Danes on the other. In Scandinavia, there is a long history of assimilation of and by the Sami people and Finnic peoples, namely Finns and Karelians. In today's usage, the term "Nordic peoples" refers to the ethnic groups in all of the Nordic countries.^{[citation needed]}

In Great Britain, Germanic people coalesced into the Anglo-Saxon (or English) people between the 8th and 10th centuries.^{[citation needed]}

The Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain resulted in Anglo-Saxon (or English) displacement and cultural assimilation of the indigenous culture, the Brythonic-speaking British culture, causing the foundation of a new kingdom, England.^{[citation needed]} As in what became England, indigenous Brythonic Celtic culture in some of the south-eastern parts of what became Scotland (approximately the Lothian and Borders region) and areas of what became the Northwest of England (the kingdoms of Rheged, Elmet, etc.) succumbed to Germanic influence c.600—800, due to the extension of overlordship and settlement from the Anglo-Saxon areas to the south.^{[citation needed]} Cultural and linguistic assimilation occurred less frequently between the Germanic Anglo-Saxons and the indigenous people who resided in the Roman dominated areas of England, particularly in the regions that remained previously unconquered. Anglo-Saxons occupied Somerset, the Severn valley, and Lancaster by c. 700 where they remained dominant. Over time, the Anglo-Saxons, with their distinct culture and language, displaced much of the extant Roman influence of old.^[170]

On the European continent, East Francia developed into the Kingdom of Germany, which became the most important part of the Holy Roman Empire proclaimed by Otto I in 962 AD.^[171]

Demographics

Philologist Francis Owen estimates that there were around 4,000,000 Germanic people at the dawn of the Migration Period.^[172]

Physical appearance

Tacitus writes in Germania that the early Germanic peoples looked universally the same, having "fierce blue eyes, red hair and large frames." He repeats this description in the Agricola, stating that the inhabitants of Caledonia were big and red haired, suggesting a Germanic origin. On account of this, Tacitus suggested that the Germanic peoples were an "indigenous people, very little affected by admixture with other races through immigration or intercourse". Philologist Francis Owen notes that when Tacitus refers to the Germanic peoples having "red hair", this also includes blond hair.^[173]

The remergence of inhumation during the Migration period has enabled researchers to examine the physical type of the Germanic peoples at this time time. Archaeological research has lent support to the observations of Tacitus with regards to the physical appearance of early Germanic peoples. The observations of Tacitus are substantiated by other Roman writers and by depictions of Germanic warriors on Roman columns.^[173]

There is little evidence of any large-scale migration into Scandinavia since the arrival of the Corded Ware culture, and the physical type of the Germanic people since then has therefore remained largely the same.^[173]

Culture

Early Germanic culture is though to represent a fusion of Indo-European and indigenous Northern European elements. This fusion appears to have been facilitated by the expansion of the Corded Ware culture into Northern Europe during the 3rd millennium BC, and to have been completed by the emergence of the Nordic Bronze Age in the 2nd millennium BC. It is from the Nordic Bronze Age from which early Germanic culture largely derived.^[174]

Germanic peoples are primarily characterized as speakers of Germanic languages. Their historical literature revolved around the lives of their gods and ancestors, and was historically transmitted orally by professional poets. Some of this literature was written down in the Middle Ages.^[175] In the early centuries AD, Germanic peoples devised a Runic script, which was eventually replaced with the Latin alphabet.^[176]

Early Germanic peoples practiced Germanic paganism, a polytheistic ethnic religion primarily derived from Proto-Indo-European religion. Odin eventually emerged as the leading deity of the Germanic pantheon. By the end of the Middle Ages, the Germanic peoples had all been converted to Christianity, although elements of Germanic paganism has survived in Germanic folklore.^[174]

Early Germanic culture was characterized by a rigorous code of ethics which emphasised independence, individuality, honesty and loyalty.^[177]^[ac] Society was hierarchical, being divided into warriors, independent farmers and slaves respectively, with warriors being in the position of power. Society was organized along tribal lines, and the membership of the individual in an extended family, the Sippe, played a major role in determining the position of the individual in society. Germanic peoples had various forms of kingship, although the power of the king could be curtailed by the freemen in the tribal assembly, known as the thing. In Germanic law, guilt was often determined through a trial by ordeal or trial by combat, and capital punishment was meted out for certain crimes against the community.^[179]

Archaeological research has revealed that the early Germanic peoples were primarily agricultural, although husbandry and fishing were important sources of livelihood depending on the nature of the environment.^[180] They carried out extensive trade with their neighbours, notably exporting amber, slaves, mercenaries and animal hides, and importing weapons, metals, glassware and coins in return.^[181] They eventually came to excel at craftsmanship, particularly metalworking.^[182] In many cases in fact, ancient Germanic smiths and other craftsmen produced products of higher quality than the Romans.^[ad]^[ae]

Germanic villages were typically small and often composed of individual households. An important centre in the village was the mead hall, in which the chieftain arranged lavish feasts for his followers. During times of trouble certain Germanic tribes would embark on mass-migrations and temporarily embrace a semi-nomadic way of life.^[185]

Early Germanic peoples had a diverse diet composed of cereal products, cheese, milk and meat. They consumed a number of fermented drinks, such as ale, mead, beer and wine, which played an important role in Germanic social life. Certain warlike Germanic tribes are recorded as being teetotalers.^[180] ^[186]

Early Germanic society was patriarchal, although women played a more significant role in their community than in other contemporary societies. The early Germanic peoples were mostly monogamous, and married relatively late. Wives handled the daily management of the household, which was composed of the immediate family and slaves.^[187]^[188] Slaves in early Germanic culture were treated much more humanely than in other contemporary societies.^[189]

Although their societies appear to have been remarkably peaceful in the Bronze Age, the introduction of iron radically changed Germanic society, which thereafter became heavily characterized by war. Germanic warfare initially emphazised offensive infantry warfare, although they would eventually also excel at horse-powered-warfare and naval warfare as well. In a series of Germanic Wars, Germanic peoples would eventually overwhelm the Western Roman Empire and establish themselves as a dominant minority in its place.^[190]

With the Christianization of the Germanic peoples in the Middle Ages and the submergence of the various tribes into centralized states, Germanic culture lost most of its unique character. Germanic languages continues to be spoken however, and traces of Germanic culture can still be found in Germanic folklore.^[191]^[192]

Genetics

File:Percentage of major Y-DNA haplogroups in Europe.png

Percentage of major Y-DNA haplogroups in Europe; Haplogroup I1 represented by light blue

It is suggested by geneticists that the movements of Germanic peoples has had a strong influence upon the modern distribution of the male lineage represented by the Y-DNA haplogroup I1, which is believed to have originated with one man, who lived approximately 4,000 to 6,000 years ago somewhere in Northern Europe, possibly modern Denmark (see Most Recent Common Ancestor for more information). There is evidence of this man's descendants settling in all of the areas that Germanic tribes are recorded as having subsequently invaded or migrated to.^[af]

Haplogroup I1 is older than Germanic languages, but may have been present among early Germanic speakers. Other male lines likely to have been present during the development and dispersal of Germanic language populations include R1a1a, R1b-P312 and R1b-U106, a genetic combination of the haplogroups found to be strongly-represented among current Germanic speaking peoples.^[193] Peaking in northern Europe, the R1b-U106 marker seems particular interesting in distribution and provides some helpful genetic clues regarding the historical trek made by the Germanic people.^[194]

Haplogroup I1 accounts for approximately 40% of Icelandic males, 40%–50% of Swedish males, 40% of Norwegian males, and 40% of Danish Human Y-chromosome DNA haplogroups. Haplogroup I1 peaks in certain areas of Northern Germany and Eastern England at more than 30%.^[195]

Later Germanic studies and their influence

The Renaissance revived interest in pre-Christian Classical Antiquity and only in a second phase in pre-Christian Northern Europe.^[196] The Germanic peoples of the Roman era are often lumped with the other agents of the barbarian invasions, the Alans and the Huns, as opposed to the civilized "Roman" identity of the Holy Roman Empire.^[197]

Early modern publications dealing with Old Norse culture appeared in the 16th century, e.g. Historia de gentibus septentrionalibus (Olaus Magnus, 1555) and the first edition of the 13th century Gesta Danorum (Saxo Grammaticus), in 1514.^[198] Authors of the German Renaissance such as Johannes Aventinus discovered the Germanii of Tacitus as the "Old Germans", whose virtue and unspoiled manhood, as it appears in the Roman accounts of noble savagery, they contrast with the decadence of their own day.^[199]

The pace of publication increased during the 17th century with Latin translations of the Edda (notably Peder Resen's Edda Islandorum of 1665). The Viking revival of 18th century Romanticism created a fascination with anything "Nordic" in disposition.^[200] The beginning of Germanic philology proper begins in the early 19th century, with Rasmus Rask's Icelandic Lexicon of 1814, and was in full bloom by the 1830s, with Jacob Grimm's Deutsche Mythologie giving an extensive account of reconstructed Germanic mythology and composing a German dictionary (Deutsches Wörterbuch) of Germanic etymology.^[201] Jacob Grimm also coauthored with his brother Wilhelm, the famous Grimm's Fairy Tales. Apart from linguistic studies, the subject of what became of the Roman era Germanic tribes, and how they influenced the Middle Ages and the development of modern Western culture was a subject discussed during the Enlightenment by such as writers as Montesquieu and Giambattista Vico.^[202]

Later still, the development of Germanic studies as an academic discipline in the 19th century ran parallel to the rise of nationalism in Europe and the search for national histories for the nascent nation states developing after the end of the Napoleonic Wars.^[203] A "Germanic" national ethnicity offered itself for the unification of Germany, contrasting the emerging German Empire with its neighboring rivals of differing ancestry.^[204] The nascent belief in a German ethnicity was subsequently founded upon national myths of Germanic antiquity.^[205] These tendencies culminated in a later Pan-Germanism, Alldeutsche Bewegung which had as its aim, the political unity of all of German-speaking Europe (all Volksdeutsche) into a Teutonic nation state.^[206]^[207]

Contemporary Romantic nationalism in Scandinavia placed more weight on the Viking Age, resulting in the movement known as Scandinavism.^[208] The theories of race developed in the same period, which used Darwinian evolutionary ideals and pseudo-scientific methods in the identification of Germanic peoples (members of a Nordic race), as being superior to other ethnicities.^[209] Scientific racism flourished in the late 19th century and into the mid-20th century, where it became the basis for specious racial comparisons and justification for eugenic efforts; it also contributed to compulsory sterilization, anti-miscegenation laws, and was used to sanction immigration restrictions in both Europe and the United States.^[ag] Following World War II, as a response to political influences of the past, government support for the study of ancient Germanic history and culture was significantly reduced both in Germany and Scandinavia.^[ah]

Historical Germanic paganism, the indigenous religion of the Germanic peoples, ended with Christianization in the 11th century.^[178] Elements of Germanic paganism survived into post-Christianization folklore, and today new religious movements exist which see themselves as modern revivals of Germanic Heathenry.

Notes

^ The Latin term is sometimes translated as Germans.
^ "Mommsen referred to the Battle of the Teutoburg forest as a turning-point in world history."^[4]
^ In these early records of apparent Germanic tribes, tribal leader names of the Cimbri and Sigambri, and tribal names such as Tencteri and Usipetes, are also apparently Gaulish, even coming from the east of the Rhine.
^ See: L. Rübekeil, Suebica. Völkernamen und Ethnos, Innsbruck 1992, 187–214.
^ The Cherusci people are the progenitors of Arminius, who once a Roman general, betrayed his erstwhile Roman legions by attacking them using the combined forces of Germanic tribes in 9 CE at Teutoburg Forest, a move which ended the Roman Empire's efforts to expand east of the Rhine.^[31]
^ See: Pomponius Mela, Description of the World, trans. F.E. Romer (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1998), 109–110, 3.31–3.32
^ See: The New Encyclopædia Britannica, 15th edition, 22: pp. 641–642.
^ Ancient authors we know by name who saw Pytheas' text were Dicaearchus, Timaeus, Eratosthenes, Crates of Mallus, Hipparchus, Polybius, Artemidorus and Posidonius, as Lionel Pearson remarked in reviewing Hans Joachim Mette, Pytheas von Massalia (Berlin: Gruyter) 1952, in Classical Philology 49.3 (July 1954), pp. 212–214.
^ A preserved report from the Governor of Moesia indicates that Nero released a notable number of Bastarnae captives in recompense for their tribal King's willingness to submit before the Roman standards.^[60]
^ Plutarch writes of these Cimbrian warriors with "sky blue" colored eyes, see: Truces et cærulei oculi. -- Germ. IX. Plutarch (in Marius, XI). Cited from Francis B. Gummere, Germanic Origins: A Study in Primitive Culture (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1892), 58 fn.
^ "Proximity to our provinces and familiarity with seaborne imports bring the Gauls many things to use and keep, so they gradually grew accustomed to defeat, losing many battles and not even claiming to be the Germans' equals in courage now."^[66]
^ "[O]ur men inquired and heard Gauls and merchants describing the Germans' huge bodies, their incredible strength, and their experience in arms. They had often encountered them and could not stand the sight of them or endure their gaze. Great fear suddenly seized our whole army..."^[67]
^ The tribal Helvetii lend their namesake to the formal epithet for the nation of Switzerland – the Helvetic Confederacy (or Helvetia). See: The Encyclopædia Britannica (2015), "Helvetii". Stable URL: http://www.britannica.com/topic/Helvetii
^ The texts of the chronicler Marcellinus demonstrate that, at the very least, military cooperation between the Germanic tribes and the Romans took place at times since he makes reference to a "pactum vicissitudinus reddendae".^[87]
^ "By the late fourth century Germanics constituted most of the Roman military."^[99]
^ "In basic organization, values, tactics, and weaponry, the “Roman” army had become largely Germanic."^[100]
^ "Constantine credited his victories against Maxentius in 311–312 principally to his barbarian troops, who were honoured on the triumphal Arch of Constantine in Rome. In opposition to him, Licinius mustered drafts of Goths to strengthen his army. Goths were also brought in by Constantine, to the number of 40,000, it is said, to help defend Constantinople in the latter part of his reign, and the palace guard was thenceforward composed mostly of Germans, from among whom a great many high army commands were filled. Dependence on immigrants or first-generation barbarians in war was to increase steadily, at a time when conventional Roman troops were losing military value."^[7]
^ "Germanic peoples were the scourge of the Western Empire. Nevertheless, it was only with German help that the empire was able to survive as long as it did. The Roman army received an ever-growing number of recruits from the German tribes..."^[34]
^ "If caesar wished, let him join battle, but he should know what strength unbeaten Germans possessed, a people tested in arms, now living in the open fourteen years."^[101]
^ "In point of valour and integrity, the Germans, they said, were second to no people on earth."^[102]
^ "In the polylingual camp of Attila, Gothic had the rank of a lingua franca...."^[115]
^ Recent academic work from the likes of Peter Heather supports this argument. See: Heather, Peter. (2012) Empires and Barbarians: The Fall of Rome and the Birth of Europe. Conversely, historian Bryan Ward-Perkins paints a different picture altogether. Ward-Perkins states that, "The invaders were not guilty of murder, but they had committed manslaughter."^[121] The two titles alone speak to their divergent positions.
^ "So much for the conventional notions. In real life, these tribes were surprisingly small: fifteen to twenty thousand warriors—which means a total of about one hundred thousand people in a tribe—was the maximum number a large people could raise. In defiance of the facts, we hear to this day of barbarian hordes. These people are likewise presented as conquerors of the Roman Empire, even though they constituted a vanishing minority within it."^[141]
^ "The barbarians were everywhere a small minority. They established themselves on the great estates and divided the land to the benefit of the federates without doing much harm to the lower classes or disturbing the economy."^[7]
^ "Despite the collapse of imperial rule in Spain, Roman influence remained strong. The majority of the population, probably about six million, were Hispano-Romans, as compared with 200,000 barbarians."^[142]
^ "[H]is people could not legally intermarry with Romans."^[143]
^ "The Visigothic king was theoretically ruler of only his own people, whereas the Hispano-Romans continued to profess allegiance to a rapidly vanishing imperial authority. A Roman law that prohibited intermarriage between the two peoples was, however, abolished in the late 6th century."^[142]
^ For a period of upwards of 1,300 years since the Frankish king Clovis was converted to Christianity (he ruled Gaul in what eventually became modern France), eighteen monarchs of France have been Christened with a French derivation of his Latin name Ludovicus or "Louis" in modern French. See: Diarmaid MacCulloch, Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years (New York: Penguin, 2011), p. 324.
^ "The rigorous ethics of early Germanic society, based on trust, loyalty, and courage, and the perhaps somewhat idealized picture of the moral code given by Tacitus, had a divine sanction..."^[178]
^ "Some smiths were able to rework iron into high-quality steel and make sword blades with a core of softer steel for flexibility and harder steel on the exterior to keep a sharp edge, far finer weapons than those used in the Roman army at the time."^[183]
^ "Furthermore, the skills of Germanic smiths and other craftsmen were as good as, or better than those found inside the Roman empire."^[184]
^ New Phylthatetic Relationships for Y-chromosome Haplogroup I: Reappraising its Phylogeography and Prehistory," Rethinking the Human Evolution, Mellars P, Boyle K, Bar-Yosef O, Stringer C, Eds. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, UK, 2007, pp. 33–42 by Underhill PA, Myres NM, Rootsi S, Chow CT, Lin AA, Otillar RP, King R, Zhivotovsky LA, Balanovsky O, Pshenichnov A, Ritchie KH, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Kivisild T, Villems R, Woodward SR.
^ For more on the historical trek of European anti-Semitism and how scientific racism contributed to the Holocaust, see: Mosse, George L. Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism. New York: Harper & Row, 1980.
^ "In Germany...the first need was to detach prehistoric studies from the political influences of the pre-war period. German archaeologists, like their Scandinavian colleagues though sometimes for different reasons, have had to make do with very slender financial resources."^[210]

References

^ ^a ^b Liebeschuetz 2015, pp. 85–100.
^ ^a ^b ^c Germanic peoples, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ ^a ^b Wolfram 1997, p. 12.
^ Wells 2003, p. 35.
^ Beckwith 2009, pp. 82–83.
^ Wolfram 1988, pp. 86–89.
^ ^a ^b ^c Ancient Rome: The Barbarian Invasions, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Wolfram 1997, p. 4.
^ Schulze 2001, p. 4.
^ Hoad & 1997 192.
^ Partridge 1966, p. 1265.
^ Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 245.
^ Stümpel 1932, p. 60.
^ Heather 2012, pp. 5–8.
^ Caesar 2019, p. 45, 2.4.
^ ^a ^b Tacitus 2009, p. 38 [Ch. 2].
^ Manco 2013, p. 207.
^ Caesar 2019, pp. 45–46, 2.4.
^ Lamarcq & Rogge 1996, p. 44.
^ Lamarcq & Rogge 1996, p. 47.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g The Imperial Teutonic Order.
^ Burns 2003, pp. 15–16.
^ Burns 2003, pp. 232–233.
^ Burns 2003, p. 19.
^ Dalby 1999, p. 224.
^ Detwiler 1999, p. 3.
^ Burns 2003, pp. 66–67.
^ Tacitus 2009, p. 39 [Ch. 4].
^ Tacitus 2009, p. 57 [Ch. 39].
^ Tacitus 2009, p. 58 [Ch. 40].
^ Ozment 2005, pp. 20–21.
^ See: [http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:latinLit:phi0978.phi001.perseus-eng1:4.2 Plin. Nat. 4.28].
^ Geography [http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0099.tlg001.perseus-eng2:7.1 7.1].
^ ^a ^b History of Europe: The Germans and Huns, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 296–297.
^ Kinder & Hilgemann 2004, p. 109.
^ Bury 2000, p. 5.
^ Cunliffe 2011, p. 309–316.
^ Germanic languages: The Emergence of Germanic Languages, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Verhart 2006, pp. 81–82.
^ Verhart 2006, p. 67.
^ Well 1996, pp. 603–611.
^ Bogucki & Crabtree 2003, p. 152.
^ Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 222.
^ Hachmann, Kossack & Kuhn 1962, pp. 183–212.
^ Verhart 2006, pp. 175–176.
^ Bury 2000, p. 6.
^ Bury 2000, pp. 6–7.
^ Germany: Ancient History, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Bury 2000, pp. 7–9.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 301.
^ Osborne 2008, p. 38.
^ Cunliffe 2011, pp. 6–8.
^ Burns 2003, pp. 51–52.
^ Denniston 1962, p. 369.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 61.
^ Todd 2004, p. 23.
^ ^a ^b Burns 1994, p. 103.
^ Heather 2005, p. 49.
^ ^a ^b Mommsen 1968, p. 229.
^ Williams 1998, p. 184.
^ Bury 2000, p. 15.
^ Ozment 2005, p. 58fn.
^ Woolf 2012, pp. 105–107.
^ Cunliffe 2011, pp. 369–371.
^ Caesar 2019, pp. 156, 6.24.
^ Caesar 2019, pp. 29, 1.39.
^ Caesar 2019, pp. 153–154, 6.20–6.21.
^ Pagden 2001, p. 22.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 302.
^ Todd 2004, p. 22.
^ Todd 2004, pp. 22–23.
^ Wolfram 1997, pp. 36–37.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 301–302.
^ Ozment 2005, p. 19.
^ Pohl 2002, p. 16.
^ Cunliffe 2011, p. 384.
^ Todd 1999, pp. 32–33.
^ Goldsworthy 2016, pp. 201, 210, 212.
^ Goldsworthy 2016, p. 210.
^ Tacitus 1873, p. 150 [Book 4, Ch. 17].
^ Boatwright, Gargola & Talbert 2004, p. 360.
^ Tacitus 2009, p. 37 [Ch. 56].
^ Burns 2003, p. 183.
^ Seneca 1776, p. 218.
^ Heather 2012, p. 594.
^ Bury 2000, p. 10.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 304.
^ Geary 1999, p. 109.
^ Collins 1999, pp. 2–3.
^ Bury 2000, p. 16.
^ Bury 2000, pp. 16–33.
^ Kishlansky, Geary & O'Brien 2008, p. 166.
^ Todd 2004, p. 140.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 304–305.
^ Collins 1999, p. 46.
^ Bury 2000, p. 61.
^ Wolfram 1997, pp. 46–49.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 305–306.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 321–322.
^ Caesar 2019, p. 28.
^ Tacitus 1832, p. 48.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 306.
^ Pohl 1997, pp. 34–35.
^ Bauer 2010, p. 45.
^ Bauer 2010, pp. 45–46.
^ Bury 2000, pp. 129–130.
^ Davies 1998, pp. 231–232.
^ Katz 1955, p. 88.
^ Katz 1955, pp. 88–89.
^ Brown 2012, p. 128.
^ Williams 1998.
^ Manco 2013, p. 204.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 26.
^ Wolfram 1997, p. 142.
^ James 1995, pp. 60–67.
^ Drinkwater 2007, p. 81.
^ Kendrick 2013, pp. 60–63.
^ Pagden 2001, p. 37.
^ Bloemers & van Dorp 1991, pp. 329–338.
^ Ward-Perkins 2005, p. 134.
^ Davies 1998, p. 229.
^ Bury 2000, pp. 65–66.
^ Brown 2012, p. 294.
^ Brown 2012, pp. 294–295.
^ Collins 1999, pp. 53–54.
^ Davies 1998, p. 232.
^ Heather 2005, p. 154.
^ Roberts 1997, pp. 146–147.
^ Chrysos 2003, pp. 13–14.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 307.
^ Ward-Perkins 2005, p. 64.
^ O'Donnell 2008, p. 105.
^ Santosuo 2004, pp. 13–15.
^ O'Donnell 2008, pp. 105–107.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 308.
^ Ward-Perkins 2005, pp. 69–70.
^ Ward-Perkins 2005, p. 72.
^ Wolfram 1988, p. 332.
^ Wolfram 1997, p. 308.
^ Wolfram 1997, p. 7.
^ ^a ^b Spain: Visigothic Spain to c. 500, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Theodoric, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Cunliffe 2011, p. 442.
^ Cunliffe 2011, pp. 442–444.
^ Heather 2014, pp. 58–59.
^ Heather 2014, pp. 61–68.
^ Pohl 1997, p. 33.
^ Kitchen 1996, pp. 19–20.
^ Kitchen 1996, p. 20.
^ Bauer 2010, p. 172.
^ James 1995, pp. 66–67.
^ Bauer 2010, p. 173.
^ Bauer 2010, pp. 178–179.
^ Kitchen 1996, pp. 24–28.
^ Bury 2000, p. 239.
^ James 1995, p. 60.
^ Morgan 2001, pp. 61–65.
^ Roberts 1996, pp. 121–123.
^ Derry 2012, pp. 16–35.
^ Clements 2005, pp. 214–229.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 310.
^ Vasiliev 1936, pp. 117–135.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 310–311.
^ Sykes 2006, pp. 227–228, 264–266.
^ Geary 1999, p. 110.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 330–331.
^ Heather 2012, pp. 587–588.
^ Menéndez-Pidal 1968, p. 19.
^ Wickham 2009, pp. 150–155.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, p. 311-312.
^ Owen 1960, p. 133.
^ ^a ^b ^c Owen 1960, pp. 179–183.
^ ^a ^b Owen 1960, pp. 183–209.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 225–262.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 209–225.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 153–166.
^ ^a ^b Germanic religion and mythology, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 147–150.
^ ^a ^b Owen 1960, pp. 166–174.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 174–178.
^ Metalwork: Teutonic Tribes, Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
^ Waldman & Mason 2006, pp. 324.
^ MacDowall 2000, p. 16.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 139–143.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 133–139.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 143–147.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 152–153.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 150–153.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 119–133.
^ Owen 1960, pp. 192.
^ Owen 1960, p. 270.
^ Manco 2013, p. 208.
^ Manco 2013, pp. 209–210.
^ McDonald 2005.
^ McGrath 2015, pp. 146–151.
^ Burns 2003, pp. 3–9, 14–23, 331.
^ Golther 1908, p. 3.
^ Strauss 1963, pp. 229–230.
^ Mjöberg 1980, pp. 207–238.
^ Chisholm 1911, p. 912.
^ Kramer & Maza 2002, pp. 124–138.
^ Jansen 2011, pp. 242–243.
^ Jansen 2011, pp. 242–249.
^ Mosse 1964, pp. 67–87.
^ Mosse 1964, pp. 218–225.
^ Smith 1989, pp. 97–111.
^ Derry 2012, pp. 27, 220, 238–248.
^ Weikart 2006, pp. 3–10, 102–126.
^ Oxenstierna 1967, p. 3.

Bibliography

Aubin, Hermann [in German]. "History of Europe: The Germans and Huns". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
Bauer, Susan Wise (2010). The History of the Medieval World: From the Conversion of Constantine to the First Crusade. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-05975-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Beckwith, Christopher I. (2009). Empires of the Silk Road: A History of Central Eurasia from the Bronze Age to the Present. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691135892. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Bloemers, J.H.F.; van Dorp, T. (1991). Pre- en Protohistorie van de Lage Landen (in Dutch). Heerlen: De Haan / Open Universiteit. ISBN 978-90-269-4448-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Boatwright, Mary T.; Gargola, Daniel J.; Talbert, Richard J. A. (2004). The Romans: From Village to Empire. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-511875-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Bogucki, Peter; Crabtree, Pam J. (2003). Ancient Europe 8000 B.C to A.D. 1000. Encyclopedia of the Barbarian World. Vol. Vol. 2. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. ISBN 0-684-80670-3. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Bradshaw, Michael J.; White, George W.; Dymond, Joseph P.; Chacko, Elizabeth (2007). Contemporary World Regional Geography: Global Connections, Local Voices (2 ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education. ISBN 978-0072826838. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |registration= and |subscription= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Brown, Peter (2012). Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 AD. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-16177-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Buccini, Anthony F.; Moulton, William G. [in German]. "Germanic languages: The Emergence of Germanic Languages". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
Burns, Thomas (1994). Barbarians within the Gates of Rome: A Study of Roman Military Policy and the Barbarians, CA. 375–425 A.D. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-31288-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Burns, Thomas (2003). Rome and the Barbarians, 100 B.C.—A.D. 400. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-7306-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Bury, J. B. (2000). The Invasion of Europe by the Barbarians. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-00388-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Caesar, Julius (2019). The War for Gaul: A New Translation. Translated by James O’Donnell. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-69117-492-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Chrysos, Evangelos (2003). "The Empire, the Gentes and the Regna". In Hans-Werner Goetz; Jorg Jarnut; Walter Pohl (eds.). Regna and Gentes: The Relationship between Late Antique and Early Medieval Peoples and Kingdoms in the Transformation of the Roman World. Leiden, NLD: Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 90-04-12524-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Clements, Jonathan (2005). A Brief History of the Vikings: Last Pagans or the First Modern Europeans?. London: Constable & Robinson. ISBN 978-1-84529-076-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Collins, Roger (1999). Early Medieval Europe, 300–1000. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-65808-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Cunliffe, Barry (2011). Europe between the Oceans, 9000 BC–AD 1000. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-17086-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Dalby, Andrew (1999). Dictionary of Languages. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-11568-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Davies, Norman (1998). Europe: A History. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-097468-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Denniston, John Dewar (1962). Appian's Roman History. Harvard University Press. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Derry, T.K. (2012). A History of Scandinavia: Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-3799-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Detwiler, Donald S. (1999). Germany: A Short History. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 978-0-8093-2231-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Drinkwater, John F. (2007). Alamanni and Rome 213–496: Caracalla to Clovis. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-929568-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Geary, Patrick J. (1999). "Barbarians and Ethnicity". In G.W. Bowersock; Peter Brown; Oleg Grabar (eds.). Late Antiquity: A Guide to the Postclassical World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-51173-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
"Germanic peoples". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 11 July 2018.
Goldsworthy, Adrian (2016). Pax Romana. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-30017-882-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Grancsay, Stephen Vincent. "Metalwork: Teutonic Tribes". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 8 September 2019.
Hachmann, Rolf; Kossack, Georg; Kuhn, Hans (1962). Völker zwischen Germanen und Kelten (in German). Neumünster: K. Wachholtz. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Heather, Peter John. "Germany: Ancient History". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
Heather, Peter (2005). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-515954-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Heather, Peter (2012). Empires and Barbarians: The Fall of Rome and the Birth of Europe. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-989226-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Heather, Peter (2014). The Restoration of Rome: Barbarian Popes and Imperial Pretenders. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-936851-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Hoad, T. F., ed. (1996). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-283098-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Katz, Solomon (1955). The Decline of Rome and the Rise of Mediaeval Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. ASIN B007FTF9V4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Kendrick, T.D. (2013). A History of the Vikings. New York: Fall River Press. ISBN 978-1-4351-4641-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Kennedy, Arthur Garfield (1963). "The Indo-European Language Family". In Lee, Donald Woodward (ed.). English Language Reader: Introductory Essays and Exercises. Dodd, Mead. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Kinder, Hermann; Hilgemann, Werner (2004). The Penguin Atlas of World History (Vol 1). Harmondsworth and New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-101263-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Kishlansky, Mark; Geary, Patrick; O'Brien, Patricia (2008). Civilization in the West. New York: Pearson Longman. ISBN 978-0-205-55684-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Kitchen, Martin (1996). The Cambridge Illustrated History of Germany. New York and London: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-45341-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Lamarcq, Danny; Rogge, Marc (1996). De Taalgrens: Van de oude tot de nieuwe Belgen [The Language Border: From the Old to the New Belgians] (in Dutch). Leuven: Davidsfond. ISBN 978-90-6152-960-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Lawrence, William Witherle (1967). Beowulf and Epic Tradition. Hafner. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.F. (2015). East and West in Late Antiquity: Invasion, Settlement, Ethnogenesis and Conflicts of Religion, Chapter 6: The Debate about the Ethnogenesis of the Germanic Tribes. BRILL. pp. 85–100. ISBN 978-90-04-28952-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Magocsi, Paul Robert (2018). Historical Atlas of Central Europe: Third Revised and Expanded Edition. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 1487523319. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
MacCulloch, Diarmaid. Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years. New York: Penguin, 2011. ISBN 978-0-670-02126-0
Mallory, J. P.; Adams, Douglas (1997). Encyclopedia of Indo-European culture. London and Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn. ISBN 978-1-884964-98-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Manco, Jean (2013). Ancestral Journeys: The Peopling of Europe from the First Venturers to the Vikings. New York: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-05178-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
McDonald, J.D. (2005). "Y Haplogroups of the World (PDF map)" (PDF). University of Illinois. Retrieved 22 April 2015. {{cite web}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Menéndez-Pidal, Ramón (1968). Manual de Gramática Histórica Español. Madrid: Espasa Calpe. ISBN 84-239-4755-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Mommsen, Theodor (1968). The Provinces of the Roman Empire: The European Provinces. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. ASIN B000J0J1ZQ. ISBN 0226533956. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Morgan, Kenneth (2001). The Oxford History of Britain. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280135-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
O'Callaghan, Joseph F. "Visigothic Spain to c. 500". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 8 September 2019.
O'Donnell, James (2008). The Ruin of the Roman Empire. New York: Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-06-078741-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Osborne, Roger (2008). Civilization: A New History of the Western World. New York: Pegasus Books. ISBN 978-1-933648-76-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Owen, Francis (1960). The Germanic People. New York: Bookman Associates. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Ozment, Steven (2005). A Mighty Fortress: A New History of the German People. New York: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-093483-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Pagden, Anthony (2001). Peoples and Empires: A Short History of European Migration, Exploration, and Conquest, From Greece to the Present. New York: Modern Library. ISBN 978-0-679-64096-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Partridge, Eric (1966). Origins: Short Etymological Dictionary of Modern English. London: Routledge & K. Paul. ISBN 978-0-7100-1934-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Pasley, Malcolm; Bithell, Jethro (1972). Germany: a companion to German studies. Methuen. ISBN 1438129181. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Petit, Paul; MacMullen, Ramsay. "Ancient Rome: The Barbarian Invasions". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
Pohl, Walter (1997). "The Barbarian Successor States". In Leslie Webster; Michelle Brown (eds.). The Transformation of the Roman World, AD 400–900. London: British Museum Press. ISBN 978-0-7141-0585-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Pohl, Walter (2002). Die Völkerwanderung: Eroberung und Integration (in German). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. ISBN 3-17-015566-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Pop, Ioan Aurel (1996). Romanians and Hungarians from the 9th to the 14th century. Romanian Cultural Foundation. ISBN 9735770377. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Pop, Ioan Aurel (1999). Romanians and Romania: A Brief History. East European Monographs. ISBN 0880334401. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Roberts, J. M. (1996). A History of Europe. New York: Allen Lane. ISBN 978-0-9658431-9-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Roberts, J. M. (1997). A Short History of the World. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-511504-X. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Santosuo, Antonio (2004). Barbarians, Marauders, and Infidels: The Ways of Medieval Warfare. New York: MJF Books. ISBN 978-1-56731-891-3. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus (1776). Seneca's Morals. Gilb. Martin & Sons. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Schulze, Hagen (2001). Germany: A New History. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-00545-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Spaeth, John Duncan Ernst (1921). Old English Poetry. Princeton University Press. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Stümpel, Gustav (1932). Name und Nationalität der Germanen. Eine neue Untersuchung zu Poseidonios, Caesar und Tacitus (in German). Leipzig: Dieterich Verlag. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Sykes, Bryan (2006). Saxons, Vikings, and Celts: The Genetic Roots of Britain and Ireland. London: Bantam Press. ISBN 978-0-393-06268-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Tacitus, Cornelius (1832). Arthur Murphy (ed.). The Historical Annals of Cornelius Tacitus. Vol. Vol. III. Philadelphia: L. Johnson. OCLC 28482775. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Tacitus, Cornelius (1873). The History of Tacitus. Translated by Alfred John Church and W J Brodribb. London: Macmillan&Company. OCLC 154131285. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Tacitus, Cornelius (2009). Agricola and Germany. Translated by Anthony R. Birley. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19953-926-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
"The Order of The Teutonic Knights of St. Mary's Hospital in Jerusalem, 1190–2012". The Imperial Teutonic Order.
Thompson, E. A. "Theodoric". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
Thompson, Edward Arthur (1973). "Germanic Peoples". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Vol. 10. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. pp. 243–246. ISBN 0852291736. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Todd, Malcolm (2004). The Early Germans. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 1-4051-1714-1. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Turville-Petre, E.O.G; Polomé, Edgar Charles. "Germanic religion and mythology". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 12 July 2018.
Vasiliev, Alexander A. (1936). The Goths in the Crimea. Medieval Academy of America. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |subscription= and |registration= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Verhart, Leo (2006). Op Zoek naar de Kelten, Nieuwe archeologische ontdekkingen tussen Noordzee en Rijn (in Dutch). Utrecht: Matrijs. ISBN 978-90-5345-303-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Waldman, Carl; Mason, Catherine (2006). Encyclopedia of European Peoples. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 978-0-8160-4964-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Ward-Perkins, Bryan (2005). The Fall of Rome: And the End of Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280728-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Well, Colin (1996). "Celts and Germans in the Rhineland". In Miranda Green (ed.). The Celtic World. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-14627-2. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Webster’s New World College Dictionary (2010). "Germanic". Collins Online Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |editors=, |registration=, and |subscription= (help)
Wells, Peter S. (2003). The Battle That Stopped Rome: Emperor Augustus, Arminius, and the Slaughter of the Legions in the Teutoburg Forest. New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-39302-028-1. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Wickham, Chris (2009). The Inheritance of Rome: Illuminating the Dark Ages, 400–1000. New York: Viking Press. ISBN 978-0-670-02098-0. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Williams, Derek (1998). Romans and Barbarians. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 0-312-19958-9. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Wolfram, Herwig (1988). History of the Goths. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-05259-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Wolfram, Herwig (1997). The Roman Empire and its Germanic Peoples. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-08511-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Woolf, Greg (2012). Rome: An Empire's Story. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-932518-4. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)

External links

Caesar, De Bello Gallico, on Perseus website, with English and Latin http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:latinLit:phi0448.phi001

@@ Line 337: / Line 337: @@
 On the European continent, [[East Francia]] developed into the [[Kingdom of Germany]], which became the most important part of the [[Holy Roman Empire]] proclaimed by [[Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor|Otto I]] in 962 AD.{{sfn|Waldman|Mason|2006|p=311-312}}
-In the years following the Migration Period, the Germanic peoples adopted many cultural traits from [[Ancient Rome]], embarking on a process of assimilation which by the end of the 20th century had yet to be completed.{{Efn|"Only towards the end of the main phase of the Migrations did the urban life of the Roman Empire begin to exercise any marked influence on the Germanic peoples. From that time on they began to acquire a knowledge of foreign cultures, the cultures of the Mediterranean and Christianity, From that time on they ceased to be purely "Germanic" and began the long process which has not yet been completed, of becoming European."{{sfn|Owen|1960|p=270}} }} While Germanic peoples such as the Goths, Lombards, Franks and Burgundians were completely assimilated by neighboring peoples and disappeared from history, Germanic culture is still prevalent throughout large parts of Northern Europe.{{Efn|name=Bradshaw 72|"During Roman times. Germanic peoples arrived from the east conquering whatever Celtic lands the Romans had not taken, namely the areas just north of the Danube and east of the Rhine. These tribes continually threatened the Roman Empire, sacking Rome itself for the first time in a.d. 410. By the end of the 400s. Gaul was taken over by the Franks, eventually to be renamed for them (France). The Burgundians lent their name to a province (Burgundy) that was eventually absorbed into France. The Visigoths and Lombards moved into the Italian peninsula. The latter name is found in the modern Italian provincial name of Lombardy. The Angles and Saxons moved into the British Isles, pushing the Celtic peoples farther into the fringes of Europe. Even today, the English are considered Anglo-Saxons. Other Germanic tribes moved north into Scandinavia. By the a.d. 800s, they developed a distinct Viking culture... Germanic culture is still prevalent today. Though the Franks, Burgundians. and Lombards adopted the Romance languages of the Roman provinces they conquered, other Germanic peoples, like the Vikings, maintained their Germanic languages through the centuries and are clearly seen on the map today (see Figure 3.4a). Germans. Austrians, Dutch, and the Scandinavians (such as Danes, Norwegians, and Swedes) are the most numerous of today's Germanic peoples. The Germanic peoples also converted to Christianity and later became the driving force behind the creation of the branch of Christianity known as Protestantism."{{sfn|Bradshaw|White|Dymond|Chacko|2007|p=72}} }}{{Efn|"GERMANICS location: Greater Europe time period: Second millennium B.C.E. to present ancestry: Germanic language: Germanic."{{sfn|Waldman|Mason|2006|p=296}} }} Modern Germanic peoples include the Danes, Icelanders, Norwegians and Swedes, who belong to the North Germanic/Scandinavian branch,{{Efn|name=Kennedy}}{{Efn|"Scandinavians (Swedes, Danes, Norwegians) are Germanic peoples, specifically the northern branch, and descendants of Vikings. Their languages and histories are closely related."{{sfn|Bradshaw|White|Dymond|Chacko|2007|p=113}} }} and Dutch people, English people and Germans, who belong to the West Germanic branch.{{Efn|name=Bradshaw 72}}{{Efn|name=Spaeth}}{{Efn|name=Lawrence}}{{Efn|"Germanic peoples (3A). A broadly defined group of peoples from northern Europe who began to move south into Germany and other areas of Europe around 500 B.C. Modern Germans, Austrians, Dutch, and the Scandinavians (Danes, Norwegians, Swedes) are the most numerous of today's Germanic peoples."{{sfn|Bradshaw|White|Dymond|Chacko|2007|p=572}} }}{{Efn|"Germanic... group of N European peoples including the Germans, Scandinavians, Dutch, English, etc., or the peoples from whom they are descended."{{sfn|Germanic, ''Webster’s New World College Dictionary''}} }} Along with [[Romance peoples]] and [[Slavs]], Germanic peoples constitute one of the three major collections of ethnic groups in modern Europe.{{Efn|"[C]ontemporary Europe is made up of three large groups of peoples, divided on the criteria of their origin and linguistic affiliation. They are the following: the Romanic or neo-Latin peoples (Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese, French, Romanians, etc.), the Germanic peoples (Germans proper, English, Dutch, Danes, Norwegians, Swedes, Icelanders, etc.), and the Slavic peoples (Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians, Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Bulgarians, Serbs, Croats, Slovenians, etc.)."{{sfn|Pop|1996|p=25}} }}{{Efn|"European peoples can be discussed in terms of the following delineations: Germanic (the Germans, English, Dutch, Norwegians, Swedes, and Danes), Slavic (the Russians, Belorussians, Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croats, Slovenians, and Bulgarians) and Romanic."{{sfn|Pop|1999|p=5}} }}{{Efn|"In. the nineteenth century, the population of Central Eu - rope contained peoples from the three major ethnolinguistic groups of Europe—the Germanic, Romance, and Slavic..."{{sfn|Magocsi|2018|p=97}} }}
 ==Demographics==

v t e Germanic peoples
Ethnolinguistic group of Northern European origin primarily identified as speakers of Germanic languages
History	Nordic Bronze Age Germania Pre-Roman Iron Age Roman Iron Age Romano-Germanic culture Germanic Iron Age Viking Age
Early culture	Architecture Art Calendar Clothing Family Festivals Folklore Proto-Germanic folklore Anglo-Saxon mythology Continental Germanic mythology Norse mythology) Funerary practices Anglo-Saxon Norse Law Anglo-Saxon Norse Literature Anglo-Saxon Norse Names Gothic Numbers Paganism Anglo-Saxon Gothic Norse Rings Scripts Gothic alphabet Runes Symbology Warfare Anglo-Saxon Gothic and Vandal Viking
Languages	Germanic parent language Proto-Germanic language East Germanic languages North Germanic languages West Germanic languages
Groups	Alemanni Brisgavi Bucinobantes Lentienses Raetovari Adrabaecampi Angles Anglo-Saxons Ambrones Ampsivarii Angrivarii Armalausi Auiones Avarpi Baemi Baiuvarii Banochaemae Bastarnae Batavi Belgae Germani cisrhenani Atuatuci Caeroesi Condrusi Eburones Paemani Segni Morini Nervii Bateinoi Betasii Brondings Bructeri Burgundians Buri Cananefates Caritni Casuari Chaedini Chaemae Chamavi Chali Charudes Chasuarii Chattuarii Chatti Chauci Cherusci Cimbri Cobandi Corconti Cugerni Danes Dauciones Dulgubnii Favonae Firaesi Fosi Franks Ripuarian Franks Salian Franks Frisiavones Frisii Gambrivii Geats Gepids Goths Crimean Goths Greuthungi Gutones Ostrogoths Thervingi Thracian Goths Visigoths Gutes Harii Hermunduri Heruli Hilleviones Ingaevones Irminones Istvaeones Jutes Juthungi Lacringi Lemovii Lombards Heaðobards Lugii Diduni Helisii Helveconae Manimi Nahanarvali Marcomanni Marsacii Marsi Mattiaci Nemetes Njars Nuithones Osi Quadi Reudigni Rugii Rugini Saxons Semnones Sicambri Sciri Sitones Suarines Suebi Sunici Swedes Taifals Tencteri Teutons Thelir Thuringii Toxandri Treveri Triboci Tubantes Tulingi Tungri Ubii Usipetes Vagoth Vandals Hasdingi Silingi Vangiones Varisci Victohali Vidivarii Vinoviloth Warini
Christianization	Gothic Christianity Christianization of the Franks Christianisation of Anglo-Saxon England Christianization of Scandinavia Christianization of Iceland
Category

Authority control databases
National	Germany France BnF data Japan Czech Republic 2
Other	Historical Dictionary of Switzerland